551 the Constitution Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

551 the Constitution Project Index “24” (TV series), 253, 258, 335–36 as gateway to Guantánamo, 33–35, 65–68 519th Military Intelligence Battalion, 63, 70, 104, 107 National Directorate of Security (NDS), 23, 83, 276, 322–26 A rendition, role in, 173–74 Aamer, Shaker, 47–48 black sites, 72–74, 172–73, 177–79 Abdulmutallab, Umar Farouk (“underwear bomber”), 265, Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission 319 (AIHRC), 24, 81, 83, 322, 324, 326 Abu Ghraib, 105–8 Afifi (Nik Abd-al Rahman bin Mustapha), 255 see also al-Jamadi, Manadel; Fay Report; Miller Report; Agiza, Ahmed, 165, 172, 175, 196, 200 Taguba Report Ahmed, Ibrahim Saeed, see al-Kuwaiti changes after Abu Ghraib, 114–16 al-Ani, Ibrahim Khalid Samir, 87–88 effect on U.S. policy, 7 al-Asad, Mohammed, 194, 198 England, Lynndie, 106 Al Farooq (training camp), 60 Frederick, Ivan, 106, 108 al-Faruq, Omar, 178 Graner, Charles, 95–96, 106–9 al-Ghuraba, see Ghuraba cell medical personnel and BSCTs, 224–26 al-Hajj, Sami, 40, 47, 64, 69, 227–28, 288, 291 mental effects, 291 al Hawsawi, Mustafa, 169 physical effects, 287–88 Al-Husayn, see Abu Zubaydah reactions, 339 al-Jamadi, Manadel (“Ice Man”), 95–97, 179–80 Alberto Mora, 46 responses to death of, 21, 101, 330–31 ICRC and Christophe Girod, 51–55 al-Kuwaiti, Abu Ahmed (Ibrahim Saeed Ahmed), 245–47 setup of interrogation operations, 104–5 Allbright, Ben, 111, 277 Abu Zubaydah (Zayn Al-Abedin Muhammed Al-Husayn) Allen, John, 326 CIA’s psychological assessment, 142 Allen, Mark, 272 interrogation techniques al-Libi, Abu Faraj, 188, 245–46 and medical professionals’ role, 206–11, 216–17 al-Libi, Ibn al-Shaykh, 172, 174, 178, 194, 261–62, 264 and veracity/value of intelligence gained, 248–53, All-Party Parliamentary Group on Extraordinary Rendition 260–61 (UK), 198–99, 268 legal action on behalf of, 197 al-Nashiri, Abd al-Rahim, 48, 169, 177, 181–85, 188, 197, Lithuania, interrogation in, 192 210, 217 OLC memo on interrogation of, 144–45 Al Qaeda, application of Geneva Conventions to, 134–38 Poland, interrogation in, 182–85 al Qahtani, Mohammed, 39–40, 41, 221–22, 241, 245–46 Thailand, interrogation in, 177–82 al-Rawi, Bisher, 178, 196–97, 284–85, 287, 290, 292, 294 Addington, David, 36, 44, 131–32, 142, 144, 148, 153, 268 Al Saadi, Sami, 169, 172, 197, 268, 272–73 Afghanistan, 57–84 Al Shabab, 194–95, 321, 329–30 BSCTs, see Behavioral Science Consultant Teams al-Sharif, Khalid, 178–79, 270, 273–75 counterinsurgent strategy, development of, 75–81 al-Shoroeiya, see Shoroeiya Detention Facility at Parwan (DFIP), 76–77, 81, 82–84 Al-Zawahiri, Ayman, 168 early setup, 62–64 Alzery, Muhammed, 165, 172, 175, 200 “fog of war,” 59–62 American College of Physicians future of detention and U.S. role, 81–84 ethical obligations toward detainees, 234, 236, 238 The Constitution Project 551 The Report of The Constitution Project’s Task Force on Detainee Treatment American Medical Association (AMA) Iraq, 179–80 ethical obligations toward detainees, 230, 234, 235, Kosovo, 193–94 237–38 Lithuania, 188–92 American Psychiatric Association Morocco, 192–93 