Chapter 1.1 1.1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 1.1 1.1 Chapter 1.1 1.1 Geometrical optics Menn 1.1.1. Ray optics conventions and In most cases experienced in practice, imaging systems are based on lenses (exceptions are the imaging systems practical rules. Real and virtual with curved mirrors). objects and images The functioning of any optical element, as well as the whole system, can be described either in terms of ray Electro-optical systems are intended for the transfer and optics or in terms of wave optics. The first case is usually transformation of radiant energy. They consist of active called the geometrical optics approach while the second and passive elements and sub-systems. In active ele- is called physical optics. In reality there are many situa- ments, like radiation sources and radiation sensors, con- tions when we need both (for example, in image quality version of energy takes place (radiant energy is converted evaluation, see Chapter 2). But, since each approach has into electrical energy and vice versa, chemical energy is advantages and disadvantages in practical use, it is im- converted in radiation and vice versa, etc.). Passive ele- portant to know where and how to exploit each one in ments (like mirrors, lenses, prisms, etc.) do not convert order to minimize the complexity of consideration and to energy, but affect the spatial distribution of radiation. avoid wasting time and effort. Passive elements of electro-optical systems are fre- This chapter is related to geometrical optics, or, more quently termed optical systems. specifically, to ray optics. Actually an optical ray is Following this terminology, an optical system itself a mathematical simplification: it is a line with no thick- does not perform any transformation of radiation into ness. In reality optical beams which consist of an endless other kinds of energy, but is aimed primarily at changing quantity of optical rays are created and transferred by the spatial distribution of radiant energy propagated in electro-optical systems. Naturally, there exist three kinds space. Sometimes only concentration of radiation of optical beams: parallel, divergent, and convergent (see somewhere in space is required (like in the systems for Fig. 1.1.1). If a beam, either divergent or convergent, has medical treatment of tissues or systems for material a single point of intersection of all optical rays it is called processing of fabricated parts). In other cases the ability a homocentric beam (Fig. 1.1.1b,c). An example of of optics to create light distribution similar in some way a non-homocentric beam is shown in Fig. 1.1.1 d. Such to the light intensity profile of an ‘‘object’’ is exploited. Such a procedure is called imaging and the corresponding optical system is addressed as an imaging optical system. Of all the passive optical elements (prisms, mirrors, filters, lenses, etc.) lenses are usually our main concern. It is lenses that allow one to concentrate optical energy or to get a specific distribution of light energy at different Fig. 1.1.1 Optical beams: (a) parallel, (b,c) homocentric and points in space (in other words, to create an ‘‘image’’). (d) non-homocentric. Practical Optics; ISBN: 9780124909519 Copyright Ó 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights of reproduction, in any form, reserved. SECTION ONE Optical Theory optical rays propagating through the system. Radiation propagates from the left to the right and, consequently, the object space (part of space where the light sources or the objects are located) is to the left of the system. The image space (part of space where the light detectors or images are located) is to the right of the system. All relevant values describing optical systems can be Fig. 1.1.2 Reflection and refraction of radiation. positive or negative and obey the following sign conven- tions and rules: a convergent beam could be the result of different phe- ray angles are calculated relative to the optical axis; the nomena occurring in optical systems (see Chapter 2 for angle of a ray is positive if the ray should be rotated more details). counterclockwise in order to coincide with OX, Ray optics is primarily based on two simple physical otherwise the angle is negative; laws: the law of reflection and the law of refraction. Both vertical segments are positive above OX and negative are applicable when a light beam is incident on a surface below OX; separating two optical media, with two different indexes horizontal segments should start from the optical system of refraction, n1 and n2 (see Fig. 1.1.2). The first law is and end at the relevant point according to the seg- just a statement that the incident angle, i, is equal to the ment definition. If going from