Products of Caddis-Fly Larvae (Trichoptera) Silk Glands As a New

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Products of Caddis-Fly Larvae (Trichoptera) Silk Glands As a New Marina Michalak, Mariusz Tszydel*, Products of Caddis-fly Larvae Trichoptera( ) Jadwiga Bilska, Izabella Krucińska Silk Glands as a New Natural Textile Fibre Technical University of Łódź, Abstract Department of Textile Marketing and Engineering, Among the invertebrates, some insects are able to produce natural silk fibres which can ul. Żeromskiego 116, 90-543 Łódź, Poland serve as an alternative to the threads of the spider’s web. The larvae of the caddis-fly [email protected] make use of a multifunctional silky floss in producing hunting nets and residential tubular structures. Many species of caddis-fly build their capture webs in fast-flowing rivers. *Department of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Therefore we suggest that such fibres must be strong. However, these webs have been University of Łódź, studied and researched previously, taking into consideration the webs’ shape and the ul. Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Łódź, Poland geometry of the meshes. This paper presents preliminary results concerning some of the [email protected] web material’s morphological properties and tensile strength. We investigated the product of silk gland coming from Hydropsyche pellucidula, which is one of the most common caddisflies in Polish lowland rivers. Our researches proved that a cross-section of caddis- fly fibres is circular, with an average diameter of 10 µm. The mean tensile strength of the fibres investigated is 45 cN/tex (5.7⋅109 N/m2), and is comparable to the strength of most spider thread. Key words: natural silk fibers, silk gland, morphological properties, caddis-flies, tensile strength, Hydropsyche pellucidula. Caddis-fly larvae are similar to spiders, and detritus (unidentified, disintegrated butterflycaterpillars (e.g. silkworms) organic matter) can fall into it [19]. and blackflies (Simuliidae, Diptera) in their ability to produce a cocoon shell in Each species has its own web mesh the form of a multifunctional silky floss. shape and diameter, and the way the web Taking into account the variety of forms is mounted depends on environmental and versatility of silken products, it may conditions (Figure 3) [10]. be concluded the mastery of making co- coons is comparable in Trichoptera and Irrespective of hydrological conditions, Araneinae. webs are usually highly regular in their n Introduction mesh size and pattern (Figure 4). Insects are the most widely distributed The fact that the caddis-fly’s ability to The structure and shape of a web may and frequently the most abundant group spin silky floss was known in the past, also depend on temperature [6]. The of invertebrates in the world. They in- not only to biologolists, is confirmed by minimum temperature at which webs clude caddis-flies (Trichoptera), which the text: are built is also a characteristic feature are not a commonly known species. They “O what tangled webs the caddis weave, are merolimnic insects, whose larvae and when first they practise to deceive!” pupae, with few exceptions, prefer aquat- ‘Marmion, Sir Walter Scott, 1808. ic ecosystems, while the adults (imagos) a) are pharate stages. The larvae of caddis- Larvae of caddis-flies use a silky floss flies are found in all types of freshwater which is a product of their spinning and marine environments. glands (Figure 1) to build various ac- commodation structures. The ‘weaving’ is done by the elements of the mouthpart b) and not by the abdomen, as in the case of spiders, which makes it much more Figure 2. Simple structures in the form of precise. holes and hunting tunnels of caddis-flies: a) Lype reducta [9], b) Wormaldia occipi- RESEARCH ANDRESEARCH DEVELOPMENT – CURRENT PUBLICATIONS talis [16]. Some caddis-fly larvae build only simple structures: padded holes, corridors, hunt- ing tunnels (Figure 2). The larvae can a) easily move inside them. Such holes may b) have continuations in the form of ‘signal- ling threads’, which inform the predatory caddis-flies about the prey that stumbles a) over the threads, or about intruders [5]. Others build fully-fledged webs. These b) have a shape of a tunnel-like sieve, inside which the caddis-fly awaits its prey. The Figure 1. Location of spinning glands: inlet of such a structure is always directed a) in the body of the caddis-fly Neureclipsis Figure 3. Web shape of Hydropsyche bimaculata, b) the opening of silk glands at against the water current, so not only live angustipennis, depending on the substratum: the haustellum [2]. organisms but also fragments of plants a) plant [13], b) stone [19]. 