DOCSLIB.ORG

U.S. EPA, Pesticide Product Label, , 02/25/1986

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
U.S. EPA, Pesticide Product Label, , 02/25/1986 us ENVIRONMENTAL PROTE:CTlON AGENCY OFFICE OF PESTICIUES PROGRAMS REGISTRATION DIVISION (15-767) WASHINGTON. DC 20460 UAME OF PESTICIDE PRODUCT NOTICE OF PESTICIDE: o REGISTRATION o REREGISTRA TION fUuc'.-! rlh' F."kr",' 11I~I·l·lIC;(h·. FI1I1l~icitl.·. ,Il/(l (.(,>II.'/lI'c,d., Acr, ..,~ ,Hllt-"iI"dl NAME ANO ADDRESS OF REGISTRANT (fnc/"d .. 70,1' cad(') r ~f LI' L):vll,lCiJj LClh!.ill'j ~iL'I.' j"'jlul !: U 1 l.. j :i{JL NCTE: Changes in labeling formula dIHC"rin~ in substance from that accepted in connectjtln with this registration must be submitl~d to and accepted br the Rcr;istn.lion Oi,',sion prior 10 use of the label In commerce. In anr correspondt"nce on this produclalways refer to the above U.S. EPA registratiun number. On the basis of information furnished by the registrant, the above named pesticide is hereb}' Registered/Reregistered under the Federal In~ccticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. A copy of the labelJng accepted in connection with this Registralion/Rercgistratlon is returned herewith. Registration is in no way to be construed as an indorsement or a ,JprO\'a I of this product h~' this Agency. In order to protect health and the em'ironment, the Administrator, on his motion, malo' at an}' time suspend or cancel the rcr.istralion of a pest­ icide in accordanc.::- with the Act. The acceptance of an)' name in connection with th~ registration of a product under this Act is not to be construed as giving the registrant a right to exclusi\'e use of the namc or to its usc if it has been co\'ercd by others. 'i'lll!::, lICOl..Ct. .l.~ COIlGiL.l.c..nalJ), I\..:(;l!.;t..Cl:eu HI ac.;t:(..;r(;..-~IJCL wlth l"ll-RA ~eCt..l.(jr, 3(c)(~/)lA} pi (.'V.l.UC<.! t.iJat YU.l: 1. !:Jut-lIllt. aJ'U/LI (;JtL: olJ (;('1...<.( It'-jl.J1)~l:U tvl 1\..:~ll~~L~tl(jn/rel~gl&Lrbt.1Lh (.-1 YVUl 1 1 ((JUCl.. l.illl.,lCl t it-h.i' ~,LCl.l.<"'J, ~(C)(~) \·>lH.1I tJ,r }\~ ... l,C), r l-(jU.l.n.. ;t;. ill.! ~. Ha},l UH;. J.:lJJ(-:J.l.UY cr.c..tJ.St..~ 11SU.(J IJt.;jL'\'. hl·1l.1L )'l.U Tf.:~L·.J.b(: tJ ... J ;[u(,liCt tal !:'h.l.l-'mdlt: a • .AOO tile. plU.. b.ht "Ll-'A ht:_<.J1stIi-lt.lvn He. 3u16"J-t>." o. haa the lullo\.inC] tv the ::>t.atelltent 01 l'~act:.lcal 'l'leatml.~nl. "U0 not intluc\. vvm.l.t.l.I1~ vI glve anytb.l.ny lJY JU0uth tc an 1IliCUfiSCluUb (!erhon." @TT CHME1T I~ APPLI ABLE I EPA Foren 8570-6 (Rov. ~ 6) PREVIOUS EDITION MAY BE USED UNTIL SUPPLY IS EXHAUS~EO. I 90475:Erumsele:T-2.KENCO:2/21/86:3/5/86:TAR:MD :~ , , '" '. '" ,', " .,; , :. , :.!:, ... ,~::.. ,,'•. ~:.- .~':~'.:'~' ~ ,,, '~.::.;;;.. \~ :~. 1;>- _~_ .' ,.:; l,~i'l :~. t·, ;.1 2 3. Verity that the pruduct tested, 4li Cyanazine F'L (data submitted by lIe lena Cheillical) ir. identical to Sctre Cyanazine 4L Herbicide. It thel.e are ditler~ltces b~t.\ieen the prOducts, thE! data must b~ rereviewed in order to d~termine 'rlhetht!r or not the studies are acceptable to support registration ot 38167-5. 4. SuL~it tive (5) covies OE your tinal printed labeling before you release tlu~ product for 6hipJCent. Reter to the 1;.-79 Enclc.sure: tor a l:urthe.c description OE tinal printed labeling. It these conditions are not comv1ied with, the registration will be subject to cancellation in accol:dance with FIFRA section 6(e). Your release for shipntent 01 the product constitutes acceptance ot these conditions. '\ v.tamped copy at the label 18 enclosed for your records. Robert J. Taylor Product Manager (25) Fungicide-Herbicide &ranch Registration Division (TS-767C) Enclosures •• ",>l :: '1J .., SETRE CHEMICAL COMPANY .., " , . - ):. , ',. .. ~ Suite 3200 - Clark Tower .-----------------, 5100 Poplar Avenue Ace E P '"[' E D' Memphis, Tennessee 38117 ({)- etJnvw<.<J : (901) 761-0050 FEB 2 51986 ACTIVE INGREDIENT (C Cyanazine: 2-chloro-4-(l-cyano-l-methylethylamino)- 6-ethyl-amino-s-triazine ••••••••••••••• 43.0% INERT INGREDIENTS •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• _..;5~7!.-'..