E Ofo - Library I MPO Bibliothequo EX LIBRIS - Ian D

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

E Ofo - Library I MPO Bibliothequo EX LIBRIS - Ian D qH 0 ;;; e oFO - Library I MPO Bibliothequo EX LIBRIS - Ian D. Thomson fl1 t_f <J 1111 llil Ill II m Ill\ 120099451\1 1\1 ~\11 1 1 PERCEPTIONS ON RECREATION AND SPORT FISHERIES OF THE CHILLIWACK/ VEDDER RIVER by Philip A. Meyer Chief Social Science Unit Southern Operations Branch Fisheries & Marine Service JOINTLY FUNDED BY: Southern Operations Branch Fish and Wildlife Branch Fisheries and Marine Service Department of Recreation Environment Canada and Conservation Province of British Columbia SH 572 . BS M48 c . 2 JANUARY, 1976 '273D) THE LIBRARY BEDFORD INSTITUTE OF O CEA O GRAPHY PREFACE B.;X l 006 DARTMO UTH, N.S. B2Y 4A2 This study is the second of two funded jointly by the Fish and Wildlife Branch; Department of Recreation and Conservation , Province of British Columbia , and the Fisheries and Marine Service, Environment Canada , and focussing on recreational management of river systems. Wh i l e the analysis of results , and the writing of the report have fallen to t he .under­ signed, many persons contributed to the final product. Study design was a joint undertaking by Richard C. Bryan and Gerard J. Mos , both then with my unit, Christopher Dodd, of the Province of British Columbia, and the author. Field work was conducted by William Cotter and Victor Willms, under the supervision of Mr. Bryan. Data was arranged for computor analysis by Katherine J. Racey, and Mary C. Harrison. Finally, the study is particu­ larly indebted to Mr. Dodd for forceful and effective criticism during the write-up stage. Despite this substantial assistance t he author, nevertheless, retains claim to any and a ll errors. Philip A. Meyer Chief Social Scienca Unit Southern Operations Branch Fisheries & Marine Service LIBRARY FISllERIES ,\ND OCEANS Hll31.i0Tlll ~ QUE r£c1ms ET oci7:ANS PERCEPTIONS ON RECREATION AND SPORT FISHERIES OF THE CHI LLIWACK/VEDDER RIVER A. Introduction The Ch illiwack/Vedder l ies in the south central area of the Fr aser Valley, flowing i n an approximate westerly direction until it enters the Fraser River southwest of Chilliwack (See Figure I). The river originates in Chilliwack Lake, is 38 miles in length , and drains an area of 468 squ are miles , 164 of which are in the State of Washington . For t h e first 28 miles from Chilliwack Lake to Vedder Crossing , the river is known as the Chilliwack Ri,,er. During the early 1900's, the Chilliwack River was diverted into the Vedder River and this division has since been referred to as the Chi lliwack/Vedder River . The river below Vedder Crossing is known locally as the Vedder ~iver and for the first four miles proceeding downstream it flows on an alluvial fan . For the last five miles it is confined between dykes, and flows across the former flood plain of the Fraser River. The water of the Chilliwack/Vedder system is generally clear, except during heavy rains. The area adjacent to the river is agricultural a nd residential for t he lower h alf of the system. Extensive logging h as taken place over the past 35 years above Vedder Crossing, a nd these op erations, together with forest fires, h ave denuded l a rge areas adjacent to the river . This appears to be the main cause of flash flooding, usually associated with sudden rains . The Chilliwack-Vedder system, together with its tributaries, is a significant producer of salmon, steelhead and trout. Pink salmon appear in large numbers throughout the Fraser System and spawn every second year in the early Fall . The Chilliwack/Vedder system is cons i dered to be the most important p ink salmon producing a r ea on the south side of the Fraser River below Hope. These pink stocks are almost totally associated with catches by the commercial fishery. THE CHILLI WACK- VEDDER RIVER SYSTEM AGASS•I Z SARDIS • CHILLI WACK MUN ICIPALITY Q__ I 2 -3- Coho salmon are found in abundance, and are most