ethical obligations toward detainees, 234, 236–37 Poland, 182–86 American Psychological Association (APA) and PENS report Romania, 186–88 ethical obligations toward detainees, 234, 238–40 Salt Pit, see Salt Pit American Taliban, see Lindh, John Walker Somalia, 195–96 Amin, Mohammad Farik, see Zubair Thailand, 180–82 Anusauskas, Arvydas, 189–92 Blacksmith Hotel, 97, 109 Appendix M, see Army Field Manual on Interrogation Blair, Dennis, 244, 265, 314 Arar, Maher, 169–70, 172, 196, 201, 262, 285, 332 Blair, Tony, 199, 272 Army Field Manual on Interrogation, 23, 46, 63, 70, 75, 103, Bloche, M. Gregg, 225, 237, 258–59 105, 265, 313, 326, 329, 342 Boumediene v. Bush, 50, 157 Appendix M, 23, 265, 327–28 Boykin, William, 92 Asad, see al-Asad, Mohammed Bradbury, Steven, 149, 153–57, 160, 167, 213–15, 232, Ashcroft, John, 142, 146–48, 150, 196 248–49, 252–53, 335 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), 79, 130, Brand, William, 71–72 132–33, 138–39 Brant, David, 41, 42, 222 Breasseale, Todd, 21, 80 B Brennan, John, 314, 343–44 Bagram Air Base, 4, 6, 8, 62–66, 68–72, 74–78, 81, 84, 107, Britel, Abou Elkassim (Kassim el-Britel), 192–93, 196, 173, 177–78, 195–96, 251, 261, 276, 328 281–82, 291 Baheer, Ghairat, 179 Bryson, Jennifer, 276 Baker, Sean, 40 BSCTs, see Behavioral Science Consultant Teams (BSCTs) Balad (Iraq), 100–101, 102, 113 Bumgarner, Mike, 47 Banna, see el-Banna Bureau of Prisons (BOP), 228–31, 280 Barak, Aharon, 266 Burney, Paul, 219–22 Bashmilah, Mohamed, 177, 196 Bush, George W., 3, 4, 7, 33, 36, 41, 48, 62, 130, 156, 166, Battlefield Interrogation Facility (Camp Nama), 87–94 175, 177, 207–8, 250–51, 253–54, 261, 267–68, Beaver, Diane, 37–39, 90, 221, 258 314, 315, 320, 342–43 Begg, Moazzam, 65–66, 281, 283, 284, 285, 290, 292, 294, “Bush Six” 309 criminal complaint against, 267–68 Behavioral Science Consultant Teams (BSCTs) Bybee, Jay, 131, 135–36, 138–42, 144–47, 150–52 , 157–60, at Guantánamo, 37–38, 55, 219–24 208, 268 in Iraq and Afghanistan, 224–25 see also Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) Surgeon General’s determination re BSCTs, 235 Belhadj, Abdel Hakim, 172, 181, 197–98, 268, 270–72, 273 C Bellinger, John, 131, 141, 156, 199, 200 Cambone, Stephen, 92–93 Belmar, Richard, 197 Cameron, David, 268 Biden, Joe, 168 Camp Bondsteel (Kosovo), 193–94 bin al Shibh, Ramzi, 169, 177, 183, 188, 192–93, 250–51, 333 Camp Bucca (Iraq), 115, 116–17, 276 bin Arshad, Masran, 254–55 Camp Cropper (Iraq), 87–88, 90 bin Attash, Hassan, 178, 251 Camp Delta (Guantánamo), 29–30, 35, 47 bin Attash, Walid, 48, 183, 184, 188, 216 Camp Iguana (Guantánamo), 48 bin Laden, Osama, 59–60, 269 Camp Nama, see Battlefield Interrogation Facility Library Tower plot, 250, 254, 256, 257 Camps 5, 6 & 7 (Guantánamo), 48–49, 224 meeting with Al Saadi, 272 Camp X-Ray (Guantánamo), 29–30, 37, 289 meeting with Belhadj, 271 Canada value of EITs in capturing, 11, 245–47 rendition, role in, 172 Zero Dark Thirty, 245, 335–36 Carrico, Terry, 36–37 bin Lep, Bashir (“Lillie”), 181, 255, 257 Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) bin Mustapha, see Afifi high-value detainees’ accounts of CIA interrogation