DOCSLIB.ORG

PATRON of ISLAM? by Daniel Pipes and Mimi Stillman*

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PATRON of ISLAM? by Daniel Pipes and Mimi Stillman* THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT: PATRON OF ISLAM? By Daniel Pipes and Mimi Stillman* The U.S. government has, almost without realizing it, developed a position toward the religion of Islam, not in theological terms but regarding such issues as Islamism and terrorism in the name of Islam. Whether Republican or Democrat, the leaders' statements defend Islam as a moderate and peaceful religion which extremists distort; more surprisingly, they also promote Islam in the United States. Islam has dominated American public life on contexts, that tradition is still a strong one. two occasions, once during the period of the When the “Real IRA” killed twenty-eight at Iranian hostage crisis from 1979 to 1981, a fair in Omagh, Ireland,(1) the U.S. and more recently since the attacks against president did not seize the opportunity to the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on ruminate on the true nature of Catholicism. September 11, 2001. In both instances, Baruch Goldstein’s murderous rampage in Americans responded with outrage and Hebron spurred no commentary on Judaism puzzlement to the sight of ostensibly pious by the secretary of state. The Bharatiya individuals (Ayatollah Khomeini then, Janata Party, with its Hindu nationalist Usama bin Ladin now) sponsoring outlook, prompted no high-level analyses of unprovoked violence against American Hinduism on its coming to power in India. civilians. Each time, Islam became one of The same used to be the case with Islam. the most discussed topics in American In theory, anyway, it still is. At a festive public life. dinner she held for American Muslims in But the U.S. government responded very 2000, then-secretary of state Madeleine K. differently to the Islamic dimension of these Albright informed her guests that, “Of two episodes. In that first round, it stayed course, the United States doesn’t have a aloof from the debate, limiting itself to political policy towards Islam.”(2) One of policy pronouncements on Iran. Islam was her staff confirmed this on the operational mentioned hardly, if ever, in keeping with level: “Islam is not a factor in our the time-honored and acceptable practice of policymaking.”(3) U.S. officials saying little about matters of But this is simply not true anymore. faith. After all, these were politicians and Islam, the most political of religions, now diplomats, not scholars of religion. enjoys a privileged place in Washington, just “Discoursing” on Islam was not exactly their as it does in almost every capital around the specialization, and they were humble enough world. The first Bush administration began to know it. the discussion of Islam in June 1992. On But the reticence ran deeper: as coming to office in 1993, the Clinton spokespersons for the U.S. government, a administration developed a fairly subtle constitutionally secular institution, they policy toward Islam. Policy formulation knew not to articulate views on the truth or accelerated in the present Bush falsehood of specific religions. In some administration. And since September 11, the Middle East Review of International Affairs, Vol. 6, No. 1 (March 2002) 49 Daniel Pipes and Mimi Stillman president and his team have devoted Whenever the topic came up, the lesser intensive efforts to explaining what role ranks dutifully lined up behind their Islam did and did not play in the recent superiors. Deputy Assistant Secretary of tragedy. “Islam” now trips off the tongues of State Ronald Neumann found “no inherent American statesmen, politicians, and conflict between Islam and the West. We do diplomats with an almost dizzying not see any ‘clash of civilizations.’”(9) frequency. Special Advisor to the Secretary of State While the intensity of the current debate John Beyrle found that “it makes no sense to is new, the substance of current U.S. see America as a nation ‘in conflict’ with government statements on Islam is not. The Islam.”(10) According to a State Department latest statements develop the themes and fact sheet, “Islam and the West are not in arguments of a policy articulated over the confrontation.”