DOCSLIB.ORG

Journal of the Continental Congress Excerpts Related to the Post Office Rev

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Journal of the Continental Congress Excerpts Related to the Post Office Rev Journal of the Continental Congress Excerpts Related to the Post Office Rev. 1 (1-2011) The Journals of the Continental Congress are the records of the daily proceedings of the Congress as kept by the office of its secretary, Charles Thomson. All Acts, Resolves and other information relating to the running of the Government are contained within its pages or references. The Journals were transcribed and published by the Library of Congress in 34 volumes issued from 1904 to 1937. About 25 years ago, I spent about a week at the Library of Congress making photocopies of anything relating to Post Office operations. These have been invaluable in understanding how the Post Office functioned from 1775 until 1792. These Journals have now been digitized and are available on the Library of Congress website at: http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/amlaw/lwjc.html This file includes the transcipts of those records relating to the Post Office that I've found to date. I'm continuing to add to this file, so it should be considered a work in progress. Entries marked with {Rev1} were added during that revision. Ed Siskin Voorhees, NJ [email protected] New Jersey Postal History Society www.NJPostalHistory.org 1 Free Digital File Journal of the Continental Congress 1774-1789 Excerpts Related to the Post Office WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 5, 1774, A.M. An address from William Goddard to the Congress was read and lie on the table. 1 MONDAY, MAY 29, 1775 As the present critical situation of the colonies renders it highly necessary that ways and means should be devised for the speedy and secure conveyance of Intelligence from one end of the Continent to the other, Resolved, That Mr.[Benjamin] Franklin, Mr. [Thomas] Lynch, Mr. [Richard Henry] Lee, Mr. [Thomas] Willing, Mr. S[amuel] Adams, and Mr. P[hilip] Livingston, be a committee to consider the best means of establishing posts for conveying letters and intelligence through this continent. THURSDAY, JUNE 15, 1775 The report of the committee being read and debated, Resolved, That a General be appointed to command all the continental forces, raised, or to be raised, for the defence of American liberty. That five hundred dollars, per month, be allowed for his pay and expences. The Congress then proceeded to the choice of a general, by ballot, when George Washington, Esq. was unanimously elected.2 FRIDAY, JULY 21, 1775 (Franklin's Articles of Confederation) {Rev1} In a volume of the Papers of the Continental Congress No. 9, containing a history of the Confederation, the first entry in the writing of Charles Thomson reads: "July 21. 1775. Agreeably to Order the Congress resolved itself into a Committee of the whole to take into Consideration the State of America, when doct. B. Franklin submitted to their Consideration the following Sketch of Articles of Confederation." 1 Probably a scheme for a post office. Ward says the congress on this day also "considered of non-importation." 2 These resolutions were printed in the Pennsylvania Packet, 11 December, 1775. Washington was nominated by Thomas Johnson of Maryland, and the election was unanimous. The attitude of the Congress and the causes leading to this choice are fully described in the Diary and later correspondence of John Adams. New Jersey Postal History Society www.NJPostalHistory.org 2 Free Digital File The original Ms. is in No. 47, folio 1. It has long been believed that the trade propositions submitted by Franklin on this day originally formed part of the Articles of Confederation, and the two documents are usually printed together. In 1775 a British vessel captured copies on their way to South Carolina and the two papers were published as one; and again in the Archives of New Jersey, vol. X, p. 691. But Thomson's sentry must be conclusive. The Articles were probably submitted by Franklin of his own motion.] Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union, entered into agre proposed by the Delegates of the several Colonies of New Hampshire, &c &c, in general Congress met at Philadelphia, May 10, 1775. Art. I. The Name of this Confederacy shall henceforth be The United Colonies of North America. ..... Art. V. That the Power and Duty of the Congress shall extend to the Determining on War and Peace, to sending and receiving ambassadors, and entring into Alliances, [the Reconciliation with Great Britain;] the Settling all Disputes and Differences between Colony and Colony about Limits or any other cause if such should arise; and the Planting of new Colonies when proper. The Congress shall also make and propose such general Regulations Ordinances as tho' necessary to the General Welfare, particular Assemblies from their local Circum cannot be competent to; viz. such as may relate to those that may relate to our general Commerce; or general Currency; to the Establishment of Posts; and the Regulation of our common Forces. The Congress shall also have the Appointment of all General Officers, civil