Environmental and Social Impact Assessment for the Eurasia Tunnel Project Istanbul

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental and Social Impact Assessment for the Eurasia Tunnel Project Istanbul Environmental and Social Impact Assessment for the Eurasia Tunnel Project Istanbul, Volume II Main Report Final Draft January 2011 ERM Group, Germany and UK ELC-Group, Istanbul Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world Main ESIA Report DRAFT REPORT Avrasya Tüneli İşletme İnşaat ve Yatırım A.Ş. (ATAŞ - the Eurasia Tunnel Operation, Construction and Investment Inc. Co.) Eurasia Tunnel Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Volume II Main Report January 2011 For and on behalf of Environmental Resources Management Approved by: _________________ Karen Raymond Signed: Position: ______________________Principal Partner Date: _________________________ 28st January 2011 This report is confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known. Any such party relies on the report at their own risk. This report has been prepared by Environmental Resources Management the trading name of Environmental Resources Management Limited, with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the client, incorporating our General Terms and Conditions of Business and taking account of the resources devoted to it by agreement with the client. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the above. ERM GmbH ELC Group Ltd. Siemensstrasse 9 Kavacık Mah. Şehit Mustafa D-63263 Neu-Isenburg Yazıcı Sok. No:20 Tel.: +49 (0) 61 02/206-0 KAVACIK/ ISTANBUL Fax.: +49 (0) 61 02/206-202 (+9)0 216 465 91 30 (pbx) E-Mail: [email protected] (+9)0 216 465 91 39 (fax) http://www.erm.com E-Mail: [email protected] http://www.elcgroup.com.tr/ Project No. P0106067 Main ESIA Report ERM GmbH Environmental Resources Management CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 THE EURASIA TUNNEL PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 1-1 1.2 THE REQUIREMENT FOR ESIA 1-2 1.3 APPROACH TO THE ASSESSMENT 1-4 1.3.1 Overview and Programme 1-4 1.3.2 Screening 1-6 1.3.3 Scoping 1-7 1.3.4 Baseline Studies 1-10 1.3.5 Assessment of Impacts 1-11 1.3.6 Dealing with Uncertainty 1-17 1.3.7 Eurasia Tunnel Environmental and Social Management Plan 1-18 1.3.8 Interface with Project Planning and Design 1-19 1.3.9 Stakeholder Engagement 1-20 1.4 NEXT STEPS 1-21 1.5 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT 1-23 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2-1 2.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW 2-1 2.1.1 The Project Proponent 2-1 2.1.2 Need for the Project 2-2 2.1.3 Overview of the Scheme 2-3 2.1.4 Implementation Programme 2-4 2.2 BACKGROUND TO THE DEVELOPMENT AND ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROJECT 2-4 2.2.1 Route Selection 2-4 2.2.2 Outline Design Development 2-5 2.2.3 Design and Construction Alternatives 2-5 2.3 PROJECT DESIGN 2-7 2.3.1 Part 1: Kazliçesme to the Bosphorus 2-8 2.3.2 The Toll Plaza 2-14 2.3.3 Operations Building 2-15 2.3.4 Part 2: The Tunnel 2-15 2.3.5 Part 3: Haydarpaşa to Göztepe 2-19 2.3.6 Tunnel Ventilation 2-21 2.3.7 Electricity Supply 2-23 2.3.8 Drainage 2-24 PROJECT NO. P0106067, ATAS JANUARY 2011 EURASIA TUNNEL, ISTANBUL, TURKEY 0-I FINAL DRAFT ERM GmbH Environmental Resources Management 2.3.9 Traffic Management Systems 2-24 2.3.10 Design Codes and Standards 2-24 2.4 CONSTRUCTION PROPOSALS 2-28 2.4.1 Indicative Construction Schedule and Working Hours 2-28 2.4.2 Tunnel Construction 2-29 2.4.3 Approach Road Construction 2-32 2.4.4 Construction Materials 2-34 2.4.5 Spoil Re-use and Disposal 2-35 2.4.6 Site drainage arrangements 2-36 2.4.7 Temporary Construction Areas 2-37 2.4.8 Construction Workforce 2-38 2.4.9 Traffic and Access Management 2-38 2.5 OPERATION 2-39 2.5.1 Management Team 2-39 2.5.2 Traffic Projections 2-40 2.5.3 Toll Collection 2-41 2.5.4 Emergency Planning 2-41 2.5.5 Maintenance 2-46 2.5.6 Operational Employment 2-46 3 ESIA SCOPE 3-1 3.1 INTRODUCTION 3-1 3.2 APPROACH TO SCOPING 3-1 3.3 SCOPING FINDINGS 3-3 3.4 STRUCTURE OF THE ASSESSMENT FINDINGS 3-8 4 LAND USE AND PROPERTY 4-1 4.1 INTRODUCTION 4-1 4.1.1 Scope 4-1 4.1.2 Approach 4-1 4.2 BASELINE 4-2 4.2.1 European Side 4-2 4.2.2 Asian Side 4-8 4.2.3 Future Development along the Project Alignment 4-12 4.3 PERMANENT IMPACTS ON LAND USE, PROPERTY AND PEOPLE 4-12 4.3.1 Permanent Land Take 4-12 4.3.2 Acquisition of Buildings and Impact on Residents and other Users 4-19 PROJECT NO. P0106067, ATAS JANUARY 2011 EURASIA TUNNEL, ISTANBUL, TURKEY 0-II FINAL DRAFT ERM GmbH Environmental Resources Management 4.3.3 Mitigation of Permanent Impacts on Land Use, Property and People 4-22 4.4 ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION OF IMPACTS ON ACCESS TO EXISTING LAND USES 4-26 4.5 TEMPORARY IMPACTS DURING CONSTRUCTION 4-27 5 RESOURCES AND WASTE 5-1 5.1 INTRODUCTION 5-1 5.2 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS 5-1 5.3 SPOIL DISPOSAL AND OTHER WASTE MANAGEMENT 5-2 5.4 OPERATIONAL MATERIALS AND WASTE 5-5 6 GEOLOGY, SOILS AND CONTAMINATED LAND 6-1 6.1 SCOPE 6-1 6.2 INFORMATION SOURCES AND APPROACH 6-1 6.2.1 Geology and Seismic Risk 6-1 6.2.2 Soils and Contaminated Land 6-2 6.3 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT 6-2 6.3.1 Geology 6-2 6.3.2 Seismic Risk 6-4 6.3.3 Liquefaction Risk 6-11 6.3.4 Tsunami Risk 6-12 6.3.5 Soils and Contaminated Land 6-15 6.4 ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS 6-18 6.4.1 Impacts on Geological Features and Land Stability 6-18 6.4.2 Impacts related to Geology and Seismic Risk 6-18 6.4.3 Impacts on Soils 6-18 6.4.4 Risks associated with Contaminated Land 6-19 6.5 MITIGATION MEASURES 6-20 7 THE WATER ENVIRONMENT 7-1 7.1 SCOPE 7-1 7.2 INFORMATION SOURCES AND APPROACH 7-1 7.3 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT 7-1 7.3.1 Surface Water 7-1 7.3.2 Kurbagali Creek (Kurbağalı Dere) 7-3 PROJECT NO. P0106067, ATAS JANUARY 2011 EURASIA TUNNEL, ISTANBUL, TURKEY 0-III FINAL DRAFT ERM GmbH Environmental Resources Management 7.3.3 Flood Risk 7-4 7.3.4 Groundwater 7-5 7.4 ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION OF IMPACTS DURING CONSTRUCTION 