Soldiers Against the War

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Soldiers Against the War SOLDIERS AGAINST THE WAR The story of Pvt. Andrew Stapp loc and the Fort Sill Gl's The Committee for GI Rights was formed to defend Pvt. Andrew Stapp and other soldiers at The Stapp Case Fort Sill, Oklahoma who are being harassed and Private Andrew D. Stapp was courtmartialed penalized for their opposition to the Vietnam war. on June 1, 1967 and sentenced to 45 days uncon- It offers help to all servicemen who want legal fined hard labor, forfeiture of 20 days' pay and or practical assistance in exercising their rights. reduction of rank by one grade for refusing to surrender anti-war literature in his footlocker. The Committee for GI Rights can help anti­ The trial, jammed with newsmen and supporters, war GI's^ in two ways: received national and world-wide publicity be­ cause of Pvt. Stapp's militant stand on the war 1) by helping them secure legal defense in case and because of a dramatic courtroom demon­ of prosecution and » stration in his support carried out by a dele­ 2) by providing them with all the assistance gation from Youth Against War & Fascism. they need to prganize their fellow soldiers against the war. The Committee has already Ever since his induction into the Army in sent literature to many soldiers at the request May, 1966 Andy Stapp has made his anti-war of the Fort Sill Gl's. This literature includes views known. A draftee from Merion Station, Pa., Bertrand Russell's "Appeal to the American he had been one of the early draft-card burners Conscience," the novel "Johnny Got His Gun," at Penn State. He continued to receive and read and other writings that the Gl's themselves feel a wide variety of anti-war and radical publica­ have the greatest impact on men in the service. tions after his induction, and to discuss the character of the war with his fellow soldiers. Most important of all, the many young men In September, 1966 the military made its first who find themselves drafted and want to express move to intimidate him. Military security police their opinions openly about the war need to know removed a great many radical books and pam­ that they are not alone; that there is an organiza­ phlets from his footlocker, with the promise that tion specifically set up to come to their aid. In they would be returned. They never were, and the first few weeks since its founding, the Com­ Stapp continued to order and subscribe to pub­ mittee for GI Rights has already been in touch lications that he felt contained useful information with dozens of Gl's who want this kind of on the character of the war and the military assistance. establishment. In October Stapp was assigned to Head­ of David Rein, attorney for the Emergency Civil quarters Battery, 2nd Battalion, 2nd Artillery Liberties Committee who came from Washington at Fort Sill. In early May, 1967 the brass again to represent the anti-war GI. came to his barracks and asked for his literature. This time Andy Stapp said he would only show Also present were seven members of Youth it to them, but would not surrender it without a Against War & Fascism, who had driven from guarantee that the material would be returned. New York after being contacted by Stapp. In the The battery commander, Lt. John W. Urquhart, delegation was the National Coordinator, „ refused to give this assurance. The lieutenant Maryann Weissman. Earlier the Chairman of returned later with a sergeant, had the foot­ YAWF, Key Martin, and Eddie Oquendo, leader locker broken open with a pickax, and confiscated of Blacks Against Negative Dying (BAND), had the books and pamphlets. v also been on the base. At roll call on the day of the trial, all the Stapp was penalized for having a broken foot­ members of Andy's barracks were instructed locker, (!) and then charged with refusing to not to go near the courtroom or any of the YAWF obey an order. Offered with the choice of taking delegation. In spite of this, five of Andy's GI an Article 15 — accepting a minor penalty without buddies attended the courtmartial, and other contest — he insisted on a summary courtmartial soldiers in the area made a point of exchanging where he could defend the right of Gl's to free pleasantries with the demonstrators. All were speech. later tagged for investigation by military intelli­ gence, and some were given penalties. The Army claimed that Stapp had refused to obey an order; Stapp and his attorney argued that the order was illegal, since it infringed the The Courtmartial First Amendment rights of free speech. The law In a summary courtmartial, the presiding officer refused to concede