Dragonfly: Thermal Design Overview

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dragonfly: Thermal Design Overview ICES-2020-160 Dragonfly: Thermal Design Overview G. Allan Holtzman1, Robert F. Coker2, Carl J. Ercol3 and Douglas S. Adams4 Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, MD 20723 and Loren C. Zumwalt5 Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company, 12257 S Wadsworth Blvd, Littleton, Colorado 80125 Dragonfly is a NASA New Frontiers mission that will send a rotorcraft lander to Titan, Saturn’s largest moon. Titan has a dense atmosphere and low gravity, making flight an ideal way to traverse its surface. Powered flight will be achieved by employing a battery charged by a Multi-Mission Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (MMRTG). The temperature of Titan at its surface is nearly constant but extremely cold at 94 K, so the lander’s thermal control system (TCS) will retain the excess heat from the MMRTG and distribute it throughout the lander body with a pumped fluid loop. During cruise to Titan, a cruise stage with a second pumped fluid loop will maintain spacecraft components and the MMRTG within allowable flight temperatures. The performance of the lander TCS as well as all components exposed to the Titan environment will be verified with testing on Earth in a Titan-relevant environment. This paper will provide an overview of the lander and cruise stage still-evolving thermal design details with a discussion of the planned thermal testing campaign. Nomenclature APL = Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory AU = Astronomical Unit CCHP = Constant Conductance Heat Pipe CFC-11 = ChloroFluoroCarbon fluid, also known as freon-11 EDL = Entry Descent and Landing EOM = End Of Mission HGA = High Gain Antenna I&T = Integration and Test IMU = Intertial Measurement Unit LIDAR = Laser Imaging, Detection, And Ranging LM = Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company MMRTG = Multi-Mission Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator MSL = Mars Science Laboratory N2H4 = Hydrazine PSU = Power Switching Unit or Penn State University RCS = Reaction Control System RF = Radio Frequency TCM = Trajectory Correction Maneuver TCS = Thermal Control System TEL = Thermal Exterior Losses document TVAC = Thermal VACuum TWTA = Traveling Wave Tube Amplifier 1 Dragonfly Lead Thermal Engineer, Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, MD 20723. 2 Dragonfly Instrument and Analysis Thermal Lead, Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, MD 20723. 3 Dragonfly Lander Fluid Loop Thermal Lead, Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, MD 20723. 4 Dragonfly Spacecraft System Engineer, The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, MD 20723. 5 Dragonfly Cruise Thermal Lead, Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company, 12257 S Wadsworth Blvd, Littleton, Colorado 80125. Copyright © 2020 Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory and Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company I. Introduction On Titan, the molecules that have been raining down like manna from heaven for the last 4 billion years might still be there largely unaltered, deep-frozen, awaiting the chemists from Earth. — Carl Sagan, Pale Blue Dot Dragonfly will allow our Earth chemists to explore this organically rich, ocean world at multiple locations on Titan’s surface by flying through its thick atmosphere (surface pressure = 1.5 bar), aided by the relatively low Titan gravity (g = 1.35 m/s²). The Titan environment is extremely cold at 94 K (-179°C), and although the lander’s thermal control system must take these harsh conditions into account, they are known and constant, changing very little over diurnal or even seasonal cycles. A single MMRTG supplies not only the heat needed to survive the Titan and cruise environments, but also all the electrical power for the lander and spacecraft throughout the mission including spacecraft trajectory correction maneuvers and atmospheric flight on Titan, stored for use during these transient events using a large lithium-ion battery. Figure 1. Dragonfly rotorcraft lander, surface configuration with HGA deployed. In order for Dragonfly to soar majestically through the Titan atmosphere, it must first get to Titan. During cruise, and on the launch pad once the MMRTG is installed, a pumped fluid loop that runs parallel to the lander’s internal loop (intended only for surface operations) manages heat dissipation from the MMRTG, which is near 2000 W at the beginning of the mission. The pump assembly, which is similar to the lander pumps, runs at a constant power, while passive mixing valves on the cruise stage radiator segments adjust for thermal variations. The cruise stage fluid loop attaches to a heat exchanger port on the MMRTG to maintain the fin root temperature near its optimum power generation value. This heat dissipation will thermally control all cruise and entry vehicle components, such as the tanks, valves, and electronics, as well as the aeroshell that surrounds the lander. Electrical heater power is not required in normal operations and is minimized for transient events by this design approach. The radiator will have two zones to allow the system to adjust to changing environmental conditions as the spacecraft travels through the inner solar system and then outward to Titan and still maintain constant MMRTG and propellant tank temperatures. 