available for sport fishing from early October through December. It is estimated that there were approximately 3,200 coho caught by sport fishermen during 1974~!) Steelhead are primarily fished from late November through late March on the Vedder system. An estimated 3,000 were caught by sport fishermen 2 during 1974, ( ) with a similar number reaching the spawning grounds. Trout are a significant sport species in the system, with Dolly Varden, Cutthroat and Rainbow being taken. Sucker and whitefish are also available. Chinook salmon are present in extremely small numbers . The location of the system, on the periphery of a major urban area, makes it highly attractive as a sport fishery and natural recreation area. Bank fishing is the predominant sport fishing mode, and reasonable to easy access is obtained over most of the river area. The river from Slesse Creek to Chilliwack Lake is closed to fishing year round, except for a two-week period in July- August when fishing with lures is permitted . Summary The C~illiwack-Vedder river is an important tributary of the Fraser River in terms of both its agricultural and domestic usage, and its natural recreation capabilities. It is a significant rearing ground for salmon, both commercial and sport, and provides a viable sport fishery on steelhead, and trout as well. Its relative proximity to the metropolitan Vancouver area increases the attractiveness of its three distinct sport fisher;.es: the coho fishery (October through December): the steelh ead fishery ( November through March) and the trout fishery, peaking in July and August. B. Study Method Interviewing took place on a part-time basis from July 1974 through December 1974, and on a full-time basis from January through March, 1975. This was necessary because of financial constraints associated with the study. Consequently, a "proportionately represe_ntati ve" sample from the four recreational user groups surveyed was not obtained. Furthermore, no independent source of total user numbers in the system is available. (1) Conversations with officials of the Provincial Fish and Wildlife Branch, Department of Recreation and Conservation. 2 < ) Developed from Provincial creel census data. -4- This study will therefore discuss the perceptions and preferences of each of the user groups identified, but will not estimate total levels of use or total value for the system. It is also important to note that the "user" groups were not totally distinct. An examination of visits by month will indicate that some recreators interviewed visited the area year-round, and fished for whatever species were available at the time. Consequently, information on weather, for instance, will be to some degree a consequence of the time of year the interview was conducted. The survey focussed on persons found "at bankside". It consequently did not cover kyackers, canoers, innertubers, and other recreators found floating on the river, save where they came ashore, and, so, under­ represents this group. Any large groups of relative unruly recreators were also avoided by interviewers. The surveyed area was covered on a a>ntinuing, rotating basis, with everyone at site over the age of 16 years being interviewed . The first piloting took place in June, 1974. The questionnaire, which was completed by the interviewer, is reproduced in Appendix A. c. The Steelhead Fishermen of the Chilliwack/Vedder 1 Who are the Steelhead Fishermen? Due partially to the sampling configuration of the study, and partially to the popularity of the Chilliwack/Vedder system for steelhead fishing, 475 of the 665 respondents interviewed indicated their fishing motive in being there was to sport fish for steelhead . While slight mention was made of camping and relaxing as secondary motivations, virtually all respondents indicated they were there primarily to fish. Furthermore, 474 respondents (all but one) indicated that they had come specifically to the Chilliwack/Vedder and had not merely "stopped off" as the offshoot