DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 2 Afocal Systems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 2 Afocal Systems CHAPTER 2 AFOCAL SYSTEMS William B . Wetherell Optical Research Associates Framingham , Massachusetts 2. 1 GLOSSARY BFL back focal length D pupil diameter ER c p eye relief common pupil position ER k eye relief keplerian e exit pupil ; eye space F , F 9 focal points FFL front focal length h , h 9 object and image heights l , l 9 object and image distances M angular magnification m linear , lateral magnification n refractive index OR object relief o entrance pupil ; object space P , P 9 principal points R radius TTL total length tan a slope x , y , z cartesian coordinates D z axial separation 2. 2 INTRODUCTION If collimated (parallel) light rays from an infinitely distant point source fall incident on the input end of a lens system , rays exiting from the output end will show one of three characteristics : (1) they will converge to a real point focus outside the lens system , (2) they will appear to diverge from a virtual point focus within the lens system , or (3) they will 2 .1 2 .2 OPTICAL ELEMENTS emerge as collimated rays that may dif fer in some characteristics from the incident collimated rays . In cases 1 and 2 , the paraxial imaging properties of the lens system can be modeled accurately by a characteristic focal length and a set of fixed principal surfaces . Such lens systems might be called focusing or focal lenses , but are usually referred to simply as lenses . In case 3 , a single finite focal length cannot model the paraxial characteristics of the lens system ; in ef fect , the focal length is infinite , with the output focal point an infinite distance behind the lens , and the associated principal surface an infinite distance in front of the lens . Such lens systems are referred to as afocal , or without focal length . They will be called afocal lenses here , following the common practice of using ‘‘lens’’ to refer to both single element and multielement lens systems . They are the topic of this chapter . The first afocal lens was the galilean telescope (to be described later) , a visual telescope made famous by Galileo’s astronomical observations . It is now believed to have been invented by Hans Lipperhey in 1608 . 1 Afocal lenses are usually thought of in the context of viewing instruments or attachments to change the ef fective focal length of focusing lenses , whose outputs are always collimated . In fact , afocal lenses can form real images of real objects . A more useful distinction between focusing and afocal lenses concerns which optical parameters are fixed , and which can vary in use . Focusing lenses have a fixed , finite focal length , can produce real images for a wide range of object distances , and have a linear magnification which varies with object distance . Afocal lenses have a fixed magnification which is independent of object distance , and the range of object distances yielding real images is severely restricted . This chapter is divided into six sections , including this introduction . The second section reviews the Gaussian (paraxial) image forming characteristics of afocal lenses and compares them to the properties of focusing lenses . The importance of the optical invariant in designing afocal lenses is discussed . The third section reviews the keplerian telescope and its descendants , including both infinite conjugate and finite conjugate variants . The fourth section discusses the galilean telescope and its descendants . Thin-lens models are used in the third and fourth sections to define imaging characteristics and design principles for afocal lenses . The fifth section reviews relay trains and periscopes . The final section reviews reflecting and catadioptric afocal lenses . This chapter is based on an earlier article by Wetherell . 2 That article contains derivations of many of the equations appearing here , as well as a more extensive list of patents illustrating dif ferent types of afocal lens systems . 2. 