Large-Scale Impact 2013 /2016 POLICY PROCESSES for FINAL REPORT
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
POLICY PROCESSES FOR Large-Scale Impact 2013 / 2016 2013 / 2016 IMPACT LARGE-SCALE POLICY PROCESSES FOR POLICY FINAL REPORT 1 2 FINAL REPORT POLICY PROCESSES FOR Large-Scale Impact 2013 / 2016 PHOTOGRAPHY Cover CIAT: Neil Palmer, Georgina Smith, Stéfanie Neno and Adriana Varón. World Bank: Maria Fleischmann Rimisp Images Latin American Center for Rural Development Pages 7, 8, 10, 17, 19, 22, 24, 31, 36 and 38. CIAT Images Pages 12 and 23. Pages 4, 9, 15, 18, 39 and 45, Neil Palmer. Page 21, Stéfanie Neno and Adriana Varón. World Bank Images Pages 6 and 20, Maria Fleischmann. Page 26, Mariana Ceratti. 4 Table of contents P.07 INTRODUCTION: The Best Public Policy is Made Through Dialogue P.08 LARGE-SCALE IMPACTS: A new phase in the strategy of policy dialogue through Rural Dialogue Groups P.10 Four specific contexts and a series of common elements P.10 Cross-cutting results: the program as a platform for knowledge management and for interconnecting stakeholders for advocacy P.11 New projects that scale up policy dialogue P.11 A method for monitoring and evaluating advocacy P.12 Contribution to Changes in Policies for Over Coming Rural Poverty: P.14 Mexico: Interconnecting social and productive policies for rural development P.16 Colombia: Peace and rural development dialogues with a territorial approach P.18 Ecuador: Value chains, financing for agriculture and rural education P.20 El Salvador: Rural territorial development policies to address climate change P.22 IFAD and the incorporation of policy dialogue in Latin America P.24 INTERVIEW JOAQUÍN LOZANO: Director for Latin America and the Caribbean of the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) P.26 The Series of Latin American Poverty and Inequality Reports: P.27 Evolution of Trends P.27 Territorial Equity Index P.30 Launch and Dissemination of the 2013 and 2015 Reports P.32 TOOLS FOR SUPPORTING POLICY DIALOGUE: Communications and Publications P.32 The project’s communication strategy LARGE-SCALE IMPACT 2013 / 2016 IMPACT LARGE-SCALE P.36 Working Papers, Technical Assistance Reports and Evaluation P.40 Work Team POLICY PROCESSES FOR POLICY 5 6 Introduction “The best public policy is made through dialogue” This phrase is more than just an effec- A new way of implementing, which pro- tive message about the key approach of motes inter-institutional relationships the project whose results are presented for the implementation of integral poli- in this report. For those of us involved cies in specific territories that have their in Rimisp, the Latin American Center own development dynamics, and which for Rural Development, it reflects a deep analyzes the constraints and opportuni- conviction about the need to move ahead ties stemming from political and tech- with a new generation of public policies. nical factors, so as to achieve greater institutional coordination and inter-re- A generation of policies that can ad- lationship, with the goal of more effec- dress the growing complexity of tive and timely implementation. the social problems afflicting Latin American societies, for which our sec- This is the type of contribution that the tor-based, centralized and hierarchical RDGs in Mexico, El Salvador, Colom- states lack an appropriate response. bia and Ecuador have made, throughout their nearly six years of existence, to In this context, the main contribu- the implementation of more and better tion of the Rural Dialogue Groups public policies for overcoming rural pov- (RDGs), whose work we analyze here, erty. These contributions are analyzed has been to promote not only new pub- in this report, which we have prepared M. Ignacia Fernández G. lic policies, but also a different way of to mark the closure of a project called Executive Director thinking about, designing and imple- Policy Processes for Large-Scale Rimisp, Latin American Center for menting strategies, policies, programs Impact, financed by the Internation- Rural Development and budgets aimed at improving the al Fund for Agricultural Development quality of life of millions of Latin (IFAD), which has made it possible to Americans who live in poverty and work continuously since 2013 and 2016 vulnerable conditions in rural areas of to an initiative that began in 2010, also the Latin America. with decisive support from IFAD. A different way of thinking, which in- We hope this report serves not only to corporates multiple stakeholders from document and share concrete results, different disciplines and institution- but also to promote dialogue in general, al affiliations in a dialogue process, and the work methodology proposed by to formulate recommendations for the RDGs in particular, as an effective governments and provide technical tool for supporting processes of change support for their transformation into in public policy that lead to more inclu- concrete public policies. sive and sustainable development. A different way of designing, based on em- pirical evidence provided by assessments and analysis of policies by the RDGs, to contribute new information