of a visit to another area. -5- Ninety-three percent of the steelheaders came from, and were returning to, their homes that same day, while a further 4 per cent were staying in adjacent campgrounds. Only 15 per cent of those inter­ viewed were accompanied by a member of their fami l y. As might be expected , distance also has a marked effect on participation rates on the river. Table I summarizes the place of residence of interviewed respondents. Table I PERMANENT RESIDENCE OF SAMPLED RESPONDENTS CHILLIWACK/VEDDER "STEELHEADER" Per cent Number of of Total Respondents Sample Chilliwack, Cultis, Sardis, Vedder, Yarrow 98 21 Delta, Surrey, Whiterock, Langley, Cloverdale 98 21 Vancouver, North and West Vancouver 91 19 Burnaby, New Westminster 42 9 Matsqui, Sumas, Abbotsford, Aldergrove 35 7 Coquitlam, Port Coquitlam, Port Moody 30 6 Haney, Pitt Meadows 28 6 Mission, Agassiz, Harrison 21 4 Richmond 12 3 Other, British Columbia 10 2 Other, Canadian 3 1 United States 7 1 475 100 The inverse relationship between distance travelled and participation becomes even clearer when the Table I figures are adjusted by popula­ tion size. To facilitate this analysis, the residential areas listed were further arbitrarily grouped into "adjacent areas", " near areas " and "more distant areas". The results of this analysis are presented in Table II. - 6- Table II PARTICIP.ATION IN CHILLIWACK/ VEDDER STEELHEAD FISHERY BY AREA OF RESIDENCE, AND WEIGHTED FOR POPULATION DTFFERENCES Number of Index of Intensity Respondents of P~rticipation per Area capita (1) Adjacent Areas Chilliwack, Cultis, Sardis, Vedder and Yarrow 98 100.0 Near Areas Mission, ~gassiz, Harrison, Hope Masqui, Sumas, Abbotsford, Aldergrove, Delta, Surrey, White Rock, Langley, Cloverdale, Haney, Pitt Meadows, Coquitlam, Port Coquitlam 209 19.1 More Distant Areas Vancouver (including North and West) Richmond, Burnaby, New Westminster, Port Moody 148 6.4 (1) The index of participation is derived by the formula: # of area X participants x (Population of "Adjacent" area (100) # of "adjacent area (Population of Area ) participants :Where X is the area being tested - 7 - Thus, steelheaders, living adjacent to the Chilliwack/Vedder system travel to the river approximately five times as much as those living in "near areas", and 15 times as much as steelheaders living at "more distant" locations in the Lower Mainland.
Recommended publications
  • Salmon and Steelhead Limiting Factors in WRIA 1, the Nooksack Basin, 2002
    SALMON AND STEELHEAD HABITAT LIMITING FACTORS IN WRIA 1, THE NOOKSACK BASIN July, 2002 Carol J. Smith, Ph.D. Washington State Conservation Commission 300 Desmond Drive Lacey, Washington 98503 Acknowledgements This report was developed by the WRIA 1 Technical Advisory Group for Habitat Limiting Factors. This project would not have been possible without their vast expertise and willingness to contribute. The following participants in this project are gratefully thanked and include: Bruce Barbour, DOE Alan Chapman, Lummi Indian Nation Treva Coe, Nooksack Indian Tribe Wendy Cole, Whatcom Conservation District Ned Currence, Nooksack Indian Tribe Gregg Dunphy, Lummi Indian Nation Clare Fogelsong, City of Bellingham John Gillies, U.S.D.A. Darrell Gray, NSEA Brady Green, U.S. Forest Service Dale Griggs, Nooksack Indian Tribe Milton Holter, Lummi Indian Nation Doug Huddle, WDFW Tim Hyatt, Nooksack Indian Tribe Mike MacKay, Lummi Indian Nation Mike Maudlin, Lummi Indian Nation Shannon Moore, NSEA Roger Nichols, U.S. Forest Service Andrew Phay, Whatcom Conservation District Dr. Carol Smith, WA Conservation Commission Steve Seymour, WDFW John Thompson, Whatcom County Tyson Waldo, NWIFC SSHIAP Bob Warinner, WDFW Barry Wenger, DOE Brian Williams, WDFW Stan Zyskowski, National Park Service A special thanks to Ron McFarlane (NWIFC) for digitizing and producing maps, to Andrew Phay (Whatcom Conservation District) for supplying numerous figures, to Llyn Doremus (Nooksack Indian Tribe) for the review, and to Victor Johnson (Lummi Indian Nation) for supplying the slope instability figure. I also extend appreciation to Devin Smith (NWIFC) and Kurt Fresh (WDFW) for compiling and developing the habitat rating standards, and to Ed Manary for writing the “Habitat Limiting Factors Background”.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Control and Sediment Transport Study of The
