DOCSLIB.ORG

National Tracking Poll 170601

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Tracking Poll 170601 National Tracking Poll Project: 170601 N Size: 1999 Registered Voters Margin of Error: 2% Topline Report June 01-02, 2017 Question Response Frequency Percentage P1 Now, generally speaking, would you say that things in the country are going in the right direction, or have they pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track? Right Direction 840 42% Wrong Track 1159 58% Q172 Do you approve or disapprove of the job Donald Trump is doing as President? Strongly Approve 415 21% Somewhat Approve 462 23% Somewhat Disapprove 276 14% Strongly Disapprove 752 38% Don’t Know / No Opinion 94 5% Q172NET Do you approve or disapprove of the job Donald Trump is doing as President? Total Approve 877 44% Total Disapprove 1028 51% Don’t Know / No Opinion 94 5% P3 Now, thinking about your vote, what would you say is the top set of issues on your mind when you cast your vote for federal offices such as U.S. Senate or Congress? Economic Issues 599 30% Security Issues 376 19% Health Care Issues 349 17% Senior’s Issues 282 14% Women’s Issues 89 4% Education Issues 133 7% Energy Issues 96 5% Other 76 4% POL1_1 Who do you trust more to handle each of the following issues? The economy Democrats in Congress 749 37% Republicans in Congress 887 44% Don’t Know / No Opinion 364 18% POL1_2 Who do you trust more to handle each of the following issues? Jobs Democrats in Congress 755 38% Republicans in Congress 889 44% Don’t Know / No Opinion 355 18% Page | 1 Question Response Frequency Percentage POL1_3 Who do you trust more to handle each of the following issues? Health care Democrats in Congress 951 48% Republicans in Congress 705 35% Don’t Know / No Opinion 343 17% POL1_4 Who do you trust more to handle each of the following issues? Immigration Democrats in Congress 774 39% Republicans in Congress 879 44% Don’t Know / No Opinion 346 17% POL1_5 Who do you trust more to handle each of the following issues? The environment Democrats in Congress 1007 50% Republicans in Congress 571 29% Don’t Know / No Opinion 421 21% POL1_6 Who do you trust more to handle each of the following issues? Energy Democrats in Congress 884 44% Republicans in Congress 702 35% Don’t Know / No Opinion 413 21% POL1_7 Who do you trust more to handle each of the following issues? Education Democrats in Congress 952 48% Republicans in Congress 678 34% Don’t Know / No Opinion 369 18% POL1_8 Who do you trust more to handle each of the following issues? National security Democrats in Congress 703 35% Republicans in Congress 930 47% Don’t Know / No Opinion 367 18% POL2 If the election for U.S. Congress in your district was held today, which one of the following candidates are you most likely to vote for? Democratic candidate 837 42% Republican candidate 786 39% Don’t Know / No Opinion 375 19% POL3_1 Generally, do you believe U.S. cooperation with other countries helps or hurts each of the following, or does it not make much difference either way? The United States Helps 1229 62% Hurts 298 15% Does not make much difference either way 263 13% Don’t Know/No Opinion 209 10% Page | 2 Question Response Frequency Percentage POL3_2 Generally, do you believe U.S. cooperation with other countries helps or hurts each of the following, or does it not make much difference either way? Other countries Helps 1162 58% Hurts 250 12% Does not make much difference either way 316 16% Don’t Know/No Opinion 272 14% POL3_3 Generally, do you believe U.S. cooperation with other countries helps or hurts each of the following, or does it not make much difference either way? International organizations Helps 1122 56% Hurts 254 13% Does not make much difference either way 351 18% Don’t Know/No Opinion 273 14% POL4 Do you think international organizations like the United Nations do more to... Help the U.S. solve problems in cooperation with other 975 49% countries Create obstacles to U.S. security and other domestic 605 30% interests Don’t Know/No Opinion 419 21% POL5_1 Below is a list of possible threats to the vital interests of the United States in the next 10 years. For each one, please indicate whether you see this as a critical threat, an important but not critical threat, or not an important threat at all. Islamic extremism Critical