3 GAUSSIAN ANALYSIS OF AFOCAL LENSES Afocal lenses dif fer from focusing lenses in ways that are not always obvious . It is useful to review the basic image-forming characteristics of focusing lenses before defining the characteristics unique to afocal lenses . Focusing Lenses In this chapter , all lens elements are assumed to be immersed in air , so that object space and image space have the same index of refraction . Points in object space and image space are represented by two rectangular coordinate systems ( x , y , z ) and ( x 9 , y 9 , z 9 ) , with the prime indicating image space . The z - and z 9 -axes form a common line in space , the optical axis of the system . It is assumed , unless noted otherwise , that all lens elements are rotationally symmetric with respect to the optical axis . Under these conditions , the imaging geometry of a focusing lens can be defined in terms of two principal points P and P 9 , two focal points F and F 9 , and a single characteristic focal length f , as shown in Fig . 1 . P , P 9 , F , and F 9 all lie on the optical axis . AFOCAL SYSTEMS 2 .3 FIGURE 1 Imaging geometry of focusing lenses . The focal points F and F 9 , will be the origins for the coordinate systems ( x , y , z ) and ( x 9 , y 9 , z 9 ) . If the origins are at P and P 9 , the coordinates will be given as ( x , y , s ) and ( x 9 , y 9 , s 9 ) , where s 5 z 2 f and s 9 5 z 9 1 f . Normal right-hand sign conventions are used for each set of coordinates , and light travels along the z -axis from negative z toward positive z 9 , unless the optical system has internal mirrors . Figure 1 a illustrates the terminology for finite conjugate objects . Object points and image points are assumed to lie in planes normal to the optical axis , for paraxial computations . Object distance is specified by the axial distance to the object surface , z or s , and image distance by z 9 or s 9 . The two most commonly used equations relating image distance to object distance are 1 1 1 2 5 (1) s 9 s f and zz 9 5 2 f 2 (2) For infinitely distant object points , z 9 5 0 and s 9 5 f , and the corresponding image points will lie in the focal plane at F 9 . To determine the actual distance from object plane to image plane , it is necessary to know the distance sp between P and P 9 . The value of sp is a constant specific to each real lens system , and may be either positive [moving object and image further apart than predicted by Eqs . (1) or (2)] or negative (moving them closer together) . For rotationally symmetric systems , of f-axis object and image coordinates can be expressed by the object height h and image height h 9 , where h 2 5 x 2 1 y 2 and h 9 2 5 x 9 2 1 y 9 2 . Object height and image height are related by the linear magnification m , where h 9 s 9 z 9 1 f m 5 5 5 (3) h s z 2 f 2 .4 OPTICAL ELEMENTS Since the product zz 9 is a constant , Eq . (3) implies that magnification varies with object distance . The principal surfaces of a focusing lens intersect the optical axis at the principal points P and P 9 . In paraxial analysis , the principal surfaces are planes normal to the optical axis ; for real lenses , they may be curved . The principal surfaces are conjugate image surfaces for which m 5 1 1 . 0 . This property makes the raytrace construction shown in Fig . 1 a possible , since a ray traveling parallel to the optical axis in either object or image space must intersect the focal point in the conjugate space , and must also intersect both principal surfaces at the same height . In real lenses , the object and image surfaces may be tilted or curved . Planes normal to the optical axis are still used to define object and image positions for of f-axis object points , and to compute magnification . For tilted object surfaces , the properties of the principal surfaces can be used to relate object surface and image surface tilt angles , as shown in Fig . 1 b . Tilted object and image planes intersect the optical axis and the two principal planes . The tilt angles with respect to the optical axis , u and u 9 , are defined by meridional rays lying in the two surfaces . The points at which conjugate tilted planes intercept the optical axis are defined by s a and s a9 , given by Eq . (1) . Both object and image planes must intersect their respective principal surfaces at the same height y , where y 5 s a tan u 5 s 9a tan u 9 . It follows that tan u 9 s 1 5 a 5 (4) tan u s a9 m a The geometry of Fig . 1 b is known as the Scheimpflug condition , and Eq . (4) is the Scheimpflug rule , relating image to object tilt . The magnification m a applies only to the axial image . The height of f axis of an infinitely distant object is defined by the principal ray angle u p measured from F or P , as shown in Fig . 1 c . In this case , the image height is h 9 5 f tan u p (5) A focusing lens which obeys Eq . (5) for all values of u p within a specified range is said to be distortion - free : if the object is a set of equally spaced parallel lines lying in an object plane perpendicular to the optical axis , it will be imaged as a set of equally spaced parallel lines in an image plane perpendicular to the optical axis , with line spacing proportional to m .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 502-13 Magnifiers and Telescopes
