DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Amendment 4-2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Amendment 4-2020 PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT Job Name V_Messmate Make Address Messmate Road, Torquay NorthREPORT – Western Growth Area Version & Date Version D 24.07.2020 Author (s) Nicola Smith and Naomi Beck Checked By Nicola Smith FOR THE: This report is subject to copyrightCOUNTRY the owner of which CLUB is Niche Planning ESTATE Studio. All unauthorised copying or reproduction of this report or any part of it is forbidden by law and is subject to civil and criminal penalties as set out in the Copyright Act 1968. All requests for permission to reproduce this report or its contents must – PROSPECT VALE, LAUNCESTON be directed to Niche Planning Studio. Country Club Estate | Planning Scheme Amendment Request Page | 1 Job Name T_Country Club ER Address 100 Country Club Avenue, Prospect Vale TAS 7250 Version & Date Version v8 02.02.2021 Author (s) Nicola Smith, Jeremy Gammon, Olivia Cootes Checked By Nicola Smith This report is subject to copyright the owner of which is Niche Planning Studio. All unauthorised copying or reproduction of this report or any part of it is forbidden by law and is subject to civil and criminal penalties as set out in the Copyright Act 1968. All requests for permission to reproduce this report or its contents must be directed to Niche Planning Studio. Country Club Estate | Planning Scheme Amendment Request Page | 2 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................... 6 1. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................... 8 2. SUBJECT SITE AND SURROUNDS ............................................................................................................ 10 2.1. SUBJECT SITE .................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.2. REGIONAL CONTEXT ........................................................................................................................................ 12 2.3. LOCAL CONTEXT ............................................................................................................................................... 14 3. PLANNING CONTEXT ............................................................................................................................. 16 3.1. STRATEGIC CONTEXT ....................................................................................................................................... 16 3.2. STATUTORY CONTEXT – MEANDER VALLEY INTERIM PLANNING SCHEME ..................................................... 34 3.3. OVERLAYS ........................................................................................................................................................ 37 3.4. CODES .............................................................................................................................................................. 39 4. PROPOSED AMENDMENT ...................................................................................................................... 41 4.1. THE PROPOSAL................................................................................................................................................. 41 4.2. CONSULTATION AND ENGAGEMENT ............................................................................................................... 41 5. STRATEGIC JUSTIFICATION .................................................................................................................... 43 5.1. SECTION 32(E) - AVOIDING POTENTIAL LAND USE CONFLICT WITH USE AND DEVELOPMENT PERMISSIBLE UNDER A PLANNING SCHEME APPLYING IN THE ADJACENT MUNICIPAL AREA ........................................................ 44 5.2. SECTION 30(O) - BEING, WHERE PRACTICABLE, CONSISTENT WITH THE RELEVANT REGIONAL LAND USE STRATEGY AND ANY COMMON PROVISIONS (REQUIRED BY A PLANNING DIRECTIVE) OR OVERRIDING LOCAL PROVISIONS ............................................................................................................................................................... 45 5.3. SECTION 32(F) - HAVING REGARD TO THE IMPACT ON THE REGION IN ENVIRONMENTAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL TERMS ........................................................................................................................................................... 48 5.4. SECTIONS 20(2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8) AND (9) - BEING CONSISTENT WITH THE OVERARCHING REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANNING SCHEMES ............................................................................................................... 48 5.5. SECTION 21(1)(A) - FURTHER THE OBJECTIVES SET OUT IN SCHEDULE 1 WITHIN THE AREA COVERED BY THE SCHEME ..................................................................................................................................................................... 49 5.6. SECTION 21(1)(B) – BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE POLICIES MADE UNDER SECTION 11 OF THE STATE POLICIES AND PROJECTS ACT 1993 ............................................................................................................................ 51 5.7. SECTION 21(1)(D) - HAVE REGARD TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN OF A COUNCIL REFERRED TO IN DIVISION 2 OF PART 7 OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1993 AS ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL AT THE TIME THE PLANNING SCHEME IS PREPARED ................................................................................................................................................ 