Georgia's Container Market and the Black Sea Region

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Georgia's Container Market and the Black Sea Region Economic Alternatives, 2019, Issue 1, pp. 106-116 Georgia’s Container Market and The Black Sea Region Irakli Danelia*1 Introduction ince the end of the Cold War, the Summary SBlack Sea region has no longer been Due to the strategically important a static border between the West and the geographical location, the Black Sea region East. The region’s geostrategic location, has a key transit function throughout between proximity to the Eurasian energy corridor, Europe and Asia. Georgia, which is a part of as well as the transformation process to Black Sea region, has a vital transit function democracy and good governance are some for the Caucasus Region, as well as for whole of the factors that make the region a priority New Silk Road area, but still there is no for international actors. The collapse of the evidence as to what kind of positioning Georgia Soviet Union drastically increased the number has in The Black sea container market. Given of independent players in place and gave that the country harbours the ambition to be rise to new political, economic, and social a transit hub for containerized cargo flows forces to the region. The Black Sea basin is between the West and the East and is actively a strategically important area that serves as involved in the process of formation One Belt a pivotal East-West and North-South corridor One Road, it is very important to identify the and a crossroads of geopolitics, economics, current circumstances and future potential. energy and culture. It is a very dynamic region Hence the purpose of the study is to identify that presents various challenges and offers the existent container market, investigate many opportunities at once. The Black Sea competitiveness in the market and define container market is represented by Ukraine, Georgia’s positioning in the region. Based on Romania, Russia (Black Sea part), Bulgaria the practical and theoretical significance of and Georgia. Since Georgia’s transit potential the research, this paper provides systemic, is interconnected with the geopolitical and historical and logical generalization methods geo-economic functions at the regional and of research in the performance of the work, international levels, all possible economic and scientific abstraction. Furthermore, analysis political risks, challenges and opportunities and synthesis methods are also applied. should be profoundly analyzed (Danelia, 2016). Keywords: transit corridor; cargo flow; Georgia has the ambition to become a transit container market; Georgia; Black Sea Region. hub not only for the Caucasus region but also JEL code: N70 for whole West and East cargo flows coming * PhD Candidate, Faculty of Economics and Business at Ivane from China going to the Western European Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University. counties, but the country’s positioning among 106 Economic Alternatives, Issue 1, 2019 Articles the rest of the member states along the the characterize the spatial dynamics of container Black Sea container market is has not yet ports of the Black Sea multi-port gateway been given the due attention on the part of regions by testing the validity of established researchers. spatial models on port system development. In addition, the future evolution path for port Literature Review hierarchy in the Black Sea basin has been The Black Sea region accounts for only discussed. 2.5% of global seaborne trade, while the share According to Ederer and Sieber of the North Sea region accounts for about (Ederer&Sieber, 2018), the Black Sea 17%. However, the Black Sea is an important Region is acknowledged as a heterogeneous area of development due to its geographical economic area that emerged from the size and resource base. The Black Sea USSR and has been isolated from Western container port system is among the world’s European Economic Cooperation. The fastest growing markets for cargo flows. aspects of economic development of Black Container market research has become sea region’s member countries in terms of a popular topic of academic research regional economic cooperation have been worldwide. Hence, a huge amount of papers duly outlined. have been published, focusing on different The transport of containerized goods has aspects of containerized cargo flows in the dramatically reduced transport costs, mainly region for comprehensive reviews. Only a few as a result of faster loading and unloading. pieces of research have been published so The aim of the research carried out by far on the Black Sea Basin Container market Anghel and Ciobanu (Anghel &Ciobanu, 2018) in Georgia. This article makes an overview of is to present the evolution of the transport interesting opinions of different authors. In the of containerized goods through the port literature review, article (Papachashvili et al., Constanta in the period between 2009 and 2018) has been highlighted with Table 2. GDP 2017 and to make a comparative analysis for Growth – Data and Forecast, where based the containerized trade through some of the on Gravity Model (case of