(11) Even the Department of past decade. That policy has four main Defense, not usually concerned with such elements, each of which has become a policy matters, had an opinion: according to Deputy mantra: There is no clash of civilizations. Assistant Secretary Bruce Riedel, “The Terrorism is not Islamic. Islam is compatible Pentagon rejects the argument that a clash of with American ideals and adds to American civilizations is imminent between Islam and life. Americans must learn to appreciate the West.”(12) Islam. As a corollary, officialdom argued against the idea that Islam had been CLASH OF CIVILIZATIONS promoted to the status of enemy. “We The first and most urgent task that should not accept the notion,“ said R. James government spokesmen tackle is Woolsey, former director of the Central contradicting the idea that the Cold War has Intelligence Agency, that “the ‘Red Menace’ been replaced by a “clash of civilizations.” that dominated our lives for nearly a half a Samuel Huntington of Harvard first century is now being replaced by a ‘Green proposed the idea in 1993; in his catalog of Menace’ sweeping throughout the Arab possible conflicts, a “clash of civilizations” world.”(13) Assistant Secretary of State for between Islam and the West loomed Near Eastern Affairs Edward Djerejian large.(4) Over and over again, officialdom asserted that the U.S. government “does not asserts the falseness of this idea. President view Islam as the next ‘ism’ confronting the Clinton himself argued with Huntington, West or threatening world peace.”(14) declaring it “terribly wrong” to believe in Martin Indyk, at the time serving on the “an inevitable clash” between the West and National Security Council staff, broadened Islam. To support his point, he called on the the point: “We do not regard Islam as a authority of U.S. Muslims, who “will tell threat.”(15) The only crack in the façade was you there is no inherent clash between Islam provided after September 11, when Deputy and America.”(5) More disdainfully, Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz Albright noted that “The United States has implied that Samuel Huntington did not no interest in the ‘clash’ with Islam that create the problem, he only diagnosed it: some commentators have predicted.”(6) To “These criminals … want to inflame a war the contrary, there is “no inherent conflict of the cultures, and we should avoid between Islam and the United States.”(7) that.”(16) Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs Samuel R. Berger echoed TERRORISM IS NOT ISLAMIC the theme: “There is no clash of The second task the U.S. government has civilizations.”(8) taken upon itself is severing the common 50 Middle East Review of International Affairs, Vol. 6, No. 1 (March 2002) The United States Government: Patron of Islam? association Americans make between Islam group in Algeria was acting against “the and terrorism. Officialdom does not deny principles of Islam,” according to Robert that devout-seeming Muslims are constantly Pelletreau, who also moonlighted as trying to kill Americans, but it vociferously assistant secretary of state.(24) R. James denies their connection to Islam. Woolsey, the former director of the Central President Clinton complained about “so Intelligence Agency, considered it “a major many people” unfairly identifying “the mistake” to blame Islam for the state of forces of radicalism and terrorism” with affairs in Iran today, and specifically for the Islam.(17) As he acknowledged, “we have choice of its leaders to rely heavily on terror. had problems with terrorism coming out of Woolsey argued that “a few men” who had the Middle East” but he then insisted that broken with Islamic traditions alone were this “is not inherently related to Islam, not to responsible for the situation in Iran.(25) the religion, not to the culture.”(18) A Michael A. Sheehan, the State Department’s Department of State fact sheet echoed the coordinator for counter-terrorism, called president: “Terrorism is not a principle of terrorism “a perversion of the teachings of any major religion, including Islam.”(19) Islam.”(26) Beyrle checked his copy of the And the department’s coordinator for Qur’an and concluded “that extremism is not counter-terrorism, Philip Wilcox, Jr., went truly Islamic.”(27) “Terrorists who claim to still further: “Islam, like Christianity and speak for Islam,” averred Wilcox, “are Judaism, preaches peace and non- abusing their faith.”(28) violence.”