    13-1 I and Instrumentation Design Optical OPTI-502 © Copyright 2019 John E. Greivenkamp E. John 2019 © Copyright Section 13 Magnifiers and Telescopes 13-2 I and Instrumentation Design Optical OPTI-502 Visual Magnification Greivenkamp E. John 2019 © Copyright All optical systems that are used with the eye are characterized by a visual magnification or a visual magnifying power. While the details of the definitions of this quantity differ from instrument to instrument and for different applications, the underlying principle remains the same: How much bigger does an object appear to be when viewed through the instrument? The size change is measured as the change in angular subtense of the image produced by the instrument compared to the angular subtense of the object. The angular subtense of the object is measured when the object is placed at the optimum viewing condition. 13-3 I and Instrumentation Design Optical OPTI-502 Magnifiers Greivenkamp E. John 2019 © Copyright As an object is brought closer to the eye, the size of the image on the retina increases and the object appears larger. The largest image magnification possible with the unaided eye occurs when the object is placed at the near point of the eye, by convention 250 mm or 10 in from the eye. A magnifier is a single lens that provides an enlarged erect virtual image of a nearby object for visual observation. The object must be placed inside the front focal point of the magnifier. f h uM h F z z s The magnifying power MP is defined as (stop at the eye): Angular size of the image (with lens) MP Angular size of the object at the near point uM MP d NP 250 mm uU 13-4 I and Instrumentation Design Optical OPTI-502 Magnifiers – Magnifying Power Greivenkamp E.
    [Show full text]
  • Smartphone-Based Endoscope System for Advanced Point-Of-Care Diagnostics: Feasibility Study
    JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH Bae et al Original Paper Smartphone-Based Endoscope System for Advanced Point-of-Care Diagnostics: Feasibility Study Jung Kweon Bae1, MEng (Biomed Eng); Andrey Vavilin1, PhD; Joon S You1, PhD; Hyeongeun Kim1, BE; Seon Young Ryu2, PhD; Jeong Hun Jang3, MD; Woonggyu Jung1, PhD 1Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ulsan, Republic Of Korea 2Pohang University of Science and Technology, Creative IT Engineering, Pohang, Republic Of Korea 3Ajou University Hospital, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Suwon, Republic Of Korea Corresponding Author: Woonggyu Jung, PhD Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology Department of Biomedical Engineering 110dong, 709ho, 50 Unist gil Ulsan, 44919 Republic Of Korea Phone: 82 1084640110 Fax: 82 1084640110 Email: [email protected] Abstract Background: Endoscopic technique is often applied for the diagnosis of diseases affecting internal organs and image-guidance of surgical procedures. Although the endoscope has become an indispensable tool in the clinic, its utility has been limited to medical offices or operating rooms because of the large size of its ancillary devices. In addition, the basic design and imaging capability of the system have remained relatively unchanged for decades. Objective: The objective of this study was to develop a smartphone-based endoscope system capable of advanced endoscopic functionalities in a compact size and at an affordable cost and to demonstrate its feasibility of point-of-care through human subject imaging. Methods: We developed and designed to set up a smartphone-based endoscope system, incorporating a portable light source, relay-lens, custom adapter, and homebuilt Android app. We attached three different types of existing rigid or flexible endoscopic probes to our system and captured the endoscopic images using the homebuilt app.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 METAMATERIAL LENS DESIGN by Ralph Hamilton Shepard III
