DOCSLIB.ORG

Dragonfly: New Frontiers Mission Concept Study in Situ Exploration Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dragonfly: New Frontiers Mission Concept Study in Situ Exploration Of Dragonfly: New Frontiers mission concept study in situ exploration of Titan's prebiotic organic chemistry and habitability E.P. Turtle, J.W. Barnes, M.G. Trainer, R.D. Lorenz, K.E. Hibbard, D.S. Adams, P. Bedini, J.W. Langelaan, K. Zacny, and the Dragonfly Team OPAG, 22 February 2018 TITANExploring Titan, an EarthlikeEXPLORER Organic-Rich World ... Titan System Science – The rich interactions at Titan among the surrounding space environment, the atmosphere, the surface, and the interior mirror processes on Earth. Titan is a dynamic world: clouds and rainfall change on hourly time- scales. On ~16-day timescales, tides rise and fall in lakes of liquid hydrocarbons, drive winds in the atmosphere, and raise stresses deep in the interior. Year-to-year, seasonal changes are observed in atmospheric composition, aerosols, tempera- tures, and wind patterns. On geological timescales, atmospheric evolution occurs via escape, photochemical reactions, and cryovolcanism. Many analogs to Earth have been found. Titan’s surface has been eroded by rivers, the precipitation may be torrential enough to cause fl ash fl oods, and the atmosphere exhibits a greenhouse effect and stratospheric anomalies analogous to Earth’s ozone hole. Titan and the Origins of Life – The inventory of complex organic material on Titan is remarkably rich. Synthesis of or- ganics begins in the active ionosphere; it results in the thick haze lower in Titan’s atmosphere, the surface accumulations of organic liquids and particles that form lakes in polar regions, and the vast expanses of dunes near the equator. Further processing by exposure for thousands of years to liquid water at sites of impacts and cryovolcanism should yield building blocks of life, such as pyrimidines and amino acids. Given such timescales and conditions, Titan holds possibilities for fundamentally new organic chemistry that cannot be reproduced in the laboratory on Earth. Synergistic Science – Owing to its unique atmosphere, Titan engages a more extensive range of scientifi c disciplines than other icy satellites. It is an outstandingNext target for step comparative in planetology, seeking both with answers other satellites and to with the terres- trial planets. Titan’s environment also enables uniquely affordable deployment of a wide array of instrumentation at the surface, in the atmosphere, and in orbit. Thus, fundamentalthe powerful complement of scientifiquestions c tools necessary to understand such a complex system can actually be brought to bear. For example, in situ investigations such as seismic sensors and detailed chemical analyses supportWhat and makes inform an orbital a planet survey of this or diverse moon target. Combinationshabitable? of techniques provide more robustWhat constraints chemical on mysteries such processes as Titan’s interior structureled to and the atmospheric development circulation. of life? § Titan is an ideal destination to answer 1,000 Solar UV 0.0 these questions because it has the key Energetic N2 ingredients known to be necessary for life: 500 Diffusion Particles 0.01 4 CH 4 and Dust CH Energy: Sunlight, photochemistry Particles ar b m Organic material: Abundant carbon and , k e , r e 0.03 complex organics 60 Condensate Haze essu r ltitud P Solvents: Liquid water, as well as methane A 0.1 C H Ice Ø Potential for organics to interact with liquid water at 40 2 6 CH -N Clouds the surFace, e.g., cryovolcanism, impact craters 4 2 0.3 20 Ø Potential for exchange of surface organics with vast Rain Impacts Ethane-methane CH4 H O/NH Melt 1.0 interior ocean seas/lakes Venting 2 3 Organic Dunes 0 seas/lakes 1.5 NH /H O Cryovolcanism? Ø Earth-like world with an active methane cycle River Channels Organic Sediments 3 2 instead of Earth’s water cycle 07-01121-03 Titan’s atmosphere: 07-01121 • Liquid methane could support development of alternate biological systems