DOCSLIB.ORG

The Flora of Township Lagoon Nature Reserve and Its Management, Tunbridge, Tasmania

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Flora of Township Lagoon Nature Reserve and Its Management, Tunbridge, Tasmania Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, Volume 131, 1997 57 THE FLORA OF TOWNSHIP LAGOON NATURE RESERVE AND ITS MANAGEMENT, TUNBRIDGE, TASMANIA by Andrew Zacharek, L. Gilfedder and S. Harris (with four tables, four text-figures, two plates and an appendix) ZACHAREK, A.R., G!LFEDDER, L. & HARRIS, S., 1997 (31 :viii): The flora of Township Lagoon Nature Reserve and its management, Tunbridge, Tasmania. Pap. Proc. R. Soc. Tasm. 131: 57-66. https://doi.org/10.26749/rstpp.131.57 ISSN 0800-4703. Department of Geography and Environmental Srudies, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252-78, Hobart 7001 (AZ); Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment and Land Management, GPO Box A, Hobart 7001 (SH, LG), formerly Department of Geography and Environmental Studies (LG). Township Lagoon Nature Reserve is 16 ha of remnant native grassland in the lowest rainfall area of Tasmania. A high proportion of rare and threatened species occurs within the reserve. They comprise fourendangered species, including rhree endangered at the national level, four vulnerable species and eight rare species, seven of the above being daisies. There is a strong floristicaffinity with the semi-arid mallee ground flora in northwestern Victoria and western New South Wales. The small grassland remnant comprises fivefloristic communities, the principal influences on floristicvariation being exerted by soil factors,such as geology, pH and drainage, and past history of mechanical disturbance and rubbish dumping. Active conservation management, that is favourable to the continued existence of vulnerable and rare species, promotes normal ecosystem functions and prevents threatening processes, is essential. Key Words: vegetation, nature reserve, salt lake, weeds, rare and threatened plants, low rainfallflora, Tasmania. INTRODUCTION clitellata Bayly also occur at Township Lagoon (Buckney & Tyler 1976). Township Lagoon Nature Reserve at Tunbridge in the The aims of this study are to produce an inventory of the southern Tasmanian Midlands, is a native grassland and flora, to describe the vegetation communities, to gain grassy woodland remnant dominated mainly by kangaroo understanding of the environmental factors, including the grass (Themeda triandra). An early painting of the Salt Pan role of fire, and to make preliminary recommendations on Plains by Joseph Lycett indicates that the pre-European management of the reserve. vegetation of the area was a treeless grassy plain (Fensham 1989). Township Lagoon Nature Reserve is listed on the Register of the National Estate and also protects one of only MATERIALS AND METHODS four natural salt lakes that occur in Tasmania. Natural grasslands and grassy woodlands were once extensive in the The Study Area lowlands of the Midlands, but today the natural vegetation has been dramatically altered, with only 13% of the vegetation Township Lagoon Nature Reserve (fig. 1; pis 1, 2)is an area resembling the original remaining and virtually all of this of approximately 16 ha which was set aside for the expansion privately owned (e.g. Fensham & Kirkpatrick 1989, Gilfedder of the town ofTunbridge and remained unallocated crown & Kirkpatrick 19956). The Midlands were arguably the land until the mid-l980s, when its conservation significance birthplace of the agricultural and pastoral industries in was recognised.The area was proclaimed as a Nature Reserve Australia. InTasmania, grasslands and grassy woodlands are on 25 December 1991. the most threatened vegetation type, with 22 of the 37 The climate of the Tunbridge district is dry subhumid communities described forTasmania being unprotected in cool (Gentilli 1972), characterised by a long warm season any national park or state reserve (Kirkpatrick et al. 1988). and peak rainfall in the spring and autumn. This is one of There is a high concentration of rare and threatened plant the lowest rainfall areas in the state, with