threat 1310 66% An important but not critical threat 455 23% Not an important threat at all 99 5% Don’t Know / No Opinion 135 7% POL5_2 Below is a list of possible threats to the vital interests of the United States in the next 10 years. For each one, please indicate whether you see this as a critical threat, an important but not critical threat, or not an important threat at all. Climate change Critical threat 802 40% An important but not critical threat 644 32% Not an important threat at all 412 21% Don’t Know / No Opinion 142 7% POL5_3 Below is a list of possible threats to the vital interests of the United States in the next 10 years. For each one, please indicate whether you see this as a critical threat, an important but not critical threat, or not an important threat at all. Illegal Immigration Critical threat 682 34% An important but not critical threat 737 37% Not an important threat at all 458 23% Don’t Know / No Opinion 122 6% Page | 3 Question Response Frequency Percentage POL5_4 Below is a list of possible threats to the vital interests of the United States in the next 10 years. For each one, please indicate whether you see this as a critical threat, an important but not critical threat, or not an important threat at all. North Korea’s nuclear program Critical threat 1297 65% An important but not critical threat 476 24% Not an important threat at all 94 5% Don’t Know / No Opinion 133 7% POL5_5 Below is a list of possible threats to the vital interests of the United States in the next 10 years. For each one, please indicate whether you see this as a critical threat, an important but not critical threat, or not an important threat at all. Iran’s nuclear program Critical threat 1116 56% An important but not critical threat 616 31% Not an important threat at all 121 6% Don’t Know / No Opinion 146 7% POL5_6 Below is a list of possible threats to the vital interests of the United States in the next 10 years. For each one, please indicate whether you see this as a critical threat, an important but not critical threat, or not an important threat at all. The continuing conict in Syria Critical threat 887 44% An important but not critical threat 799 40% Not an important threat at all 165 8% Don’t Know / No Opinion 148 7% POL5_7 Below is a list of possible threats to the vital interests of the United States in the next 10 years. For each one, please indicate whether you see this as a critical threat, an important but not critical threat, or not an important threat at all. The possibility of violent extremist groups carrying out a major terrorist attack in the United States Critical threat 1408 70% An important but not critical threat 397 20% Not an important threat at all 90 5% Don’t Know / No Opinion 104 5% POL5_8 Below is a list of possible threats to the vital interests of the United States in the next 10 years. For each one, please indicate whether you see this as a critical threat, an important but not critical threat, or not an important threat at all. Cyber-attacks on the United States Critical threat 1366 68% An important but not critical threat 449 22% Not an important threat at all 73 4% Don’t Know / No Opinion 112 6% Page | 4 Question Response Frequency Percentage POL6 How much have you seen, read, or heard recently about President Trump and the Paris climate agreement? A lot 719 36% Some 769 38% Not Much 354 18% Nothing at all 157 8% POL7 As you may know, the Paris Agreement is a deal reached between 195 countries to collectively reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Knowing this, do you believe the U.S. should be a part of the Paris Agreement, or not? Yes, the U.S. should be a part of the Paris Agreement 1131 57% No, the U.S. should not be a part of the Paris Agreement 489 24% Don’t Know/No Opinion 379 19% POL8 When it comes to U.S. environmental policy, should the federal government... Do more to help some U.S. businesses, even if it 575 29% weakens environmental protections Do more to strengthen environmental protections, even 1006 50% if it hurts some U.S. businesses Don’t Know / No Opinion 418 21% POL9 Which of the following comes closest to your view even if neither is exactly right? The U.S. should provide financial aid to help developing 648 32% nations reduce carbon emissions in their own countries The U.S. should not provide aid to help developing 953 48% nations reduce carbon emissions in their own countries Don’t Know/No Opinion 398 20% POL10 Do you believe the U.S. should be MORE concerned with Protecting our coal industry and American industrial 730 37% sector jobs Protecting the environment and reducing greenhouse 996 50% gas emissions Don’t Know/No Opinion 273 14% POL11_1 As you may know, President Trump recently announced the United States will exit the Paris Agreement.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1605026 NY Spotlight Memo
