DOCSLIB.ORG

Morning Consult Respondent Demographics Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Morning Consult Respondent Demographics Summary National Tracking Poll Project: 2103166 N Size: 2043 Registered Voters Margin of Error: ± 2% Topline Report March 26-29, 2021 Question Response Frequency Percentage P1 Now, generally speaking, would you say that things in the country are going in the right direction, or have they pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track? Right Direction 1031 50% Wrong Track 1012 50% nr2b Do you approve or disapprove of the job Joe Biden is doing as President? Strongly Approve 681 33% Somewhat Approve 494 24% Somewhat Disapprove 213 10% Strongly Disapprove 581 28% Don’t Know / No Opinion 74 4% nr2bNET Do you approve or disapprove of the job Joe Biden is doing as President? Total Approve 1175 58% Total Disapprove 794 39% Don’t Know / No Opinion 74 4% P3 Now, thinking about your vote, what would you say is the top set of issues on your mind when you cast your vote for federal offices such as U.S. Senate or Congress? Economic Issues – like taxes, wages, jobs, 718 35% unemployment, and spending Security Issues – like terrorism, foreign policy, and 307 15% border security Health Care Issues – like the 2010 health care law, 326 16% Medicaid, other challenges Seniors Issues – like Medicare and Social Security 290 14% Women’s Issues – like birth control, abortion, and equal 102 5% pay Education Issues – like school standards, class sizes, 84 4% school choice, and student loans Energy Issues – like carbon emissions, cost of 83 4% electricity/gasoline, or renewables Other: 133 7% Page | 1 Question Response Frequency Percentage POL1_1 Do you approve or disapprove of how President Biden is handling each of the following? The economy Strongly approve 528 26% Somewhat approve 536 26% Somewhat disapprove 227 11% Strongly disapprove 578 28% Don’t Know / No Opinion 174 8% POL1_2 Do you approve or disapprove of how President Biden is handling each of the following? Jobs Strongly approve 510 25% Somewhat approve 497 24% Somewhat disapprove 224 11% Strongly disapprove 548 27% Don’t Know / No Opinion 265 13% POL1_3 Do you approve or disapprove of how President Biden is handling each of the following? Health care Strongly approve 557 27% Somewhat approve 509 25% Somewhat disapprove 211 10% Strongly disapprove 493 24% Don’t Know / No Opinion 273 13% POL1_4 Do you approve or disapprove of how President Biden is handling each of the following? Immigration Strongly approve 345 17% Somewhat approve 469 23% Somewhat disapprove 254 12% Strongly disapprove 759 37% Don’t Know / No Opinion 217 11% POL1_5 Do you approve or disapprove of how President Biden is handling each of the following? Climate change Strongly approve 537 26% Somewhat approve 496 24% Somewhat disapprove 181 9% Strongly disapprove 488 24% Don’t Know / No Opinion 340 17% Page | 2 Question Response Frequency Percentage POL1_6 Do you approve or disapprove of how President Biden is handling each of the following? The environment Strongly approve 524 26% Somewhat approve 540 26% Somewhat disapprove 194 10% Strongly disapprove 469 23% Don’t Know / No Opinion 315 15% POL1_7 Do you approve or disapprove of how President Biden is handling each of the following? Energy Strongly approve 481 24% Somewhat approve 499 24% Somewhat disapprove 174 9% Strongly disapprove 549 27% Don’t Know / No Opinion 340 17% POL1_8 Do you approve or disapprove of how President Biden is handling each of the following? Education Strongly approve 511 25% Somewhat approve 516 25% Somewhat disapprove 219 11% Strongly disapprove 471 23% Don’t Know / No Opinion 326 16% POL1_9 Do you approve or disapprove of how President Biden is handling each of the following? National security Strongly approve 494 24% Somewhat approve 486 24% Somewhat disapprove 197 10% Strongly disapprove 577 28% Don’t Know / No Opinion 289 14% POL1_10 Do you approve or disapprove of how President Biden is handling each of the following? Gun policy Strongly approve 436 21% Somewhat approve 441 22% Somewhat disapprove 248 12% Strongly disapprove 638 31% Don’t Know / No Opinion 280 14% Page | 3 Question Response Frequency Percentage POL1_11 