(20) The events of September 11 brought this Some Muslims may preach non-violence. issue to center stage. Interestingly, while all But how do politicians and diplomats government officials agreed that the four account for the stubborn fact that Muslim hijackings could not be ascribed to Islam, radicals have attacked Americans in such they differed among themselves on the diverse locales as Lebanon, Yemen, Kenya, question of whether it was simply, as the Philippines, New York, and Wolfowitz put it, “not an Islamic act”(29) or Washington? By deeming such attacks something done in actual contravention of contrary to Islam. In 1994, Clinton criticized Islam. “the forces of terror and extremism, who President Bush’s speech to Congress cloak themselves in the rhetoric of religion pointed to the first interpretation: and nationalism but behave in ways that contradict the very teachings of their faith The terrorists practice a fringe form and mock their patriotism.”(21) He returned of Islamic extremism that has been to this topic in 1998, accusing Usama bin rejected by Muslim scholars and the Ladin and his associates of engaging in “a vast majority of Muslim clerics; a horrible distortion of their religion to justify fringe movement that perverts the the murder of innocents.” He dismissed them peaceful teachings of Islam ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Report ID
    Number 21 April 2004 BAKER INSTITUTE REPORT NOTES FROM THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY OF RICE UNIVERSITY BAKER INSTITUTE CELEBRATES ITS 10TH ANNIVERSARY Vice President Dick Cheney was man you only encounter a few the keynote speaker at the Baker times in life—what I call a ‘hun- See our special Institute’s 10th anniversary gala, dred-percenter’—a person of which drew nearly 800 guests to ability, judgment, and absolute gala feature with color a black-tie dinner October 17, integrity,” Cheney said in refer- 2003, that raised more than ence to Baker. photos on page 20. $3.2 million for the institute’s “This is a man who was chief programs. Cynthia Allshouse and of staff on day one of the Reagan Rice trustee J. D. Bucky Allshouse years and chief of staff 12 years ing a period of truly momentous co-chaired the anniversary cel- later on the last day of former change,” Cheney added, citing ebration. President Bush’s administra- the fall of the Soviet Union, the Cheney paid tribute to the tion,” Cheney said. “In between, Persian Gulf War, and a crisis in institute’s honorary chair, James he led the treasury department, Panama during Baker’s years at A. Baker, III, and then discussed oversaw two landslide victories in the Department of State. the war on terrorism. presidential politics, and served “There is a certain kind of as the 61st secretary of state dur- continued on page 24 NIGERIAN PRESIDENT REFLECTS ON CHALLENGES FACING HIS NATION President Olusegun Obasanjo of the Republic of Nigeria observed that Africa, as a whole, has been “unstable for too long” during a November 5, 2003, presentation at the Baker Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • 6086 AR Cover R1:17.310 MFAH AR 2015-16 Cover.Rd4.Qxd
    μ˙ The Museum of Fine Arts, Houston annual report 2015–2016 MFAH BY THE NUMBERS July 1, 2015–June 30, 2016 • 900,595 visits to the Museum, the Lillie and Hugh Roy Tuition Attendance Revenue $3.2 Other Cullen Sculpture Garden, Bayou Bend Collection and $2.1 5% 3% $7.1 Gardens, Rienzi, and the Glassell School of Art 11% Membership Revenue $2.9 • 112,000 visitors and students reached through learning 5% and interpretation programs on-site and off-site FY 2016 • 37,521 youth visitors ages 18 and under received free Operating Operating Revenues Endowment or discounted access to the MFAH Fund-raising (million) Spending $14.2 $34.0 22% 54% • 42,865 schoolchildren and their chaperones received free tours of the MFAH • 1,020 community engagement programs were presented Total Revenues: $63.5 million • 100 community partners citywide collaborated with the MFAH Exhibitions, Curatorial, and Collections $12.5 Auxiliary • 2,282,725 visits recorded at mfah.org 20% Activities $3.2 5% • 119,465 visits recorded at the new online collections Fund-raising $4.9 module 8% • 197,985 people followed the MFAH on Facebook, FY 2016 Education, Instagram, and Twitter Operating Expenses Libraries, (million) and Visitor Engagment $12.7 • 266,580 unique visitors accessed the Documents 21% of 20th-Century Latin American and Latino Art Website, icaadocs.mfah.org Management Buildings and Grounds and General $13.1 and Security $15.6 21% • 69,373 visitors attended Sculpted in Steel: Art Deco 25% Automobiles and Motorcycles, 1929–1940 Total Expenses: $62 million • 26,434 member
    [Show full text]
  • Confronting Antisemitism in Modern Media, the Legal and Political Worlds an End to Antisemitism!