7-5 7.4.1 Introduction 7-5 7.4.2 Slurry Treatment Plant 7-6 7.4.3 Risks to Groundwater 7-6 7.4.4 Dewatering 7-7 7.4.5 Discharge of General Site Run-off 7-7 7.4.6 Stream Crossings 7-9 7.4.7 Disposal of Sewage from Construction Workforce 7-10 7.4.8 Wheel Washing 7-10 7.4.9 Accidental Spills and Other Discharges 7-10 7.4.10 Sub-Sea Grouting 7-11 7.5 ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION OF IMPACTS DURING OPERATION 7-11 8 AIR QUALITY 8-1 8.1 INTRODUCTION 8-1 8.2 METHODOLOGY AND INFORMATION SOURCES 8-3 8.2.1 Establishing the Baseline 8-3 8.2.2 Calculating Present and Future Traffic Emissions 8-3 8.2.3 Modelling the Effect of Traffic on Air Quality 8-5 8.2.4 Determining the Magnitude and Evaluating the Significance of Impact 8-6 8.2.5 Mitigation 8-11 8.3 BASELINE SITUATION IN 2009 8-11 8.3.1 Current Air Quality 8-11 8.4 EFFECTS OF EXISTING TRAFFIC ON BASELINE AIR QUALITY IN 2009-10 8-16 8.4.1 Illustrative Modelling Results for 2009 Traffic at selected Cross Sections 8-16 8.5 IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT ON LOCAL AIR QUALITY 8-19 8.5.1 Introduction 8-19 8.5.2 Traffic Flows 8-20 8.5.3 Emissions from Ventilation Shafts 8-22 8.5.4 Impacts on Local Air Quality in 2023 8-22 8.5.5 Predictions for Receptor Locations 8-29 8.6 EVALUATION OF SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACTS ON LOCAL AIR QUALITY 8-34 8.7 IMPACTS ON CITY-WIDE AIR QUALITY 8-36 8.7.1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 8-39 8.7.2 Impacts on Buildings 8-40 PROJECT NO. P0106067, ATAS JANUARY 2011 EURASIA TUNNEL, ISTANBUL, TURKEY 0-IV FINAL DRAFT ERM GmbH Environmental Resources Management 8.8 MITIGATION MEASURES FOR IMPACTS ON AIR QUALITY 8-41 8.9 AIR QUALITY IMPACTS DURING CONSTRUCTION 8-42 8.9.1 Exhaust emissions 8-44 8.9.2 Mitigation Measures during Construction 8-45 9 NOISE AND VIBRATION 9-1 9.1 INTRODUCTION 9-1 9.2 METHODOLOGY AND INFORMATION SOURCES 9-2 9.3 NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES 9-7 9.3.1 Turkish Regulations (for further details see Annex C) 9-7 9.3.2 IFC noise standards 9-7 9.3.3 Construction Noise 9-8 9.3.4 Vibration 9-9 9.4 BASELINE SITUATION 2009 9-10 9.4.1 Environmental Noise Measurements for the ESIA 9-10 9.4.2 Sound Propagation Modelling for Current Traffic 9-14 9.5 IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT ON ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE 9-19 9.6 EVALUATION OF THE PROJECT'S IMPACT ON ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE 9-22 9.6.1 Summary 9-28 9.7 MITIGATION MEASURES AND RESIDUAL IMPACTS 9-28 9.8 CONSTRUCTION PHASE 9-30 9.8.1 Noise from construction activities 9-30 9.8.2 Construction Site Noise Mitigation 9-34 9.8.3 Noise from Construction Traffic 9-36 9.8.4 Vibration 9-37 10 BIODIVERSITY AND NATURE CONSERVATION 10-1 10.1 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE 10-1 10.2 METHODOLOGY AND INFORMATION SOURCES 10-1 10.3 BASELINE 10-3 10.3.1 European side 10-3 10.3.2 Asian Side 10-7 10.3.3 Literature review 10-9 10.3.4 Designated and Protected Sites 10-10 10.3.5 Future Baseline 10-11 PROJECT NO.
