DOCSLIB.ORG

H. R. 3550 [Report No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

IB Union Calendar No. 259 108TH CONGRESS 2D SESSION H. R. 3550 [Report No. 108–452, Part I] To authorize funds for Federal-aid highways, highway safety programs, and transit programs, and for other purposes. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NOVEMBER 20, 2003 Mr. YOUNG of Alaska (for himself, Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr. PETRI, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. BOEHLERT, Mr. RAHALL, Mr. COBLE, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. COSTELLO, Mr. GILCHREST, Ms. NORTON, Mr. MICA, Mr. NADLER, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. QUINN, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Mr. EHLERS, Mr. FILNER, Mr. BACHUS, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr. TAYLOR of Mississippi, Mrs. KELLY, Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD, Mr. BAKER, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. NEY, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. LOBIONDO, Mrs. TAUSCHER, Mr. MORAN of Kansas, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California, Mr. BOS- WELL, Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. LAMPSON, Mr. HAYES, Mr. BAIRD, Mr. SIMMONS, Ms. BERKLEY, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. HONDA, Mr. BROWN of South Carolina, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, Mr. JOHNSON of Illinois, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. REHBERG, Mr. WEINER, Mr. PLATTS, Ms. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. GRAVES, Mr. HOEFFEL, Mr. KEN- NEDY of Minnesota, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. BISHOP of New York, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. MICHAUD, Mr. CHOCOLA, Mr. DAVIS of Tennessee, Mr. BEAUPREZ, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. BURNS, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. GERLACH, Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. POR- TER, Mr. MATHESON, and Mr. CARSON of Oklahoma) introduced the fol- lowing bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure MARCH 29, 2004 Reported with an amendment and referred to the Committees on Education and the Workforce, Energy and Commerce, the Judiciary, Resources, and Science, for a period ending not later than March 29, 2004, for consider- ation of such provisions of the bill and amendment as fall within the ju- risdictions of those committees pursuant to clause 1 of rule X 2 [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] MARCH 29, 2004 Additional sponsors: Mr. BERRY, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. EVANS, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. FROST, Mr. LANTOS, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. TERRY, Ms. LEE, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. GORDON, Ms. HOOLEY of Oregon, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. RUSH, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. RANGEL, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. WU, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. EMANUEL, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. DELAHUNT, Mr. MCNULTY, Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts, Mr. DAVIS of Alabama, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Mr. LUCAS of Ken- tucky, Mr. INSLEE, Mr. SANDLIN, Mr. TAUZIN, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. UPTON, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. MARKEY, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. CLAY, Mr. MEEKS of New York, Mr. MEEK of Florida, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. GON- ZALEZ, Mr. CARDOZA, Mr. BACA, Mr. DOYLE, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. ENGLISH, Mr. RUPPERSBERGER, Mr. GREEN of Texas, Mr. KAN- JORSKI, Mr. OWENS, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. ROSS, Mr. HOLT, Mr. STRICK- LAND, Mr. ORTIZ, Ms. LINDA T. SA´NCHEZ of California, Mr. WATT, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. BERMAN, Ms. PELOSI, Ms. DEGETTE, Mr. KUCINICH, and Mr. BECERRA MARCH 29, 2004 Committees on Education and the Workforce, Energy and Commerce, the Ju- diciary, Resources, and Science discharged; committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed [For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on November 20, 2003] A BILL To authorize funds for Federal-aid highways, highway safety programs, and transit programs, and for other purposes. 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- 2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE, TABLE OF CONTENTS. 4 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the 5 ‘‘Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users’’. 6 (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.