52 5.8. SECTION 21(1)(E) - HAVE REGARD TO THE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS SET OUT IN THE STANDARDS PRESCRIBED UNDER THE GAS PIPELINES ACT 2000 ........................................................................................................................ 52 6. COUNTRY CLUB SPECIFIC AREA PLAN (F6) .............................................................................................. 53 6.1. PROPOSED SAP ................................................................................................................................................ 53 6.2. SAP JUSTIFICATION .......................................................................................................................................... 57 7. CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................................ 60 Country Club Estate | Planning Scheme Amendment Request Page | 3 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: APPLICATION FORMS, OWNERS CONSENT AND TITLE CERTIFICATES ........................................ ….62 APPENDIX B: LETTERBOX DROP AND DOOR KNOCK PLANS……………………………………………………………………………..63 APPENDIX C: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN INTERIM PLANNING SCHEME AND TPS……………………………..64 APPENDIX D: RESIDENTIAL LAND DEMAND AND SUPPLY ASSESSMENT ……………………………………………………….…67 APPENDIX E: SITE HISTORY STATEMENT………………………………………………………………………………………………………….68 APPENDIX F: BUSHFIRE HAZARD MANAGEMENT PLAN ADVICE………………………………………………………………………69 APPENDIX G: NATURAL VALUES ASSESSMENT…………………………………………………………………………………………………70 APPENDIX H: LANDSCAPE VISUAL IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT………………………………………………………………………...71 APPENDIX I: TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT…………………………………………………………………………………………………...72 APPENDIX J1: SERVICES REPORT…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…73 APPENDIX J2: CIVIL PLAN SET……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…74 APPENDIX K1: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN…………………………………………………………………………………….…75 APPENDIX K2: STORMWATER RFI RESPONSE LETTER…………………………………………………………………………………..….76 APPENDIX L: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION…………………………………………………………………………………………………77 APPENDIX M1: CONCEPT LANDSCAPE DESIGN………………………………………………………………………………………………..78 APPENDIX M2: CONCEPT LANDSCAPE PLAN………….……………………………………………………………………………………..…79 APPENDIX N1: SPECIFIC AREA PLAN ORDINANCE…………………………………………………………………………………………….80 APPENDIX N2: SAP PLAN…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………86 FIGURES FIGURE 1: SUBJECT SITE AERIAL ........................................................................................................................... 9 FIGURE 2: LAND OWNERSHIP DETAILS & SUBJECT SITE ..................................................................................... 11 FIGURE 3: REGIONAL CONTEXT PLAN ................................................................................................................ 13 FIGURE 4: LOCAL CONTEXT PLAN ...................................................................................................................... 15 FIGURE 5: MAP D.1 REGIONAL FRAMEWORK PLAN ........................................................................................... 23 FIGURE 6: PROSPECT VALE BLACKSTONE HEIGHTS FRAMEWORK PLAN ............................................................ 31 FIGURE 7: IDENTIFICATION OF USES WITHIN 50M BUFFER OF SAP ................................................................... 35 FIGURE 7: CURRENT ZONING PLAN .................................................................................................................... 36 FIGURE 8: CURRENT OVERLAY PLAN……………………………………..………………………………………………………………………..38 FIGURE 9: SCHEME AMENDMENT PLAN ............................................................................................................ 42 FIGURE 10: SPECIFIC AREA PLAN ....................................................................................................................... 54 FIGURE 11:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prasophyllum Tunbridgense
    THREATENED SPECIES SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Established under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 The Minister’s delegate approved this Conservation Advice on 01/04/2016. Conservation Advice Prasophyllum tunbridgense Tunbridge leek-orchid Conservation Status Prasophyllum tunbridgense (Tunbridge leek-orchid) is listed as Endangered under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth) (EPBC Act). The species is eligible for listing as prior to the commencement of the EPBC Act, it was listed as Endangered under Schedule 1 of the Endangered Species Protection Act 1992 (Cwlth). The main factors that are the cause of the species being eligible for listing in the Endangered category are its restricted geographic distribution is precarious for its survival due to its restricted extent of occurrence and area of occupancy, and low number of mature individuals. Prasophyllum tunbridgense (Tunbridge leek-orchid) is listed as Endangered under the Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 (Tasmania). Description The Tunbridge leek-orchid belongs to a group of orchids commonly known as leek orchids because the erect hollow leaf resembles that of a leek. Prasophyllum species are herbaceous perennial terrestrials with small, fleshy, round or oval tubers and a few fleshy, irregular roots. Most species are dormant over summer and autumn and begin growth in early winter. The single leaf is reddish at the base as opposed to green as in onion orchids (Microtis species). The flower spike emerges through the side of the leaf above the middle, with the portion of leaf above the point of emergence being free and often withered by the time the flowers open.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER?
    Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology ISSN: 1409-3871 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica BACKHOUSE, GARY N. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology, vol. 7, núm. 1-2, marzo, 2007, pp. 28- 43 Universidad de Costa Rica Cartago, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44339813005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative LANKESTERIANA 7(1-2): 28-43. 2007. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA GARY N. BACKHOUSE Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Division, Department of Sustainability and Environment 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002 Australia [email protected] KEY WORDS:threatened orchids Australia conservation status Introduction Many orchid species are included in this list. This paper examines the listing process for threatened Australia has about 1700 species of orchids, com- orchids in Australia, compares regional and national prising about 1300 named species in about 190 gen- lists of threatened orchids, and provides recommen- era, plus at least 400 undescribed species (Jones dations for improving the process of listing regionally 2006, pers. comm.). About 1400 species (82%) are and nationally threatened orchids. geophytes, almost all deciduous, seasonal species, while 300 species (18%) are evergreen epiphytes Methods and/or lithophytes. At least 95% of this orchid flora is endemic to Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Management and Restoration of Native Grassy Woodland in the Midlands Of
    Management and restoration of native grassy woodland in the Midlands of ..I Tasmania by ~ob~,k Andrew Zacharek B. Sc., Grad. Dip. Env. Stud. (Hons) f\. Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Geography and Environmental Studies University of Tasmania Hobart March 1997 i Declaration This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any tertiary institution and to the best of my knowledge and belief, the thesis contains no material previously published or written by another person, except when due reference is made in the text. Andrew Zacharek ii Abstract This thesis examines the effects of agricultural and conservation management practices on grassy communities in the sub-humid, low altitude Midlands of Tasmania. The results of an extensive survey were examined to assess the effects of grazing by sheep and cattle, fertilisation and the introduction of exotic pasture species on the grassy communities. Sites were classified according to the degree of pasture conversion and the level of the main limiting nutrient phosphorus, by annual rainfall and by geological substrate. Exotic species replaced native species with increasing degrees of pasture conversion and levels of phosphorus. Effects of management varied rainfall and different geological substrates. Raunkiaer life-form groups were a useful aid in the identification of patterns of species' responses. Exotic therophytes and flat/versatile rosette hemicryptophytes were the most invasive exotic life-forms in native communities. The native species in the flat/versatile rosette and caespitose hemicryptophyte life-form groups were the most tolerant of disturbance.
    [Show full text]
  • Rangelands, Western Australia
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Species List
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • AUSTRALIAN ORCHID NAME INDEX (27/4/2006) by Mark A. Clements
    AUSTRALIAN ORCHID NAME INDEX (27/4/2006) by Mark A. Clements and David L. Jones Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research/Australian National Herbarium GPO Box 1600 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia Corresponding author: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The Australian Orchid Name Index (AONI) provides the currently accepted scientific names, together with their synonyms, of all Australian orchids including those in external territories. The appropriate scientific name for each orchid taxon is based on data published in the scientific or historical literature, and/or from study of the relevant type specimens or illustrations and study of taxa as herbarium specimens, in the field or in the living state. Structure of the index: Genera and species are listed alphabetically. Accepted names for taxa are in bold, followed by the author(s), place and date of publication, details of the type(s), including where it is held and assessment of its status. The institution(s) where type specimen(s) are housed are recorded using the international codes for Herbaria (Appendix 1) as listed in Holmgren et al’s Index Herbariorum (1981) continuously updated, see [http://sciweb.nybg.org/science2/IndexHerbariorum.asp]. Citation of authors follows Brummit & Powell (1992) Authors of Plant Names; for book abbreviations, the standard is Taxonomic Literature, 2nd edn. (Stafleu & Cowan 1976-88; supplements, 1992-2000); and periodicals are abbreviated according to B-P-H/S (Bridson, 1992) [http://www.ipni.org/index.html]. Synonyms are provided with relevant information on place of publication and details of the type(s). They are indented and listed in chronological order under the accepted taxon name.