a mean annual taxa in the Midlands (Kirkpatrick et al. 1988, Gilfedder rainfall of 462 mm per annum (table 1). The mean daily ° 1990), including many species that are not protected in any minimum temperature for the coldest month is 1.1 C; the other state reserve (Kirkpatrick et al. 1991 a, b).The reserve mean daily maximum temperature for the warmest month ° has been recognised as an important grassland remnant is 22.6 C (table 1). Annual rainfall for 1990-92 and 1994- (Kirkpatrick et al. 1988; Kirkpatrick et al. 199la). It is an 96 has been, on average, 430 mm, which is 93% of the important locality for the glossy tussock lizard Pseudemoia long-term average, indicating the unreliability of rainfall pagenstecheri (Rounsevell et al.1 996), the isopod, Haloniscus (fig. 2). searlei (Fulton 1976) and a recently rediscovered moth The reserve is underlain byTertiary basalt in the elevated (Chrysolarentiadecisaria) and rare grasshopper (Brachyxema areas of the reserve. The basalt overlies Triassic sediments lobipennis) (P. McQuillan, pers. comm.). The area is an which crop out in the lower areas around and to the east important fauna! refuge for rare invertebrates. Two of the lagoon. The site is at approximately 200-240 m crustaceans recorded from saline waters on mainland Australia elevation. The soils consist of clay and very dark-brown to have their only knownTasmanian occurrences atTownship black, duplex clay loam, and are fertile, with moderate to Lagoon (Fulton 1976). They are the isopod Haloniscus high permeability (Davies 1988). searlei Chilton and the ostracod Australocypris robusta De The reserve was leased for stock-grazing until the 1 960s Deckker.The water fleas Diacypris sp. nova and Calamoecia and is at present irregularly and lightly grazed. Patches of 58 A. Zacharek, L. Gilfedder and S. Harris \ \ 0 6 I +;~ °1 Of? I 0, I ,I 0,/ ·'0 I °3 I I I I I / °4 I I'~ J I ,-/ I +28 °'0 \ / .... °11 °12 --\...-- 222... 1_ I I °'5 .'3 Township Lagoon 230 I I 220 / +26 I I 1J / • ..- / I 34 °16 l+27 ""- , 3D PLATE 1 ' .... "\ ........ I View looking south with Themeda triandra grassland with " 8 24/ "\ -37 abundant flowering heads of Chrysocephalum apiculatum °17 \ \ at Township Lagoon Nature Reserve, Tunbridge (Dec. 1991). • Puccinel!ia stricta open grassland/herbfield Photo: A. Zacharek. D Cafocept/alus lacleus open grassland o + Latium perenne~Plantago lanceo/afa open grassland • Poa labiflardierei-Dicondra repens tussock grassland o Eucalyptus vimfnalis/E Gvata/E. pauciflora­ Convolvulus erubescens grassy woodland Location of transect Contours in metres 100m 1 FIG. 1 - Township Lagoon Nature Reserve at Tunbridge in the Midlands of Tasmania (42"8 '5, 147"15 'E). PLATE 2 Looking east toward Township Lagoon across Themeda triandra grassland (Dec. 1991). Photo: A. Zacharek. 140 120 100 :2 C 0 E 80 E -S (ii 60 C '(ij a: 40 20 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 FIG. 2 - Mean monthly rainfall at Tunbridge, 1990-March 1997; the long-term monthly average is calculated from Bureau ofMeteorology data covering the period 1912-97. Annual precipitation totals were 443mm (J 990), 421 mm (J 991), 494 mm (J 992), 270 mm (J 994), 413 mm (J 995) and 545 mm (J 996); the 1993 data is incomplete. Monthly precipitation is indicated by bars and the line indicates the long-term monthly average. Flora of Township Lagoon Nature Reserve, Tasmania 59 TABLE 1 Summary of precipitation and rain days for Tunbridge* and temperature data for Rosst Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 5ep Oct Nov Dec Annual total Tunbridge* total monthly precipitation Mean 43.3 19.5 33.4 39.3 37.2 32.9 41.0 40.7 39.3 40.8 44.2 44.4 461.5 Highest 124 62.0 75.2 94.6 92.0 76.0 103.6 83.8 116.6 73.6 110.8 140.2 633.5 Lowest 4.8 0.0 3.2 5.6 4.2 11.2 11.4 3.8 9.6 13.0 7.6 6.0 269.6 Number 24 23 24 23 23 24 24 24 25 25 25 25 22 Tunbridge * raindays Mean 7.8 5.0 7.5 9.5 10.4 11.5 12.9 13.0 11.5 10.9 10.3 9.3 119.8 Highest 12 11 12 17 16 14 20 20 19 22 16 23 138 Lowest 4 0 2 4 5 8 7 3 2 5 4 2 95 Number 24 23 24 23 23 24 24 24 25 25 24 25 22 Ross!' summary of daily temperature Mean daily max. temp. 22.6 22.1 20.3 16.1 13.7 10.9 10.5 11.9 13.0 16.7 