    FLOOD CONTROL AND SEDIMENT TRANSPORT STUDY OF THE VEDDER RIVER by DAVID GEORGE McLEAN .A.Sc., University of British Columbia, 1975 \ THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF APPLIED SCIENCE in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES The Department of Civil Engineering We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA April, 1980 (5) David George McLean In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of Cim / moo^i^y The University of British Columbia 2075 Wesbrook Place Vancouver, Canada V6T 1W5 E-6 BP 75-51 1 E ABSTRACT The Chilliwack River flows through the Cascade Mountains until reaching a narrow gorge near Vedder Crossing where it flows onto the Fraser Lowlands and eventually meets the Fraser River. Below Vedder Crossing, the river is actively building an alluvial fan by depos• iting its sediment load of gravel and sand. This deposi• tion has resulted in frequent channel shifts over the fan surface with the most recent migration occurring around 1894 when the river shifted down Vedder Creek. Over the last century the Vedder River has been undergoing very complex changes in response to changes in the incidence of severe floods, changes in sediment supply and interference from river training.
    [Show full text]
  • The Persistence of Oxbow Lakes As Aquatic Habitats: an Assessment of Rates of Change and Patterns of Alluviation
    The Persistence of Oxbow Lakes as Aquatic Habitats: an Assessment of Rates of Change and Patterns of Alluviation Pauline L. Dieras 2013 Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy Declaration This work has not been submitted in substance for any other degree or award at this or any other university or place of learning, nor is being submitted concurrently in candidature for any degree or other award. Signed Pauline Dieras Date: 05/03/2013 This thesis is being submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PhD Signed Pauline Dieras Date: 05/03/2013 This thesis is the result of my own independent work/investigation, except where otherwise stated. Other sources are acknowledged by explicit references. The views expressed are my own. Signed Pauline Dieras Date: 05/03/2013 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed Pauline Dieras Date: 05/03/2013 i Abstract Oxbow lakes are of high ecological importance due to the number and the diversity of habitats they provide. They are created after the abandonment of meanders and subsequent sediment infilling leads to their progressive terrestrialisation, taking from a few months up to several centuries. Nonetheless, little is known about oxbow lake terrestrialisation processes, sediment composition, or why such a disparity exists in lakes’ longevity. To understand the controls on oxbow lakes alluviation, field observations, remotely sensed data and GIS analyses were combined. Sediment transfers in oxbow lakes were documented by topographic and sampling surveys of sites in France and Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • REGION 2 - Lower Mainland
