Chapter 2 Afocal Systems

Chapter 2 Afocal Systems

CHAPTER 2 AFOCAL SYSTEMS William B . Wetherell Optical Research Associates Framingham , Massachusetts 2. 1 GLOSSARY BFL back focal length D pupil diameter ER c p eye relief common pupil position ER k eye relief keplerian e exit pupil ; eye space F , F 9 focal points FFL front focal length h , h 9 object and image heights l , l 9 object and image distances M angular magnification m linear , lateral magnification n refractive index OR object relief o entrance pupil ; object space P , P 9 principal points R radius TTL total length tan a slope x , y , z cartesian coordinates D z axial separation 2. 2 INTRODUCTION If collimated (parallel) light rays from an infinitely distant point source fall incident on the input end of a lens system , rays exiting from the output end will show one of three characteristics : (1) they will converge to a real point focus outside the lens system , (2) they will appear to diverge from a virtual point focus within the lens system , or (3) they will 2 .1 2 .2 OPTICAL ELEMENTS emerge as collimated rays that may dif fer in some characteristics from the incident collimated rays . In cases 1 and 2 , the paraxial imaging properties of the lens system can be modeled accurately by a characteristic focal length and a set of fixed principal surfaces . Such lens systems might be called focusing or focal lenses , but are usually referred to simply as lenses . In case 3 , a single finite focal length cannot model the paraxial characteristics of the lens system ; in ef fect , the focal length is infinite , with the output focal point an infinite distance behind the lens , and the associated principal surface an infinite distance in front of the lens . Such lens systems are referred to as afocal , or without focal length . They will be called afocal lenses here , following the common practice of using ‘‘lens’’ to refer to both single element and multielement lens systems . They are the topic of this chapter . The first afocal lens was the galilean telescope (to be described later) , a visual telescope made famous by Galileo’s astronomical observations . It is now believed to have been invented by Hans Lipperhey in 1608 . 1 Afocal lenses are usually thought of in the context of viewing instruments or attachments to change the ef fective focal length of focusing lenses , whose outputs are always collimated . In fact , afocal lenses can form real images of real objects . A more useful distinction between focusing and afocal lenses concerns which optical parameters are fixed , and which can vary in use . Focusing lenses have a fixed , finite focal length , can produce real images for a wide range of object distances , and have a linear magnification which varies with object distance . Afocal lenses have a fixed magnification which is independent of object distance , and the range of object distances yielding real images is severely restricted . This chapter is divided into six sections , including this introduction . The second section reviews the Gaussian (paraxial) image forming characteristics of afocal lenses and compares them to the properties of focusing lenses . The importance of the optical invariant in designing afocal lenses is discussed . The third section reviews the keplerian telescope and its descendants , including both infinite conjugate and finite conjugate variants . The fourth section discusses the galilean telescope and its descendants . Thin-lens models are used in the third and fourth sections to define imaging characteristics and design principles for afocal lenses . The fifth section reviews relay trains and periscopes . The final section reviews reflecting and catadioptric afocal lenses . This chapter is based on an earlier article by Wetherell . 2 That article contains derivations of many of the equations appearing here , as well as a more extensive list of patents illustrating dif ferent types of afocal lens systems . 2. 3 GAUSSIAN ANALYSIS OF AFOCAL LENSES Afocal lenses dif fer from focusing lenses in ways that are not always obvious . It is useful to review the basic image-forming characteristics of focusing lenses before defining the characteristics unique to afocal lenses . Focusing Lenses In this chapter , all lens elements are assumed to be immersed in air , so that object space and image space have the same index of refraction . Points in object space and image space are represented by two rectangular coordinate systems ( x , y , z ) and ( x 9 , y 9 , z 9 ) , with the prime indicating image space . The z - and z 9 -axes form a common line in space , the optical axis of the system . It is assumed , unless noted otherwise , that all lens elements are rotationally symmetric with respect to the optical axis . Under these conditions , the imaging geometry of a focusing lens can be defined in terms of two principal points P and P 9 , two focal points F and F 9 , and a single characteristic focal length f , as shown in Fig . 