Abstract the Purpose of My Thesis Is to Explore Lesbianism in Adrienne
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Abstract The purpose of my thesis is to explore lesbianism in Adrienne Rich’s essays and poetry. Rich has earned her reputation as a major American poet and essayist since the 1950s. Most attention has been paid to her extraordinary poems and revolutionary prose. However, the issue of lesbianism has seldom been focused on or fully discussed. Therefore, I would try to present a panoramic view on how lesbianism has been developed in Rich’s works. In the first chapter, I have tried to delineate various definitions of “lesbian”, and formulate my own definition. Besides that, I have also introduced some theoretical perspectives of lesbianism. In the second chapter, the discussion is mainly on Rich’s concepts— “institutionalization of heterosexuality”, “lesbian existence” and “lesbian continuum”— which were brought up in the essay “Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence.” In the third chapter, my aim is to delineate the development of Rich’s lesbian perspective in her poetry. The discussion consists of three parts: the first part covers the revelation of women’s oppression; the second is stressed on the concept of androgyny; the last part will present Rich’s idea that women’s power should be based on close relations among women. 論文名稱:安筑恩‧瑞奇詩與散文中的女同志主義 校所組別:國立中山大學外國語文研究所 研究生: 蔡婉俐 指導教授: 鍾玲 教授 論文摘要: 本論文旨在探討安筑恩‧瑞奇的詩與散文中所展現的女同志主 義。自 50 年代起,瑞奇即以美國主要的詩人與散文作家享有盛譽。 最受到注意的莫過於她精采絕倫的詩作與富有革新精神的散文。然 而,當中卻鮮少有人針對女同志主義提出全面性的討論。因此,筆者 試圖在本論文中呈現瑞奇作品中的女同志主義。第一章,筆者首先引 證多家對“女同志”之定義,再為“女同志”做出定義。此外,本章 將簡介各個不同理論觀點對女同志主義所做過的研究與討論。第二 章,討論著重於瑞奇在“強迫性異性戀與女同志存在”一文中所提出 的主要觀念:「異性戀的制度化」,「女同志存在」,和「女同志連續體」。 第三章,筆者將呈現女同志主義觀點在瑞奇詩中的發展。討論將分成 三部份:一是關於女性受壓迫事實的揭露;二是強調「雌雄同體」觀 念的討論;最後是展現瑞奇的概念— 女性力量應奠基於女性親密關 係。 Table of Contents Introduction . 1 Chapter I Definition of “Lesbian” and Theoretical Perspectives on Lesbianism . .10 Chapter II Lesbianism in Adrienne Rich’s Political Essays . 40 Chapter III Lesbianism in Adrienne Rich’s Poetry . .. .62 Conclusion . 101 Works Cited . .106 Tsai 1 Introduction The poetry and feminist essays of Adrienne Rich (b.1929) have won her literary fame. I perceive that lesbianism is an important issue presented both in her poetry and essays. Most critics put more emphasis on feminism than on lesbianism in Rich’s works1. For instance, Albert Gelpi in her essay “Adrienne Rich: The Poetics of Change” has paid more attention on Rich’s development of feminism (ARPP 282-99); the feminist critic Judith McDaniel explores Rich’s changing visions with a feminist point of view in “Reconstituting the World” (Reading Adrienne Rich 3-29). Only several critics like Judy Grahn in The Highest Apple: Sappho and The Lesbian Poetic Tradition discuss Rich’s essays or poetry with a viewpoint of lesbianism. If we want to fully understand Rich’s lesbianism, it is necessary to read the poetry and essays that are composed before she raises her theory in “Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence” which was published in 1980. My thesis consists of three chapters that I will give 1 Feminist studies on Rich’s works include: Jane Roberta Cooper, ed., Reading Adrienne Rich: Reviews and Re-Visions, 1951-81 (Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1984); Claire Keyes, The Aesthetics of Power: The Poetry of Adrienne Rich (Athens: U of Georgia P, 1986); Jean Perreault, Writing Selves: Contemporary Feminist Autography (Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1995); Alice Templeton, The Dream and the Dialogue: Adrienne Rich’s Feminist Poetics (Knoxville: U of Tennessee P, 1994), and others. Tsai 2 brief summaries in the introduction. Before that, I will introduce some significant facts in the development of Rich’s lesbian perspective. According to Claire Keyes, it will be disappointing for those readers who look for “the feminist visionary of her later poems” in the early poems of Adrienne Rich, since those visions were still tiny “seeds” shaded by the dominant form of “mainstream patriarchal values” (15-16). Those patriarchal values can be perceived in W. H. Auden’s praise of Rich’s “modesty” for her first volume A Change of World (1951). Rich’s poems are considered “modest” mainly because of the revelation of “their family tree” which specifically speaking, is the poetic tradition established by celebrated men poets. Her early poems have been extolled for their skillful imitation of the “neat” and “modest” forms of some male poets like Robert Frost and W. B. Yeats. In addition, the emotions motivating the poems are also considered praiseworthy because, in Auden’s words, they “are not peculiar to Miss Rich but are among the typical experiences of our time” (ARPP278-9). Keyes suggests that Auden includes Rich in a circle of men poets without regards to her being a woman (16). In other words, there is no ostensible attempt to voice out the particular sound of a woman poet in Rich’s early poems. Tsai 3 Even though Rich does not exhibit aggressive feminist