18.2 21.7 16.5 Highest temp. 34.6 34.0 28.8 23.2 18.7 15.8 15.7 18.0 19.7 28.8 26.6 33.9 34.6 Lowest Max. temp. 14.4 13.1 12.6 9.9 8.7 5.7 4.3 7.9 7.7 10.1 10.4 13.4 4.3 Mean daily min. temp. 10.2 10.1 7.1 5.6 2.7 1.5 1.1 2.3 2.5 4.9 6.1 8.0 5.2 Highest min temp. 18.9 18.9 14.8 15.8 12.1 12.5 9.6 10.0 10.2 12.4 12.9 17.2 18.9 Lowest temp. 0.5 1.5 -1.6 -4.3 -5.9 -6.6 -6.2 -5.8 -4.2 -3.2 -1.5 -2.5 -6.6 * Cheam (42°0T5, 147"21 'E), elevation 220 m; available data 1972-97. t 42°02'5, 147"30'E, elevation 195 m; data 1993-97. native grassland and grassy woodland in paddocks adjacent soil-testing kit. and to the west, south and north of the reserve are The polythetic divisive classification program contiguous with the grasslands of the nature reserve.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Catalogue Outside 180 Red X4.Cdr
    Eremophila bignoniiflora - Creek Wilga * Callitris glaucophylla - Murray Pine S K FTHO Eremophila deserti - Turkey Bush * Callitris gracilis - Slender Cypress Pine FT HO WILDFLOWERS FOR CUT FLOWERS Eremophila longifolia - Berrigan Emu Bush * Callitris rhomboidea - Port Jackson Pine FTHO These plants available all year, fresh cut flowers avaliable in season. Eremophila maculata * Callitris verrucosa M Exocarpos cupressiformis * Eucalyptus albens - White Box FTHO Acacia cultriformis - Cut-leaf Wattle - yellow Eucalyptus crenulata, E. gunnii, E. pulverulenta, Exocarpos stricta - Pale Fruit Ballart * Eucalyptus angulosa M Acacia merinthophora - yellow E. albida and E. - ‘Moon Lagoon’ - silver/blue foliage Geijera parviflora - Wilga * Eucalyptus aromaphloia - Scent Bark FTHO Actinotus helianthi - Flannel Flower - cream * Grevillea - 'Evelyn's Coronet' - pink/grey * Goodenia ovata - Hop Goodenia * W Eucalyptus baxteri - Brown Stringybark FTHO Agonis linearifolia - white Grevillea - 'Sylvia' - pink NATIVE NURSERY Goodia lotifolia - Golden Tip Eucalyptus behriana - Bull Mallee K FTHO Agonis parviceps - white Guichenotia macrantha - *Large-flowered Guichenotia - mauve Goodia medicaginea - Western Golden Tip R Eucalyptus blakelyi - Blakely's Red Gum FTHO Anigozanthos - Kangaroo Paws - red, orange, pink, Hakea multilineata - Grass-leaved Hakea - pink * Hakea decurrens subsp. physocarpa - Bushy Needlewood Eucalyptus calycogona - Red Mallee M FTHO yellow or green * Hypocalymma angustifolium - White Myrtle - cream * Hakea leucoptera M Eucalyptus camaldulensis
    [Show full text]
  • Prasophyllum Tunbridgense
    THREATENED SPECIES SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Established under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 The Minister’s delegate approved this Conservation Advice on 01/04/2016. Conservation Advice Prasophyllum tunbridgense Tunbridge leek-orchid Conservation Status Prasophyllum tunbridgense (Tunbridge leek-orchid) is listed as Endangered under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth) (EPBC Act). The species is eligible for listing as prior to the commencement of the EPBC Act, it was listed as Endangered under Schedule 1 of the Endangered Species Protection Act 1992 (Cwlth). The main factors that are the cause of the species being eligible for listing in the Endangered category are its restricted geographic distribution is precarious for its survival due to its restricted extent of occurrence and area of occupancy, and low number of mature individuals. Prasophyllum tunbridgense (Tunbridge leek-orchid) is listed as Endangered under the Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 (Tasmania). Description The Tunbridge leek-orchid belongs to a group of orchids commonly known as leek orchids because the erect hollow leaf resembles that of a leek. Prasophyllum species are herbaceous perennial terrestrials with small, fleshy, round or oval tubers and a few fleshy, irregular roots. Most species are dormant over summer and autumn and begin growth in early winter. The single leaf is reddish at the base as opposed to green as in onion orchids (Microtis species). The flower spike emerges through the side of the leaf above the middle, with the portion of leaf above the point of emergence being free and often withered by the time the flowers open.