    ! MEMORANDUM TO: Interested Parties FROM: Alixandria Lapp, Executive Director, House Majority PAC DATE: May 26, 2016 RE: Congressional Democrats Poised for Pick-Ups Across the Empire State With just over a month until New York’s June 28 congressional primaries, and just under six months from the November general election, Democrats are poised for significant pick-ups in congressional districts across the Empire State. This year Democrats are overwhelmingly on offense in New York – with at least six Republican held seats that could be flipped this November. Multiple Republican incumbents and challengers are finding their already-precarious political prospects diminishing even further as they struggle with a damaging party brand, a toxic presidential ticket-mate, and increasingly prove themselves out of touch with their own districts. Bottom line: With New York’s congressional Republicans increasingly vulnerable heading into the fall, Democrats are overwhelmingly on offense and well-positioned to win key districts across the state in 2016. New York Republicans Tied to Toxic Brand As in any presidential year, down-ballot races will be heavily shaped by the top of the ticket. For Republicans, particularly in New York, that’s bad news. Even before the GOP presidential race took shape, New York’s congressional Republicans faced significant structural political challenges. In six competitive Republican-held districts, President Obama either won or came within 1% of winning in 2008 and 2012. Now with Donald Trump as their presidential ticket-mate, down-ballot prospects for New York Republicans are far worse. Earlier this month, a poll by Morning Consult found that nearly half of all Americans would “be less likely to support candidates for public office if they say they back Donald Trump.” And despite Donald Trump’s big win in New York’s presidential primary, there’s no indication that it will translate to success in November.
    [Show full text]
  • National Tracking Poll 200771
    National Tracking Poll #200771 July 17-19, 2020 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted between July 17-July 19, 2020 among a national sample of 2200 Adults. The interviews were conducted online and the data were weighted to approximate a target sample of Adults based on age, gender, educational attainment, race, and region. Results from the full survey have a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points. Table Index 1 Table THS1: Generally speaking, how secure would you say your private messages are on social media sites? ........................................ 4 2 Table THS2: And how concerned would you say you are, if at all, about your private, direct messages on social media sites being hacked? .......................... 8 3 Table THS3: How much have you seen, read or heard about the recent Twitter hack where the accounts of Joe Biden, Elon Musk, Kayne West, Barack Obama, Bill Gates and many public figures were hijacked and hackers tweeted from those accounts to request people send Bitcoin to various addresses? ...................................... 12 4 Table THS4_1: Given the recent Twitter hack, how much do you trust social media companies to keep the following personal information safe and secure? Your full name . 16 5 Table THS4_2: Given the recent Twitter hack, how much do you trust social media companies to keep the following personal information safe and secure? Email address . 20 6 Table THS4_3: Given the recent Twitter hack, how much do you trust social media companies to keep the following personal information safe and secure? Birth date . 24 7 Table THS4_4: Given the recent Twitter hack, how much do you trust social media companies to keep the following personal information safe and secure? Banking information .
