Ciliophora, Litostomatea)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Zoologica Scripta New taxa refresh the phylogeny and classification of pleurostomatid ciliates (Ciliophora, Litostomatea) LEI WU,XIAOXIAO JIAO,ZHUO SHEN,ZHENZHEN YI,JIQIU LI,ALAN WARREN &XIAOFENG LIN Submitted: 2 February 2016 Wu, L., Jiao, X., Shen, Z., Yi, Z., Li, J., Warren, A. & Lin, X. (2016). New taxa refresh the Accepted: 22 April 2016 phylogeny and classification of pleurostomatid ciliates (Ciliophora, Litostomatea). doi:10.1111/zsc.12193 —Zoologica Scripta, 00: 000–000. A high diversity of pleurostomatid ciliates has been discovered in the last decade, and their systematics needs to be improved in the light of new findings concerning their morphology and molecular phylogeny. In this work, a new genus, Protolitonotus gen. n., and two new spe- cies, Protolitonotus magnus sp. n. and Protolitonotus longus sp. n., were studied. Furthermore, 19 novel nucleotide sequences of SSU rDNA, LSU rDNA and ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 were collected to determine the phylogenetic relationships and systematic positions of the pleurostomatid ciliates in this study. Based on both molecular and morphological data, the results demon- strated that: (i) as disclosed by the sequence analysis of SSU rDNA, LSU rDNA and ITS1- 5.8S-ITS2, Protolitonotus gen. n. is sister to all other pleurostomatids and thus represents an independent lineage and a separate family, Protolitonotidae fam. n., which is defined by the presence of a semi-suture formed by the right somatic kineties near the dorsal margin of the body; (ii) the families Litonotidae and Kentrophyllidae are both monophyletic based on both SSU rDNA and LSU rDNA sequences, whereas Amphileptidae are non-monophyletic in trees inferred from SSU rDNA sequences; and (iii) the genera Loxophyllum and Kentrophyllum are both monophyletic, whereas Litonotus is non-monophyletic based on SSU rDNA analy- ses. ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 sequence data were used for the phylogenetic analyses of pleurostom- atids for the first time; however, species relationships were less well resolved than in the SSU rDNA and LSU rDNA trees. In addition, a major revision to the classification of the order Pleurostomatida is suggested and a key to its families and genera is provided. Corresponding author: Xiaofeng Lin, Laboratory of Protozoology, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Subtropical Biodiversity and Biomonitoring, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China. E-mail: [email protected] Lei Wu, Xiaoxiao Jiao, Zhuo Shen, Zhenzhen Yi, and Jiqiu Li, Laboratory of Protozoology, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Subtropical Biodiversity and Biomonitoring, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China., E-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Alan Warren, Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Rd., London SW7 5BD, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Xiaofeng Lin, Laboratory of Protozoology, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Subtropical Biodiversity and Biomonitoring, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China. E-mail:[email protected] Introduction Traditionally, studies on pleurostomatids were based exclu- The Pleurostomatida, a species-rich order in the subclass sively on live observations which led to difficulties in species Haptoria, has proved to be more diverse than previously identification (Faure-Fremiet 1908; Kahl 1931, 1933; Dra- anticipated, and its taxonomy and molecular phylogeny have gesco 1954, 1960, 1965). With the application of the silver drawn much attention in the last decade (Lin et al. 2005a,b, staining, and the revelation of the ciliary pattern of pleu- c, 2007a,b, 2008a,b; Gao et al. 2008; Pan et al. 2010, 2013, rostomatids, the systematics of many ambiguous morpho- 2014; Vd’acny et al. 2010, 2011a,b, 2014; Zhang et al. 2012; types have been resolved and several new genera have been Wu et al. 2013, 2014, 2015a,b; Vd’acny et al. 2015). established (Petz et al. 1995; Lin & Song 2004; Lin et al. ª 2016 Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 1 Systematics of pleurostomatid ciliates L. Wu et al. 2005a, 2008a). According to Lynn (2008), the order Pleu- Semi-suture: a ciliary structure formed by the anterior rostomatida is divided into two families, Litonotidae and shortening of the right somatic kineties along full kin- Amphileptidae, based on the presence/absence of an anterior eties forming an incomplete suture – a characteristic suture formed by the right somatic kineties. Several new taxa feature of the family Protolitonotidae fam. n. have since been described, based on both morphology and small subunit ribosomal DNA (SSU rDNA) sequence data, Extraction, amplification and sequencing of DNA giving the opportunity to carry out phylogenetic and system- For each species, one or several identified cells were iso- atic analyses of pleurostomatids (Pan et al. 2010, 2013, 2014; lated and repeatedly washed in sterilized habitat water to Wu et al. 2013, 2014, 2015a,b; Vd’acny et al. 2014; Vd’acny remove contaminants, and transferred