Final Application I-555.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2006 Needs Study and Highway Improvement Plan
2006 Arkansas State Highway Needs Study and Highway Improvement Plan ARKANSAS HIGHWAY COMMISSION Jonathan Barnett, Chairman Siloam Springs Carl S. Rosenbaum, Vice Chairman Little Rock R. Madison Murphy El Dorado John Ed Regenold Armorel Cliff Hoofman North Little Rock DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS Dan Flowers Director Frank Vozel Ralph Hall Deputy Director and Chief Engineer Assistant to the Director Scott E. Bennett Phil McConnell Allan Holmes Assistant Chief Engineer - Assistant Chief Engineer - Assistant Chief Engineer - Planning Design Operations Robert Wilson Larry Dickerson Chief Counsel Chief Fiscal Officer Alan Meadors Planning and Research Engineer Updated February 2007 2006 ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY NEEDS STUDY and HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction 1 II. National Highway System 3 III. Arkansas State Highway System 5 IV. Arkansas Primary Highway Network 9 V. Condition and Needs 11 VI. Historic Funding and Current Financial Information 25 VII. Funding Options 33 VIII. Stewardship of the System 40 IX. Public Involvement Summary 45 X. Highway Plan Development 47 XI. 2006 Highway Improvement Plan 51 Appendix – 2006 Highway Improvement Plan Project Listing ..................... 55 Addendum ....................................................................................................... 57 Fiscal Year 2006 State Revenue Sources ...........................................A-1 Shrinking Highway Dollar.....................................................................A-2 Updated February 2007 i 2006 ARKANSAS STATE -
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Job 100682
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Job 100682 Future Interstate 555 Access Road Study (U.S. Highway 63) Poinsett County by U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration and Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Table of Contents Page No. PROJECT DESCRIPTION.............................................................................................. 1 PURPOSE AND NEED................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of the Project...................................................................................................................... 1 Needs Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 1 Existing Highway Conditions............................................................................................................ 5 Future Highway Conditions.............................................................................................................. 5 ALTERNATIVES............................................................................................................. 5 Alternatives Considered and Dismissed .......................................................................................... 8 Alternatives Under Consideration .................................................................................................... 8 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ............... 10 Land -
2016 ANNUAL Report
2016 ANNUAL Report ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT AHTD Mission Statement To provide a safe, efficient, aesthetically pleasing and environmentally sound intermodal transportation TABLE OF system for the user. CONTENTS 4 DIRECTOR’S MESSAGE 6 ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION 8 TOP TEN CONTRACTS OF 2016 10 CONSTRUCTION HIGHLIGHTS 14 IMPROVING OUR HIGHWAY SYSTEM 16 GROUNDBREAKINGS & RIBBON CUTTINGS 18 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT 19 IDRIVEARKANSAS AND TWITTER STATISTICS 20 RECOGNITIONS & ACCOMPLISHMENTS 22 DISTRICT INFORMATION PHOTO THIS PAGE / Highway 70 Railroad Overpass (Roosevelt Rd., Little Rock) photo by Rusty Hubbard 24 ORGANIZATION & WORKFORCE FRONT & BACK COVER PHOTOS / Highway 70 Bridge (Broadway St.) over the Arkansas River photo by Rusty Hubbard 2 3 WORK CONTINUED ON REPLACING the Broadway Bridge (U.S. HIGHWAY 70) CONNECTING Little Rock and DIRECTOR’S message North Little Rock HE ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT (AHTD) is proud to present our annual report and share the highlights and successes that the Department experienced over calendar year 2016. For the year, the Department let to contract 263 projects totaling just overT $1.2 billion. The largest of those projects was on Interstate 40 in Prairie County. In addition, work continued on replacing the Broadway Bridge (U.S. Highway 70) connecting Little Rock and North Little Rock and on improvements to Interstates 49 and 440. This report provides information on projects in all 10 of our Districts across the State. Each reflects our commitment to making our highway system one of the best in the nation as well as one of the safest. Our two major road improvement programs progressed well in 2016. -