Ø Surface pressure = 1.5 bar § Titan is an ocean world laboratory to Ø Surface temperature = 94 K investigate primitive chemistry and to Ø Troposphere ~94% N2, ~6% CH4, 0.1% H2 search for biosignatures Ø Complex photochemistry in upper atmosphere à H & N compounds Space Exploration OPAG Meeting, Hampton, VA, 22 February 2018 Next step in seeking answers to fundamental questions What makes a planet or moon habitable? What chemical processes led to the development of life? § Titan is an ideal destination to answer these questions because it has the key ingredients known to be necessary for life: Energy: Sunlight, photochemistry Organic material: Abundant carbon and complex organics Solvents: Liquid water, as well as methane Ø Potential for organics to interact with liquid water at the surFace, e.g., cryovolcanism, impact craters Ø Potential for exchange of surface organics with vast interior ocean Ø Earth-like world with an active methane cycle instead of Earth’s water cycle • Liquid methane could support development of alternate biological systems § Titan is an ocean world laboratory to investigate primitive chemistry and to search for biosignatures Space Exploration OPAG Meeting, Hampton, VA, 22 February 2018 TITANExploring Titan, an EarthlikeEXPLORER Organic-Rich World ... Titan System Science – The rich interactions at Titan among the surrounding space environment, the atmosphere, the surface, and the interior mirror processes on Earth. Titan is a dynamic world: clouds and rainfall change on hourly time- scales. On ~16-day timescales, tides rise and fall in lakes of liquid hydrocarbons, drive winds in the atmosphere, and raise stresses deep in the interior. Year-to-year, seasonal changes are observed in atmospheric composition, aerosols, tempera- tures, and wind patterns. On geological timescales, atmospheric evolution occurs via escape, photochemical reactions, and cryovolcanism. Many analogs to Earth have been found. Titan’s surface has been eroded by rivers, the precipitation may be torrential enough to cause fl ash fl oods, and the atmosphere exhibits a greenhouse effect and stratospheric anomalies analogous to Earth’s ozone hole. Titan and the Origins of Life – The inventory of complex organic material on Titan is remarkably rich. Synthesis of or- ganics begins in the active ionosphere; it results in the thick haze lower in Titan’s atmosphere, the surface accumulations of organic liquids and particles that form lakes in polar regions, and the vast expanses of dunes near the equator. Further processing by exposure for thousands of years to liquid water at sites of impacts and cryovolcanism should yield building blocks of life, such as pyrimidines and amino acids. Given such timescales and conditions, Titan holds possibilities for fundamentally new organic chemistry that cannot be reproduced in the laboratory on Earth. Synergistic Science – Owing to its unique atmosphere, Titan engages a more extensive range of scientifi c disciplines than Next step inother seeking icy satellites. It isanswers an outstanding target to for comparative planetology, both with other satellites and with the terres- trial planets. Titan’s environment also enables uniquely affordable deployment of a wide array of instrumentation at the fundamentalsurface, in the atmosphere,questions and in orbit. Thus, the powerful complement of scientifi c tools necessary to understand such a complex system can actually be brought to bear. For example, in situ investigations such as seismic sensors and detailed What makes a planet orchemical moon analyses habitable? support and inform an orbital survey of this diverse target. Combinations of techniques provide more What chemical processes led robustto the constraints development on mysteries such as of Titan’s life? interior structure and atmospheric circulation. § Titan is an ideal destination to answer 1,000 Solar UV 0.0 these questions because it has the key N Energetic ingredients known to be necessary for life: 2 500 Diffusion Particles 0.01 4 CH 4 and Dust CH Energy: Sunlight, photochemistry