    [Show full text]
  • Stormwater Connections to Natural Waterways Rouse Hill Development Area
    Stormwater connections to natural waterways Rouse Hill Development Area Overview What This guide explains what you need to do when building a stormwater connection into Sydney Water’s natural open channel waterways in the Rouse Hill Development Area (RHDA). We allow stormwater connections that ensure: stable transition from a constructed drainage system to the natural waterway sustainable water quality management restoration of vegetation following construction. Who This guide applies to owners and developers proposing to build a stormwater pipe connecting to a waterway owned or managed by Sydney Water in the RHDA. This applies to connection proposals for residential, commercial, industrial and other government agencies (e.g. Roads and Maritime Services) developments. Why Construction of stormwater connections to natural waterways affects the waterway and the riparian corridor. This guide ensures that owners and developers design and construct stormwater connections to a safe and sustainable standard by: minimising the number of uncontrolled stormwater discharges ensuring new stormwater connections cause minimal environmental impact to the waterway and its water quality restoring and maintaining disturbed waterfront and riparian vegetation following construction activities. Document current at 31 July 2014 Page 1 Sydney Water – Stormwater connections to natural waterways – Rouse Hill Development Area Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Approval requirements 3 Connecting to any waterway 3 Connecting to a Sydney Water waterway 3 3. Stormwater connection design 4 Point of connection 4 Drainage system 4 Outlet headwall 5 Asset ownership 6 4. Land and vegetation restoration 7 5. Submission requirements 9 6. Design drawings 10 Headwall setback from creek channel – montage 10 Headwall setback from creek channel – plan 11 Headwall setback from creek channel – elevation 12 Headwall setback from creek channel – section 13 Soil horizons – montage 14 Appropriate revegetation – plan and section elevation 15 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER?
    Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology ISSN: 1409-3871 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica BACKHOUSE, GARY N. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology, vol. 7, núm. 1-2, marzo, 2007, pp. 28- 43 Universidad de Costa Rica Cartago, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44339813005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative LANKESTERIANA 7(1-2): 28-43. 2007. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA GARY N. BACKHOUSE Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Division, Department of Sustainability and Environment 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002 Australia [email protected] KEY WORDS:threatened orchids Australia conservation status Introduction Many orchid species are included in this list. This paper examines the listing process for threatened Australia has about 1700 species of orchids, com- orchids in Australia, compares regional and national prising about 1300 named species in about 190 gen- lists of threatened orchids, and provides recommen- era, plus at least 400 undescribed species (Jones dations for improving the process of listing regionally 2006, pers. comm.). About 1400 species (82%) are and nationally threatened orchids. geophytes, almost all deciduous, seasonal species, while 300 species (18%) are evergreen epiphytes Methods and/or lithophytes. At least 95% of this orchid flora is endemic to Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Survey Guidelines for Australia's Threatened Orchids
    SURVEY GUIDELINES FOR AUSTRALIA’S THREATENED ORCHIDS GUIDELINES FOR DETECTING ORCHIDS LISTED AS ‘THREATENED’ UNDER THE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AND BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ACT 1999 0 Authorship and acknowledgements A number of experts have shared their knowledge and experience for the purpose of preparing these guidelines, including Allanna Chant (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), Allison Woolley (Tasmanian Department of Primary Industry, Parks, Water and Environment), Andrew Brown (Western Australian Department of Environment and Conservation), Annabel Wheeler (Australian Biological Resources Study, Australian Department of the Environment), Anne Harris (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), David T. Liddle (Northern Territory Department of Land Resource Management, and Top End Native Plant Society), Doug Bickerton (South Australian Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources), John Briggs (New South Wales Office of Environment and Heritage), Luke Johnston (Australian Capital Territory Environment and Sustainable Development Directorate), Sophie Petit (School of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia), Melanie Smith (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), Oisín Sweeney (South Australian Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources), Richard Schahinger (Tasmanian Department of Primary Industry, Parks, Water and Environment). Disclaimer The views and opinions contained in this document are not necessarily those of the Australian Government. The contents of this document have been compiled using a range of source materials and while reasonable care has been taken in its compilation, the Australian Government does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this document and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of the document.