and military, appertaining to the general Confederacy, such as General Treasurer, Secretary, &c. TUESDAY, JULY 25, 1775 The Committee appointed to consider the ways and means of establishing posts, bro't in their report, which was read, and ordered to be taken into consideration to Morrow. Resolved, That the following Gentlemen be appointed and fully authorized to sign the same, viz. Luke Morris, Samuel Meredith, Judah Foulke, Samuel Morris, Frederic Kuhl, Robert Strettle Jones, Thomas Coombe, John Morton Ellis Lewis, John Mease, Thomas Lawrence, Robert Ritchie Daniel Clymer, John Maxwell Nesbit, Thomas Barclay, John Bayard, William Craig, Thomas Bartow Junr., John Shee, Isaae Hazelhurst, Robert Roberts, Anthony Morris, Mordecai Lewis, George Mifflin, Robert Tuckuiss Andrew Bunner, William Jackson, Joseph Sims, James Milligan, and James Reed. That each of the continental bills be numbered and signed by two of the above gentlemen. New Jersey Postal History Society www.NJPostalHistory.org 3 Free Digital File WEDNESDAY, JULY 26, 1775 Agreeable to the order of yesterday, the Congress resumed the consideration of the report of the Committee on the post office; which being debated by paragraphs, was agreed to as follows: That a postmaster General be appointed for the United Colonies, who shall hold his office at Philada, and shall be allowed a salary of 1000 dollars per an: for himself, and 340 dollars per an: for a secretary and Comptroller, with power to appoint such, and so many deputies as to him may seem proper and necessary. That a line of posts be appointed under the direction of the Postmaster general, from Falmouth in New England to Savannah in Georgia, with as many cross posts as he shall think fit. That the allowance to the deputies in lieu of salary and all contingent expences, shall be 20 per cent. on the sums they collect and pay into the General post office annually, when the whole is under or not exceeding 1000 Dollars, and ten per cent. for all sums above 1000 dollars a year. That the rates of postage shall be 20 pr cent less than those appointed by act of Parliament.3 That the several deputies account quarterly with the general post office, and the postmaster general annually with the continental treasurers, when he shall pay into the rect of the Sd Treasurers, the profits of the Post Office; and if the necessary expence of this establishment should exceed the produce of it, the deficiency shall be made good by the United Colonies, and paid to the postmaster general by the continental Treasr. On motion made, Resolved, That it be recommended to the postmaster general to establish a weekly post to South Carolina. That it be left to the postmaster general to appoint a secy and comptroller. The Congress then proceeded to the election of a postmaster general for one year, and until another is appointed by a future Congress, when Benjamin Franklin, Esqr. was unanimously chosen. That each gentleman who signs the continental money, be allowed and paid out of the continental treasury, one Dollar and one third of a dollar for each and every thousand bills signed, and numbered by him. That the gentlemen appointed to number and sign the Bills, do give their receipts for the same, expressing the number and denomination of them; and after numbering and signing them, shall deliver the same to the continental Treasurers, taking their receipts for the bills so delivered. 3 Suspended September 30. New Jersey Postal History Society www.NJPostalHistory.org 4 Free Digital File On motion, Resolved, That Mr. S[amuel] Adams, Mr. [Richard Henry] Lee, and Mr. J[ohn] Rutledge, with the Secretary, be a committee to revise the Journal of the Congress, and prepare it for the press. FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 1775 A letter from Genl Washington, dated the 21 of Septr, with sundry enclosures, being recr by express, was laid before Congress and read.4 The Committee of Accounts produced sundry accots. which they reported as just, viz. John Powell's, for riding express, a ballance due to him amounting to forty-five dollars and one-third of a dollar. Matthias Slough, for money advanced to the riffle companies, amounting to seven hundred and ten dollars and sixty-four ninetieths of a dollar. James Alexander for riding express, a ballance due to him, amounting to one hundred and seventy-two dollars and twenty-six ninetieths of a dollar. Ordered, That the above accounts be paid. SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 1775 It being represented to the Congress, that from the present situation of affairs and the correspondence now carried on through N. A., it is apprehended that if the rate of postage is lowered agreeable to the resolution of Congress, the proceeds of the office will not support the necessary riders; and as the people in general are well satisfied with, at least no complaints have been made with regard to, the rates lately paid for the postage of letters, On motion, Resolved, That the resolution of Congress respecting the lowering the rates of postage be suspended until farther orders from this Congress.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How Bad Were the Official Records of the Federal Convention?