— •HR 3550 RH 3 Sec. 1. Short title, table of contents. TITLE I—FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS Subtitle A—Authorization of programs Sec. 1101. Authorizations of appropriations. Sec. 1102. Obligation ceiling. Sec. 1103. Apportionments. Sec. 1104. Minimum guarantee. Sec. 1105. Project approval and oversight. Sec. 1106. Temporary traffic control devices. Sec. 1107. Revenue aligned budget authority. Sec. 1108. Emergency relief. Sec. 1109. Surface transportation program. Sec. 1110. Highway use tax evasion projects. Sec. 1111. Appalachian development highway system. Sec. 1112. Construction of ferry boats and ferry terminal facilities. Sec. 1113. Interstate maintenance discretionary. Sec. 1114. Highway bridge. Sec. 1115. Transportation and community and system preservation program. Sec. 1116. Deployment of magnetic levitation transportation projects. Sec. 1117. Recreational trails. Sec. 1118. Federal lands Highways. Sec. 1119. Reserved. Sec. 1120. Pedestrian and cyclist equity. Sec. 1121. National commissions. Sec. 1122. Adjustments for the Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2003. Sec. 1123. Roadway safety. Sec. 1124. Equity requirement. Subtitle B—Congestion relief Sec. 1201. Motor vehicle congestion relief. Sec. 1202. Transportation systems management and operations. Sec. 1203. Real-time system management information program. Sec. 1204. Expedited national intelligent transportation systems deployment pro- gram. Sec. 1205. Intelligent transportation systems deployment. Sec. 1206. Environmental review of activities that support deployment of intel- ligent transportation systems. Sec. 1207. Assumption of responsibility for certain programs and projects. Sec. 1208. HOV facilities. Sec. 1209. Congestion pricing pilot program. Subtitle C—Mobility and efficiency Sec. 1301. National corridor infrastructure improvement program. Sec. 1302. Coordinated border infrastructure program. Sec. 1303. Freight intermodal connectors. Sec. 1304. Projects of national and regional significance. Sec. 1305. Dedicated truck lanes. Sec. 1306. Truck parking facilities. Subtitle D—Highway safety Sec. 1401. Highway safety improvement program. •HR 3550 RH 4 Sec. 1402. Worker injury prevention and free flow of vehicular traffic. Sec. 1403. High risk rural road safety improvement program. Sec. 1404. Transfers of apportionments to safety programs. Sec. 1405. Safety incentive grants for use of seat belts. Sec. 1406. Safety incentives to prevent operation of motor vehicles by intoxicated persons. Sec. 1407. Repeat offenders for driving while intoxicated. Subtitle E—Construction and contract efficiencies Sec. 1501. Design–build. Sec. 1502. Warranty Highway Construction Project Pilot Program. Sec. 1503. Private investment study. Sec. 1504. Highways for LIFE pilot program. Subtitle F—Finance Sec. 1601. Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act. Sec. 1602. State infrastructure banks. Sec. 1603. Interstate System reconstruction and rehabilitation toll pilot program. Sec. 1604. Interstate System construction toll pilot program. Sec. 1605. Use of excess funds. Subtitle G—High priority projects Sec. 1701. High priority projects program. Sec. 1702. Project authorizations. Subtitle H—Miscellaneous provisions Sec. 1801. Budget justification. Sec. 1802. Motorist Information. Sec. 1803. Motorist information concerning full service restaurants. Sec. 1804. High priority corridors on the National Highway System. Sec. 1805. Additions to Appalachian region. Sec. 1806. Transportation assets and needs of Delta region. Sec. 1807. Toll facilities workplace safety study. Sec. 1808. Pavement Marking Systems Demonstration Projects. Sec. 1809. Work zone safety grants. Sec. 1810. Grant program to prohibit racial profiling. Sec. 1811. America’s Byways Resource Center. Sec. 1812. Technical adjustment. Sec. 1813. Road User Charge Evaluation Pilot Project. Sec. 1814. Sense of Congress. Sec. 1815. Conforming amendment for transportation planning sections. Sec. 1816. Distribution of metropolitan planning funds within States. Sec. 1817. Treatment of off ramp. Sec. 1818. Loan forgiveness. TITLE II—HIGHWAY SAFETY Sec. 2001. Authorization of appropriations. Sec. 2002. Occupant protection incentive grants. Sec. 2003. Alcohol-impaired driving countermeasures. Sec. 2004. State traffic safety information system improvements. Sec. 2005. High visibility enforcement program. Sec. 2006. Motorcycle crash causation study. •HR 3550 RH 5 Sec. 2007. Child safety and child booster seat incentive grants. Sec. 2008. Safety data. Sec. 2009. Motorcyclist safety. Sec. 2010. Driver fatigue. TITLE III—FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION PROGRAMS Sec. 3001. Short title; amendments to title 49, United States Code. Sec. 3002. Policies, findings, and purposes. Sec. 3003. Definitions. Sec. 3004. Metropolitan planning. Sec. 3005. Statewide planning. Sec. 3006. Planning programs. Sec. 3007. Private enterprise participation. Sec. 3008. Urbanized area formula grants. Sec. 3009. Clean fuels formula grant program. Sec. 3010. Capital investment grants. Sec. 3011. Formula grants for special needs of elderly individuals and individ- uals with disabilities. Sec. 3012. Formula grants for other than urbanized areas. Sec. 3013. Research, development, demonstration, and deployment projects. Sec. 3014. Cooperative research program. Sec. 3015. National research and technology programs. Sec. 3016. National Transit Institute. Sec. 3017. Job access and reverse commute formula grants. Sec. 3018. New Freedom program. Sec. 3019. Bus testing facility. Sec. 3020. Bicycle facilities. Sec. 3021. Transit in the parks pilot program. Sec. 3022. Human resource programs. Sec. 3023. General provisions on assistance.
Recommended publications
  • Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) 2040

    Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) 2040

    Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) 2040 4.1 Roads and Highways Element The largest part of the transportation system is a roadway network of more than 7,000 lane miles and is comprised of NCDOT maintained roads, locally maintained roads, and private roads. In late 2013 the metropolitan area boundary for the High Point MPO increased in size to include the remaining portion of Davidson County not already included in an MPO. This substantially expanded the roadway network for the MPO. Radial movements that are strongest in the MPO are: • Towards Greensboro and Jamestown to the northeast, • Towards Winston-Salem from High Point to the northwest via Interstate 74, • Towards the Piedmont Triad International Airport to the north via NC 68, • Towards Lexington from High Point to the southwest via Interstate 85 and US 29/70, and • Towards Winston-Salem from Lexington via US 52. • There is some radial demand between High Point, Thomasville, Archdale, Trinity, and Wallburg. Heavily traveled routes include: • Eastchester Drive (NC 68), towards Piedmont Triad International Airport • Westchester Drive and National Highway (NC 68), towards Thomasville • NC 109 • Main Street in High Point, • Main Street in Archdale, • US 311 Bypass, • Interstate 85, • US 29-70, • Wendover Avenue, • Main Street and NC 8 in and around Lexington, • High Point - Greensboro Road, and 4.1 Roads and Highways Element • Surrett Drive. Chapter: 1 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) 2040 The projects in the Roadway Element of the Transportation Plan come from the Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) for the High Point Urbanized Area. The differences between the Roadway Element of the MTP and the CTP include: • The MTP is required by Federal Law, CTP is mandated by the North Carolina Department of Transportation.
  • Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide

    Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide

    Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide A Complete Compendium Of RV Dump Stations Across The USA Publiished By: Covenant Publishing LLC 1201 N Orange St. Suite 7003 Wilmington, DE 19801 Copyrighted Material Copyright 2010 Covenant Publishing. All rights reserved worldwide. Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide Page 2 Contents New Mexico ............................................................... 87 New York .................................................................... 89 Introduction ................................................................. 3 North Carolina ........................................................... 91 Alabama ........................................................................ 5 North Dakota ............................................................. 93 Alaska ............................................................................ 8 Ohio ............................................................................ 95 Arizona ......................................................................... 9 Oklahoma ................................................................... 98 Arkansas ..................................................................... 13 Oregon ...................................................................... 100 California .................................................................... 15 Pennsylvania ............................................................ 104 Colorado ..................................................................... 23 Rhode Island ...........................................................
  • Civil War in the Delta: Environment, Race, and the 1863 Helena Campaign George David Schieffler University of Arkansas, Fayetteville

    Civil War in the Delta: Environment, Race, and the 1863 Helena Campaign George David Schieffler University of Arkansas, Fayetteville

    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 8-2017 Civil War in the Delta: Environment, Race, and the 1863 Helena Campaign George David Schieffler University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Schieffler, George David, "Civil War in the Delta: Environment, Race, and the 1863 Helena Campaign" (2017). Theses and Dissertations. 2426. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/2426 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Civil War in the Delta: Environment, Race, and the 1863 Helena Campaign A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History by George David Schieffler The University of the South Bachelor of Arts in History, 2003 University of Arkansas Master of Arts in History, 2005 August 2017 University of Arkansas This dissertation is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council. ____________________________________ Dr. Daniel E. Sutherland Dissertation Director ____________________________________ ____________________________________ Dr. Elliott West Dr. Patrick G. Williams Committee Member Committee Member Abstract “Civil War in the Delta” describes how the American Civil War came to Helena, Arkansas, and its Phillips County environs, and how its people—black and white, male and female, rich and poor, free and enslaved, soldier and civilian—lived that conflict from the spring of 1861 to the summer of 1863, when Union soldiers repelled a Confederate assault on the town.
  • 2020-22 GRADUATE CATALOG | Eastern New Mexico University

