DOCSLIB.ORG

Opening Brief by Petitioner Murray Energy Corporation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Opening Brief by Petitioner Murray Energy Corporation USCA Case #14-1112 Document #1527224 Filed: 12/15/2014 Page 1 of 87 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED No. 14-1112 & No. 14-1151 No. 14-1112: IN RE MURRAY ENERGY CORPORATION Petitioner. No. 14-1151: MURRAY ENERGY CORPORATION Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and REGINA A. MCCARTHY, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency Respondents. On Petition for Writ of Prohibition & On Petition for Judicial Review OPENING BRIEF OF PETITIONER Geoffrey K. Barnes J. Van Carson Wendlene M. Lavey John D. Lazzaretti Robert D. Cheren SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS (US) LLP 4900 Key Tower 127 Public Square Cleveland, Ohio 44114 (216) 479-8646 [email protected] December 15, 2014 Counsel for Murray Energy Corporation USCA Case #14-1112 Document #1527224 Filed: 12/15/2014 Page 2 of 87 PARTIES, RULINGS, AND RELATED CASES Pursuant to Circuit Rule 28(a)(1), Petitioner states as follows: I. PARTIES, INTERVENORS, AND AMICI Case No. 14-1112 Petitioner: Murray Energy Corporation Intervenor for Petitioner: National Federation of Independent Business Movant-Intervenors for Petitioner: Utility Air Regulatory Group, State of West Virginia, State of Alabama, State of Alaska, State of Indiana, State of Kansas, Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of Louisiana, State of Nebraska, State of Ohio, State of Oklahoma, State of South Dakota, and State of Wyoming Amici Curiae for Petitioner: State of West Virginia, State of Alabama, State of Alaska, Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of Nebraska, State of Ohio, State of Oklahoma, State of South Carolina, and State of Wyoming Respondents: United States Environmental Protection Agency and Gina McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency Movant-Intervenors for Respondent: Environmental Defense Fund, Natural Resources Defense Council, and Sierra Club - i - USCA Case #14-1112 Document #1527224 Filed: 12/15/2014 Page 3 of 87 Amici Curiae for Respondent: State of New York, State of California, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware, State of Maine, State of Maryland, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of New Hampshire, State of New Mexico, State of Oregon, State of Rhode Island, State of Vermont, State of Washington, and District of Columbia Movant-Amici Curiae for Respondent: City of New York, Environmental Defense Fund, Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club, Clean Wisconsin, Michigan Environ- mental Council, and Ohio Environmental Council Case No. 14-1151 Petitioner: Murray Energy Corporation Movant-Intervenors for Petitioner: State of West Virginia, State of Alabama, State of Alaska, State of Indiana, State of Kansas, Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of Louisiana, State of Nebraska, State of Ohio, State of Oklahoma, State of South Dakota, and State of Wyoming Respondents: United States Environmental Protection Agency and Gina McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency - ii - USCA Case #14-1112 Document #1527224 Filed: 12/15/2014 Page 4 of 87 Movant-Intervenors for Respondent: Environmental Defense Fund, Natural Resources Defense Council, and Sierra Club RULINGS UNDER REVIEW The petition for an extraordinary writ, No. 14-1112, seeks a writ prohibiting EPA’s ultra vires rulemaking styled Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units, 79 Fed. Reg. 34,830 (June 18, 2014). The petition for review, No. 14-1151, seeks judicial review of an EPA legal conclusion embodied and announced in the initiation of EPA’s ultra vires rulemaking styled Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units, 79 Fed. Reg. 34,830 (June 18, 2014). RELATED CASES West Virginia v. EPA, No. 14-1146 (petition to review EPA settlement). - iii - USCA Case #14-1112 Document #1527224 Filed: 12/15/2014 Page 5 of 87 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1 and D.C. Circuit Rule 26.1, Petitioner provides the following disclosure: Murray Energy Corporation is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Ohio. No publicly-held corporation holds an ownership interest of 10 percent or more of Murray Energy Corporation. Murray Energy Holdings Co. is Murray Energy Corporation’s parent corporation. Murray Energy Corporation is the largest privately-owned coal company in the United States and the fifth largest coal producer in the country, employing approximately 7,500 workers in the mining, processing, trans- portation, distribution, and sale of coal. In 2014, Murray Energy Corporation expects to produce 65 million tons of coal from twelve active coal mining complexes in six States. Murray Energy Corporation also owns two billion tons of proven or probable coal reserves in the United States. - iv - USCA Case #14-1112 Document #1527224 Filed: 12/15/2014 Page 6 of 87 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................1 ISSUES........................................................................................................2 STATEMENT OF THE CASE....................................................................3 I. In 2012, EPA Promulgated a National Emission Standard for Power Plants under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act. ..........................3 II. EPA Now Seeks to Mandate State-by-State Standards for Existing Power Plants under Section 111(d) of the Act. ........................6 III. Murray Energy Corporation Petitions for Judicial Review and an Extraordinary Writ to Stop EPA’s Unlawful Actions.......................7 JURISDICTION .........................................................................................8 SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 10 STANDING.............................................................................................. 