DOCSLIB.ORG

04 WGEF Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
04 WGEF Report 36 | ICES WGEF REPORT 2017 2 Spurdog in the Northeast Atlantic 2.1 Stock distribution Spurdog Squalus acanthias has a worldwide distribution in temperate and boreal wa- ters, and occurs mainly in depths of 10–200 m. In the NE Atlantic, this species is found from Iceland and the Barents Sea southwards to the coast of Northwest Africa (McEachran and Branstetter, 1984). WGEF considers that there is a single NE Atlantic stock ranging from the Barents Sea (Subarea 1) to the Bay of Biscay (Subarea 8), and that this is the most appropriate unit for assessment and management within ICES. Spurdog in Subarea 9 may be part of the NE Atlantic stock, but catches from this area are likely to consist of a mixture of Squalus species, with increasing numbers of Squalus blainville further south. Genetic microsatellite analyses conducted by Verissimo et al. (2010) found no differ- ences between East and Wwest Atlantic spurdog. The authors suggested this could be accomplished by transatlantic migrations of a very limited number of individuals. Fur- ther information on the stock structure and migratory pattern of Northeast Atlantic spurdog can be found in the Stock Annex. 2.2 The fishery 2.2.1 History of the fishery Spurdog has a long history of exploitation in the Northeast Atlantic (Pawson et al., 2009) and WGEF estimates of total landings are shown in Figure 2.1a and Table 2.1. Spurdog has historically been exploited by France, Ireland, Norway and the UK (Fig- ure 2.1b and Table 2.2). The main fishing grounds for the NE Atlantic stock of spurdog are the North Sea (Subarea 4), West of Scotland (Division 6.a) and the Celtic Seas (Sub- area 7) and, during the decade spanning the late 1980s to 1990s, the Norwegian Sea (Subarea 2) (Table 2.3). Outside these areas, landings have generally been low. In recent years the fishery has changed significantly in line with restrictive management measures, which have included more restrictive quota, a maximum landing length and bycatch regulations. Further details of the historical development of the fishery are provided in the Stock Annex. Further general information on the mixed fisheries exploiting this stock, and changes in effort can be found in ICES (2009 a, b) and STECF (2009). 2.2.2 The fishery in 2016 The zero TAC for spurdog for EU vessels has resulted in a major change in the magni- tude and spatial distribution of reported landings. Landings have declined across all ICES subareas in recent years, although there are some landings in the northern parts of the ICES area. Since 2011 the annual Norwegian landings have been stable at 216–313 tonnes. Prelim- inary reported landings of spurdog from Norwegian fisheries were 270 t in 2016. In July 2016, an in-year amendment to EU quota regulations saw the introduction of a small TAC (270 t) for Union and international waters of Subareas 1, 5–8, 10 and 12 (see Section 2.2.4). In 2016, UK and Ireland reported landings of 30 and 34 tonnes spurdog respectively. For UK, traditionally one of the major exploiters of the spurdog stock, this was a major increase from a level close to zero that has been seen since the zero TAC ICES WGEF REPORT 2017 | 37 was introduced in 2011. Apart from Denmark, that reported 24 tonnes spurdog for 2016, no other countries reported any significant catch. Commercial fishermen in various areas, including the southern North Sea, the Celtic Sea, and in the South- and Mid-Norwegian coastal areas, continue to report that spur- dog can be seasonally abundant on their fishing grounds. 2.2.3 ICES advice applicable In 2016, ICES advised that “when the precautionary approach is applied, there should be no targeted fisheries on this stock in 2017 and 2018. Based on medium-term projections, annual catches at the recent assumed level (2468 tonnes) would allow the stock to increase at a rate close to that estimated with zero catches. Any possible provision for the landing of bycatch should be part of a management plan, including close monitoring of the stock and fisheries”. 