    Confronting Antisemitism in Modern Media, the Legal and Political Worlds An End to Antisemitism! Edited by Armin Lange, Kerstin Mayerhofer, Dina Porat, and Lawrence H. Schiffman Volume 5 Confronting Antisemitism in Modern Media, the Legal and Political Worlds Edited by Armin Lange, Kerstin Mayerhofer, Dina Porat, and Lawrence H. Schiffman ISBN 978-3-11-058243-7 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-067196-4 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-067203-9 DOI https://10.1515/9783110671964 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. For details go to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Library of Congress Control Number: 2021931477 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2021 Armin Lange, Kerstin Mayerhofer, Dina Porat, Lawrence H. Schiffman, published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston The book is published with open access at www.degruyter.com Cover image: Illustration by Tayler Culligan (https://dribbble.com/taylerculligan). With friendly permission of Chicago Booth Review. Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck www.degruyter.com TableofContents Preface and Acknowledgements IX LisaJacobs, Armin Lange, and Kerstin Mayerhofer Confronting Antisemitism in Modern Media, the Legal and Political Worlds: Introduction 1 Confronting Antisemitism through Critical Reflection/Approaches
    [Show full text]
  • Islam - Washington's New Dilemma :: Middle East Quarterly
    Islam - Washington's New Dilemma :: Middle East Quarterly http://www.meforum.org/289/islam-washingtons-new-dilemma Islam - Washington's New Dilemma by Benjamin Gordon Middle East Quarterly March 1996, pp. 43-52 http://www.meforum.org/289/islam-washingtons-new-dilemma Benjamin Gordon is a consultant at Corporate Decisions, Inc., Boston, and a recent graduate of Yale College. Does the U.S. government have a coherent policy toward fundamentalist Islam? Fundamentalists themselves are convinced not only that Washington has a policy but that it is a consistent and aggressive one. Iran's former ambassador to the United Nations, Said Raja'i Khourasani, asserts that the American position "has not changed" over the years: "The language is always the same -- it is threatened or it is threatening."1 On the other side, scholars and diplomats tend to see incoherence in policy toward fundamentalists as they do about foreign policy in general. Richard Haass speaks for many when he holds that "public statements by administration officials about the purposes of U.S. foreign policy have been inconsistent or simply ambiguous.2 In fact, neither side is entirely correct. While there has been a coherent policy, it has changed over time. Since 1979, when Iranian fundamentalist Muslims overthrew Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi and stormed the U.S. embassy in Tehran, Washington has undergone a series of subtle shifts in its policy toward fundamentalist Islam. From Presidents Reagan to Bush to Clinton, the U.S. government has migrated from rhetorical confrontation to timid outreach to outright accommodation. The following analysis focuses on official U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Syrian-Israeli Peace Process and the United States from Hope To
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Ghent University Academic Bibliography FACULTEIT POLITIEKE EN SOCIALE WETENSCHAPPEN VAKGROEP STUDIE VAN DE DERDE WERELD The Syrian-Israeli Peace Process and The United States From Hope to Impasse 1991-2000 Ahmad Soltani Nejad June 2004 Dissertation submitted for the degree of doctoral in political Science Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Ruddy Doom 2 Table of contents Acknowledgements 3 Maps 4 1. Introduction 7 2. Theoretical Framework 21 3. U.S.