12 ARGUMENT............................................................................................ 15 I. Section 111(d) Prohibits EPA From Mandating State-by-State Emission Standards for Existing Sources That Are Already Subject to a Section 112 National Emission Standard.......................... 15 A. The Clean Air Act Expressly Prohibits Regulating Sources under Both Section 111(d) and Section 112, as EPA Has Repeatedly Conceded. .................................................................... 15 B. Section 111(d) Sensibly Protects Existing Sources From Double Regulation Under Standards that Each Seek to Independently Maximize Emission Reductions. .............................. 19 C. The Act’s Evolution Since 1970 Shows the Import and Purpose of the Section 111(d) Restriction. ....................................... 21 1. The 1970 Clean Air Act Amendments Created a State-by-State Existing Source Standards Program and a Limited National Standards Program Only for Extremely Hazardous Emissions............................................ 21 - v - USCA Case #14-1112 Document #1527224 Filed: 12/15/2014 Page 7 of 87 2. The 1977 Amendments Required States to Maximize Emission Reductions at Existing Sources in Light of Costs. .................................. 23 3. The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments Significantly Expanded the National Standards Program and Retained the State-by-State Existing Source Standards Program Only for Source Categories Not Regulated Under the National Standards Program.............................................. 24 II. EPA Wrongly Ignores the Text of Section 111(d) and Erroneously Claims There Are Dueling “Versions” of the Statute.......................... 29 A. The Code Accurately Reflects the Text of Section 111(d). ................ 29 B. EPA Wrongly Asks this Court to Disregard the Current Text of Section 111(d) as Determined by the Office of Law Revision Counsel.......................................................................................... 34 III. The Relief Sought by the Petitions Is Available Now.......................... 38 A. This Court Can and Should Issue a Writ Prohibiting EPA From Doubly Regulating Power Plants..................................................... 39 1. This Court Can Issue a Writ Prohibiting Ultra Vires Agency Action When It Is Necessary or Appropriate To Do So. ................................... 39 2. A Writ Is Necessary and Appropriate Under these Extraordinary Circumstances. ............................................................................... 41 B. This Court Cand and Should Hold Unlawful and Set Aside EPA’s Erroneous Legal Conclusion that It Can Doubly Regulate Existing Sources Under Sections 111(d) and 112 of the Clean Air Act............ 45 1. EPA Has Concluded that It Has the Authority to Mandate the Double Regulation of Sources under Sections 111(d) and 112.................. 45 2. EPA’s Legal Conclusion Is Final Action under the Clean Air Act. ........... 48 CONCLUSION......................................................................................... 58 - vi - USCA Case #14-1112 Document #1527224 Filed: 12/15/2014 Page 8 of 87 AUTHORITIES CASES Allen v. Wright 468 U.S. 737 (1984) ........................................................................... 13 Am. Elec. Power Co. v. Conn. 131 S.Ct. 2527 (2011)....................................................................17–18 Am. Petroleum Inst. v. SEC 714 F.3d 1329 (D.C. Cir. 2013)........................................................... 33 Amgen, Inc. v. Smith 357 F.3d 103 (D.C. Cir. 2004)............................................................ 14 Appalachian
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BOMA 360 Adds up to and Renewals in the Program: MOST BUILDING DESIGNATIONS OVERALL 1
    PERFORMANCE PROGRAM ® TOP 10 COMPANIES More than 125 owners and manage- ment companies already recognize the value the BOMA 360 designation brings to their buildings. These companies are leading the way with the most building designations BOMA 360 Adds Up to and renewals in the program: MOST BUILDING DESIGNATIONS OVERALL 1. Cushman & Wakefield 2. Piedmont SUCCESS 3. Brookfield 4. CBRE If you only do one thing to improve the performance 5. Cousins Properties of your commercial property, this is it: 6. JBG Smith EARN THE BOMA 360 DESIGNATION. 7. The RMR Group LLC With the BOMA 360 designation, you can single-handedly increase your tenant satisfac- 8. Hines tion scores, boost rental rates, lower vacancy levels and outperform the competition. 