2 International Conference on Environmental Systems Figure 2. Cruise stage thermal block diagram. Similar to the cruise stage thermal control system, the lander’s thermal control system harvests heat from the MMRTG and distributes it throughout the body of the lander using a pumped fluid loop, but is completely separate from the cruise stage fluid loop, which will have been jettisoned with the rest of the cruise stage on arrival to Titan. The fixed amount of heat provided by the MMRTG used protect the lander’s internal components from the cold Titan thermal environment will be preserved by carefully designing the level of thermal isolation between the lander interior and its environment. External components on the lander will be designed to have survival temperatures < 94 K, such that they will not require survival heaters during hibernation. The performance of the lander TCS as well as all components directly exposed to the Titan environment will be verified with testing on Earth in a Titan-relevant environment. Figure 3. Lander thermal block diagram. II. Lander Thermal Control System The heart of the thermal control system for the lander is the MMRTG. Heat generated by the MMRTG is distributed throughout the lander body using a pumped fluid loop to maintain a typical thermal environment for its internal components. An insulating layer of Rohacell™ foam protects the interior of the lander from the cryogenic 3 International Conference on Environmental Systems and convective Titan environment by fully enclosing the MMRTG, battery, electronics and most science instruments. Structural attachments, such as the mobility motor arms, landing legs, wires, camera and LIDAR windows, and other penetrations to the insulating foam layer, are designed to minimize the heat leak from the lander interior to the external environment. Some components, such as the mobility and sampling system motors, are outside the lander interior and are designed and tested to survive in the Titan environment, with preheaters (in some cases) to reach their minimum operational temperatures. The thermal insulation for the lander is a 5-cm-thick layer of Rohacell™ 31 HF foam, which is a closed-cell rigid foam based on polymethacrylimide chemistry with an approximate density of 31 kg/m3 and extremely low dielectric constants with particularly favorable RF transmission properties at high frequencies. The effective thermal conductivity through a 5-cm-thick layer of foam from 0°C (approximate lander interior) to −179°C (approximate Titan ambient) is ≤0.035 W/m/K, verified by testing at the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) in a flight-relevant environment. The thermal conductivity of the foam is less than the datasheet value for this application due to the decrease in material thermal conductivity with decreasing temperature. The external surface temperature of the lander, including the outside of the MMRTG enclosure, is greatly attenuated by the foam insulation, resulting in lander skin temperatures only 10–15°C above ambient (worst-case hot condition assuming no wind). A thin skin of aluminized Kapton will be bonded to the outer surface of the foam for grounding during Titan surface operations and handling during lander integration and testing (I&T). The lander pumped fluid loop distributes the MMRTG heat, which is predicted to be 1670 W EOM, to components within the lander body. The loop consists of a 1-cm inner diameter metal tube that runs along the length of the lander, up to the lander top deck, and back, attaching to most boxes and the battery with flanges on the tube, typically at the base of each box to simplify I&T (particularly for the battery). The heritage working fluid for previous MMRTG missions is CFC-11 at 2 L/min, and a design trade is currently in progress for Dragonfly to determine the optimum fluid and fluid loop architecture, for flight and for testing, for the lander and cruise stage, that takes into account thermal performance, temperature limits, pump power, fluid availability, safety, government regulations, reliability, radiation susceptibility, etc. The lander fluid loop will use one of the heat exchanger ports of the MMRTG, as done on Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) [Paris et al., 2004; Bhandari et al., 2013]. This approach will maintain the MMRTG fin root temperature near its optimum level. Thermal trim devices, located one on each side of the lander near its aft end, will provide a Vernier-style adjustment of the lander internal temperature, allowing for precise control of the MMRTG fin root temperature on Titan. The thermal trim devices conceptually consist of an aluminum sheet metal, covered with a 5-cm-thick layer of Rohacell™ foam, which opens using a linear actuator to expose the outside of the lander interior wall directly to the Titan environment.
