The National Data Center Preparedness Exercise 2013 A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The National Data Center Preparedness Exercise 2013 A The National Data Center Preparedness Exercise 2013 a complex scenario for multi-technology analysis J. Ole Ross, Gernot Hartmann, Lars Ceranna, Nicolai Gestermann, and Christian Bönnemann BGR / B4.3, German NDC Science & Technology Vienna, 24 June 2015 Science & Technology 24 June 2015 Page 1 National Data Centre Preparedness Exercises (NPE) NPE are Ø Scenarios of potential CTBT violation (partially simulated) Ø Open to all NDCs and other Institutions engaged with CTBT verification Ø Discussed at NDC Workshops (former “NDC Evaluation Workshop”) NPE can improve Ø Effectiveness of verification procedures at NDCs Ø Awareness of potential needs concerning data products and skills Ø Communication among NDCs and with PTS Ø Analysis of multi-technology scenarios Ø Exchange between experts from various disciplines Science & Technology 24 June 2015 Page 2 NPE 2013 Scenario Initial Situation A State Signatory points to a spatio-temporal connection of a waveform event in a certain area and (fictitious) radionuclide detections in Central Europe in September 2013. The NPE-community is asked to give technical advise and to verify whether the hypothesis of the accusing state is justified or not Verification Task • Identification and characterisation of the waveform event • Analysis of radionuclide detections, source characterization, ATM backtracking • Decision on potential CTBT relevance • Overall question: Would it be adequate to request an On-Site-Inspection? Science & Technology 24 June 2015 Page 3 Information provided with NPE 2013 Scenario Time of waveform event 4 September 2013 Region of waveform event The fictitious State of FRISIA in Central Europe Radionuclide Findings: Iodine 5-24 µBq/m³ 131I first VIP00, Coll.Stop 8 Sep. highest SEP63,Coll.Stop 13 Sep. Xenon 0.4-26 mBq/m³ 133Xe, first DEX33, Coll.Stop 11 Sep. highest SEX63, Coll.Stop 13 Sep. Some samples 131mXe, ratio 131m/133 0.019 – 0.027 Science & Technology 24 June 2015 Page 4 Challenges of NPE 2013 • No REB for waveform event in FRISIA - Regional stations can be used - 2 IMS Primary, 4 Auxiliary stations • Unfavourable meteorological conditions for ATM -long transport times to stations -ambiguous WebGrape PSR Xe-133 I-131 Science & Technology 24 June 2015 Page 5 NPE 2013 Supplementary Information Was provided to requesting paticipants only: Waveform analysis: W1 Waveform detection lists of relevant IMS Primary and Auxiliary Seismic Stations as provided by the PTS W2 Source parameter of the waveform event which caused the suspicion against FRISIA W3 Statement of FRISIA about the character of the event Atmospheric Transport Modelling: A1 Number of radionuclide release locations and emission pulses A2 Time of radionuclide release A3 Indication of radionuclide source region Science & Technology 24 June 2015 Page 6 Supplementary Information W3 W3 Statement by the state of FRISIA concerning the waveform event: “The event in question is an earthquake which occurred in the vicinity of Groningen on 4 September 2013. Following the analysis of the local experts from KNMI (Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute), this seismic event is very likely to be connected with gas exploration activities in this area. Induced seismicity is regularly observed at natural gas production fields in "FRISIA". Therefore, no release of radioactive substances was connected with the seismic event. Furthermore, all nuclear facilities in "FRISIA" operated normally without any known incident or unusual release throughout the days before and after 4 September 2013. Source: KNMI Science & Technology 24 June 2015 Page 7 Waveform recordings at selected seismic stations 296 km Distance to Pn 295 km epicentre Pn Pg 295 km 265 km P P S n g n Sg 243 km Pn P g Sn 217 km Pn 187 km Sg 184 km Pn Sg 135 km Pg 128 km P g Sg 117 km Filter: 1 – 8 Hz Science & Technology 24 June 2015 Wavform event: Earthquake in gas field Appingedam Groningen • Reference location from