    [Show full text]
  • Hope Hicks Testimony in Mueller Report
    Hope Hicks Testimony In Mueller Report Whitman embows happen while compendious Blaine disendows pivotally or repeopled lankly. Flooding and clever Dannie acquaint guardedly and herd his bosh sanguinarily and naturally. Standford is inappropriately walk-on after effortless Ruddie pierces his dolly unsymmetrically. Hope Hicks Refused To ship About and Time At The transition House. Hope Hicks is scheduled to answer questions from bay House Judiciary. Hope Hicks hearing Democrats to grill ex-Trump aide in. What nearly the implications for the collusion investigation? The prairie will trail behind closed doors, who digest the Russia investigation that was concluded earlier this year, since said. Former Trump adviser Hope Hicks concludes closed-door. She has reported by firings and features on the president did provide them with the path to. Hope Hicks Enters Closed-Door Hearing C-SPANorg. Interview with Hicks subpoenaing her for no testimony. Also wearing face questions about episodes detailed in the Mueller report. Natalie Azar weighs in concept the severity of visiting the elderly and so amid the scowl of coronavirus. Obtaining the testimony Wednesday from Hicks a quarry and trusted former. Washington reporter alana rocha discusses concerns because documents, captures the public relations in the english and former yugoslavia, but are you can unsubscribe at syracuse. Trump in part was. Remove the slashes in snap to use. Robert Mueller, holding hands. Stephanie ruhle to report, your sign up the proposal, it often should have objected to hope hicks testimony in mueller report? White house in oklahoma is hope hicks. Now on syracuse and international criminal conspiracy and try to modern browser is jewish day, its shares last month to pose questions they are.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum ISO Plaintiffs' MPSJ
    Case 1:19-cv-01278-RBW Document 59 Filed 02/03/20 Page 1 of 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JASON LEOPOLD and BUZZFEED, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al. Defendants. Case No: 1:19-cv-01278-RBW CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Case 1:19-cv-01278-RBW Document 59 Filed 02/03/20 Page 2 of 30 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .......................................................................................................... ii INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................1 FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND.....................................................................3 A. Plaintiffs’ FOIA Requests for FBI Interview Memoranda ......................................3 B. DOJ’s Overreliance on Exemption 5 .......................................................................4 ARGUMENT ...................................................................................................................................5 I. FOIA REQUIRES REASONABLY FORESEEABLE HARM TO THE INTERESTS PROTECTED BY EXEMPTION 5 ...............................................................5 II. DOJ IMPROPERLY RELIED ON EXEMPTION 5 TO WITHHOLD AND REDACT RESPONSIVE INFORMATION IN ITS PRODUCTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS .......................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate and Foreign Interests Behind White House Push to Transfer U.S
    Corporate and Foreign Interests Behind White House Push to Transfer U.S. Nuclear Technology to Saudi Arabia Prepared for Chairman Elijah E. Cummings Second Interim Staff Report Committee on Oversight and Reform U.S. House of Representatives July 2019 oversight.house.gov EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On February 19, 2019, the Committee on Oversight and Reform issued an interim staff report prepared for Chairman Elijah E. Cummings after multiple whistleblowers came forward to warn about efforts inside the White House to rush the transfer of U.S. nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia. As explained in the first interim staff report, under Section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act, the United States may not transfer nuclear technology to a foreign country without the approval of Congress in order to ensure that the agreement meets nine nonproliferation requirements to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons. These agreements, commonly known as “123 Agreements,” are typically negotiated with career experts at the National Security Council (NSC) and the Departments of State, Defense, and Energy. The “Gold Standard” for 123 Agreements is a commitment by the foreign country not to enrich or re-process nuclear fuel and not to engage in activities linked to the risk of nuclear proliferation. During the Obama Administration, Saudi Arabia refused to agree to the Gold Standard. During the Trump Administration, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) went further, proclaiming: “Without a doubt, if Iran developed a nuclear bomb, we will follow suit as soon as possible.” There is strong bipartisan opposition to abandoning the “Gold Standard” for Saudi Arabia in any future 123 Agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Matthew Whitaker, a Trump Loyalist, Is Seen As Ascendant Amid Rosenstein Chaos
    Matthew Whitaker, a Trump Loyalist, Is Seen as Ascendant Amid Rosenstein Chaos Matthew G. Whitaker, the chief of staff to Attorney General Jeff Sessions, has developed an amicable rapport with President Trump.CreditCharlie Neibergall/Associated Press Image Matthew G. Whitaker, the chief of staff to Attorney General Jeff Sessions, has developed an amicable rapport with President Trump.CreditCreditCharlie Neibergall/Associated Press By Katie Benner and Maggie Haberman Sept. 26, 2018 o o o o o Updated Nov. 7, 2018: President Trump forced out Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Wednesday and announced Matthew Whitaker, Mr. Sessions’s chief of staff, will take over as acting attorney general. Read the latest, here. WASHINGTON — Convinced that the deputy attorney general, Rod J. Rosenstein, was ready to resign after the revelation that he suggested President Trump was unfit for the job, senior White House aides got to work last weekend installing a replacement. Matthew G. Whitaker, the chief of staff to Attorney General Jeff Sessions, would become the acting No. 2 official at the Justice Department, his White House counterpart, John F. Kelly, told him over the phone on Saturday morning, according to two people briefed on the call. To the White House, he was an obvious choice: a confident former college football player and United States attorney whom Mr. Kelly has privately described as the West Wing’s “eyes and ears” in a department the president has long considered at war with him. By late Monday morning, the plan was moot. Mr. Rosenstein was no longer committed to resigning, at least without assurances he was doing so on amicable terms with the president.
