DOCSLIB.ORG

Physical Geology Laboratory Streams, Water, and Surfaces

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Physical Geology Laboratory Streams, Water, and Surfaces StreaiTI Processes, Landscapes, Mass Wastage, and Flood Hazards CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS Pamela] .W Gore • Georgia Perimeter College Richard W Macomber • Long Island University-Brooklyn Cherukupalli E. Nehru • Brooklyn College (CUNY) OBJECTIVES AND ACTIVITIES INTRODUCTION A. Be able to use topographic maps and stereo­ It all starts with a single raindrop, then another and an­ grams to describe and interpret stream valley other. As water drenches the landscape, some soaks into shapes, channel configurations, drainage the ground and becomes groundwater. Some flows patterns, depositional features, and the evolu­ over the ground and into streams and ponds of swface tion of meanders. water. The streams will continue to flow for as long as ACTIVITY 1: Introduction to Stream they receive a water supply from additional rain, Processes and Landscapes melting snow, or base flow (groundwater that seeps ACTIVITY 2: Meander Evolution on the into a stream via porous rocks, fractures, and springs). Rio Grande Perennial streams flow continuously throughout the year and are represented on topographic maps as blue B. Understand erosional and mass wastage lines. Intermittent streams flow only at certain times of processes that occur at Niagara Falls, and be the year, such as rainy seasons or when snow melts in able to evaluate rates at which the falls is retreat­ the spring. They are represented on topographic maps ing upstream. as blue line segments separated by blue dots (three blue ACTIVITY 3: Mass Wastage at Niagara Falls dots between each line segment). All streams, perennial C. Be able to construct a flood magnitude/frequency and intermittent, have the potential to flood (overflow graph, map floods and flood hazard zones, and their banks). Floods damage more human property in assess the extent of flood hazards along the Flint the United States than any other natural hazard. River, Georgia. Streams are also the single most important ACTIVITY 4: Flood Hazard Mapping, Assess­ natural agent of land erosion (wearing away of the ment, and Risk land). They erode more sediment from the land than wind, glaciers, or ocean waves. The sediment is trans­ ported and eventually deposited, whereupon it is STUDENT MATERIALS called alluvium. Alluvium consists of gravel, sand, silt, and clay deposited in floodplains, point bars, Pencil, eraser, ruler, calculator, 12-inch length of channel bars, deltas, and alluvial fans (Figure 1). string. From Laboratory 11 of Laboratory Manual in Physical Geology, Ninth Edition, American Geological Institute, National Association of Geoscience Teachers, Richard M. Busch, Dennis Tasa. Copyright © 2011 by Pearson Education, lnc. Published by Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. 221 Stream Processes, Landscapes, Mass Wastage, and Flood Ha zards Heads of Main stream tributaries B. CHANNEL TYPES IN MAP VIEW Uplands A Tributaries X, Y ~ Boundary of Tributary X drainage A. STREAM basin (dashed line) DRAINAGE SYSTEM Yazoo tributary Marsh Point bar building to right 1 C. FLAT-BOTTOMED VALLEY WITH MEANDERING STREAM CHANNEL Channel bar D. FLAT-BOTTOMED VALLEY WITH BRAIDED CHANNELS AND SEDIMENT OVERLOAD FIGURE 1 General features of stream drainage basins, streams, and stream channels. Arrows indicate current flow in main stream channels. A. Features of a stream drainage basin. B. Stream channel types as observed in map view. C. Features of< meandering stream valley. D. Features of a typical braided stream. Braided streams develop in sediment-choked streams. 222 Stream Processes, Landscapes, Mass Wastage, and Flood Hazards Therefore, stream processes (or fluvial processes) This pattern develops on conical hills, such as are among the most important agents that shape volcanoes and some structural domes. Earth's surface and cause damage to humans and • Centripetal pattern-channels converge on a cen­ their property. tral point, often a lake or playa (dry lake bed), at the center of a closed basin (a basin from which surface water cannot drain because there is no outlet valley). PART A: STREAM PROCESSES AND LANDSCAPES • Annular pattern-a set of incomplete, concentric rings of streams connected by short radial chan­ Recall the last time you experienced a drenching rain­ nels. This pattern commonly develops on eroding storm. Where did all the water go? During drenching structural domes and folds that contain alternat­ rainstorms, some of the water seeps slowly into the ing folded layers of resistant and nonresistant ground. But most of the water flows over the ground rock types. before it can seep in. It flows over fields, streets, and sidewalks as sheets of water several millimeters or • Trellis pattern-resembles a vine or climbing rose centimeters deep. This is called sheet flow. bush growing on a trellis, where the main stream Sheet flow moves downslope in response to