    How Bad Were the Official Records of the Federal Convention? Mary Sarah Bilder* ABSTRACT The official records of the ConstitutionalConvention of 1787 have been neglected and dismissed by scholars for the last century, largely to due to Max Farrand'scriticisms of both the records and the man responsible for keeping them-Secretary of the Convention William Jackson. This Article disagrees with Farrand'sconclusion that the Convention records were bad, and aims to resurrect the records and Jackson's reputation. The Article suggests that the endurance of Farrand'scritique arises in part from misinterpretationsof cer- tain proceduralcomponents of the Convention and failure to appreciate the significance of others, understandable consideringthe inaccessibility of the of- ficial records. The Article also describes the story of the records after the Con- vention but before they were published, including the physical limbo of the records in the aftermath of the Convention and the eventual deposit of the records in March 1796 amidst the rapid development of disagreements over constitutional interpretation. Finally, the Article offers a few cautionary re- flections about the lessons to be drawn from the official records. Particularly, it recommends using caution with Max Farrand's records, paying increased attention to the procedural context of the Convention, and recognizing that Constitutionalinterpretation postdated the Constitution. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................... 1621 A NOTE ON THE RECORDS .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Collections of the Massachusetts Historical Society Have Yielded Data of Great Value
    UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH & <h % '781i# LIBRARY Founded 1791 COLLECTIONS VOLUME 77 Committee of Publication GEORGE FOOT MOORE CHESTER NOYES GREENOUGH HENRY WINCHESTER CUNNINGHAM GARDNER WELD ALLEN WORTHINGTON CHAUNCEY FORD O O C o «J i- JS o ^ 5M 5 e c 2 2 d *- c u o o a u U <J . .E . »"".g-o Ufa s/i rt o - J= * « *v '-5 c = •,v\ $ 3. o -S < =2 :-«>Zw-2 .5 o .5 w %'g ?>« „ -S (S E IIS* Si a 1 o Stf SOS.S ^ jr o 3 o fV^V .£ -J fe g < z B, C-C/) g - > 5 <* Ok ° 5 5 o -" r- < <3 13— p N». O < u W - § "m, .* -5 ^ o u 15 ~ ,~ - z <1 > * Q < ? O MASSACHUSETTS PRIVATEERS OF THE REVOLUTION BY GARDNER WELD ALLEN PUBLISHED AT THE CHARGE OF THE LAWRENCE FUND The Massachusetts Historical Society 1927 Five hundred copies of this volume have been printed from type and the type distributed. PRINTED AT THE HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS CAMBRIDGE, MASS., U.S.A. ILLUSTRATIONS A Privateersman's Commission Frontispiece State Archives, 166, 72. Letter urging the Need of Armed Vessels .... facing page 20 State Archives, 193, 277. Petition for a Commission for a Vessel which has already taken Prizes without one 32 State Archives, 165, 477. Bond of a Whaler 38 State Archives, 139, 65. A State Bond 44 State Archives, vu, 204. Inquiry as to Disposal of Prisoners 56 Massachusetts Historical Society, Pickering Papers, xxxiii, 138. Bond not to recruit in any Town which has not raised its Quota for the Continental Army 66 State Archives, 139, 127.
    [Show full text]
  • How Bad Were the Official Records of the Federal Convention?