28 FIBRES & TEXTILES in Eastern Europe January / December 2005, Vol. 13, No. 6 (54) FIBRES & TEXTILES in Eastern Europe January / December 2005, Vol. 13, No. 6 (54) 29 build their webs in river currents. They a) are usually stretched between aquatic b) plants, mainly submerged macrophytes or floating leaves (Figure 6). The most spectacular builder in this fam- ily is Plectrocnemia conspersa. We know [26] at least three types of webs built by c) P. conspersa, depending on water depth and velocity. In rivers of fast current, the web resembles a –‘swallow’s nest’ length of mesh width of mesh (Figure 7a), and a ‘hammock’ in shallow streams (up to 5 cm deep) (Figure 7b). In d) area of mesh deeper rivers the web is placed on the bot- tom, with the funnel-like openings turned Figure 6. Different types of webs and web- Figure 4. Web of caddis-fly larvae of the upwards, in this way catching victims houses of caddis-fly larvae from the family genus Hydropsyche [20]. moving along the bottom (invertebrates) Polycentropodidae: a) Holocentropus or settling organic matter (Figure 7c). dubius, b) Cyrnus flavidus, c) and d) N. bimaculata. a and b [23], c [13], d [2]. Using the silky floss to build a web is not this fabric’s only application. Without the floss, it would be impossible to form another characteristic structure, the house. a) Usually, the larva begins building its house by spinning a silky tubular structure, into which it builds elements forming the house (Figure 8): fragments of plants, detritus, sand, small stones and so on [14, 21, 15]. A strong floss and an organic or inorganic substrate are also the basic components b) of the house built for the pupa (Figure 9 - see page 30). All types of caddis-flies, in the fifth larval stage, start building this, because without the cocoon it would be im- c) possible for the specimen to metamorphose into the later stage. Figure 7. Different types of webs made by Caddis-fly larvae usually build their webs P. conspersa depending on environmental conditions in running waters: a. fast-mov- in fast-flowing rivers, and so the cocoon ing river, b. shallow river, c. deep river [5]. shell they produce must be strong. The product of Trichoptera’s spinning (silk) glands could be an alternative to a Figure 5. Scheme of web building by spider’s floss. Unlike spiders, caddis-flies caddisfly H. angustipennis [19]. fairly often produce cocoon shells in man- made conditions. It is much easier to breed for a given species (in low temperatures them, because cannibalism among them RESEARCH ANDRESEARCH DEVELOPMENT – CURRENT PUBLICATIONS some Hydropsychidae species, e.g. is not observed, which does happen in H. angustipennis, do not build webs) spiders (Arachnida). Unfortunately, we do [18]. However, web building always con- not find much significant data in literature sists of a set of similar actions, which are on the properties of fibres made by cad- shown in Figure 5. dis-flies. Therefore the aim of the studies that have been undertaken is to analyse One of the most impressive webs, tubu- the physical-mechanical properties, com- lar in shape, is built by N. bimaculata position and chemical structure of the (Polycentropodidae); it may be 20 cm cocoon shell which these insects produce. long, whereas the larva itself is no longer than 2 cm. Despite being so big, its mesh n is incredibly small, 0.45×0.45 µm; this is Study material one of the denser webs built by caddis- For microscopy observations, samples Figure 8. The course of the initial phase of flies [17]. Larvae of the family Polycen- were selected for the present studies from house-building whose construction requires tropodidae, with a few exceptions, do not different types of cocoon shell made by the product of spinning glands [16]. 28 FIBRES & TEXTILES in Eastern Europe January / December 2005, Vol. 13, No. 6 (54) FIBRES & TEXTILES in Eastern Europe January / December 2005, Vol. 13, No. 6 (54) 29 sary to determine the linear density of the fibres studied. In order to do this, after determining the breaking force and elon- gation, the broken parts of the fibres were placed on a micro-slide in an alcoholic medium, and then under the microscope; the crosswise dimensions of fibres were determined. In this case a Lanametr pro- jection microscope was used. The value of the crosswise dimension as determined by an optical method was considered on the fibre diameter. The mean diameter dav was determined for each fibre on the basis of 20 measurements. Later, its linear Figure 9. Pupal case and the structure of floss weave in the cocoon of larva Rhyacophila density Tt was calculated. subovata [13]. n Results Table 1. Tensile properties of Caddisfly fibres. Microscopy observations No. of F, cN ε, % σ, cN/tex L, cN cm d , µm Tt, tex sample av Images of fibres taken from the studied 1 10.31 23.8 26.2 2.45 25 0.393 samples are presented in Figures 10a - 2 5.40 16.0 21.5 0.86 20 0.251 10g. They were registered on the stand 3 5.40 18.0 21.5 0.97 20 0.251 for computer image analysis.