    2020-22 GRADUATE CATALOG | Eastern New Mexico University

    2020-22 TABLE OF CONTENTS University Notices..................................................................................................................2 About Eastern New Mexico University ...........................................................................3 About the Graduate School of ENMU ...............................................................................4 ENMU Academic Regulations And Procedures ........................................................... 5 Program Admission .............................................................................................................7 International Student Admission ...............................................................................8 Degree and Non-Degree Classification ......................................................................9 FERPA ................................................................................................................................. 10 Graduate Catalog Graduate Program Academic Regulations and Procedures ......................................................11 Thesis and Non-Thesis Plan of Study ......................................................................11 Graduation ..........................................................................................................................17 Graduate Assistantships ...............................................................................................17 Tuition and Fees ...................................................................................................................
  • BJ's Wholesale Club-30 Route 17, Blk 501, Lot 5

    BJ's Wholesale Club-30 Route 17, Blk 501, Lot 5

    STONEFIELD August 4, 2020 Borough of Paramus Planning Board 1 West Jockish Square #1 Paramus, New Jersey 07652 RE: Traffic & Parking Assessment Report Proposed Fueling Service Addition to BJ’s Wholesale Club Block 501, Lot 5 and Block 502, Lots 2.02 & 9 30 NJSH Route 17 North Borough of Paramus, Bergen County, New Jersey SE&D Job No. S-19114 Dear Board Members: Stonefield Engineering and Design, LLC (“Stonefield”) has prepared this analysis to examine the potential traffic and parking impacts of the proposed fuel service addition to the existing BJ’s Wholesale Club on the adjacent roadway network. The subject property is located along NJSH Route 17 North to the south of NJSH Route 4 in the Borough of Paramus, Bergen County, New Jersey. The subject property is designated as Block 501, Lot 5, and Block 502, Lot 9 and 2.02 as depicted on the Borough of Paramus Tax Map. The site has approximately 905 feet of frontage along the NJSH Route 17 North off-ramp to NJSH Route 4. The existing site is currently developed with a BJ’s Wholesale Club. Access is currently provided via one (1) right-turn ingress- only driveway along NJSH Route 17 North, one (1) right-turn ingress-only driveway along South Farview Avenue, and one (1) right-turn egress-only driveway along South Farview Avenue. Under the proposed development program, a fueling station with 10 fueling positions would be constructed in the southerly portion of the existing parking area. The construction of the fueling station would result in a net reduction to the overall parking supply of 103 parking spaces, and 445 parking spaces would be provided for the existing BJ’s Wholesale Club.
  • 2006 Needs Study and Highway Improvement Plan

    2006 Needs Study and Highway Improvement Plan

    2006 Arkansas State Highway Needs Study and Highway Improvement Plan ARKANSAS HIGHWAY COMMISSION Jonathan Barnett, Chairman Siloam Springs Carl S. Rosenbaum, Vice Chairman Little Rock R. Madison Murphy El Dorado John Ed Regenold Armorel Cliff Hoofman North Little Rock DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS Dan Flowers Director Frank Vozel Ralph Hall Deputy Director and Chief Engineer Assistant to the Director Scott E. Bennett Phil McConnell Allan Holmes Assistant Chief Engineer - Assistant Chief Engineer - Assistant Chief Engineer - Planning Design Operations Robert Wilson Larry Dickerson Chief Counsel Chief Fiscal Officer Alan Meadors Planning and Research Engineer Updated February 2007 2006 ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY NEEDS STUDY and HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction 1 II. National Highway System 3 III. Arkansas State Highway System 5 IV. Arkansas Primary Highway Network 9 V. Condition and Needs 11 VI. Historic Funding and Current Financial Information 25 VII. Funding Options 33 VIII. Stewardship of the System 40 IX. Public Involvement Summary 45 X. Highway Plan Development 47 XI. 2006 Highway Improvement Plan 51 Appendix – 2006 Highway Improvement Plan Project Listing ..................... 55 Addendum ....................................................................................................... 57 Fiscal Year 2006 State Revenue Sources ...........................................A-1 Shrinking Highway Dollar.....................................................................A-2 Updated February 2007 i 2006 ARKANSAS STATE
  • Arkansas Moves Toward Secession and War