Recommended publications
  • NASA's Dragonfly Program: Commercialized Robotics
    35th Space Symposium, Technical Track, Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States of America Presented on April 8th, 2019 NASA’s Dragonfly Program: Commercialized Robotics - Enabling a New Generation of Evolvable, Resilient Assets in Orbit John Lymer Maxar† Abstract Commercialized, affordable robotics for in-space assembly of large platforms and structures are being prepared for flight in 2021. Integrating easily with standard GEO and LEO satellite command and control architectures, these automation systems enable a new operating paradigm for on-orbit assets – one that includes incremental growth, on-demand payload refresh to match user needs, and in-situ warehousing for rapid expansion, augmentation, or dispersion on a timeline independent of launch. Introduction The Dragonfly Robotic System, developed first as a DARPA seedling and then maturing through the NASA Tipping Point Program, successfully completed a ground demonstration in late 2017, shown in Figure 1 assembling a Ka band antenna. Critical Design Review occurred in 2018. Ultra-lightweight and affordable, the Dragonfly Robotic System is designed to fit into existing satellite command and data handling (C&DH) subsystems and low rate command/telemetry links for inexpensive integration – it behaves like any other satellite subsystem. The supervised autonomy operating concept facilitates command and control from a standard Mission Operations Center. Current satellite operations personnel can plan and execute robotic operations with only minor additional training. Dragonfly represents the first ‘commercialized’ robotic system – affordable and accessible to satellite owners without the risk of infrastructure changes. † The operations of DigitalGlobe, SSL and Radiant Solutions were unified under the Maxar brand in February. MDA continues to operate as an independent business unit within the Maxar organization.
    [Show full text]
  • OPAG Update to the Planetary Science Advisory Committee (PAC)
    OPAG Update to the Planetary Science Advisory Committee (PAC) ? Linda Spilker OPAG Vice-Chair, JPL PAC Meeting September 24, 2019 Large KBOs: Outer Planets Assessment Group (OPAG) Charter https://www.lpi.usra.edu/opag/ • NASA's community-based forum to provide science input for planning and prioritizing outer planet exploration activities for the next several decades • Evaluates outer solar system exploration goals, objectives, investigations and required measurements on the basis of the widest possible community outreach • Meets twice per year, summer and winter – Next meeting: Feb. 3-4, 2020, LPI, Houston, TX • OPAG documents are inputs to the Decadal Surveys • OPAG and Small Bodies Assessment Group (SBAG) have Joint custody of Pluto system and other planets among Kuiper Belt Objects KBO planets OPAG Steering Committee Jeff Moore Linda Spilker OPAG Chair OPAG Vice-Chair * =New Member Ames Research Center Jet Propulsion Lab Alfred McEwen Lynnae Quick* Kathleen Mandt* University of Arizona NASA Goddard Applied Physics Laboratory OPAG Steering Committee Scott Edgington Amanda Hendrix Mark Hofstadter Jet Propulsion Lab Planetary Science Institute Jet Propulsion Lab Terry Hurford Carol Paty Goddard Space Flight Center Georgia Institute of Technology OPAG Steering Committee Morgan Cable* Britney Schmidt Kunio Sayanagi Jet Propulsion Lab Georgia Institute of Technology Hampton University * =New Member Tom Spilker* Abigail Rymer* Consultant Applied Physics Lab Recent and Upcoming OPAG-related Meetings • OPAG Subsurface Needs for Ocean Worlds
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Dragonfly Entry Aerosciences Measurements (Dream) J
    Overview of Dragonfly Entry Aerosciences Measurements (DrEAM) J. Santos1, A. Brandis2, H. Hwang1, A. Gülhan3, T. Thiele3, F. Siebe3, 1NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA; 2AMA, Inc. at NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA; 3German Aerospace Center (DLR e.V.), Supersonic and Hypersonic Technologies Department, Linder Höhe, 51147 Köln, Germany. Abstract: NASA Ames Research Center (ARC) (COSSTA). Since the methane concentration in the Ti- leads the Dragonfly Entry Aerosciences Measurements tan atmosphere is directly proportional to the radiative (DrEAM) project, which is an aeroshell instrumentation heat flux, the COSSTA measurements will be used to suite on the Dragonfly mission that fulfills the Engineer- reduce the current uncertainty in the methane volume ing Science Investigation requirement for the New fraction. Atmospheric density measurements and cap- Frontiers mission. NASA ARC is partnering with sule aerodynamic data will be obtained through the NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) and the Ger- onboard Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU), supple- man Aerospace Center (DLR) to provide a comprehen- mented by pressure transducers similar to those used by sive sensor suite, including a DLR-provided Data Ac- the MEDLI and MEDLI2 projects. The DrEAM pres- quisition System (DAS). DrEAM will provide key aer- sure sensors will be known as the Dragonfly Atmos- othermodynamic data and performance analysis for pheric Flight Transducers. (DrAFT). The pressure Dragonfly’s forebody and backshell Thermal Protection measurements, when combined with data from the on- System (TPS). board IMU, will allow for reconstruction of such quan- Titan’s atmosphere predominantly consists of nitro- tities as vehicle Mach number, freestream density, and gen (~98% by mole) with small amounts of methane atmospheric winds.