Georgia), distance most important countries which have ports and GDP are defined as the key factors for on the Black Sea, the Adriatic Sea, the Baltic development of trade between geographically Sea, the Mediterranean Sea, the Aegean close countries, if other essential factors are Sea, the Norwegian Sea and the North Sea. not a hindrance. This circumstance is the The period analyzed is between 2010 and reason to study the transit potential of the 2016. The methodology used consists in data Black Sea countries and develop practical processing and graphic representation of the recommendations. comparative analysis of the results. The concept of "multi-port gateway Reduction of transaction cost is crucial region" has been introduced by the other issue in the discussions regarding logistics. It authors (Grushevska &Notteboom, 2014) is noteworthy that the global changes caused and has been applied to important seaport by the information revolution as a means of markets across Europe and Asia. However, activating trade and economic relations and the dynamics and port development patterns the emergence of new challenges in the in secondary multi-port gateway regions, such market of containerized transportation, also, in as the Black Sea region, have received far terms of emergence of new opportunities for less attention in academic literature. Authors regulating traffic movement (Papachashvili, 107 Articles Georgia’s Container Market and The Black Sea Region 2018). More possibilities are made for (Bulgaria, Romania, Ukraine, Russia, Georgia, institutional compatibility, which affects trade- Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey), cultures economic relationships between partner and ethnic groups. For about a decade after countries (Jamagidze, 2018). 1989, the Black Sea area largely remained Kuo and Kommenda, in their article "What outside the reforms and integration agenda of is China’s Belt and Road Initiative?" (Kuo & the European project. Today, the Black Sea Kommenda, 2018) explanes in very acurate region is reemerging from the periphery and way the meaning and purpous of OBOR, establishing itself as a an integral part of the identifies China’s geoeconomic strategy in project. Owing to the dynamic expansion of corelation of involved countries interest. demand, the countries in the region offer a Besides above mentioned Astrov and considerable market potential for EU, China, Havlik (Astrov&Havlik, 2008) present current and for the United States as well. setbecks in economy and social conditions in The Black Sea area can be described as a each and every Black Sea regional Countries heterogeneous economic area. The economies by offering analyses of macroeconomic differ in several aspects and, with the exception circusmtances. of Turkey, they all emerged from the USSR In the article "Main Determinants of and went through a lengthy and profound Georgia‘s Transit Function Development", transformation process, which is largely ongoing. author (Danelia, 2017) needs to be mentioned The initial situation in the 1990s differed widely, in terms of identification of major factors particularly in terms of the decline in industrial impacting on Georgia’s transit role. There is production and the per capita income given analysis of Logistic Performance Index after independence (Ederer&Sieber, 2011). offered by The World Bank and its influance Recently, however, the region has enjoyed a on Georgia’s containerized cargo flows. fairly rapid economic recovery, accompanied Among the visions given in the by welcome structural changes, although the proceedings to improve the quality of policy labor market situation and social conditions analyses on cross-border development are still generally fairly difficult (Astrov&Havlik, issues, encourage academic discourse within 2008). the Black Sea Region and reinvigorate cross The macroeconomic conditions for the border cooperation in Black Sea region Black Sea countries are mostly positive, (Kakachia (ed), 2012), it is worth to underline with prospects for the annual GDP growth offered interesting options of possibility to to go beyond 5% in the medium and have common border crossing policy and long run. Apart from sound economic regulations system to facilitate regional trade policies, institutional reforms and the development and increase containerized related improvements of the investment cargo flows. climate have been encouraged, which is The Black Sea Container Market a crucial factor for sustainable economic development. Overview The Black sea container market is Located at the crossroads between represented by Ukraine, Romania, Russia Europe and Asia, Russia and the Middle East, (Black Sea part), Bulgaria and Georgia. The the Black Sea Region is not only an area of Black Sea region accounts for only 2.5% of geostrategic and geopolitical importance. The global seaborne trade, while the share of the region also encompasses different nations North Sea region accounts for about 17%. 108 Economic Alternatives, Issue 1, 2019 Articles However, the Black Sea is an important area The growth of container throughput was of development due to its geographical size shown by all countries of the Black Sea region and resource base.