2.2.4 Management applicable The following table summarizes ICES advice and actual management applicable for NE Atlantic spurdog during 2001–2016: 38 | ICES WGEF REPORT 2017 YEAR SINGLE- BASIS TAC TAC IIIA , I, TAC TAC I, V, VI, WG STOCK (IIA(EC) V, VI, VII, IIIA(EC) VII, VIII, XII LANDINGS EXPLOITATION AND IV) VIII, XII AND (TONNES) AND XIV (EU (NE BOUNDARY (TONNES) XIV (EU AND AND ATLANTIC (TONNES) INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL STOCK) WATERS) WATERS) (TONNES) (TONNES) (TONNES) 2000 No advice - 9470 15 890 2001 No advice - 8870 - - - 16 693(1) 2002 No advice - 7100 - - - 11 020 2003 No advice - 5640 - - - 12 246 2004 No advice - 4472 - - - 9365 2005 No advice - 1136 - - - 7100 2006 F=0 Stock depleted 1051 - - - 4015 and in danger of collapse 2007 F=0 Stock depleted 841 (2) 2 828 - - 2917 and in danger of collapse 2008 No new No new advice 631 (2,3) - - 2004 (2) 1798 advice 2009 F=0 Stock depleted 316 (3,4) - 104 (4) 1002 (4) 1980 and in danger of collapse 2010 F=0 Stock depleted 0 (5) 0 (5) 0 (5) 892 and in danger of collapse 2011 F=0 Stock depleted 0 (6) 0 0 (6) 435 and in danger of collapse 2012 F=0 Stock below 0 (6) 0 0 (6) 453 possible reference points 2013 F=0 Stock below 0 0 0 335 possible reference points 2014 F=0 Stock below 0 0 0 383 possible reference points 2015 F=0 Stock below 0 0 0 237 possible reference points 2016 F=0 Stock below 0 0 0 (270) 349 possible reference points (1) The WG estimate of landings in 2001 may include some misreported deep-sea sharks or other species. (2) Bycatch quota. These species shall not comprise more than 5% by live weight of the catch retained on board. (3) For Norway: including catches taken with longlines of tope shark (Galeorhinus galeus), kitefin shark (Dalatias licha), bird beak dogfish (Deania calcea), leafscale gulper shark (Centrophorus squamosus), greater lantern shark (Etmopterus princeps), smooth lantern shark (Etmopterus spinax) and Portuguese dogfish (Centroscymnus coelolepis). This quota may only be taken in zones IV, VI and VII. ICES WGEF REPORT 2017 | 39 (4) A maximum landing size of 100 cm (total length) shall be respected. (5)Bycatches are permitted up to 10% of the 2009 quotas established in Annex Ia to Regulation (EC) No. 43/2009 under the following conditions: catches taken with longlines of tope shark (Galeorhinus galeus), kitefin shark (Dalatias licha), bird beak dogfish (Deania calceus), leafscale gulper shark (Centrophorus squamosus), greater lantern shark (Etmopterus princeps), smooth lantern shark (Etmopterus pusillus) and Portuguese dogfish (Centroscymnus coelolepis) and spurdog (Squalus acanthias) are included (Does not apply to IIIa); a maximum landing size of 100 cm (total length) is respected;the bycatches comprise less than 10% of the total weight of marine organisms on board the fishing vesselCatches not complying with these conditions or exceeding these quantities shall be promptly released to the extent practicable. (6) Catches taken with longlines of tope shark (Galeorhinus galeus), kitefin shark (Dalatias licha), bird beak dogfish (Deania calcea), leafscale gulper shark (Centrophorus squamosus), greater lanternshark (Etmopterus princeps), smooth lanternshark (Etmopterus pusillus), Portuguese dogfish (Centroscymnus coelolepis) and spurdog (Squalus acanthias) are included. Catches of these species shall be promptly re- leased unharmed to the extent practicable. In all EU regulated areas, a zero TAC for spurdog was retained for 2016. In July 2016, an in-year amendment to EU quota regulations (Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1252 of 28 July 2016) saw the introduction of a small TAC (270 t) for Union and international waters of Subareas 1, 5–8, 10 and 12, with this TAC to be allocated to vessels partici- pating in bycatch avoidance programmes. This regulation states that “a vessel engaged in the bycatch avoidance programme that has been positively assessed by the STECF may land not more than 2 tonnes per month of picked dogfish that is dead at the moment when the fishing gear is hauled on board. Member States participating in the bycatch avoidance programme shall ensure that the total annual landings of picked dogfish on the basis of this derogation do not exceed the amounts indicated below. They shall communicate the list of participating vessels to the Commission before allowing any landings. Member States shall exchange information about avoidance areas”. This derogation was not denoted for TAC areas for EU waters of 3.a or EU waters of 2.a and 4. In these areas, no