Particles ar b Organic material: Abundant carbon and m , k e , r complex organics e 0.03 60 Condensate Haze essu r Solvents: Liquid water, as well as methane ltitud P A 0.1 C H Ice Ø Potential for organics to interact with liquid water at 40 2 6 the surFace, e.g., cryovolcanism, impact craters CH -N Clouds 4 2 0.3 Ø Potential for exchange of surface organics with vast 20 Rain Impacts interior ocean Ethane-methane CH4 H O/NH Melt 1.0 seas/lakes Venting 2 3 Organic Dunes 0 seas/lakes 1.5 Ø Earth-like world with an active methane cycle NH /H O Cryovolcanism? instead of Earth’s water cycle River Channels Organic Sediments 3 2 07-01121-03 • Liquid methane could support development (Lorenz, Waite, Leary, Reh, et al., 2007, Titan 07-01121 of alternate biological systems Explorer Flagship Mission Study Report) § Titan is an ocean world laboratory to investigate primitive chemistry and to search for biosignatures Space Exploration OPAG Meeting, Hampton, VA, 22 February 2018 Lunar and Planetary Science XLVIII (2017) 1958.pdf Thus the Dragonfly mission concept is a quadcop- acterize the habitability of Titan's environment, inves- ter designed to take advantage of Titan's environment tigate how far prebiotic chemistry has progressed, and to be able to sample materials and determine the sur- search for chemical signatures indicative of water- face composition in different geologic settings (Fig. 1). based and/or hydrocarbon-based life. Science Objectives: The compositions of the solid References: [1] Raulin F. et al. (2010) Titan's As- materials on Titan's surface are still essentially un- trobiology, in Titan from Cassini-Huygens Brown et known. Measuring the composition of materials in al. Eds. [2] Thompson W. R. and Sagan C. (1992), C. different geologic settings will reveal how far prebiotic Organic chemistry on Titan: Surface interactions , chemistry has progressed in environments that provide Symposium on Titan, ESA SP-338, 167-176. [3] Neish known key ingredients for life. Areas of particular in- C. D. et al. (2010) Astrobiology 10, 337-347.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NASA's Dragonfly Program: Commercialized Robotics
    35th Space Symposium, Technical Track, Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States of America Presented on April 8th, 2019 NASA’s Dragonfly Program: Commercialized Robotics - Enabling a New Generation of Evolvable, Resilient Assets in Orbit John Lymer Maxar† Abstract Commercialized, affordable robotics for in-space assembly of large platforms and structures are being prepared for flight in 2021. Integrating easily with standard GEO and LEO satellite command and control architectures, these automation systems enable a new operating paradigm for on-orbit assets – one that includes incremental growth, on-demand payload refresh to match user needs, and in-situ warehousing for rapid expansion, augmentation, or dispersion on a timeline independent of launch. Introduction The Dragonfly Robotic System, developed first as a DARPA seedling and then maturing through the NASA Tipping Point Program, successfully completed a ground demonstration in late 2017, shown in Figure 1 assembling a Ka band antenna. Critical Design Review occurred in 2018. Ultra-lightweight and affordable, the Dragonfly Robotic System is designed to fit into existing satellite command and data handling (C&DH) subsystems and low rate command/telemetry links for inexpensive integration – it behaves like any other satellite subsystem. The supervised autonomy operating concept facilitates command and control from a standard Mission Operations Center. Current satellite operations personnel can plan and execute robotic operations with only minor additional training. Dragonfly represents the first ‘commercialized’ robotic system – affordable and accessible to satellite owners without the risk of infrastructure changes. † The operations of DigitalGlobe, SSL and Radiant Solutions were unified under the Maxar brand in February. MDA continues to operate as an independent business unit within the Maxar organization.