this point. law officer is prosecutor, judge and jury. Captain Daniel Bartholomew would also have been de­ In the course of the accusing testimony given fense attorney, had it not been for the presence by the lieutenant and sergeant who broke open the footlocker, a serious discrepancy arose. right of revolutionary socialists to While Lt. Urquhart claimed to have originated organize within the Army against the order himself, the sergeant testified that America's imperialist war of ag­ the order to seize the literature had come from gression in Vietnam. the battalion commander, Lt. Col. John W. Price. On recall, Lt. Urquhart admitted that this was "We Gl's say this is not our war, true. Since, under military law an officer trying it is Wall Street's war. To cite an a courtmartial cannot make a judgment on the example: Dow Chemical stocks have legality», or illegality of an order issued by a soared as a result of the 25 million superior officer, this should have invalidated pounds of napalm it sells each month the proceeding. However, after many recesses to the military forces in Vietnam. At called by Captain Bartholomew to Consult his the same time the death toll of commander, the law officer ignored the discre­ American Gl's has risen in propor­ pancy in Lt. Urquhart's testimony — a decision tion to profits and has now reached which provoked the greatest indignation among the new high last week alone of 337. the watching Gl's, and was the cause of an One is haunted by the thought that incident to be described later. such companies as Dow profit by the use of napalm, whose only tar­ At issue in the case was not only Private get is man and has killed our fellow Stapp's right to read what he chose, but also the Gl's (16 Gl's of the First Infantry right of Gl's to organize and express themselves Division last fall) and innumerable against the war. In his statement to the court, Vietnamese. later released to newsmen, Andrew Stapp de­ clared: "Such thoughts prey on our minds and we begin to question and seek "I refused to let them take my answers. Many men in the unit are literature because the First Amend­ opposed to the war and have liter­ ment to the Constitution of the United ature similar to that which was in States guarantees the right of all my footlocker. I was singled out Americans to free speech. This at random for punishment as an guarantee certainly includes the example to others for the purpose of "Until you abolish both the Special The Demonstration Court and the Summary Court you won't have true justice under the The delivery of this statement was greeted military code...You have one offi­ with enthusiastic applause by the YAWF dele­ cer, who is judge, jury and prose­ gation present in the courtroom, to the great cutor and he always finds the man dismay ^of Captain Bartholomew and the brass. guilty...What a man reads is none A recess was called while the Captain again of his commanding officer's damn had time to consult his commanding officer on business. Putting on a uniform the verdict, and then the last portion of the trial doesn't mean giving up one's con­ in the little stuffy courtroom was resumed. stitutional rights." \ i Remarks of Attorney When the verdict of guilty was pronounced, Hyman M. Greenstein, the seven members of YAWF denounced it in what invited speaker at seminar was probably the first anti-war demonstration of the American Trial Law­ conducted during a courtmartial. Maryann yers Association, June 3,1967 Weissman got up and spoke for five minutes supporting the right of Gl's to organize, and intimidation. The ruling class needs protesting the court's ruling as "a verdict robots in its army, but we refuse of fear — fear that the nature of the imper­ to be unthinking cannon fodder. ialist war in Vietnam is being understood by the Gl's." Her statement was followed by "We are learning every day that the chanting of anti-war slogans. until the criminal capitalist system which breeds war, racism and Captain Bartholomew seemed uncertain how poverty is replaced by socialism the to handle the demonstrators. After an initial working class youth of America will attempt to remove them, he went on to read be impressed into the imperialist the sentence and complete the necessary legal army and forced to die for Wall forms (a 20-minute job) while the chanting Street profits in Asia, Africa, and echoed across the base and a crowd of soldiers Latin America." began to gather outside the courtroom. Within minutes of the close of this court- U.S., I sought further information. martial, a second soldier was arrested for I read everything I could about the "insulting an officer." Pfc.