• ..:::O~%~_ TOTAL 100.0% This product contains 4 Ibs. cyanazine per gallon. KEEP'OUT OF.REACH OF CHILDREN WARNING SEE ADDITIONAL PRECAUTIONS ON SIDE PANEL ftI'>, ~' EPA EST. NO. NET CONTENTS EPA REG. NO. MANUFACTURED BY SETRE CHEMICAL COMPANY MEMPHIS, TN. 38137 • •••••• ,•" • • • " " • ••••••• • < •• "• . ••••• • .. • • • ''''1 ••••• I (0 I I • • ••••• • , • • • • • •• , , •••••• " • •• • .. • . ..., • " • -. j. ( ' .. ~. ..... -... ,......... .,........ -... ' , ,ii nbc d d ''$fj)il.;+ ;::. • 1" I . "., .. .------------------------------------~I PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENTS Hazards to Humans and Domestic Animals WARNING May be fatal if swallowed .• Causes eye irritation. Harmful if inhaled or absorbed through skin. Avoid contact with skin, eyes, or clothing. Wash thoroughly with soap and water after handling·and before eating or smoking. Avoid breathing spray mist. Remove contaminated clothing and wash before reuse. Keep out of reach of domestic animals, particularly cattle. Consumption of this product, spray solution, or water contaminated with product can result in serious i~lness or possible death of bovines. STATEMENT OF PRACTICAL TREATMENT If swallowed, drink one or two glasses of water immediately ( and induce vomiting by sticking finger down back of throat. In case of contact, immediately flush eyes or skin with p]~nty of water. Get medical attention if irritation persists. ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS Keep out of lakes, streams or ponds. Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of wastes • . , DIRECTIONS FOR USE l4 r It is a violation of Federal Law to use this product in a manner inconsistent· with its labeling. ( STORAGE AND DISPOSAL •t Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage or disposal. Do not use or store around the home environment. Pesticide Disposal: Wastes resulting from the use of this product may be disposed of on site or at an approved waste disposal facility. ,. , • ••••• .. , • ••• Ccntainer Disposal: Triple rinse (or equivalent). Then ofler' •••••• for recycling or reconditioning, or puncture and dispose Qf '. • •• • in a sanitary landf ill, or incineration, or, if allowed b'1 0 •• 0 •••••• • state and local authorities, by burning. If burned, stay o~o ••••• of smoke. • ••••• o 00.•• • 00 0 • • •0 ••0 00 0 " GENERAL INFORMATIOll FOR USE ON CORN _ 4 •• ". \.' ·CYANAZINE 4L Herbicide is a selective preemergence herbicide for the .control of annual grasses and broadleaved weeds in field corn. CYANAZINE 4L may also be used preemergence in ." 'J .• '~':'" certain tank-mix combinations with other herbicides as described below. When CYANAZINE 4L is used alone or in combination with Sutan +, Eradicane, Alachlor (Lasso), or Paraquat, as directed on this label, there is no herbicide carryover which interferes with succeeding crops, and the user can rotate from corn to other crops. 11hen CYANAZINE 4L is used in combination with atrazine, however, only corn or sorghum may be planted the following year. 11hen CYANAZINE 4L is used in combination with Dual, refer to the Dual label for precautions on . , rotational crops. ( As a preemergence herbicide, CYANAZINE 4L is active mainly through the roots; and therefore, its effect on ,~eeds is dependent on adequate rainfall to move the herbicide into the root zone. A rotary hoeing or shallow cultivation is recommended if a rainfall or sprinkler irrigation has not occurred within about ten days after application of CYANAZINE 4L alone, as a tank-mix or as a sequential application. Moisture should be sufficient to wet the top 1 1/2 to 2 inches of soil or make the soil too wet to cultivate; for most soils one-half inch of moisture is sufficient. J Under conditions _~hich delay weed germination, such as low temperature, lac~ of soil surface moisture, or when germ­ ination extends over a long period, the effectiveness of the herbicide may be impaired. Rotary 'hoeing, a shallow cUltivation or a postemergence herbicide treatment may be ::If benefit under ( these circumstances. If the corn is cultivated, tillage should be shallow to minimize herbicide dilution in the soil. CYANAZINE 4L is not effective