Mate-Guarding in Siberian Jay (Perisoreus Infaustus)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mate-Guarding in Siberian Jay (Perisoreus Infaustus) Mate-guarding in Siberian jay (Perisoreus infaustus) Mate-guarding hos Lavskrikor (Perisoreus infaustus) Leo Ruth Faculty of Health, Science and Technology Biology Independent Research Project 15 hp Supervisor: Björn Arvidsson and Michael Griesser Examinor: Larry Greenberg 26/08-16 Serial number: 16:102 Abstract Mate-guarding is performed by many monogamous species, a method used by individuals to physically prevent competitors of the same sex from mating with their partners. This behaviour is most often displayed during the fertile period (i.e. when females can be fertilized). In this study I focused on the genetically and socially monogamous species, the Siberian jay (Perisoreus infaustus), in which I observed mate-guarding behaviour. The Siberian jays did change their behaviour and increased their aggression in the fertile period, a sign of mate-guarding. This result also suggests that even socially and genetically monogamous species do increase their aggression during the fertile period. This indicates that fidelity still requires an investment in mate-guarding to limit extra-pair mating opportunities. Mate- guarding should then be possible to find in species where there is at least a theoretical opportunity for extra-pair matings. Sammanfattning Mate-guarding är en metod använd utav många monogama arter, metoden används för att fysiskt hålla konkurrenter utav samma kön borta ifrån sin partner för att försäkra sin egen parning. Denna metod beskådas oftast under tiden honan är fertil. I denna studie fokuserade jag på den genetiska och sociala monogama arten Lavskrika(Perisoreus infaustus) där jag observerade mate-guarding beteende. Lavskrikans beteende förändrades mellan perioden då honan icke var receptiv och hon var fertil, aggressionen ökade för båda könen under den fertila perioden vilket är ett tecken utav mate-guarding beteende. Detta resultat föreslår att socialt och genetiskt monogama arter ökar sin aggression under tiden honan är fertil, det föreslår även att trofasthet fortfarande kräver hög investering utav mate-guarding för att minska riskerna utav otrohet. Mate-guarding beteende borde då finnas hos arter med en teoretisk möjlighet för otrohet. Introduction In theory, monogamy is quite straight forward and only requires having one mate, in real life, however, it is not that simple. Infidelity occurs in many species across all taxa, including socially monogamous ones, a phenomena called extra pair copulation (EPC) (Westner et al 1990). Both of the sexes in a monogamous pair can benefit from mating with individuals outside the pair. There are several benefits associated with EPC for females, for example; an extra-pair male may have good genes, or it could be an insurance in case of infertility from their partner (Griffith et al 2002). Males have the possibility to mate with an large number of females and usually takes the opportunity to mate if this option is available. In species with bi-parental care, females have a higher initial investment than males, but males may contribute with helping to raise offspring (Trivers 1972). In pairs where female successfully mate with an extra-pair male, males pay a fitness costs by raising offspring that are not their own. To reduce the occurrence of female EPC, males use mate-guarding. Mate guarding occurs in species with bi-parental care, predominantly during the fertile period where males keep in close vicinity of the female and aggressively chase other males away from this territory (Beecher & Beecher 1979 ; Birkhead. 1979). Similarly, female increase their aggression towards other females, to reduce the opportunities for her mate to engage in EPC (Birkhead. 1979). Most monogamous species use some form of biparental care where both sexes invest in the rearing of offspring (Brotherton & Komers 2003). Here, I investigated mate guarding in a socially and genetically monogamous bird species, the Siberian Jay (Perisoreus infaustus). This species is year-round territorial and live in small flocks with only one mating pair and some retained offspring but usually also includes immigrants in the flock (Blomgren 1971; Ekman et al 1994). Retained offspring may stay up to five years within the flock, dominant siblings displace subordinate brood mates out of the flock. Retained offspring disperse if the opportunity for breeding arrive, but they do not act as helpers. Incubating female are fed by males (Ekman et al 1994). Even if the retained young does not act as helpers they are more tolerated by the breeders then immigrants (Ekman et al 1994). The breeders also have a difference tolerance level in immigrants, aggression is for instance higher against same sex immigrants (Ekman & Sklepkochy 1994). Siberian jays are single brooded, monogamous and has high male assistance in offspring rearing, three criteria suggesting a higher probability of mate-guarding (Barsh 1976). The Siberian jays are hence a prime candidate to study mate-guarding. Since guarding increases in the fertile period we would expect a change in the behaviour