Birt, Angela, 71, 91 program, 215–18 biscuits, see Behavioral Science Consultant Teams (BSCTs) Inspector General Report, 21, 97, 149, 184, 209–11, 215, black sites, 177–96 217, 331 Afghanistan, 72–74, 172–73, 177–79 medical personnel, applicability of professional ethics, Djibouti, 194–95 234–36 552 The Constitution Project Index medical professionals’ role in treatment of prisoners in D CIA custody, 205–16 Dababa, Dilar, 94–95 Office of Medical Services (OMS), 154, 209, 242 Dalton, Jane, 39 guidelines on medical treatment of detainees, 212–15, Dark Prison (Afghanistan), 172–73, 177–79 235 Dayton, Keith, 87, 105 Red Cross findings on CIA interrogation program, 215–18 deaths in custody, 21, 22, 48, 49, 61–62, 66, 68–72, 69, 71, Rendition Group, 166–67, 194 74, 94–101, 104, 110–15, 174, 179–80, 182, 225–27, response to allegations of abuse, 101–4 276–78, 330–31 Salt Pit, see Salt Pit Deek, Khalil, 65 and Special Forces in Iraq, 87–104 Defense Department (DOD) suspicious deaths, 94–100 see also specific subject headings Cheney, Dick, 4, 131–32, 268, 319, 336, 342 Criminal Investigation Task Force, 41, 219 Church Report, 63, 74–76, 113, 225 differences of opinion re interrogation, 41–46 CIA, see Central Intelligence Agency medical personnel, applicability of professional ethics, civilian court system 234–36 use of by Obama Administration, 317–20 TCP Task Force statement, findings and Clarke, Richard, 166 recommendations, 7, 15, 16, 18–21 Claus, Joshua, 66, 68–70, 72 Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), 92, 174, 329 Clinton, Bill, 2, 17, 59, 131, 165–66, 320 re-engagement data, see recidivism Colvin, Richard, 323, 325 TCP Task Force findings and recommendations, 20–21 Combatant Status Review Tribunals (CSRTs), 34–35, 47, 211, Deghayes, Omar, 197, 284–85, 288–89, 292, 294 217, 295 Delahunty, Robert, 132–33, 135, 147, 157–58, 175 Combined Joint Task Forces (CJTFs) Department of, see other part of name CJTF-7, 91, 105, 179 Detainee Abuse Task Force, 113–14 CJTF-180, 63, 72, 75, 79 Detainee Interrogation Working Group, 43 Common Article 3, see Geneva Conventions Detainee Review Boards (DRBs), 78–81 Conboy, Ken, 256–57 detainees confessions see also specific topics and names efficacy of torture/EITs, see torture effect on, 279–94 false confessions, danger of, 258–62 long-term effects of detention and abuse, 287–94 Congress, role of, 337–46 mental effects, 289–94 historical perspective, 346–46 physical effects, 287–89 reactions to post–Sept.11 abuses, 339–44 release, practical issues upon, 280–87 consequences of U.S. policies, 267–94 economic hardship, 282–85 detainees, impact upon, 279–94 limited mobility, 285 detention operations, 267–75 procedures, establishment of, 286–87 international legal consequences, 267–68 stigma, 281–82 international political consequences, 269–75 Detainee Treatment Act, 155–56 operational consequences for U.S. military, 275–79 detention, see specific subject headings impact on relationship with foreign militaries, 278–79 Diaz, Walter, 95–97, 179–80 impact on U.S. personnel, 276–78 Diego Garcia base, 199 TCP Task Force findings and recommendations, 20 Dilawar Constitution of the U.S.