the starting point to reflection angle, i’. The second law defines the relation the end we move left (against propagated radiation), between the incident angle and the angle of refraction, r: the segment is negative; if we should move right (in the direction of propagated radiation), the sinðiÞ=sinðrÞ¼n2=n1: (1.1.1) corresponding segment is positive. Examples are demonstrated in Fig. 1.1.3. The angle u is It is important to mention that all angles are measured negative (clockwise rotation of the ray to OX) whereas u0 from the vertical line perpendicular to the surface at the is positive. The object Y is positive and its image Y0 is point of incidence (so that the normal incidence of light negative. The segment S defines the object distance. It means that i i0 r 0). ¼ ¼ ¼ starts from the point O (from the system) and ends at In the geometrical optics approach the following as- the object (at Y). Since we move from O to Y against the sumptions are conventionally accepted: light, this segment is negative (S < 0). Accordingly, the (a) radiation is propagated along a straight line trajec- segment S0 (distance to the image) starts from the system tory (this means that diffraction effects are not (point O’) and ends at the image Y0. Since in this case we taken into account); move in the direction of propagated light (from left to 0 (b) if two beams intersect each other in space there is right) this segment is positive (S > 0). no interaction between them and each one is prop- The procedure of imaging is based on the basic as- agated as if the second one does not appear (this sumption that any object is considered as a collection of means that interference effects are not taken into separate points, each one being the center of a homo- account); centric divergent beam coming to the optical system. The optical system transfers all these beams, converting each (c) ray tracing is invertable; in other words, if the ray one to a convergent beam concentrated in a small spot trajectory is found while the ray is propagated (ideally a point) which is considered as an image of the through the system from input to output (say, from corresponding point of the object. The collection of such the left to the right) and then a new ray comes to the ‘‘point images’’ creates an image of the whole object (see same system along the outgoing line of the first ray, Fig. 1.1.4). but propagates in the reverse direction (from the An ideal imaging is a procedure when all homocentric right to the left), the trajectory of the second ray optical beams remain homocentric after traveling inside and outside of the system is identical to that of the first ray and it goes out of the system along the incident line of the first ray. Normally an optical system is assumed to be axisym- metrical, with the optical axis going along OX in the horizontal direction. Objects and images are usually lo- cated in the planes perpendicular to the optical axes, meaning that they are along the OY (vertical) axis. Ray tracing is a procedure of calculating the trajectory of Fig. 1.1.3 Sign conventions. 4 Geometrical optics CHAPTER 1.1 focal point or just focus). In such a case the only pa- rameter of the lens is its focal length, f 0, measured as the distance between the lens plane and the focus, F0. Each lens has two focuses: the back (F0) and the front (F), the first being the point where the rays belonging to a parallel beam incident on the lens from the left are concentrated and the second being the center of the concentrated rays when a parallel beam comes to the lens from the right. Fig. 1.1.4 Concept of image formation. Obviously, if the mediums at both sides of the lens are identical (for example, air on both sides or the lens being in water) then f 0¼f. In the case when the mediums are through the optical system, up to the image plane (this different (having refractive index n and n0 correspond- case is demonstrated in Fig. 1.1.4). Unfortunately, in real ingly) the relation should be imaging the outgoing beams become non-homocentric which, of course, ‘‘spoils’’ the images and makes it im- nf0 ¼n0f: (1.1.2) possible to reproduce the finest details of the object (this is like a situation when we try to draw a picture using The optical power of a lens, defined as a pencil which is not sharp enough and makes only thick 0 lines – obviously we fail to draw the small and fine details f ¼ 1=f ; (1.1.3) on the picture). The reasons for such degradation in is used sometimes in system analysis, as we shall see later. image quality lie partially in geometrical optics (then Imaging with a simple thin lens obeys the two fol- they are termed optical aberrations) and partially are due lowing equations: to the principal limitations of wave optics (diffraction limit).