    REGION 2 - Lower Mainland CONTACT INFORMATION Fish and Wildlife Regional Office Salmon Information: (604) 586-4400 200-10428 153 St Fisheries and Oceans Canada Surrey BC V3R 1E1 District Offices (DFO) Conservation Officer Service Chilliwack: (604) 824-3300 Please call 1-877-952-7277 for recorded Delta: (604) 666-8266 information or to make an appointment at Langley: (604) 607-4150 any of the following Field Offices: Mission: (604) 814-1055 Mission, North Vancouver, Powell River, Squamish: (604) 892-3230 Sechelt, and Squamish Steveston: (604) 664-9250 Vancouver: (604) 666-0384 RAPP Shellfish Information line: (604) 666-2828 Report All Poachers Rand Polluters Mahood L i C in hilco Conservation Officerl 24 Hour Hotline tin k na STAY UP TO DATE: li R R 1-877-952-RAPPK (7277) iver ko Canim il Check website for in-season changes or h L Please refer to page 78 for more informationC closure dates for the 2021-2023 season rapp.bc.ca g at: www.gov.bc.ca/FishingRegulations r T o Cr a D C s y e 100 Mile House 5-6 e Tatlayoko k l o s o Lake M R r C 5-5 r 5-3 C CHILKO ig B Bonaparte n LAKE r L u R R h Taseko C te o ar hk Lakes ap at 5-4 3-31 on m FR B R Ho A S Y E a R n a R la k m o d m a R e Bish rd 3-32 D op o 2-15 L R R So Carpenter uthg ate ge Lake R Brid Gold ive Cache Creek Kamloops r Bridge R Lake 1-15 2-14 Seton BUTE L INLET 3-33 Anderson Lillooet 3-17 KAMLOOPS Phillips 2-13 L G R u i a R N Arm b r c o I O T C V h L h S o ILL s E OO o R P n E T o M y a O C C H r 2-11 3-16 T Sonora N TOBA ic Island R o INLET Pemberton la n E i e R l n a t e
    [Show full text]
  • Nooksack River Overflow Flood Mitigation Plan
    COUNCIL REPORT Executive Committee Report No. ENG 050-2020 Date: December 09, 2020 File No: 5225-03/Nooksack To: Mayor and Council From: Stella Chiu, Senior Engineer, Drainage and Wastewater Subject: Nooksack River Overflow Flood Mitigation Plan RECOMMENDATION THAT staff continue to work with the Province to encourage the United States to complete the cost-benefit analysis and fulfill the purpose and mandate of the International Task Force. REPORT CONCURRENCE General Manager City Manager The General Manager concurs with the The City Manager concurs with the recommendation of this report. recommendation of this report. SUMMARY OF THE ISSUE Major flooding of West Sumas Prairie and the Washington State cities of Everson, Sumas and the unincorporated areas of Whatcom, occurred in November 1990 when the overflow from the Nooksack River flooded into the Sumas River basin. The Nooksack River Overflow Flood Mitigation Plan (“Study”) is one of the next steps to address the international and transboundary issue from the United States (“US”) into Canada. The work was recently completed with funding from the National Disaster Mitigation Program; the Province supported the work in a technical advising role. This report provides a high-level summary of the findings and recommends next steps. BACKGROUND Major flooding of West Sumas Prairie and the Washington State cities of Everson, Sumas and the unincorporated areas of Whatcom, occurred in November 1990 when the overflow from the Nooksack River flooded into the Sumas River basin. A Nooksack River International Task Force (NRITF) was established in response to the flooding. The Task Force comprises members from both Canada and the US.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of the November 1990 and November 1995 Floods Along the Main Stem Nooksack River, Whatcom County, Washington Ryan T
    Western Washington University Western CEDAR WWU Graduate School Collection WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship Winter 1997 A Comparison of the November 1990 and November 1995 Floods along the Main Stem Nooksack River, Whatcom County, Washington Ryan T. (Ryan Travis) Houser Western Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Houser, Ryan T. (Ryan Travis), "A Comparison of the November 1990 and November 1995 Floods along the Main Stem Nooksack River, Whatcom County, Washington" (1997). WWU Graduate School Collection. 828. https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet/828 This Masters Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in WWU Graduate School Collection by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WWU LIBRARIES A Comparison of the N ovember 1990 and N ovember 1995 Floods^ along the main stem N ooksack R iver, Whatcom County, Washington. by Ryan T. Houser Accepted in Partial Completion of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Dr. Moheb A. Ghali, Dean of Graduate School ADVISORY COMMITTEE Master’s Thf.sts In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master’s degree at Western Washington University, I agree that the Library shall make its copies freely available for inspection. I further agree that extensive copying of this thesis is allowable