Recommended publications
  • In the Supreme Court of the United States
    No. ________ In the Supreme Court of the United States KHALED A. F. AL ODAH, ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., RESPONDENTS. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI DAVID J. CYNAMON THOMAS B. WILNER MATTHEW J. MACLEAN COUNSEL OF RECORD OSMAN HANDOO NEIL H. KOSLOWE PILLSBURY WINTHROP AMANDA E. SHAFER SHAW PITTMAN LLP SHERI L. SHEPHERD 2300 N Street, N.W. SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP Washington, DC 20037 801 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. 202-663-8000 Washington, DC 20004 202-508-8000 GITANJALI GUTIERREZ J. WELLS DIXON GEORGE BRENT MICKUM IV SHAYANA KADIDAL SPRIGGS & HOLLINGSWORTH CENTER FOR 1350 “I” Street N.W. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS Washington, DC 20005 666 Broadway, 7th Floor 202-898-5800 New York, NY 10012 212-614-6438 Counsel for Petitioners Additional Counsel Listed on Inside Cover JOSEPH MARGULIES JOHN J. GIBBONS MACARTHUR JUSTICE CENTER LAWRENCE S. LUSTBERG NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY GIBBONS P.C. LAW SCHOOL One Gateway Center 357 East Chicago Avenue Newark, NJ 07102 Chicago, IL 60611 973-596-4500 312-503-0890 MARK S. SULLIVAN BAHER AZMY CHRISTOPHER G. KARAGHEUZOFF SETON HALL LAW SCHOOL JOSHUA COLANGELO-BRYAN CENTER FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 833 McCarter Highway 250 Park Avenue Newark, NJ 07102 New York, NY 10177 973-642-8700 212-415-9200 DAVID H. REMES MARC D. FALKOFF COVINGTON & BURLING COLLEGE OF LAW 1201 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. NORTHERN ILLINOIS Washington, DC 20004 UNIVERSITY 202-662-5212 DeKalb, IL 60115 815-753-0660 PAMELA CHEPIGA SCOTT SULLIVAN ANDREW MATHESON DEREK JINKS KAREN LEE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SARAH HAVENS SCHOOL OF LAW ALLEN & OVERY LLP RULE OF LAW IN WARTIME 1221 Avenue of the Americas PROGRAM New York, NY 10020 727 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Conspiracy to Commit Poetry: Empathetic Lawyering at Guantanamo Bay
    Seattle Journal for Social Justice Volume 6 Issue 1 Fall/Winter 2007 Article 22 November 2007 Conspiracy to Commit Poetry: Empathetic Lawyering at Guantanamo Bay Marc Falkoff Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sjsj Recommended Citation Falkoff, Marc (2007) "Conspiracy to Commit Poetry: Empathetic Lawyering at Guantanamo Bay," Seattle Journal for Social Justice: Vol. 6 : Iss. 1 , Article 22. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sjsj/vol6/iss1/22 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Publications and Programs at Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Seattle Journal for Social Justice by an authorized editor of Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 3 Conspiracy to Commit Poetry: Empathetic Lawyering at Guantánamo Bay Marc D. Falkoff1 The idea to publish a volume of detainee poetry came to me, oddly enough, while I was reading a book of poems written by a U.S. infantry team leader during his stint in the Iraq War. As I paged through Brian Turner’s Here, Bullet, I was struck by how the soldier-poet opened himself to the strangeness of the Mesopotamian war zone, shoring fragments from the battlefield to build poems of terrible stillness and beauty. In “In the Leupold Scope,” for example, Turner imagines a soldier on a rooftop, peering through a spotting scope and witnessing an Iraqi woman hanging laundry from a clothesline: She is dressing the dead, clothing them as they wait in silence, the pigeons circling as fumestacks billow a noxious black smoke.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Turns the Other Way As Judges Make Findings About Torture and Other Abuse
    USA SEE NO EVIL GOVERNMENT TURNS THE OTHER WAY AS JUDGES MAKE FINDINGS ABOUT TORTURE AND OTHER ABUSE Amnesty International Publications First published in February 2011 by Amnesty International Publications International Secretariat Peter Benenson House 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW United Kingdom www.amnesty.org Copyright Amnesty International Publications 2011 Index: AMR 51/005/2011 Original Language: English Printed by Amnesty International, International Secretariat, United Kingdom All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publishers. Amnesty International is a global movement of 2.2 million people in more than 150 countries and territories, who campaign on human rights. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights instruments. We research, campaign, advocate and mobilize to end abuses of human rights. Amnesty International is independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion. Our work is largely financed by contributions from our membership and donations CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 Judges point to human rights violations, executive turns away ........................................... 4 Absence