    [Show full text]
  • Flowering Times of Tasmanian Orchids: a Practical Guide for Field Botanists
    Flowering Times of Tasmanian Orchids: A Practical Guide for Field Botanists Mark Wapstra (Environmental Consulting Options Tasmania, ECOtas) 4th Edition, July 2018 Flowering Times of Tasmanian Orchids: A Practical Guide for Field Botanists 4th Edition (July 2018) MARK WAPSTRA Flowering Times of Tasmanian Orchids: A Practical Guide for Field Botanists FOREWORD TO FIRST EDITION (2008) This document fills a significant gap in the Tasmanian orchid literature. Given the inherent difficulties in locating and surveying orchids in their natural habitat, an accurate guide to their flowering times will be an invaluable tool to field botanists, consultants and orchid enthusiasts alike. Flowering Times of Tasmanian Orchids: A Practical Guide for Field Botanists has been developed by Tasmania’s leading orchid experts, drawing collectively on many decades of field experience. The result is the most comprehensive State reference on orchid flowering available. By virtue of its ease of use, accessibility and identification of accurate windows for locating our often-cryptic orchids, it will actually assist in conservation by enabling land managers and consultants to more easily comply with the survey requirements of a range of land-use planning processes. The use of this guide will enhance efforts to locate new populations and increase our understanding of the distribution of orchid species. The Threatened Species Section commends this guide and strongly recommends its use as a reference whenever surveys for orchids are undertaken. Matthew Larcombe Project Officer (Threatened Orchid and Euphrasia) Threatened Species Section, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water & Environment March 2008 DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY This document is freely available as a PDF file downloadable from the following websites: www.fpa.tas.gov.au; www.dpipwe.tas.gov.au; www.ecotas.com.au.
    [Show full text]
  • Flowering Times of Tasmanian Orchids: a Practical Guide for Field Botanists
    Flowering Times of Tasmanian Orchids: A Practical Guide for Field Botanists 0 Flowering Times of Tasmanian Orchids: A Practical Guide for Field Botanists FOREWORD This document fills a significant gap in the Tasmanian orchid literature. Given the inherent difficulties in locating and surveying orchids in their natural habitat, an accurate guide to their flowering times will be an invaluable tool to field botanists, consultants and orchid enthusiasts alike. Flowering Times of Tasmanian Orchids: A Practical Guide for Field Botanists has been developed by Tasmania’s leading orchid experts, drawing collectively on many decades of field experience. The result is the most comprehensive State reference on orchid flowering available. By virtue of its ease of use, accessibility and identification of accurate windows for locating our often-cryptic orchids, it will actually assist in conservation by enabling land managers and consultants to more easily comply with the survey requirements of a range of land-use planning processes. The use of this guide will enhance efforts to locate new populations and increase our understanding of the distribution of orchid species. The Threatened Species Section commends this guide and strongly recommends its use as a reference whenever surveys for orchids are undertaken. Matthew Larcombe Project Officer (Threatened Orchid and Euphrasia) Threatened Species Section, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water & Environment March 2008 DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY This document is available as a PDF file downloadable from the following websites: www.fpa.tas.gov.au www.dpipwe.tas.gov.au www.ecotas.com.au It may also be requested directly from the authors (see contact details below).