Recommended publications
  • Bottom Fauna of the Mississippi River Near Keokuk, Iowa, with Particular Reference to Possible Control of Ephemeroptera and Tric
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1963 Bottom fauna of the Mississippi River near Keokuk, Iowa, with particular reference to possible control of Ephemeroptera and Trichoptera Clarence Albert Carlson Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Carlson, Clarence Albert, "Bottom fauna of the Mississippi River near Keokuk, Iowa, with particular reference to possible control of Ephemeroptera and Trichoptera " (1963). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 2956. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/2956 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BOTTOM FAUNA OF HIE MISSISSIPPI RIVER NEAR KEOKUK, IOWA, VttlH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO POSSIBLE CONTROL OF EmEMEROPTBRA AND TRICHOPTBRA by Clarence Albert Carlson, Jr. A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF miLOSOHiY Major Subject: Zoology Approved: Signature was redacted for privacy. n Charge of Major Work Signature was redacted for privacy. Head of Major Department Signature was redacted for privacy. Dean, College Iowa State University
    [Show full text]
  • Filter-Feeding Ecology of Aquatic Insects
    Annual Reviews www.annualreviews.org/aronline AnmRev. F.ntomol. 1980. 25:103-32 Copyright© 1980 by AnnualReviews Inc. All rights reserved FILTER-FEEDING ECOLOGY ~6185 OF AQUATIC INSECTS J. BruceWallace Departmentof Entomology,University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602 Richard W. Merritt Departmentof Entomology,Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan48824 INTRODUCTION Filter feeders are organisms that have evolved various sieving mechanisms for removing particulate matter from suspension (100). Several groups aquatic insects, with habitats ranging from high elevation streams to saltwa- ter estuaries, use this feeding methodand consumesignificant quantities of suspended material (seston), including living organisms and both organic and inorganic detritus. Filter-feeding insects constitute important pathways for energy flow and are very important in the productivity of aquatic environments. Yet, someof these animals epitomize the complexrelation- ship between manand insects since biting adults of certain groups are amongman’s oldest adversaries. The major objectives of this article are to review the meansby which filter-feeding insects obtain their food and to assess the role of these animals in aquatic ecosystems.Filter-feeding strate- gies by other invertebrates in both marine and freshwater habitats have been partially reviewed elsewhere (82, 100, 101). SOURCES OF FOOD Lotic ecosystems in forested regions receive large inputs of allochthonous organic matter (4, 36-38, 98, 137). Anderson& Sedell (4) recently reviewed the role of macroinvertebrates in detritus processing. There is ample evi- dence from lotic studies that the concentration of particulate organic seston 103 0066-4170/80/0101-0103501.00 Annual Reviews www.annualreviews.org/aronline 104 WALLACE& MERRITT is skewed toward the smallest size fractions (<50 /zm) (119, 148, 191).
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Ecosystem Services of Trichoptera
    Review Diversity and Ecosystem Services of Trichoptera John C. Morse 1,*, Paul B. Frandsen 2,3, Wolfram Graf 4 and Jessica A. Thomas 5 1 Department of Plant & Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, E-143 Poole Agricultural Center, Clemson, SC 29634-0310, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Plant & Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, 701 E University Parkway Drive, Provo, UT 84602, USA; [email protected] 3 Data Science Lab, Smithsonian Institution, 600 Maryland Ave SW, Washington, D.C. 20024, USA 4 BOKU, Institute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecology Management, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor Mendelstr. 33, A-1180 Vienna, Austria; [email protected] 5 Department of Biology, University of York, Wentworth Way, York Y010 5DD, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-864-656-5049 Received: 2 February 2019; Accepted: 12 April 2019; Published: 1 May 2019 Abstract: The holometabolous insect order Trichoptera (caddisflies) includes more known species than all of the other primarily aquatic orders of insects combined. They are distributed unevenly; with the greatest number and density occurring in the Oriental Biogeographic Region and the smallest in the East Palearctic. Ecosystem services provided by Trichoptera are also very diverse and include their essential roles in food webs, in biological monitoring of water quality, as food for fish and other predators (many of which are of human concern), and as engineers that stabilize gravel bed sediment. They are especially important in capturing and using a wide variety of nutrients in many forms, transforming them for use by other organisms in freshwaters and surrounding riparian areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Phenology of the Epibenthic Macroinvertebrate Fauna in a First Order Mississippi Stream