Recommended publications
  • 502-13 Magnifiers and Telescopes
    13-1 I and Instrumentation Design Optical OPTI-502 © Copyright 2019 John E. Greivenkamp E. John 2019 © Copyright Section 13 Magnifiers and Telescopes 13-2 I and Instrumentation Design Optical OPTI-502 Visual Magnification Greivenkamp E. John 2019 © Copyright All optical systems that are used with the eye are characterized by a visual magnification or a visual magnifying power. While the details of the definitions of this quantity differ from instrument to instrument and for different applications, the underlying principle remains the same: How much bigger does an object appear to be when viewed through the instrument? The size change is measured as the change in angular subtense of the image produced by the instrument compared to the angular subtense of the object. The angular subtense of the object is measured when the object is placed at the optimum viewing condition. 13-3 I and Instrumentation Design Optical OPTI-502 Magnifiers Greivenkamp E. John 2019 © Copyright As an object is brought closer to the eye, the size of the image on the retina increases and the object appears larger. The largest image magnification possible with the unaided eye occurs when the object is placed at the near point of the eye, by convention 250 mm or 10 in from the eye. A magnifier is a single lens that provides an enlarged erect virtual image of a nearby object for visual observation. The object must be placed inside the front focal point of the magnifier. f h uM h F z z s The magnifying power MP is defined as (stop at the eye): Angular size of the image (with lens) MP Angular size of the object at the near point uM MP d NP 250 mm uU 13-4 I and Instrumentation Design Optical OPTI-502 Magnifiers – Magnifying Power Greivenkamp E.
    [Show full text]
  • Smartphone-Based Endoscope System for Advanced Point-Of-Care Diagnostics: Feasibility Study
    JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH Bae et al Original Paper Smartphone-Based Endoscope System for Advanced Point-of-Care Diagnostics: Feasibility Study Jung Kweon Bae1, MEng (Biomed Eng); Andrey Vavilin1, PhD; Joon S You1, PhD; Hyeongeun Kim1, BE; Seon Young Ryu2, PhD; Jeong Hun Jang3, MD; Woonggyu Jung1, PhD 1Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ulsan, Republic Of Korea 2Pohang University of Science and Technology, Creative IT Engineering, Pohang, Republic Of Korea 3Ajou University Hospital, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Suwon, Republic Of Korea Corresponding Author: Woonggyu Jung, PhD Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology Department of Biomedical Engineering 110dong, 709ho, 50 Unist gil Ulsan, 44919 Republic Of Korea Phone: 82 1084640110 Fax: 82 1084640110 Email: [email protected] Abstract Background: Endoscopic technique is often applied for the diagnosis of diseases affecting internal organs and image-guidance of surgical procedures. Although the endoscope has become an indispensable tool in the clinic, its utility has been limited to medical offices or operating rooms because of the large size of its ancillary devices. In addition, the basic design and imaging capability of the system have remained relatively unchanged for decades. Objective: The objective of this study was to develop a smartphone-based endoscope system capable of advanced endoscopic functionalities in a compact size and at an affordable cost and to demonstrate its feasibility of point-of-care through human subject imaging. Methods: We developed and designed to set up a smartphone-based endoscope system, incorporating a portable light source, relay-lens, custom adapter, and homebuilt Android app. We attached three different types of existing rigid or flexible endoscopic probes to our system and captured the endoscopic images using the homebuilt app.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 METAMATERIAL LENS DESIGN by Ralph Hamilton Shepard III