when this period begins. Materials & methods Study site The data was collected in a natural population of Siberian Jays in an area located near Arvidsjaur in Northern Sweden (65°40 N, 19°0 E). This population has been studied thoroughly from 1989 onwards (Griesser et al 2013; Griesser et al 2015). The study site is split into two areas; the first area is located in the nature reserve Reivo where the habitat is unmanaged boreal forest (Fig. 1), the second area is on the borders of Reivo, here the habitat is mixed with managed and unmanaged boreal forests (Fig. 1). All individuals within the area have been ringed continuously since 1989 with four rings for individual recognition (Griesser et al. 2012). Figure 1. Map over the study area. The smaller map in the upper left corner displays where in Sweden the area is located. (1) Is the unmanaged area in the nature reserve Reivo. (2) The area with mixed habitat outside Reivo. Data collection Data used in this study was collected before and during the fertile period of female Jays, in March 2016, by observing social interactions in flocks on standardized feeders during 15 - minutes. The feeders are made up of one main lateral stick with two horizontal sticks attached to allow up to five individuals to forage at the same time and are baited two pieces of pig fat. The feeders were placed close to the forest edge or a tree and birds were attracted to the feeders by whistling. I assessed the aggressive interactions between flock members by using four criteria (Ekman et al 1994): (1) feeding together (individuals landing on the feeder and feeding without any sign of aggression), (2) displacement (an individual is forced away from the feeder by another member of the flock), (3) patiently waiting (individuals sitting close by waiting for a feeding opportunity) or (4) chasing (an individual is chased away from the feeder and the area followed by the aggressor). Observations were recorded on a scoring sheet, noting the social interactions between all individuals,. The observer was placed 10 – 20m away from the feeder to not disturb the Jays and was always equipped with a binocular. Statistical analysis Data were collected in 35 groups. I used linear mixed models in the package lme4 (REF) in R version 3.2.5 (R development team 2016) and used model selection to find the models with the highest explanatory degree. Model selection was run using the package MuMIn (Barton 2016), parameters where obtained after averaging over the set of best fitting models (ΔAICc < 2). Given the rarity of chasing events, I only assess the factors that influenced the number of displacements, using a Poisson distribution. The models always included two random effects: identification (ID) and territory to avoid repeated samples of the same individual and on the same territory. The independent fixed terms used in the statistical analyses are as follows: rank (breeder, non-breeder), sex of recipient (female, male, unknown), rank of recipient (breeder, non-breeder), time in group (in months), habitat (see below), group size (see below), season (before and during the fertile period) kinship between aggressor and recipient (kin, non-kin, unknown) and an interaction between group size and kinship (Caraco 1979). The habitat was defined by the proportion of unmanaged forest in a territory. Flocks living in territories with a higher quality habitat has higher survival, this could change social relationships in the group (Griesser et al 2006). Group size could inflict aggressive behaviour because in larger groups each individual has to fend for themselves while foraging and when group sizes increase the food resources might decrease (Caraco 1979). Results Model selection revealed that several factors influenced the aggression between individuals. The number of displacements was best explained by the rank of recipient, period (non-fertile vs fertile period of the female), rank, the kin relationship between actor and the recipient, sex of the recipient and time the recipient had stayed in the flock (Tab. 1). Male breeder aggression changed distinctly between the non-fertile and the fertile-period. During the non-fertile period aggression was focused on females displacing on average 0,5 females per 15-minute and non against males (Fig. 2). In the fertile period however males displaced only other males averaging 0,67 displacements per 15 minutes (Fig. 2). Females also increased their aggression towards the same sex in the fertile period (Fig. 2). Male breeder aggression towards immigrant were higher than kin in both periods, in the non-fertile period the general aggression decreased (Fig. 3). Female breeders displayed higher aggression towards kin in the non-fertile period and against non-kin the fertile period (Fig. 3). Time spent in the flock did affect aggression , most aggression was against members that had less than a year in the flock. FB on female FB on male Female breeder kin Male breeder kin Female breeder non-kin Male breeder non-kin 0,8 0,7 0,7 0,6 0,6 0,5 0,5 0,4 0,4 0,3 0,3 0,2 0,2 AVERAGE DISPLACEMENT 0,1 AVERAGE DISPLACEMENT 0,1 0 0 Non-fertile period Fertile period Non-fertile period Fertile period Figure 4.