    [Show full text]
  • ACT, Australian Capital Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vegetation Communities Native Grassland
    Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark The Vegetation Communities Native grassland Themeda australis Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark (revised - October 2017) 1 Native grassland Community (Code) Page Coastal grass and herbfield (GHC) 5 Highland Poa grassland (GPH) 7 Lowland grassland complex (GCL) 9 Lowland grassy sedgeland (GSL) 11 Lowland Poa labillardierei grassland (GPL) 12 Lowland Themeda triandra grassland (GTL) 14 Rockplate grassland (GRP) 16 General description align the key and the description of Lowland grassland complex ( ) with respect to the Native grasslands are defined as areas of native GCL required cover of native grass species. In 2017 vegetation dominated by native grasses with few or further minor revisions were made to improve no emergent woody species. Different types of information for general management issues, and to native grassland can be found in a variety of habitats, improve the description of Coastal grass and including coastal fore-dunes, dry slopes and valley herbfield (GHC) and its differentiation from Lowland bottoms, rock plates and subalpine flats. The lowland Poa labillardierei grassland (GPL). This is reflected in temperate grassland types have been recognised as the key to this Section. some of the most threatened vegetation communities in Australia. General management issues Some areas of native grassland are human-induced Most lowland native grassland in Tasmania has been and exist as a result of heavy burning, tree clearing cleared for agriculture since European settlement or dieback of the tree layer in grassy woodlands. (Barker 1999, Gilfedder 1990, Kirkpatrick et al. 1988, There are seven grassland communities recognised Kirkpatrick 1991, Williams et al. 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • A Vegetation Map of the Western Gawler Ranges, South Australia 2001 ______
    ____________________________________________________ A VEGETATION MAP OF THE WESTERN GAWLER RANGES, SOUTH AUSTRALIA 2001 ____________________________________________________ by T. J. Hudspith, A. C. Robinson and P.J. Lang Biodiversity Survey and Monitoring National Parks and Wildlife, South Australia Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia 2001 ____________________________________________________ i Research and the collation of information presented in this report was undertaken by the South Australian Government through its Biological Survey of South Australia Program. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not reflect those of the South Australian Government or the Minister for Environment and Heritage. The report may be cited as: Hudspith, T. J., Robinson, A. C. and Lang, P. J. (2001) A Vegetation Map of the Western Gawler Ranges, South Australia (National Parks and Wildlife, South Australia, Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia). ISBN 0 7590 1029 3 Copies may be borrowed from the library: The Housing, Environment and Planning Library located at: Level 1, Roma Mitchell Building, 136 North Terrace (GPO Box 1669) ADELAIDE SA 5001 Cover Photograph: A typical Triodia covered hillslope on Thurlga Station, Gawler Ranges, South Australia. Photo: A. C. Robinson. ii _______________________________________________________________________________________________ A Vegetation Map of the Western Gawler Ranges, South Australia ________________________________________________________________________________ PREFACE ________________________________________________________________________________ A Vegetation Map of the Western Gawler Ranges, South Australia is a further product of the Biological Survey of South Australia The program of systematic biological surveys to cover the whole of South Australia arose out of a realisation that an effort was needed to increase our knowledge of the distribution of the vascular plants and vertebrate fauna of the state and to encourage their conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Grassy Woodland
    EVALUATION OF RESTORATION: A GRASSY WOODLAND BY PETER WILLIAM BROUGHTON NICHOLS A Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Western Sydney © Peter Nichols 2005 Acknowledgements A work of this scale would not have been possible without the assistance of several people. The author would like to express gratitude to the following people for assistance throughout the completion of this Thesis. Firstly, I would like to thank my supervisors Dr E. Charles Morris (University of Western Sydney) and Dr David Keith (National Parks and Wildlife Service) for their support and guidance throughout all phases of the project. Both have provided timely advice throughout the project and critical comments on the many versions of the draft Thesis. Their assistance has been much appreciated. Particular thanks go to Peter Wood for his assistance with fieldwork, species identification and comments on draft versions of the Thesis. Thanks are also due to several people who assisted with fieldwork and provided general advice and comment including: Jeanette Lawrence, Paul Nichols, Monique de Barse and Jennifer Fitzgerald. In addition, thanks go to several people working for Greening Australia for help with access to sites and fieldwork equipment and historical documents including Dave Warren, Dan Williams and Judy Christie. I would especially like to thank my parents-in-law, Alma and Howard Dudgeon for their child minding efforts and my parents, Denise and Alan and Nichols for their timely encouragement and support, especially through the writing phase of the Thesis. Finally, I would like to thank my wife Coralie Nichols for her patience, good humour and support throughout.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Amendment 4-2020