    Metamaterial Lens Design Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Shepard III, Ralph Hamilton Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 30/09/2021 22:36:57 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/194734 1 METAMATERIAL LENS DESIGN by Ralph Hamilton Shepard III ____________________________ Copyright © Ralph Hamilton Shepard III 2009 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the COLLEGE OF OPTICAL SCIENCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2009 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Ralph Hamilton Shepard III entitled Metamaterial Lens Design and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy ____________________________________________________________Date: 04/23/09 Jose Sasian ____________________________________________________________Date: 04/23/09 John Greivenkamp ____________________________________________________________Date: 04/23/09 Stanley Pau Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Afocal Systems
    CHAPTER 2 AFOCAL SYSTEMS William B . Wetherell Optical Research Associates Framingham , Massachusetts 2. 1 GLOSSARY BFL back focal length D pupil diameter ER c p eye relief common pupil position ER k eye relief keplerian e exit pupil ; eye space F , F 9 focal points FFL front focal length h , h 9 object and image heights l , l 9 object and image distances M angular magnification m linear , lateral magnification n refractive index OR object relief o entrance pupil ; object space P , P 9 principal points R radius TTL total length tan a slope x , y , z cartesian coordinates D z axial separation 2. 2 INTRODUCTION If collimated (parallel) light rays from an infinitely distant point source fall incident on the input end of a lens system , rays exiting from the output end will show one of three characteristics : (1) they will converge to a real point focus outside the lens system , (2) they will appear to diverge from a virtual point focus within the lens system , or (3) they will 2 .1 2 .2 OPTICAL ELEMENTS emerge as collimated rays that may dif fer in some characteristics from the incident collimated rays . In cases 1 and 2 , the paraxial imaging properties of the lens system can be modeled accurately by a characteristic focal length and a set of fixed principal surfaces . Such lens systems might be called focusing or focal lenses , but are usually referred to simply as lenses . In case 3 , a single finite focal length cannot model the paraxial characteristics of the lens system ; in ef fect , the focal length is infinite , with the output focal point an infinite distance behind the lens , and the associated principal surface an infinite distance in front of the lens .
    [Show full text]
  • A Complete Optical Measurement and Testing System
    ® POWERED BY OPTEST 7 SOFTWARE A Complete Optical Measurement and Testing System ® OpTest System for VIS through LWIR, up to 600mm diameter, for any application LensCheck™ Instrument offered for smaller diameter lenses, low-volume production Understanding Lens and Image Quality Optical design and fabrication engineers understand that lens elements and optical systems are seldom perfect. Despite the presence of the most sophisticated design and manufacturing techniques, lenses can still vary considerably in quality. Optikos is a leader and pioneer in lens and image testing and our products and systems are based on over thirty- five years of experience and innovations in optical engineering. The result is that our customers are able to use the most advanced metrology tools for performing accurate and efficient lens and camera system measurements and improve their product quality and performance. Our flagship lens testing products include the OpTest® Lens Measurement System with a complete range of hardware options, and the LensCheck™ VIS and LWIR instruments—compact systems that are portable and easy-to-use for smaller lenses. Both are powered by OpTest® 7, Optikos® proprietary software. ® WHATEVER YOU DESIGN, YOU CAN MEASURE WITH OPTEST SYSTEMS The OpTest Lens Measurement System includes the latest technologies and innovations in optical and opto- mechanical engineering. Other products on the market typically manufacture their systems around general purpose off-the-shelf lab components, while every step of an Optikos solution is a custom one. OpTest systems are composed of custom optics, mechanics, and electronics designed by Optikos engineers solely for the purpose of lens testing. Optikos offers the most comprehensive product line for lens testing.