    [Show full text]
  • An Impacting Descent Probe for Europa and the Other Galilean Moons of Jupiter
    An Impacting Descent Probe for Europa and the other Galilean Moons of Jupiter P. Wurz1,*, D. Lasi1, N. Thomas1, D. Piazza1, A. Galli1, M. Jutzi1, S. Barabash2, M. Wieser2, W. Magnes3, H. Lammer3, U. Auster4, L.I. Gurvits5,6, and W. Hajdas7 1) Physikalisches Institut, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland, 2) Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Kiruna, Sweden, 3) Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Graz, Austria, 4) Institut f. Geophysik u. Extraterrestrische Physik, Technische Universität, Braunschweig, Germany, 5) Joint Institute for VLBI ERIC, Dwingelo, The Netherlands, 6) Department of Astrodynamics and Space Missions, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands 7) Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland. *) Corresponding author, [email protected], Tel.: +41 31 631 44 26, FAX: +41 31 631 44 05 1 Abstract We present a study of an impacting descent probe that increases the science return of spacecraft orbiting or passing an atmosphere-less planetary bodies of the solar system, such as the Galilean moons of Jupiter. The descent probe is a carry-on small spacecraft (< 100 kg), to be deployed by the mother spacecraft, that brings itself onto a collisional trajectory with the targeted planetary body in a simple manner. A possible science payload includes instruments for surface imaging, characterisation of the neutral exosphere, and magnetic field and plasma measurement near the target body down to very low-altitudes (~1 km), during the probe’s fast (~km/s) descent to the surface until impact. The science goals and the concept of operation are discussed with particular reference to Europa, including options for flying through water plumes and after-impact retrieval of very-low altitude science data.
    [Show full text]
  • OPAG Update to the Planetary Science Advisory Committee (PAC)
    OPAG Update to the Planetary Science Advisory Committee (PAC) ? Linda Spilker OPAG Vice-Chair, JPL PAC Meeting September 24, 2019 Large KBOs: Outer Planets Assessment Group (OPAG) Charter https://www.lpi.usra.edu/opag/ • NASA's community-based forum to provide science input for planning and prioritizing outer planet exploration activities for the next several decades • Evaluates outer solar system exploration goals, objectives, investigations and required measurements on the basis of the widest possible community outreach • Meets twice per year, summer and winter – Next meeting: Feb. 3-4, 2020, LPI, Houston, TX • OPAG documents are inputs to the Decadal Surveys • OPAG and Small Bodies Assessment Group (SBAG) have Joint custody of Pluto system and other planets among Kuiper Belt Objects KBO planets OPAG Steering Committee Jeff Moore Linda Spilker OPAG Chair OPAG Vice-Chair * =New Member Ames Research Center Jet Propulsion Lab Alfred McEwen Lynnae Quick* Kathleen Mandt* University of Arizona NASA Goddard Applied Physics Laboratory OPAG Steering Committee Scott Edgington Amanda Hendrix Mark Hofstadter Jet Propulsion Lab Planetary Science Institute Jet Propulsion Lab Terry Hurford Carol Paty Goddard Space Flight Center Georgia Institute of Technology OPAG Steering Committee Morgan Cable* Britney Schmidt Kunio Sayanagi Jet Propulsion Lab Georgia Institute of Technology Hampton University * =New Member Tom Spilker* Abigail Rymer* Consultant Applied Physics Lab Recent and Upcoming OPAG-related Meetings • OPAG Subsurface Needs for Ocean Worlds
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Dragonfly Entry Aerosciences Measurements (Dream) J
    Overview of Dragonfly Entry Aerosciences Measurements (DrEAM) J. Santos1, A. Brandis2, H. Hwang1, A. Gülhan3, T. Thiele3, F. Siebe3, 1NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA; 2AMA, Inc. at NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA; 3German Aerospace Center (DLR e.V.), Supersonic and Hypersonic Technologies Department, Linder Höhe, 51147 Köln, Germany. Abstract: NASA Ames Research Center (ARC) (COSSTA). Since the methane concentration in the Ti- leads the Dragonfly Entry Aerosciences Measurements tan atmosphere is directly proportional to the radiative (DrEAM) project, which is an aeroshell instrumentation heat flux, the COSSTA measurements will be used to suite on the Dragonfly mission that fulfills the Engineer- reduce the current uncertainty in the methane volume ing Science Investigation requirement for the New fraction. Atmospheric density measurements and cap- Frontiers mission. NASA ARC is partnering with sule aerodynamic data will be obtained through the NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) and the Ger- onboard Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU), supple- man Aerospace Center (DLR) to provide a comprehen- mented by pressure transducers similar to those used by sive sensor suite, including a DLR-provided Data Ac- the MEDLI and MEDLI2 projects. The DrEAM pres- quisition System (DAS). DrEAM will provide key aer- sure sensors will be known as the Dragonfly Atmos- othermodynamic data and performance analysis for pheric Flight Transducers. (DrAFT). The pressure Dragonfly’s forebody and backshell Thermal Protection measurements, when combined with data from the on- System (TPS). board IMU, will allow for reconstruction of such quan- Titan’s atmosphere predominantly consists of nitro- tities as vehicle Mach number, freestream density, and gen (~98% by mole) with small amounts of methane atmospheric winds.