when used preemergence on peat or muck soils. Do not use CYANAZINE 4L on sands or loamy sands (soils consisting of more than 70% sand) containing less than 1% organic matter. CYANAZINE 4L should be applied only once per crop season. Observe all cautions and limitations on labeling of all products used in mixtures. The effectiveness of any combination is •••••• generally dependent on weed spectrum, soil texture, ana's6Ll : .: organic matter content. Suggested rates for CYANAZINE 4L :alone":": and all tank-mix combinations of CYANAZINE 4L with oth~f Qerbici~~s can be found in rate tables contained in this label. :' ,,' ":", ••••• .t C. ( C , APPLICATION DIRECTIONS c: CI ( • • General Mixing and Spraying Directions .. , . • •••••, .. , ,t. c •• c. •• Be sure the sprayer tank, boom and nozzles have been thbr6ugh~',.' flushed with clean water if another pesticide has been,~gefi previously. ... • ,.' " 7 Sufficient jet or mechanical agitation should be provided during the filling operation and during application to keep the tank mix combination uniformly suspended. Fill the spray tank At least one-half full of clean water and while pump and agitator are running, add the recommended amount of CYANAZINE 4L to the tank, then fill with water to the desired level. For tank mixes, Once the CYANAZINE 4L is completely suspended in the water, add the recommended amount of atrazine, Sutan +, Eradicane 6.7E, alachlor (Lasso) 4EC, Dual 8E, or Paraquat CL to the tank while filling with water to the desired level. For tank mixes with atrazine 80W, completely suspend the atrazine in water prior to adding CYANAZINE 4L. Nitrogen solutions or complete liquid fertilizer may replace all or part of the water as carrier.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MN2000 FSAC 006 Revised1978.Pdf
    -i .., ,,, (I-,~-- -' d ~-- C:::- ,, AG RIC UL TURAL EXTENSION SERVICE Afr{ ,<"·<,'>· , -> ',' "\, '. '' ~'¥) AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS FACT SHEET No. 6-1978 Chemicals for'Weed Cop: GERALD R. MILLER . \~:::sr" This fact sheet is intended only as a summary of suggested Herbicide names and formulations alternative chemicals for weed control in corn. Label informa­ Common Trade Concentration and tion should be read and followed exactly. For further informa­ name name commercial formulation 1 tion, see Extension Bulletin 400, Cultural and Chemical Weed Control in Field Crops. Alachlor Lasso 4 lb/gal L Lasso 11 15% G Selection of an effective chemical or combination of chemicals Atrazine AAtrex, 80% WP, 4 lb/gal L should be based on consideration of the following factors: others 80%WP -Clearance status of the chemical Atrazine and propachlor AAtram 20% G -Use of the crop Bentazon Basagran 4 lb/gal L -Potential for soil residues that may affect following crops Butylate and protectant Sutan+ 6.7 lb/gal L -Kinds of weeds Cyanazine Bladex 80% WP, 15% G, 4 lb/gal L -Soil texture Dicamba Banvel 4 lb/gal L -pH of soil Dicamba and 2,4-D Banvel-K 1.25 lb/gal dicamba -Amount of organic matter in the soil 2.50 lb/gal 2,4-D -Formulation of the chemical EPTC and protectant Eradicane 6.7 lb/gal L -Application equipment available Linuron Lorox 50%WP -Potential for drift problems Metolachlor Dual 6 lb/gal L Propachlor Bexton, 65% WP, 20% G, 4 lb/gal L Ramrod 2,4-D Several Various 1 G = granular, L = liquid, WP= wettable powder Effectiveness of herbicides on
    [Show full text]
  • 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid
    2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid IUPAC (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid name 2,4-D Other hedonal names trinoxol Identifiers CAS [94-75-7] number SMILES OC(COC1=CC=C(Cl)C=C1Cl)=O ChemSpider 1441 ID Properties Molecular C H Cl O formula 8 6 2 3 Molar mass 221.04 g mol−1 Appearance white to yellow powder Melting point 140.5 °C (413.5 K) Boiling 160 °C (0.4 mm Hg) point Solubility in 900 mg/L (25 °C) water Related compounds Related 2,4,5-T, Dichlorprop compounds Except where noted otherwise, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C, 100 kPa) 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is a common systemic herbicide used in the control of broadleaf weeds. It is the most widely used herbicide in the world, and the third most commonly used in North America.