Do you approve or disapprove of how President Biden is handling each of the following? Protecting Medicare and Social Security Strongly approve 545 27% Somewhat approve 469 23% Somewhat disapprove 178 9% Strongly disapprove 442 22% Don’t Know / No Opinion 408 20% POL1_12 Do you approve or disapprove of how President Biden is handling each of the following? Coronavirus Strongly approve 779 38% Somewhat approve 524 26% Somewhat disapprove 201 10% Strongly disapprove 403 20% Don’t Know / No Opinion 137 7% POL1_13 Do you approve or disapprove of how President Biden is handling each of the following? Voting rights Strongly approve 590 29% Somewhat approve 445 22% Somewhat disapprove 170 8% Strongly disapprove 531 26% Don’t Know / No Opinion 307 15% POL1_14 Do you approve or disapprove of how President Biden is handling each of the following? Foreign policy Strongly approve 424 21% Somewhat approve 484 24% Somewhat disapprove 209 10% Strongly disapprove 577 28% Don’t Know / No Opinion 349 17% POL2_1 How would you rate each of the following on their handling of the coronavirus? President Joe Biden Excellent 653 32% Good 481 24% Just Fair 289 14% Poor 533 26% Don’t Know / No Opinion 87 4% Page | 4 Question Response Frequency Percentage POL2_2 How would you rate each of the following on their handling of the coronavirus? Congress Excellent 153 7% Good 435 21% Just Fair 714 35% Poor 565 28% Don’t Know / No Opinion 176 9% POL2_3 How would you rate each of the following on their handling of the coronavirus? Congressional Democrats Excellent 337 16% Good 561 27% Just Fair 419 20% Poor 554 27% Don’t Know / No Opinion 173 8% POL2_4 How would you rate each of the following on their handling of the coronavirus? Congressional Republicans Excellent 146 7% Good 362 18% Just Fair 525 26% Poor 817 40% Don’t Know / No Opinion 193 9% POL2_5 How would you rate each of the following on their handling of the coronavirus? The World Health Organization (WHO) Excellent 378 18% Good 621 30% Just Fair 397 19% Poor 461 23% Don’t Know / No Opinion 186 9% POL2_6 How would you rate each of the following on their handling of the coronavirus? The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Excellent 492 24% Good 700 34% Just Fair 442 22% Poor 288 14% Don’t Know / No Opinion 122 6% Page | 5 Question Response Frequency Percentage POL2_7 How would you rate each of the following on their handling of the coronavirus? Your state’s governor Excellent 383 19% Good 587 29% Just Fair 393 19% Poor 561 27% Don’t Know / No Opinion 119 6% POL2_8 How would you rate each of the following on their handling of the coronavirus? Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Excellent 683 33% Good 496 24% Just Fair 309 15% Poor 399 20% Don’t Know / No Opinion 156 8% POL3 Generally speaking, would you say you are more concerned about... The economic impact of coronavirus including the 746 37% effect on the stock market and increased unemployment The public health impact of coronavirus including the 1118 55% spread of the disease which would cause more deaths Don’t know / No opinion 180 9% POL4 Currently, do you believe it’s more important for the government to address the: The spread of coronavirus 1137 56% The economy 781 38% Don’t know / No opinion 125 6% POL5 Even if neither is exactly correct, which of the following comes closest to your opinion? Americans should continue to social distance for as 1408 69% long as is needed to curb the spread of coronavirus even if it means continued damage to the economy Americans should stop social distancing to stimulate 435 21% the economy even if it means increasing the spread of coronavirus Don’t know / No opinion 200 10% POL6 Which of the following is closest to your opinion, even if neither is exactly right? The current situation at the U.S. - Mexico border isthe 557 27% result of a seasonal uptick in migration ahead of deadly summer heat. The current situation at the U.S. - Mexico border isthe 1090 53% result of the Biden administration changing Trump-era migration policies. Don’t know / No opinion 397 19% Page | 6 Question Response Frequency Percentage POL7 As you may know, the Biden administration is putting together a $3 trillion infrastructure plan