    Arkansas Moves Toward Secession and War

    RICE UNIVERSITY WITH HESITANT RESOLVE: ARKANSAS MOVES TOWARD SECESSION AND WAR BY JAMES WOODS A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE MASTER OF ARTS Dr.. Frank E. Vandiver Houston, Texas ABSTRACT This work surveys the history of ante-bellum Arkansas until the passage of the Ordinance of Secession on May 6, 186i. The first three chapters deal with the social, economic, and politicai development of the state prior to 1860. Arkansas experienced difficult, yet substantial .social and economic growth during the ame-belium era; its percentage of population increase outstripped five other frontier states in similar stages of development. Its growth was nevertheless hampered by the unsettling presence of the Indian territory on its western border, which helped to prolong a lawless stage. An unreliable transportation system and a ruinous banking policy also stalled Arkansas's economic progress. On the political scene a family dynasty controlled state politics from 1830 to 186u, a'situation without parallel throughout the ante-bellum South. A major part of this work concentrates upon Arkansas's politics from 1859 to 1861. In a most important siate election in 1860, the dynasty met defeat through an open revolt from within its ranks led by a shrewd and ambitious Congressman, Thomas Hindman. Hindman turned the contest into a class conflict, portraying the dynasty's leadership as "aristocrats" and "Bourbons." Because of Hindman's support, Arkansans chose its first governor not hand¬ picked by the dynasty. By this election the people handed gubernatorial power to an ineffectual political novice during a time oi great sectional crisis.
  • Master Plan for the Borough of Montvale, Bergen County, NJ

    Master Plan for the Borough of Montvale, Bergen County, NJ

    Master Plan for the Borough of Montvale, Bergen County, NJ Prepared for the Montvale Planning Board by Phillips Preiss Shapiro Associates, Inc. Planning & Real Estate Consultants Adopted April 1, 2008 MASTER PLAN FOR THE BOROUGH OF MONTVALE BERGEN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY Prepared for The Montvale Planning Board Prepared by Phillips Preiss Shapiro Associates, Inc. Planning and Real Estate Consultants 434 Sixth Avenue New York, New York 10011 125 Half Mile Road—Suite 200 Red Bank, New Jersey 07701 Adopted April 1, 2008 Table of Contents Page CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 A. Introduction 1 B. Purpose 1 C. Brief History of Montvale 1 1. Early History 1 2. Incorporation (1894 to 1950) 3 3. 1950 to the Present 4 D. Scope of Master Plan 4 E. Context for Preparation of Master Plan 5 1. Development in Corporate Office Sector 5 2. Downtown Renaissance 6 3. Diversification of Housing Stock 6 4. Acquisition and Improvement of Public Parks and Open Space 6 5. New Community Facilities 7 CHAPTER 2. COMMUNITY RESIDENT AND BUSINESS SURVEYS 8 A. Introduction 8 B. Community Resident Survey 8 1. Purpose and Scope of Survey 8 2. Survey Results 10 C. Community Business Survey 30 1. Purpose and Scope of Survey 30 2. Results of the Survey 31 3. Analysis of the Survey Results 42 CHAPTER 3. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 44 CHAPTER 4. LAND USE 47 A. Introduction 47 B. Existing Uses 47 1. Residential 47 2. Non-Residential 52 C. Existing Zoning 56 1. Residential 58 D. Consistency of Existing Uses With Current Zoning 61 E. Montvale’s Land Use Plan 62 F.
  • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Job 100682

    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Job 100682

    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Job 100682 Future Interstate 555 Access Road Study (U.S. Highway 63) Poinsett County by U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration and Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Table of Contents Page No. PROJECT DESCRIPTION.............................................................................................. 1 PURPOSE AND NEED................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of the Project...................................................................................................................... 1 Needs Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 1 Existing Highway Conditions............................................................................................................ 5 Future Highway Conditions.............................................................................................................. 5 ALTERNATIVES............................................................................................................. 5 Alternatives Considered and Dismissed .......................................................................................... 8 Alternatives Under Consideration .................................................................................................... 8 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ............... 10 Land
  • Redbeds of the Upper Entrada Sandstone, Central Utah