-Syrian relations 41 4. The Madrid Peace Conference 67 5. The Oslo Peace Process 90 6. Slow Progress After Oslo Accords (1993-1994) 108 7. Progress on the Syrian-Israeli track (1994- 1996) 124 8. Deadlock in the Syrian-Israeli negotiations (1996- 1999) 138 9. Shepherdstown Talks (January 2000) 155 10. Syrian perspectives on the main issues of the peace process 173 11. Conclusions 193 Documents 211 Bibliography 214 3 Acknowledgements I am greatly indebted to several people and institutions for their assistance in the formation and completion of this study. I am grateful to my supervisor Prof. Ruddy Doom who has always been helpful throughout the conduct of this research. With his generous support I was able to come to the University of Ghent and later on pursue my research at the University of Arizona as an Exchange Visiting Scholar. The Center for Middle Eastern Studies there provided the opportunity for me to pursue my research with specialists at the University and to access the resources that I needed to conduct this research. I am grateful particularly to Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • United States
    United States National Affairs AMERICANS,ISRAELIS, and Palestinians held elections during 2006, leaving a dramatically different cast of leaders by year's end. When all the ballots were counted in the U.S., a record number of Jews were among the winners. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict influenced all aspects of the Ameri- can Jewish public-affairs agenda. Internationally, it impacted Jewish attitudes toward the war in Iraq, the prospect of a nuclear Iran, and even Jewish advocacy to end the genocide in Darfur. Domestically, ad hominem attacks on "the Israel lobby" had the ring of anti-Jewish spiracy charges, and much of the Jewish interfaith encounter re- ived around the positions of evangelical and mainline Protestants on ael. THE POLITICAL ARENA "term Elections Election Day 2006, Democrats swept into power in both houses of ress, returning to full control after 12 years in political exile. In the Democrats gained 30 seats, sending 22 incumbent Republicans to defeat. They would have a 17-vote majority in the 110th Con- In the Senate, Democrats defeated six incumbent Republicans, in- ng their own strength from 44 to 49. With the benefit of two 'dents opting to caucus with the Democrats, they would hold a 51- enate majority. olls showed that the war in Iraq and the condition of the economy the list of issues motivating voters, displacing appeals to "values" iad spelled success for Republican candidates in recent elections. ndments and referenda restricting marriage to heterosexual couples 63 64 I AMERICAN JEWISHYEAR1300K,2007 were on the ballot in several states, but the issue seemed to be losing steam, going down to defeat in one state and passing in others by closer margins than in previous years.
    [Show full text]
  • Readings in European Security Full Text
    READINGS IN EUROPEAN SECURITY READINGS IN EUROPEAN SECURITY VOLUME I WORKING PAPERS OF THE CEPS-IISS EUROPEAN SECURITY FORUM NOS. 1-9 FRANÇOIS HEISBOURG, CHAIRMAN MARC HOUBEN, KLAUS BECHER & MICHAEL EMERSON, EDITORS CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN POLICY STUDIES BRUSSELS INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR SECURITY STUDIES LONDON CEPS and IISS gratefully acknowledge financial support received for the European Security Forum from the Boeing Corporation, Compagnia di San Paolo, the German Marshall Fund of the United States, Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company, NATO and SAAB. ISBN 92-9079-407-0 © Copyright 2002, Centre for European Policy Studies & International Institute for Security Studies. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means – electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise – without the prior permission of the Centre for European Policy Studies or the International Institute for Security Studies. Centre for European Policy Studies International Institute for Strategic Studies Place du Congrès 1 Arundel House 1000 Brussels, Belgium 13-15 Arundel Street, Temple Place Tel: 32 (0) 2 229.39.11 London WC2R 3DX, United Kingdom Fax: 32 (0) 2 219.41.51 Tel: 44 (0) 20 7379 7676 E-mail: [email protected] Fax: 44 (0) 20 7836 3108 Website: http://www.ceps.be E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.iiss.org READINGS IN EUROPEAN SECURITY VOLUME I WORKING PAPERS OF THE CEPS-IISS EUROPEAN SECURITY FORUM CONTRIBUTORS DANA H. ALLIN ALEXEI G. ARBATOV NADIA ALEXANDROVA ARBATOVA VLADIMIR BARANOVSKY KLAUS BECHER ANTHONY H. CORDESMAN IVO H. DAALDER DMITRY DANILOV MARTA DASSÙ ALAIN DIECKHOFF EDWARD P.