perspectives at the beginning, we can still find in these early poems that women artists encounter struggles that rise from the conflicts between their inner desires and the outward restraint from the artistic society that is hosted by a majority of male writers. In the fifties and early sixties described by Rich herself as “years of rapid revelations”, probably stimulated by the atmosphere of uncertainty, Rich began to think about “pacifism and dissent and violence, about poetry and society” and her relationship to all these things. In the late fifties when her third child was born and she was barely able to write, Rich was frightened by a “sense of drift” or so called “destiny” in which she felt losing contact with the girl “who had experienced her own will and energy almost ecstatically at times” (ARPP 173). At that time, her poems were “jotted in fragments during children’s naps, brief hours in a library, or at 3:00 A.M. after rising with a wakeful child” (175). Under such despairing conditions was produced the volume Snapshots of a Daughter-in Law (1963) which can be regarded as her first feminist work. Composing the poem “Snapshots of a Daughter-in-Law”, as Rich admits, is a great relief to her because she no longer follows the Tsai 4 conventional poetics of universalism but returns to use the pronoun “I” as well as to identify herself as a female poet (ARPP 175). Since then Rich begins to undergo an exploration of her identity as a woman and as a non-traditional female poet. The process culminates in the volume Diving into the Wreck (1973) where the idea of women’s power is gradually shaped. Then comes The Dream of a Common Language (1978) in which the concept of women’s power becomes mature as Rich identifies it as a communal power lying in women’s daily relationship. Simultaneously, Rich advocates to re-establish a women’s civilization and female poetics by unraveling the original bond between women, by envisioning women’s love for women. Rich seldom labels her own poetry as lesbian, but in many ways, her poetic writings reflect her theoretical concepts of “lesbian existence” and “lesbian continuum” (BBP 51) which mean any compulsory way of life should be rejected, the taboo of women’s mutual love should be broken, the history of women-identified experiences should be excavated, and the meaning of lesbianism should be created and expanded to involve any form of women’s intimacies. In the first chapter “Definition of ‘lesbian’ and Theoretical Tsai 5 Perspectives on Lesbianism”, the aim is to establish my definition of “lesbian” and to offer a broad view on lesbian studies that have been taken with varieties of theoretical perspectives. At first, I look up the word “lesbian” or “lesbianism” in the dictionaries but find that in most entries, “lesbian” or “lesbianism” is defined exclusively in relation to women’s sexuality. Then I read Ann Ferguson’s discussion on defining “lesbian” which offers some explicit directions to set up my definition of “lesbian”. In her essay “Patriarchy, Sexual Identity, and the Sexual Revolution” published in 1981, Ann Ferguson discusses some acknowledged definitions like that given by Blanche Weisen Cook2 in 1977, and points out two problems that are commonly detected in most definitions of “lesbian.” I think Ferguson’s ideas about giving a specific definition are practical and useful. So according to her suggestions, I try to develop my definition that will be applied to the word “lesbian” in the following discussion. Before discussing lesbianism in Rich’s works, it is necessary to have some background knowledge about lesbianism by looking at how lesbianism has been studied in different theoretical dimensions, such as 2 The definition of Blanche W. Cook is quoted in Chapter I. Tsai 6 biology, psychoanalysis, sociology, feminism and literature. Since my discussion will concentrate on Rich’s writings before and around the 1980s, I intend to take a brief look at other theories that can present a historical view on the development of lesbianism from the beginning of the 20th century to the 1980s and that might bear impact on the development of Rich’s ideology. This intention explains why some theories like the queer theory or the butch-femme aesthetic are not covered in the following discussions even though they are closely associated with lesbianism and prosper in the 1990s. In the biological and psychoanalysis fields, biological determinism of Havelock Ellis and the phallo-centric concept of Sigmund Freud on lesbianism will be discussed and the two points of view will be compared; Tamsin Wilton’s discussion will present a full view of lesbianism in sociology; I will also take a close look at the complicated development of lesbianism in feminism, and viewpoints of feminists like Ann Koedt and of Radicalesbians will be discussed; as to lesbian literature, I will include Bonnie Zimmerman’s propositions about identifying lesbian writings and her discussion on lesbian writing styles, and Judy Grahn’s observation on the history of lesbian poetics.