    [Show full text]
  • Forensic Mental Health Evaluations in the Guantánamo Military Commissions System: an Analysis of All Detainee Cases from Inception to 2018 T ⁎ Neil Krishan Aggarwal
    International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 64 (2019) 34–39 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Law and Psychiatry journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijlawpsy Forensic mental health evaluations in the Guantánamo military commissions system: An analysis of all detainee cases from inception to 2018 T ⁎ Neil Krishan Aggarwal Clinical Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, Committee on Global Thought, Columbia University, New York State Psychiatric Institute, United States ABSTRACT Even though the Bush Administration opened the Guantánamo Bay detention facility in 2002 in response to the September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States, little remains known about how forensic mental health evaluations relate to the process of detainees who are charged before military commissions. This article discusses the laws governing Guantánamo's military commissions system and mental health evaluations. Notably, the US government initially treated detaineesas“unlawful enemy combatants” who were not protected under the US Constitution and the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Forms of Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment, allowing for the use of “enhanced interrogation techniques.” In subsequent legal documents, however, the US government has excluded evidence obtained through torture, as defined by the US Constitution and the United Nations Convention Against Torture. Using open-source document analysis, this article describes the reasons and outcomes of all forensic mental health evaluations from Guantánamo's opening to 2018. Only thirty of 779 detainees (~3.85%) have ever had charges referred against them to the military commissions, and only nine detainees (~1.16%) have ever received forensic mental health evaluations pertaining to their case.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan: Post-Taliban Governance, Security, and U.S
    Afghanistan: Post-Taliban Governance, Security, and U.S. Policy (name redacted) Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs (name redacted) Analyst in Middle Eastern Affairs November 7, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RL30588 Afghanistan: Post-Taliban Governance, Security, and U.S. Policy Summary The United States, partner countries, and the Afghan government are attempting to reverse recent gains made by the resilient Taliban-led insurgency since the December 2014 transition to a smaller international mission consisting primarily of training and advising the Afghanistan National Defense and Security Forces (ANDSF). The Afghan government has come under increasing domestic criticism not only for failing to prevent insurgent gains but also for its internal divisions that have spurred the establishment of new political opposition coalitions. In September 2014, the United States brokered a compromise to address a dispute over the 2014 presidential election, but a September 2016 deadline was not met for enacting election reforms and deciding whether to elevate the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) position to a prime ministership. The Afghan government has made some measurable progress in reducing corruption and implementing its budgetary and other commitments. It has adopted measures that would enable it to proceed with new parliamentary elections, but no election date has been set. The number of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, which peaked at about 100,000 in 2011, is about 9,800, of which most are assigned to the 13,000-person NATO-led “Resolute Support Mission” (RSM) that trains, assists, and advises the ANDSF. About 2,000 of the U.S. contingent are involved in combat against Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups, including the Afghanistan branch of the Islamic State organization (ISIL-Khorasan), under “Operation Freedom’s Sentinel” (OFS).