Recommended publications
  • Soldiers and Veterans Against the War
    Vietnam Generation Volume 2 Number 1 GI Resistance: Soldiers and Veterans Article 1 Against the War 1-1990 GI Resistance: Soldiers and Veterans Against the War Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/vietnamgeneration Part of the American Studies Commons Recommended Citation (1990) "GI Resistance: Soldiers and Veterans Against the War," Vietnam Generation: Vol. 2 : No. 1 , Article 1. Available at: http://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/vietnamgeneration/vol2/iss1/1 This Complete Volume is brought to you for free and open access by La Salle University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vietnam Generation by an authorized editor of La Salle University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GI RESISTANCE: S o l d ie r s a n d V e t e r a n s AGAINST THE WAR Victim am Generation Vietnam Generation was founded in 1988 to promote and encourage interdisciplinary study of the Vietnam War era and the Vietnam War generation. The journal is published by Vietnam Generation, Inc., a nonprofit corporation devoted to promoting scholarship on recent history and contemporary issues. ViETNAM G en eratio n , In c . ViCE-pRESidENT PRESidENT SECRETARY, TREASURER Herman Beavers Kali Tal Cindy Fuchs Vietnam G eneration Te c HnIc a I A s s is t a n c e EdiTOR: Kali Tal Lawrence E. Hunter AdvisoRy BoARd NANCY ANISFIELD MICHAEL KLEIN RUTH ROSEN Champlain College University of Ulster UC Davis KEVIN BOWEN GABRIEL KOLKO WILLIAM J. SEARLE William Joiner Center York University Eastern Illinois University University of Massachusetts JACQUELINE LAWSON JAMES C.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam War on Trial: the Court-Martial of Dr. Howard B. Levy
    Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons Faculty Publications 1994 Vietnam War on Trial: The Court-Martial of Dr. Howard B. Levy Robert N. Strassfeld Case Western Reserve University - School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Military, War, and Peace Commons Repository Citation Strassfeld, Robert N., "Vietnam War on Trial: The Court-Martial of Dr. Howard B. Levy" (1994). Faculty Publications. 551. https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/faculty_publications/551 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. TilE VIETNAM WAR ON TRIAL: TilE COURT-MARTIAL OF DR. HOWARD B. LEVY ROBERT N. STRASSFELD• This Article examines the history of a Vietnam War-era case: the court-martial of Dr. Howard B. Levy. The U.S. Army court-martialled Dr. Levy for refusing to teach medicine to Green Beret soldiers and for criticizing both the Green Berets and American involvement in Vietnam. Although the Supreme Court eventually upheld Levy's convicti on in Parkerv. Levy, ill decision obscures the political content of Levy's court-martial and its relationshipto the war. At the court-martialLe vy sought to defend himself by showing that his disparaging remarks about the Green Berets, identifying them as "killers of peasants and murderers of women and children," were true and that his refusal to teach medicine to Green Beret soldiers was dictated by medical ethics, given the ways in which the soldiers would misuse their medical knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Found, Featured, Then Forgotten: U.S. Network TV News and the Vietnam Veterans Against the War © 2011 by Mark D
    Found, Featured, then Forgotten Image created by Jack Miller. Courtesy of Vietnam Veterans Against the War. Found, Featured, then Forgotten U.S. Network TV News and the Vietnam Veterans Against the War Mark D. Harmon Newfound Press THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE LIBRARIES, KNOXVILLE Found, Featured, then Forgotten: U.S. Network TV News and the Vietnam Veterans Against the War © 2011 by Mark D. Harmon Digital version at www.newfoundpress.utk.edu/pubs/harmon Newfound Press is a digital imprint of the University of Tennessee Libraries. Its publications are available for non-commercial and educational uses, such as research, teaching and private study. The author has licensed the work under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/. For all other uses, contact: Newfound Press University of Tennessee Libraries 1015 Volunteer Boulevard Knoxville, TN 37996-1000 www.newfoundpress.utk.edu ISBN-13: 978-0-9797292-8-7 ISBN-10: 0-9797292-8-9 Harmon, Mark D., (Mark Desmond), 1957- Found, featured, then forgotten : U.S. network tv news and the Vietnam Veterans Against the War / Mark D. Harmon. Knoxville, Tenn. : Newfound Press, University of Tennessee Libraries, c2011. 191 p. : digital, PDF file. Includes bibliographical references (p. [159]-191). 1. Vietnam Veterans Against the War—Press coverage—United States. 2. Vietnam War, 1961-1975—Protest movements—United States—Press coverage. 3. Television broadcasting of news—United States—History—20th century. I. Title. HE8700.76.V54 H37 2011 Book design by Jayne White Rogers Cover design by Meagan Louise Maxwell Contents Preface .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The War Within a War: Dissent in the Vietnam-Era Military
    Vietnam Generation Volume 2 Number 1 GI Resistance: Soldiers and Veterans Article 3 Against the War 1-1990 The aW r Within a War: Dissent in the Vietnam-Era Military James R. Hayes Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/vietnamgeneration Part of the American Studies Commons Recommended Citation Hayes, James R. (1990) "The aW r Within a War: Dissent in the Vietnam-Era Military," Vietnam Generation: Vol. 2 : No. 1 , Article 3. Available at: http://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/vietnamgeneration/vol2/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by La Salle University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vietnam Generation by an authorized editor of La Salle University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ThE W ar W bhiN a W a r : DissENT in t Me Vie t n a m E ra MiliTARy Jaimes R. Ha y es The signing of the Indochina peace agreements in early 1973 officially ended American participation in the Vietnam conflict. Military officials would probably be the first to admit that they, more than any other group in society, experienced the first sigh of relief. Throughout most of the war, the military was subjected to invectives emanating from a war-weary civilian sector, as well as disgruntled, ant iwar, anti-military GIs. While civil-military relations have a well-documented tradition of animosity, organized protest within the ranks is without parallel in American military history.1 For military traditionalists, the presence of a small but vocal minority of soldiers raising the old ideal of a “democratic military” produced some acute anxiety.