to address a variety of priorities. This plan is expected to include tax increases for those making more than $400,000, as well as increases to the corporate tax rate in order to balance spending. Which of the following comes closest to your opinion? I support making improvements to America’s 1112 54% infrastructure funded by tax increases for those making more than $400,000, as well as increases to the corporate tax rate, to make these improvements happen I support making improvements to America’s 553 27% infrastructure, but only if these improvements can be funded without tax increases for those making more than $400k and increases to the corporate tax rate I do not support making improvements to America’s 119 6% infrastructure Don’t know/ no opinion 260 13% POL8_1 If the $3 trillion infrastructure plan the Biden administration is putting together was funded by the following, would you be more or less likely to support the plan, or would the way in which it was funded have no impact on your support? Funded by tax increases for those making more than $400,000 More likely to support 1155 57% No impact 533 26% Less likely to support 355 17% POL8_2 If the $3 trillion infrastructure plan the Biden administration is putting together was funded by
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1605026 NY Spotlight Memo
    ! MEMORANDUM TO: Interested Parties FROM: Alixandria Lapp, Executive Director, House Majority PAC DATE: May 26, 2016 RE: Congressional Democrats Poised for Pick-Ups Across the Empire State With just over a month until New York’s June 28 congressional primaries, and just under six months from the November general election, Democrats are poised for significant pick-ups in congressional districts across the Empire State. This year Democrats are overwhelmingly on offense in New York – with at least six Republican held seats that could be flipped this November. Multiple Republican incumbents and challengers are finding their already-precarious political prospects diminishing even further as they struggle with a damaging party brand, a toxic presidential ticket-mate, and increasingly prove themselves out of touch with their own districts. Bottom line: With New York’s congressional Republicans increasingly vulnerable heading into the fall, Democrats are overwhelmingly on offense and well-positioned to win key districts across the state in 2016. New York Republicans Tied to Toxic Brand As in any presidential year, down-ballot races will be heavily shaped by the top of the ticket. For Republicans, particularly in New York, that’s bad news. Even before the GOP presidential race took shape, New York’s congressional Republicans faced significant structural political challenges. In six competitive Republican-held districts, President Obama either won or came within 1% of winning in 2008 and 2012. Now with Donald Trump as their presidential ticket-mate, down-ballot prospects for New York Republicans are far worse. Earlier this month, a poll by Morning Consult found that nearly half of all Americans would “be less likely to support candidates for public office if they say they back Donald Trump.” And despite Donald Trump’s big win in New York’s presidential primary, there’s no indication that it will translate to success in November.
    [Show full text]
  • AMERICAN P VERSIGHT
    AMERICAN p VERSIGHT January11,2021 VIA ONLINE PORTAL DouglasHibbard Chief,InitialRequestStaff OfficeofInform ationPolicy DepartmentofJustice 441GStNW,6thFloor Washington,DC20530 ViaOnlinePortal Re: Expedited Freedom of Information Act Request DearFOIAOfficer: PursuanttotheFreedomof InformationAct(FOIA),5U.S.C.§552,andthe implem entingregulationsof youragency,Am ericanOversightmakesthefollowing requestforrecords. OnJanuary6,2021,PresidentTrumpinciteda mtoob attackCongresswhile mbers em werecertifyingtheelectionforPresident-electJoeBiden. 1 Theapparent insurrectionistsattackedtheCapitolBuilding,forcedtheirwaypastreportedly understaffedCapitolPolice,andultim atelydelayedtheCongressionalsessionbyforcing lawmakersandtheirstaffstoflee. 2 Fourpeoplediedduringthisassaultandafifth person,aCapitolPoliceofficer,diedthefollowingdayfrominjuriesincurredwhile engagingwithrioters. 