    [Show full text]
  • ICEE-2) Program Mitch Schulte, Discipline ScienSt Planetary Science Division NASA Headquarters Europa Lander SDT – Science Trace Matrix
    Instrument Concepts for Europa Exploraon (ICEE-2) Program Mitch Schulte, Discipline Scien3st Planetary Science Division NASA Headquarters Europa Lander SDT – Science Trace Matrix Instrument classes: organic compound analysis (oca), microscope for life detection (mld), vibrational spectrometer (vs), context remote sensing imager (crsi), geophysical sounding system (gss), lander infrastructure sensors for science (liss). LISS not called in ICEE-2. Note: Goal 1 has been rescoped to focus on searching for biosignatures. Europa Lander SDT – Model payload ICEE-2 Program NRA* released: 17 May 2018 Step 1 Proposals due: 22 June 2018 Change in POC: 18 July 2018 Step 2 Proposals due: 24 August 2018 Submitted Proposals: 44 Step 2 Proposals were submitted, 43 of which were compliant and reviewed Government Shutdown: 22 December 2018-25 January 2019 Awards announced: 8 February 2019 *Reminder: This was an NRA, not an AO. ICEE-2 Program • The Instrument Concepts for Europa Exploration (ICEE) 2 program supports the development of instruments and sample transfer mechanism(s) for Europa surface exploration. The goal of the program is to advance both the technical readiness and spacecraft accommodation of instruments and the sampling system for a potential future Europa lander mission. • All awardees required to collaborate with the pre-project NASA-JPL spacecraft team and potentially other awardees. • The ICEE 2 program also seeks to mature the accommodation of instruments on the lander, especially regarding the sampling system. • While specific technology readiness levels (TRL) are not prescribed for the ICEE 2 program, instrument concepts must be at TRL 6 in the 2021/2022 timeframe. ICEE-2 Program • Proposal Information Package (PIP) and Environmental Requirements Document (ERD) provided by JPL team.
    [Show full text]
  • Outer Planets Assessment Group (OPAG) View of Decadal Survey
    Outer Solar System: Many Worlds to Explore Outer Planets Assessment Group (OPAG) View of Decadal Survey Progress May 2017 Alfred McEwen, OPAG Chair LPL, University of Arizona This presentation will address (relevant to OPAG): • 1. Most important new discoveries 2011-2017 – (V&V writing was completed in late 2010) • 2. Progress made in implementing Decadal advice – Flight investigations • Flagship Missions • New Frontiers – R&A and infrastructure – Technology • 3. Other issues relevant to the committee’s statement of task – Smallsats for Outer Planet Exploration – How to make the Discovery Program useful for Outer Planets – Europa Lander – Coordination with ESA JUICE mission – Adding Ocean Worlds to New Frontiers 4 – Future mission studies to prepare for next Decadal • 4. Summary grade recommendations on Decadal progress • 5. OPAG top recommendations to mid-term review 1. Most Important New Discoveries 2011-present • Jupiter system: – Europa plate tectonics (Prockter et al., 2014) – Europa cryovolcanism (Quick et al., 2017; Prockter et al., 2017) – Europa plumes (Roth et al., 2014; Sparks et al., 2017) – Confirmation of subsurface ocean in Ganymede (Saur et al., 2015) – Evidence for extensive melt in Io’s mantle (Khurana et al., 2011; Tyler et al., 2015) – Fabulous results from Juno (papers submitted) • Saturn System: – MUCH from Cassini—see upcoming slides • Uranus and Neptune systems: – Standard interior models do not fit observations; Uranus and Neptune may be quite different (Nettelmann et al. 2013) – Intense auroras seen at Uranus (Lamy et al., 2012, 2017) – Weather on Uranus and Neptune confined to a “thin” layer (<1,000 km) (Kaspi et al. 2013) – Ice Giant growing around nearby TW Hydra (Rapson et al., 2015) – Triton’s tidal heating and possible subsurface ocean (Gaeman et al., 2012; Nimmo and Spencer, 2015) • Pluto system—lots of results from New Horizons – The Pluto system is complex in the variety of its landscapes, activity, and range of surface ages.