    [Show full text]
  • Jan. 5, 2017, Vol. 59, No. 1
    AMÉRICA LATINA 12 Workers and oppressed peoples of the world unite! workers.org Vol. 59, No. 1 Jan. 5, 2017 $1 Charleston, S.C., see page 4. Mass protests planned FIGHT TRUMP! By Stephen Millies Jan. 1 — People are organizing all over the United States to go to Washington, D.C., on Friday, Jan. 20, and spoil Donald Trump’s “inhoguration.” The racist, sexist predator threatening to ramp up the nuclear arms race will be met with mass protests at #J20Resist. J20 organizers are calling for people to gather at what they are renaming “Anti-Columbus Plaza” in front of D.C.’s Union Station at 6 a.m. on Jan. 20. A march on the White House will begin at 10 a.m. The cops and agencies of the state are trying to stop peo- ple from saying “No to Trump!” Racist cops love Trump, who called Mexican immigrants “rapists” and who wants to crush the Black Lives Matter movement. Ludicrous limits are being set to attempt to stop demon- strators. Among the items the cops are trying to prohibit at checkpoints are backpacks, balloons and even signs larger than 8 by 6 by 4 inches — about the size of half a sheet of typing paper! “Many restrictions are vague, all-encompassing, contra- dictory and open to police interpretation,” said New York J20 organizer Taryn Fivek. “All are intended to restrict people’s freedom of assembly, freedom of speech and free- dom of expression.” Organizers not deterred by restrictions But none of these police state measures are stopping or- ganizers from filling buses.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting the GI and Vietnam Veterans
    Gudaitis, Alexandra 2019 History Thesis Title: “An Act of Honor”: Revisiting the GI and Vietnam Veterans Against the War Movements: Advisor: Jessica Chapman Advisor is Co-author: None of the above Second Advisor: Released: release now Authenticated User Access: N/A Contains Copyrighted Material: No “An Act of Honor”: Revisiting the GI and Vietnam Veterans Against the War Movements by Alexandra A. Gudaitis Jessica Chapman, Advisor A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts with Honors in History WILLIAMS COLLEGE Williamstown, Massachusetts April 15, 2019 Dedicated to the brave participants in the GI and Vietnam Veterans Against the War Movements, especially those who shared their stories with me. Table of Contents Acknowledgments.....................................................................................................................i Introduction: “We Have to Tell People the Truth”.........................................................................................1 Chapter One: “Acts of Conscience”: The GI Movement of the Vietnam War..............................................17 Chapter Two: “The Highest Form of Patriotism”: Vietnam Veterans Against the War................................55 Conclusion: “I Have No Regrets”................................................................................................................99 Images.....................................................................................................................................107
    [Show full text]
  • GI Antiwar Newspapers and the Culture of Protest Barbara L
    Vietnam Generation Volume 2 Number 1 GI Resistance: Soldiers and Veterans Article 4 Against the War 1-1990 Breaking Ranks: GI Antiwar Newspapers and the Culture of Protest Barbara L. Tischler Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/vietnamgeneration Part of the American Studies Commons Recommended Citation Tischler, Barbara L. (1990) "Breaking Ranks: GI Antiwar Newspapers and the Culture of Protest," Vietnam Generation: Vol. 2 : No. 1 , Article 4. Available at: http://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/vietnamgeneration/vol2/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by La Salle University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vietnam Generation by an authorized editor of La Salle University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BREAkiNq RANks: Gl A ntIw a r N e w s p a p e r s ANd t He C u I tu re of P r o t e st BARbARA L. TischlER GIs: Caution, Reading this paper may be hazardous to your Discipline, Morale, and Loyalty. — The Pawn (Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD)1 This publication is your property and cannot legally be taken from you. —Aboveground (Fort Carson, Colorado Springs, CO)2 Popular works about the United States in the 1960s often analyze the Vietnam war in terms of the actions of Lyndon Johnson, Melvin Laird, and William Westmoreland juxtaposed to the protests of Abbie Hoffman, Mark Rudd, and Bemadine Dohm. But such a “top down” approach is unsatisfactory in analyzing the decentralized and loosely structured opposition to United States military involvement in Southeast Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Olive-Drab Rebels U.S