    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Master's Theses Summer 8-2017 Biodiversity and Phenology of the Epibenthic Macroinvertebrate Fauna in a First Order Mississippi Stream Jamaal Bankhead University of Southern Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses Recommended Citation Bankhead, Jamaal, "Biodiversity and Phenology of the Epibenthic Macroinvertebrate Fauna in a First Order Mississippi Stream" (2017). Master's Theses. 308. https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/308 This Masters Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BIODIVERSITY AND PHENOLOGY OF THE EPIBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES FAUNA IN A FIRST ORDER MISSISSIPPI STREAM by Jamaal Lashwan Bankhead A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School, the College of Science and Technology, and the Department of Biological Sciences at The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science August 2017 BIODIVERSITY AND PHENOLOGY OF THE EPIBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES FAUNA IN A FIRST ORDER MISSISSIPPI STREAM by Jamaal Lashwan Bankhead August 2017 Approved by: ________________________________________________ Dr. David C. Beckett, Committee Chair Professor, Biological Sciences ________________________________________________ Dr. Kevin Kuehn, Committee
    [Show full text]
  • This Work Is Licensed Under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License
    This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. THE ADULT POLYCENTROPODIDAE OF CANADA AND ADJACENT UNITED STATES Andrew P. Nimmo Department of Entomology University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E3 Quaestiones Entomologicae CANADA 22:143-252 1986 ABSTRACT Of the 46 species reported herefrom Canada and adjacent States of the United States, four belong to the genus Cernotina Ross, one to Cyrnellus (Banks), three to Neureclipsis McLachlan, five to Nyctiophylax Brauer, and 33 to Polycentropus Curtis. Keys are provided (for males and females, both, where possible) to genera and species. For each species the habitus is given in some detail, with diagnostic statements for the genitalia. Also included are brief statements on biology (if known), and distribution. Distributions are mapped, and genitalia are fully illustrated. RESUME Quarante six especes de Polycentropodidae sont mentionneespour le Canada et les Hats frontaliers des Etats-Vnis, representant les genres suivants: Cernotina Ross (4), Cyrnellus (Banks) (I), Neureclipsis McLachlan (3), Nyctiophylax Brauer (5) et Polycentropus Curtis (33). Des clefs d'identification au genre et a I'espece (pour les males et les feme I les) sont presentees par I'auteur. Un habitus ainsi qui une description diagnostique des pieces genitals sont donnes pour chacune des especes. Une description resume ce qui il y a de connir sur I'histoire naturelle et la repartition geographique de ces especes.
    [Show full text]
  • Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Megaloptera, and Trichoptera of Great Smoky Mountains National Park
    The Great Smoky Mountains National Park All Taxa Biodiversity Inventory: A Search for Species in Our Own Backyard 2007 Southeastern Naturalist Special Issue 1:159–174 Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Megaloptera, and Trichoptera of Great Smoky Mountains National Park Charles R. Parker1,*, Oliver S. Flint, Jr.2, Luke M. Jacobus3, Boris C. Kondratieff 4, W. Patrick McCafferty3, and John C. Morse5 Abstract - Great Smoky Mountains National Park (GSMNP), situated on the moun- tainous border of North Carolina and Tennessee, is recognized as one of the most highly diverse protected areas in the temperate region. In order to provide baseline data for the scientifi c management of GSMNP, an All Taxa Biodiversity Inventory (ATBI) was initiated in 1998. Among the goals of the ATBI are to discover the identity and distribution of as many as possible of the species of life that occur in GSMNP. The authors have concentrated on the orders of completely aquatic insects other than odonates. We examined or utilized others’ records of more than 53,600 adult and 78,000 immature insects from 545 locations. At present, 469 species are known from GSMNP, including 120 species of Ephemeroptera (mayfl ies), 111 spe- cies of Plecoptera (stonefl ies), 7 species of Megaloptera (dobsonfl ies, fi shfl ies, and alderfl ies), and 231 species of Trichoptera (caddisfl ies). Included in this total are 10 species new to science discovered since the ATBI began. Introduction Great Smoky Mountains National Park (GSMNP) is situated on the border of North Carolina and Tennessee and is comprised of 221,000 ha. GSMNP is recognized as one of the most diverse protected areas in the temperate region (Nichols and Langdon 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • The Trichoptera of North Carolina
