Kinship and language documentation in

3rd International Conference on Language Documentation & Conservation University of Hawai’i February 28-March 3, 2013

Karma Tshering Australian National University [email protected] Outline

• Introduction to: Bhutan and its languages

• Brief description of • Kinship charts comparing kinship terms in Dzongkha and Chöke

• Conclusion

2

In South Asia Where is Bhutan?

http://worldmap.org/maps/interactive/IN.jpg

http://schmitzky.deviantart.com/art/World-Map-with-Grid-74061087

3

In the Himalayas, south of Tibet & north of north-east India Bhutan

Courtesy of George van Driem

4 Looking towards north

5 At around 4500m

6 At around 2000m

7 Northern & southern:

8 Languages spoken in Bhutan:

Language Number of Speakers Dzongkha 160,000 Chocangaca 20,000 Brokkat 300 Brokpa 5,000 Black Mountain Ole 1,000 Phobjikha 10,000 Khengkha 40,000 Bumthap 30,000 Kurtöp 10,000 Dzala 15,000 Dakpa 1,000 Tshangla 138,000 Lhokpu 2,500 Lepcha 2,000

Gongduk 2,000

van Driem (1998)

9 Dzongkha speaking area

10 Varieties of Dzongkha; dialects of ’Ngalobi-kha:

• Layap: northwestern region in Laya/Lingzhi • Lunap: northeastern region in Lunana • Wang: central region in • Thê, Pünap: central region in • D’agap: southwestern region in D’agana • Chukha: southeastern region in Chukha • Shâ: eastern region in Wangdi • Hâp/Parop: western region in Hâ and Paro, and • Dränjop (in the neighboring state of Sikkim)

11 Although linguists consider Dzongkha a dialect of Tibetan, (e.g. Tournadre 2008).

The distinction between Chöke and Dzongkha is greater than we think: • Phonology or the sound system is different • No systematic one-to-one correspondence between Chöke and Dzongkha • Dzongkha has more sounds than Chöke: devoiced and retroflex stops • Dzongkha has more vowels: nasalization and different vowel lengths • Dzongkha also has tones: high, low, level and falling tonal contours • Tibetan and Dzongkha are not mutually intelligible

12 Kinship Documentation

• Data collected on Dzongkha: – Native speaker intuition – Consultation with native speakers from different regions – Part of large study, examining kinship in Bhutan – In this talk, Dzongkha data are compared with Tibetan data

13 Kinship chart 1:

14 Kinship chart 2:

15 Kinship chart 3:

16 Kinship chart 4:

17 Kinship chart 5:

18 Kinship chart 6:

19 Kinship chart 7:

20 Kinship chart 8:

21 Conclusions • Dzongkha has a rich system of kinship that is similar to Tibetan but different in interesting ways. – Similarities: most forms are cognate – Similarities: almost all categories are shared between Dzongkha and Tibetan – Difference: For example, Tibetan has no ’mâro relationship

• The difference raises an interesting question: is there something about the culture or history of Dzongkha speakers versus Tibetan speakers that helps create this difference? – Dzongkha speakers tend to be matrilineal and matrilocal while Tibetans are patrilineal and patrilocal…

22

Conclusions

• Dzongkha is more than just a “dialect of Tibetan” • Documentation of kinship can reveal important information about the people who speak the language

23 Trashi-Dele!

Thank you!

24 References

• van Driem, George. 1998. Dzongkha. Leiden: Research School CNWS. • _____. 2001. Languages of the Himalayas. Leiden: Brill. • Hyslop, Gwendolyn. 2011. Kurtöp Grammar. PhD Dissertation. Eugene: University of Oregon. • Namgyel, Singye. 2003. The Language Web of Bhutan. Thimphu: KMT Publisher. • Penjore, Dorji 2009. Love, Courtship and Marriage in Rural Bhutan: A preliminary ethnography of Wamling village in Zhemgang. Thimphu: Galing Printers and Publishers. • Tournadre, Nicolas. 2008. The notion of scale in linguistic classification: is ‘Tibetan’ a language or a family of languages? Paper presented at the 14th Himalayan Languages Symposium

25