Recommended publications
  • Ports Rail 3
    68693 Public Disclosure Authorized Caucasus Transport Corridor for Oil and Oil Products Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Prepared by: ECSSD The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized December 2008 Abbreviations and Acronyms ACG Azeri, Chirag and deepwater Gunashli (oil fields) ADDY Azerbaijan Railway AIOC Azerbaijan International Oil Consortium bpd Barrels per day BTC Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (pipeline) CA or CAR Central Asian Region Caspar Azerbaijan State Caspian Shipping Company CIS Commonwealth of Independent States CNPC China National Petroleum Corporation CPC Caspian Pipeline Consortium (pipeline) dwt Deadweight ton FOB Free on board FSU Former Soviet Union GDP Gross Domestic Product GR Georgian Railway km Kilometer KCTS Kazakhstan Caspian Transport System KMG KazMunaiGaz KMTP Kazmortransflot kV Kilovolt MEP Middle East Petroleum MOU Memorandum of Understanding OECD Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development RTC Rail tank-car RZD Russian Railway SOCAR State Oil Company of Azerbaijan tpa Tons per annum (per year), metric TRACECA Transport Corridor Europe-Caucasus-Asia Vice President, Europe and Central Asia: Shigeo Katsu, ECAVP Country Director: Donna Dowsett-Coirolo, ECCU3 Sector Director: Peter D. Thomson, ECSSD Sector Manager, Transport: Motoo Konishi, ECSSD Task Team Leader: Martha Lawrence, ECSSD I II Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. CASPIAN OIL TRANSPORT MARKET DYNAMICS Outlook for Caspian Oil Production Transport Options for Caspian Oil 2. CAUCASUS RAIL CORRIDOR—PHYSICAL CONSTRAINTS Ports
    [Show full text]
  • Company Overview 2013 Company Overview 2013 2 /12
    A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S Company overview 2013 Company overview 2013 2 /12 Associated companies Company Country of Owned Company Country of Owned incorporation share incorporation share Abidjan Terminal SA Ivory Coast 40% Meridian Port Holdings Ltd. Great Britain 50% Brigantine International Holdings Ltd. Hong Kong 30% Meridian Port Services Ltd. Ghana 35% Brigantine Services (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. China 30% Neuss Trimodal GmbH Germany 25% Brigantine Services (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. China 30% New Asia Capital Resources Ltd. Hong Kong 33% Brigantine Services Ltd. Hong Kong 30% Pacoci SA Ivory Coast 50% Cape Fruit Coolers Pty. Ltd. South Africa 20% Port Services Containers Company Ltd. Saudi Arabia 48% Channel Energy (Poti) Limited Georgia LLC Georgia 25% Portmade Customs NV Belgium 49% Commonwealth Steamship Insurance Portmade NV Belgium 49% Company Pty. Ltd. Australia 7% PT Bonapelangi Devindo Indonesia 19% Congo Terminal Holding SAS France 30% Qingdao Qianwan United Container Congo Terminal S.A. DR Congo 23% Terminal Co. Ltd. China 8% Cosco Ports (Nansha) Ltd. British Virgin Salalah Port Services Company SAOG Oman 30% Islands 34% Shanghai Brigantine De Well Container Dalian Jilong Brigantine Container Services Co. Ltd. China 15% Services Co. Ltd. China 15% Shenzhen Yantian Tugboat Company Ltd. China 10% Danske Bank A/S Denmark 20% Shipet Maritime Sdn. Bhd. Malaysia 44% Desmi Ocean Guard A/S Denmark 40% Smart Brigantine Container Services Co. Ltd. China 40% Guangzhou South China Oceangate Societe De Participations Portuaires SAS France 40% Container Terminal Co. Ltd. China 20% South Asia Gateway Pvt. Ltd. Sri Lanka 33% Guayanilla Towage Group Inc. Puerto Rico 25% Thetis BV The Netherlands 10% Gujarat Pipavav Port Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Sea Container Market and Georgia's Positioning