Recommended publications
  • Railway Heritage of Istanbul and the Marmaray Project
    International Journal of Architectural Heritage Conservation, Analysis, and Restoration ISSN: 1558-3058 (Print) 1558-3066 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/uarc20 Railway Heritage of Istanbul and the Marmaray Project Yonca Kösebay Erkan To cite this article: Yonca Kösebay Erkan (2012) Railway Heritage of Istanbul and the Marmaray Project, International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 6:1, 86-99, DOI: 10.1080/15583058.2010.506622 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2010.506622 Published online: 03 Oct 2011. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 439 View related articles Citing articles: 3 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=uarc20 International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 6: 86–99, 2012 Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 1558-3058 print / 1558-3066 online DOI: 10.1080/15583058.2010.506622 RAILWAY HERITAGE OF ISTANBUL AND THE MARMARAY PROJECT Yonca Kösebay Erkan Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkey This study explores the significance of Istanbul’s railway heritage and discusses the criteria for evaluating the historical importance, architectural value, and social issues surrounding the city’s rail system, leading into an examination of the consequences of the Marmaray Project. The Marmaray Project is a commuter rail system designed to unify Istanbul’s two independent rail transportation systems, and it will connect Halkalı on the European side with Gebze on the Asian side of the city. With the beginnings of rail construction in the 1870s, the waters of the Bosphorus separated the Oriental Railway on the European side from the Anatolian and the Baghdad Railway, preventing a direct connection between Europe and Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Cretaceous–Eocene Geological Evolution of the Pontides Based on New Stratigraphic and Palaeontologic Data Between the Black Sea Coast and Bursa (NW Turkey)
    Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences (Turkish J. Earth Sci.), Vol.Z. ÖZCAN 21, 2012, ET pp. AL. 933–960. Copyright ©TÜBİTAK doi:10.3906/yer-1102-8 First published online 25 April 2011 Late Cretaceous–Eocene Geological Evolution of the Pontides Based on New Stratigraphic and Palaeontologic Data Between the Black Sea Coast and Bursa (NW Turkey) ZAHİDE ÖZCAN1, ARAL I. OKAY1,2, ERCAN ÖZCAN2, AYNUR HAKYEMEZ3 & SEVİNÇ ÖZKAN-ALTINER4 1 İstanbul Technical University (İTÜ), Eurasia Institute of Earth Sciences, Maslak, TR−34469 İstanbul, Turkey (E-mail: [email protected]) 2 İstanbul Technical University (İTÜ), Faculty of Mines, Department of Geology, Maslak, TR−34469 İstanbul, Turkey 3 General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration (MTA Genel Müdürlüğü), Geological Research Department, TR−06520 Ankara, Turkey 4 Middle East Technical University (METU), Department of Geological Engineering, Ünversiteler Mahallesi, Dumlupınar Bulvarı No. 1, TR−06800 Ankara, Turkey Received 17 February 2011; revised typescript receipt 04 April 2011; accepted 25 April 2011 Abstract: Th e Late Cretaceous–Eocene geological evolution of northwest Turkey between the Black Sea and Bursa was studied through detailed biostratigraphic characterization of eleven stratigraphic sections. Th e Upper Cretaceous sequence in the region starts with a major marine transgression and lies unconformably on a basement of Palaeozoic and Triassic rocks in the north (İstanbul-type basement) and on metamorphic rocks and Jurassic sedimentary rocks in the south (Sakarya-type basement). Four megasequences have been diff erentiated in the Late Cretaceous–Eocene interval. Th e fi rst one, of Turonian to Late Campanian age, is represented by volcanic and volcanoclastic rocks in the north along the Black Sea coast, and by siliciclastic turbidites and intercalated calcarenites in the south, corresponding to magmatic arc basin and fore-arc basin, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Marmaray Project - Turkey
    MARMARAY PROJECT - TURKEY Istanbul is a city where historical and cultural values must be preserved and at the same time modern railway facilities have to be installed to decrease the environmental impact of public transportation and increase the capacity, reliability and comfort of the railway systems. The Project provides an upgrading of the commuter rail system in Istanbul, connecting Halkalı on the European side to the Asian side with an uninterrupted, modern, high-capacity commuter rail system. Railway tracks in both sides of Istanbul Strait will be connected to each other through a railway tunnel connection under the Istanbul Strait. The line goes underground at Yedikule, continues through the Yenikapı and Sirkeci new underground stations, passes under the Istanbul Strait, connects to the Üsküdar new underground station and emerges at Sögütlüçesme. The entire upgraded and new railway system will be approximately 76 km long. The main structures and systems; include the immersed tube tunnel, bored tunnels, cut-and-cover tunnels, at - grade structures, three new underground stations, 37 surface stations (renovation and upgrading), operations control centre, yards, workshops, maintenance facilities, upgrading of existing tracks including a new third track on ground, completely new electrical and mechanical systems and procurement of modern railway vehicles. The idea of a railway tunnel under the Istanbul Strait was first raised in 1860. However, where the tunnel under the Istanbul Strait crosses the deepest parts of the Strait, the old-fashioned techniques would not allow the tunnel to be on or under the seabed, and therefore the design indicated a "floating" type of tunnel placed on pillars constructed on the seabed.