    How Bad Were the Official Records of the Federal Convention? Mary Sarah Bilder* ABSTRACT The official records of the Constitutional Convention of 1787 have been neglected and dismissed by scholars for the last century, largely to due to Max Farrand’s criticisms of both the records and the man responsible for keeping them—Secretary of the Convention William Jackson. This Article disagrees with Farrand’s conclusion that the Convention records were bad, and aims to resurrect the records and Jackson’s reputation. The Article suggests that the endurance of Farrand’s critique arises in part from misinterpretations of cer- tain procedural components of the Convention and failure to appreciate the significance of others, understandable considering the inaccessibility of the of- ficial records. The Article also describes the story of the records after the Con- vention but before they were published, including the physical limbo of the records in the aftermath of the Convention and the eventual deposit of the records in March 1796 amidst the rapid development of disagreements over constitutional interpretation. Finally, the Article offers a few cautionary re- flections about the lessons to be drawn from the official records. Particularly, it recommends using caution with Max Farrand’s records, paying increased attention to the procedural context of the Convention, and recognizing that Constitutional interpretation postdated the Constitution. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................. 1621 A NOTE ON THE RECORDS
    [Show full text]
  • How Bad Were the Official Records of the Federal Convention? Mary Sarah Bilder Boston College Law School, [email protected]
    Boston College Law School Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School Boston College Law School Faculty Papers 10-17-2012 How Bad Were the Official Records of the Federal Convention? Mary Sarah Bilder Boston College Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/lsfp Recommended Citation Mary Sarah Bilder. "How Bad Were the Official Records of the Federal Convention?." The George Washington Law Review 80, no.6 (2012): 1620-1682. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law School Faculty Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. How Bad Were the Official Records of the Federal Convention? Mary Sarah Bilder* ABSTRACT The official records of the Constitutional Convention of 1787 have been neglected and dismissed by scholars for the last century, largely to due to Max Farrand’s criticisms of both the records and the man responsible for keeping them—Secretary of the Convention William Jackson. This Article disagrees with Farrand’s conclusion that the Convention records were bad, and aims to resurrect the records and Jackson’s reputation. The Article suggests that the endurance of Farrand’s critique arises in part from misinterpretations of cer- tain procedural components of the Convention and failure to appreciate the significance of others, understandable considering the inaccessibility of the of- ficial records. The Article also describes the story of the records after the Con- vention but before they were published, including the physical limbo of the records in the aftermath of the Convention and the eventual deposit of the records in March 1796 amidst the rapid development of disagreements over constitutional interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • Record-House. 2153 \
    . ~939, .GO .~GR_ESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE. 2153 \. · HOUSE OF REPR~SENTATIVES The Democratic vote exceeds the Republican vote by 661,664. THURSDAY, MARCH 2, 1939 In other words, the Democratic vote, as compared with The House met at 12 o'clock noon. the Republican vote, was more than 3 to 1. The Reverend James A. Fitzpatrick, Order of Preachers, In the colored section of Chicago the Democratic vote for Dominican House of studies, Washington, D. C., offered the mayor in the second ward was 16,225. · The Republican vote , following prayer: for mayor was 15,057-a clear Democratic majority of 1,168. In the third ward the Democratic vote for mayor was 15,547; Omnipotent and merciful God who has vouchsafed to make the Republican vote for mayor was 9,521-a clear Democratic · known the truths and the principles which alone afford the majority in that ward of 6,026. In the two wards the total proper perspective to the lives of individuals and of nations, Democratic vote was 31,772, while the total Republican vote . and which alone exercise that directive influence which was 24,578-making a clear Democratic majority in these i restrains greed, condemns lawlessness, and exalts righteous­ two wards of 7,194. : ness, look with favor upon the Members of this legislative These figures are taken from the very partisan Republican I body whom Thou hast raised to the dignity of being coopera­ newspaper, the Chicago Daily News, owned and published : tors with Thee in the establishment and extension of Thy by Colonel Knox, candidate for Vice President on the Re­ : kingdom of justice and of love among men.
    [Show full text]
  • New Letters of Abigail Adams PART II, 1798-1801
    New Letters of Abigail Adams PART II, 1798-1801 None of these letters, or any part of these letters, may be reproduced with the exception of short passages for the purpose of review, without permission in writing from the Director of the Society, Worcester, Massachusetts Philadelphia, Jan'ry 5th, 1798 MY DEAR SISTER: I received your kind Letter of December and was surprized to find that my Letter should convey the first intelligence of the death of Mr. & Mrs. Hall to Mr. & Mrs. Black, as their Brother assured me he had written three weeks before.' I told him I would take charge of any Letter from him, and could nearly vouch for its going safely. I was much dissatisfied when Mrs. Brisler sought the Child so earnestly and could not find it, and thought it my duty to inform Mrs. Black of it, as I did immediately upon his [Mr. Black's brother] sending the child to me.'' My own conclusions were that it was at Nurse with some person, and in some place that he did not chuse my people should see. However this may be, the Nurse who brought the child and whom I saw Nurse it in my Chamber whilst she stay'd, is a very decent, respectable, healthy looking woman, above the common level of such persons here. I have already written Mrs. Black my opinion of her and her replies to such questions as I put to her; I shall send some of my people to see the child as you say, when they are not expected, and I will have it brought me as often as once a Month, and I will let the Nurse know, that the Child has relatives who are much interested for it, and design to take it in the Spring, if the Child lives untill the Spring.