    [Show full text]
  • Banks in Lebanon
    932-933.qxd 14/01/2011 09:13 Õ Page 2 AL BAYAN BUSINESS GUIDE USEFUL NUMBERS Airport International Calls (100) Ports - Information (1) 628000-629065/6 Beirut (1) 580211/2/3/4/5/6 - 581400 - ADMINISTRATION (1) 629125/130 Internal Security Forces (112) Byblos (9) 540054 - Customs (1) 629160 Chika (6) 820101 National Defense (1701) (1702) Jounieh (9) 640038 Civil Defence (125) Saida (7) 752221 Tripoli (6) 600789 Complaints & Review (119) Ogero (1515) Tyr (7) 741596 Consumer Services Protection (1739) Police (160) Water Beirut (1) 386761/2 Red Cross (140) Dbaye (4) 542988- 543471 Electricity (145) (1707) Barouk (5) 554283 Telephone Repairs (113) Jounieh (9) 915055/6 Fire Department (175) Metn (1) 899416 Saida (7) 721271 General Security (1717) VAT (1710) Tripoli (6) 601276 Tyr (7) 740194 Information (120) Weather (1718) Zahle (8) 800235/722 ASSOCIATIONS, SYNDICATES & OTHER ORGANIZATIONS - MARBLE AND CEMENT (1)331220 KESRWAN (9)926135 BEIRUT - PAPER & PACKAGING (1)443106 NORTH METN (4)926072-920414 - PHARMACIES (1)425651-426041 - ACCOUNTANTS (1)616013/131- (3)366161 SOUTH METN (5)436766 - PLASTIC PRODUCERS (1)434126 - ACTORS (1)383407 - LAWYERS - PORT EMPLOYEES (1) 581284 - ADVERTISING (1)894545 - PRESS (1)865519-800351 ALEY (5)554278 - AUDITOR (1)322075 BAABDA (5)920616-924183 - ARTIST (1)383401 - R.D.C.L. (BUSINESSMEN) (1)320450 DAIR AL KAMAR (5)510244 - BANKS (1)970500 - READY WEAR (3)879707-(3)236999 - CARS DRIVERS (1)300448 - RESTAURANTS & CAFE (1)363040 JBEIL (9)541640 - CHEMICAL (1)499851/46 - TELEVISIONS (5)429740 JDEIDET EL METN (1)892548 - CONTRACTORS (5)454769 - TEXTILLES (5)450077-456151 JOUNIEH (9)915051-930750 - TOURISM JOURNALISTS (1)349251 - DENTISTS (1)611222/555 - SOCKS (9)906135 - TRADERS (1)347997-345735 - DOCTORS (1)610710 - TANNERS (9)911600 - ENGINEERS (1)850111 - TRADERS & IND.