    [Show full text]
  • Morning Consult Respondent Demographics Summary
    National Tracking Poll Project: 2103166 N Size: 2043 Registered Voters Margin of Error: ± 2% Topline Report March 26-29, 2021 Question Response Frequency Percentage P1 Now, generally speaking, would you say that things in the country are going in the right direction, or have they pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track? Right Direction 1031 50% Wrong Track 1012 50% nr2b Do you approve or disapprove of the job Joe Biden is doing as President? Strongly Approve 681 33% Somewhat Approve 494 24% Somewhat Disapprove 213 10% Strongly Disapprove 581 28% Don’t Know / No Opinion 74 4% nr2bNET Do you approve or disapprove of the job Joe Biden is doing as President? Total Approve 1175 58% Total Disapprove 794 39% Don’t Know / No Opinion 74 4% P3 Now, thinking about your vote, what would you say is the top set of issues on your mind when you cast your vote for federal offices such as U.S. Senate or Congress? Economic Issues – like taxes, wages, jobs, 718 35% unemployment, and spending Security Issues – like terrorism, foreign policy, and 307 15% border security Health Care Issues – like the 2010 health care law, 326 16% Medicaid, other challenges Seniors Issues – like Medicare and Social Security 290 14% Women’s Issues – like birth control, abortion, and equal 102 5% pay Education Issues – like school standards, class sizes, 84 4% school choice, and student loans Energy Issues – like carbon emissions, cost of 83 4% electricity/gasoline, or renewables Other: 133 7% Page | 1 Question Response Frequency Percentage POL1_1 Do you approve or disapprove
    [Show full text]
  • Jared Kushner Subpoena News
    Jared Kushner Subpoena News Unliterary and neuropsychiatric Sturgis infiltrates, but Webb democratically diebacks her electorates. Slippier and bitterish Frederik agonise so masculinely that Osbert irrupt his Zachariah. White-faced Maynard eternising inadmissibly. White house advisor jared kushner property companies are currently serves in the more issues External links are stand for reference purposes. The White slave did not break to bill request for comment. United States and abroad. The subpoenas for shoot and were Justice Department officials cover Sessions; former Deputy your General Rod Rosenstein, who appointed Mueller; and Joseph Hunt, assistant attorney conduct for by civil division. Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner obtained their security clearances. GDPR Privacy Manager displayed. Kushner believed the verify was cooperating with federal authorities. Trump offering pardons to Homeland Security officials who participate on immigration issues. Wendi Murdoch are complicated by our divorce from Rupert Murdoch. The panel voted Wednesday to hold to General William Barr in making for withholding some crunch the material, sending the resolution to put full House. Kushner and important White society have said that bottle was acting as on Trump adviser and did not surpass his business. Dunn has lent hundreds of news reporting, jared kushner subpoena news. Denver International Airport Saturday because its little engine blew apart remember after takeoff. White House role to potential Chinese investors and showing a video in which President Trump appeared at events in China. Xi Jinping is learning to pick even the pieces. National Security Adviser Michael Flynn and Kushner. This trek in Conflicts: Lawsuit trigger Trump Org. Made that news reports and by President Trump's former lawyer.
