DOCSLIB.ORG

Advanced Computer Networks Cs 538 Fall 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Advanced Computer Networks Cs 538 Fall 2011 Advanced Computer Networks cs 538 fall 2011 Brighten Godfrey [email protected] Fall 2011 slides ©2010-2011 by Brighten Godfrey except photographs (from Computer History Museum) and unless otherwise noted To d ay Course Overview Internet History Your Future This course • is instructed by Brighten Godfrey ([email protected], 3128 Siebel) • takes place Tue & Thu, 3:30 - 4:45 pm, in 1302 Siebel • comes with FREE office hours: currently, Tuesdays after class and by appointment • has a web site: http://www.cs.illinois.edu/~pbg/ courses/cs538fa11/ Your instructor • Ph.D. from UC Berkeley, 2009 • Dissertation on improving resilience and performance of distributed systems by taking advantage of heterogeneity • Research interests: • Reliable, flexible, and efficient networked systems • Algorithms for and analysis of distributed systems Course goal • Prepare ourselves to perform high-quality research advancing the field of networking Course components • Networking literature • The classics • The challenges • The latest • Research project • How to read, criticize, and present research Major topics • Core architecture • Classic Internet architecture • Congestion control • Forwarding • Routing • Naming • Making it work well • Reliability, scalability, selfishness, security • Domain-specific networks • Enterprise, data center, P2P, wireless Requirements & grading • Project (45%) • Midterm presentation (10%) • Final paper (20%) • Final poster presentation (15%) • Assignments, quizzes (15%) • Paper reviews (15%) • Paper presentations (15%) • Class participation (10%) 1. Project • Research project that could be developed into a conference submission • Work alone or in groups of two • Project topics • Explore your own ideas • Next lecture: some suggestions • Steps • Project proposal (3 weeks from now) • Midterm presentation • Final poster presentation and paper 2. Readings • Generally one or two papers per lecture • Submit a review on the wiki by 11:59pm the night before we discuss the paper • For each paper, a review is • At least 2 comments • About one paragraph (longer is not better) • Don’t just repeat what we already read in the paper! 3. Topic presentations • 20 minute presentation on one topic in the course • 10 minutes of “depth” on one paper, including key concepts, techniques, results, and your criticism • 10 minutes of “breadth” comparing to 2-3 other papers and the required reading • 20 minutes of discussion during/after • At least 2 days before it happens, meet with me to show me your presentation 4. Assignments • 2-3 homeworks or quizzes during the semester 5. Class participation • Comment, question, and interact! • Discuss on the course wiki To d ay Course Overview Internet History Your Future Visions • Vannevar Bush, “As we may think” (1945): memex • J. C. R. Licklider (1962): “Galactic Network” • Concept of a global network of computers connecting people with data and programs Bush • First head of DARPA computer research, Licklider October 1962 Circuit switching 1920s 1967 [Getty Images] [US Air Force] 1961-64: Packet switching Datagram packet Circuit Switching switching Physical channel carrying stream of Message broken into short packets, data from source to destination each handled separately Three phase: setup, data transfer, One operation: send packet tear-down Packets stored (queued) in each Data transfer involves no routing router, forwarded to appropriate neighbor 1961-64: Packet switching • Leonard Kleinrock: queueing-theoretic analysis of packet switching in MIT Ph.D. thesis (1961-63) demonstrated value of statistical multiplexing • Concurrent work from Paul Baran (RAND), Donald Davies (National Kleinrock Physical Labratories, UK) Circuit switching Packet switching: multiplexed Time Time Baran 1965: First computer network • Lawrence Roberts and Thomas Merrill connect a TX-2 at MIT to a Q-32 in Santa Monica, CA • ARPA-funded project • Connected with telephone line – it works, but it’s inefficient and expensive – confirming motivation for packet switching Roberts The ARPANET begins • Roberts joins DARPA (1966), publishes plan for the ARPANET computer network (1967) • December 1968: Bolt, Beranek, and Newman (BBN) wins bid to build packet switch, the Interface Message Processor • September 1969: BBN delivers first IMP to Kleinrock’s lab at UCLA An older Kleinrock with the first IMP ARPANET comes alive Stanford Research Institute (SRI) “LO” Oct 29, 1969 UCLA ARPANET grows • Dec 1970: ARPANET Network Control Protocol (NCP) • 1971: Telnet, FTP • 1972: Email (Ray Tomlinson, BBN) • 1979: USENET ARPANET, April 1971 ARPANET grows ARPANET to Internet • Meanwhile, other networks such as PRnet, SATNET deveoped • May 1973: Vinton G. Cerf and Robert E. Kahn present first paper on interconnecting networks • Concept of connecting diverse networks, unreliable datagrams, global addressing, ... Cerf • Became TCP/IP Kahn TCP/IP deployment • TCP/IP implemented on mainframes by groups at Stanford, BBN, UCL • David Clark implements it on Xerox Application Alto and IBM PC Presentation • 1982: International Organization for Session Standards (ISO) releases Open Transport Systems Interconnection (OSI) Network reference model Data Link • Design by committee didn’t win Physical • January 1, 1983: “Flag Day” NCP to OSI Reference TCP/IP transition on ARPANET Model’s layers Growth from Ethernet • Ethernet: R. Metcalfe and D. Boggs, July 1976 • Spanning Tree protocol: Radia Perlman, 1985 • Made local area networking easy Metcalfe Perlman Growth spurs organic change • Early 1980s: Many new networks: CSNET, BITNET, MFENet, SPAN (NASA), ... Mockapetris • Nov 1983: DNS developed by Jon Postel, Paul Mockapetris (USC/ISI), Craig Partridge (BBN) Postel • 1984: Hierarchical routing: EGP and IGP (later to become eBGP and iBGP) Partridge NSFNET • 1984: NSFNET for US higher education NSFNET backbone, 1992 • Serve many users, not just one field • Encourage development of private infrastructure (e.g., backbone required to be used for Research and Education) • Stimulated investment in commercial long-haul networks • 1990: ARPANET ends • 1995: NSFNET decommissioned Explosive growth! In hosts Explosive growth! In networks (Colors correspond to measurements from different vantage points) Internet forwarding table size table Internet forwarding Year [Huston ’10] n g J g a a k p k o o a k r B r , e t e , T i a T j , S H i a n I G D i g 0E p , 10 V e C l S i E a , N 10 e T 1 d o iv u W o l A , E s K 0 I to 12 k R , S R U A E 0 T 3 ok 1 y o, JP A E 0 I 4 1 S N yd ne y A , A E U 0 5 1 E [Huffaker, claffy, Hyun, Luckie, C Lyu, CAIDA] E O 0 IPv4 & IPv6 INTERNET TOPOLOGY MAP JANUARY 2009 B AS-level INTERNET GRAPH S i a n n g J g a a k p N k o I o N a k , r I B r , y