    [Show full text]
  • Savannah Jewish Federation
    Shabbat and Holiday Candle Lighting Times Middle East Expert Daniel Pipes Friday, September 7 7:23pm Friday, September 14 7:14pm Sunday, September 16 7:11pm to Keynote Main Event Monday, September 17 8:05pm Friday, September 21 7:04pm The Savannah Jewish Federation’s together to do great work to create and main- ing advocacy ef- Tuesday, September 25 6:59pm 2013 Community Campaign will of- tain a thriving Jewish community.” forts, dealing with fi cially launch on October 10th at “The Savannah Jewish Federation is step- domestic security Friday, September 28 6:55pm the Annual Meeting/Main Event ping up efforts to enhance Jewish identity, build concerns or some- Dinner. With the theme, “Together an exciting and engaging Jewish community thing else. Our In this Issue we do extraordinary things,” the — and care for the community’s vulnerable,” recent work with Annual Campaign is the Savannah said Federation President, Jeff Lasky. Mayor Jackson is Daniel Pipes Federation President’s message, p3 Jewish community’s largest ongoing “For children, there’s the PJ Library that just one example of Executive Director’s message, p3 fundraising effort. Funds raised during provides free children’s books and CDs and for enhancing our relationship with Israel.” Shlicha’s message, p6 the yearly drive support local, national teens we provide funding for the local BBYO For the dozens of Savannah-area Vital Statistics, p10 and international agencies, programs, chapter. Thanks to the support of the com- individuals and families in need, Fed- JEA Centerpiece services and projects. In addition to munity and a successful campaign, the Fed- eration’s Jewish Family Services has Four Questions, p13 serving as a forum for the Federation’s eration last year completely funded fi nancial granted funds for food, utilities, rent, On the Personal Side, p17 It’s a Funny Thing, p18 Annual Meeting business issues, the assistance requests from Hillels at Georgia mortgages, and medical needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Coming to Terms: Fundamentalists Or Islamists? by Martin Kramer Middle East Quarterly Spring 2003, Pp
    Coming to Terms: Fundamentalists or Islamists? by Martin Kramer Middle East Quarterly Spring 2003, pp. 65­77 http://www.meforum.org/541/coming­to­terms­fundamentalists­or­islamists No one who reads or writes about events in the Muslim world can avoid the question of how to label those Muslims who invoke Islam as the source of authority for all political and social action. Should they be labeled Islamic (or Muslim) fundamentalists? Or are they better described as Islamists? The issue has been the subject of a heated debate for two decades. For a while, both general and scholarly usage in America accepted fundamentalism. Islamism emerged in the late 1980s in French academe and then crossed into English, where it eventually displaced Islamic fundamentalism in specialized contexts. More recently, the term Islamism has gained even wider currency, and since September 11, 2001, it may even have established itself as the preferred American usage. Still newer terminology may lie over the horizon. Behind the battle over usage lies another struggle, over the nature of the phenomenon itself. In fact, the two contests, over English usage and analytical understanding, are inseparable. Nor are they free of associations left by past usages. Here follows a short history of changing usage—itself a history of changing Western perceptions of Muslim reality. The Debut of Islamism The term Islamism first appeared in French in the mid­eighteenth century. But it did not refer to the modern ideological use of Islam, which had not yet come into being. Rather, it was a synonym for the religion of the Muslims, which was then known in French as mahométisme, the religion professed and taught by the Prophet Muhammad.