3 Whilem ilitia mbers em roamedthehallsofCongress,Trum preportedlyfoughtagainst deployingtheD.C.NationalGuard, 4 andtheDefenseDepartm entreportedlyinitially 1 PressRelease,OfficeofSen.MittRom ney,Rom neyCondemInsurrectionatU.S. ns Capitol, Jan.6,2021, https://www.romney.senate.gov/rom ney-condem ns-insurrection- us-capitol. 2 RebeccaTan,etal., TrumpSupportersStormU.S.Capitol,WithOneWomanKilledand TearGasFired, Wash.Post(Jan.7,2021,12:30AM), https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/trum p-supporters-storm -capitol- dc/2021/01/06/58afc0b8-504b-11eb-83e3-322644d82356 story.html. 3 EricLevenson, WhatWeKnowAboutthe5DeathsinthePro-TrumpMobthatStormedthe Capitol, CNN(Jan.8,2021,5:29PM),
    [Show full text]
  • Trump Holds up Ukraine Military Aid Meant to Confront Russia POLITICO
    12/14/19, 1052 PM Page 1 of 1 Pro-Russia separatist soldiers celebrate in Lugansk, Ukraine, in 2014. | Spencer Platt/Getty Images BUDGET & APPROPRIATIONS Trump holds up Ukraine military aid meant to confront Russia By CAITLIN EMMA and CONNOR O’BRIEN | 08/28/2019 06:11 PM EDT | Updated 08/29/2019 03:40 PM EDT The Trump administration is slow-walking $250 million in military assistance to Ukraine, annoying lawmakers and advocates who argue the funding is critical to keeping Russia at bay. President Donald Trump asked his national security team to review the funding program, known as the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative, in order to ensure the money is being used in the best interest of the United States, a senior administration official told POLITICO on Wednesday. Story Continued Below AD But the delays come amid questions over Trump’s approach to Russia, after a weekend in which the president repeatedly seemed to downplay Moscow’s military intervention in Ukraine and pushed for Russia to be reinstated into the Group of Seven, an annual gathering of the world’s largest advanced economies. The review is also occurring amid a broader internal debate over whether to halt or cut billions of dollars in foreign aid. United States military aid to Ukraine has long been seen as a litmus test for how strongly the American government is pushing back against Moscow. The Trump administration in 2017 approved lethal arms sales to Ukraine, taking a step the Obama administration had never done. The move was seen as a sign that Trump’s government was taking a hard-line approach to a revanchist Vladimir Putin despite the president’s public rhetoric flattering the Russian leader.
    [Show full text]
  • The Senate in Transition Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Nuclear Option1
    \\jciprod01\productn\N\NYL\19-4\NYL402.txt unknown Seq: 1 3-JAN-17 6:55 THE SENATE IN TRANSITION OR HOW I LEARNED TO STOP WORRYING AND LOVE THE NUCLEAR OPTION1 William G. Dauster* The right of United States Senators to debate without limit—and thus to filibuster—has characterized much of the Senate’s history. The Reid Pre- cedent, Majority Leader Harry Reid’s November 21, 2013, change to a sim- ple majority to confirm nominations—sometimes called the “nuclear option”—dramatically altered that right. This article considers the Senate’s right to debate, Senators’ increasing abuse of the filibuster, how Senator Reid executed his change, and possible expansions of the Reid Precedent. INTRODUCTION .............................................. 632 R I. THE NATURE OF THE SENATE ........................ 633 R II. THE FOUNDERS’ SENATE ............................. 637 R III. THE CLOTURE RULE ................................. 639 R IV. FILIBUSTER ABUSE .................................. 641 R V. THE REID PRECEDENT ............................... 645 R VI. CHANGING PROCEDURE THROUGH PRECEDENT ......... 649 R VII. THE CONSTITUTIONAL OPTION ........................ 656 R VIII. POSSIBLE REACTIONS TO THE REID PRECEDENT ........ 658 R A. Republican Reaction ............................ 659 R B. Legislation ...................................... 661 R C. Supreme Court Nominations ..................... 670 R D. Discharging Committees of Nominations ......... 672 R E. Overruling Home-State Senators ................. 674 R F. Overruling the Minority Leader .................. 677 R G. Time To Debate ................................ 680 R CONCLUSION................................................ 680 R * Former Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy for U.S. Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid. The author has worked on U.S. Senate and White House staffs since 1986, including as Staff Director or Deputy Staff Director for the Committees on the Budget, Labor and Human Resources, and Finance.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Resolution