    Metamaterial Lens Design Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Shepard III, Ralph Hamilton Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 30/09/2021 22:36:57 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/194734 1 METAMATERIAL LENS DESIGN by Ralph Hamilton Shepard III ____________________________ Copyright © Ralph Hamilton Shepard III 2009 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the COLLEGE OF OPTICAL SCIENCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2009 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Ralph Hamilton Shepard III entitled Metamaterial Lens Design and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy ____________________________________________________________Date: 04/23/09 Jose Sasian ____________________________________________________________Date: 04/23/09 John Greivenkamp ____________________________________________________________Date: 04/23/09 Stanley Pau Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final
    [Show full text]
  • A Complete Optical Measurement and Testing System
    ® POWERED BY OPTEST 7 SOFTWARE A Complete Optical Measurement and Testing System ® OpTest System for VIS through LWIR, up to 600mm diameter, for any application LensCheck™ Instrument offered for smaller diameter lenses, low-volume production Understanding Lens and Image Quality Optical design and fabrication engineers understand that lens elements and optical systems are seldom perfect. Despite the presence of the most sophisticated design and manufacturing techniques, lenses can still vary considerably in quality. Optikos is a leader and pioneer in lens and image testing and our products and systems are based on over thirty- five years of experience and innovations in optical engineering. The result is that our customers are able to use the most advanced metrology tools for performing accurate and efficient lens and camera system measurements and improve their product quality and performance. Our flagship lens testing products include the OpTest® Lens Measurement System with a complete range of hardware options, and the LensCheck™ VIS and LWIR instruments—compact systems that are portable and easy-to-use for smaller lenses. Both are powered by OpTest® 7, Optikos® proprietary software. ® WHATEVER YOU DESIGN, YOU CAN MEASURE WITH OPTEST SYSTEMS The OpTest Lens Measurement System includes the latest technologies and innovations in optical and opto- mechanical engineering. Other products on the market typically manufacture their systems around general purpose off-the-shelf lab components, while every step of an Optikos solution is a custom one. OpTest systems are composed of custom optics, mechanics, and electronics designed by Optikos engineers solely for the purpose of lens testing. Optikos offers the most comprehensive product line for lens testing.
    [Show full text]
  • THE DESIGN and FABRICATION of an OPTICAL PERISCOPE for CORE VIEWING of FAST BREEDER TEST REACTOR (FBTR) by N C Das, San|Iva Kumar
    B A RC/2004/E/017 5 THE DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF AN OPTICAL PERISCOPE FOR CORE VIEWING OF FAST BREEDER TEST REACTOR (FBTR) by N C Das, San|iva Kumar. O.V Udupa and R P Shukla Spectroscopy Division and AM Kadu and R.K.Modi Division of Remote Handling and Robotics IN0501613 ÏTTTïï VWT Government of India «mur mmuj 3TJWIR Bhabha Atomic Research Centre ggf Mumbai - 400 085, wrw India 2004 BAR C/2004/E/017 GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION THE DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF AN OPTICAL PERISCOPE FOR CORE VIEWING OF FAST BREEDER TEST REACTOR (FBTR) by N.C. Das, Sanjiva Kumar, D.V. Udupaand R.P. Shukla Spectroscopy Division and A.M. Kadu and R. K Modi Division of Remote Handling and Robotics BHABHA ATOMIC RESEARCH CENTRE MUMBAI, INDIA 2004 BARC72OO4/E/0I7 BIBLIOGRAPHIC DESCRIPTION SHEET FOR TECHNICAL REPORT (•9 per IS : 9400 - 19H0) 01 Security classification : Unclassified 02 Distribution : External 03 Report status : New 04 Series : BARC External 05 Report type : Technical Report 06 Report No. : BARC/2004/E/017 07 Part No. or Volume No. : 08 Contract No. : 10 Title and subtitle : The design and fabrication of an optical periscope for core viewing of fast breeder test reactor (FBTR) I! Collation : 37 p., 13 figs. 13 Project No. 20 Personal author(s) : 1 ) N.C. Das; Sanjiva Kumar; D.V. Udupa; R.P Shukla 2) A.M. Kadu; R.K Modi 21 Affiliation of author(s) : 1 ) Spectroscopy Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 2) Division of Remote Handling and Robotics, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 22 Corporate author(s) : Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai-400 085 23 Originating unit : Spectroscopy Division, BARC, Mumbai 24 Sponsor(s) Name : Department of Atomic Energy Type Government Contd..