e , t e T i a a , i h b T j , S H i l G a n I e m D i g 90E o p 0E D , 10 80E E V e C B A l S i E a , N 10 , e T 1 70 i d o E b iv u W a o l A h s , E t K 20 I D o 1 R 60 k S E u , b R A U A E T 0 3 o 1 5 k 0 y E o, U J A R P , E w 0 I o L 4 c I s , 1 4 o v 0 i R E M v T N A a, Sy el r d T ka A ne n U A y A A , Z , A ev , U E i ia 0 r 5 K o 1 t I E 3 re F 0 P i, E k A sin G E el B C H a, ofi , PL F S saw U r E a E O S 0 W m, 6 4755(TATACOMM) ol 1 R h 38809(NXGNET) 2 ck T 0 o A R t , 39049304 (Hutchison) E S na Vien 7575(AARNET) I , DE O lin 8395(COMSTAR) Ber C O E 10026(Asia Netcom) o, N 0 Osl 7 P t, DE 1 kfur 1 Fran 2516(KDDI) 0 A 20485(JSC) E E Brussels, BE W Paris, FR / E 7714(TelstraClear) 3320(Deutsche Telekom) 0 8928(Interoute) 8 London, UK 1 0 702(MCI) 1299(TeliaNet) 1273(CW) 3356(Level 3) 5459(London IX) 3549(Global Crossing) Dublin, IE W 0 701(UUNET) 12989(HWNG) Alge 7 1239(Sprint) s, PT 1 1 0 2914(NTT) W 2828(XOXO) 6677(ICENET) 3561(Savvis) W 0 4320(Embratel) 6 1 2 0 7843(Road Runner) W S 577(Bell Canada) , U u lul ono H W 0 5 1 3 0 W W 0 4 1 4 0 W S O R U i W o 0 3 1 d 5 T 0 e W J H a n ei W r A 0 2 o A 1 B 6 , 0 M W u B C S E e R [Huffaker, claffy, N I U R n O W 0 o I , 1 R 1 S 7 0 R C s e W E T s A M B U H A A o S W O , 0 0 1 8 o 0 i J W W o S r W 0 U 9 t s T e n g S t t , U C s a e a a o o , i x , S i U s w n h r A Hyun, Luckie, h D , n n o , i a i R r o e c n U n n , e t o a a s t g v C S g o S h t u n o A P o , o e n , C , D H U A U Lyu, CAIDA] S S Explosive growth! In complexity Autonomous System BGP router IP router Routing protocols LAN LAN eBGP, iBGP switch ethernet MPLS, CSPF,..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Digital Technical Journal, Number 3, September 1986: Networking
    Netwo;king Products Digital TechnicalJournal Digital Equipment Corporation Number 3 September I 986 Contents 8 Foreword William R. Johnson, Jr. New Products 10 Digital Network Architecture Overview Anthony G. Lauck, David R. Oran, and Radia J. Perlman 2 5 PerformanceAn alysis andModeling of Digital's Networking Architecture Raj Jain and William R. Hawe 35 The DECnetjSNA Gateway Product-A Case Study in Cross Vendor Networking John P:.. �orency, David Poner, Richard P. Pitkin, and David R. Oran ._ 54 The Extended Local Area Network Architecture and LANBridge 100 William R. Hawe, Mark F. Kempf, and Alan). Kirby 7 3 Terminal Servers on Ethernet Local Area Networks Bruce E. Mann, Colin Strutt, and Mark F. Kempf 88 The DECnet-VAXProduct -A n IntegratedAp proach to Networking Paul R. Beck and James A. Krycka 100 The DECnet-ULTRIXSoftware John Forecast, James L. Jackson, and Jeffrey A. Schriesheim 108 The DECnet-DOS System Peter 0. Mierswa, David). Mitton, and Ma�ha L. Spence 117 The Evolution of Network Management Products Nancy R. La Pelle, Mark). Seger, and Mark W. Sylor 129 The NMCCjDECnet Monitor Design Mark W. Sylor 1 Editor's Introduction The paper by Bill Hawe, Mark Kempf, and AI Kirby reports how studies of potential new broad­ band products led to the development of the Extended LAN Architecture. The design of the LANBridge 100, the first product incorporating that architecture, is described, along with the trade-offs made to achieve high performance. The speed of communication between terminals and systems depends on how they are connected. Bruce Mann, Colin Strutt, and Mark Kempf explain how they developed the LAT protocol to connect terminals to hosts on an Ethernet.