    CONFERENCE RESOLUTION Resolved, that the following shall be the rules of the House Republican Conference for the 115th Congress: Rule 1—Conference Membership (a) Inclusion.—All Republican Members of the House of Representatives (including Delegates and the Resident Commissioner) and other Members of the House as determined by the Republican Conference of the House of Representatives (“the Conference”) shall be Members of the Conference. (b) Expulsion.—A ⅔ vote of the entire membership shall be necessary to expel a Member of the Conference. Proceedings for expulsion shall follow the rules of the House of Representatives, as nearly as practicable. Rule 2—Republican Leadership (a) Elected Leadership.—The Elected Republican Leaders of the House of Representatives are— (1) the Speaker; (2) the Republican Leader; (3) the Republican Whip; (4) the Chair of the Republican Conference; (5) the Chair of the National Republican Congressional Committee; (6) the Chair of the Committee on Policy; (7) the Vice-Chair of the Republican Conference; and, (8) the Secretary of the Republican Conference. (b) Designated Leadership.—The designated Republican Leaders of the House of Representatives are— (1) the Chair of the House Committee on Rules; (2) the Chair of the House Committee on Ways and Means; (3) the Chair of the House Committee on Appropriations; (4) the Chair of the House Committee on the Budget; (5) the Chair of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce; (6) the Chief Deputy Whip; (7) one member of the sophomore class elected by the sophomore class; and, (8) one member of the freshman class elected by the freshman class. (c) Leadership Issues.—The Republican Leader may designate certain issues as “Leadership Issues.” Those issues will require early and ongoing cooperation between the relevant committees and the Leadership as those issues evolve.
    [Show full text]
  • National Tracking Poll 200771
    National Tracking Poll #200771 July 17-19, 2020 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted between July 17-July 19, 2020 among a national sample of 2200 Adults. The interviews were conducted online and the data were weighted to approximate a target sample of Adults based on age, gender, educational attainment, race, and region. Results from the full survey have a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points. Table Index 1 Table THS1: Generally speaking, how secure would you say your private messages are on social media sites? ........................................ 4 2 Table THS2: And how concerned would you say you are, if at all, about your private, direct messages on social media sites being hacked? .......................... 8 3 Table THS3: How much have you seen, read or heard about the recent Twitter hack where the accounts of Joe Biden, Elon Musk, Kayne West, Barack Obama, Bill Gates and many public figures were hijacked and hackers tweeted from those accounts to request people send Bitcoin to various addresses? ...................................... 12 4 Table THS4_1: Given the recent Twitter hack, how much do you trust social media companies to keep the following personal information safe and secure? Your full name . 16 5 Table THS4_2: Given the recent Twitter hack, how much do you trust social media companies to keep the following personal information safe and secure? Email address . 20 6 Table THS4_3: Given the recent Twitter hack, how much do you trust social media companies to keep the following personal information safe and secure? Birth date . 24 7 Table THS4_4: Given the recent Twitter hack, how much do you trust social media companies to keep the following personal information safe and secure? Banking information .