Recommended publications
  • Tinamiformes – Falconiformes
    LIST OF THE 2,008 BIRD SPECIES (WITH SCIENTIFIC AND ENGLISH NAMES) KNOWN FROM THE A.O.U. CHECK-LIST AREA. Notes: "(A)" = accidental/casualin A.O.U. area; "(H)" -- recordedin A.O.U. area only from Hawaii; "(I)" = introducedinto A.O.U. area; "(N)" = has not bred in A.O.U. area but occursregularly as nonbreedingvisitor; "?" precedingname = extinct. TINAMIFORMES TINAMIDAE Tinamus major Great Tinamou. Nothocercusbonapartei Highland Tinamou. Crypturellus soui Little Tinamou. Crypturelluscinnamomeus Thicket Tinamou. Crypturellusboucardi Slaty-breastedTinamou. Crypturellus kerriae Choco Tinamou. GAVIIFORMES GAVIIDAE Gavia stellata Red-throated Loon. Gavia arctica Arctic Loon. Gavia pacifica Pacific Loon. Gavia immer Common Loon. Gavia adamsii Yellow-billed Loon. PODICIPEDIFORMES PODICIPEDIDAE Tachybaptusdominicus Least Grebe. Podilymbuspodiceps Pied-billed Grebe. ?Podilymbusgigas Atitlan Grebe. Podicepsauritus Horned Grebe. Podicepsgrisegena Red-neckedGrebe. Podicepsnigricollis Eared Grebe. Aechmophorusoccidentalis Western Grebe. Aechmophorusclarkii Clark's Grebe. PROCELLARIIFORMES DIOMEDEIDAE Thalassarchechlororhynchos Yellow-nosed Albatross. (A) Thalassarchecauta Shy Albatross.(A) Thalassarchemelanophris Black-browed Albatross. (A) Phoebetriapalpebrata Light-mantled Albatross. (A) Diomedea exulans WanderingAlbatross. (A) Phoebastriaimmutabilis Laysan Albatross. Phoebastrianigripes Black-lootedAlbatross. Phoebastriaalbatrus Short-tailedAlbatross. (N) PROCELLARIIDAE Fulmarus glacialis Northern Fulmar. Pterodroma neglecta KermadecPetrel. (A) Pterodroma
    [Show full text]
  • Walker Marzluff 2017 Recreation Changes Lanscape Use of Corvids
    Recreation changes the use of a wild landscape by corvids Author(s): Lauren E. Walker and John M. Marzluff Source: The Condor, 117(2):262-283. Published By: Cooper Ornithological Society https://doi.org/10.1650/CONDOR-14-169.1 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1650/CONDOR-14-169.1 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Volume 117, 2015, pp. 262–283 DOI: 10.1650/CONDOR-14-169.1 RESEARCH ARTICLE Recreation changes the use of a wild landscape by corvids Lauren E. Walker* and John M. Marzluff College of the Environment, School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA * Corresponding author: [email protected] Submitted October 24, 2014; Accepted February 13, 2015; Published May 6, 2015 ABSTRACT As urban areas have grown in population, use of nearby natural areas for outdoor recreation has also increased, potentially influencing bird distribution in landscapes managed for conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Corvids of Cañada