    [Show full text]
  • Top Ten Taglines
    Guantanamo: Detainee Accounts Table of Contents I. Transfer to Guantanamo.......................................................................................................... 1 II. Living conditions ..................................................................................................................... 5 III. Interrogation........................................................................................................................... 9 IV. Humilation and Degradation.............................................................................................. 13 V. Punishment............................................................................................................................. 15 VI. Beatings and other inappropriate use of force................................................................. 18 VII. Suicide Attempts................................................................................................................. 22 VIII. Release ................................................................................................................................ 22 IX. After-effects .......................................................................................................................... 23 Introduction The following is a compilation by Human Rights Watch of accounts by thirty-three former detainees at Guantanamo of their experiences there. Human Rights Watch interviewed sixteen of the detainees, reviewed press reports containing statements by former detainees interviewed
    [Show full text]
  • Interrogation, Detention, and Torture DEBORAH N
    Finding Effective Constraints on Executive Power: Interrogation, Detention, and Torture DEBORAH N. PEARLSTEIN* INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................1255 I. EXECUTIVE POLICY AND PRACTICE: COERCIVE INTERROGATION AND T O RTU RE ....................................................................................................1257 A. Vague or Unlawful Guidance................................................................ 1259 B. Inaction .................................................................................................1268 C. Resources, Training, and a Plan........................................................... 1271 II. ExECuTrVE LIMITs: FINDING CONSTRAINTS THAT WORK ...........................1273 A. The ProfessionalM ilitary...................................................................... 1274 B. The Public Oversight Organizationsof Civil Society ............................1279 C. Activist Federal Courts .........................................................................1288 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................1295 INTRODUCTION While the courts continue to debate the limits of inherent executive power under the Federal Constitution, the past several years have taught us important lessons about how and to what extent constitutional and sub-constitutional constraints may effectively check the broadest assertions of executive power. Following the publication
    [Show full text]
  • Of 4 27/02/2009
    Page 1 of 4 All Party Parliamentary Group on Extraordinary Rendition House of Commons Press release: Immediate, 26 February 2009 Andrew Tyrie calls on the Government to conduct a comprehensive inquiry into its involvement in the US rendition programme, following the MOD’s admission that people captured by UK Forces were rendered to Afghanistan for interrogation by the US. “Since the All Party Parliamentary Group on Extraordinary Rendition was created, I have made a number of specific allegations: that the UK has facilitated rendition; that Diego Garcia was used for this purpose; that our Armed Forces were dragged into rendition.” “Each of these was categorically denied. A recent MOD review of detention practices condemned as ‘baseless’ speculation that the MOD was complicit in rendition. Yet all of them have turned out to be true, confirmed in three Ministerial Statements over the past year, and a High Court judgment.” “US assurances that it does not use torture are unreliable, as the Foreign Affairs Committee concluded in its Human Rights Annual Report published last year.” “Given that all previous assurances have been baseless, we can have no confidence in the ones we are being given now. The Government must now carry out a comprehensive inquiry in order to bring closure to this sorry business.” Ends. Notes to editors The APPG has been investigating this issue since 2007. The Statement today sets out that two people, captured by UK Forces, were rendered to Afghanistan by the US: “Two individuals were captured by UK forces in Iraq. They were transferred to US detention, in accordance with normal practice, and then moved subsequently to a US detention facility in Afghanistan.
    [Show full text]
  • Genealogy of the Concept of Securitization and Minority Rights
    THE KURD INDUSTRY: UNDERSTANDING COSMOPOLITANISM IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY by ELÇIN HASKOLLAR A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School – Newark Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Global Affairs written under the direction of Dr. Stephen Eric Bronner and approved by ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ Newark, New Jersey October 2014 © 2014 Elçin Haskollar ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION The Kurd Industry: Understanding Cosmopolitanism in the Twenty-First Century By ELÇIN HASKOLLAR Dissertation Director: Dr. Stephen Eric Bronner This dissertation is largely concerned with the tension between human rights principles and political realism. It examines the relationship between ethics, politics and power by discussing how Kurdish issues have been shaped by the political landscape of the twenty- first century. It opens up a dialogue on the contested meaning and shape of human rights, and enables a new avenue to think about foreign policy, ethically and politically. It bridges political theory with practice and reveals policy implications for the Middle East as a region. Using the approach of a qualitative, exploratory multiple-case study based on discourse analysis, several Kurdish issues are examined within the context of democratization, minority rights and the politics of exclusion. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews, archival research and participant observation. Data analysis was carried out based on the theoretical framework of critical theory and discourse analysis. Further, a discourse-interpretive paradigm underpins this research based on open coding. Such a method allows this study to combine individual narratives within their particular socio-political, economic and historical setting.