    Families and genera within Trichoptera in North Carolina Spicipalpia (closed-cocoon makers) Integripalpia (portable-case makers) RHYACOPHILIDAE .................................................60 PHRYGANEIDAE .....................................................78 Rhyacophila (Agrypnia) HYDROPTILIDAE ...................................................62 (Banksiola) Oligostomis (Agraylea) (Phryganea) Dibusa Ptilostomis Hydroptila Leucotrichia BRACHYCENTRIDAE .............................................79 Mayatrichia Brachycentrus Neotrichia Micrasema Ochrotrichia LEPIDOSTOMATIDAE ............................................81 Orthotrichia Lepidostoma Oxyethira (Theliopsyche) Palaeagapetus LIMNEPHILIDAE .....................................................81 Stactobiella (Anabolia) GLOSSOSOMATIDAE ..............................................65 (Frenesia) Agapetus Hydatophylax Culoptila Ironoquia Glossosoma (Limnephilus) Matrioptila Platycentropus Protoptila Pseudostenophylax Pycnopsyche APATANIIDAE ..........................................................85 (fixed-retreat makers) Apatania Annulipalpia (Manophylax) PHILOPOTAMIDAE .................................................67 UENOIDAE .................................................................86 Chimarra Neophylax Dolophilodes GOERIDAE .................................................................87 (Fumanta) Goera (Sisko) (Goerita) Wormaldia LEPTOCERIDAE .......................................................88 PSYCHOMYIIDAE ....................................................68
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2020
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2020 Hickory Nut Gorge Green Salamander (Aneides caryaensis) Photo by Austin Patton 2014 Compiled by Judith Ratcliffe, Zoologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Animal Species of North Carolina 2020 Compiled by Judith Ratcliffe, Zoologist North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate. The list is published periodically, generally every two years.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Polycentropodidae Ulmer, 1903 (Trichoptera: Annulipalpia: Psychomyioidea) Inferred from Larval, Pupal and Adult Characters
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Invertebrate Systematics, 2011, 25, 219-253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/IS10024 Phylogeny of Polycentropodidae Ulmer, 1903 (Trichoptera: Annulipalpia: Psychomyioidea) inferred from larval, pupal and adult characters Maria Lourdes Chamorro ' ' and Ralph W. Holzenthal ^University of Minnesota, Department of Entomology, 1980 Folwell Avenue, 219 Hodson Hall, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA. ^National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Department of Entomology, MRC 168, PO Box 37012, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA. ""Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Phylogeny of Polycentropodidae Ulmer is inferred based on data from immature and adult stages. Larval information is unknown for 61% of the taxa included in this study. To understand the effects of including characters with large sets of missing data, three alternative datasets were analysed using parsimony and Bayesian methods. Five outgroup taxa, including the four families in Psychomyioidea and the single family in Hydropsychoidea, were used in all datasets. Monophyly of Polycentropodidae, as currently defined, was rejected and the monophyly of the three largest cosmopolitan genera, Polycentropus, Polyplectropus and Nyctiophylax, was not confirmed. Monophyly of Pseudoneureclipsinae, including the genera Antillopsyche and Pseudoneureclipsis, was supported in all analyses. The placement of Pseudoneureclipsis within Dipseudopsidae was rejected. Monophyly of Kambaitipsychinae was supported, but its placement within Polycentropodidae was not
    [Show full text]
  • The Beginner's Guide to Caddis (Order Trichoptera)