    [Show full text]
  • Harvard University
    HARVARD UNIVERSITY ROBERT AND RENÉE BELFER CENTER FOR SCIENCE AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS 2000-2001 ANNUAL REPORT 2 Robert and Renée Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs 2000-2001 Annual Report Director’s Foreword 5 Overview From the Executive Director 7 Environment and Natural Resources Program TABLE 8 OF Harvard Information Infrastructure Project 52 CONTENTS International Security Program 71 Science, Technology and Public Policy Program 109 Strengthening Democratic Institutions Project 155 WPF Program on Intrastate Conflict, Conflict Prevention, and Conflict Resolution 177 Events 188 Publications 219 Biographies 241 Robert and Renée Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs 3 2000-2001 Annual Report 4 Robert and Renée Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs 2000-2001 Annual Report Director’s Foreword —————————————♦ For the hub of the John F. Kennedy School’s research, teaching, and training in international security affairs, environmental and resource issues, conflict prevention and resolution, and science and technology policy, the first academic year of the new century has been bracing. According to our mission statement, The Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs strives to provide leadership in advancing policy-relevant knowledge about the most important challenges of international security and other critical issues where science, technology, and international affairs intersect. BCSIA’s leadership begins with the recognition of science and technology as driving forces transforming threats and opportunities in international affairs. The Center integrates insights of social scientists, technologists, and practitioners with experience in government, diplomacy, the military, and business to address critical issues. BCSIA involvement in both the Republican and Democratic campaigns. BCSIA was privileged to have senior advisors in both camps in one of the most unforgettable American elections in recent memory.
    [Show full text]
  • Thoughts About Network Protocols and the Internet
    Thoughts about Network Protocols and the Internet Radia Perlman Dell EMC [email protected] 1 Most important point I’ll make 2 Most important point I’ll make • Not everything you read, or hear is true 3 How networking tends to be taught • Memorize these standards documents, or the arcane details of some implementation that got deployed • Nothing else ever existed • Except possibly to make vague, nontechnical, snide comments about other stuff 4 My philosophy on teaching (and books) • Look at each conceptual problem, like how to autoconfigure an address • Talk about a bunch of approaches to that, with tradeoffs • Then mention how various protocols (e.g., IPv4, IPv6, Appletalk, IPX, DECnet, …) solve it 5 But some professors say… • Why is there stuff in here that my students don’t “need to know”? 6 Where does confusion come from? • Hype • People repeating stuff • Buzzwords with no clear definition – Or persons A and B have a clear definition in mind, but different from each other • Or the world changing, so something that used to be true is no longer true 7 Things are so confusing • Comparing technology A vs B – Nobody knows both of them – Somebody mumbles some vague marketing thing, and everyone repeats it – Both A and B are moving targets 8 Standards Bodies… 9 What about “facts”? • What if you measure A vs B? 10 What about “facts”? • What if you measure A vs B? • What are you actually measuring?...one implementation of A vs one implementation of B 11 What about “facts”? • What if you measure A vs B? • What are you actually measuring?...one
    [Show full text]
  • Myths, Missteps, and Folklore in Protocol Design
    Sun Laboratories 2000-0058 Myths, Missteps, and Folklore in Protocol Design Radia Perlman Sun Labs, East Coast [email protected] 1 Radia Perlman Sun Laboratories 2000-0058 Outline • Bridges, Routers, and Switches, Oh My! • What’s with IP Multicast? • What’s with IPv6? • ARPANET flooding • BGP • Compatible Parameters • Forward Compatibility • How not to get any advantage from a public key system 2 Radia Perlman Sun Laboratories 2000-0058 Why This Talk? • Learn from mistakes • Understand oddities in today’s protocols • Counteract “religion” aspect “It’s not what you don’t know that’ll get you. It’s what you do know that ain’t true” ..............Mark Twain • Be provocative. Start lively discussion. 3 Radia Perlman Sun Laboratories 2000-0058 Bridges and Routers and Switches, Oh My! • ISO’s OSI Reference Model - layer 1: physical - layer 2: neighbor-neighbor - layer 3: talk across cloud via a multi-hop path - layer 4: end-to-end - layer 5 and above: boring • Repeater: layer 1 relay • Bridge: layer 2 relay • Router: layer 3 relay • OK. Why is there such a thing as a layer 2 relay? 