[1] 2,4-D is also an important synthetic auxin, often used in laboratories for plant research and as a supplement in plant cell culture media such as MS medium. History 2,4-D was developed during World War II by a British team at Rothamsted Experimental Station, under the leadership of Judah Hirsch Quastel, aiming to increase crop yields for a nation at war.[citation needed] When it was commercially released in 1946, it became the first successful selective herbicide and allowed for greatly enhanced weed control in wheat, maize (corn), rice, and similar cereal grass crop, because it only kills dicots, leaving behind monocots. Mechanism of herbicide action 2,4-D is a synthetic auxin, which is a class of plant growth regulators.
    [Show full text]
  • Herbicide Mode of Action Table High Resistance Risk
    Herbicide Mode of Action Table High resistance risk Chemical family Active constituent (first registered trade name) GROUP 1 Inhibition of acetyl co-enzyme A carboxylase (ACC’ase inhibitors) clodinafop (Topik®), cyhalofop (Agixa®*, Barnstorm®), diclofop (Cheetah® Gold* Decision®*, Hoegrass®), Aryloxyphenoxy- fenoxaprop (Cheetah®, Gold*, Wildcat®), fluazifop propionates (FOPs) (Fusilade®), haloxyfop (Verdict®), propaquizafop (Shogun®), quizalofop (Targa®) Cyclohexanediones (DIMs) butroxydim (Factor®*), clethodim (Select®), profoxydim (Aura®), sethoxydim (Cheetah® Gold*, Decision®*), tralkoxydim (Achieve®) Phenylpyrazoles (DENs) pinoxaden (Axial®) GROUP 2 Inhibition of acetolactate synthase (ALS inhibitors), acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS) Imidazolinones (IMIs) imazamox (Intervix®*, Raptor®), imazapic (Bobcat I-Maxx®*, Flame®, Midas®*, OnDuty®*), imazapyr (Arsenal Xpress®*, Intervix®*, Lightning®*, Midas®* OnDuty®*), imazethapyr (Lightning®*, Spinnaker®) Pyrimidinyl–thio- bispyribac (Nominee®), pyrithiobac (Staple®) benzoates Sulfonylureas (SUs) azimsulfuron (Gulliver®), bensulfuron (Londax®), chlorsulfuron (Glean®), ethoxysulfuron (Hero®), foramsulfuron (Tribute®), halosulfuron (Sempra®), iodosulfuron (Hussar®), mesosulfuron (Atlantis®), metsulfuron (Ally®, Harmony®* M, Stinger®*, Trounce®*, Ultimate Brushweed®* Herbicide), prosulfuron (Casper®*), rimsulfuron (Titus®), sulfometuron (Oust®, Eucmix Pre Plant®*, Trimac Plus®*), sulfosulfuron (Monza®), thifensulfuron (Harmony®* M), triasulfuron (Logran®, Logran® B-Power®*), tribenuron (Express®),
    [Show full text]
  • Special Report 354 April 1972 Agricultural Experiment Station
    ORTMAL DO ;10T REMOVE 7.9 m FILE Special Report 354 April 1972 Agricultural Experiment Station Oregon State University, Corvallis I FIELD APPLICATION OF HERBICIDES--AVOIDING DANGER TO FISH Erland T. Juntunen Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon and Logan A. Norris Pacific Northwest Forestry Sciences Laboratory and Range Experiment Station Forest Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture Corvallis, Oregon April, 1972 Trade names are used in this publication solely to provide specific information. No endorsement of products is intended nor is criticism implieLl to products mentioned or omitted. Recommendations are not made concerning safe use of products nor is any guarantee or warranty of results or effects of the products intended or implied. ii Chemical weed and brush control with herbicides is an important land management practice in modern agriculture and forestry. In some cases, herbicides are applied directly to bodies of water for aquatic weed control. More commonly, herbicides are applied to lands adjacent to waterways for general weed and brush control. The responsible applicator will avoid damage to fishery resources by being fully aware of a particular herbicides potential hazard to fish. Herbicide applications should be considered hazardous to fish when there is the probability fish will be exposed to herbicide concen- trations which are harmful. This bulletin offers information that will aid in selecting the particular herbicides and formulations of least hazard to fish considering the toxicity of the herbicide and the poten- tial for its entry into streams, lakes, or ponds. Entry of Herbicides into the Aquatic Environment In aquatic weed control, the effective concentration of herbicide in the water depends on the rate of application, the rate of the spread of the chemical, the size and chemical composition of the body of water, the rate of degradation or adsorption of the chemical on sediments, and the rate of mixing of treated water with untreated water.