    [Show full text]
  • THE DESIGN and FABRICATION of an OPTICAL PERISCOPE for CORE VIEWING of FAST BREEDER TEST REACTOR (FBTR) by N C Das, San|Iva Kumar
    B A RC/2004/E/017 5 THE DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF AN OPTICAL PERISCOPE FOR CORE VIEWING OF FAST BREEDER TEST REACTOR (FBTR) by N C Das, San|iva Kumar. O.V Udupa and R P Shukla Spectroscopy Division and AM Kadu and R.K.Modi Division of Remote Handling and Robotics IN0501613 ÏTTTïï VWT Government of India «mur mmuj 3TJWIR Bhabha Atomic Research Centre ggf Mumbai - 400 085, wrw India 2004 BAR C/2004/E/017 GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION THE DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF AN OPTICAL PERISCOPE FOR CORE VIEWING OF FAST BREEDER TEST REACTOR (FBTR) by N.C. Das, Sanjiva Kumar, D.V. Udupaand R.P. Shukla Spectroscopy Division and A.M. Kadu and R. K Modi Division of Remote Handling and Robotics BHABHA ATOMIC RESEARCH CENTRE MUMBAI, INDIA 2004 BARC72OO4/E/0I7 BIBLIOGRAPHIC DESCRIPTION SHEET FOR TECHNICAL REPORT (•9 per IS : 9400 - 19H0) 01 Security classification : Unclassified 02 Distribution : External 03 Report status : New 04 Series : BARC External 05 Report type : Technical Report 06 Report No. : BARC/2004/E/017 07 Part No. or Volume No. : 08 Contract No. : 10 Title and subtitle : The design and fabrication of an optical periscope for core viewing of fast breeder test reactor (FBTR) I! Collation : 37 p., 13 figs. 13 Project No. 20 Personal author(s) : 1 ) N.C. Das; Sanjiva Kumar; D.V. Udupa; R.P Shukla 2) A.M. Kadu; R.K Modi 21 Affiliation of author(s) : 1 ) Spectroscopy Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 2) Division of Remote Handling and Robotics, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 22 Corporate author(s) : Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai-400 085 23 Originating unit : Spectroscopy Division, BARC, Mumbai 24 Sponsor(s) Name : Department of Atomic Energy Type Government Contd..
    [Show full text]
  • Optical Theory Simplified: 9 Fundamentals to Becoming an Optical Genius APPLICATION NOTES
    LEARNING – UNDERSTANDING – INTRODUCING – APPLYING Optical Theory Simplified: 9 Fundamentals To Becoming An Optical Genius APPLICATION NOTES Optics Application Examples Introduction To Prisms Understanding Optical Specifications Optical Cage System Design Examples All About Aspheric Lenses Optical Glass Optical Filters An Introduction to Optical Coatings Why Use An Achromatic Lens www.edmundoptics.com OPTICS APPLICATION EXAMPLES APPLICATION 1: DETECTOR SYSTEMS Every optical system requires some sort of preliminary design. system will help establish an initial plan. The following ques- Getting started with the design is often the most intimidating tions will illustrate the process of designing a simple detector step, but identifying several important specifications of the or emitter system. GOAL: WHERE WILL THE LIGHT GO? Although simple lenses are often used in imaging applications, such as a plano-convex (PCX) lens or double-convex (DCX) in many cases their goal is to project light from one point to lens, can be used. another within a system. Nearly all emitters, detectors, lasers, and fiber optics require a lens for this type of light manipula- Figure 1 shows a PCX lens, along with several important speci- tion. Before determining which type of system to design, an fications: Diameter of the lens (D1) and Focal Length (f). Figure important question to answer is “Where will the light go?” If 1 also illustrates how the diameter of the detector limits the the goal of the design is to get all incident light to fill a detector, Field of View (FOV) of the system, as shown by the approxi- with as few aberrations as possible, then a simple singlet lens, mation for Full Field of View (FFOV): (1.1) D Figure 1: 1 D θ PCX Lens as FOV Limit FF0V = 2 β in Detector Application ƒ Detector (D ) 2 or, by the exact equation: (1.2) / Field of View (β) -1 D FF0V = 2 tan ( 2 ) f 2ƒ For detectors used in scanning systems, the important mea- sure is the Instantaneous Field of View (IFOV), which is the angle subtended by the detector at any instant during scan- ning.