to discussion 2013 / 2016 IMPACT LARGE-SCALE of complex social phenomena and base recommendations on those contributions. POLICY PROCESSES FOR POLICY 7 LARGE-SCALE IMPACTS: A new phase in the strategy of policy dialogue through Rural Dialogue Groups The “Policy Processes for Large-Scale The Rural Dialogue Groups are formed As part of the project, whose results are Impact” (2013-2016) project provides within 10 and 30 influential people from presented in this report, a new element continuity to the job that is been made various sectors of government, civil so- was included to support the work of by the policy dialogue initiated by Rim- ciety, academia, private enterprise and so- the RDGs. This was a fund to support isp, the Latin American Center for Ru- cial organizations who share a common technical assistance, which would enable ral Development, as part of an earlier interest in ensuring that policies and the groups to contribute directly to the project called “Knowledge for Change in institutions create an environment bet- design of legislations drafts, new pub- Rural Poverty and Development” (2010- ter able to help the rural poor overcome lic programs or institutional redesigns 2013); both are supported with funding poverty. Each RDG defines its own work that would enable the rural population from the International Fund for Agri- agenda, taking into account the priorities to overcome poverty. In this phase, the cultural Development (IFAD). that the group considers strategic for groups were also expanded, establish- solving problems of rural poverty, but ing a more direct relationship with the The project’s purpose is to contribute paying attention to opportunities offered rural population through the inclusion to the improvement of national and by the local situation and the national de- of representative social organizations as sub-national strategies, policies and in- velopment policy agenda. active members of the RDGs. Work was vestment for overcoming rural poverty also done to develop closer collaboration in Colombia, Ecuador, El Salvador and That agenda, as well as the formation of between the RDGs and the IFAD teams Mexico. The main strategy for achiev- the central core group of members of in the country (See box: “Strengthening ing this goal has been the formation of the RDGs, date back to the end of 2010, ties with IFAD” in next page). Rural Dialogue Groups (RDGs), which when the groups conducted a series of promote policy dialogue, policy analysis studies and assessments and established and technical assistance to governments their legitimacy with the public entities for decision making. with which they would engage. During their initial years of work, the RDGs made significant contributions to na- tional public policies. 8 Large-scale Impacts, with a focus on: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO NATIONAL OR SUB-NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS Through this mechanism, the project supported governments directly with innovation processes or the redesign of policies to achieve greater impacts in overcoming rural poverty. Examples include technical assistance to the Innovation Office of the Mi- nistry of Agriculture, Livestock, Aquaculture and Fisheries (MAGAP) in Ecuador; support for Launching Territorial Innovation Systems in Boyacá, Colombia; and the Territorial Consultation of Women Cooperative members for gender mainstreaming in the Proposal for Reforms of the General Law of Cooperative Associations in El Salvador. INCLUSION IN DIALOGUE Responding to the need to include diverse territorial stakeholders, the RDGs made progress in incorporating organizations of small-scale producers and/ or representatives of civil society as active members of the RDGs. One example is the work of the El Salvador RDG in conjunction with the social platform called the “Permanent Dialogue Group of Stakeholders of Bajo Lempa” (“Mesa Permanente de Actores del Bajo Lempa,” MESPABAL) and the Women Producing on the Land Agricultural Association (Asocia- ción Agropecuaria Mujeres Produciendo en la Tierra, AMSATI de RL), or the National Forum’s activities with Farmer and Business Organizations in Mérida and Guadalajara, Mexico, respectively. STRENGTHENING TIES WITH IFAD To help strengthen IFAD’s work in each of the countries, efforts were made to promote and increase IFAD’s participation in the RDGs’ work dynamic. Specific examples of this collaboration include: in Mexico, the RDG provi- ded analysis during preparation of the new COSOP, as well as in the crea- tion of opportunities for beginning to experiment with providing technical LARGE-SCALE IMPACT 2013 / 2016 IMPACT LARGE-SCALE assistance to governments; in partnership with IFAD, Rimisp and its local partners worked on the design of a new productive inclusion program, Pro- ductive Territories. In Ecuador, the results of policy dialogue were used di- rectly in the design of the “Living Well in Rural Territories” project (loan 849-EC). In El Salvador, the RDG directly supported achievement of one objective of the “Rural Awakening” project (loan 828-SV), which consisted of more in-depth high-level dialogue.