    [Show full text]
  • INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES
    US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs INDEX to PESTICIDE TYPES and FAMILIES and PART 180 TOLERANCE INFORMATION of PESTICIDE CHEMICALS in FOOD and FEED COMMODITIES Note: Pesticide tolerance information is updated in the Code of Federal Regulations on a weekly basis. EPA plans to update these indexes biannually. These indexes are current as of the date indicated in the pdf file. For the latest information on pesticide tolerances, please check the electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR) at http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_07/40cfrv23_07.html 1 40 CFR Type Family Common name CAS Number PC code 180.163 Acaricide bridged diphenyl Dicofol (1,1-Bis(chlorophenyl)-2,2,2-trichloroethanol) 115-32-2 10501 180.198 Acaricide phosphonate Trichlorfon 52-68-6 57901 180.259 Acaricide sulfite ester Propargite 2312-35-8 97601 180.446 Acaricide tetrazine Clofentezine 74115-24-5 125501 180.448 Acaricide thiazolidine Hexythiazox 78587-05-0 128849 180.517 Acaricide phenylpyrazole Fipronil 120068-37-3 129121 180.566 Acaricide pyrazole Fenpyroximate 134098-61-6 129131 180.572 Acaricide carbazate Bifenazate 149877-41-8 586 180.593 Acaricide unclassified Etoxazole 153233-91-1 107091 180.599 Acaricide unclassified Acequinocyl 57960-19-7 6329 180.341 Acaricide, fungicide dinitrophenol Dinocap (2, 4-Dinitro-6-octylphenyl crotonate and 2,6-dinitro-4- 39300-45-3 36001 octylphenyl crotonate} 180.111 Acaricide, insecticide organophosphorus Malathion 121-75-5 57701 180.182 Acaricide, insecticide cyclodiene Endosulfan 115-29-7 79401
    [Show full text]
  • Weed Control in Corn Tjay 11 1932 Gerald R
    MN d-ooo E-f- b'-f/ EXTENSION FOLDER 641-1982 Weed Control in Corn tJAY 11 1932 Gerald R. Miller, Extension Agronomist Richard Behrens, Professor, Agronomy and Plant Genetics Weed control in corn should be based on an optimum com­ or preemergence herbicides have been applied, unless a prop­ bination of cultural, mechanical, and chemical practices. The erly timed postemergence herbicide treatment is planned. ideal combination for each field will depend on several factors Set cultivators for shallow operation to avoid pruning the including crop being grown, kinds of weeds, severity of the corn roots and to reduce the number of weed seeds brought weed infestation, soil characteristics, tillage practices, cropping to the surface. Throw enough soil into the row to cover small systems, and availability of time and labor. weeds, but avoid excessive ridging that may encourage erosion or interfere with harvesting. Shallow cultivation should be re­ Cultural Practices peated as necessary to control newly germinated weeds. Cultural practices for weed control in corn include seedbed preparation, establishing an optimum stand, adequate fertility, Herbicides and timely cultivations. Weeds that germinate before planting When selecting an appropriate herbicide or combination of can be destroyed with tillage operations or herbicides. Killing herbicide treatments, consider carefully the following factors: weeds just before planting gives the young crop seedlings a -Label approval for use competitive advantage and often improves performance of -Use of the crop preplanting or preemergence herbicides. -Corn tolerance to the herbicide Early cultivations are most effective for killing weeds and -Potential for chemical residues that may affect later crops for preventing crop yield reduction due to weed competition -Kinds of weeds or corn root damage.