    “The morale, discipline, and battleworthiness of the U.S. Armed Forces are, with a few salient exceptions, lower Olive-Drab and worse than at any time in this century and possibly in the history of the United States. By every conceivable indicator, our army that remains in Vietnam is in a state approaching collapse, with individual units avoiding or Rebels having refused combat, murdering their officers and non-commissioned officers, drug-ridden and dispirited Military Organising During the Vietnam Era where not near mutinous. Elsewhere than Vietnam the By Matthew Rinaldi situation is nearly as serious.” - Colonel Robert D. Heinl, June 1971 republished & distributed by firestarter Including: firestarter press Harass the Brass po box 50217 baltimore, md 21211 Some Notes Toward the Subversion of the US Armed Forces usa By Kevin Keating 52 and may yet find themselves recruited to become the replacement troops for the war-weary still in Iraq. As these words are being written, the Third Infantry Division has taken the 148th admitted combat fatality of the current war as a young soldier was blown from his humvee by a land mine. The Olive-Drab Rebels U.S. press has noted his death as the fatality which marks the 2003 war as more fatal to U.S. soldiers than the 1991 war against Iraq. Matthew Rinaldi His fellow soldiers may see a deeper meaning. & Matthew Rinaldi, July 2003 Harass the Brass Kevin Keating published by firestarter press, 2004 originally published by Antagonism Press, 2002 & 2003 For more free copies of this pamphlet, other publications, and a catalog, write: firestarter press po box 50217 baltimore, md 21211 usa Please feel free to photocopy, republish, and steal any of the following text.
    [Show full text]
  • Gi Dissent During the Vietnam War by Derek W. Seidman Ba
    THE UNQUIET AMERICANS: GI DISSENT DURING THE VIETNAM WAR BY DEREK W. SEIDMAN B.A., UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES, 2002 A.M., BROWN UNIVERSITY, 2005 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AT BROWN UNIVERSITY PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND MAY 2010 © Copyright 2010 by Derek W. Seidman This dissertation by Derek W. Seidman is accepted in its present form by the Department of History as satisfying the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date ____________ ______________________________ Robert O. Self, Director Recommended to the Graduate Council Date ____________ ______________________________ Elliott J. Gorn, Reader Date ____________ ______________________________ Naoko Shibusawa, Reader Approved by the Graduate Council Date ____________ _______________________________ Sheila Bonde, Dean of the Graduate School iii CURRICULUM VITAE Derek W. Seidman was born in St. Louis, Missouri on May 3, 1980 and grew up in Rochester, New York and San Francisco, California. He attended the University of California, Los Angeles, where he received a B.A. in History with a Minor in Political Science in 2002. He received an A.M. in History from Brown University in 2005. While at Brown, he specialized in the social, cultural and political history of the 20th Century United States, with an emphasis on social movements. His dissertation research was funded by Brown University, the Center for the United States and the Cold War at New York University, the Center for the History of Print Culture in Modern America at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, the Wisconsin Historical Society, and the Friends of the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
    [Show full text]
  • Soldiers Against the War
    SOLDIERS AGAINST THE WAR The story of Pvt. Andrew Stapp 10< and the Fort Sill Gl's I was very interested to learn about the case of Private Andrew Stapp, who has shown great courage in his opposition to the Vietnam war. I earnestly hope that other American soldiers will follow his example. LORD BERTRAND RUSSELL We fully and wholeheartedly support your stand against the war in Vietnam. Your courage in the face of the army is inspiring. We will help with publicity and fund raising. We are joined in common struggle against U.S. imperialism. We are with you. NICK SALVATORE, END THE DRAFT COMMITTEE The Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee wishes to voice its support for Pvt. Stapp and others and the stand that they have taken on the Vietnam war. It should be noted that the position taken by them was ar­ rived at through the intellectual process of familiarizing themselves with the issues surrounding the war through reading and discussion, and not out of blind emotion. For this they have been prosecuted. How does this country dare proclaim that it is fighting for freedom, justice and democ­ racy for the Vietnamese people. This country knows nothing of freedom, justice and democracy when it punishes people for thinking. H. RAP BROWN, Chairman, SNCC Dear Pvt. Stapp: ... it is encouraging to know that someone like you thinks enough of my stand and position in compliance with my convic­ tion in religion to write me such a warm and thoughtful note. May justice and freedom be your reward. Enclosed is a copy of my favorite boxing picture which I hope you will accept as a token of my regard.