    [Show full text]
  • JAXA's Planetary Exploration Plan
    Planetary Exploration and International Collaboration Institute of Space and Astronautical Science Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency Yoshio Toukaku, Director for International Strategy and Coordination Naoya Ozaki, Assistant Professor, Dept of Spacecraft Engineering ISAS/JAXA September, 2019 The Path Japanese Planetary Exploration 1985 1995 2010 2018 Sakigake/ Nozomi Akatsuki BepiColombo Suisei MMO/MPO Comet flyby Planned and Venus Climate Mercury Orbiter launched Mars Orbiter orbiter Asteroid Sample Asteroid Sample Martian Moons Lunar probe Return Mission Return Mission explorer Hiten Hayabusa Hayabusa2 MMX 1992 2003 2014 2020s (TBD) Recent Science Missions HAYABUSA 2003-2010 HINODE(SOLAR-B)2006- KAGUYASELENE)2007-2009 Asteroid Explorer SolAr OBservAtion Lunar Exploration AKATSUKI 2010- Venus Meteorology IKAROS 2010 HisAki 2013 SolAr SAil PlAnetary atmosphere HAYABUSA2 2014-2020 Hitomi(ASTRO-H) 2016 ArAse (ERG) 2016 Asteroid Explorer X-Ray Astronomy Van Allen Belt proBe Hayabusa & Hayabusa 2 Asteroid Sample Return Missions “Hayabusa” spacecraft brought back the material of Asteroid Itokawa while establishing innovative ion engines. “Hayabusa2”, while utilizing the experience cultivated in “Hayabusa”, has arrived at the C type Asteroid Ryugu in order to elucidate the origin and evolution of the solar system and primordial materials that would have led to emergence of life. Hayabusa Hayabusa2 Target Itokawa Ryugu Launch 2003 2014 Arrival 2005 2018 Return 2010 2020 ©JAXA Asteroid Ryugu 6 Martian Moons eXploration (MMX) Sample return from Marian moon for detailed analysis. Strategic L-Class A key element in the ISAS roadmap for small body exploration. Phase A n Science Objectives 1. Origin of Mars satellites. - Captured asteroids? - Accreted debris resulting from a giant impact? 2. Preparatory processes enabling to the habitability of the solar system.
    [Show full text]
  • Panama, by Nick Donnelly
    ISSN 1061-8503 TheA News Journalrgia of the Dragonfly Society of the Americas Volume 23 14 October 2011 Number 3 Published by the Dragonfly Society of the Americas http://www.DragonflySocietyAmericas.org/ ARGIA Vol. 23, No. 3, 14 October 2011 In This Issue .................................................................................................................................................................1 DSA is on Facebook ....................................................................................................................................................1 Calendar of Events ......................................................................................................................................................1 2011 Annual Meeting of DSA held in Fort Collins, Colorado, by Dave Leatherman ...............................................2 Northeast Regional DSA Meeting, by Joshua Rose ...................................................................................................8 2011 Annual Oregon Aeshna Blitz Sets New Records, by Steve Gordon .................................................................10 2012 Annual DSA Meeting: Baldcypress Swamps, Sandy Ponds, Blackwater Rivers, and Clubtails, by Chris Hill ....................................................................................................................................................................12 Northeast Meetings Update, by Bryan Pfeiffer .........................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • BPSC 2020 - Monday 13 January - AM
    BPSC 2020 - Monday 13 January - AM 08:30 Registration 09:00 WELCOME - Colin Wilson Outer planet atmospheres Jupiter's tropical circulation revealed via Juno radiometry and ground-based 09:10 Leigh Fletcher Leicester University infrared spectroscopy Modelling Jupiter's Dynamic Weather Layer: Turbulence, Clouds & Moist 09:23 Peter Read Oxford University Convection Exploring Clouds and Composition of Ice Giants with Ground- and Space-Based 09:36 Patrick Irwin Oxford University Telescopes Using Visible/Near-IR Longitudinal Variations in the Stratosphere of Uranus from the Spitzer Infrared 09:49 Naomi Rowe-Gurney Leicester University Spectrometer Uranus and Neptune in the Mid-Infrared: Atmospheric Temperatures and 10:02 Michale Roman Leicester University Circulation Inferred from Thermal Imaging 10:15 Karen Aplin Bristol University Atmospheric Ionisation and Lightning at the Ice Giant Planets Temporal and Spectral Studies of Jupiter's X-Ray Aurorae with XMM-Newton 10:28 Affelia Wibisono UCL/MSSL During a Compression Event 10:41 Richard Haythornthwaite UCL/MSSL Fast and slow water ion populations in the Enceladus plume 10:55 COFFEE Atmospheres posters: authors in attendance Terrestrial Planet atmospheres Detecting Pre-Biosignatures in the Atmospheres of Earth-Like Planets around 11:25 Sarah Rugheimer Oxford University Other Stars Energetic and Thermodynamic Limits on Continental Silicate Weathering 11:38 Robert Graham Oxford University Strongly Impact the Habitability of Wet, Rocky Worlds Multiple Superrotating States in an Idealized Model
    [Show full text]
  • Drams) for Titan