    [Show full text]
  • AP-42, CH 9.2.2: Pesticide Application
    9.2.2PesticideApplication 9.2.2.1General1-2 Pesticidesaresubstancesormixturesusedtocontrolplantandanimallifeforthepurposesof increasingandimprovingagriculturalproduction,protectingpublichealthfrompest-bornediseaseand discomfort,reducingpropertydamagecausedbypests,andimprovingtheaestheticqualityofoutdoor orindoorsurroundings.Pesticidesareusedwidelyinagriculture,byhomeowners,byindustry,andby governmentagencies.Thelargestusageofchemicalswithpesticidalactivity,byweightof"active ingredient"(AI),isinagriculture.Agriculturalpesticidesareusedforcost-effectivecontrolofweeds, insects,mites,fungi,nematodes,andotherthreatstotheyield,quality,orsafetyoffood.Theannual U.S.usageofpesticideAIs(i.e.,insecticides,herbicides,andfungicides)isover800millionpounds. AiremissionsfrompesticideusearisebecauseofthevolatilenatureofmanyAIs,solvents, andotheradditivesusedinformulations,andofthedustynatureofsomeformulations.Mostmodern pesticidesareorganiccompounds.EmissionscanresultdirectlyduringapplicationorastheAIor solventvolatilizesovertimefromsoilandvegetation.Thisdiscussionwillfocusonemissionfactors forvolatilization.Thereareinsufficientdataavailableonparticulateemissionstopermitemission factordevelopment. 9.2.2.2ProcessDescription3-6 ApplicationMethods- Pesticideapplicationmethodsvaryaccordingtothetargetpestandtothecroporothervalue tobeprotected.Insomecases,thepesticideisapplieddirectlytothepest,andinotherstothehost plant.Instillothers,itisusedonthesoilorinanenclosedairspace.Pesticidemanufacturershave developedvariousformulationsofAIstomeetboththepestcontrolneedsandthepreferred
    [Show full text]
  • Chemic~L$,·!9R~:W,Eed Control in Corn GERALD R
    n:N J 600 AGRICUL TUJ:lAL EXTENSION SERVICE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA \ \ .. _., .-·· .. -.~1~-.-~~rr-:1 AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS \ -· _.;-,< ,. •-- . FACT SHEET No. 6-Revised 1979 Chemic~l$,·!9r~:w,eed Control in Corn GERALD R. MILLER \,_,.,, .... This fact sheet is intended only as a summary of suggested alter­ Herbicide -names and formulations native chemicals for weed control in corn. Label information Common Trade Concentration and should be read and followed exactly. For further information, name name commercial formulation 1 see Extension Bulletin 400, Cultural and Chemical Weed Control in Field Crops. Alachlor Lasso 4 lb/gal L Lasso II 15%G Selection of an effective chemical or combination of chemicals Atrazine Mtrex, 80% WP, 4 lb/gal L should be based on consideration of the following factors: others 90% WDG -Clearance status of the chemical Atrazine and propachlor Mtram 20%G -Use of the crop Bentazon Basagran 4 lb/gal L -Potential for soil residues that may affect following crops Butylate and protectant Sutan+ 6.7 lb/gal L -Kinds of weeds Cyanazine Bladex 80%WP, 15%G, 4 lb/gal L -Soil texture Dicamba Banvel 4 lb/gal L -pH of soil Dicamba and 2, 4-D Banvel-K 1.25 lb/gal dicamba -Amount of organic matter in the soil 2.50 lb/gal 2,4-D -Formulation of the chemical EPTC and protectant Eradicane 6.7 lb/gal L -Application equipment available Linuron Lorox 50%WP -Potential for drift problems Metolachlor Dual 6 or 8 lb/gal L Pendimethalin Prowl 4 lb/gal L Propachlor Sexton, 65% WP, 20% G, 4 lb/gal L Ramrod 2,4-D several various ·t G = Granular, L = Liquid, WP=Wettable Powder, WDG =Water Dispers­ Effectiveness of herbicides on weeds in corn 1 sible Granule Preplanting Preemergence C Postemergence -;;;..