KNMI calculated with phases from 14 local stations unknown accuracy • Inspection Area of 500 km2 size would be sufficient in case of an OSI Science & Technology 24 June 2015 Page 9 Atmospheric Transport Modelling / Radionuclide Analysis Xe-133 I-131 à Many possible source locations à Connection of xenon and iodine unclear à Northern detections consistent with release in Frisia Large variety of solutions presented at the NDC Workshop 2014 à Isotopic ratio analysis helps Science & Technology 24 June 2015 Page 10 Solution of FOI, Swedish NDC 131mXe/133Xe ratios measured at NOX49, SEX63 and RUX58 ”Are consistent with xenon released after shutdown of a nuclear reactor, if the shutdown occurred several days before the event in Frisia.” The conclusions of the Swedish NDC are: • The observed seismic event is most likely an induced event in connection to the Groningen gas field • The xenon isotope ratios are not consistent with a nuclear explosion, rather a nuclear power plant Source FOI ( Anders Ringbom, Anders Axelsson, Anders Mörtsell ) 11 Science & Technology 24 June 2015 NPE 2013 radionuclide release scenario Fictitious scenario – very unlikely to happen in reality! Reactor incident at a Boiling Water Reactor location in Southern Germany: 48.5 N 10.4 E ~ 600 km distance to FRISIA seismic event Imaginary event sequence (INES 3): 1. reactor shut down because of fuel damage 2. temporal partial loss of primary coolant 3. contamination inside reactor building 4. cooling recovered, reactor under control Isotope I-131 Xe-131m Xe-133 Xe-133m Xe-135 Half-lifeSmall (h) leakage192.5 in containment286.4 leads125.8 to atmospheric52.6 release9.1 of volatile substances (<0.1 % of core inventory) on 4 Sept 2013 Source Term 5 TBq 10 TBq 1 PBq < 25 TBq < 1 PBq MDCThis release 5is µ pureBq/m ³NPE2013 0.15 fantasy mBq/m³ – nothing0.35 mBq similar/m³ 0.15occurred mBq/m in³ September0.7 mBq/m 2013³ Science & Technology 24 June 2015 Page 12 NPE 2013 forward ATM Xe-133 I-131 0.1 mBq/m³ 10 mBq/m³ 1 Bq/m³ 1 µBq/m³ 100 µBq/m³ Forward ATM setup Model run Xenon A Xenon B Iodine • HYSPLIT (NOAA-ARL) release day 09/04 09/04 09/04 • Meteorology: NCEP GDAS • horizontal resolution 0.5° time (UTC) 00 – 03 12-15 12-15 • 45 vertical levels deposition No No Yes • 500000 Particles per simulation Science & Technology 24 June 2015 Page 13 NPE 2013 backward ATM Xenon WebGRAPE PSR Xenon 2013/09/04 00-03 UTC 220 km FLEXPART- ECMWF Distance PSR – source (only) 220 km Science & Technology 24 June 2015 Page 14 NPE 2013 backward ATM Iodine WebGRAPE PSR Iodine 2013/09/04 12-15 UTC FLEXPART- ECMWF Distance Local PSR maximum- Source 440 km Science & Technology 24 June 2015 Page 15 Key station: VIP00 Vienna Differential Field Of Regard for VIP00 sample of Sep. 8 release time I-131 2013/09/04 12-15 UTC FLEXPART-ECMWF FLEXPART-NCEP Science & Technology 24 June 2015 Page 16 Discussions potentially triggered Waveform • SEL event definition: include Auxiliary Seismic Stations? The event was detected at Primary Stations: GERES, NOA Auxiliary Stations: EKA, DAVOX, VRAC, HFS Radionuclide / ATM • How to categorize collocated Particulate / Noble Gas Detections? • Limitations of source localization • “Old explosions” as detections in April 2013 following DPRK test after ~55 days Diplomacy • How to react on false accusation? • What is necessary/sufficient to request an OSI • Role of National Technical Means Science & Technology 24 June 2015 Page 17 Evolution of NPE scenarios Next NPE scenario: - International control team - New ideas welcome - Discussion and planning at NDC Session on Friday morning NPE 2007 NPE 2008 NPE 2009 NPE 2010 NPE 2012 NPE 2013 Iran: Zagros Chile Kazakhstan USA, Russia, FRISIA, Mountain Wyoming South West Sibiria Central Europe Earthquake Earthquake Blast: Blast: Black (Double)-Blast: Earthquake in gas Kara Zhyra Mine Thunder Mine Mezhdurechensk field; unrelated RN reactor release S waveforms S waveforms SI waveforms RN /ATM RN / ATM S waveforms ATM ATM / RN SI waveforms SI waveforms RN / ATM WMO exercise WMO exercise WMO exercise WMO exercise Science & Technology 24 June 2015 Page 18 .