    [Show full text]
  • Channel Dynamics and Habitat Development in a Meandering, Gravel Bed River L
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, VOL. 47, W04513, doi:10.1029/2009WR008926, 2011 Channel dynamics and habitat development in a meandering, gravel bed river L. R. Harrison,1 C. J. Legleiter,2 M. A. Wydzga,3 and T. Dunne4 Received 20 November 2009; revised 1 February 2011; accepted 11 February 2011; published 19 April 2011. [1] We investigated how channel morphology, flow complexity, and habitat characteristics in a meandering gravel bed river evolved over time from a simple, reconfigured initial condition. Using a time series of topographic data, we measured rates of channel migration and morphologic change, documented patterns of sediment storage, and estimated rates of sediment supply. We constructed, calibrated, and validated hydrodynamic models to quantify how the evolving morphology influenced hydraulic conditions, flow complexity, and habitat suitability for Chinook salmon spawning and rearing. For a series of meander bends with constant curvature, similar bank materials, and an identical flow history, sediment supply and bar storage directly influenced channel migration rates. Habitat modeling indicated that the availability of Chinook salmon spawning habitat increased over time, whereas the majority of the reach continues to provide only low‐ to medium‐quality rearing habitat for juvenile salmonids, primarily because of a lack of low‐velocity refuge zones. However, other metrics of flow complexity indicate that areas of favorable flow conditions gradually expanded as point bars developed along the inner bank of each bend. These results indicate that although sediment supply can stimulate channel change and diversify river morphology, which acts to promote flow complexity and provide spawning habitat, these sediment‐driven morphological changes might not create bioenergetically favorable habitat for juvenile salmonids.
    [Show full text]
  • Sumas Dyke Trails
    81 SUMAS DYKE TRAILS ABBOTSFORD Hardpacked dyke trail 13km one way • 26km return letsgobiking.net There are many flat and scenic trails to explore on the dykes around the Sumas Prairie. What was once a large lake, drained • Enjoyed this map? Explore more in the new guidebook! in the 1920s, the Sumas Prairie is now home to dairy farms and berry fields. You’ll see views of Taggart Peak, Vedder Mountain and the Cheam Mountain Range. This easy ride links VEDDER NORTH DYKE TRAIL L I A McKay Creek Trail, Sumas River Trail, Barrowtown and Vedder R T VEDDER RIVER TRAIL E River Trail, all part of The Great Trail, and there are options to K Y 5 continue on nearby dykes. 4 D BARROWTOWN PUMP STATION D R L E SUMAS RIVER TRAIL • 7km one way • 14km return L VEDDER CANAL L A 82 Vedder R A River Trails P N START at Eldridge & Atkinson Rd - Abbotsford 3 1 EAST McKay Creek trail then Sumas River Trail KEITH 2 Cross No. 3 Rd, *visit McDonald Park WILSON BRIDGE 3 EAST on dyke to trail end, at North Parallel Rd return via same route or continue: HWY 1 BARROWTOWN - VEDDER RIVER E K 6km one way • 12km return 2 DY MCDONALD NO 3 RD PARK 4 LEFT/E N. Parallel Rd - 1 km on road, just past Barrowtown Pump station go EAST 0 1 2 on dyke trail ER RIV AS 5 M IL km RIGHT/S Vedder River Trail, U RA T S T N GT at Keith Wilson bridge U T O ER M IV E R return via same route S K A A M L U S SUMAS IL A PRAIRIE R T K E E HWY 1 R C (FORMER SUMAS LAKE) Y A LEGEND K C M 80 Discovery Trail 1 Start ATKINSON Connecting Route E D G Ride Direction ELDRI Parking Washrooms TGT - The Great Trail ABBOTSFORD Sumas Dyke 14km Dykes 12km Sumas Trail 1.5km Former Lake CAMPBELL DISCLAIMER: This map is a route aid, not to scale, does not show all roads and trails.