    [Show full text]
  • A U.S. Visa for an Islamic Extremist? | the Washington Institute
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 121 A U.S. Visa for an Islamic Extremist? by Martin Kramer Jun 30, 1994 ABOUT THE AUTHORS Martin Kramer Martin Kramer is The Washington Institute's Walter P. Stern Fellow and author of one of its most widely read monographs, Ivory Towers on Sand: The Failure of Middle Eastern Studies in America. Brief Analysis or nearly a year, Sheikh Rashid Ghanoushi has been seeking an American visa. Ghanoushi, the most F prominent Islamist in the West, is the leader of Al-Nahda (The Revival), Tunisia's major Islamist grouping. Al- Nahda is now banned in Tunisia, and Ghanoushi resides in Britain. He would like to visit the United States this summer, where he hopes to address religious and academic audiences. Until now, the U.S. government has denied him entry, because of his political views and the opposition of the Tunisian government. But Ghanoushi's visa application is currently under active review. Last week, Tunisia apparently indicated it would regard a U.S. decision to admit Ghanoushi as "a hostile act." Still, there are some who believe Ghanoushi's visit to the United States would send a positive signal to "moderate" Islamists everywhere, and provide an opening for a dialogue with them. But is Ghanoushi a "moderate?" In the past, Ghanoushi has urged violence against U.S. interests, and he continues to demand Israel's destruction. Might an American visit send precisely the wrong signal? Who Is Rashid Ghanoushi? Rashid Ghanoushi was born in 1941 in the south of Tunisia. As a student in Damascus and Paris, he embraced the doctrines of the Muslim Brotherhood, which he disseminated on his return to Tunisia.
    [Show full text]
  • MIDDLE EAST WATCH OVERVIEW Human Rights Developments The
    MIDDLE EAST WATCH OVERVIEW Human Rights Developments The Middle East and North Africa remain plagued by severe human rights problems. The torture of political detainees is commonplace, and often routine. Extrajudicial executions and executions after trials lacking in due process take place with regularity in Iraq, Iran and, to a lesser extent, Saudi Arabia. In the past, the Syrian authorities have been guilty of this abuse as well. Arguably, the killing of suspected militants in Egypt and the Israeli-occupied territories, when arrests could have been effectedCa feature of the civil strife plaguing both regionsCalso constitute extrajudicial executions by government agents. In counterpoint, armed underground groups often assassinate suspected opponents in these regions, as well as in Algeria. The officially sanctioned persecution of religious or ethnic minorities, or the absence of government protection in the face of attacks by members of the majority community, is an endemic problem in parts of the Middle East. For instance, during 1992, Palestinians and Bedoon residents of Kuwait endured unrelenting pressures aimed at forcing them out of the country; Baha'is and evangelical Christians faced renewed persecution in Iran. The arbitrary detention of government opponents is also rampant throughout the region. From Morocco to Iran, tens of thousands are in jail on politically motivated grounds; even the Kurdish authorities, ruling over an autonomous enclave of some 3.5 million people in northern Iraq, resorted in late 1992 to the detention without charge of hundreds of sympathizers of militant parties. The end of the Cold War and subsequent collapse of the Soviet Union transformed prospects for the promotion of human rights in the Middle East and North Africa (the Maghreb states).
    [Show full text]
  • Iran: Sponsoring Or Combating Terrorism?
    This is a repository copy of Iran: Sponsoring or Combating Terrorism?. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/150747/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Malakoutikhah, Z orcid.org/0000-0001-7804-9881 (2020) Iran: Sponsoring or Combating Terrorism? Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 43 (10). pp. 913-939. ISSN 1057-610X https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2018.1506560 © 2018 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. This is an author produced version of an article published in Studies in Conflict & Terrorism. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Iran: Sponsoring or Combating Terrorism? Zeynab Malakoutikhah PhD, University of Leeds [email protected] Abstract Iran has a longstanding connection with terrorism, in particular after the 1979 Islamic Revolution. It has been recognised as both a victim and state sponsor of terrorism, but has predominantly been accused of supporting terrorism worldwide.
    [Show full text]