    [Show full text]
  • H. Doc. 108-222
    Biographies 1667 in Madison County, N.Y.; district attorney 1839; served as Connecticut National Guard 1895-1901; city assessor 1900- judge of Madison County 1840-1848; unsuccessful Free- 1915; elected as a Republican to the Sixty-fourth Congress Soiler candidate for election to the Thirtieth Congress in (March 4, 1915-March 3, 1917); unsuccessful candidate for 1846; first president of the Metropolitan Board of Police, reelection in 1916 to the Sixty-fifth Congress; died in New New York City 1857-1860; appointed by President Abraham Haven, Conn., November 18, 1920; interment in Cedar Hill Lincoln in 1861 as Governor of the newly created Nevada Cemetery, Hartford, Conn. Territory; upon the admission of Nevada as a state into the Union in 1864, was elected as a Republican to the OAKLEY, Thomas Jackson, a Representative from New United States Senate; reelected in 1867 and served from York; born near Poughkeepsie, Dutchess County, N.Y., No- December 16, 1864, to March 3, 1873; unsuccessful can- vember 10, 1783; was graduated from Yale College in 1801; didate for reelection; chairman, Committee on Enrolled Bills studied law; was admitted to the bar in 1804 and com- (Thirty-ninth Congress), Committee on Revolutionary Claims menced practice in Poughkeepsie, N.Y.; surrogate of (Fortieth Congress), Committee on Territories (Forty-first Dutchess County in 1810 and 1811; elected as a Federalist Congress); died in White Plains, Westchester County, N.Y., to the Thirteenth Congress (March 4, 1813-March 3, 1815); December 25, 1876; interment in Woodlawn Cemetery, New member of the State assembly in 1816 and 1818-1820; attor- York City.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life and Letters of Harrison Gray Otis, Federalist, 1765-1848
    HARRISON GRAY OTIS By Samuel Eliot Morison 2 hH^. L I E) RAR.Y OF THL U N IVLR5ITY Of ILLINOIS B 0873m v.l cop,2 111. Hist, rr"survey THE LIFE AND LETTERS OF HARRISON GRAY OTIS 1765-1848 IN TWO VOLUMES VOLUME I THE MBRARY or THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS THE LIFE AND LETTERS OF HARRISON GRAY OTIS FEDERALIST 1765-1848 BY SAMUEL ELIOT MORISON, Ph.D. (Harv.) WITH PORTRAITS AND OTHER ILLUSTRATIONS VOL. I BOSTON AND NEW YORK HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY 1913 COPYRIGHT, I913, BY SAMUEL ELIOT MORISON ALL UIGHTS RESERVED Published November iqi^ V, 1 cop. Z. TO MY MOTHER 55;:;;2545 Tell me, ye learned, shall we for ever be adding so much to the bulk — so little to the stock ? Shall we for ever make new books, as apotheca- ries make new mixtures, by pouring only out of one vessel into another? Are we for ever to be twisting, and untwisting the same rope? for ever in the same track — for ever at the same pace? Shall we be destined to the days of eternity, . to be shewing the relicks of learning, as monks do the relicks of their saints — without working one — one single miracle with them? — Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman Vol. V, Chap. I. PREFACE In the following pages I have attempted to describe the life of a man of \ngorous and fascinating personality, who was born in Boston ten years before the Revolution com- menced, who entered national politics during Washing- ton's second administration, who was a leader in the in- teresting movement that culminated in the Hartford Convention of 1814, and who lived to take a part in the presidential campaign of 1848.
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSE ...No. 1832
    HOUSE .... No. 1832 Che Commontoealth of spagsachusettg. A RECORD OF THE PORTRAITS, BUSTS, STATUES, BAS- RELIEFS AND TABLETS IN OR ABOUT THE STATE HOUSE, BOSTON. Compiled by E l l e n M udge B u r r i l l , Sergeant-at-Arms’ Department, February 29, 1924. The following is a record of the portraits, busts, statues, bas-reliefs and tablets, that have been placed in or about the State House, Boston, in honor of Governors and others, prominent in Plymouth and Massachusetts history, together with those whose names are enrolled in the frescoes and stained glass windows; also the mural paintings. The names of all the Governors, from the settlement of Plymouth Colony and Massachusetts Bay Colony, through the State Constitution to the present, also the Presidents of the Senate and Speakers of the House of Representatives, from 1780 to the present, are given, with an asterisk to signify the portraits not yet in the collection. P o r t r a i t s . Governors of Plymouth Colony. [The asterisk (*) signifies the portraits not yet in the collection.] Term of Service. Artist. Notes. •John Carver 1620-21 _ •William Bradford 1621-33 1635-36 1637-38 1639-44 1645-57 Edward Winslow 1633-34 Walter Gilman Page . From original in Pilgrim Hall, Ply­ 1636-37 mouth. Given by the Massachu­ 1644-45 setts Society, Order of Founders and Patriots of America, May 27, 1922. •Thomas Prence . 1634-35 1638-39 1657-73 •Josiah Winslow . 1673-80 - •Thomas Hinckley 1680-92 - Except during the administration of Sir Edmund Andros, 1686-89.