the is long and intersected at nearly right angles by pull of gravity, so the sheets of water flow from streets its tributaries. This pattern commonly develops and sidewalks to ditches and street gutters. From the where alternating layers of resistant and nonresis­ ditches and storm sewers, it flows downhill into small tant rocks have been tilted and eroded to form a streams. Small streams merge to form larger streams, series of parallel ridges and valleys. The main larger streams merge to form rivers, and rivers flow stream channel cuts through the ridges, and the into lakes and oceans. This entire drainage network, main tributaries flow perpendicular to the main from the smallest upland tributaries to larger streams, stream and along the valleys (parallel to and to the largest river (main stream or main river), is called between the ridges). a stream drainage system (Figure lA). • Deranged pattern-a random pattern of stream channels that seem to have no relationship to un­ Stream Drainage Patterns derlying rock types or geologic structures. Stream drainage systems form characteristic patterns Drainage Basins and Divides of drainage, depending on the relief and geology of the land. The common patterns below are illustrated The entire area of land that is drained by one stream, or in Figure 2: an entire stream drainage system, is called a drainage basin. The linear boundaries that separate one • Dendritic pattern-resembles the branching of a drainage basin from another are called divides. tree. Water flow is from the branch-like tributaries Some divides are easy to recognize on maps as to the trunk-like main stream or river. This pattern knife-edge ridge crests. However, in regions of lower is common where a stream cuts into flat lying lay­ relief or rolling hills, the divides separate one gentle ers of rock or sediment. It also develops where a slope from another and are more difficult to locate stream cuts into homogeneous rock (crystalline precisely (Figure lA, dashed line surrounding the igneous rock) or sediment (sand). Tributary X drainage basin). For this reason, divides cannot always be mapped as distinct lines. In the • Rectangular pattern-a network of channels absence of detailed elevation data, they must be rep­ with right-angle bends that form a pattern of resented by dashed lines that signify their most prob­ interconnected rectangles and squares. This able locations. pattern often develops over rocks that are You may have heard of something called a fractured or faulted in two main directions that continental divide, which is a narrow strip of land are perpendicular (at nearly right angles) and dividing surface waters that drain in opposite break the bedrock into rectangular or square directions across the continent (Figure 3). The blocks. The streams erode channels along the continental divide in North America is an imaginary perpendicular fractures and faults. line along the crest of the Rocky Mountains. Rainwa­ • Radial pattern-channel flow outward from a ter that falls east of the line drains eastward into the central area, resembling the spokes of a wheel. Atlantic Ocean, and rainwater that falls west of the Water drains from the inside of the pattern, where line drains westward into the Pacific Ocean. the "spokes" nearly meet, to the outside of the Therefore, North America's continental divide is pattern (where the "spokes" are farthest apart). sometimes called "The Great Divide." 223 Stream Processes, Landscapes, Mass Wastage, and Flood Hazards STREAM DRAINAGE PATTERNS Dendritic: Irregular pattern of channels that branch like a tree. Rectangular: Channels have right-angle bends developed along Develops on flat lying or homogeneous rock. perpendicular sets of rock fractures or joints. Radial: Channels radiate outward like spokes of a wheel from a Centripetal: Channels converge on the lowest point in a closed high point. basin from which water cannot drain. Annular: Long channels form a pattern of concentric circles Trellis: A pattern of channels resembling a vine growing on a connected by short radial channels. Develops on eroded domes trellis. Develops where tilted layers of resistant and nonresistant or folds with resistant and nonresistant rock types. rock form parallel ridges and valleys. The main stream channel cuts through the ridges, and the main tributaries flow along the valleys parallel to the ridges and at right angles to the main stream. Deranged: Channels flow randomly with no relation to underlying rock types or structures. FIGURE 2 Some stream drainage patterns and their relationship to bedrock geology. 224 FIGURE 11.3: Lake Scott, Kansas (1976) 0 .5 1 kilometer hE3E"3E3E31 'I• 'h 3067 41 r I I I --~ ~~~-~J~ ~ II II II I I' II ,; II I• __ .,1 ___ , _ , 1 II I II : / l ~ 1 II ] 0 66 •, ) \ \ _ _L ' \ _____ ! ~~30~247. ----~. J01J 1 I ( I / / I I I I I I j I )j "1 -- -- -'8.?61 1-7' --. I I 14/ I I !----·' I ' I \ - r ! I 1 I, I I I /I I I I I. I \ f. { n I i ! 'I I I lsM ("i I l j / '.}_041 I L' --~""=.---,-- --.--"""==-- ·-'~ ~ - J' 3025 1 rr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A 3D Forward Stratigraphic Model of Fluvial Meander-Bend Evolution for Prediction of Point-Bar Lithofacies Architecture