EU landings were permitted. In 2007, Norway introduced a general ban on target fisheries for spurdog in the Nor- wegian economic zone and in international waters of ICES Subareas 1–14, with the ex- ception of a limited fishery for small coastal vessels. Bycatch could be landed and sold as before. All directed fisheries were banned from 2011, although there is still a bycatch allowance. From October 2011, bycatch should not exceed 20% of total landings on a weekly basis. Since 4 June 2012, bycatch must not exceed 20% of total landings over the period 4 June–31 December 2012. From 1 January 2013, bycatch must not exceed 15% of total landings on a half calendar year basis. Live specimens can be released, whereas dead specimens must be landed. From 2011, the regulations also include recreational fisheries. Norway has a 70 cm minimum landing size (first introduced in 1964). Since 1st January 2008, fishing for spurdog with nets and longlines in Swedish waters has been forbidden.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sharks in Crisis: a Call to Action for the Mediterranean
    REPORT 2019 SHARKS IN CRISIS: A CALL TO ACTION FOR THE MEDITERRANEAN WWF Sharks in the Mediterranean 2019 | 1 fp SECTION 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Written and edited by WWF Mediterranean Marine Initiative / Evan Jeffries (www.swim2birds.co.uk), based on data contained in: Bartolí, A., Polti, S., Niedermüller, S.K. & García, R. 2018. Sharks in the Mediterranean: A review of the literature on the current state of scientific knowledge, conservation measures and management policies and instruments. Design by Catherine Perry (www.swim2birds.co.uk) Front cover photo: Blue shark (Prionace glauca) © Joost van Uffelen / WWF References and sources are available online at www.wwfmmi.org Published in July 2019 by WWF – World Wide Fund For Nature Any reproduction in full or in part must mention the title and credit the WWF Mediterranean Marine Initiative as the copyright owner. © Text 2019 WWF. All rights reserved. Our thanks go to the following people for their invaluable comments and contributions to this report: Fabrizio Serena, Monica Barone, Adi Barash (M.E.C.O.), Ioannis Giovos (iSea), Pamela Mason (SharkLab Malta), Ali Hood (Sharktrust), Matthieu Lapinksi (AILERONS association), Sandrine Polti, Alex Bartoli, Raul Garcia, Alessandro Buzzi, Giulia Prato, Jose Luis Garcia Varas, Ayse Oruc, Danijel Kanski, Antigoni Foutsi, Théa Jacob, Sofiane Mahjoub, Sarah Fagnani, Heike Zidowitz, Philipp Kanstinger, Andy Cornish and Marco Costantini. Special acknowledgements go to WWF-Spain for funding this report. KEY CONTACTS Giuseppe Di Carlo Director WWF Mediterranean Marine Initiative Email: [email protected] Simone Niedermueller Mediterranean Shark expert Email: [email protected] Stefania Campogianni Communications manager WWF Mediterranean Marine Initiative Email: [email protected] WWF is one of the world’s largest and most respected independent conservation organizations, with more than 5 million supporters and a global network active in over 100 countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification Guide to the Deep-Sea Cartilaginous Fishes Of
    Identification guide to the deep–sea cartilaginous fishes of the Southeastern Atlantic Ocean FAO. 2015. Identification guide to the deep–sea cartilaginous fishes of the Southeastern Atlantic Ocean. FishFinder Programme, by Ebert, D.A. and Mostarda, E., Rome, Italy. Supervision: Merete Tandstad, Jessica Sanders (FAO, Rome) Technical editor: Edoardo Mostarda (FAO, Rome) Colour illustrations, cover and graphic design: Emanuela D’Antoni (FAO, Rome) This guide was prepared under the “FAO Deep–sea Fisheries Programme” thanks to a generous funding from the Government of Norway (Support to the implementation of the International Guidelines on the Management of Deep-Sea Fisheries in the High Seas project) for the purpose of assisting states, institutions, the fishing industry and RFMO/As in the implementation of FAO International Guidelines for the Management of Deep-sea Fisheries in the High Seas. It was developed in close collaboration with the FishFinder Programme of the Marine and Inland Fisheries Branch, Fisheries Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). The present guide covers the deep–sea Southeastern Atlantic