    [Show full text]
  • Optical Theory Simplified: 9 Fundamentals to Becoming an Optical Genius APPLICATION NOTES
    LEARNING – UNDERSTANDING – INTRODUCING – APPLYING Optical Theory Simplified: 9 Fundamentals To Becoming An Optical Genius APPLICATION NOTES Optics Application Examples Introduction To Prisms Understanding Optical Specifications Optical Cage System Design Examples All About Aspheric Lenses Optical Glass Optical Filters An Introduction to Optical Coatings Why Use An Achromatic Lens www.edmundoptics.com OPTICS APPLICATION EXAMPLES APPLICATION 1: DETECTOR SYSTEMS Every optical system requires some sort of preliminary design. system will help establish an initial plan. The following ques- Getting started with the design is often the most intimidating tions will illustrate the process of designing a simple detector step, but identifying several important specifications of the or emitter system. GOAL: WHERE WILL THE LIGHT GO? Although simple lenses are often used in imaging applications, such as a plano-convex (PCX) lens or double-convex (DCX) in many cases their goal is to project light from one point to lens, can be used. another within a system. Nearly all emitters, detectors, lasers, and fiber optics require a lens for this type of light manipula- Figure 1 shows a PCX lens, along with several important speci- tion. Before determining which type of system to design, an fications: Diameter of the lens (D1) and Focal Length (f). Figure important question to answer is “Where will the light go?” If 1 also illustrates how the diameter of the detector limits the the goal of the design is to get all incident light to fill a detector, Field of View (FOV) of the system, as shown by the approxi- with as few aberrations as possible, then a simple singlet lens, mation for Full Field of View (FFOV): (1.1) D Figure 1: 1 D θ PCX Lens as FOV Limit FF0V = 2 β in Detector Application ƒ Detector (D ) 2 or, by the exact equation: (1.2) / Field of View (β) -1 D FF0V = 2 tan ( 2 ) f 2ƒ For detectors used in scanning systems, the important mea- sure is the Instantaneous Field of View (IFOV), which is the angle subtended by the detector at any instant during scan- ning.
    [Show full text]
  • Microscope Components for Reflected Light Applications
    Microscope Components for Reflected Light Applications Microscope Components for Reflected Light Applications Select a Nikon microscope unit for your manufacturing equipment and other systems that require high precision The development, manufacture, and evaluation of products require sub-micron precision, as symbolized by semiconductor manufacturing technology. Nikon's microscope units support such high precision and can be integrated with a variety of equipment. This brochure presents technical data on using Nikon's microscope units. #ONTENTS L-IM Modular Focusing Unit 4 Revolving Nosepieces 17 LV-IM IM Modules 6 CF&IC Objectives 18-21 LV-FM FM Modules 7 Compact Reflected Microscopes CM Series 22-24 LVDIA-N DIA Base N 8 Objectives for Measuring microscopes 24 LV-ARM Basic Arm 9 2nd Objective Lens Units 25 LV-ECON E Controller 9 Filters 26 CFI60-2 / CFI60 Objectives 10-14 Eyepiece Tubes 27 LV-UEPI-N Universal Epi-Illuminator 14 Double Port 27 LV-UEPI2 Universal Epi-Illuminator 2 15 Straight Tubes 27 LV-UEPI2A Motorized Universal Epi-Illuminator 2 15 Eyepiece Lenses 28-29 TI-PS100W/A Power Supply 16 CCTV Camera Adapters 30 LV-EPILED White LED Illuminator 16 Glossary 31 CFI60-2/CFI60 Optical System (for modular focusing unit) 3YSTEM$IAGRAM)NDEX 02817 ")&37*5 02817 ")&37*5 > > 02817)&37*56 */&< $*/&< > > *16 *16 > 13928 13928 > "*0&= "*0&= */&<*16 *27 ? *27 ? 3$-'$"$$+/$/ # #(-( 6%( 9 )-!+ 9 9 .! )-!+ 9 9 9 (/5(3,/* .! 9 9 (-(4&01( 31#*()34$'2 +"('(&$ (+- .%+*+)'! .'*+!1(.1 # '(0'*%.'*+!1(.1 # .'*+!1(.1 # .'*+!1(.1 # '*+!1(.1 # '*+!1(.1 # ,& *( %*"%') 36136*.2+361&8.327**4&,* (.%!(+- ""*# $)%'( 5#(#2#( '/#.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Telescopes and Binoculars