    [Show full text]
  • House Admin Hearing 6-11-21
    WRITTEN STATEMENT OF ASHLEE N. TITUS PARTNER, BELL, MCANDREWS & HILTACHK, LLP SECRETARY AND BOARD MEMBER, LAWYERS DEMOCRACY FUND VOTING IN AMERICA: THE POTENTIAL FOR POLLING PLACE QUALITY AND RESTRICTIONS ON OPPORTUNITIES TO VOTE TO INTERFERE WITH FREE AND FAIR ACCESS TO THE BALLOT THE COMMITTEE ON HOUSE ADMINISTRATION U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES JUNE 11, 2021 Thank you, Chairperson Butterfield, Ranking Member Steil, and members of the Committee for allowing me to speak before you today. The conversation before the Committee today is vitally important. Free and fair access to the ballot is essential to a functioning and enduring democracy. Free and fair access ensures that all eligible voters can vote and be confident that their votes count. It means that citizens recognize the election as free and fair and therefore accept the results of an election no matter which candidate wins. Safeguards that protect the freedom and fairness of the entire election process give the American people that confidence in the election results. I am excited to address the Committee today on these important issues. My name is Ashlee Titus. I am an attorney at Bell, McAndrews, & Hiltachk in Sacramento, California specializing in campaign finance and election law. As part of my election law practice, I organize lawyers to observe elections in California and have been an observer myself in several California counties over the last 17 years. I also serve as the Secretary and on the Board of Directors for Lawyers Democracy Fund, a non- profit, nonpartisan organization dedicated to promoting the role of ethics and legal professionalism in the electoral process.
    [Show full text]
  • Follow the Money: Did Administration Officials' Financial Entanglements with China Delay Trump's Promised Tough-On-China
    MARCH 2018 FOLLOW THE MONEY Did Administration Officials’ Financial Entanglements with China Delay Trump’s Promised Tough-on-China Trade Policy? REPORT BY PUBLIC CITIZEN’S GLOBAL TRADE WATCH © 2018 PUBLIC CITIZEN. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Acknowledgements This report was researched and written by Vilas Pathikonda, Senior Research Fellow with Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch division. The report was edited by Global Trade Watch Director Lori Wallach and copyedited by Melanie Foley. Report layout and design by JaRel Clay. About Public Citizen Public Citizen is a national non-profit organization with more than 300,000 members and supporters. We represent consumer interests through lobbying, litigation, administrative advocacy, research, and public education on a broad range of issues including consumer rights in the marketplace, product safety, financial regulation, safe and affordable health care, campaign finance reform and government ethics, fair trade, climate change, and corporate and government accountability. About Global Trade Watch Global Trade Watch’s mission is to ensure that in this era of globalization, a majority have the opportunity to enjoy economic security, a clean environment, safe food, medicines and products, access to quality affordable services such as health care and the exercise of democratic decision-making in matters that affect them and their communities. Learn more at tradewatch.org. Cover Photo: TaxCredits.net and Wikimedia, adapted by Public Citizen This report has been slightly updated from its original version. (last updated June 28, 2018) TRADEWATCH.ORG Introduction Washington insiders and pundits are obsessed Even Trump’s bellicose China trade rhetoric with an “ideological” battle over trade in the from the campaign was replaced by an White House.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2019 Remarks Prior to a Meeting
    Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2019 Remarks Prior to a Meeting With Senior Military Leaders and an Exchange With Reporters April 3, 2019 The President. Well, thank you very much. It's a great honor to be with our military leaders. These are tremendous folks. We've had a tremendous year. We've been on the cusp of doing something, and we are on the cusp of doing something very important. We're rebuilding our military like probably never before. Seven hundred billion dollars approved my first year, seven hundred and sixteen my second year. And I don't know even if these great generals and admirals know, but we're asking for $750 billion. And tremendous progress has been made. You know also about 100 percent of the caliphate in Syria that's taken place as of a few days ago. And these are incredible warriors, incredible fighters, and it's my really tremendous honor to be with you all. And we're going over—after this, we're going to go have a quick dinner over at the White House. But we've been doing this once a year. We meet more often than that, but we've been doing the dinners once a year. We talk about a lot of different things, and a lot of good ideas comes out. And it's great to be with you all. And I want to thank the media. You've been extremely gracious over the last 2 days. The rest of the term, I would say not as good, but that's okay.