    [Show full text]
  • Microscope Components for Reflected Light Applications
    Microscope Components for Reflected Light Applications Microscope Components for Reflected Light Applications Select a Nikon microscope unit for your manufacturing equipment and other systems that require high precision The development, manufacture, and evaluation of products require sub-micron precision, as symbolized by semiconductor manufacturing technology. Nikon's microscope units support such high precision and can be integrated with a variety of equipment. This brochure presents technical data on using Nikon's microscope units. #ONTENTS L-IM Modular Focusing Unit 4 Revolving Nosepieces 17 LV-IM IM Modules 6 CF&IC Objectives 18-21 LV-FM FM Modules 7 Compact Reflected Microscopes CM Series 22-24 LVDIA-N DIA Base N 8 Objectives for Measuring microscopes 24 LV-ARM Basic Arm 9 2nd Objective Lens Units 25 LV-ECON E Controller 9 Filters 26 CFI60-2 / CFI60 Objectives 10-14 Eyepiece Tubes 27 LV-UEPI-N Universal Epi-Illuminator 14 Double Port 27 LV-UEPI2 Universal Epi-Illuminator 2 15 Straight Tubes 27 LV-UEPI2A Motorized Universal Epi-Illuminator 2 15 Eyepiece Lenses 28-29 TI-PS100W/A Power Supply 16 CCTV Camera Adapters 30 LV-EPILED White LED Illuminator 16 Glossary 31 CFI60-2/CFI60 Optical System (for modular focusing unit) 3YSTEM$IAGRAM)NDEX 02817 ")&37*5 02817 ")&37*5 > > 02817)&37*56 */&< $*/&< > > *16 *16 > 13928 13928 > "*0&= "*0&= */&<*16 *27 ? *27 ? 3$-'$"$$+/$/ # #(-( 6%( 9 )-!+ 9 9 .! )-!+ 9 9 9 (/5(3,/* .! 9 9 (-(4&01( 31#*()34$'2 +"('(&$ (+- .%+*+)'! .'*+!1(.1 # '(0'*%.'*+!1(.1 # .'*+!1(.1 # .'*+!1(.1 # '*+!1(.1 # '*+!1(.1 # ,& *( %*"%') 36136*.2+361&8.327**4&,* (.%!(+- ""*# $)%'( 5#(#2#( '/#.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Telescopes and Binoculars
    1 John E. Greivenkamp E. Greivenkamp and DavidL.Steed John and Binoculars Telescopes History of The History of Telescopes and Binoculars John E. Greivenkamp and David L. Steed College of Optical Sciences University of Arizona 1630 E. University Blvd. Tucson, AZ 85721 520-621-2942 [email protected] 2 John E. Greivenkamp E. Greivenkamp and DavidL.Steed John and Binoculars Telescopes History of How Made Me an Expert in Antique Optics Unless noted, the instruments in this presentation are from the Museum of Optics at the College of Optical Sciences, University of Arizona. They can be viewed on-line at www.optics.arizona.edu/museum 3 Modern Prism Binoculars E. Greivenkamp and DavidL.Steed John and Binoculars Telescopes History of In astronomical telescopes the image is inverted. In order to obtain the proper image orientation, binoculars make use of a prism assembly to erect the image. Porro Prism System This type of prism can be considered to be a series of flat mirrors. 4 Porro Prism System E. Greivenkamp and DavidL.Steed John and Binoculars Telescopes History of The reflections are often based upon total internal reflection. 5 Audience Participation - Quiz E. Greivenkamp and DavidL.Steed John and Binoculars Telescopes History of When was the Porro Prism System invented? a) 1704 b) 1754 c) 1804 d) 1854 e) 1904 6 Glass and Brass E. Greivenkamp and DavidL.Steed John and Binoculars Telescopes History of The development of practical handheld refracting telescopes and binoculars is much more than the story of optical design. Advances in mechanical design, manufacturing technology, materials and optical glass were critical.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Measure MTF and Other Properties of Lenses
    How to Measure MTF and other Properties of Lenses Optikos Corporation 107 Audubon Rd Bldg 3 Wakefield, MA 01880 USA (617) 354-7557 www.optikos.com e-mail [email protected] July 16, 1999 © Optikos Corporation, 1999 All Rights Reserved Rev. 2.0 #4-04-001 1 2 Introduction With the growing role played by optical devices in measurement, communication, and photonics, there is a clear need for characterizing optical components. A basic and useful parameter, especially for imaging systems, is the Modulation Transfer Function, or MTF. Over the past few decades new instruments, including the laser interferometer, the CCD Camera, and the Computer have revolutionized the measurement and calculation of the MTF. This has made what was once a tedious and involved process into virtually an instantaneous measurement. This booklet is designed to provide insight into the theory and practice of measuring the Modulation Transfer Function and related quantities. While a booklet of this size cannot begin to address all the intricacies and subtleties of testing, it is intended to provide a foundation for understanding, and to introduce the reader to the fundamentals of testing. Various tests and test techniques are described in detail and in concept. Four articles by Optikos staff have been adapted for this booklet: 1. “Why Measure MTF?” identifies the many reasons for the popularity of MTF as a measured quantity and describes the relationship between MTF measurement and other technologies. 