H. R. 3550 [Report No
IB Union Calendar No. 259 108TH CONGRESS 2D SESSION H. R. 3550 [Report No. 108–452, Part I] To authorize funds for Federal-aid highways, highway safety programs, and transit programs, and for other purposes. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NOVEMBER 20, 2003 Mr. YOUNG of Alaska (for himself, Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr. PETRI, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. BOEHLERT, Mr. RAHALL, Mr. COBLE, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. COSTELLO, Mr. GILCHREST, Ms. NORTON, Mr. MICA, Mr. NADLER, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. QUINN, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Mr. EHLERS, Mr. FILNER, Mr. BACHUS, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr. TAYLOR of Mississippi, Mrs. KELLY, Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD, Mr. BAKER, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. NEY, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. LOBIONDO, Mrs. TAUSCHER, Mr. MORAN of Kansas, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California, Mr. BOS- WELL, Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. LAMPSON, Mr. HAYES, Mr. BAIRD, Mr. SIMMONS, Ms. BERKLEY, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. HONDA, Mr. BROWN of South Carolina, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, Mr. JOHNSON of Illinois, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. REHBERG, Mr. WEINER, Mr. PLATTS, Ms. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. GRAVES, Mr. HOEFFEL, Mr. KEN- NEDY of Minnesota, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. BISHOP of New York, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. MICHAUD, Mr. CHOCOLA, Mr. DAVIS of Tennessee, Mr. BEAUPREZ, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. BURNS, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. GERLACH, Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. POR- TER, Mr. MATHESON, and Mr. CARSON of Oklahoma) introduced the fol- lowing bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure MARCH 29, 2004 Reported with an amendment and referred to the Committees on Education and the Workforce, Energy and Commerce, the Judiciary, Resources, and Science, for a period ending not later than March 29, 2004, for consider- ation of such provisions of the bill and amendment as fall within the ju- risdictions of those committees pursuant to clause 1 of rule X 2 [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] MARCH 29, 2004 Additional sponsors: Mr. -
Motor Freight Carriers
onesboro LOCATION PROFILE j ARKANSAS JONESBORO P.O. Box 789 • Jonesboro, AR 72403 • 870.336-9080 • www.jonesborounlimited.com onesboro At a Glance Thank you for your interest in Jonesboro, Arkansas. Our community offers many Population advantages for you and your business. j City: 75,436 Details of those advantages are described Craighead County: 108,888 on the following pages. MSA: 133,439 U.S. Census Bureau (2017) Jonesboro is the 5th largest city in Arkansas with a population of over 75,000. Our Transportation Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) is Highways: I-555 U.S. 67, U.S. 49; State 1, over 133,000. We are centrally located 18, 141, 226, and 351 with easy access to other major markets including America’s Distribution Center, Rail: Main Line: Memphis, Tennessee. Burlington Northern/Santa Fe and Union Pacific System A well-qualified work force, low cost utilities, the training capabilities of Motor Freight Carriers: There Arkansas State University and an overall low cost of doing business are just are 42 motor freight carriers a few reasons why many companies are proud to call Jonesboro home. In servicing the Jonesboro area addition, our quality of life is exceptional with excellent healthcare, abundant retail opportunities and numerous recreational and cultural Airport Facilities: Jonesboro activities available. Jonesboro has been recognized as a City of Distinction Municipal Airport - Charter Service and Commercial Air Carrier Service for Workforce Development, and as one of the Top Ten Small Markets of to Lambert St. Louis International Airport the Decade. We have also been recognized in various publications for our provided by Air Choice One Airlines; quality education and a great entrepreneurial atmosphere. -
Speed Limit Review and Findings of Arkansas Highways