Recommended publications
  • Special Report on the Earthquake Density and Activity Rate Following the Earthquakes in Appingedam (ML=1.8) and Scharmer (ML=1.5) in August 2017
    Special Report on the earthquake density and activity rate following the earthquakes in Appingedam (ML=1.8) and Scharmer (ML=1.5) in August 2017 Datum September 2017 Editors Jan van Elk & Dirk Doornhof 1 Special Report on the earthquake density and activity rate following the earthquakes in Appingedam (ML=1.8) and Scharmer (ML=1.5) in August 2017 2 Special Report on the earthquake density and activity rate following the earthquakes in Appingedam (ML=1.8) and Scharmer (ML=1.5) in August 2017 Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 5 2 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................... 7 3 Operating the Meet- en Regelprotocol ...................................................................... 8 4 Appingedam M L = 1.8 earthquake overview ............................................................ 10 5 Schamer M L = 1.5 earthquake overview ................................................................. 14 6 Earthquake density ................................................................................................. 16 6.1 Development of Earthquake Density ................................................................ 16 6.2 Earthquakes contributing to threshold exceedance .......................................... 18 6.3 Detailed analysis of the earthquakes in the Appingedam – Loppersum area ... 23 7 Reservoir analysis: Pressure & Production ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 180129 Vb Samenvatting Verd
    Inpassingsvisie verdubbeling N33, samenvatting Zuidbroek-Appingedam Inleiding De N33 Midden tussen Zuidbroek en Appingedam wordt verdubbeld. Daarmee wordt aangesloten op het deel tussen Zuidbroek en Assen dat de afgelopen jaren al is aangepakt (de N33 Zuid). Deze Inpassingsvisie brengt de ruimtelijke kansen en knelpunten in beeld voor het gebied waar de N33 Midden wordt aangelegd. De visie vormt daarmee de basis voor de verdere planuitwerking, bij het opstellen en uitwerken van alternatieven en de ruimtelijke beoordeling in het MER. Daarnaast vormt de visie het fundament voor de uitwerking van het Voorkeursalternatief (in 2018) in een Landschapsplan. Het opstellen van de Inpassingsvisie is begeleid door Rijkswaterstaat en de provincie Groningen, alsmede door een klankbordgroep met daarin verschillende overheden en maatschappelijke groeperingen. Verder is een intensieve werksessie gehouden met inwoners en vertegenwoordigers van de dorpen Siddeburen (en omgeving) en Tjuchem. Zij worden ook bij het vervolg van de planontwikkeling betrokken. Naast verdubbelen en behoud van het huidige bestaand tracé en varianten B, tracé zijn vier andere alternatieven die alle een C, X1 en X2 andere doorsnijding van het gebied ten noorden van Tjuchem tonen. Alternatief B betreft een kortere route met bogen om Tjuchem heen. Alternatief C gaat met een aantal bogen naar het noorden. De alternatieven X1 en X2 zijn voorgesteld door een inwonerscollectief en passen zoveel mogelijk in de huidige verkavelingstructuur. Legenda analyse gebied De Inpassingsvisie bestaat uit drie open zeeklei landschap hoofdonderdelen: een analyse (van gebied, beleid en tracé), de Ruimtelijke Visie en de Duurswold; wisselend open en besloten Inpassingsvisie zelf. Deze drie onderdelen open zand/ veen landschap worden hieronder kort samengevat.