    PLANNING SCHEME AMENDMENT Job Name V_Messmate Make Address Messmate Road, Torquay NorthREPORT – Western Growth Area Version & Date Version D 24.07.2020 Author (s) Nicola Smith and Naomi Beck Checked By Nicola Smith FOR THE: This report is subject to copyrightCOUNTRY the owner of which CLUB is Niche Planning ESTATE Studio. All unauthorised copying or reproduction of this report or any part of it is forbidden by law and is subject to civil and criminal penalties as set out in the Copyright Act 1968. All requests for permission to reproduce this report or its contents must – PROSPECT VALE, LAUNCESTON be directed to Niche Planning Studio. Country Club Estate | Planning Scheme Amendment Request Page | 1 Job Name T_Country Club ER Address 100 Country Club Avenue, Prospect Vale TAS 7250 Version & Date Version v8 02.02.2021 Author (s) Nicola Smith, Jeremy Gammon, Olivia Cootes Checked By Nicola Smith This report is subject to copyright the owner of which is Niche Planning Studio. All unauthorised copying or reproduction of this report or any part of it is forbidden by law and is subject to civil and criminal penalties as set out in the Copyright Act 1968. All requests for permission to reproduce this report or its contents must be directed to Niche Planning Studio. Country Club Estate | Planning Scheme Amendment Request Page | 2 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................... 6 1. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Biological Survey of the Murray Mallee South Australia
    A BIOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE MURRAY MALLEE SOUTH AUSTRALIA Editors J. N. Foulkes J. S. Gillen Biological Survey and Research Section Heritage and Biodiversity Division Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia 2000 The Biological Survey of the Murray Mallee, South Australia was carried out with the assistance of funds made available by the Commonwealth of Australia under the National Estate Grants Programs and the State Government of South Australia. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the Australian Heritage Commission or the State Government of South Australia. This report may be cited as: Foulkes, J. N. and Gillen, J. S. (Eds.) (2000). A Biological Survey of the Murray Mallee, South Australia (Biological Survey and Research, Department for Environment and Heritage and Geographic Analysis and Research Unit, Department for Transport, Urban Planning and the Arts). Copies of the report may be accessed in the library: Environment Australia Department for Human Services, Housing, GPO Box 636 or Environment and Planning Library CANBERRA ACT 2601 1st Floor, Roma Mitchell House 136 North Terrace, ADELAIDE SA 5000 EDITORS J. N. Foulkes and J. S. Gillen Biological Survey and Research Section, Heritage and Biodiversity Branch, Department for Environment and Heritage, GPO Box 1047 ADELAIDE SA 5001 AUTHORS D. M. Armstrong, J. N. Foulkes, Biological Survey and Research Section, Heritage and Biodiversity Branch, Department for Environment and Heritage, GPO Box 1047 ADELAIDE SA 5001. S. Carruthers, F. Smith, S. Kinnear, Geographic Analysis and Research Unit, Planning SA, Department for Transport, Urban Planning and the Arts, GPO Box 1815, ADELAIDE SA 5001.
    [Show full text]
  • Nanya Station, Western New South Wales Vegetation, Flora and Fauna
    NANYA STATION, WESTERN NEW SOUTH WALES VEGETATION, FLORA AND FAUNA Prepared by Martin E. Westbrooke, Centre for Environmental Management, University of Ballarat Nanya Station, owned and managed by the University of Ballarat was purchased with assistance from the Department of Environment and Heritage. Ongoing management is supported by the Lower Murray Darling Catchment Management Authority FOREWORD 1 FOREWORD This booklet has been prepared as an introduction for visitors to Nanya. Nanya is managed for conservation, research and teaching and affords protection to highly significant environments including two endangered communities and seventeen endangered or vulnerable species. On your visit, please respect these values. NANYA STATION Nanya Station is located in the Scotia country of far western New South Wales and consists of the Nanya Western Lands Pastoral Lease 3281 – Perpetual Leasehold Lot 1244 in Deposited Plan 762778, Parish of Winnebaga, County of Tara. Nanya Homestead complex 2 BACKGROUND The Scotia region has one of the shortest stock grazing histories of western NSW. Along with five other properties, Nanya was created as a pastoral lease in 1927. Previously the area was part of the large Lake Victoria lease and stock grazing occurred only in wet years (Withers 1989). The original lease was taken up by Gordon Cummings in 1927. He first dug a dam near the southeast corner of the property. A larger ground tank and homestead at the site of the present complex was later established. An area around the homestead was cleared and cropped to provide feed for the horses used in digging the earth tanks. The ruins of the original building are located between the shearing shed and Homestead Tank.
    [Show full text]