    1 John E. Greivenkamp E. Greivenkamp and DavidL.Steed John and Binoculars Telescopes History of The History of Telescopes and Binoculars John E. Greivenkamp and David L. Steed College of Optical Sciences University of Arizona 1630 E. University Blvd. Tucson, AZ 85721 520-621-2942 [email protected] 2 John E. Greivenkamp E. Greivenkamp and DavidL.Steed John and Binoculars Telescopes History of How Made Me an Expert in Antique Optics Unless noted, the instruments in this presentation are from the Museum of Optics at the College of Optical Sciences, University of Arizona. They can be viewed on-line at www.optics.arizona.edu/museum 3 Modern Prism Binoculars E. Greivenkamp and DavidL.Steed John and Binoculars Telescopes History of In astronomical telescopes the image is inverted. In order to obtain the proper image orientation, binoculars make use of a prism assembly to erect the image. Porro Prism System This type of prism can be considered to be a series of flat mirrors. 4 Porro Prism System E. Greivenkamp and DavidL.Steed John and Binoculars Telescopes History of The reflections are often based upon total internal reflection. 5 Audience Participation - Quiz E. Greivenkamp and DavidL.Steed John and Binoculars Telescopes History of When was the Porro Prism System invented? a) 1704 b) 1754 c) 1804 d) 1854 e) 1904 6 Glass and Brass E. Greivenkamp and DavidL.Steed John and Binoculars Telescopes History of The development of practical handheld refracting telescopes and binoculars is much more than the story of optical design. Advances in mechanical design, manufacturing technology, materials and optical glass were critical.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Measure MTF and Other Properties of Lenses
    How to Measure MTF and other Properties of Lenses Optikos Corporation 107 Audubon Rd Bldg 3 Wakefield, MA 01880 USA (617) 354-7557 www.optikos.com e-mail [email protected] July 16, 1999 © Optikos Corporation, 1999 All Rights Reserved Rev. 2.0 #4-04-001 1 2 Introduction With the growing role played by optical devices in measurement, communication, and photonics, there is a clear need for characterizing optical components. A basic and useful parameter, especially for imaging systems, is the Modulation Transfer Function, or MTF. Over the past few decades new instruments, including the laser interferometer, the CCD Camera, and the Computer have revolutionized the measurement and calculation of the MTF. This has made what was once a tedious and involved process into virtually an instantaneous measurement. This booklet is designed to provide insight into the theory and practice of measuring the Modulation Transfer Function and related quantities. While a booklet of this size cannot begin to address all the intricacies and subtleties of testing, it is intended to provide a foundation for understanding, and to introduce the reader to the fundamentals of testing. Various tests and test techniques are described in detail and in concept. Four articles by Optikos staff have been adapted for this booklet: 1. “Why Measure MTF?” identifies the many reasons for the popularity of MTF as a measured quantity and describes the relationship between MTF measurement and other technologies. 2. “Geometric Lens Measurement” is an article that summarizes the field of geometric lens measurement (non-interferometric measurement), and the recent advances which have brought new attention to traditional testing.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachable Micro-Endoscopy System to Conventional Microscope for Live Mouse Organ Imaging Using 4F Configuration
    Attachable Micro-endoscopy System to Conventional Microscope for Live Mouse Organ Imaging using 4f Configuration Yoon Sung Bae1,2, Jae Young Kim3 and Jun Ki Kim1,2 1Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Science, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea 2University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro, 43-gil, Songpagu, Seoul, Korea 3Research Institute for Skin Imaging, Korea University Medical Center, Guro2-dong, Guro-gu, Seoul, Korea Keywords: Micro-endoscopy, Confocal Endoscope, Confocal Endoscopy, GRIN Lens. Abstract: The Micro-endoscopic technology combined with optical imaging system is essential for minimally invasive optical diagnosis and treatment in small animal disease models. Thus, the high resolution optical probe is required to achieve high resolution imaging. However, the optical imaging system requires highly precise and advanced technologies which are the main reasons for increasing system cost. Advancements in micro-optics and fiber optics technology have paved way in supporting compatibility among optical components. By providing compatibility between endoscopic system and existing conventional imaging equipment such as macro- or micro-scope, we could achieve in not only carrying out the high quality micro-endoscopic image procedure, but also reducing prices of the imaging system. The proposed system could be widely useful in the field of further biological study of animal disease model. 