    [Show full text]
  • List of Herbicide Groups
    List of herbicides Group Scientific name Trade name clodinafop (Topik®), cyhalofop (Barnstorm®), diclofop (Cheetah® Gold*, Decision®*, Hoegrass®), fenoxaprop (Cheetah® Gold* , Wildcat®), A Aryloxyphenoxypropionates fluazifop (Fusilade®, Fusion®*), haloxyfop (Verdict®), propaquizafop (Shogun®), quizalofop (Targa®) butroxydim (Falcon®, Fusion®*), clethodim (Select®), profoxydim A Cyclohexanediones (Aura®), sethoxydim (Cheetah® Gold*, Decision®*), tralkoxydim (Achieve®) A Phenylpyrazoles pinoxaden (Axial®) azimsulfuron (Gulliver®), bensulfuron (Londax®), chlorsulfuron (Glean®), ethoxysulfuron (Hero®), foramsulfuron (Tribute®), halosulfuron (Sempra®), iodosulfuron (Hussar®), mesosulfuron (Atlantis®), metsulfuron (Ally®, Harmony®* M, Stinger®*, Trounce®*, B Sulfonylureas Ultimate Brushweed®* Herbicide), prosulfuron (Casper®*), rimsulfuron (Titus®), sulfometuron (Oust®, Eucmix Pre Plant®*), sulfosulfuron (Monza®), thifensulfuron (Harmony®* M), triasulfuron, (Logran®, Logran® B Power®*), tribenuron (Express®), trifloxysulfuron (Envoke®, Krismat®*) florasulam (Paradigm®*, Vortex®*, X-Pand®*), flumetsulam B Triazolopyrimidines (Broadstrike®), metosulam (Eclipse®), pyroxsulam (Crusader®Rexade®*) imazamox (Intervix®*, Raptor®,), imazapic (Bobcat I-Maxx®*, Flame®, Midas®*, OnDuty®*), imazapyr (Arsenal Xpress®*, Intervix®*, B Imidazolinones Lightning®*, Midas®*, OnDuty®*), imazethapyr (Lightning®*, Spinnaker®) B Pyrimidinylthiobenzoates bispyribac (Nominee®), pyrithiobac (Staple®) C Amides: propanil (Stam®) C Benzothiadiazinones: bentazone (Basagran®,
    [Show full text]
  • Pesticides in Iowa's Water Resources: Historical Trends and New Issues
    PesticidesPesticides inin IowaIowa’’ss WaterWater Resources:Resources: HistoricalHistorical TrendsTrends andand NewNew IssuesIssues MaryMary P.P. SkopecSkopec andand KatieKatie ForemanForeman WatershedWatershed MonitoringMonitoring andand AssessmentAssessment IowaIowa DepartmentDepartment ofof NaturalNatural ResourcesResources OutlineOutline PesticidePesticide UseUse inin IowaIowa CurrentCurrent StatusStatus andand HistoricalHistorical TrendsTrends NewNew ApproachesApproaches forfor UnderstandingUnderstanding Occurrence of Pesticides in Water Resources Function of: 1. Use 2. Soil Characteristics 3. Rainfall Timing and Amount 4. Pesticide Properties Land Use in Iowa (2002) Percent of Iowa Acres Treated Herbicides Insecticides Yes No Source: Pesticide Movement: What Farmers Need to Know, Iowa State Extension, PAT-36 2000, Non-City Stream Sites 2001, Non-City Stream Sites 2002, Non-City Stream Sites 2,4-D* 2,4,5-T* Acetochlor Acifluoren* Alachlor Ametryn Atrazine Atrazine, Deethyl Atrazine, Deisopropyl Bentazon* Bromacil* Some Bromoxynil* Butylate Very Chloramben* Cyanazine Dalapon* Common; Herbicides Dicamba* Dichloprop* Others Dimethenamid EPTC Less so Metolachlor Metribuzin Pendimethalin* Picloram* Prometon Propachlor Propazine Simazine Triclopyr* Trifluralin Carbaryl* Carbofuran* Chlordane* Chlorpyrifos* es DDD* DDE* id DDT* Few ic Diazinon* ct Dieldrin* Detects Fonofos* Lindane (gamma-BHC)* Inse Malathion* Parathion* Phorate* 0 204060801000 204060801000 20406080100 Detection Rate, in Percent Detection Rate, in Percent Detection Rate,
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Minnesota Chemicals of High Concern List