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Version of the Newsletter
    Monthly Legislative Newsletter June 2021 President Biden’s 2021 Budget On May 28, 2021, President Biden released his Fiscal Year 2022 Budget. The budget, which is largely a messaging document, included a number of investments related to public health. Additionally, the foundations of the President’s budget are both the American Jobs Plan and the American Families Plan, which are both pieces of legislation that President Biden introduced in order to get America back on track as the tide turns on the pandemic. President Biden’s budget includes: • Extending the expanded health insurance tax credits that were included in the American Rescue Plan o These credits lower premiums by an average of $50 per person and making them permanent will allow upwards of 4 million uninsured people to get coverage • $131.7 billion for HHS o $25 billion increase from Fiscal Year 2021 • A total of $51 billion for NIH o $9 billion increase from Fiscal Year 2021 • Launches the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H) o The budget provides $6.5 billion to launch ARPA-H o Will initially focus on research and development spending on cancer and other diseases such as diabetes and Alzheimer’s o Goal would be to speed up health breakthroughs • $7.6 billion for NCI o Includes $50 million for the Childhood Cancer Data Initiative as well as Cancer Moonshot funding • $8.7 billion in discretionary funding for CDC in order to better prepare for the next pandemic You can view the full fact sheet HERE. What Does the Biden Budget Mean for Congress? While the President’s budget is largely a messaging document, its release officially kicks the congressional appropriations process into high gear.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of One-Party Rule in the Senate Charles Tiefer University of Baltimore School of Law
    Roger Williams University Law Review Volume 24 | Issue 1 Article 3 Winter 2019 Deliberation's Demise: The Rise of One-Party Rule in the Senate Charles Tiefer University of Baltimore School of Law Kathleen Clark Washington University in St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.rwu.edu/rwu_LR Part of the American Politics Commons, and the Legislation Commons Recommended Citation Tiefer, Charles and Clark, Kathleen (2019) "Deliberation's Demise: The Rise of One-Party Rule in the Senate," Roger Williams University Law Review: Vol. 24 : Iss. 1 , Article 3. Available at: https://docs.rwu.edu/rwu_LR/vol24/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DOCS@RWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Roger Williams University Law Review by an authorized editor of DOCS@RWU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Deliberation’s Demise: The Rise of One-Party Rule in the Senate Charles Tiefer* and Kathleen Clark** ABSTRACT Much of the recent legal scholarship on the Senate expresses concern about gridlock, which was caused in part by the Senate’s supermajority requirement to pass legislation and confirm presidential nominees. This scholarship exalted the value of procedural changes permitting the majority party to push through legislation and confirmations, and failed to appreciate salutary aspects of the supermajority requirement: that it provided a key structural support for stability and balance in governance. The Senate changed its rules in order to address the problem of partisan gridlock, and now a party with a bare majority is able to force through much of its agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Are President Trump's Allies in the House of Representatives?
    The Forum 2017; 15(3): 415–429 Andrew J. Clarke* and Jeffery A. Jenkins* Who are President Trump’s Allies in the House of Representatives? https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2017-0029 Abstract: We conduct a preliminary analysis of the first 200 days of the Donald Trump presidency, to determine who his principal allies in the US House have been. We build our analysis around three groups of Republicans, based on caucus affiliations: members of the Republican Main Street Partnership (RMSP), the Republican Study Committee (RSC), and the House Freedom Caucus (HFC). We find that House Republicans, regardless off caucus membership, broadly support President Trump and largely shared in the his electoral success. Yet, we also uncover suggestive evidence that the HFC is maneuvering into a position of influ- ence with President Trump. Freedom Caucus members are more closely tied to his electoral performance than members of other conservative groups, and they appear to receive more time with the President relative to a comparable group of House Republicans. While these results are interesting, they are also initial and more time is needed to assess how President Trump builds a winning coalition with Republican House members. Introduction We are now over 200 days into the Donald Trump presidency, and Republicans are struggling to make good on their most salient campaign promises. Despite unified control of the federal government, the GOP has not been able to pass any pieces of legislation from the President’s “Contract with the American Voter.”1 Why? Political observers frequently offer a pair of related explanations.