    !!! ! CORVIDS OF CAÑADA COMMON RAVEN (Corvus corax) AMERICAN CROW (Corvus brachyrhyncos) YELLOW-BILLED MAGPIE (Pica nuttalli) STELLER’S JAY (Cyanocitta stelleri) WESTERN SCRUB-JAY Aphelocoma californica) Five of the ten California birds in the Family Corvidae are represented here at the Cañada de los Osos Ecological Reserve. Page 1 The Common Raven is the largest and can be found in the cold of the Arctic and the extreme heat of Death Valley. It has shown itself to be one of the most intelligent of all birds. It is a supreme predator and scavenger, quite sociable at certain times of the year and a devoted partner and parent with its mate. The American Crow is black, like the Raven, but noticeably smaller. Particularly in the fall, it may occur in huge foraging or roosting flocks. Crows can be a problem for farmers at times of the year and a best friend at other times, when crops are under attack from insects or when those insects are hiding in dried up leftovers such as mummified almonds. Crows know where those destructive navel orange worms are. Smaller birds do their best to harass crows because they recognize the threat they are to their eggs and young. Crows, ravens and magpies are important members of the highway clean-up crew when it comes to roadkills. The very attractive Yellow-billed Magpie tends to nest in loose colonies and forms larger flocks in late summer or fall. In the central valley of California, they can be a problem in almond and fruit orchards, but they also are adept at catching harmful insect pests.
    [Show full text]
  • Engelsk Register
    Danske navne på alverdens FUGLE ENGELSK REGISTER 1 Bearbejdning af paginering og sortering af registret er foretaget ved hjælp af Microsoft Excel, hvor det har været nødvendigt at indlede sidehenvisningerne med et bogstav og eventuelt 0 for siderne 1 til 99. Tallet efter bindestregen giver artens rækkefølge på siden.
    [Show full text]
  • Finland - Easter on the Arctic Circle
    Finland - Easter on the Arctic Circle Naturetrek Tour Report 14 - 18 April 2017 Bohemian Waxwing by Martin Rutz Siberian Jay by Martin Rutz Willow Tit by Martin Rutz Boreal (Tengmalm’s) Owl by Martin Rutz Report compiled by Alice Tribe Images courtesy of Martin Rutz & Alice Tribe Naturetrek Mingledown Barn Wolf's Lane Chawton Alton Hampshire GU34 3HJ UK T: +44 (0)1962 733051 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Tour Report Finland - Easter on the Arctic Circle Tour participants: Ari Latja & Alice Tribe (leaders) with fourteen Naturetrek clients Day 1 Friday 14th April London to Oulu After a very early morning flight from Heathrow to Helsinki, we landed with a few hours to spend in the airport. It was here that most of the group met up, had lunch and used the facilities, with all of us being rather impressed by the choice of music in the lavatories: bird song! A few members of the group commented on the fact that there was no snow outside, which was the expected sight. It was soon time for us to board our next flight to Oulu, a journey of only one hour, but during the flight the snow levels quickly built up on the ground below us. We landed around 5pm and met a few more of our group at baggage reclaim. Once everyone had collected their luggage, we exited into the Arrivals Hall where our local guide Ari was waiting to greet us. Ari and Alice then collected our vehicles and once everyone was on board, we headed to Oulu’s Finlandia Airport Hotel, our base for the next two nights, which was literally ‘just down the road’ from Oulu Airport.