Ocean and that portion of Southwestern Indian Ocean from 18°42’E to 30°00’E (FAO Fishing Area 47). It includes a selection of cartilaginous fish species of major, moderate and minor importance to fisheries as well as those of doubtful or potential use to fisheries. It also covers those little known species that may be of research, educational, and ecological importance. In this region, the deep–sea chondrichthyan fauna is currently represented by 50 shark, 20 batoid and 8 chimaera species. This guide includes full species accounts for 37 shark, 9 batoid and 4 chimaera species selected as being the more difficult to identify and/or commonly caught.
    [Show full text]
  • Coelho Phd Lantern S
    UNIVERSIDADEdo ALGARVE FaculdadedeCiênciasdoMaredo Ambiente Biology,populationdynamics,managementandconservation ofdeepwaterlanternsharks,Etmopterusspinax and Etmopteruspusillus (Chondrichthyes:Etmopteridae)insouthernPortugal(northeastAtlantic). (DoutoramentoemCiênciaseTecnologiasdasPescas,especialidadedeBiologiaPesqueira) (ThesisforthedegreeinDoctorofPhilosophyinFisheriesSciencesandTechnologies,specialtyinFisheriesBiology) RUIPEDROANDRADECOELHO Faro (2007) UNIVERSIDADE DO ALGARVE FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS DO MAR E DO AMBIENTE Biology, population dynamics, management and conservation of deep water lantern sharks, Etmopterus spinax and Etmopterus pusillus (Chondrichthyes: Etmopteridae) in southern Portugal (northeast Atlantic). (Doutoramento em Ciências e Tecnologias das Pescas, especialidade de Biologia Pesqueira) (Thesis for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy in Fisheries Sciences and Technologies, specialty in Fisheries Biology) RUI PEDRO ANDRADE COELHO Orientador / Supervisor: Prof. Doutor Karim Erzini Júri / Jury: - Prof. Doutor José Pedro Andrade, Professor Catedrático da Faculdade de Ciências do Mar e do Ambiente, Universidade do Algarve; - Prof. Doutor Karim Erzini, Professor Associado com Agregação da Faculdade de Ciências do Mar e do Ambiente, Universidade do Algarve; - Prof. Doutor Leonel Paulo Sul de Serrano Gordo, Professor Auxiliar com Agregação da Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa; - Prof. Doutor Manuel Seixas Afonso Dias, Professor Auxiliar da Faculdade de Ciências do Mar e do Ambiente, Universidade do Algarve;
    [Show full text]
  • Greeneye Spurdog, Squalus Chloroculus
    Published Date: 1 March 2019 Greeneye Spurdog, Squalus chloroculus Report Card Recovering assessment IUCN Red List IUCN Red List Australian Endemic to Australia Global Near Threatened Assessment Assessment Assessors Walker, T.I. Management measures are expected to rehabilitate depleted Report Card Remarks populations Summary The Greeneye Spurdog is a large, deepwater endemic dogfish from southeast Australia. The species has low biological productivity due to its high longevity and low reproductive output. Fishing was intense in some Source: CSIRO National Fish Collection. License: CC BY Attribution areas where it has caused severe population reductions. Fishing intensity has since reduced, and management measures such as a low combined Total Allowable Catch of all deepwater dogfish in southeast Australia and a network of refuges have stabilised the population. The management actions are expected to rehabilitate the population. Therefore, the Greeneye Spurdog is assessed as Near Threatened (IUCN) and Transitional Recovering (SAFS). Distribution The Greeneye Spurdog occurs off southern Australia from New South Wales (NSW) to the Great Australian Bight (Last and Stevens 2009). Stock structure and status The Greeneye Spurdog is a recently described species (Last et al. 2007). The relative abundance of populations has varied widely across its distribution range with localised depletion in some localities and comparatively high abundance in others (Walker and Gason 2007). Declines in the population indicated by both fishery-dependent monitoring and fishery-independent scientific surveys show that Greeneye Spurdog is vulnerable to rapid population decline where it is heavily fished. Fisheries The primary threat to the Greeneye Spurdog is fishing. Fishing is intensive on trawl grounds around southeast Australia, where there is evidence that this species has been severely depleted in some localities, but less so in others.