    [Show full text]
  • Slesse Park Clay Slide Stabilization Project
    Chilliwack River Valley SLESSE PARK CLAY SLIDE STABILIZATION PROJECT Final As-Built Report Prepared for: Chilliwack River Action Committee 48665 Chilliwack Lake Road Chilliwack, B.C. V4Z 1A6 Prepared by: CEJ Mussel1 Enterprises Inc P.O. Box 45 1 Chilliwack, B.C. V2P 657 April, 2000 TABLE OF' CONTENTS 1.0 Objectives 2.0 Project Organization 2.1 Proponent 2.2 Funding Partners 2.3 Watershed 2.4 Locations 2.5 Administration 3.0 Partnerships, Donations and In-Kind Contributions 4.0 Background 5.0 Plan 6.0 STAGE I Preparation of Engineered Drawings 6.1 Report Summary 6.2 Cost Overview 6.3 Stage 1 Photograph 7.0 STAGE 2 Upgrading the Slesse Park Clay Slide Berm 7.1 Work Summary 7.2 Cost Overview 7.3 Berm Plan View 7.4 Berm Cross Section 7.5 Stage 2 Photographs 8.0 STAGE 3 Bioengineering 8.1 Work Summary 8.2 Cost Overview 8.3 Stage 3 Map 8.4 Stage 3 Photographs 9.0 Summary of Contributions 10.0 Evaluation 10.1 Steelhead Angler Survey Summary 10.2 Comments and Modifications 10.3 Sumnary of Results 11.0 Acknowledgements 12.0 Review of Literature and Reports 12.1 Studies of Reports pertaining to the Slesse Park Clay Slide 12.2 Other Pertinent Reports and Literature Chilliwack River Valley SLESSE PARK CLAY SLIDE STABILIZATION 1.0 Objectives To do stabilization work on the Slesse Park Clay Slide -to reduce siltation of the downstream ChilliwackNedder River -to reduce degradation of fish spawning and rearing habitat -to improve sports fishing opportunity -to reduce hazards from the clay slide slumps 2.0 Project Organization Stage 1 The Preparation of Engneered Working Drawings and Reports Stage 2 Upgrading the Slesse Park Clay Slide Berm Stage 3 Further Stabilization Using Bioengineering Techniques 2.1 Proponent Chilliwack River Action Committee 48665 Chilliwack Lake Road Chilliwack, B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • REGION 2 - Lower Mainland the Management Unit Boundaries Indicated on the Map Below Are Shown Only As a Reference to Help Anglers Locate Waters in the Region
    REGION 2 - Lower Mainland The Management Unit boundaries indiCated on the map below are shown only as a referenCe to help anglers loCate waters in the region. For more preCise Management Unit boundaries, please Consult one of the CommerCial Recreational Atlases available for B.C. FOR SALMON INFORMATION Fisheries and Oceans Canada District Offices (DFO) Chilliwack: (604) 824-3300 Delta: (604) 666-8266 Fish and Wildlife Regional Office R.A.P.P. Langley: (604) 607-4150 (604) 586-4400 Report All Poachers and Polluters Mission: (604) 814-1055 200-10428 153 St Conservation Officer 24 Hour Hotline Squamish (604) 892-3230 Surrey BC V3R 1E1 1-877-952-RAPP (7277) Steveston (604) 664-9250 Cellular Dial #7277 Vancouver (604) 666-0384 Fraser Valley Trout Hatchery Please refer to page 94 for more information Shellfish Information line: (604) 666-2828 (604) 504-4709 www.rapp.bc.ca 34345 Vye Rd Exotic Alert: Atlantic Salmon Abbotsford BC V2S 7P6 Please refer to the salmon section, p. 4 Conservation Officer Service REGION 2 Please call 1-877-952-7277 for reCorded information or to make an appointment at any of the following Field Offices: ChilliwaCk, Maple Ridge, North VanCouver, C r T r a D Powell River, Sechelt, C Surrey and Squamish s y e 5-6 k 100 Mile House e Tatlayoko l o s o Lake r M R C 5-5 5-3 Cr CHILKO ig B Bonaparte n LAKE r L u R R h Taseko C te o ar hk 5-4 Lakes 3-31 ap at on m FR B R Ho A S Y E a R n l a R a k m o d m a 3-32 R e Bish rd D 2-15 op o L R R So Carpenter uthg ate ge Lake R Brid Gold ive Cache Creek Kamloops r 1-15 2-14 Bridge