4 Radia Perlman Sun Laboratories 2000-0058 Definition of Layer 2 Protocol: Anything defined by a committee whose charter is to standardize a layer 2 protocol. What does a (connectionless) layer 3 protocol look like? • put “envelope” on your data that includes destination, source address and hop count • Layer 3 addresses usually hierarchical location node • With point-to-point links, only need one set of addresses: ultimate source, and ultimate destination • With multi-access links like Ethernet, need “next hop” also 5 Radia Perlman Sun Laboratories 2000-0058 Ethernet • Need “next hop” address in addition to ultimate destination A δ φ R1β R2 R3 α ε S π D layer 2 layer 3 α src= src=S data dst=β dst=D δ src= src=S data dst=φ dst=D ε src= src=S data dst=π dst=D • Also required rethinking routing algorithm (e.g., Designated Routers, pseudonodes) 6 Radia Perlman Sun Laboratories 2000-0058 What are Bridges? • Myth: Bridges were invented before routers.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Internet Pioneers
    List of Internet pioneers Instead of a single "inventor", the Internet was developed by many people over many years. The following are some Internet pioneers who contributed to its early development. These include early theoretical foundations, specifying original protocols, and expansion beyond a research tool to wide deployment. The pioneers Contents Claude Shannon The pioneers Claude Shannon Claude Shannon (1916–2001) called the "father of modern information Vannevar Bush theory", published "A Mathematical Theory of Communication" in J. C. R. Licklider 1948. His paper gave a formal way of studying communication channels. It established fundamental limits on the efficiency of Paul Baran communication over noisy channels, and presented the challenge of Donald Davies finding families of codes to achieve capacity.[1] Charles M. Herzfeld Bob Taylor Vannevar Bush Larry Roberts Leonard Kleinrock Vannevar Bush (1890–1974) helped to establish a partnership between Bob Kahn U.S. military, university research, and independent think tanks. He was Douglas Engelbart appointed Chairman of the National Defense Research Committee in Elizabeth Feinler 1940 by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, appointed Director of the Louis Pouzin Office of Scientific Research and Development in 1941, and from 1946 John Klensin to 1947, he served as chairman of the Joint Research and Development Vint Cerf Board. Out of this would come DARPA, which in turn would lead to the ARPANET Project.[2] His July 1945 Atlantic Monthly article "As We Yogen Dalal May Think" proposed Memex, a theoretical proto-hypertext computer Peter Kirstein system in which an individual compresses and stores all of their books, Steve Crocker records, and communications, which is then mechanized so that it may Jon Postel [3] be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 9: Networks to Internetworks
    Lecture 9: Networks to Internetworks CSE 123: Computer Networks Aaron Schulman HW 1 due today Lecture 9 Overview ! Bridging & switching (cont.) u Spanning Tree ! Internetworking u Routing u Internet Protocol CSE 123 – Lecture 8: From networks to Internetworks 2 Spanning Tree A ! Spanning tree uses B subset of bridges so B3 there are no cycles C B5 u Prune some ports D B7 B2 K u Only one tree E F B1 ! Q: How do we find a spanning tree? G H u Automatically! B6 B4 u Elect root, find paths I J CSE 123 – Lecture 9: From networks to Internetworks 3 Spanning Tree Algorithm ! Each bridge sends periodic configuration messages u (RootID, Distance to Root, BridgeID) u All nodes think they are root initially ! Each bridge updates route/Root upon receipt u Smaller root address is better u Select port with lowest cost to root as “root port” u To break ties, bridge with smaller address is better ! Rebroadcast new config to ports for which we’re “best” u Don’t bother sending config to LANs with better options u Add 1 to distance, send new configs on ports that haven’t told us about a shorter path to the root ! Only forward packets on ports for which we’re on the shortest path to root (prunes edges to form tree) CSE 123 – Lecture 9: From networks to Internetworks 4 Spanning Tree Example ! Sample messages to and from B3: A B B3 1. B3 sends (B3, 0, B3) to B2 [LAN C] and B5 [LAN A] C B5 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Computer Networking: a Top-Down Approach, 7Th Edition