    [Show full text]
  • The-Life-Of-Mercy-Otis-Warren
    WOMEN OF COLONIAL AND REVOLUTIONARY TIMES^s MERCY IVARREN BY ALICE BROWN IVITH PORTRAIT CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS NEW YORK MDCCCXCVI PREFACE There are few co7isecutive incidents, save the catalogue of births, marriages, and deaths, to be gathered concerning the life of Mercy Otis Warren. Therefore it seems necessary to regard her through those picturesque events of the na- tional welfare which touched her most nearly, and of u'hich she ivas a part. It is impossible to trace her, step by step, through her eighty-six years; she can only be regarded by the flash- light of isolated topics. In compiling this sketch of the Revolutionary period, I am especially indebted to Winslow Warren, Esq., and Charles Francis Adams, Esq., for their generosity and courtesy in allow- ing me the use of the valuable manuscripts in their possession. I have also to 7naJce grateful acknoivledgment to the Collections of the 3Iassa- chusetts Historical Society ; the life of James Otis, by William Tudor ; the Life of Thomas Hutchinson, by James K. Hosmer ; a History Vll PREFACE of American Literature^ hy Moses Coit Tyler ; American Literature, hy C. F. Richardson ; the Governor'' s Garden, by George It. R. Rivers ; to all Mrs. Alice Morse EarWs delightful pictures of a hy-gone day, and to scores of hooks so vivid or so accurate as to have hecome the commonplace of reference. A. B, Boston, October 3, 1S96. Vlll CONTENTS PAGE !-IN THE BEGINNING — Ancestry of Mercy Otis Old-World Associations— of the first John Otis — Dissension in Hingham John Winlhrop's Trial — Life on Cape Cod — Distinguished Members of the Otis family II-BARNSTABLE DAYS Childhood in Colonial Times— Intimacy between James and Mercy Otis — James Otis's Tastes and Education — Life at the Barnstable Farmhouse — A Harvard Com- mencement-Professional Life and Marriage of James Otis — Marriage of Mercy Otis to James Warren .
    [Show full text]
  • New Letters of Abigail Adams 1788-1801
    New Letters of Abigail Adams 1788-1801 EDITED BY STEVS^ART MITCHELL INTRODUCTION N 1942 the American Antiquarian Society acquired a I collection of two hundred and fifty letters written by Abigail (Smith) Adams, wife of the second President of the United States, to her sister Mary, who was married to Richard Cranch, of Braintree. These letters came from the estate of William G. A. Turner, of Maiden, Massachusetts, having been inherited from Mary Greenleaf Dawes, the great, great granddaughter of that Mary (Smith) Cranch to whom all but one of the letters printed herewith were addressed.! It is interesting to note that sixteen letters, written by Abigail (Smith) Adams to her sister, Mary (Smith) Cranch, were included in the large, if strictly edited, collection of Abigail Adams letters which were published iri 1840 by her grandson, Charles Francis Adams (1807-1886). Just why the letters now published were left in: manuscript at that time may (or may not) be a mystery.^ From the two hundred and fifty letters purchased by the Society, one hundred and forty-two have been selected for present publication in the Proceedings. The first of these letters is dated November 24, 1788, and the last, February 7, ' Proc. Am. Antiq. Soc, vol. 52, p. 178. ' In 1942, twelve letters written by Abigail Adams between 1786 and 1811 were pub- lished in the Proceedings of the Massachusetts Historical Society, vol. 66, pp. 126-53. These letters came from the DeWindt Collection in the possession'of the Society. 96 AMERICAN ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY [April, 1801. It was a stroke of good luck for American history that this group of manuscript letters did not pass into the posses- sion of custodians who could have chosen to prevent their publication, or might have imposed a censorship based on some stubborn, if mistaken, concept of the past.
    [Show full text]