2. “Geometric Lens Measurement” is an article that summarizes the field of geometric lens measurement (non-interferometric measurement), and the recent advances which have brought new attention to traditional testing.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachable Micro-Endoscopy System to Conventional Microscope for Live Mouse Organ Imaging Using 4F Configuration
    Attachable Micro-endoscopy System to Conventional Microscope for Live Mouse Organ Imaging using 4f Configuration Yoon Sung Bae1,2, Jae Young Kim3 and Jun Ki Kim1,2 1Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Science, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea 2University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro, 43-gil, Songpagu, Seoul, Korea 3Research Institute for Skin Imaging, Korea University Medical Center, Guro2-dong, Guro-gu, Seoul, Korea Keywords: Micro-endoscopy, Confocal Endoscope, Confocal Endoscopy, GRIN Lens. Abstract: The Micro-endoscopic technology combined with optical imaging system is essential for minimally invasive optical diagnosis and treatment in small animal disease models. Thus, the high resolution optical probe is required to achieve high resolution imaging. However, the optical imaging system requires highly precise and advanced technologies which are the main reasons for increasing system cost. Advancements in micro-optics and fiber optics technology have paved way in supporting compatibility among optical components. By providing compatibility between endoscopic system and existing conventional imaging equipment such as macro- or micro-scope, we could achieve in not only carrying out the high quality micro-endoscopic image procedure, but also reducing prices of the imaging system. The proposed system could be widely useful in the field of further biological study of animal disease model. 1 INTRODUCTION Karl Stortz, Mauna Kea Technologis and Olympus, the confocal endomicroscopy has higher resolution For the basic biology and preclinical study, the and enables minimum invasive. At the same time, experimental animal study is widely accepted for the confocal fluorescence system allows optical secure confirmation the biological hypothesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Assessment of Compact Optical Systems Towards Special Effects Imaging
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2005 Design And Assessment Of Compact Optical Systems Towards Special Effects Imaging Vesselin Chaoulov University of Central Florida Part of the Electromagnetics and Photonics Commons, and the Optics Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Doctoral Dissertation (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Chaoulov, Vesselin, "Design And Assessment Of Compact Optical Systems Towards Special Effects Imaging" (2005). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 295. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/295 DESIGN AND ASSESSMENT OF COMPACT OPTICAL SYSTEMS TOWARDS SPECIAL EFFECTS IMAGING by VESSELIN IOSSIFOV SHAOULOV B.S. Sofia University, 1994 M.S. Sofia University, 1996 M.S. University of Central Florida, 2003 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the College of Optics and Photonics at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2005 Major Professor: Jannick P. Rolland © 2004 Vesselin I. Shaoulov iii ABSTRACT A main challenge in the field of special effects is to create special effects in real time in a way that the user can preview the effect before taking the actual picture or movie sequence. There are many techniques currently used to create computer-simulated special effects, however current techniques in computer graphics do not provide the option for the creation of real-time texture synthesis.
    [Show full text]