    Minnesota Department of Health, Chemicals of High Concern List, 2019 Persistent, Bioaccumulative, Toxic (PBT) or very Persistent, very High Production CAS Bioaccumulative Use Example(s) and/or Volume (HPV) Number Chemical Name Health Endpoint(s) (vPvB) Source(s) Chemical Class Chemical1 Maine (CA Prop 65; IARC; IRIS; NTP Wood and textiles finishes, Cancer, Respiratory 11th ROC); WA Appen1; WA CHCC; disinfection, tissue 50-00-0 Formaldehyde x system, Eye irritant Minnesota HRV; Minnesota RAA preservative Gastrointestinal Minnesota HRL Contaminant 50-00-0 Formaldehyde (in water) system EU Category 1 Endocrine disruptor pesticide 50-29-3 DDT, technical, p,p'DDT Endocrine system Maine (CA Prop 65; IARC; IRIS; NTP PAH (chem-class) 11th ROC; OSPAR Chemicals of Concern; EuC Endocrine Disruptor Cancer, Endocrine Priority List; EPA Final PBT Rule for 50-32-8 Benzo(a)pyrene x x system TRI; EPA Priority PBT); Oregon P3 List; WA Appen1; Minnesota HRV WA Appen1; Minnesota HRL Dyes and diaminophenol mfg, wood preservation, 51-28-5 2,4-Dinitrophenol Eyes pesticide, pharmaceutical Maine (CA Prop 65; IARC; NTP 11th Preparation of amino resins, 51-79-6 Urethane (Ethyl carbamate) Cancer, Development ROC); WA Appen1 solubilizer, chemical intermediate Maine (CA Prop 65; IARC; IRIS; NTP Research; PAH (chem-class) 11th ROC; EPA Final PBT Rule for 53-70-3 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene Cancer x TRI; WA PBT List; OSPAR Chemicals of Concern); WA Appen1; Oregon P3 List Maine (CA Prop 65; NTP 11th ROC); Research 53-96-3 2-Acetylaminofluorene Cancer WA Appen1 Maine (CA Prop 65; IARC; IRIS; NTP Lubricant, antioxidant, 55-18-5 N-Nitrosodiethylamine Cancer 11th ROC); WA Appen1 plastics stabilizer Maine (CA Prop 65; IRIS; NTP 11th Pesticide (EPA reg.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classification 2019 Theinternational Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) Was Established in 1980
    The WHO Recommended Classi cation of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classi cation 2019 cation Hazard of Pesticides by and Guidelines to Classi The WHO Recommended Classi The WHO Recommended Classi cation of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classi cation 2019 The WHO Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classification 2019 TheInternational Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) was established in 1980. The overall objectives of the IPCS are to establish the scientific basis for assessment of the risk to human health and the environment from exposure to chemicals, through international peer review processes, as a prerequisite for the promotion of chemical safety, and to provide technical assistance in strengthening national capacities for the sound management of chemicals. This publication was developed in the IOMC context. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views or stated policies of individual IOMC Participating Organizations. The Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals (IOMC) was established in 1995 following recommendations made by the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development to strengthen cooperation and increase international coordination in the field of chemical safety. The Participating Organizations are: FAO, ILO, UNDP, UNEP, UNIDO, UNITAR, WHO, World Bank and OECD. The purpose of the IOMC is to promote coordination of the policies and activities pursued by the Participating Organizations, jointly or separately, to achieve the sound management of chemicals in relation to human health and the environment. WHO recommended classification of pesticides by hazard and guidelines to classification, 2019 edition ISBN 978-92-4-000566-2 (electronic version) ISBN 978-92-4-000567-9 (print version) ISSN 1684-1042 © World Health Organization 2020 Some rights reserved.
    [Show full text]