    Volume 62 • February 2003 15 The Beginner’s Guide to Caddis (Order Trichoptera) by Ian Wallace Keeper of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museums and Galleries on Merseyside, William Brown Street, Liverpool, L3 8EN. Illustrated by Phil Wilkins (7607) Peregrine Productions, The Summerhouse, Orford Road, Tunstall, Suffolk IP12 2JA. Adult Rhyacophila septentrionis Agapetus fuscipes larva in case Caddis larvae, living in a case they have made, are some of the most familiar freshwater insects. They are thought to derive their name from Elizabethan street hawkers called caddice men who sold braid and had samples stitched to their coats. While the common name for the group is derived from the larva, the scientific name for the order, Trichoptera, alludes to the hairy covering of the adult’s wings. A few species rely on the hairs to form the wing pattern in the same way that the related Lepidoptera rely on scales. However, in the majority of caddis the brown or grey pattern of the wings is in the membrane and cannot be removed by rubbing, unlike the Lepidoptera. There are 198 British and Irish species in 18 families. Encountering adult caddis As expected for an insect with an aquatic larval stage, you will encounter the largest number and variety of caddis near water. Many species fly in the early night and pass the day resting on bank-side vegetation from where they can be dislodged on to a beating tray. However you will find that, by energetic leaping, they will soon escape from the tray, even if they do not fly off. Beating into a sweeping net is more successful.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 5: Fauna Known to Occur on Fort Drum
    Appendix 5: Fauna Known to Occur on Fort Drum LIST OF FAUNA KNOWN TO OCCUR ON FORT DRUM as of January 2017. Federally listed species are noted with FT (Federal Threatened) and FE (Federal Endangered); state listed species are noted with SSC (Species of Special Concern), ST (State Threatened, and SE (State Endangered); introduced species are noted with I (Introduced). INSECT SPECIES Except where otherwise noted all insect and invertebrate taxonomy based on (1) Arnett, R.H. 2000. American Insects: A Handbook of the Insects of North America North of Mexico, 2nd edition, CRC Press, 1024 pp; (2) Marshall, S.A. 2013. Insects: Their Natural History and Diversity, Firefly Books, Buffalo, NY, 732 pp.; (3) Bugguide.net, 2003-2017, http://www.bugguide.net/node/view/15740, Iowa State University. ORDER EPHEMEROPTERA--Mayflies Taxonomy based on (1) Peckarsky, B.L., P.R. Fraissinet, M.A. Penton, and D.J. Conklin Jr. 1990. Freshwater Macroinvertebrates of Northeastern North America. Cornell University Press. 456 pp; (2) Merritt, R.W., K.W. Cummins, and M.B. Berg 2008. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, 4th Edition. Kendall Hunt Publishing. 1158 pp. FAMILY LEPTOPHLEBIIDAE—Pronggillled Mayflies FAMILY BAETIDAE—Small Minnow Mayflies Habrophleboides sp. Acentrella sp. Habrophlebia sp. Acerpenna sp. Leptophlebia sp. Baetis sp. Paraleptophlebia sp. Callibaetis sp. Centroptilum sp. FAMILY CAENIDAE—Small Squaregilled Mayflies Diphetor sp. Brachycercus sp. Heterocloeon sp. Caenis sp. Paracloeodes sp. Plauditus sp. FAMILY EPHEMERELLIDAE—Spiny Crawler Procloeon sp. Mayflies Pseudocentroptiloides sp. Caurinella sp. Pseudocloeon sp. Drunela sp. Ephemerella sp. FAMILY METRETOPODIDAE—Cleftfooted Minnow Eurylophella sp. Mayflies Serratella sp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera) of the Lake Itasca Region, Minnesota, and a Preliminary Assessment of the Conservation Status of Minnesota Trichoptera
    Conservation Biology Research Grants Program Nongame Wildlife Program Division of Ecological Services Minnesota Department of Natural Resources THE CADDISFLIES (INSECTA: TRICHOPTERA) OF THE LAKE ITASCA REGION, MINNESOTA, AND A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF MINNESOTA TRICHOPTERA A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY MARGOT PECK MONSON IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER MASTER OF SCIENCE SEPTEMBER 1994 1 © Margot Peck Monson 1994 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my major advisor, Dr. Ralph Holzenthal, for taking me on as his student and for his time, effort, and patient guidance in helping me pursue this project. I also wish to thank Dr. Roger Moon for his helpful counsel and encouragement, as well as the other members of my examination committee, Dr. William Miller and Dr. Francesca Cuthbert, for their support. I am grateful to Dr. O. J. Flint, Dr. Steve Harris, Dr. David Etnier, and the Illinois Natural History Survey for their assistance in making specimens available and for verification of some determinations. Dr. Etnier was also most generous in making several donations to the University of Minnesota Insect Collection. I am thankful for the partial funding for this project, contributed by the Nongame Wildlife Program of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and the Minnesota Chapter of The Nature Conservancy. The helpfulness of Dr. Phil Clausen, Curator of the University of Minnesota Insect Collection, was most appreciated (as was his willingness to answer my many questions). The friendship and good humor extended by my colleagues in the lab, Roger, Atilano, Jolanda, Sonia, John, and Marc, as well as Sue, Paul, Sujaya, and Diann will be fondly remembered.
    [Show full text]