    [Show full text]
  • Cilt 6, Sayı 2
    LIMNOFISH-Journal of Limnology and Freshwater Fisheries Research 6(2): 88-99 (2020) Trophic State Assessment of Brackish Bafa Lake (Turkey) Based on Community Structure of Zooplankton Atakan SUKATAR1 , Alperen ERTAS1* , İskender GÜLLE2 , İnci TUNEY KIZILKAYA1 1Ege University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, 35100 Bornova, İzmir, TURKEY 2Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Faculty of Science and Arts, Department of Biology, Burdur, TURKEY ABSTRACT ARTICLE INFO Zooplankton abundance and composition are one of the most important factors RESEARCH ARTICLE which affect the food web in aquatic ecosystems. The purpose of this study was to determine the water quality of Bafa Lake in Turkey, based on zooplankton Received : 25.01.2020 communities. As the study case, Bafa Lake is one of the biggest lake in Turkey, Revised : 15.03.2020 and the lake is quite rich in terms of biodiversity. Bafa Lake is the under effects Accepted : 15.04.2020 of domestic, agricultural and industrial wastes that accumulate and cause the deterioration of ecology in the lake by Büyük Menderes River. With this purpose, Published : 27.08.2020 8 sampling sites were determined and zooplankton samples were collected DOI:10.17216/LimnoFish.680070 monthly for two years. TSINRot index and various versions of diversity indices were used to determine the water quality and ecological status of Bafa Lake. To determine similarities between the stations, the stations were clustered by using * CORRESPONDING AUTHOR UPGMA based on zooplankton fauna. By applying Pearson Correlation, [email protected] correlations between the indices based on zooplankton fauna were assessed. With Phone : +90 506 586 37 92 the identification of collected zooplankton, a total of 73 taxa which belong to groups of Rotifera, Cladocera, Copepoda, and Meroplankton were detected.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing at the Galata Bridge, Đstanbul, in 2011-2012
    J. Black Sea/Mediterranean Environment Vol. 18, No.2: 223-237 (2012) RESEARCH ARTICLE Fishing at the Galata Bridge, Đstanbul, in 2011-2012 Nao Iwano 1,2 *, Ayaka Amaha Öztürk 2,3 1Faculity of Marine Science, Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Minato-ku, Tokyo, JAPAN 2Faculty of Fisheries, Istanbul University, 34470, Laleli-Istanbul, TURKEY 3Turkish Marine Research Foundation (TUDAV), 34820, Beykoz-Istanbul, TURKEY *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract The Galata Bridge, located at the entrance of the Gulf of Golden Horn, Istanbul, is famous for many fishermen fishing from the bridge. The Bridge was visited regularly to collect the information on the fish species and amount caught, fishing equipment, and number of fishermen from March 2011 to March 2012. Trachurus spp. , Spicara spp. and Mugil spp. were typically seen throughout the year. In addition, with seasonal change, 20 fish species were observed. The average number of fishermen was 203 per day, and the estimated total fish catch amount at the Galata Bridge was about 64 tonnes in a year. Number of fishermen found at the Galata Bridge was constant throughout the year. Fishing materials such as fishing rods, fishing lines, baits and fishing weight, were found easily available at the bridge. This is the first systematic study on the fishing and related activities at the Galata Bridge. Keywords: Galata Bridge, Golden Horn, amateur fishing, Istanbul Introduction Generally speaking, Turkish people do not consume much fish compared to the average fish consumption of the world although Turkey is surrounded by the Black Sea, Aegean Sea and Mediterranean Sea, which is a good position to consume various fish and sea food.