    European Scientific Journal November 2018 edition Vol.14, No.31 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 Black Sea Container Market and Georgia’s Positioning Irakli Danelia, (PhD student) Tbilisi State University, Georgia Doi:10.19044/esj.2018.v14n31p100 URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.19044/esj.2018.v14n31p100 Abstract Due to the strategically important geographical location, Black Sea region has a key transit function throughout between Europe and Asia. Georgia, which is a part of Black sea area, has a vital transit function for Caucasus Region, as well as for whole New Silk Road area. Nevertheless, still there is no evidence what kind of role and place Georgia has in The Black Sea container market. As the country has ambition to be transit hub for containerizes cargo flows between west and east and is actively involved in the process of formation “One Belt One Road” project, it is very important to identify Country’s current circumstances, capacities and future potential. Because of this, the purpose of the study is to investigate cargo flows and opportunities of the Black Sea container market, level of competitiveness in the area and define Georgia’s positioning in the regional Container market. Keywords: Geostrategic Location, New Silk Road, Transit Corridor, Cargo flow, Container market, Georgia, Black Sea Methodology Based on practical and theoretical significance of the research the following paper provides systemic, historical and logical generalization methods of research in the performance of the work, scientific abstraction, analysis and synthesis methods are also used. Introduction Since the end of the Cold War, the Black Sea region has no longer been a static border between the West and the East.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment Report: Georgia, Port of Poti
    Environmental Assessment Report Environmental Audit Report September 2009 Prepared by Scientific Research Firm Gamma for Poti Sea Port Corporation This report has been submitted to ADB by Poti Sea Port Corporation and is made publicly available in accordance with ADB’s public communications policy (2005). It does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB. Poti Sea Port Corporation Environmental Audit Report for Current Operations of Poti Sea Port Executed by: Scientific Research Firm Gamma President Vakhtang Gvakharia Tbilisi-Poti 2009 9 M. Alexidze st, 0193, Tbilisi, Georgia tel: +(995 32) 330 274, 330 374 tel/fax +(995 32) 333 268 e-mail: [email protected] SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH FIRM GAMMA Environmental Audit, Poti Sea Port Corp. Page 2 of 38 Content 1 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................................3 2 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF POTI SEA PORT OPERATIONS ........................................................................4 2.1 ABOUT POTI SEA PORT .............................................................................................................................4 2.2 PORT’S EXTENSIVE DEVELOPMENT............................................................................................................7 3 DESCRIPTION OF PORT’S TECHNOLOGICAL PROCESSES .....................................................................7 3.1 TECHNOLOGICAL SCHEME AND CAPACITY OF OIL PRODUCT HANDLING ..................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • GEORGIA (Acting Through the Ministry of Finance of Georgia) U.S.$500,000,000 2.750% Notes Due 2026 ISSUE PRICE: 99.422%
    GEORGIA (acting through the Ministry of Finance of Georgia) U.S.$500,000,000 2.750% Notes due 2026 ISSUE PRICE: 99.422% The U.S.$500,000,000 2.750% Notes due 2026 (the "Notes") to be issued by Georgia, acting through the Ministry of Finance of Georgia (the "Issuer" or "Georgia"), will mature on 22 April 2026 (the "Maturity Date") and, unless previously purchased and cancelled, will be redeemed at their principal amount on that date. The Notes will bear interest from, and including, 22 April 2021 at the rate of 2.750% per annum payable semi-annually in arear on 22 April and 22 October in each year, commencing on 22 October 2021. This Offering Circular comprises neither a prospectus for the purposes of Part VI of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (as amended) (the "FSMA"), a prospectus for the purposes of Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 as it forms part of domestic law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (the "UK Prospectus Regulation"), nor listing particulars given in compliance with the listing rules made under Part VI of the FSMA by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (the "FCA") pursuant to the FSMA. Application has been made for the Notes to be admitted to the official list of the FCA (the "Official List") and to trading on the main market (the "Market") of the London Stock Exchange plc (the "London Stock Exchange"). The Notes are being offered (i) in offshore transactions in reliance on, and as defined in, Regulation S (the "Regulation S Notes") under the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Finland