1 INTRODUCTION Karl Stortz, Mauna Kea Technologis and Olympus, the confocal endomicroscopy has higher resolution For the basic biology and preclinical study, the and enables minimum invasive. At the same time, experimental animal study is widely accepted for the confocal fluorescence system allows optical secure confirmation the biological hypothesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Assessment of Compact Optical Systems Towards Special Effects Imaging
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2005 Design And Assessment Of Compact Optical Systems Towards Special Effects Imaging Vesselin Chaoulov University of Central Florida Part of the Electromagnetics and Photonics Commons, and the Optics Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Doctoral Dissertation (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Chaoulov, Vesselin, "Design And Assessment Of Compact Optical Systems Towards Special Effects Imaging" (2005). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 295. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/295 DESIGN AND ASSESSMENT OF COMPACT OPTICAL SYSTEMS TOWARDS SPECIAL EFFECTS IMAGING by VESSELIN IOSSIFOV SHAOULOV B.S. Sofia University, 1994 M.S. Sofia University, 1996 M.S. University of Central Florida, 2003 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the College of Optics and Photonics at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2005 Major Professor: Jannick P. Rolland © 2004 Vesselin I. Shaoulov iii ABSTRACT A main challenge in the field of special effects is to create special effects in real time in a way that the user can preview the effect before taking the actual picture or movie sequence. There are many techniques currently used to create computer-simulated special effects, however current techniques in computer graphics do not provide the option for the creation of real-time texture synthesis.
    [Show full text]
  • RELAY LENS SYSTEM for FOCUS and PHOTOMONTAGE* by Clark, L.D., Brown, B.A., and Davids, W.T
    EXTERNALLY ACTUABLE PHOTO-EYEPIECE RELAY LENS SYSTEM FOR FOCUS AND PHOTOMONTAGE* by Clark, L.D., Brown, B.A., and Davids, W.T. ABSTRACT A relay lens assembly for use with a microscope, telescope, or binocular, comprises a lens element that is responsive to commands, conveyed from a control unit, via a conduit between the control unit and the lens element. A computing device controls operation of the lens assembly and a digital camera that has an image sensor. The control unit causes the lens assembly to assume any of a plurality of predetermined focal lengths so that different depths of an object being imaged can be rendered in-focus on the sensor. A series of images can be taken at predetermined, computer- controlled focal depths. These images can be processed in order to create a photomontage that is in focus at a plurality of predetermined depths in a process commonly called focus-stacking. The addition of a plurality of data input and analysis units and a combiner makes rapid processing of individual images possible for photomontage at video rates. BACKGROUND—Movable Objective Lens For Use With Microscopes Physikinstrumente GMBH & Co. of Karlsruhe, Germany sell a movable objective lens assembly for use with microscopes. Their model P-725 scanner uses a piezoelectric element and associated drive electronics to move a microscope objective in the axial direction, thereby moving the focus nearer to or farther from a datum position. The response time for a 250 micron step is 50 ms with a 150g load. The axial motion response time of this apparatus is sufficient for some of the lower-speed applications described herein, however the mounting requirements of the assembly interfere with easy changing of the microscope objective during use.
    [Show full text]