    [Show full text]
  • Plea Agreement
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA No. 15 CR 315 v. Judge Thomas M. Durkin JOHN DENNIS HASTERT PLEA AGREEMENT 1. This Plea Agreement between the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, ZACHARY T. FARDON, and defendant JOHN DENNIS HASTERT, and his attorneys, THOMAS C. GREEN and JOHN N. GALLO, is made pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The parties to this Agreement have agreed upon the following: Charges in This Case 2. The indictment in this case charges defendant with knowingly and willfully making materially false statements and representations in a matter within the jurisdiction of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001(a)(2) (Count 1), and knowingly structuring currency transactions to evade reporting requirements, in violation of Title 31, United States Code, Section 5324(a)(3) (Count 2). 3. Defendant has read the charges against him contained in the indictment, and those charges have been fully explained to him by his attorneys. 4. Defendant fully understands the nature and elements of the crimes with which he has been charged. Charge to Which Defendant Is Pleading Guilty 5. By this Plea Agreement, defendant agrees to enter a voluntary plea of guilty to Count 2 of the indictment. Count 2 charges defendant with knowingly and for the purpose of evading the reporting requirements of Title 31, United States Code, Section 5313(a) and regulations prescribed thereunder, structuring and assisting in structuring currency transactions, in violation of Title 31, United States Code, Section 5324(a)(3).
    [Show full text]
  • Budget of the U.S. Government
    FISCAL YEAR 2019 EFFICIENT, EFFECTIVE, ACCOUNTABLE AN AMERICAN BUDGET BUDGET OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET | OMB.GOV THE BUDGET DOCUMENTS Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year Information is also provided on certain activities whose transac- 2019 contains the Budget Message of the President, information tions are not part of the budget totals. on the President’s priorities, and summary tables. ELECTRONIC SOURCES OF BUDGET INFORMATION Analytical Perspectives, Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2019 contains analyses that are The information contained in these documents is available in designed to highlight specified subject areas or provide other electronic format from the following sources: significant presentations of budget data that place the budget Internet. All budget documents, including documents that in perspective. This volume includes economic and accounting are released at a future date, spreadsheets of many of the bud- analyses; information on Federal receipts and collections; anal- get tables, and a public use budget database are available for yses of Federal spending; information on Federal borrowing and downloading in several formats from the internet at www.white- debt; baseline or current services estimates; and other technical house.gov/omb/budget/. Links to documents and materials presentations. from budgets of prior years are also provided. The Analytical Perspectives volume also has supplemental Budget CD-ROM. The CD-ROM contains all of the printed materials that are available on the internet at www.whitehouse. budget documents in fully indexed PDF format along with the gov/omb/analytical-perspectives/ and on the Budget CD-ROM.
    [Show full text]
  • Widgets Weekly: the Art of Covering Congressional Minutiae
    Widgets Weekly: The Art of Covering Congressional Minutiae To compile this chart of trade press organizations, The Politico reviewed the lists of all credentialed print media that covered the 109th Congress. The lists are compiled by the House and Senate press galleries. (The list for the current Congress will not be available for several months.) For the purposes of this list, we defined the trade press narrowly, excluding congressional newspapers such as The Hill and Roll Call. (We also would have excluded ourselves, but The Politico began publishing during this session of Congress.) We also excluded most of the financial press unless the publication was tailored to bond traders or another very specific sector. Finally, we included what's referred to as the newsletter press, such as BNA. Please let us know in the comments section - or write directly to us mailto: [email protected] - if we excluded one that should be included or included one we should have left out. Source: Congressional Press Galleries Credentialed Trade Publications National Journal’s Technology Daily IDG News Service Telecommunications Reports Institutional Investor American Banker Internewsletter Atlantic Information Services Interpreter Releases Penton Media Inc. Liability & Insurance Week Food Chemical News Linn's Stamp News Research Institute of America Group LP/Gas Washington Technology Mail on Sunday Bond Buyer Mass Transit Lawyer CQ Researcher Medical Devices Report IMAS Publishing Multichannel News Inside Mortgage Finance National Law Journal Inside Washington Publishers Natural Gas Week McGraw-Hill Co. Oberle Communications Army Times Publishing Co. Oil & Gas Journal Energy Daily Pesticide Report Federal Employees News Digest Pharmaceutical Executive Government Contractor PR Week Human Events Public Lands News Natural Gas Intelligence Radio & Records U.
    [Show full text]