SPEED LIMIT REVIEW AND FINDINGS OF ARKANSAS HIGHWAYS DRAFT REPORT Prepared by The Arkansas Department of Transportation in accordance with Act 784 of the 92nd General Assembly Regular Session Table of Contents Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………….. 1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………. 2 Current National and Regional Speed Limits…………………………………………… 2 Speed Limits in Arkansas…………………………………………………………………. 7 Geometric Design Considerations……………………………………………………….. 9 Crash/Safety Considerations……………………………………………………………... 10 Literature Review…………………………………………………………………………... 16 Speed Trend Considerations……………………………………………………………... 20 Rural Freeways……………………………………………………………………… 20 Urban Freeways…………………………………………………………………….. 21 Rural Multi-Lane Highways………………………………………………………… 22 Other Rural Highways………………………………………………………………. 23 Findings……………………………………………………………………………………... 24 Rural Freeways……………………………………………………………………… 24 Urban Freeways…………………………………………………………………….. 24 Rural Multi-Lane Highways………………………………………………………… 24 Other Rural Highways…………...…………………………………………………. 25 Summary of Public Comments………………………………………...................…….. 26 Appendix…………………………………………………………………………………….. 29 Act 784 – To Amend the Law Concerning Maximum Speed Limits..………….. 30 Table 5 - Minute Orders Concerning Speed Limits……………………..………. 32 Literature Review Bibliography…………………………………………………….. 34 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Letter………………………….. 35 Maps………………………………………………………………………………….. 37 Executive Summary In compliance with Act 784 of the 92nd General Assembly -
Excel Export
Individual Name Emanuel Banks Joshua R. Laipply Burt Morey william j cass Email Address [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Item No. 1 - State: Arkansas Route: US 63 Jonesboro Decision Affirmative Affirmative Affirmative Affirmative Action: Elimination of a U.S.Route Between U.S. Highway 49 in the City of Brinkley and U.S. Highway 49 in the City of Comments Jonesboro Description: A shorter route exists between Brinkley, Arkansas and Jonesboro, Arkansas along existing U.S. Highway 49. Therefore, the Arkansas Department of Transportation requests the elimination of U.S. Highway 63 from the junction of U.S. Highway 49 in the City of Brinkley, Arkansas running concurrently with Interstate 40, Interstate 55, and Interstate 555 to the junction of U.S. Highway 49 in the City of Jonesboro, Arkansas. A separate request has been submitted to relocate U.S. Highway 63 to run concurrently with U.S. Highway 49 from the junction of Interstate 40 in the City of Brinkley, Arkansas to Interstate 555 in the City of Jonesboro, Arkansas. Item No. 2 - State: Arkansas Route: US 63 Jonesboro Decision Affirmative Affirmative Affirmative Affirmative Action: Relocation of a U.S. Route Between Interstate 40 in the City of Brinkley and Interstate 555 in the City of Comments Jonesboro Description: A shorter route exists between Brinkley, Arkansas and Jonesboro, Arkansas along existing U.S. Highway 49. Therefore, the Arkansas Department of Transportation requests the relocation of U.S. Highway 63 to run concurrently with U.S. Highway 49 from Interstate 40 in the City of Brinkley, Arkansas to Interstate 555 in the City of Jonesboro, Arkansas. -
Arkansas State Hichway Commission
ARKANSAS STATE HICHWAY COMMISSION THOMAS B. SCHUECK PHILIPTALDO CHAIRMAN SPRINGDALE LITTLE ROCK ROBERT S. I|OORE, JR. KEITH CIBSO\ VICE CHAIRMAN FORT SMITH ARKANSAs CITY PO. Box 2261 . Little Rock, Arkansas722A3-2261 DALTO\ Phone (501) 569-2000. Voice/TW 71 1 . Fax (501) 569-2400 A. FARtltER, JR. SCOTT E, BE}-\ETT, P.E. JONESBORO www.AnDOT. gov . www.l D riveArkansas.com DIRECTOR April 23, 2019 Mr. Jim McDonnell AASHTO Program Director for Engineering 444 North Capitol Street NW, Suite 249 Wash n, D.C. 20001 IA Dear M nnell Reference is made to the solicitation for applications for U.S. Route Numbering changes. Enclosed you will find an application requesting approval to eliminate U.S. Highway 63 between U,S Highway 49 in the City of Brinkley, Arkansas running concurrenfly with lnterstate 40, lnterstate 55, and lnterstate 555 to the junction of U.S. Highway 49 in the bity of Jonesboro, Arkansas. A request to relocate U.S. Highway 63 to run concurrenfly with U.S. Highway 49 from the junction of lnterstate 40 in the City of Brinkley, Arkanias to lnterstate 555 in the City of Jonesboro, Arkansas has been submitted in a sepaiate application. This change only affects routes in the State of Arkansas. This application has been electronically submitted to [email protected]. lf additional information is needed, please advise. S E. Bennett, P.E Director Enclosure c: Senator Tom Cotton Senator John Boozman Congressman Rick CraMord Highway Commission Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer Deputy Director and Chief Engineer Assistant Chief Engineer - Planning Federal Highway Administration American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials An Application from the State Highway or Transportation Department of Arkansas for: Elimination of a U.S. -
Multimodal Transportation Assets, Needs and Recommendations Report