    [Show full text]
  • March 21–25, 2016
    FORTY-SEVENTH LUNAR AND PLANETARY SCIENCE CONFERENCE PROGRAM OF TECHNICAL SESSIONS MARCH 21–25, 2016 The Woodlands Waterway Marriott Hotel and Convention Center The Woodlands, Texas INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT Universities Space Research Association Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS Stephen Mackwell, Lunar and Planetary Institute Eileen Stansbery, NASA Johnson Space Center PROGRAM COMMITTEE CHAIRS David Draper, NASA Johnson Space Center Walter Kiefer, Lunar and Planetary Institute PROGRAM COMMITTEE P. Doug Archer, NASA Johnson Space Center Nicolas LeCorvec, Lunar and Planetary Institute Katherine Bermingham, University of Maryland Yo Matsubara, Smithsonian Institute Janice Bishop, SETI and NASA Ames Research Center Francis McCubbin, NASA Johnson Space Center Jeremy Boyce, University of California, Los Angeles Andrew Needham, Carnegie Institution of Washington Lisa Danielson, NASA Johnson Space Center Lan-Anh Nguyen, NASA Johnson Space Center Deepak Dhingra, University of Idaho Paul Niles, NASA Johnson Space Center Stephen Elardo, Carnegie Institution of Washington Dorothy Oehler, NASA Johnson Space Center Marc Fries, NASA Johnson Space Center D. Alex Patthoff, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Cyrena Goodrich, Lunar and Planetary Institute Elizabeth Rampe, Aerodyne Industries, Jacobs JETS at John Gruener, NASA Johnson Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center Justin Hagerty, U.S. Geological Survey Carol Raymond, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Lindsay Hays, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Paul Schenk,
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration of the Jovian System by EJSM (Europa Jupiter System Mission): Origin of Jupiter and Evolution of Satellites
    Trans. JSASS Aerospace Tech. Japan Vol. 8, No. ists27, pp. Tk_35-Tk_38, 2010 Topics Exploration of the Jovian System by EJSM (Europa Jupiter System Mission): Origin of Jupiter and Evolution of Satellites 1) 2) 2) 2) 3) By Sho SASAKI , Masaki FUJIMOTO , Takeshi TAKASHIMA , Hajime YANO , Yasumasa KASABA , 4) 4) 2) 2) Yukihiro TAKAHASHI , Jun KIMURA , Tatsuaki OKADA , Yasuhiro KAWAKATSU , 2) 2) 2) 2) 2) Yuichi TSUDA , Jun-ichiro KAWAGUCHI , Ryu FUNASE , Osamu MORI , Mutsuko MORIMOTO , 5) 6) 7) Masahiro IKOMA , Takeshi NAGANUMA , Atsushi YAMAJI , 8) 9) Hauke HUSSMANN , Kei KURITA and JUPITER WORKING GROUP 1)National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Oshu, Japan 2)The Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, JAXA, Sagamihara, Japan 3)Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan 4)Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan 5)Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan 6)Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan 7)Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan 8)German Aerospace Center, Berlin, Germany 9)Earthquake Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Received July 16th, 2009) EJSM (Europa Jupiter System Mission) is a planned Jovian system mission with three spacecraft aiming at coordinated observations of the Jovian satellites especially Europa and the magnetosphere, atmosphere and interior of Jupiter. It was formerly called "Laplace" mission. In October 2007, it was selected as one of future ESA scientific missions Cosmic Vision (2015-2025). From the beginning, Japanese group is participating in the discussion process of the mission. JAXA will take a role on the magnetosphere spinner JMO (Jupiter Magnetosphere Orbiter). On the other hand, ESA will take charge of JGO (Jupiter Ganymede Orbiter) and NASA will be responsible for JEO (Jupiter Europa Orbiter).