    [Show full text]
  • Acacia, Cattle and Migratory Birds in Southeastern Mexico
    Biological Conservation 80 (1997) 235-247 © 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd All rights reserved. Printed in Great Britain PII: S0006-3207(96)00137- 1 0006-3207/97 $17.00 + 0.00 ELSEVIER ACACIA, CATTLE AND MIGRATORY BIRDS IN SOUTHEASTERN MEXICO Russell Greenberg,* Peter Bichier & John Sterling Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center, National Zoological Park, Washington, DC 20008, USA (Accepted 11 July 1996) Abstract of forest-dependent migratory birds (Askins et al., Acacia pennatula groves in mid-elevation valleys of 1990). However, the new tropical landscape is usually a southern Mexico supported both the highest density and mosaic of grassland, savanna, ribbons of riparian vege- diversity of migratory birds compared to other habitats in tation and small patches of woods. The wooded habi- the region. In addition, we found the highest numbers for tats, in particular, can support an abundance of over half of the common migratory species. Despite the migratory birds (Powell et al., 1992; Warkentin et al., high degree of leaf loss during the late winter, acacia 1995). One possible strategy for increasing habitat for groves do not experience greater declines in insectivorous migratory birds is the promotion of silvopastoral sys- migratory bird populations than other local habitats. tems which integrate tree management with cattle pro- Color-marked individuals of canopy species had a strong duction on grazing lands. tendency to remain resident within a single acacia grove During several years of censusing birds on the Car- throughout the winter. Management of native acacias on ibbean slope of Chiapas, we discovered that managed subtropical rangelands for wood products, fodder, and soil patches of Acacia pennatula (Schlecht & Cham.) Benth improvement would probably directly and indirectly bene- support particularly high densities of migratory birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Perisoreus Infaustus, L
    Bibliography – SIBERIAN JAY (Unglückshäher) – Perisoreus infaustus, L. Andreev, A.V. (1977): Winter energy balance and hypothermia of the Siberian jay. Ekologiya (Moscow) 4: 66-72. [russ.] Andreev, A.V. (1982): Winter ecology of the Siberian Jay and the Nutcracker in the region of northeast Siberia. Ornitologija 17: 72-82. [russ.] Andreev, A.V. (1982): Energy budget and hypothermia of Siberian Jay in winter season. Orn. Stud. USSR 2: 364-375. Babenko, V.G. & Redkin, Y.A. (1999): Ornithogeographical characteristics of the Low Amur basin. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 78 (3): 398-408. [russ., engl. Zus.] Abstract Beuschold, E. & Beuschold, I. (1972): Erstnachweis des Unglückshähers (Perisoreus infaustus (L.)) für die DDR. [First record of Perisoreus infaustus (L.) for East Germany.] Naturkundliche Jahresberichte des Museum Heineanum 7 (0): 117-118. Blair, H.M.S. (1936): On the birds of East Finmark. Ibis 6 (13th ser.): 280-308. Blomgren, A. (1964): Lavskrika. Bonniers, Stockholm. Blomgren, A. (1971): Studies of less familiar birds. Siberian Jay. Brit. Birds 64: 25-28. Borgos, G. & Hogstad, O. (2001): Lavskrika vinterstid. [The Siberian jay in the winter.] Vår Fuglefauna 24 (4): 155-163. [norw.] Brotons, L., Monkkonen, M., Huhta, E., Nikula, A. & Rajasarkka, A. (2003): Effects of landscape structure and forest reserve location on old-growth forest bird species in Northern Finland. Landscape Ecology 18 (4): 377-393. Abstract Carlson, T. (1946): Bofynd av lavskrika (Cractes infaustus L.) med tre matande fåglar. Vår Fågelvärld 5: 37- 38. [schwed.] Carpelan, J. (1929): Einige Beobachtungen über Lebensweise und Fortpflanzung des Unglückshähers (Perisoreus infaustus) im nördlichen Finnland. Beitr. Fortpfl. Vögel 5: 60-63.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brown Jay's Furcular Pouch
    160 Vol. 44 THE BROWN JAY’S FURCULAR POUCH By GEORGE MIKSCH SUTTON and PERRY W. GILBERT Travelers along northeastern Mexico’s modern highway are apt to remark upon the scarcity of bird life. Those who motor at reasonable speed from Monterrey to Victoria, and thence to Mante, Valles, and Tamazunchale, are sure to see, and almost sure to hear, however, a crow-sized, dark gray-brown bird, with long&h tail, that in- habits the brush of the low country. This bird is in no way handsome, but its boldness, simple coloration, and obvious predilection for the roadside insure its being noticed and talked about. It belongs to that tribe of mischief makers, the Corvidae. It is the Brown Jay, Psilorhinus morio. Fig. 33. Brown Jay (Psilorhinus morio), about one-fiith iife size. Drawing by George Miksch Sutton. July, 1942 THE BROWN JAY’S FURCULAR POUCH 161 The Brown Jay almost never goes about alone. Family groups of ,five or six are the rule, although sometimes when an owl, lynx, human being, or other enemy species is being mobbed, a party of twenty or more may congregate. Excitement then runs high. Each jay must approach ‘Yhe enemy” as closely as it can, so as personally to confirm the “rumors” it has heard. Each jay must scream. If “the enemy” moves, the outcry momentarily stops short; the jays eye each other as if pondering the next move; and the hubbub of screaming starts afresh. When the senior author first encountered the Brown Jay in the vicinity of Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, in February of 1938, he was greatly struck with what he called the bird’s ‘Lhiccup.” This sound, which usually was heard just at the close of the customary scream, but often quite independently of it, was not unlike the syllable puck or buck.