    SWEDEN GEORGIA FINLAND NORWAY ST PETERSBURG YEKATERINBURG KRASNOYARSK ESTONIA CHELYABINSK GATEWAY TO THE CAUCASUS AND CENTRAL ASIANOVOSIBIRKSK RIGA LATVIA MOSKOW DENMARK KLAIPEDA LITHUANIA RUSSIA SAMARA BELARUS KOSTANAY ASTANA IRELAND HAMBURG UNITED AMSTERDAM KINGDOM NETHERLAND POLAND ROTHERDAM KARAGANDY GERMANY AKTOBE ANTWERP BELGIUM UKRAINE LUXEMBOURG LE HAVRE CZECH REPUBLIC SLOVAKIA ATYRAU KAZAKHSTAN NANTES MOLDOVA AUSTRIA ODESSA AZOV HUNGARY KYZYLORDA DOSTYK FRANCE SWITZERLAND ROMANIA AZOV SEA DRUZHBA SLOVENIA ILLICHIVS'K RIJEKA CROATIA RAVENNA BUCURESTI GENOA ALMATY BOSNIA URUMGI AND MARSEILLE HERZEGOVINA SERBIA CONSTANTA AKTAU UZBEKISTAN LA SPEZIA SHYMKENT BISHKEK BLACK SEA ADRIATIC BULGARIA POTI CASPIAN KYRGYZSTAN ITALY MONTENEGRO VARNA GEORGIA DASOGUZ TOULON SEA SEA BAR BARCELONA LIVORNO ISTANBUL TBILISI TASHKENT MACEDONIA BATUMI LEIXOES SPAIN BAKU DURRES SAMSUN ARMENIA AZERBAIJAN NAPOLI ALBANIA THESSALONIKI GEMLIK PORTUGAL TURKEY TURKMENISTAN TURKMENABAT TAJIKISTAN TYRRHENIAN SEA SALERNO CHINA VALENCIA GREECE TURKMENBASHI DUSHANBE SETUBAL IZMIR PIRAEUS ASHGABAT MARY SINES RADES ANTALYA ALGIERS MERSIN BEJAIA ISKENDERUN TUNISIA MALTA ERBIL SYRIA SFAX CYPRUS CASABLANCA AFGHANISTAN LEBANON IRAN MEDITERRANEAN SEA BEIRUT ALGERIA IRAQ HAIFA PAKISTAN MOROCCO TRIPOLI DAMIETTA ISRAEL ALEXANDRIA ASHDOD SAUDI ARABIA LIBYA JORDAN EGYPT KUWAIT NEPAL QATAR WESTERN SHARAH UNITED ARAB EMIRATES INDIA OMAN PUNE MAURITANIA MALI NIGER CHAD ERITHEA SENEGAL SUDAN YEMEN BURKINA FASO DJIBOUTI GUINEA BENIN LogisticsTOGO ServicesNIGERIA Multimodal Services
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Projects
    REFERENCE PROJECTS Project Locations around the World © HPC Hamburg Port Consulting GmbH On the following pages, you will find a comprehensive list of the projects HPC has conducted ever since our foundation in 1976. 22/07/2021 HPC Hamburg Port Consulting GmbH 1/94 REFERENCE PROJECTS Project Title Client, Location Start Date Construction Supervision for Six Automated Victoria International Container Terminal 2021 Container Carriers in Melbourne, Australia Ltd. PR-3241/336003 Melbourne; Australia Application for Funding of 5G Campus HHLA Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG 2021 Network Hamburg; Germany PR-3240/331014 Simulation Analysis Study for CTA with Fully HHLA Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG 2021 Automated Truck Handover Hamburg; Germany PR-3238/331013 Initial Market Study for a New "Condition EMG Automation GmbH 2021 Monitoring & Predictive Maintenance" Wenden; Germany PR-3239/332005 Business Model Support with Funding Applications for the B- HHLA Hamburger Hafen und Logistik AG 2021 AGV System at Container Terminal Hamburg; Germany PR-3233/331011 Burchardkai HPC Secondment BHP Safe Mooring IPS Aurecon Australasia Pty Ltd 2021 Melbourne; Australia PR-3236/336002 Brazil, Sagres Implementation of OHS Sagres Operacoes Portuarias Ltda 2021 Recommendations Cidade Nova Rio Grande RS; Brazil PR-3234/334002 IT Management Support for a German CHI Deutschland Cargo Handling GmbH 2021 Cargo Handling Company Frankfurt/Main; Germany PR-3235/332004 PANG Study on the Ability of Ports on the Puerto Angamos 2021 Western Coast of Latin America to Handle
    [Show full text]
  • A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S