    [Show full text]
  • Titan and Enceladus $1 B Mission
    JPL D-37401 B January 30, 2007 Titan and Enceladus $1B Mission Feasibility Study Report Prepared for NASA’s Planetary Science Division Prepared By: Kim Reh Contributing Authors: John Elliott Tom Spilker Ed Jorgensen John Spencer (Southwest Research Institute) Ralph Lorenz (The Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory) KSC GSFC ARC Approved By: _________________________________ Kim Reh Dr. Ralph Lorenz Jet Propulsion Laboratory The Johns Hopkins University, Applied Study Manager Physics Laboratory Titan Science Lead _________________________________ Dr. John Spencer Southwest Research Institute Enceladus Science Lead Pre-decisional — For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only Titan and Enceladus Feasibility Study Report Table of Contents JPL D-37401 B The following members of an Expert Advisory and Review Board contributed to ensuring the consistency and quality of the study results through a comprehensive review and advisory process and concur with the results herein. Name Title/Organization Concurrence Chief Engineer/JPL Planetary Flight Projects Gentry Lee Office Duncan MacPherson JPL Review Fellow Glen Fountain NH Project Manager/JHU-APL John Niehoff Sr. Research Engineer/SAIC Bob Pappalardo Planetary Scientist/JPL Torrence Johnson Chief Scientist/JPL i Pre-decisional — For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only Titan and Enceladus Feasibility Study Report Table of Contents JPL D-37401 B This page intentionally left blank ii Pre-decisional — For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only Titan and Enceladus Feasibility Study Report Table of Contents JPL D-37401 B Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Study Objectives and Guidelines............................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Relation to Cassini-Huygens, New Horizons and Juno.......................................... 1-1 1.3 Technical Approach...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Program Book
    46th Meeting of the Division for Planetary Sciences with Historical Astronomy Division (HAD) 9-14 November 2014 | Tucson, AZ OFFICERS AND MEMBERS ........ 2 SPONSORS ............................... 2 EXHIBITORS .............................. 3 FLOOR PLANS ........................... 5 ATTENDEE SERVICES ................. 8 Session Numbering Key SCHEDULE AT-A-GLANCE ........ 10 100s Monday 200s Tuesday SUNDAY ................................. 20 300s Wednesday 400s Thursday MONDAY ................................ 23 500s Friday TUESDAY ................................ 44 Sessions are numbered in the program book by day and time. WEDNESDAY .......................... 75 All posters will be on display Monday - Friday THURSDAY.............................. 85 FRIDAY ................................. 119 Changes after 1 October are included only in the online program materials. AUTHORS INDEX .................. 137 1 DPS OFFICERS AND MEMBERS Current DPS Officers Heidi Hammel Chair Bonnie Buratti Vice-Chair Athena Coustenis Secretary Andrew Rivkin Treasurer Nick Schneider Education and Public Outreach Officer Vishnu Reddy Press Officer Current DPS Committee Members Rosaly Lopes Term Expires November 2014 Robert Pappalardo Term Expires November 2014 Ralph McNutt Term Expires November 2014 Ross Beyer Term Expires November 2015 Paul Withers Term Expires November 2015 Julie Castillo-Rogez Term Expires October 2016 Jani Radebaugh Term Expires October 2016 SPONSORS 2 EXHIBITORS Platinum Exhibitor Silver Exhibitors 3 EXHIBIT BOOTH ASSIGNMENTS 206 Applied
    [Show full text]