    This is a repository copy of A 3D forward stratigraphic model of fluvial meander-bend evolution for prediction of point-bar lithofacies architecture. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/116031/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Yan, N orcid.org/0000-0003-1790-5861, Mountney, NP orcid.org/0000-0002-8356-9889, Colombera, L et al. (1 more author) (2017) A 3D forward stratigraphic model of fluvial meander-bend evolution for prediction of point-bar lithofacies architecture. Computers & Geosciences, 105. pp. 65-80. ISSN 0098-3004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2017.04.012 © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Author’s Accepted Manuscript A 3D forward stratigraphic model of fluvial meander-bend evolution for prediction of point-bar lithofacies architecture Na Yan, Nigel P.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 4: Sediment Deposition and River Structures
    LESSON 4: SEDIMENT DEPOSITION AND RIVER STRUCTURES ESSENTIAL QUESTION: What combination of factors both natural and manmade is necessary for healthy river restoration and how does this enhance the sustainability of natural and human communities? GUIDING QUESTION: As rivers age and slow they deposit sediment and form sediment structures, how are sediments and sediment structures important to the river ecosystem? OVERVIEW: The focus of this lesson is the deposition and erosional effects of slow-moving water in low gradient areas. These “mature rivers” with decreasing gradient result in the settling and deposition of sediments and the formation sediment structures. The river’s fast-flowing zone, the thalweg, causes erosion of the river banks forming cliffs called cut-banks. On slower inside turns, sediment is deposited as point-bars. Where the gradient is particularly level, the river will branch into many separate channels that weave in and out, leaving gravel bar islands. Where two meanders meet, the river will straighten, leaving oxbow lakes in the former meander bends. TIME: One class period MATERIALS: . Lesson 4- Sediment Deposition and River Structures.pptx . Lesson 4a- Sediment Deposition and River Structures.pdf . StreamTable.pptx . StreamTable.pdf . Mass Wasting and Flash Floods.pptx . Mass Wasting and Flash Floods.pdf . Stream Table . Sand . Reflection Journal Pages (printable handout) . Vocabulary Notes (printable handout) PROCEDURE: 1. Review Essential Question and introduce Guiding Question. 2. Hand out first Reflection Journal page and have students take a minute to consider and respond to the questions then discuss responses and questions generated. 3. Handout and go over the Vocabulary Notes. Students will define the vocabulary words as they watch the PowerPoint Lesson.
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphic Classification of Rivers
    9.36 Geomorphic Classification of Rivers JM Buffington, U.S. Forest Service, Boise, ID, USA DR Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA Published by Elsevier Inc. 9.36.1 Introduction 730 9.36.2 Purpose of Classification 730 9.36.3 Types of Channel Classification 731 9.36.3.1 Stream Order 731 9.36.3.2 Process Domains 732 9.36.3.3 Channel Pattern 732 9.36.3.4 Channel–Floodplain Interactions 735 9.36.3.5 Bed Material and Mobility 737 9.36.3.6 Channel Units 739 9.36.3.7 Hierarchical Classifications 739 9.36.3.8 Statistical Classifications 745 9.36.4 Use and Compatibility of Channel Classifications 745 9.36.5 The Rise and Fall of Classifications: Why Are Some Channel Classifications More Used Than Others? 747 9.36.6 Future Needs and Directions 753 9.36.6.1 Standardization and Sample Size 753 9.36.6.2 Remote Sensing 754 9.36.7 Conclusion 755 Acknowledgements 756 References 756 Appendix 762 9.36.1 Introduction 9.36.2 Purpose of Classification Over the last several decades, environmental legislation and a A basic tenet in geomorphology is that ‘form implies process.’As growing awareness of historical human disturbance to rivers such, numerous geomorphic classifications have been de- worldwide (Schumm, 1977; Collins et al., 2003; Surian and veloped for landscapes (Davis, 1899), hillslopes (Varnes, 1958), Rinaldi, 2003; Nilsson et al., 2005; Chin, 2006; Walter and and rivers (Section 9.36.3). The form–process paradigm is a Merritts, 2008) have fostered unprecedented collaboration potentially powerful tool for conducting quantitative geo- among scientists, land managers, and stakeholders to better morphic investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Removal of Niagara Scenic Parkway
    OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Telephone: (716) 286-4310 June 26, 2018 The Niagara Falls City Council Niagara Falls, New York RE: Removal of the Niagara Scenic Parkway —from Main Street to Findlay Drive Council Members: An agreement has been reached between the Power Authority of the State of New York ("NYPA"), the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation ("State Parks"), the New York State Department of Transportation ("NYSDOT"), the USA Niagara Development Corporation ("USAN"), and the City of Niagara Falls (the "City"), which is the next step in the ROBERT MOSES PARKWAY NORTH SEGMENT REMOVAL PROJECT (Project). This construction project is estimated to cost $38,500,000. It is largely funded through NYPA ($36,500,000), with the balance being paid for by New York State Office of Parks Recreation and Historic Preservation ($2,000,000). No municipal capital funds are required for this Agreement to take effect. Since constructed in 1962, the former Robert Moses Parkway has not just been the subject of severe criticism but a malignancy that has decimated our community by having cut off both residents and visitors from the Niagara River, Niagara River Gorge, and the public lands connected thereto. The Parkway, rather than being the transportation link in service of economic development and city-building, instead only served to create an effective by-pass around the City and its Main Street, Pine Avenue, and other traditional business corridors. This Project, more than any before marks the largest removal, reconfiguration and regeneration of urban land since a portion of the Parkway passing through Niagara Falls State Park and Prospect Park was removed in the late 1970s.
    [Show full text]
  • Grain-Size Variability Within a Mega-Scale Point-Bar System, False River, Louisiana
    Sedimentology (2018) doi: 10.1111/sed.12528 Grain-size variability within a mega-scale point-bar system, False River, Louisiana PETER D. CLIFT*†, ELIZABETH D. OLSON*, ALEXANDRA LECHNOWSKYJ*, MARY GRACE MORAN*, ALLISON BARBATO* and JUAN M. LORENZO* *Department of Geology and Geophysics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA (E-mail: [email protected]) †Coastal Studies Institute, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA ABSTRACT Point bars formed by meandering river systems are an important class of sedimentary deposit and are of significant economic interest as hydrocar- bon reservoirs. Standard point-bar models of how the internal sedimentol- ogy varies are based on the structure of small-scale systems with little information about the largest complexes and how these might differ. Here a very large point bar (>25Á0 m thick and 7Á5 9 13Á0 km across) on the Mis- sissippi River (USA) was examined. The lithology and grain-size character- istics at different parts of the point bar were determined by using a combination of coring and electrical conductivity logging. The data confirm that there is a general fining up-section along most parts of the point bar, with a well-defined transition from massive medium-grained sands below about 9 to 11 m depth up into interbedded silts and fine–medium sand sediment (inclined heterolithic strata). There is also a poorly defined increase in sorting quality at the transition level. Massive medium sands are especially common in the region of the channel bend apex and regions upstream of that point. Downstream of the meander apex, there is much less evidence for fining up-section.
    [Show full text]
  • Stream Restoration, a Natural Channel Design
    Stream Restoration Prep8AICI by the North Carolina Stream Restonltlon Institute and North Carolina Sea Grant INC STATE UNIVERSITY I North Carolina State University and North Carolina A&T State University commit themselves to positive action to secure equal opportunity regardless of race, color, creed, national origin, religion, sex, age or disability. In addition, the two Universities welcome all persons without regard to sexual orientation. Contents Introduction to Fluvial Processes 1 Stream Assessment and Survey Procedures 2 Rosgen Stream-Classification Systems/ Channel Assessment and Validation Procedures 3 Bankfull Verification and Gage Station Analyses 4 Priority Options for Restoring Incised Streams 5 Reference Reach Survey 6 Design Procedures 7 Structures 8 Vegetation Stabilization and Riparian-Buffer Re-establishment 9 Erosion and Sediment-Control Plan 10 Flood Studies 11 Restoration Evaluation and Monitoring 12 References and Resources 13 Appendices Preface Streams and rivers serve many purposes, including water supply, The authors would like to thank the following people for reviewing wildlife habitat, energy generation, transportation and recreation. the document: A stream is a dynamic, complex system that includes not only Micky Clemmons the active channel but also the floodplain and the vegetation Rockie English, Ph.D. along its edges. A natural stream system remains stable while Chris Estes transporting a wide range of flows and sediment produced in its Angela Jessup, P.E. watershed, maintaining a state of "dynamic equilibrium." When Joseph Mickey changes to the channel, floodplain, vegetation, flow or sediment David Penrose supply significantly affect this equilibrium, the stream may Todd St. John become unstable and start adjusting toward a new equilibrium state.