    [Show full text]
  • Extinct’ Is an Emotive Word
    The Tasmanian Naturalist (2006) 128: 61-85 61 FINDING A BOTANICAL LAZARUS: TALES OF TASMANIAN PLANT SPECIES ‘RISEN FROM THE DEAD’ Mark Wapstra1, Fred Duncan2, Alex Buchanan3 and Richard Schahinger4 1 Environmental Consulting Options Tasmania, Lenah Valley. Email: [email protected]. 2 Forest Practices Authority, Hobart. 3 Tasmanian Herbarium , Hobart. 4 Threatened Species Section, Biodiversity Conser- vation Branch, Department of Primary Industries and Water, Hobart. INTRODUCTION ‘Extinct’ is an emotive word. For many people it conjures up images of do- dos and thylacines (but very rarely does the image of a cryptic shrub or herb pop into people’s minds). As humans, we don’t want any species to become extinct: witness the recent scientific and media interest in the Tasmanian devil being ravaged by the facial tumour disease. Unfortunately, every country in the world is ‘home’ to extinct plants and animals, and Tasmania is no different. Currently there are around 30 species listed as ‘presumed extinct’ on the Tasmanian Threatened Species Protection Act 1995, including 4 birds, 1 mammal, 1 beetle, 2 caddisflies, 1 spider, 1 lichen, 15 dicotyledons, 4 mono- cotyledons and 1 fern. Unfortunately, we simply know that some of these are more than just ‘presumed extinct’ – there would be few scientists argu- ing that the King Island emu is still alive in some unsurveyed corner of the island. But other species are exactly that: ‘presumed extinct. For example, until recently (1996), the delightfully named southern hairy red snail (Aus- trochloritis victoriae) was listed as ‘presumed extinct’ (had not been col- lected since the 1920s). That was until Tasmanian terrestrial snail expert Kevin Bonham rediscovered the species on King Island (Bonham, 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • The Flora of Township Lagoon Nature Reserve and Its Management, Tunbridge, Tasmania
    Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, Volume 131, 1997 57 THE FLORA OF TOWNSHIP LAGOON NATURE RESERVE AND ITS MANAGEMENT, TUNBRIDGE, TASMANIA by Andrew Zacharek, L. Gilfedder and S. Harris (with four tables, four text-figures, two plates and an appendix) ZACHAREK, A.R., G!LFEDDER, L. & HARRIS, S., 1997 (31 :viii): The flora of Township Lagoon Nature Reserve and its management, Tunbridge, Tasmania. Pap. Proc. R. Soc. Tasm. 131: 57-66. https://doi.org/10.26749/rstpp.131.57 ISSN 0800-4703. Department of Geography and Environmental Srudies, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252-78, Hobart 7001 (AZ); Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment and Land Management, GPO Box A, Hobart 7001 (SH, LG), formerly Department of Geography and Environmental Studies (LG). Township Lagoon Nature Reserve is 16 ha of remnant native grassland in the lowest rainfall area of Tasmania. A high proportion of rare and threatened species occurs within the reserve. They comprise fourendangered species, including rhree endangered at the national level, four vulnerable species and eight rare species, seven of the above being daisies. There is a strong floristicaffinity with the semi-arid mallee ground flora in northwestern Victoria and western New South Wales. The small grassland remnant comprises fivefloristic communities, the principal influences on floristicvariation being exerted by soil factors,such as geology, pH and drainage, and past history of mechanical disturbance and rubbish dumping. Active conservation management, that is favourable to the continued existence of vulnerable and rare species, promotes normal ecosystem functions and prevents threatening processes, is essential. Key Words: vegetation, nature reserve, salt lake, weeds, rare and threatened plants, low rainfallflora, Tasmania.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for Tasmanian Threatened Orchids
    DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES AND WATER Threatened Tasmanian Orchids Flora Recovery Plan 2006 - 2010 Threatened Tasmanian Orchid Flora Recovery Plan 2006-2010 1 DISCLAIMER This recovery plan has been prepared under the provisions of both the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) and the Tasmanian Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 (TSP Act). There are 68 orchid species covered by this plan, of which 34 are listed as threatened under both State and Commonwealth legislation, the remaining listed as rare or threatened under the TSP Act only. Twenty of the orchid species covered by this plan are endemic to Tasmania. For those species that also occur in other states this plan addresses the Tasmanian populations only. Adoption as a national recovery plan under the EPBC Act refers only to species listed under the EPBC Act. The taxonomy of orchids is constantly being revised. Should a species covered by this plan be split into several taxa all populations will remain covered by this plan under the original listing of the species. In the event of new orchid species being listed the content and actions of this plan will also be relevant to those new species, however this plan will then require revision to include the new species. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This plan was prepared by Aaron Dalgleish with assistance and advice from Wendy Potts (TSS), Sally Bryant (TSS), Hans and Anne Wapstra, David Ziegeler, Andrew Pritchard (DSE) and Richard Schahinger (TSS). Fiona Coates (DSE), Gary French (PV), Brendon Sullivan (PV) and Andrew Batty (BGPA) provided valuable information concerning existing orchid recovery programs in other states.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Summary: Swan, Western Australia
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]