    DEVELOPMENT OF THE DRAGONFLY MASS SPECTROMETER (DRAMS) FOR TITAN. M. G. Trainer1, W. B. Brinckerhoff1, A. Grubisic1, R. M. Danell1,2, D. Kaplan1,3, F. H. W. van Amerom1,4, X. Li1,5, C. Freissinet6, C. Szopa6, A. Buch7, J. C. Stern1, S. Teinturier1,8, C. A. Malespin1, P. W. Barfknecht1, P. R. Stysley1, D. B. Coyle1, M. W. Mullin1, B. L. James1, E. I. Lyness1,9, R. S. Wilkinson1,10, J. W. Kellogg1, K. Zacny9, D. C. Wegel1, E. P. Turtle10, and the Dragonfly Team. 1NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt MD ([email protected]), 2Danell Consulting, Winterville NC, 3Kapscience, Tewksbury MA, 1,4Mini-Mass Consulting, Hyattsville MD, 5University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore MD, 6LATMOS, Guyancourt, France, 7LPGM, Gif-sur-Yvette, France, 8Universities Space Research Association, Columbia MD, 9Microtel, Greenbelt MD, 10ATA Aerospace, Greenbelt MD, 11Honeybee Robotics, Altadena CA, 12Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Columbia MD. Introduction: Titan's abundant compleX carbon- Table 1. DraMS Specifications rich chemistry, interior ocean, and past presence of Characteristic Predicted Performance liquid water on the surface make it an ideal destination to study prebiotic chemical processes and habitability of Mass Sensor Linear Ion Trap an extraterrestrial environment [e.g., 1-4]. NASA's Mass Range 15 – 1950 Da a Dragonfly New Frontiers mission is a rotorcraft lander Mass Resolution 0.4 – 3 Da (FWHM) b [5] designed to perform wide-ranging in situ exploration Mass Accuracy ± 0.4 Da on this moon of Saturn by flying to different geologic Ion polarity Positive and Negative ion detection c settings up to ~180 km apart.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA PSD Update
    Lori S. Glaze, Ph.D. NASA Planetary Science Division Director 2023–2032 Planetary Science and Astrobiology Decadal Survey Venus Panel October 20, 2020 1 Lunar Discovery and Exploration 3 Artemis and PSD • Initial Commercial Lunar Payload Service (CLPS) flights will study the lunar surface and resources at the lunar poles, starting from 2021 • VIPER: Golf-cart-sized rover will investigate volatiles in lunar polar soil • Astrobotic CLPS delivery by end of 2023 • Artemis III (2024): Crew will travel to the Moon and use Human Landing System to touch down on the lunar surface • Science Definition Team (chaired by Renee Weber, MSFC, and HLS Science Lead) will define detailed science objectives • Working with ESSIO on many lunar projects, e.g., ANGSA, instrument and technology development, international collaborations 4 Mars Program 5 Mars Sample Return • New Mars Sample Return (MSR) Program, Director: Jeff Gramling • Michael Meyer is serving as Lead/Chief Scientist for MEP and MSR • NASA/ESA MOU signed on October 5th • SMD-commissioned Independent Review for MSR will provide findings in late October • Working towards two launches in 2026 (NASA lander and ESA orbiter) – on track to enter Phase A this fall • NASA/ESA MSR Sample Planning Group - Phase 2 will address science and curation planning questions • Perseverance/MSR Caching Strategy Workshop is being planned for January 2020 Future Mars activities • Mars Architecture Strategy Working Group (MASWG) established by PSD in October 2019 to: • Determine science exploration of Mars beyond MSR
    [Show full text]
  • Selection and Characteristics of the Dragonfly Landing Site Near Selk
    The Planetary Science Journal, 2:24 (13pp), 2021 February https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/abd08f © 2021. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society. Selection and Characteristics of the Dragonfly Landing Site near Selk Crater, Titan Ralph D. Lorenz1 , Shannon M. MacKenzie1 , Catherine D. Neish2,3 , Alice Le Gall4 , Elizabeth P. Turtle1 , Jason W. Barnes5 , Melissa G. Trainer6 , Alyssa Werynski2, Joshua Hedgepeth2, and Erich Karkoschka7 1 Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory 1001 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, MD 20723, USA 2 Department of Earth Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada 3 The Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, AZ, USA 4 LATMOS/IPSL, UVSQ Université Paris-Saclay, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Paris, France 5 Department of Physics, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-0903, USA 6 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA 7 Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA Received 2020 September 21; revised 2020 November 30; accepted 2020 December 2; published 2021 February 8 Abstract The factors contributing to the initial selection of a dune site near the Selk impact structure on Titan as the first landing site for the Dragonfly mission are described. These include arrival geometry and aerodynamic/ aerothermodynamic considerations, illumination, and Earth visibility, as well as the likely presence of exposed deposits of water-rich material, potentially including materials where molten ice has interacted with organics. Cassini observations of Selk are summarized and interpreted: near-infrared reflectance and microwave emission data indicate water-rich materials in and around the crater. Radar topography data shows the rim of Selk to have slopes on multi-km scales reaching only ∼2° degrees, an order of magnitude shallower than early photoclinometric estimates.