    Redbeds of the Upper Entrada Sandstone, Central Utah

    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive All Theses and Dissertations 2016-12-01 Redbeds of the Upper Entrada Sandstone, Central Utah: Facies Analysis and Regional Implications of Interfingered Sabkha and Fluvial Terminal Splay Sediments Jeffery Michael Valenza Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Valenza, Jeffery Michael, "Redbeds of the Upper Entrada Sandstone, Central Utah: Facies Analysis and Regional Implications of Interfingered Sabkha and Fluvial Terminal Splay Sediments" (2016). All Theses and Dissertations. 6112. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/6112 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Redbeds of the Upper Entrada Sandstone, Central Utah: Facies Analysis and Regional Implications of Interfingered Sabkha and Fluvial Terminal Splay Sediments Jeffery Michael Valenza A thesis submitted to the faculty of Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Thomas H. Morris, Chair Jani Radebaugh Sam Hudson Scott M. Ritter Department of Geological Sciences Brigham Young University Copyright © 2016 Jeffery Michael Valenza All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Redbeds of the Upper Entrada Sandstone, Central Utah: Facies Analysis and Regional Implications of Interfingered Sabkha and Fluvial Terminal Splay Sediments Jeffery Michael Valenza Department of Geological Sciences, BYU Master of Science First distinguished from other sedimentary successions in 1928, the Entrada Sandstone has been the subject of numerous studies.
  • Official Transportation Map 15 HAZARDOUS CARGO All Hazardous Cargo (HC) and Cargo Tankers General Information Throughout Boston and Surrounding Towns

    Official Transportation Map 15 HAZARDOUS CARGO All Hazardous Cargo (HC) and Cargo Tankers General Information Throughout Boston and Surrounding Towns

    WELCOME TO MASSACHUSETTS! CONTACT INFORMATION REGIONAL TOURISM COUNCILS STATE ROAD LAWS NONRESIDENT PRIVILEGES Massachusetts grants the same privileges EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE Fire, Police, Ambulance: 911 16 to nonresidents as to Massachusetts residents. On behalf of the Commonwealth, MBTA PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 2 welcome to Massachusetts. In our MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 10 SPEED LAW Observe posted speed limits. The runs daily service on buses, trains, trolleys and ferries 14 3 great state, you can enjoy the rolling Official Transportation Map 15 HAZARDOUS CARGO All hazardous cargo (HC) and cargo tankers General Information throughout Boston and surrounding towns. Stations can be identified 13 hills of the west and in under three by a black on a white, circular sign. Pay your fare with a 9 1 are prohibited from the Boston Tunnels. hours travel east to visit our pristine MassDOT Headquarters 857-368-4636 11 reusable, rechargeable CharlieCard (plastic) or CharlieTicket 12 DRUNK DRIVING LAWS Massachusetts enforces these laws rigorously. beaches. You will find a state full (toll free) 877-623-6846 (paper) that can be purchased at over 500 fare-vending machines 1. Greater Boston 9. MetroWest 4 MOBILE ELECTRONIC DEVICE LAWS Operators cannot use any of history and rich in diversity that (TTY) 857-368-0655 located at all subway stations and Logan airport terminals. At street- 2. North of Boston 10. Johnny Appleseed Trail 5 3. Greater Merrimack Valley 11. Central Massachusetts mobile electronic device to write, send, or read an electronic opens its doors to millions of visitors www.mass.gov/massdot level stations and local bus stops you pay on board.
  • Ec-2256-Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions

    Ec-2256-Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions

    Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc. 1516 E. 26th Place Tulsa, Oklahoma 74114 USA T: (314) 565-8485 www.woodplc.com 22 July 2020 Ms. Judy Dennis, Local Governments Project Manager Ms. Rosana Marshall, Contract Administrator Oklahoma Department of Transportation 200 NE 21st Street Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105-3204 Letter of Interest Pre-Qualification for Environmental Studies Services – Non Federal Projects Contract Identification No. 2256 Dear Ms. Dennis and Ms. Marshall: Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc. (Wood) is keenly interested in providing a complete range of environmental services including National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance, natural resource assessment, and coordination and preparation of environmental surveys and associated permits for the Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT) County Transportation System. The following information is provided to demonstrate we have the necessary experience with ODOT policies and procedures; capability and experience leading transportation- related NEPA projects; expertise in environmental studies including wetland and stream (Clean Water Act Section 404) permitting, biological studies, cultural resources studies, hazardous waste studies, and all desktop analysis; and the capacity to respond to all projects. We have a long history of successfully providing similar services for departments of transportation throughout the US, Wood has also provided permitting support to ODOT under a contract to provide cultural resource services. We have included Cattails Environmental, LLC and MacArthur Associated Consultants as specialty subconsultants to our team to add local depth and experience. Cattails Environmental—an Oklahoma recognized DBE—brings specialized expertise for wetlands, streams, and endangered species found in Oklahoma. MacArthur Associated Consultants will facilitate all public involvement activities as needed.