Delta Regional Authority Multimodal Transportation Assets, Needs and Recommendations Report July 2008 SAFETEA–LU Section 1923 1st Edition Disclaimer: Personnel from various agencies within the U.S. Department of Transportation pro- vided information to the Delta Regional Authority during the study which led to this report. Similarly, personnel from such agencies may have made comments regarding factual assertions in various drafts of this report. However, neither the U.S. Depart- ment of Transportation nor any of its agencies necessarily endorse this report nor con- cur with any recommendation contained in the report. July 18, 2008 When Congress directed the Delta Regional Authority to prepare a report on the multimodal transportation assets and needs in our region, along with recommendations, we were delighted to take on the task. It fits perfectly into the DRA's role as a planner, coordinator of resources and advocate for the Delta. We also will prepare a strategic plan that's designed to guide the implementation of the recommendations in this report. That task also was directed by Congress in section 1923 of the 2005 national highway act. This report complements our Delta Development Highway System plan, which was released last year. When the DRA was created by Congress in 2000, one of the investment priorities outlined was the transportation infrastructure of the region. We've made numerous infrastructure investments in recent years. With the help of state departments of transportation, the Federal Highway Administration and local stakeholders, the Delta Development Highway System plan was compiled. It identified 3,843 miles of highways slated for improvements at a cost of $18.5 billion. -
Special Committee on U. S. Route Numbering 2019 Spring Meeting Report to the Council on Highways and Streets Members
1 OF 10 Special Committee on U. S. Route Numbering 2019 Spring Meeting Report to the Council on Highways and Streets Members: • Region 1 – William Cass, New Hampshire DOT • Region 2 – Emanuel Banks, Arkansas DOT (Chair) • Region 3 – Burt Morey, Kansas DOT • Region 4 – Joshua Laipply, Colorado DOT • AASHTO – Jim McDonnell • AASHTO – Patricia Ng’ethe Activities: Below are results of 33 applications (6 U.S Bike Routes, 20 U.S. Routes, 7 Interstate Routes), from 13 member departments, sent to AASHTO for review and approval. • 33 Applications Received • 25 Approved • 8 Approved Contingently • 0 Not Approved AASHTO SPRING MEETING 2019 ROUTE NUMBERING APPLICATIONS BALLOT RESULTS Item Number and Description Preliminary Comment 1 Comment 2 Decision Item No. 1 - State: Arkansas Route: US 63 Approved Jonesboro Action: Elimination of a U.S.Route Between U.S. Highway 49 in the City of Brinkley and U.S. Highway 49 in the City of Jonesboro Description: A shorter route exists between Brinkley, Arkansas and Jonesboro, Arkansas along existing U.S. Highway 49. Therefore, the Arkansas Department of Transportation requests the elimination of U.S. Highway 63 from the junction of U.S. Highway 49 in the City of Brinkley, Arkansas running concurrently with Interstate 40, Interstate 55, and Interstate 555 to the junction of U.S. Highway 49 in the City of Jonesboro, Arkansas. A separate request has been submitted to relocate U.S. Highway 63 to run concurrently with U.S. Highway 49 from the junction of Interstate 40 in the City of Brinkley, Arkansas to Interstate 555 in the City of Jonesboro, Arkansas. -
Special Committee on U. S. Route Numbering Agenda
Special Committee on U. S. Route Numbering Park City, Utah- Kokopelli Grand Ballroom - Parlor III Monday May 20, 2019 – 5:30 PM (MDT) Conference Call- Tel 1-888-585-9008, Conf. Room No. 191-374-518 Agenda 1. Call to Order .......................................................................................................... Emanuel Banks, AR 2. Roll Call and Introductions .................................................................................... Emanuel Banks, AR • Region 1 – William Cass, New Hampshire DOT • Region 2 – Emanuel Banks, Arkansas DOT (Chair) • Region 3 – Burt Morey, Kansas DOT • Region 4 – Joshua Laipply, Colorado DOT 3. Order of the Day: Ballot Number: USRN-19-01 (action) a) Ballot Results: Attachment 1 b) Applications approved prior to Spring Meeting: Attachment 2 (information) - Kentucky USBR21-Establishment - Kentucky USBR 23-Establishment - Kentucky USBR76-Realignment 4. Discussion Items: a) Bike Route Applications and Conformity with National Corridor Plan (National Corridor Plan Map: Attachment 5) ...................................................................... Caroline Kieltyka, AASHTO b) New Route Numbering Application and Review Software (Open Water Intro) c) Route Numbering and Bike Route Application Form Changes d) Update on USRN historical files digitization 5. New Business 6. Next Meeting 7. Adjourn 1 AASHTO SPRING MEETING 2019 ROUTE NUMBERING APPLICATIONS Item Number and Description Preliminary Comment 1 Comment 2 Decision Item No. 1 - State: Arkansas Route: US 63 Affirmative Jonesboro Action: Elimination of a U.S. Route Between U.S. Highway 49 in the City of Brinkley and U.S. Highway 49 in the City of Jonesboro Description: A shorter route exists between Brinkley, Arkansas and Jonesboro, Arkansas along existing U.S. Highway 49. Therefore, the Arkansas Department of Transportation requests the elimination of U.S. Highway 63 from the junction of U.S.