    [Show full text]
  • Howard Paish & Associates
    ANGLER CATCH AND USE SURVEY OF ROSS RESERVOIR AND THE CANADIAN SKAGIT RIVER, 1985 PREPARED FOR B.C. MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT REGIONAL FISHERIES REPORT NO. LM-102 JANUARY 1986 HOWARD PAISH & ASSOCIATES Natural Resource Planning and Analysis Coquitlam, B.C. Whitehorse, Yukon ANGLER CATCH AND USE SURVEY OF ROSS RESERVOIR AND THE CANADIAN SKAGIT RIVER, 1985 Prepared for i t i sh Col umb i a Ministry o-f Env i ronmen t Prepared by K.J. Scott G.R. Peterson Howard Paish and Associates, Ltd, 1102 Grover Avenue Coqu i 11 am, B.C. V3J 3G1 Regional Fisheries Report No. LM102 January, 1986 i Preface In June 1985. Howard Paish and Associates Ltd. was retained by British Columbia Ministry of Environment to conduct angler catch and use surveys of the Canadian Skagit River and the portion of Ross Reservoir accessed through Canada. Early in the study* funding was provided to Washington Department of Game to conduct a survey similar in objectives and scope on the American portion of the reservoir. At the request of the Ministry of Environment the surveys of Ross Reservoir were combined to maximize consistency of survey methods and data collection. From July 18, 1985, Washington Department of Game worked with Howard Paish and Associates and surveyed the American portion of Ross Reservoir. Surveys on the Canadian Skagit River were conducted by Howard Paish and Associates. Washington Department of Game continued the Ross Reservoir survey from October i to 31, after the consultant surveys terminated on September 30, and provided the results of their October survey for inclusion in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • SALMON and STEELHEAD HABITAT LIMITING FACTORS in WRIA 1, the NOOKSACK BASIN July, 2002
    SALMON AND STEELHEAD HABITAT LIMITING FACTORS IN WRIA 1, THE NOOKSACK BASIN July, 2002 Carol J. Smith, Ph.D. Washington State Conservation Commission 300 Desmond Drive Lacey, Washington 98503 Acknowledgements This report was developed by the WRIA 1 Technical Advisory Group for Habitat Limiting Factors. This project would not have been possible without their vast expertise and willingness to contribute. The following participants in this project are gratefully thanked and include: Bruce Barbour, DOE Alan Chapman, Lummi Indian Nation Treva Coe, Nooksack Indian Tribe Wendy Cole, Whatcom Conservation District Ned Currence, Nooksack Indian Tribe Gregg Dunphy, Lummi Indian Nation Clare Fogelsong, City of Bellingham John Gillies, U.S.D.A. Darrell Gray, NSEA Brady Green, U.S. Forest Service Dale Griggs, Nooksack Indian Tribe Milton Holter, Lummi Indian Nation Doug Huddle, WDFW Tim Hyatt, Nooksack Indian Tribe Mike MacKay, Lummi Indian Nation Mike Maudlin, Lummi Indian Nation Shannon Moore, NSEA Roger Nichols, U.S. Forest Service Andrew Phay, Whatcom Conservation District Dr. Carol Smith, WA Conservation Commission Steve Seymour, WDFW John Thompson, Whatcom County Tyson Waldo, NWIFC SSHIAP Bob Warinner, WDFW Barry Wenger, DOE Brian Williams, WDFW Stan Zyskowski, National Park Service A special thanks to Ron McFarlane (NWIFC) for digitizing and producing maps, to Andrew Phay (Whatcom Conservation District) for supplying numerous figures, to Llyn Doremus (Nooksack Indian Tribe) for the review, and to Victor Johnson (Lummi Indian Nation) for supplying the slope instability figure. I also extend appreciation to Devin Smith (NWIFC) and Kurt Fresh (WDFW) for compiling and developing the habitat rating standards, and to Ed Manary for writing the “Habitat Limiting Factors Background”.
    [Show full text]