    [Show full text]
  • Loppersum Zuidlaren Delfzijl Het Zandt Lageland Hooghalen Froombosch Sint Annen Meedhuizen Harkstede Nieuw Annerveen Appingedam
    3.5 Huizinge Bergen Westeremden Roswinkel Roswinkel Bergen Roswinkel Bergen Loppersum Garrelsweer Zandeweer 3.0 Noordzee Hellum Bergen Garrelsweer Stedum Zeerijp Garrelsweer Het Zandt Roswinkel Zandeweer Assen Roswinkel Geelbroek De Hoeve Zeerijp Garmerwolde Scharmer Kwadijk Assen Roswinkel Onderdendam Toornwerd Roswinkel Roswinkel Roswinkel Schoorl Westeremden Westeremden Noordzee ZandeweerZeerijp Wirdum 2.5 Eleveld Geelbroek Assen Roswinkel Zeerijp Eleveld Harkstede Noordzee AppingedamHuizinge Noordzee Noordzee Froombosch Slochteren Hooghalen LoppersumSteendam Smilde Westeremden Ekehaar Holwierde Waddenzee (nabij Usquert) Uithuizen Noordzee UithuizenLeermens Noordzee (nabij Castricum) Noordzee Middelstum Roswinkel Wirdum Roswinkel Uithuizen Garrelsweer Froombosch Westerwijtwerd Leermens Overschild Wirdum Annen Froombosch Zuidlaren Anloo Jisp Ravenswoud Middelstum Westeremden Westeremden Garsthuizen Zeerijp Geelbroek Ten Post Godlinze Schildwolde Appingedam Appingedam Anna Paulowna Emmen Meedhuizen Emmen Slochteren Wachtum Nieuw Annerveen Stedum Middelstum Sappemeer Overschild Garsthuizen Garsthuizen Zeerijp NoordzeeMiddelstum Wirdum 2.0 Roden Roswinkel Het Zandt Roswinkel Zandeweer Roswinkel Zeerijp Froombosch Noordzee Lageland Rottum Slochteren Zuidwolde Schildwolde Zeerijp Eppenhuizen Garsthuizen Annen Huizinge Middelstum Roswinkel Zandeweer Zeerijp Ekehaar Oosterwijtwerd Westeremden Loppersum Emmen Froombosch Sappemeer Zeerijp Sappemeer WaddenzeeGarrelsweerWirdum (nabij Eemshaven) Noordzee (nabij Castricum) Appingedam Assen Appingedam
    [Show full text]
  • Bodemkundig-Hydrologisch Onderzoek Voor De Waardebepaling Van De Gronden in Het Ruilverkavelingsgebied Appingedam-Delfzijl
    Bodemkundig-hydrologisch onderzoek voor de waardebepaling van de gronden in het ruilverkavelingsgebied Appingedam-Delfzijl Bodemkundig-hydrologisch onderzoek voor de waardebepaling van de gronden in het ruilverkavelingsgebied Appingedam-Delfzijl E. Kiestra Alterra rapport 252 Alterra, Research Instituut voor de Groene Ruimte, Wageningen, 2001 REFERAAT Kiestra, E., 2001. Bodemkundig-hydrologisch onderzoek voor de waardebepaling van de gronden in het ruilverkavelingsgebied Appingedam-Delfzijl. Wageningen, Alterra, Research Instituut voor de Groene Ruimte. Alterra- rapport 252. 43 blz.; 4 fig.; 1 tab.; 8 ref.; 3 aanh.; 2 kaarten Het gebied Appingedam-Delfzijl bestaat uit holocene zeekleiafzettingen. Alle afzettingen die aan of nabij het oppervlak voorkomen dateren uit verschillende Duinkerke transgressiefasen. In het noorden komen hooggelegen, oude kwelder- en oeverwallen voor. Ze bestaan meestal uit zavel. Naar het zuiden toe worden de gronden geleidelijk zwaarder. Het gebied wordt doorsneden door voormalige kreken (maren). De talrijke wierden zijn kenmerkende elementen in het open kleilandschap. Binnen de zeekleigronden zijn poldervaaggronden, leek/-woudeerdgronden en tuineerdgronden onderscheiden. Op grond van verschillen in textuur, profiel- en kalkverloop zijn de gronden verder onderverdeeld. In het algemeen is het gebied goed ontwaterd. Er komen veel gronden voor met een GHG tussen 40 en 80 cm - mv. en met een GLG tussen 120 en 180 cm - mv. (VIo). Ondiepere GHG’ s en GLG’ s komen voornamelijk voor langs de maren en op de afgetichelde percelen.. Tijdens het veldwerk is het Actueel Hoogtebestand van Nederland (AHN-bestand) gebruikt als hulpinformatie. Hierdoor is het mogelijk het aantal beschreven boringen te verminderen zonder noemenswaardig kwaliteitsverlies. De resultaten van het veldbodemkundig onderzoek zijn weergegeven op een bodem- en grondwatertrappenkaart (schaal 1 : 10 000).