    [Show full text]
  • The Abu Ghraib Convictions: a Miscarriage of Justice
    Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal Volume 32 Article 4 9-1-2013 The Abu Ghraib Convictions: A Miscarriage of Justice Robert Bejesky Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/bpilj Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, and the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Robert Bejesky, The Abu Ghraib Convictions: A Miscarriage of Justice, 32 Buff. Envtl. L.J. 103 (2013). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/bpilj/vol32/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ABU GHRAIB CONVICTIONS: A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE ROBERT BEJESKYt I. INTRODUCTION ..................... ..... 104 II. IRAQI DETENTIONS ...............................107 A. Dragnet Detentions During the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq.........................107 B. Legal Authority to Detain .............. ..... 111 C. The Abuse at Abu Ghraib .................... 116 D. Chain of Command at Abu Ghraib ..... ........ 119 III. BASIS FOR CRIMINAL CULPABILITY ..... ..... 138 A. Chain of Command ....................... 138 B. Systemic Influences ....................... 140 C. Reduced Rights of Military Personnel and Obedience to Authority ................ ..... 143 D. Interrogator Directives ................ ....
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Dictionary of Air Intelligence
    Historical Dictionaries of Intelligence and Counterintelligence Jon Woronoff, Series Editor 1. British Intelligence, by Nigel West, 2005. 2. United States Intelligence, by Michael A. Turner, 2006. 3. Israeli Intelligence, by Ephraim Kahana, 2006. 4. International Intelligence, by Nigel West, 2006. 5. Russian and Soviet Intelligence, by Robert W. Pringle, 2006. 6. Cold War Counterintelligence, by Nigel West, 2007. 7. World War II Intelligence, by Nigel West, 2008. 8. Sexspionage, by Nigel West, 2009. 9. Air Intelligence, by Glenmore S. Trenear-Harvey, 2009. Historical Dictionary of Air Intelligence Glenmore S. Trenear-Harvey Historical Dictionaries of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, No. 9 The Scarecrow Press, Inc. Lanham, Maryland • Toronto • Plymouth, UK 2009 SCARECROW PRESS, INC. Published in the United States of America by Scarecrow Press, Inc. A wholly owned subsidiary of The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc. 4501 Forbes Boulevard, Suite 200, Lanham, Maryland 20706 www.scarecrowpress.com Estover Road Plymouth PL6 7PY United Kingdom Copyright © 2009 by Glenmore S. Trenear-Harvey All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Information Available Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Trenear-Harvey, Glenmore S., 1940– Historical dictionary of air intelligence / Glenmore S. Trenear-Harvey. p. cm. — (Historical dictionaries of intelligence and counterintelligence ; no. 9) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN-13: 978-0-8108-5982-1 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-8108-5982-3 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-13: 978-0-8108-6294-4 (eBook) ISBN-10: 0-8108-6294-8 (eBook) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Massacre of Hazaras in Afghanistan
    1 Genocide OF Hazaras In Afghanistan By TALIBAN Compiled by: M.A. Gulzari 5th March 2001 2 To those innocents, who killed by Taliban. A Hazara Hanged publicaly in Heart Bazar 3 CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 Massacres of Mazar Eyewitness………………………………………………………………………………… ……….4 MASSCRES OF MAZAR SHARIF………………………………….8 I. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS .........................................................................12 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................16 III. THE FIRST DAY OF THE TAKEOVER ...........................................................................18 8 The Taliban fly white flags from their vehicles.......................................................................23 V. ABDUCTIONS OF AND ASSAULTS ON WOMEN..........................................................24 V. ABDUCTIONS OF AND ASSAULTS ON WOMEN..........................................................25 VI. DETENTIONS OF PERSONS TRYING TO LEAVE.........................................................26 II. ATTACKS ON CIVILIANS FLEEING MAZAR.................................................................27 VII. THE APPLICABLE LAW.................................................................................................28 VIII. THE TALIBAN’S REPRESSIVE SOCIAL POLICIES....................................................29 IX. CONCLUSION...................................................................................................................30 CHAPTER2………………………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]