    [Show full text]
  • Gear for a Big Year
    APPENDIX 1 GEAR FOR A BIG YEAR 40-liter REI Vagabond Tour 40 Two passports Travel Pack Wallet Tumi luggage tag Two notebooks Leica 10x42 Ultravid HD-Plus Two Sharpie pens binoculars Oakley sunglasses Leica 65 mm Televid spotting scope with tripod Fossil watch Leica V-Lux camera Asics GEL-Enduro 7 trail running shoes GoPro Hero3 video camera with selfie stick Four Mountain Hardwear Wicked Lite short-sleeved T-shirts 11” MacBook Air laptop Columbia Sportswear rain shell iPhone 6 (and iPhone 4) with an international phone plan Marmot down jacket iPod nano and headphones Two pairs of ExOfficio field pants SureFire Fury LED flashlight Three pairs of ExOfficio Give- with rechargeable batteries N-Go boxer underwear Green laser pointer Two long-sleeved ExOfficio BugsAway insect-repelling Yalumi LED headlamp shirts with sun protection Sea to Summit silk sleeping bag Two pairs of SmartWool socks liner Two pairs of cotton Balega socks Set of adapter plugs for the world Birding Without Borders_F.indd 264 7/14/17 10:49 AM Gear for a Big Year • 265 Wildy Adventure anti-leech Antimalarial pills socks First-aid kit Two bandanas Assorted toiletries (comb, Plain black baseball cap lip balm, eye drops, toenail clippers, tweezers, toothbrush, REI Campware spoon toothpaste, floss, aspirin, Israeli water-purification tablets Imodium, sunscreen) Birding Without Borders_F.indd 265 7/14/17 10:49 AM APPENDIX 2 BIG YEAR SNAPSHOT New Unique per per % % Country Days Total New Unique Day Day New Unique Antarctica / Falklands 8 54 54 30 7 4 100% 56% Argentina 12 435
    [Show full text]
  • Pinyon Jay Movement, Nest Site Selection, Nest Fate
    PINYON JAY MOVEMENT, NEST SITE SELECTION, NEST FATE, AND RENESTING IN CENTRAL NEW MEXICO By MICHAEL COULTER NOVAK Bachelor of Science in Zoology University of California, Santa Barbara Santa Barbara, California 2010 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December, 2019 PINYON JAY MOVEMENT, NEST SITE SELECTION, NEST FATE, AND RENESTING IN CENTRAL NEW MEXICO Thesis Approved: Dr. Loren M. Smith Thesis Adviser Dr. Scott T. McMurry Dr. Craig A. Davis ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to thank my advisor, Dr. Loren Smith, for his expert assistance guiding me through my thesis. Through his mentorship I learned to be a more effective writer and scientist. Thank you to my committee members, Dr. Scott McMurry and Dr. Craig Davis, for their valuable input on my research. Much thanks to Oklahoma State University for providing excellent academic resources and being a great place to develop professional skills required for today’s workforce. I want to thank my parents, Michael Novak and Kathleen Murphy, who have always encouraged me to work hard and be happy. I’m especially grateful for their understanding and encouragement throughout my transient career as a seasonal field biologist. Thanks, Dad, for encouraging me to find a job where they pay me to travel. Thanks, Mom, for encouraging me to pursue higher education and for keeping me on track. Thanks to my sister, Marisol Novak, for her siblingship and being a willing ear to vent my problems to. My family has always believed in me and they inspire me to continue putting one foot in front of the other, even when things are difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List
    Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List Associated Tables The Texas Priority Species List……………..733 Introduction For many years the management and conservation of wildlife species has focused on the individual animal or population of interest. Many times, directing research and conservation plans toward individual species also benefits incidental species; sometimes entire ecosystems. Unfortunately, there are times when highly focused research and conservation of particular species can also harm peripheral species and their habitats. Management that is focused on entire habitats or communities would decrease the possibility of harming those incidental species or their habitats. A holistic management approach would potentially allow species within a community to take care of themselves (Savory 1988); however, the study of particular species of concern is still necessary due to the smaller scale at which individuals are studied. Until we understand all of the parts that make up the whole can we then focus more on the habitat management approach to conservation. Species Conservation In terms of species diversity, Texas is considered the second most diverse state in the Union. Texas has the highest number of bird and reptile taxon and is second in number of plants and mammals in the United States (NatureServe 2002). There have been over 600 species of bird that have been identified within the borders of Texas and 184 known species of mammal, including marine species that inhabit Texas’ coastal waters (Schmidly 2004). It is estimated that approximately 29,000 species of insect in Texas take up residence in every conceivable habitat, including rocky outcroppings, pitcher plant bogs, and on individual species of plants (Riley in publication).
    [Show full text]
  • Inner Mongolia Cumulative Bird List Column A
    China: Inner Mongolia Cumulative Bird List Column A: total number of days that the species was recorded in 2016 Column B: maximum daily count for that particular species Column C: H = Heard only; (H) = Heard more often than seen Globally threatened species as defined by BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004 CD-Rom Cambridge, U.K. BirdLife International are identified as follows: EN = Endangered; VU = Vulnerable; NT = Near- threatened. A B C Ruddy Shelduck 2 3 Tadorna ferruginea Mandarin Duck 1 10 Aix galericulata Gadwall 2 12 Anas strepera Falcated Teal 1 4 Anas falcata Eurasian Wigeon 1 2 Anas penelope Mallard 5 40 Anas platyrhynchos Eastern Spot-billed Duck 3 12 Anas zonorhyncha Eurasian Teal 2 12 Anas crecca Baer's Pochard EN 1 4 Aythya baeri Ferruginous Pochard NT 3 49 Aythya nyroca Tufted Duck 1 1 Aythya fuligula Common Goldeneye 2 7 Bucephala clangula Hazel Grouse 4 14 Tetrastes bonasia Daurian Partridge 1 5 Perdix dauurica Brown Eared Pheasant VU 2 15 Crossoptilon mantchuricum Common Pheasant 8 10 Phasianus colchicus Little Grebe 4 60 Tachybaptus ruficollis Great Crested Grebe 3 15 Podiceps cristatus Eurasian Bittern 3 1 Botaurus stellaris Yellow Bittern 1 1 H Ixobrychus sinensis Black-crowned Night Heron 3 2 Nycticorax nycticorax Chinese Pond Heron 1 1 Ardeola bacchus Grey Heron 3 5 Ardea cinerea Great Egret 1 1 Ardea alba Little Egret 2 8 Egretta garzetta Great Cormorant 1 20 Phalacrocorax carbo Western Osprey 2 1 Pandion haliaetus Black-winged Kite 2 1 Elanus caeruleus ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ WINGS ● 1643 N. Alvernon Way Ste.
    [Show full text]