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Groningen Confronting the Impact of Induced Earthquakes, Netherlands
    Resituating the Local in Cohesion and Territorial Development House in Bedum, damaged by earthquakes (Photo: © Huisman Media). Case Study Report Northeast Groningen Confronting the Impact of Induced Earthquakes, Netherlands Authors: Jan Jacob Trip and Arie Romein, Faculty of Architecture and the Built En- vironment, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands Report Information Title: Case Study Report: Northeast Groningen. Confronting the Impact of Induced Earthquakes, Netherlands (RELOCAL De- liverable 6.2) Authors: Jan Jacob Trip and Arie Romein Version: Final Date of Publication: 29.03.2019 Dissemination level: Public Project Information Project Acronym RELOCAL Project Full title: Resituating the Local in Cohesion and Territorial Develop- ment Grant Agreement: 727097 Project Duration: 48 months Project coordinator: UEF Bibliographic Information Trip JJ and Romein A (2019) Northeast Groningen. Confronting the Impact of Induced Earthquakes, Netherlands. RELOCAL Case Study N° 19/33. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland. Information may be quoted provided the source is stated accurately and clearly. Reproduction for own/internal use is permitted. This paper can be downloaded from our website: https://relocal.eu i Table of Contents List of Figures .................................................................................................................. iii List of Tables .................................................................................................................... iii Abbreviations .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Iabr–Atelier Groningen the Nordic City
    IABR–ATELIER GRONINGEN THE NORDIC CITY The Energy Transition as a Driver for the Next Economy in the City and Region of Groningen COLOPHON IABR–ATELIER GRONINGEN Steering committee Nienke Homan (Member of the Provincial Executive What opportunities for the economic and environmental of Groningen); quality of the city and the region will occur if we facilitate Roeland van der Schaaf (Alderman for the City the energy transition? It was this question that kick- of Groningen); started the IABR–Atelier Groningen. The Atelier developed Rika Pot (Mayor of the Municipality of Appingedam); four prospects in an intensive process of research by Marijke van Beek (Mayor of the Municipality design and exchange with experts and stakeholders of Eemsmond); from the city and the region. From the Biobased North to George Brugmans (Executive Director IABR). Sustainable and Safe Villages, and from Energy Port to Smart Energy City Groningen, the prospects stem from a Project group blueprint of the transition to renewable energy by 2035 Marieke Francke (iabr/UP); and ways in which this could be economically productive. Gerhard te Rijdt (Province of Groningen); The results show that Groningen can become a pioneer, Wouter van Bolhuis (Muncipality of Groningen); once the stakeholders in the energy transition genuinely Harrie Hoek (Eemsdelta Region); get down to business. Enno Zuidema (Eemsdelta Region). The IABR–Atelier Groningen is part of IABR–2016– THE NEXT ECONOMY. PUBLICATION Commissioners Editors Atelier Groningen is a collaboration of the International Jandirk Hoekstra (H+N+S Landscape Architects); Architecture Biennale Rotterdam (IABR) and the Province Marieke Francke (iabr/UP). of Groningen, the Municipality of Groningen, Eemsdelta Region and the Groningen-Assen Region.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transportation “Made by OV- Bureau” How Do We Do It ?