    [Show full text]
  • Inter-Regional Migration and Intermarriage Among Kurds in Turkey, Economics and Sociology, Vol
    Sinan Zeyneloğlu, Yaprak Civelek, 139 ISSN 2071-789X Ibrahim Sirkeci RECENT ISSUES IN SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH Zeyneloğlu, S., Civelek, Y., Sirkeci, I. (2016), Inter-regional Migration and Intermarriage among Kurds in Turkey, Economics and Sociology, Vol. 9, No 1, pp. 139-161. DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-1/10 Sinan Zeyneloğlu, INTER-REGIONAL MIGRATION Zirve University, Gaziantep, Turkey, AND INTERMARRIAGE AMONG Regent’s Centre for Transnational KURDS IN TURKEY Studies, Regent’s University, London, UK, ABSTRACT. This study examines interregional migration E-mail: [email protected] and intermarriage of internal migrant Kurds in Turkey using the latest available census data. Unlike many other Yaprak Civelek, studies, birth region is used as a proxy of ethnicity due to Istanbul Arel University, the apparent language shift among the Kurds in Turkey. Istanbul, Turkey, To ensure comparability, only regions where both Turkish E-mail: and Kurdish populations co-exist are selected for analysis [email protected] of intermarriage. Analysis of language shift is based on the 2003 Turkish Demographic Health Survey data to ensure Ibrahim Sirkeci, temporal comparability with the 2000 Census. Variables Regent’s Centre for Transnational used for tabulation are sex, age group, region of residence Studies, and educational attainment. As prevalence of intermarriage Regent’s University, remains rather constant within each education category, London, UK, the increase in intermarriage of Kurds to non-Kurds at the E-mail: [email protected] aggregate level appears to be a product of rising education. Also the gender gap in favour of males appears to be a construct of differences in educational attainment levels, since Kurdish women out-marry more than their male co- ethnics once they have completed primary education or Received: October, 2015 studied further.
    [Show full text]
  • The Socio-Spatial Transformation of Beyazit Square
    THE SOCİO-SPATIAL TRANSFORMATION OF BEYAZIT SQUARE A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES OF İSTANBUL ŞEHİR UNIVERSITY BY BÜŞRA PARÇA KÜÇÜKGÖZ IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN SOCIOLOGY FEBRUARY 2018 ABSTRACT THE SOCIO-SPATIAL TRANSFORMATION OF BEYAZIT SQUARE Küçükgöz Parça, Büşra. MA in Sociology Thesis Advisor: Assoc. Prof. Eda Ünlü Yücesoy February 2018, 136 Pages In this study, I elaborated formation and transformation of the Beyazıt Square witnessed in modernization process of Turkey. Throughout the research, I examine thematically the impacts of socio-political breaks the on shaping of Beyazıt Square since the 19th century. According to Lefebvre's theory of the spatial triad, which is conceptualized as perceived space, conceived space and lived space, I focus on how Beyazıt Square is imagined and reproduced and how it corresponds to unclear everyday life. I also discuss the creation of ideal public space and society as connected with the arrangement of Beyazit Square. In this thesis, I tried to discuss the Beyazıt Square which has a significant place in social history in the light of an image of “ideal public space or square". Keywords: Beyazıt Square, Public Space, Conceived Space, Lived Space, Lefebvre, Production of Space. iv ÖZ BEYAZIT MEYDANI’NIN SOSYO-MEKANSAL DÖNÜŞÜMÜ Küçükgöz Parça, Büşra. Sosyoloji Yüksek Lisans Programı Tez Danışmanı: Doç. Dr. Eda Ünlü Yücesoy Şubat 2018, 136 Sayfa Bu çalışmada, Türkiye'nin modernleşme sürecine tanıklık eden Beyazıt Meydanı'nın oluşum ve dönüşümünü araştırdım. Araştırma boyunca özellikle sosyo-politik kırılmaların Beyazıt Meydanı'nın şekillenmesinde ne tür etkiler yarattığını 19.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Road Network and Traffic Volume
    The Study on Integrated Urban Transportation Master Plan for Istanbul Metropolitan Area in the Republic of Turkey Final Report Chapter 3 Chapter 3 Road Network and Traffic Volume 3.1 Road Network 3.1.1 Inter-regional Road Network 1) Existing Road Turkey is situated at the transit corridor between South-east Europe and the Middle East. Since “The Declaration for The Construction of International Arteries” (AGR) prepared by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN/ECE) in 1950 in Geneva, Turkey has developed international corridors connecting it to Southern Europe, because the international road network of AGR included an extension to Turkey. According to the provisions of AGR, two arteries should reach Turkey as E-Road. These are E-80 entering from the Bulgarian border (Kapikule) and E-90 entering from the Greek border (Ipsala). These two main routes link the International Road Network of Europe with the Middle East and Asia at southern and eastern borders of Turkey via Anatolia. Source: KGM, Ministry of Transportation Figure 3.1.1 International Road Network through Turkey, 2007 In addition to the E-Roads, the Trans-European Motorway (TEM) project is ongoing and it covers the whole country as an expressway network. The TEM highway network in Turkey starts from Edirne at the Bulgarian border and passes through Istanbul via the Fatih Sultan Mehmet Bridge and parts into two branches in Ankara going eastward and southward. Its eastern branch again parts into two branches in Askale. One of them reaches Trabzon in the Black Sea Region, and the other ends in Gurbulak at the Iranian border.