    [Show full text]
  • Spacecraft Seismology at an Ocean Worlds Analog Site
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 13, EPSC-DPS2019-1086-2, 2019 EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC Attribution 4.0 license. Spacecraft Seismology at an Ocean Worlds Analog Site D. N. DellaGiustina (1), S. H. Bailey (1), V. J. Bray (1), P. Dahl (2), N. C. Schmerr (3), A. G. Marusiak (3), B. Avenson (4), E. C. Pettit (5), and C. A. Bennett (1). (1) Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, USA. (2) Applied Physics Laboratory University of Washington, Seattle WA, USA. (3) University of Maryland College Park, College Park, MD, USA. (4) Silicon Audio, Austin, TX, USA. (5) Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA. ([email protected]). Abstract glacial lake located nearly 830 m below the surface of the Greenland ice sheet [4]. One experimental Recently proposed landed missions to outer solar objective of this study included quantifying the system ocean worlds have included seismic sensor difference in scientific return between a seismometer payloads [1][2]. Seismometers are uniquely suited to coupled directly to the ice through burial, versus determine the depth to a subsurface ocean and any sensors mounted to the lander deck and feet. Here we intermediate bodies of water. Here we present results present early analysis that has been performed to from a seismology experiment at an ocean worlds achieve that objective. analog site in Northwest Greenland. In particular, we focus on the efficacy of lander-mounted seismic 2. Motivation payloads to recover teleseismic signals and subsequently constrain the depth to an ice-water In terrestrial seismology, the Apollo seismic interface. experiments [5], and the InSight Mars SEIS investigation [6], the sensor is coupled directly to the ground.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA's Planetary Science Portfolio (IG-20-023)
    NASA Office of Inspector General National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of Audits NASA’S PLANETARY SCIENCE PORTFOLIO September 16, 2020 Report No. IG-20-023 Office of Inspector General To report, fraud, waste, abuse, or mismanagement, contact the NASA OIG Hotline at 800-424-9183 or 800-535-8134 (TDD) or visit https://oig.nasa.gov/hotline.html. You can also write to NASA Inspector General, P.O. Box 23089, L’Enfant Plaza Station, Washington, D.C. 20026. The identity of each writer and caller can be kept confidential, upon request, to the extent permitted by law. To suggest ideas or request future audits, contact the Assistant Inspector General for Audits at https://oig.nasa.gov/aboutAll.html. RESULTS IN BRIEF NASA’s Planetary Science Portfolio NASA Office of Inspector General Office of Audits September 16, 2020 IG-20-023 (A-19-013-00) WHY WE PERFORMED THIS AUDIT NASA’s Planetary Science Division (PSD) is responsible for a portfolio of spacecraft, including orbiters, landers, rovers, and probes, that seek to advance our understanding of the solar system by exploring the Earth’s Moon, other planets and their moons, asteroids and comets, and the icy bodies beyond Pluto. Currently, the planetary science portfolio consists of 30 space flight missions in various stages of operation. PSD missions fall under three categories: Discovery (small-class missions with development costs capped at $500 million); New Frontiers (medium-class missions with estimated development costs under $1 billion); and Flagship (large-class missions costing several billion dollars). With a proposed budget averaging $2.8 billion annually for the next 5 years, PSD is forecasted to maintain the largest budget of the six divisions within NASA’s Science Mission Directorate while supporting a wide range of exploration and research activities recommended by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (National Academies) or mandated by Congress.
    [Show full text]