    Public Transportation “Made by OV- bureau” How do we do it ? London 2017, June 8th ir. Erwin Stoker Manager PT development Outline Introduction • Public transportation in the Netherlands • Public transportation in Groningen Drenthe • Franchising history Cases 1. Joint development and business cases 2. Buses 3. Bus depots 4. Personnel 5. Concession Management 6. OV-chipcard and national datawarehouse public transportation I won’t bite ! Concession = Franchise Public transportation in the Netherlands PT in the Netherlands National railways (Main network) Operator: - NS Nederlandse Spoorwegen - 100% public company - Negotiated contract 2015-2025 - Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment Tracks: - Prorail - 100% public company - Negotiated contract 2015-2025 - Maintenance and extensions - Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment PT in the Netherlands: Regional PT 14 responsible public bodies - 12 provinces - Rotterdam/The Hague - Amsterdam Modes: - Regional rail - Metro - Tram - Bus Responsible for tracks/road: - Local or regional road administration Wet Personenvervoer 2000 (PT bill 2000) - Privatisation of (former) provincial and city public transport (bus) companies - Obligation for PTA to franchise all public transportation from 2000 - Exclusive right for 1 operator in a certain area or on a certain line PT in the Netherlands: PT franchises (2017) All bus contracts franchised (Except Rotterdam/The Hague and Amsterdam: negotiated contract) Public transportation in Groningen and Drenthe Population Groningen 570.000 (City of Groningen
    [Show full text]
  • Reinforcements in Opwierde-Zuid, Appingedam: the Social Impact on Its Residents
    Reinforcements in Opwierde-Zuid, Appingedam: the Social Impact on its Residents Irene Numan (S2586401) Master thesis Cultural Geography University of Groningen: Faculty of Spatial Sciences Supervisor: Dirk Strijker Date: 07-08-2018 Summary For the last decade, earthquakes induced by gas extraction have caused damage to buildings in the province of Groningen. Consequently, the complete neighbourhood of Opwierde-Zuid in Appingedam, approximately 460 houses, needs to be reinforced, or demolished and reconstructed with earthquake resistant constructions and materials. This has a large impact on the lives of the residents of Opwierde- Zuid, forcing residents to move out of their homes for an extended amount of time, and entirely changing their homes and lives. As a result, this reinforcement project impacts them on all levels: material, emotional, physiological, social and economic. This study examines the sense of home of residents in Opwierde-Zuid in relation to the reinforcements. A total of nine interviews, with 5 couples and 4 individuals, have been conducted to indicate the social impact of the reinforcements on the residents. The findings show that a home means everything to most people, which symbolizes safety, comfort and rootedness. Due to the reinforcement project, the majority of the participants experience a change in sense of home. The main reasons are a decrease in enjoyment of residency, loss of control towards the home, actions of authorities, disagreement about housing plans and the negative experienced atmosphere in the neighbourhood. Three couples experience a sense of loss towards their homes, which means that project has caused a breaking of bond between these residents and their home.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating Railway Ridership
    28-04-2016 Estimating Railway Ridership DEMAND FOR NEW RAILWAY STATIONS IN THE NETHERLANDS TSJIBBE HARTHOLT S1496352 COMMITTEE: K. GEURS (Chairman) University of Twente L. LA PAIX PUELLO University of Twente T. BRANDS Goudappel Coffeng 0 1 I. SUMMARY Demand estimation for new railway stations is an essential step in determining the feasibility of a new proposed railway stations. Multiple demand estimation models already exist. However these are not always accurate or freely available for use. Therefore a new demand estimation model was developed which is able to provide rail ridership estimations. Main question of this thesis that will be answered is: How can the daily number of passengers of a new train station be forecasted on the basis of departure station choice and network accessibility? Aim is to estimate a demand estimation model which is valid for the whole of the Netherlands and focusses on proposed sprinter train stations. Factors determining total rail ridership Rail ridership can be determined by three main factors: Built environment factors Socio-economic factors Network dependent factors Built environment factors are factors that describe the situation in the direct environment of the station. A subdivision can be made into station environment factors based on the three d’s as described by Cervero and Knockel-man (1997): o Density: Describing the amount of activities in the proximity of the station. This could be the e.g. number of jobs, number of students, shops or total population. o Diversity: describing the diversity of the activities that take place in the proximity of the station. o Design: variables describing the properties of a station (area) as a direct consequence of its design.
    [Show full text]
  • (Hi)Storytelling Churches in the Northern Netherlands "2279
    religions Article “This Is My Place”. (Hi)Storytelling Churches in the Northern Netherlands † Justin E. A. Kroesen Department of Cultural History, University Museum of Bergen, P.O. Box 7800, NO-5020 Bergen, Norway; [email protected] † Article written in the framework of: Project of the Ministry of Science and Innovation AEI/10.13039/501100011033: “Sedes Memoriae 2: Memorias de cultos y las artes del altar en las catedrales medievales hispanas: Oviedo, Pamplona, Roda, Zaragoza, Mallorca, Vic, Barcelona, Girona, Tarragona” (PID2019-105829GB-I00). The author is Council member of Future for Religious Heritage (FRH) since 2020. Prof. Diarmaid MacCulloch (Oxford), Prof. Jan N. Bremmer (Groningen) and Mr. Peter Breukink (Zutphen), former director of the Foundation of Old Groningen Churches, made valuable comments on the manuscript. Abstract: This article proposes storytelling as a tool to return historic church buildings to the people in today’s secularized society. It starts by recognizing the unique qualities shared by most historic churches, namely that they are (1) different from most other buildings, (2) unusually old, and (3) are often characterized by beautiful exteriors and interiors. The argument builds on the storytelling strategies that were chosen in two recent book projects (co-)written by the author of this article, on historic churches in the northern Dutch provinces of Frisia (Fryslân) and Groningen. Among the many stories “told” by the Frisian and Groningen churches and their interiors, three categories are specifically highlighted. First, the religious aspect of the buildings’ history, from which most of its forms, fittings, and imagery are derived, and which increasingly needs to be explained in a largely post-Christian society.