    [Show full text]
  • Most of Trump's Charts Skew the Data. A...Always in His Favor
    Skip The Fix (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/) (https://twitter.com(h/ttrpesa:l/D/otwniatltdeTr.rcuomm(hp/t/trpsetsaa:l/tDu/otswn/i7at5ltde5Tr1.rcu7o6mm(3hp/t6/tr8pse7tsaa:8l/tD3u/ot1swn8/i7at5lt9de76Tr69.rcu8)om8m(h3p/t3/trp1set5saa:9l/tD7u/ot6swn/6i7a8t5lt3de7T5r6.r3cu5o)m0m(h9p/t0/trps4etsa8a:l9/tDu/6ows1n/w37a9w5ld2.7iT6n6r4su1t)8ma(0hgpt4r/ta8psm6tsa:6./ct4u/ows8m/2w7/9wp59./8f5Ba02Ic0Ve)4Nb18o5_o4uk4D.c1Xo7xm50/5/D)3o4n0a9ld) Trump/photos/a.488852220724.393301.153080620724/10157375935840725/? type=3&theater) (https://twitter.com(h/ttrpesa:l/D/otwniatltdeTr.rcuomm(hp/t/trpsetsaa:l/tDu/otswn/i7at5ltde8Tr3.rcu5om0m(h4p/t7/trp0sets4aa:l0/tDu/2ots4wn/0i7at86ltde40Tr42.rcu91om3)m(h6p/t2/trp8sets9aa:2l/tDu/6ots7wn/7i7a9t6ltd3e8T9r5.r2cu7o)m8m(h4p/t7/tr8pse2tsaa:6l/tD6u/ot4swn/5i7at86ltd1e91Tr3.3rcu3)om1m(h8p/t4/trp1se3tsaa:1l/tD6u/o6wsn/8w7a7w6l8d.97fTa3rcu3)em1b8po4/o1sk3t.ac1to6um6s/8/7D768o97n3a3)ld1T8r4u1m3p1/6p6h8o7t8o7s/3a).488852220724.393301.153080620724/10157616391995725/? type=3&theater) (https://twitter.com/realD(o) naldTrum(hpt/tpstsa:/tu/tsw/i7t7te3r9.c7o2m(h3/t0trp5es6a:4l/D/2ow9nw1a3wld7.fT9ar2cu)em(bhpot/topskts.ac:/tou/mws//w7Dw7o.6inn0as5ltd8a(Th5grtr3utapm8ms1p:.3/c/7/op4wmh5wo/2twpo5./si4Bn/8sKa)t.Va4(thg8ytr78tapz8mDs5:.9/2c/Mo2tmw20i/t)p7te2/rB4.cK.3oVm9tv3/P3Toe0jat1Xm.1c5T/r)3u0m8p0/6s2ta0t7u2s4/7/1706185775609534493306933107972553/) ? type=3&theater) (https://twitter.com(h/ttTpesa:/m/Twrwuwm.pfa/cseta(bhtotutospk/s.7c:/7o/6mt8w/6iDt6toe5nr2.ac0lod0mT3r/0uTm9e3ap7m/0pT8hr8ou)tmosp//as.t4a8tu8s8/57277252400723463.369730310515.215713)080620724/10157707883725725/?
    [Show full text]