    [Show full text]
  • And Their Functional, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications
    DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Science and Health Theses and Dissertations College of Science and Health Spring 6-14-2019 Body Forms in Sharks (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii), and Their Functional, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications Phillip C. Sternes DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/csh_etd Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Sternes, Phillip C., "Body Forms in Sharks (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii), and Their Functional, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications" (2019). College of Science and Health Theses and Dissertations. 327. https://via.library.depaul.edu/csh_etd/327 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Science and Health at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Science and Health Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Body Forms in Sharks (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii), and Their Functional, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science June 2019 By Phillip C. Sternes Department of Biological Sciences College of Science and Health DePaul University Chicago, Illinois Table of Contents Table of Contents.............................................................................................................................ii List of Tables..................................................................................................................................iv
    [Show full text]
  • © Iccat, 2007
    A2.2 ICCAT Species Codes APPENDIX 2.2: SPECIES CODES Y ello wfin tuna Codes used to identify the ICCAT tuna and tuna-like species as well as by-catch species Atún blanco Tuna and tuna-like species G e r m o n Numerical Alphabetical Scientific Name English SkipjackFra tunancais EspañolR a b i l 1 BFT Thunnus thynnus Northern bluefin tuna Thon rouge du Nord Atún común (Cimarrón) 2 SBF Thunnus maccoyii Southern bluefin tuna Thon rouge du Sud Atún del Sur 3 YFT Thunnus albacares erocablA T hazard-bâtard L i s t a d o 4 ALB Thunnus alalunga erocablA Plain bonito 5 BET Thunnus obesus Bigeye tuna Thon obèse(=Patudo)P a l o m e t tPatudo e 6 BLF Thunnus atlanticus Blackfin tuna Thon à nageoires noires Atún des aletas negras 7 LTA Euthynnus alletteratus Little tunny(=Atl.black skipjack) Thonine commune BacoretaT a s a r t e 8 SKJ Katsuwonus pelamis WBlack a h o o m arlinoatsiL M akaire noir 9 BON Sarda sarda Atlantic bonito Bonite à dos rayé Bonito del AtlánticoA guja negra P e t o 10 FRI Auxis thazard Frigate tuna Auxide Melva 11 BOP Orcynopsis unicolor 12 WAH Acanthocybium solandri Pez espada 13 SSM Scomberomorus maculatus Atlantic SpanishS w mackerel o r d f i s hTh azard atlantique Carite atlántico 14 KGM Scomberomorus cavalla King mackerel Thazard Ebarr sé p a d o n Carite lucio 15 SAI Istiophorus albicans Atlantic sailfish Voilier de l'Atlantique Pez vela del Atlántico 16 BLM Makaira indica 17 BUM Makaira nigricans Atlantic blue marlin Makaire bleu de l'Atlantique Aguja azul del Atlántico 18 WHM Tetrapturus albidus Atlantic white marlin Makaire blanc de l'Atlantique Aguja blanca del Atlántico 28 19 SWO Xiphias gladius 3 20 SPF Tetrapturus pfluegeri Longbill spearfish Makaire bécune Aguja picuda 284 ICCAT MANUAL, 1st Edition (January 2010) 21 TUN Thunnini sanuT ien sédinohT acn senutA pen 23 YOU gnuoY sanut senueJ sédinoht senutA senevój 24 BIL Istiophoridae Marlins,sailfishes,etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Migratory Sharks Complete 3 0 0.Pdf