    [Show full text]
  • The Happiest City in Turkey: Letter from Eskişehir June 2-4, 2018
    1 The Happiest City in Turkey: Letter from Eskişehir June 2-4, 2018 © Houchang E. Chehabi, 2018 2 A few years ago I attended a talk in which the Turkish city of Eskişehir featured prominently. The speaker showed us how the municipal authorities had restored buildings and rebuilt bridges, turning the city into a visually pleasant place, thereby making it an attractive place to live. And a few months ago I read an article which said that the people of Eskişehir are the happiest in Turkey. So when I learnt that the city is now connected to Istanbul by a bullet train, I decided to go and see for myself. Getting to the train terminal was a bit time-consuming but not difficult. For the time being the bullet train’s Istanbul terminal is located at Pendik, about 25 kilometers east of the city’s core. I took the tram from Sultanahmet to Sirkeci, thence the Marmaray train to Ayrılık Çeşmesi. Here I changed to the Metro, getting off at the Pendik station, where taxis were waiting to take passengers to the train station. Istanbul-Eskişheir ticket cost less than $ 10.00! The bullet train is Siemens-built, and there are plans to extend the network to all the major Turkish cities. The ride was pleasant. At times the speed was an unremarkable 60 km/h, but I have no complaints, since building tracks straight enough for very high velocities would have wreaked havoc on the very beautiful hilly landscape south-east of Istanbul. (Coming back from Eskişehir two days later, the train accelerated from stand-still to 250 km/h in a mere five minutes.) Figure 1: A YHT train at the Eskişehir station At the station in Eskişehir I hailed a taxi and told the driver to take me to the merkez, where I could find an otel.
    [Show full text]
  • Galata, Pera, Beyoğlu; a Biography
    GALATA, PERA, BEYOĞLU; A BIOGRAPHY Brendan Freely was born in New Jersey in 1959, and in 1960 was moved to Istanbul, where he spent his childhood and adolescence. He studied at Rockwell College in Ireland and at Yale University. Later, he traveled and performed a variety of odd jobs, including a stint with a circus in California, after which he worked as a social-worker in Boston for some years. In 1995 he returned to Istanbul, where he earns his living as a freelance literary translator. John Freely was born in New York in 1926. He joined the U.S. navy at the age of seventeen and served in commando unit in the Pacific, Burma and China for the last two years of World War II. After the war, he graduated from Iona College and received his PhD degree in physics from New York University. In 1960 he moved to Istanbul, where he taught physics, astronomy and the history of science at Robert College, which later became Boğaziçi University. His first book, Strolling Through Istanbul, co-authored with Hilary Sumner-Boyd, was published in 1972. He has written over fifty books, many of them about Turkey. Among his books published by YKY are: A History of Robert College, the American College for Girls and Boğaziçi University (2000) and the 5 volume Türkiye Uygarlıklar Rehberi [Guide to the Civilizations of Turkey] (2002). BRENDAN FREELY JOHN FREELY Galata, Pera, Beyoğlu: A Biography Yapı Kredi Yayınları - 4562 Literature - 1294 Galata, Pera, Beyoğlu: A Biography / Brendan Freely - John Freely Editor: Nazlı Güher Beydeş Proofreading: Darmin Hadzibegoviç Cover design: Nahide Dikel Page layout: Mehmet Ulusel Graphic design: İlknur Efe Print: Acar Basım ve Cilt San.