    [Show full text]
  • Classifying Rivers - Three Stages of River Development
    Classifying Rivers - Three Stages of River Development River Characteristics - Sediment Transport - River Velocity - Terminology The illustrations below represent the 3 general classifications into which rivers are placed according to specific characteristics. These categories are: Youthful, Mature and Old Age. A Rejuvenated River, one with a gradient that is raised by the earth's movement, can be an old age river that returns to a Youthful State, and which repeats the cycle of stages once again. A brief overview of each stage of river development begins after the images. A list of pertinent vocabulary appears at the bottom of this document. You may wish to consult it so that you will be aware of terminology used in the descriptive text that follows. Characteristics found in the 3 Stages of River Development: L. Immoor 2006 Geoteach.com 1 Youthful River: Perhaps the most dynamic of all rivers is a Youthful River. Rafters seeking an exciting ride will surely gravitate towards a young river for their recreational thrills. Characteristically youthful rivers are found at higher elevations, in mountainous areas, where the slope of the land is steeper. Water that flows over such a landscape will flow very fast. Youthful rivers can be a tributary of a larger and older river, hundreds of miles away and, in fact, they may be close to the headwaters (the beginning) of that larger river. Upon observation of a Youthful River, here is what one might see: 1. The river flowing down a steep gradient (slope). 2. The channel is deeper than it is wide and V-shaped due to downcutting rather than lateral (side-to-side) erosion.
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Niagara Falls If You're Stuck on the American Side
    Meiqianbao/ Shutterstock Doing Niagara Falls If You're Stuck on the American Side By Jason Cochran The legendary Niagara Falls, one of the greatest natural attractions in North America, straddles the border between Ontario, Canada, and New York State. In an ideal tourism situation, you'd be able to drive or stroll across the Rainbow International Bridge to enjoy the view from both banks of the Niagara River. But sometimes you just can't get over the border. Maybe you don't have enough time. Maybe your legal status won't allow it. Or maybe you happen to be living through a once-in-a-lifetime global pandemic that has sealed national borders. It's all good! If you're restricted to the U.S. side, you won't find yourself over a barrel. There's plenty to do. In fact, some of the best activities in the Niagara Falls area are on the American side. Pictured above: Terrapin Point, at right, juts into the eastern side of the Falls from Niagara Falls State Park in New York State. Niagara Falls State Park Niagara Falls State Park If we're being honest, the Canadian side has richer options for quality lodging and tourist amenities, although the stuff on that riverbank tends toward cheesy honky-tonk. New York's territory beside the Falls, on the other hand, has been preserved from development since the 1880s. In fact, the area is now the oldest state park in the United States. The more-than-400-acre Niagara Falls State Park, which is separated from the core of town by a breakaway river, is speckled with whitewater-spanning bridges, river islands, curving walkways, and native animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Fluvial Sedimentary Patterns
    ANRV400-FL42-03 ARI 13 November 2009 11:49 Fluvial Sedimentary Patterns G. Seminara Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, University of Genova, 16145 Genova, Italy; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2010. 42:43–66 Key Words First published online as a Review in Advance on sediment transport, morphodynamics, stability, meander, dunes, bars August 17, 2009 The Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics is online at Abstract fluid.annualreviews.org Geomorphology is concerned with the shaping of Earth’s surface. A major by University of California - Berkeley on 02/08/12. For personal use only. This article’s doi: contributing mechanism is the interaction of natural fluids with the erodible 10.1146/annurev-fluid-121108-145612 Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2010.42:43-66. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org surface of Earth, which is ultimately responsible for the variety of sedi- Copyright c 2010 by Annual Reviews. mentary patterns observed in rivers, estuaries, coasts, deserts, and the deep All rights reserved submarine environment. This review focuses on fluvial patterns, both free 0066-4189/10/0115-0043$20.00 and forced. Free patterns arise spontaneously from instabilities of the liquid- solid interface in the form of interfacial waves affecting either bed elevation or channel alignment: Their peculiar feature is that they express instabilities of the boundary itself rather than flow instabilities capable of destabilizing the boundary. Forced patterns arise from external hydrologic forcing affect- ing the boundary conditions of the system. After reviewing the formulation of the problem of morphodynamics, which turns out to have the nature of a free boundary problem, I discuss systematically the hierarchy of patterns observed in river basins at different scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Inclined Heterolithic Stratification on Oil Sands