    CMS Technical Series No. 15 Review of Migratory Chondrichthyan Fishes Review of Migratory Chondrichthyan Fishes Prepared by the Shark Specialist Group of the IUCN Species Survival Commission on behalf of the CMS Secretariat • CMS Technical Series No. 15 CMS Technical UNEP/CMS Secretariat Public Information Hermann-Ehlers-Str. 10 53113 Bonn, Germany T. +49 228 815-2401/02 F. +49 228 815-2449 www.cms.int Review of Chondrichthyan Fishes IUCN Species Survival Commission’s Shark Specialist Group December 2007 Published by IUCN–The World Conservation Union, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the Secretariat of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS). Review of Chondrichthyan Fishes. 2007. Prepared by the Shark Specialist Group of the IUCN Species Survival Commission on behalf of the CMS Secretariat. Cover photographs © J. Stafford-Deitsch. Front cover: Isurus oxyrinchus Shortfin mako shark. Back cover, from left: Sphyrna mokarran Great hammerhead shark, Carcharodon carcharias Great white shark, Prionace glauca Blue shark. Maps from Collins Field Guide to Sharks of the World. 2005. IUCN and UNEP/ CMS Secretariat, Bonn, Germany. 72 pages. Technical Report Series 15. This publication was prepared and printed with funding from the CMS Secretariat and Department for the Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs, UK. Produced by: Naturebureau, Newbury, UK. Printed by: Information Press, Oxford, UK. Printed on: 115gsm Allegro Demi-matt produced from sustainable sources. © 2007 IUCN–The World Conservation Union / Convention on Migratory Species (CMS). This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made.
    [Show full text]
  • Into the Deep: Implementing CITES Measures for Commercially-Valuable Sharks and Manta Rays (PDF, 1.8
    A TRAFFIC REPORT CCSBT-ERS/1308/Info10 INTO THE DEEP: IMPLEMENTING CITES MEASURES FOR COMMERCIALLY-VALUABLE SHARKS AND MANTA RAYS VICTORIA MUNDY-TAYLOR AND VICKI CROOK A TRAFFIC REPORT CCSBT-ERS/1308/Info10 Published by TRAFFIC. Report prepared by TRAFFIC for the European Commission under Contract 070307/2010/574210/SER/E2 © European Commission. All rights reserved. All material appearing in this publication is copyrighted and may be reproduced with permission. Any reproduction in full or in part of this publication must credit the European Commission as the copyright owner. The views of the authors expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the European Commission, TRAFFIC, WWF or IUCN. The designation of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the European Commission, TRAFFIC or its supporting organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The TRAFFIC symbol copyright and Registered Trademark ownership is held by WWF. TRAFFIC is a strategic alliance of WWF and IUCN. Suggested citation: Mundy-Taylor V. and Crook V. (2013). Into the deep: Implementing CITES measures for commercially-valuable sharks and manta rays. Report prepared for the European Commission. ISBN 978-1-85850-357-8 Front cover photograph: Giant Mantas Manta birostris, Raja Ampat, West Papua, Indonesia © Andrea Marshall CCSBT-ERS/1308/Info10 INTO THE DEEP: IMPLEMENTING CITES MEASURES FOR COMMERCIALLY-VALUABLE SHARKS AND MANTA RAYS VICTORIA MUNDY-TAYLOR AND VICKI CROOK y Cat Hollowa © Scalloped hammerhead shark (Sphyrna lewini), Fiji.