    [Show full text]
  • From Anatolia to the New World Life Stories of the First Turkish Immigrants to America LİBRA KİTAP: 65 HISTORY: 54 © Libra Kitapçılık Ve Yayıncılık
    From Anatolia to the New World Life Stories of the First Turkish Immigrants to America LİBRA KİTAP: 65 HISTORY: 54 © Libra Kitapçılık ve Yayıncılık Page Layout: Merhaba Grafik Cover Design: Utku Lomlu Cover Photos: Front cover: Dr. Fuad Bey guest of Ottoman Welfare Association at a tea party given in his honour at Turkish Club in New York. Source: Fuad Mehmed [Umay], Amerika'da Türkler ve Gördüklerim, İstanbul, 1341, p.18. Back cover: Dr. Fuad Bey in New York with the officers of the assembly. Source: Fuad Mehmed [Umay], Amerika'da Türkler ve Gördüklerim, İstanbul, 1341, p.24. First edition: 2013 ISBN 978-605-4326-64-8 Printing and Binding Birlik Fotokopi Baskı Ozalit ve Büro Malzemeleri Sanayi ve Ticaret Ltd. Şti. Nispetiye Mah. Birlik Sokak No: 2 Nevin Arıcan Plaza 34340 Levent / İstanbul Tel: (212) 269 30 00 Certificate No: 20179 Libra Kitapçılık ve Yayıncılık Ticaret A.Ş. Ebekızı Sok. Günaydın Apt. No: 9/2 Osmanbey / İstanbul Certificate No: 15705 Tel: 90- 212-232 99 04/05 Fax: 90- 212-231 11 29 E-posta: [email protected] www.librakitap.com.tr © All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system now known or to be invented, without permission in writing from the writer, except by a reviewer who wishes to quote brief passages for inclusion in a magazine, newspaper, or broadcast or academic publication. Rifat N. Balİ ~ From Anatolia to the New World Life Stories of the First Turkish Immigrants to America r Translated from the Turkish by Michael McGaha Biography Rifat N.
    [Show full text]
  • TURKEY Threats to the World Heritage in the Changing Metropolitan Areas of Istanbul
    Turkey 175 TURKEY Threats to the World Heritage in the Changing Metropolitan Areas of Istanbul The Historic Areas of Istanbul on the Bosporus peninsula were in- scribed in 1985 in the World Heritage List, not including Galata and without a buffer zone to protect the surroundings. Risks for the historic urban topography of Istanbul, especially by a series of high- rise buildings threatening the historic urban silhouette, were already presented in Heritage at Risk 2006/2007 (see the visual impact as- sessment study by Astrid Debold-Kritter on pp. 159 –164). In the last years, dynamic development and transformation have changed the metropolitan areas with a new scale of building inter- ventions and private investments. Furthermore, the privatisation of urban areas and the development of high-rise buildings with large ground plans or in large clusters have dramatically increased. orld eritagea,,eerules and standards set upby arely knownconveyrthe ap- provedConflicts in managing the World Heritage areas of Istanbul Metropolis derive from changing the law relevant for the core area- sisthe . Conservation sites and areas of conservation were proposed in 1983. In 1985, the historic areas of Istanbul were inscribed on the basis of criteria 1 to 4. The four “core areas”, Archaeological Park, Süleymaniye conservation site, Zeyrek conservation site, and the Theodosian land walls were protected by Law 2863, which in Article I (4) gives a definition of “conservation” and of “areas of conservation”. Article II defines right and responsibility: “cultural and natural property cannot be acquired through possession”; article Fig. 1. Project for Diamond of Dubai, 2010, height 270 m, 53 floors, Hattat 17 states that “urban development plans for conservation” have to Holding Arch.
    [Show full text]