    Impact of Inclined Heterolithic Stratification on Oil Sands Reservoir Delineation and Management: An Outcrop Analog from the Late Cretaceous Horseshoe Canyon Formation, Willow Creek, Alberta Mark B. Dahl ConocoPhillips, Calgary, Alberta [email protected] Dr. John R. Suter ConocoPhillips, Calgary, Alberta [email protected] Dr. Stephen M. Hubbard University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta [email protected] Dr. Dale A. Leckie Nexen Inc., Calgary, Alberta [email protected] Inclined heterolithic strata (IHS) formed by laterally-accreting, fluvial-estuarine point-bars are economically important deposits of the lower Cretaceous McMurray Formation, which hosts the Athabasca Oil Sands (AOS) in Northern Alberta. Stratigraphic and lithologic heterogeneities occur at various scales and orientations throughout IHS, rendering interpretation and modeling of their 3-dimensional stratigraphic architecture, aimed at better estimation and extraction or resources/reserves, a serious challenge. An exceptional 3-dimensional exposure of a laterally- accreting, fluvial-estuarine point-bar deposit occurs at Willow Creek, in the Badlands of central Alberta, approximately two hours northeast of Calgary. This exposure serves as an ancient analogue to the IHS point-bar deposits commonly observed in the subsurface at the AOS (Figure 1). The Willow Creek deposits, from the Late Cretaceous Horseshoe Canyon Formation, were studied in order to better understand the stratigraphic architecture of a point-bar deposit. Figure 1. An exceptional 3-dimensional exposure of a laterally-accreting, fluvial-estuarine point-bar deposit occurs at Willow Creek. The alternating units of darker (mud-rich) and lighter (sand-rich) commonly observed in this type of deposit is known as inclined heterolithic stratification (IHS).
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Point-Bar Development Under the Influence of a Dam: Case Study on the Dráva River at Sigetec, Croatia
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL GEOGRAPHY Journal of Environmental Geography 8 (1–2), 23–30. DOI: 10.1515/jengeo-2015-0003 ISSN: 2060-467X CHARACTERISTICS OF POINT-BAR DEVELOPMENT UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF A DAM: CASE STUDY ON THE DRÁVA RIVER AT SIGETEC, CROATIA Tímea Kiss*, Márton Balogh Department of Physical Geography and Geoinformatics, University of Szeged, Egyetem u. 2-6, H-6722 Szeged, Hungary *Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Research article, received 20 February 2015, accepted 1 April 2015 Abstract Before the extensive engineering works the Dráva River had braided pattern. However in the 19-20th centuries river regulation works became widespread, thus meanders were cut off, side-channels were blocked and hydroelectric power plants were completed. These human impacts significantly changed the hydro-morphology of the river. The aim of the present research is to analyse meander development and the formation of a point-bar from the point of view of indirect human impact. Series of maps and ortho-photos representing the period of 1870-2011 were used to quantify the long- term meander development, rate of bank erosion and point-bar aggradation. Besides, at-a-site erosion measurements and grain-size analysis were also carried out. As the result of reservoir constructions during the last 145 years floods almost totally disappeared, as their return period increased to 5-15 years and their duration decreased to 1-2 days. The channel pattern had changed from braided to sinuous and to meandering, thus the rate of bank erosion increased from 3.7 m/y to 32 m/y. On the upstream part of the point-bar the maximum grain size is 49.7–83.4 mm and the mean particle size is 7.6 mm, whilst on the downstream part the maximum grain size was only 39.7–39.9 mm and mean sediment size decreased to 6.1 mm.
    [Show full text]
  • What Drives Scroll-Bar Formation in Meandering River?', Geology., 42 (4)
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 26 May 2015 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: van de Lageweg, W.I. and van Dijk, W.M. and Baar, A.W. and Rutten, J. and Kleinhans, M.G. (2014) 'Bank pull or bar push : what drives scroll-bar formation in meandering river?', Geology., 42 (4). pp. 319-322. Further information on publisher's website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/G35192.1 Publisher's copyright statement: Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk Scroll-bar formation in meandering rivers. (2014) • Geology 42, 319–322 Bank pull or bar push: what drives scroll-bar formation in meandering rivers? W.I. van de Lageweg, W.M. van Dijk, A.W. Baar, J. Rutten, and M.G. Kleinhans Faculty of Geosciences, Department of Physical Geography, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
    [Show full text]