    A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S Annual Report 2016 Esplanaden 50, DK-1098 Copenhagen K / Registration no. 22756214 A.P. Moller - Maersk — Annual Report 2016 CONTENTS DIRECTORS’ REPORT FINANCIALS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Highlights Consolidated financial Board of Directors 1 statements 2016 Guidance for 2017 Management Board 1 Parent company financial Five year summary statements 2016 Company overview 2 Strategy Statement of the Board of Directors Definition of terms Invested capital and ROIC and the Management Board Company announcements 2016 Financial review of the businesses Independent Auditor’s Report External financial reporting for A.P. Moller - Maersk1 Financial report PAGES 35-104 PAGES 105-115 Q4 2016 financials Risk management Corporate governance Shareholder information PAGES 3-34 The Annual Report for 2016 of A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S (further referred to as A.P. Moller - Maersk as the consolidated group of companies and A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S as the parent company) has been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the EU and further requirements in the Danish Financial Statements Act. Comparative figures Unless otherwise stated, all figures in parenthesis refer to the 1 Part of Directors’ Report corresponding figures for the previous year. 2 Part of Financials 2 / 115 A.P. Moller - Maersk — Annual Report 2016 Contents Directors’ report Highlights / Guidance for 2017 / Five year summary / Strategy / Invested capital and ROIC / Financial review of the businesses / Financial report / Q4 2016 financials Risk management / Corporate governance / Shareholder information / Board of Directors / Management Board / External financial reporting for A.P. Moller - Maersk 3 / 115 A.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Measures Implemented by the Government of Georgia Against
    Measures Implemented by the Government of Georgia Against COVID-19 Report The Government of Georgia 1 Table of Contents Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................... 5 1. The Fight against the Pandemic .................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Stage One – Preventing the Spread of the Virus ..................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Stage Two – Slowing the Spread of the Virus .......................................................................................................... 7 1.3 Stage Three – Managing the Spread of the Virus .................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Stage Four – The Gradual Lifting of Restrictions and Adaptation ......................................................................... 11 1.5 The Assessment of the Healthcare System ........................................................................................................... 15 2. The State of Emergency and the Restrictions ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Multifunctional Transshipment Terminal at Port of Poti, Georgia Updated Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
    TRANSFORD LLC Multifunctional Transshipment Terminal at Port of Poti, Georgia Updated Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Tbilisi 2015 Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 7 2 Updated ESIA ............................................................................................................... 8 3 Environmental and Social Objectives of the Report ..................................................... 10 4 Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Methodology ....................................... 10 5 Legal and Regulatory Framework ................................................................................ 11 5.1 Georgian legislation .............................................................................................. 11 5.2 Environmental Standards in Georgia .................................................................... 15 5.3 Environmental Impact Assessment in Georgia ..................................................... 17 5.4 IFC Performance Standards ................................................................................. 18 5.5 International Conventions ..................................................................................... 19 5.6 Marine sediment quality guidelines ....................................................................... 20 5.7 Gaps between Georgian legislation and IFC requirements ................................... 21 6 Project Description .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Business and Investing in Georgia