  • Valuing Life Detection Missions Edwin S
    Valuing life detection missions Edwin S. Kite* (University of Chicago), Eric Gaidos (University of Hawaii), Tullis C. Onstott (Princeton University). * [email protected] Recent discoveries imply that Early Mars was habitable for life-as-we-know-it (Grotzinger et al. 2014); that Enceladus might be habitable (Waite et al. 2017); and that many stars have Earth- sized exoplanets whose insolation favors surface liquid water (Dressing & Charbonneau 2013, Gaidos 2013). These exciting discoveries make it more likely that spacecraft now under construction – Mars 2020, ExoMars rover, JWST, Europa Clipper – will find habitable, or formerly habitable, environments. Did these environments see life? Given finite resources ($10bn/decade for the US1), how could we best test the hypothesis of a second origin of life? Here, we first state the case for and against flying life detection missions soon. Next, we assume that life detection missions will happen soon, and propose a framework (Fig. 1) for comparing the value of different life detection missions: Scientific value = (Reach × grasp × certainty × payoff) / $ (1) After discussing each term in this framework, we conclude that scientific value is maximized if life detection missions are flown as hypothesis tests. With hypothesis testing, even a nondetection is scientifically valuable. Should the US fly more life detection missions? Once a habitable environment has been found and characterized, life detection missions are a logical next step. Are we ready to do this? The case for emphasizing habitable environments, not life detection: Our one attempt to detect life, Viking, is viewed in hindsight as premature or at best uncertain. In-space life detection experiments are expensive.
    [Show full text]
  • Banks in Lebanon
    932-933.qxd 14/01/2011 09:13 Õ Page 2 AL BAYAN BUSINESS GUIDE USEFUL NUMBERS Airport International Calls (100) Ports - Information (1) 628000-629065/6 Beirut (1) 580211/2/3/4/5/6 - 581400 - ADMINISTRATION (1) 629125/130 Internal Security Forces (112) Byblos (9) 540054 - Customs (1) 629160 Chika (6) 820101 National Defense (1701) (1702) Jounieh (9) 640038 Civil Defence (125) Saida (7) 752221 Tripoli (6) 600789 Complaints & Review (119) Ogero (1515) Tyr (7) 741596 Consumer Services Protection (1739) Police (160) Water Beirut (1) 386761/2 Red Cross (140) Dbaye (4) 542988- 543471 Electricity (145) (1707) Barouk (5) 554283 Telephone Repairs (113) Jounieh (9) 915055/6 Fire Department (175) Metn (1) 899416 Saida (7) 721271 General Security (1717) VAT (1710) Tripoli (6) 601276 Tyr (7) 740194 Information (120) Weather (1718) Zahle (8) 800235/722 ASSOCIATIONS, SYNDICATES & OTHER ORGANIZATIONS - MARBLE AND CEMENT (1)331220 KESRWAN (9)926135 BEIRUT - PAPER & PACKAGING (1)443106 NORTH METN (4)926072-920414 - PHARMACIES (1)425651-426041 - ACCOUNTANTS (1)616013/131- (3)366161 SOUTH METN (5)436766 - PLASTIC PRODUCERS (1)434126 - ACTORS (1)383407 - LAWYERS - PORT EMPLOYEES (1) 581284 - ADVERTISING (1)894545 - PRESS (1)865519-800351 ALEY (5)554278 - AUDITOR (1)322075 BAABDA (5)920616-924183 - ARTIST (1)383401 - R.D.C.L. (BUSINESSMEN) (1)320450 DAIR AL KAMAR (5)510244 - BANKS (1)970500 - READY WEAR (3)879707-(3)236999 - CARS DRIVERS (1)300448 - RESTAURANTS & CAFE (1)363040 JBEIL (9)541640 - CHEMICAL (1)499851/46 - TELEVISIONS (5)429740 JDEIDET EL METN (1)892548 - CONTRACTORS (5)454769 - TEXTILLES (5)450077-456151 JOUNIEH (9)915051-930750 - TOURISM JOURNALISTS (1)349251 - DENTISTS (1)611222/555 - SOCKS (9)906135 - TRADERS (1)347997-345735 - DOCTORS (1)610710 - TANNERS (9)911600 - ENGINEERS (1)850111 - TRADERS & IND.
    [Show full text]