    Computer Networking A Top-Down Approach Seventh Edition James F. Kurose University of Massachusetts, Amherst Keith W. Ross NYU and NYU Shanghai Boston Columbus Indianapolis New York San Francisco Hoboken Amsterdam Cape Town Dubai London Madrid Milan Munich Paris Montréal Toronto Delhi Mexico City São Paulo Sydney Hong Kong Seoul Singapore Taipei Tokyo Vice President, Editorial Director, ECS: Marcia Horton Acquisitions Editor: Matt Goldstein Editorial Assistant: Kristy Alaura Vice President of Marketing: Christy Lesko Director of Field Marketing: Tim Galligan Product Marketing Manager: Bram Van Kempen Field Marketing Manager: Demetrius Hall Marketing Assistant: Jon Bryant Director of Product Management: Erin Gregg Team Lead, Program and Project Management: Scott Disanno Program Manager: Joanne Manning and Carole Snyder Project Manager: Katrina Ostler, Ostler Editorial, Inc. Senior Specialist, Program Planning and Support: Maura Zaldivar-Garcia Cover Designer: Joyce Wells Manager, Rights and Permissions: Ben Ferrini Project Manager, Rights and Permissions: Jenny Hoffman, Aptara Corporation Inventory Manager: Ann Lam Cover Image: Marc Gutierrez/Getty Images Media Project Manager: Steve Wright Composition: Cenveo Publishing Services Printer/Binder: Edwards Brothers Malloy Cover and Insert Printer: Phoenix Color/ Hagerstown Credits and acknowledgments borrowed from other sources and reproduced, with ­permission, in this textbook appear on appropriate page within text. Copyright © 2017, 2013, 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Manufactured in the United States of America. This publication is protected by Copyright, and permission should be obtained from the publisher prior to any prohibited reproduction, storage in a retrieval system, or transmission in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or likewise. For information regarding permissions, request forms and the appropriate contacts within the Pearson Education Global Rights & Permissions Department, please visit www.pearsoned.com/permissions/.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to TRILL by Radia Perlman, Intel Labs, and Donald Eastlake, Huawei Technologies
    September 2011 Volume 14, Number 3 A Quarterly Technical Publication for From The Editor Internet and Intranet Professionals I recently attended a conference in Japan where the attendee network offered IPv6 service only. In the past, conferences such as the Asia In This Issue Pacific Regional Conference on Operational Technologies (APRICOT) and meetings of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) have conducted IPv6 experiments, but these have all been “opt-in” events. From the Editor ...................... 1 The conference in Japan was different: there was no IPv4 service available. Making this work involved a few manual configuration TRILL ..................................... 2 steps, but for the most part everything worked more or less the same as it did under IPv4. Some applications, including my instant message client and Skype did not work, and all connections to IPv4-only hosts IP Backhaul ........................... 21 needed to use Fully Qualified Domain Names (FQDNs) instead of IP addresses, but overall the experience gave me confidence that IPv6 is becoming a reality. As you might expect, this IPv6-only experiment Fragments ............................. 30 also uncovered a number of bugs and incompatibilities that were duly reported to developers around the world. Call for Papers ...................... 31 Our first article is an overview of TRansparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL). TRILL uses Layer 3 routing techniques to create a large cloud of links that appear to IP nodes to be a single IP subnet. The protocol has been developed in the IETF and is currently being refined and enhanced in the TRILL working group. The article is by Radia Perlman and Donald Eastlake.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles of Computer System Design an Introduction
    Principles of Computer System Design An Introduction Suggestions for Further Reading Jerome H. Saltzer M. Frans Kaashoek Massachusetts Institute of Technology Version 5.0 Saltzer & Kaashoek Ch. 11, p. i June 24, 2009 12:32 am Copyright © 2009 by Jerome H. Saltzer and M. Frans Kaashoek. Some Rights Reserved. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non­ commercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. For more information on what this license means, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trade­ marks or registered trademarks. In all instances in which the authors are aware of a claim, the product names appear in initial capital or all capital letters. All trademarks that appear or are otherwise referred to in this work belong to their respective owners. Suggestions, Comments, Corrections, and Requests to waive license restrictions: Please send correspondence by electronic mail to: [email protected] and [email protected] Saltzer & Kaashoek Ch. 11, p. ii June 24, 2009 12:32 am Suggestions for Further Reading CHAPTER TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction................................................................................... SR–2 1 Systems ..................................................................................... SR–4 1.1 Wonderful books about systems ............................................... SR–4 1.2 Really good books about systems. ............................................ SR–6 1.3 Good books on related
    [Show full text]
  • Antonio Tajani MEP President of the European Parliament [email protected]