    [Show full text]
  • Herindelingsadvies Eemsdelta
    Herindelingsadvies Eemsdelta Samenvoeging gemeenten Appingedam-Delfzijl-Loppersum Voorwoord Appingedam, Delfzijl en Loppersum: gezamenlijk één krachtige nieuwe gemeente Eemsdelta Voor u ligt het herindelingsadvies voor de nieuw te vormen gemeente Eemsdelta. Dit document is een bewerking van het herindelingsontwerp dat op 29 november 2018 is vastgesteld door de gemeenteraden van Appingedam, Delfzijl en Loppersum (ADL). Met de vorming van de nieuwe gemeente willen we de belangen van onze inwoners, ondernemers en maatschappelijke partners optimaal behartigen. Als nieuwe gemeente acteren we zelfbewust, gaan we uit van onze eigen kracht en willen we financieel gezond zijn en blijven. We voelen ons betrokken bij onze inwoners en zijn ambitieus om de dienstverlening aan onze inwoners goed te organiseren. Nabijheid, overheidsparticipatie en kleinschaligheid zijn belangrijke overlappende waarden van onze drie gemeenten. We willen onze ervaringen op dit terrein met elkaar delen en gezamenlijk een verdere kwaliteitssprong maken. Een gemeente van circa 45.000 inwoners heeft een schaalniveau waarbij we overheidsnabijheid, burgerparticipatie, dorps- en kernenbeleid op een goede wijze en met een menselijke maat kunnen vormgeven. Als nieuwe gemeente van deze omvang zullen we in staat zijn meer taken zelfstandig uit te voeren en wordt een aanzienlijk deel van de huidige samenwerkingsverbanden (gemeenschappelijke regelingen) overbodig. Dat vergroot de slagkracht in de samenwerking. Een nieuwe gemeente op het schaalniveau van de huidige ADL-regio stelt ons in staat ons krachtiger te positioneren ten opzichte van de vraagstukken waar we in onze regio voor staan. Als nieuwe gemeente zullen we ons sterk maken voor de belangen van onze inwoners die de nadelige consequenties ondervinden van de aardbevingen als gevolg van de gaswinning.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Coalitieakkoord Gemeente Eemsdelta 2021-2026.Pdf
    'SAMEN WERKEN AAN ONZE TOEKOMST' COALITIEAKKOORD GEMEENTE EEMSDELTA 2021 - 2026 Voorwoord Op 18 november 2020 vonden in Delfzijl, Appingedam en Loppersum de herindelingsverkiezingen plaats. Bijzondere verkiezingen omdat deze gemeenten per 1 januari 2021 samen verder gaan als de nieuwe gemeente Eemsdelta. Maar ook bijzonder omdat de verkiezingen relatief veel aandacht kregen vanwege de coronamaatregelen. Na een (in)formatieronde zijn wij, de partijen Lokaal Belang Eemsdelta, ChristenUnie, VVD en CDA overeengekomen om in de komende bestuursperiode van 5,5 jaar het eerste dagelijks bestuur van de nieuwe gemeente Eemsdelta te vormen. Een bestuursperiode die zich kenmerkt door grote maatschappelijke uitdagingen. In dit coalitieakkoord zijn de thema’s op hoofdlijnen uitgewerkt. Geen dichtgetimmerd akkoord, maar een akkoord dat gericht is op maximaal draagvlak in samenleving én gemeenteraad. Lokaal Belang Eemsdelta Annalies Usmany- Dallinga Jan Menninga Nick Boersma ChristenUnie Meindert Joostens Ina Schenkel- Zandvoort VVD Hans Ronde Eduard Mulder CDA Pier Prins Bert Raangs 2 COALITIEAKKOORD GEMEENTE EEMSDELTA 2021 - 2026 Inhoudsopgave 1. Inleiding ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Bestuurscultuur......................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]