    www.pwc.com/ge DOING BUSINESS AND INVESTING IN GEORGIA 2020 Edition A guide covering everything you need to know about doing business in Georgia – from corporate and labour law to finance, regulatory matters and tax. Guide to Doing Business and Investing in Georgia 2020 Edition Doing Business and Investing in Georgia By PricewaterhouseCoopers Georgia LLC This guide has been prepared for the assistance of those interested in doing business in Georgia. It does not cover exhaustively the subjects it treats, but is intended to answer some of the important, broad questions that may arise. When specific problems occur in practice, it will often be necessary to refer to the laws, regulations and legal decisions of the country and to obtain appropriate professional advice. Whilst we have made every attempt to ensure the information contained in this guide is accurate, neither PwC nor the author can accept any responsibility for errors or omissions in the factual content. The material contained in this guide reflects the position as of December 2019. Doing Business and Investing in Georgia 1 2020 Edition Content Office location in Georgia ....................... 4 7 Tax System and Administration ...... 32 1 Georgia Profile ................................... 7 7.1 Tax system ............................................... 32 1.1 Introduction .............................................. 7 7.2 Direct and indirect tax burden ............... 32 1.2 Government structure............................... 7 7.3 Principal taxes ......................................... 32 1.3 Legal system .............................................. 7 7.4 Legislative framework ............................. 32 1.4 People ........................................................ 8 7.5 Tax treaties .............................................. 33 1.5 Economy .................................................... 8 7.6 Administration of the tax system ........... 33 1.6 Foreign trade ............................................ 11 7.7 Registration requirements .....................
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia: Investing for Change FOREWORD
    GeorgiaINVESTING FOR CHANGE Banking on Georgia EBRD lends a hand to financial sector Hydro on-stream Investors flock to renewables sector Stars of Enterprise Private agri companies boost productivity Investing for change Sir Suma Chakrabarti President of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development “Investing for Change” was the theme we chose for our 2015 Annual Meeting in Tbilisi. Investment has been a force for positive change in Georgia, and Georgia has encouraged investors with its successful policies and reforms. Ten years ago we launched our Early Transition Countries Initiative, which enabled us to boost our presence CONTENTS in Georgia. Since then, we have often introduced 04 Our work in Georgia innovative investment instruments 06 Energy here and then applied them in other 10 Financial sector countries in the EBRD regions. 14 Private sector In Georgia, and in all of the countries 20 Small and medium-sized where we invest, we are working towards enterprises a stronger, more sustainable economic 22 Regional integration future by building resilience, promoting 24 Infrastructure 26 Donors and funds integration and addressing global economic challenges. This is the strategy that will dominate our activities over the coming years. READ AND DOWNLOAD THIS BROCHURE www.ebrd.com/what-we-do/sectors- SIR SUMA CHAKRABARTI ON and-topics/georgia-investing-for- INVESTING IN GEORGIA change.html youtu.be/01-8sRIwpH8change.html 2 / Georgia: investing for change FOREWORD On the threshold of tomorrow Bruno Balvanera, EBRD Director for Caucasus, Moldova and Belarus hink Georgia and you think of amazing capita in our countries of operations. We have landscapes, warm and hospitable supported the development of the banking Tpeople, fabulous food and great wine.
    [Show full text]