    Antonio Tajani MEP President of the European Parliament [email protected] 12 June 2018 Mr President, Article 13 of the EU Copyright Directive Threatens the Internet As a group of the Internet’s original architects and pioneers and their successors, we write to you as a matter of urgency about an imminent threat to the future of this global network. The European Commission’s proposal for Article 13 of the proposed Directive for Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive was well-intended. As creators ourselves, we share the concern that there should be a fair distribution of revenues from the online use of copyright works, that benefits creators, publishers, and platforms alike. But Article 13 is not the right way to achieve this. By requiring Internet platforms to perform automatic filtering all of the content that their users upload, Article 13 takes an unprecedented step towards the transformation of the Internet from an open platform for sharing and innovation, into a tool for the automated surveillance and control of its users. Europe has been served well by the balanced liability model established under the Ecommerce Directive, under which those who upload content to the Internet bear the principal responsibility for its legality, while platforms are responsible to take action to remove such content once its illegality has been brought to their attention. By inverting this liability model and essentially making platforms directly responsible for ensuring the legality of content in the first instance, the business models and investments of platforms large and small will be impacted. The damage that this may do to the free and open Internet as we know it is hard to predict, but in our opinions could be substantial.
    [Show full text]
  • Helping a Future Internet Architecture Mature Craig Partridge Raytheon BBN Technologies [email protected]
    Helping A Future Internet Architecture Mature Craig Partridge Raytheon BBN Technologies [email protected] This article is an editorial note submitted to CCR. It has NOT been peer reviewed. The author takes full responsibility for this article’s technical content. Comments can be posted through CCR Online. ABSTRACT impact beyond the research community. I’m interested in helping Some of the challenges of developing and maturing a future good architecture ideas reach the development, implementation internet architecture (FIA) are described. Based on a talk given and product communities, as so many of those 1970s and 1980s at the Conference on Future Internet Technologies 2013. architectures did. This editorial is not about winning a protocol war. One of the Categories and Subject Descriptors characteristics of the 1980s was that the networking community understood how to borrow/import/steal good architectural ideas C.2.1 [Network Architecture and Design]. from each other’s architectures. That borrowing is important intellectual cross-fertilization, and requires architectures to be Keywords mature enough that they are worth borrowing from. Helping Network architecture, future internet architecture. today’s future Internet architectures reach that level of maturity is the goal of this paper. 1. INTRODUCTION The successful Future Internet Architecture (FIA) research 3. SIX PRINCIPLES initiatives in Asia, Europe and the United States have led to To help mature a future Internet architecture, I offer six principles. multiple proposed new Internet architectures. The maturity of these architectures varies widely. Some efforts are still refining 3.1 Stick to Your Vision their initial visions while others have working prototypes.
    [Show full text]
  • Signposts in Cyberspace: the Domain Name System and Internet Navigation
    Prepublication Copy—Subject to Further Editorial Correction Signposts in Cyberspace: The Domain Name System and Internet Navigation Committee on Internet Navigation and the Domain Name System: Technical Alternatives and Policy Implications Computer Science and Telecommunications Board Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS Washington, D.C. www.nap.edu Prepublication Copy—Subject to Further Editorial Correction THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. Support for this project was provided by the U.S. Department of Commerce and the National Science Foundation under Grant No. ANI-9909852 and by the National Research Council. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation or the Commerce Department. International Standard Book Number Cover designed by Jennifer M. Bishop. Copies of this report are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, N.W., Lockbox 285, Washington, D.C. 20055, (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313 in the Washington metropolitan area. Internet, http://www.nap.edu Copyright 2005 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America Prepublication Copy—Subject to Further Editorial Correction The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare.
    [Show full text]