    [Show full text]
  • An Army of the Willing: Fayette'nam, Soldier Dissent, And
    An Army of the Willing: Fayette’Nam, Soldier Dissent, and the Untold Story of the All‐ Volunteer Force by Scovill Wannamaker Currin Jr. Department of History Duke University Date: _______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Nancy MacLean, Supervisor ___________________________ Adriane Lentz‐Smith ___________________________ Dirk Bonker ___________________________ Sarah Deutsch Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of Duke University 2015 ABSTRACT An Army of the Willing: Fayette’Nam, Soldier Dissent, and the Untold Story of the All‐ Volunteer Force by Scovill Wannamaker Currin Jr. Department of History Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Nancy MacLean, Supervisor ___________________________ Adriane Lentz‐Smith ___________________________ Dirk Bonker ___________________________ Sarah Deutsch An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of Duke University 2015 Copyright by Scovill Wannamaker Currin Jr. 2015 Abstract Using Fort Bragg and Fayetteville, North Carolina, as a local case study, this dissertation examines the GI dissent movement during the Vietnam War and its profound impact on the ending of the draft and the establishment of the All‐Volunteer Force in 1973. I demonstrate that the US military consciously and methodically shifted from a conscripted force to the All‐Volunteer Force as a safeguard to ensure that dissent in the ranks never arose again as it had during the Vietnam War. This story speaks to profound questions regarding state power that are essential to making sense of our recent history.
    [Show full text]
  • American Servicemen's Union Andrew Stapp, Chairman 156 Fifth Ave., Rm.538 New York, N
    American Servicemen's Union Andrew stapp, chairman 156 Fifth Ave., Rm.538 New York, N. Y. 10010 212-675-6780 January 29, 1970 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ' ;rr> ICAN SERVICEMANS UNION ORGANIZER ACTS AS HIS OWN LAWYER AGAINST AWOL CHARGES. Private Mitch Smith, American Servicemans Union field oraanizer stationed at Fort Jackson, South Carolina is going on trial Friday, Jan. 30 for being AWOL. Pvt. Smith, who rill be acting as his own attorney denies being AWOL. He stated that he left Ft. Jackson in early November to participate in the November Moratorium in full accordance with the ool icy of the American Servicemans Union to organize Gl 's in Washington against the Vietnam " r. At a meeting of the National Conference of GI Rights! Pvt. Smith told the anti-war Gl 's of their rights to refuse to obey unjust and illenal orders. Further .Smith stated that the Vietnam War is an imperialist war and "Guys are not worried about the Constitution when they realize they may be dead for a cause in which they don't believe." (New York Times, November 14-, 1969) Pvt. Smith in defendinn himself before a military tribunal vil 1 nuestion the authority of the brass to rule on his participation in American Servicemans Union affairs and his anti-war activities in Hashington. Smith v/ill also raise on behalf of the ASU at his trial the illegality of the Vietnam War and the U*S. nenocidal policy against the Vietnamese people as exemplified by the My Lai atrocities. Finally Smith will out the military on trial for the racism of the brass and their system of oppressing the rights of Black and Puerto Rican GI's.
    [Show full text]