into 45 ll ATL buf- et al. 2015). As a result of these findings, three families are fer pending genomic DNA extraction. Their genomic recognized within the order Pleurostomatida: Litonotidae, DNA was extracted using a DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit Amphileptidae and Kentrophyllidae (Wu et al. 2015a). In (Qiagen, Shanghai, China) according to the protocol. PCR this study, we (i) describe two new species belonging to a amplification, SSU rDNA cloning and sequencing were newly established genus and family and sequence the SSU conducted according to the method described by Wu et al. rDNA of each; (ii) investigate phylogenetic relationships (2013). Primers for partial LSU rDNA gene amplification within the order Pleurostomatida based on sequence data of were 28S-F2 (50-ACSCGCTGRAYTTAAGCAT-30) and three markers, that is SSU rDNA, LSU rDNA and ITS1- 28S-R2 (50-AACCTTGGAGACCTGAT-30). The ITS1- 5.8S-ITS2; (iii) revise the classification of the pleurostom- 5.8S-ITS2 region was amplified using the forward primer atids; and (iv) provide a key to the identification of the fami- 5.8S-F (GTAGGTGAACCTGCGGAAGGATCATTA) lies and genera of the order Pleurostomatida. and the reverse primer 5.8S-R (TACTGATATGCT TAAGTTCAGCGG), with PCR conditions as follows: 35 cycles with denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s (initial denatura- Materials and methods tion for 5 min), primer annealing at 56 °C for 1 min and Collection and identification primer extension at 72 °C for 2 min (final extension for All the species for this study were collected from coastal 10 min). regions of southern China between December 2007 and December 2012 (sampling locations are listed in Table S1 Phylogenetic analyses in Supporting Information), and investigated in life and Apart from the newly sequenced species, the sequences stained with protargol following the method of Wilbert of the SSU rDNA, LSU rDNA and ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 (1975). Description of Protolitonotus magnus sp. n. and Pro- region used in phylogenetic analyses were obtained from tolitonotus longus sp. n. is in Supporting Information. the GenBank database. The three molecular markers of Amphileptus spiculatus, A. bellus, A. aeschtae and A. salignus litostomatean ciliates were unambiguously identified and were identified according to Wu et al. (2015b), Lin et al. aligned using CLUSTALW implemented in BIOEDIT (2007a) and Chen et al. (2011). Identification of Loxophyl- 7.0 (Hall 1999). The alignment was then modified by lum meridionale and L. chinense is according to Wu et al. removing highly variable regions, and refined manually (2013) and Pan et al. (2013). Kentrophyllum sp. 1 and sp. 2 by eye. The data sets used for phylogenetic inferences are as described in Wu et al. (2015a,b). Terminology is comprised 1568 characters for SSU rDNA, 1733 charac- according to Lynn (2008) and the present study. ters for LSU rDNA and 444 characters for ITS1-5.8S- The following specialized terms are used in the descrip- ITS2. The program MrModeltest v.2 (Nylander 2004) tion and remarks/comparison: selected the GTR + G + I evolutionary model under the Full-kinety: the rightmost kinety or kineties of the cell Akaike information criterion. Bayesian inference (BI) running the entire body length in protolitonotids. analysis was conducted with MrBayes 3.1.2 (Ronquist & Single-suture: a ciliary structure formed by the pro- Huelsenbeck 2003) using the aforementioned evolution gressive shortening of the medial somatic kineties on model, with a run of 1 300 000 generations at a sam- the right side forming a suture in the anterior part of pling frequency of 100 and a burn-in of 3250 (25%). body – a characteristic feature of the family Amphilep- Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis was carried out online tidae. on the CIPRES Portal V 1.15 (http://www.phylo.org), Double-suture: a ciliary structure formed by the pro- using RAxML with the parameters as described in Sta- gressive shortening of the right-medial somatic kin- matakis et al. (2008). The reliability of internal branches eties forming two sutures, one in the anterior body was assessed using the nonparametric bootstrap method, half and one in the posterior body half – a characteris- with 1000 replicates. Maximum parsimony (MP) analysis tic feature of the family Kentrophyllidae. was performed with PAUP 4.0b10 (Swofford 2002) using 2 ª 2016 Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences L. Wu et al. Systematics of pleurostomatid ciliates the tree-bisection–reconnection algorithm and bootstrap- studies (Wu et al. 2013, 2014, 2015a,b; Vd’acny et al. ping with 1000 replicates. 2015). Within this family, only the genus Loxophyllum is monophyletic in all three analyses (92% ML, 1.00 BI, 67% Results and discussion MP). The genera Acineria and Siroloxophyllum cluster Molecular data together to form a group that is sister to Loxophyllum with All new sequences have been deposited in the GenBank variable support (1.00 BI, 68% ML, 63% MP). The genus (for accession numbers, see Table S1). Protolitonotus longus Litonotus is paraphyletic when L. pictus is included. (ii) differs from P.