    [Show full text]
  • Somniosus Microcephalus)
    Organohalogen contaminants in Greenland shark (Somniosus microcephalus) Anna Strid Department of Materials and Environmental Chemistry Stockholm University Stockholm 2010 Doctoral thesis 2010 Department of Materials and Environmental Chemistry Stockholm University SE-106 91 Stockholm Sweden Abstract The remote sub-Arctic/Arctic environment has due to human activities become a sink for organohalogen contaminants (OHCs). These OHC include traditional contaminants such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), DDTs and technical mixtures of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), all included in the Stockholm Convention list of persistent organic pollutants (POPs). Other OHCs, currently under evaluation to be included among the POPs i.e. short chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs) and hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD) are also found in these environments as well as a whole range of other OHCs. The main objective of this thesis is to increase the knowledge about the presence of OHCs in a high trophic Arctic shark species, the Greenland shark (Somniosus microcephalus ). The Greenland shark is an opportunistic feeder, occasionally feeding at the top of the Arctic marine food chain. Furthermore may this species have a life span in excess of 100 years and is probably among the oldest of any fish species. These traits make the shark prone to accumulate elevated concentrations of OHCs. This has shown to be true for the Greenland sharks studied and most of the targeted OHCs were determined in the species. The highest concentrations were observed for the DDTs, ranging up to 26 µg/g fat. Other OHCs reported that are of special interest are SCCPs and brominated flame retardants used as replacement products to PBDEs; pentabromoethylbenzene (PBEB) and 1,2- bis(2,4,6-tribromophenoxy)ethane (BTBPE).
    [Show full text]
  • Squalus Acanthias, Spiny Dogfish
    The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ ISSN 2307-8235 (online) IUCN 2008: T91209505A2898271 Squalus acanthias, Spiny Dogfish Assessment by: Fordham, S., Fowler, S.L., Coelho, R.P., Goldman, K. & Francis, M.P. View on www.iucnredlist.org Citation: Fordham, S., Fowler, S.L., Coelho, R.P., Goldman, K. & Francis, M.P. 2016. Squalus acanthias. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T91209505A2898271. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T91209505A2898271.en Copyright: © 2016 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale, reposting or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holder. For further details see Terms of Use. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is produced and managed by the IUCN Global Species Programme, the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) and The IUCN Red List Partnership. The IUCN Red List Partners are: BirdLife International; Botanic Gardens Conservation International; Conservation International; Microsoft; NatureServe; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Sapienza University of Rome; Texas A&M University; Wildscreen; and Zoological Society of London. If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown in this document, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct
    [Show full text]
  • Identification Guide to Common Sharks and Rays of the Caribbean
    Identification Guide to Common Sharks and Rays of the Caribbean The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. © FAO, 2016 ISBN 978-92-5-109245-3 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licence-request or addressed to [email protected]. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/publications) and can be purchased through [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    SHARKS IN THE BALTIC Distribution, use and conservation of cartilaginous fishes in the Baltic Sea EXECUTIVE SUMMARY S HARK ALLI A NCE Executive summary The Baltic Sea’s low salinity, extreme hydrological circumstances and physical barriers limit but do not preclude the distribution of sharks, rays and chimaeras (cartilaginous fishes). More than 30 such species have been found in these waters, some commonly. These exceptionally vulnerable fish are poorly studied and virtually unprotected in the face of ongoing fishing pressure and habitat degradation. This inattention hampers the understanding and conservation of these species. Water exchange from the North Sea into the Baltic is species of chimaera (rat or rabbit fish) (Chimaera greatly slowed by a narrow mixing zone. High density monstrosa) are found in this area. seawater flows in toward the bottom while lower density, low-salinity water leaves near the surface. The distinctiveGreenland shark (Somniosus This brackish sea declines in salinity from west to east microcephalus), common thresher (Alopias vulpinus) and south to north. Vertical circulation is restricted by and angular roughshark (Oxynotus centrina) layering caused by density differences between sea and occasionally enter the region, as do the spotted ray fresh water. Topographic barriers impede both water (Raja montagui), nursehound (Scyliorhinus stellaris) influx and species distribution. Baltic currents are highly and two species of electric rays (Torpedo marmorata variable. Strong influx events occur once a decade, half and Torpedo nobiliana). There are single records of the as frequently as in the past. These conditions limit the wide-ranging oceanic whitetip shark (Carcharhinus distribution of marine Baltic flora and fauna.
    [Show full text]