1 . P , P 9 , F , and F 9 all lie on the optical axis . AFOCAL SYSTEMS 2 .3 FIGURE 1 Imaging geometry of focusing lenses . The focal points F and F 9 , will be the origins for the coordinate systems ( x , y , z ) and ( x 9 , y 9 , z 9 ) . If the origins are at P and P 9 , the coordinates will be given as ( x , y , s ) and ( x 9 , y 9 , s 9 ) , where s 5 z 2 f and s 9 5 z 9 1 f . Normal right-hand sign conventions are used for each set of coordinates , and light travels along the z -axis from negative z toward positive z 9 , unless the optical system has internal mirrors . Figure 1 a illustrates the terminology for finite conjugate objects . Object points and image points are assumed to lie in planes normal to the optical axis , for paraxial computations . Object distance is specified by the axial distance to the object surface , z or s , and image distance by z 9 or s 9 . The two most commonly used equations relating image distance to object distance are 1 1 1 2 5 (1) s 9 s f and zz 9 5 2 f 2 (2) For infinitely distant object points , z 9 5 0 and s 9 5 f , and the corresponding image points will lie in the focal plane at F 9 . To determine the actual distance from object plane to image plane , it is necessary to know the distance sp between P and P 9 . The value of sp is a constant specific to each real lens system , and may be either positive [moving object and image further apart than predicted by Eqs . (1) or (2)] or negative (moving them closer together) . For rotationally symmetric systems , of f-axis object and image coordinates can be expressed by the object height h and image height h 9 , where h 2 5 x 2 1 y 2 and h 9 2 5 x 9 2 1 y 9 2 . Object height and image height are related by the linear magnification m , where h 9 s 9 z 9 1 f m 5 5 5 (3) h s z 2 f 2 .4 OPTICAL ELEMENTS Since the product zz 9 is a constant , Eq . (3) implies that magnification varies with object distance . The principal surfaces of a focusing lens intersect the optical axis at the principal points P and P 9 . In paraxial analysis , the principal surfaces are planes normal to the optical axis ; for real lenses , they may be curved . The principal surfaces are conjugate image surfaces for which m 5 1 1 . 0 . This property makes the raytrace construction shown in Fig . 1 a possible , since a ray traveling parallel to the optical axis in either object or image space must intersect the focal point in the conjugate space , and must also intersect both principal surfaces at the same height . In real lenses , the object and image surfaces may be tilted or curved . Planes normal to the optical axis are still used to define object and image positions for of f-axis object points , and to compute magnification . For tilted object surfaces , the properties of the principal surfaces can be used to relate object surface and image surface tilt angles , as shown in Fig . 1 b . Tilted object and image planes intersect the optical axis and the two principal planes . The tilt angles with respect to the optical axis , u and u 9 , are defined by meridional rays lying in the two surfaces . The points at which conjugate tilted planes intercept the optical axis are defined by s a and s a9 , given by Eq . (1) . Both object and image planes must intersect their respective principal surfaces at the same height y , where y 5 s a tan u 5 s 9a tan u 9 . It follows that tan u 9 s 1 5 a 5 (4) tan u s a9 m a The geometry of Fig . 1 b is known as the Scheimpflug condition , and Eq . (4) is the Scheimpflug rule , relating image to object tilt . The magnification m a applies only to the axial image . The height of f axis of an infinitely distant object is defined by the principal ray angle u p measured from F or P , as shown in Fig . 1 c . In this case , the image height is h 9 5 f tan u p (5) A focusing lens which obeys Eq . (5) for all values of u p within a specified range is said to be distortion - free : if the object is a set of equally spaced parallel lines lying in an object plane perpendicular to the optical axis , it will be imaged as a set of equally spaced parallel lines in an image plane perpendicular to the optical axis , with line spacing proportional to m .

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    23 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us