9. Oracle America, Inc. BOMA 360 gives buildings an edge—and the numbers back this up. 10. SL Green Realty Corp. Going through the application process for the BOMA 360 Performance program gives property teams an objective, holistic evaluation of how the building is being managed These companies had the most and what could be improved. Even great property teams can find areas of improvement building designations and renewals in everything from tenant outreach to sustainability efforts.. in the past year: Over and over, property professionals at BOMA 360-designated buildings talk about MOST DESIGNATIONS the transformative power of the BOMA 360 program to bring their operations and their IN THE PAST YEAR teams into greater alignment. And this leads to measurable benefits: • BOMA 360-designated buildings average $7.51 more per square foot (psf) in rental 1. Brookfield income and $6.25 psf more in net operating income than buildings without the des- 2.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court Western District of Missouri Central Division
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION MISSOURI COALITION FOR THE ) ENVIRONMENT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case Number: 03-4217-CV-C-NKL ) MICHAEL O. LEAVITT, Administrator ) of the United States Environmental ) Protection Agency, and THE UNITED ) STATES ENVIRONMENTAL ) PROTECTION AGENCY, ) ) Defendants. ) PLAINTIFF’S SUGGESTIONS IN OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION TO INTERVENE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE AGENCIES AND THE URBAN AREAS COALITION Plaintiff Missouri Coalition for the Environment (“MCE”) files this opposition to the motion to intervene of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies and the Urban Areas Coalition (the “Associations”). The Associations move for both intervention as of right and permissive intervention. MCE opposes both grounds of the motion. MCE does not dispute the general requirements for intervention as of right set forth on page four of the Associations’ Suggestions in Support. However, as further explained below, MCE opposes the motion to intervene as of right on the grounds that it was not timely and that it failed to demonstrate that the Associations have a recognized interest that stands to be impaired by the outcome of this litigation. MCE does not dispute the general requirements for permissive intervention set forth on page fourteen of the Associations’ Suggestions in Support, but adds that the timeliness requirement also applies to motions for permissive intervention. MCE opposes the motion for permissive intervention on the grounds that it was untimely and that such intervention would unduly delay and prejudice the adjudication of MCE’s claims. I. The Associations’ Motion Should be Denied on the Ground that it was Untimely.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Status Conference
    IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: ) Chapter 11 PRIMARY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., ) PHS CLEVELAND, INC., ) Case No. 99-615 (MFW) PHS PHYSICIAN MANAGEMENT OF ) PHS MT. SINAI, INC., OHIO, INC., ) (Jointly Administered) PRIMARY HEALTH SYSTEMS OF ) INC., OHIO, L.P., PHS ST. ALEXIS, ) Adv. Case No. (JKF) PHS LAURELWOOD, INC., ) PHS ROXBOROUGH, INC., and ) LOWER BUCKS, INC., ) ) Debtors, ) Adv. Pro. Nos. (01-200 through 01 ) 285)(01-402 through 01-416) (01-418 ) through 01-432) (01-449 through 01-523) (01-684 through 01-694) (01-701 through OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF ) and ) 01-739) (01-740 through 01-743) UNSECURED CREDITORS, ) (01-9994) Plaintiff, ) ) ) V. ) ) ACCENT SERVICE COMPANY ) INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., ) Defendants. ) I NOTICE OF STATUS CONFERENCE of, a status PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, unless settled or otherwise disposed Judith K. conference will be held on September 23, 2002 at 2:00 p.m. before The Honorable 824 N. Market Fitzgerald, at the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, Street, Wilmington, Delaware in the above-captioned adversary proceedings. CVODý, ý--IDS GMOA3DAQ Dated: August 8, 2002 Wilmington, Delaware THE BAYARD FIRM By: Neil B. G sman (No. 2087) Christopher P. Simon (No. 3697) Christopher A. Ward (No. 3877) 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 900 Wilmington, Delaware 19899 Telephone: (302) 655-5000 Facsimile: (302) 658-6395 -and Reginald W. Jackson Tiffany Strelow Cobb VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE LLP 52 East Gay Street P.O. Box 1008 Columbus, Ohio 43216-1008 (614) 464-6400 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2002, I caused a copy of I, Christopher A.
    [Show full text]
  • WILLIAM DOUGLAS ZWEIG, Et Al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI Supreme Court No . SC92581 WILLIAM DOUGLAS ZWEIG, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Respondents/Cross-Appellants, vs. THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Respondent. SUBSTITUTE BRIEF OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CLEAN WATER AGENCIES, THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FLOOD AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AGENCIES, THE AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION AND THE ASSOCIATION OF MISSOURI CLEANWATER AGENCIES AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT-APPELLANT/CROSS-RESPONDENT THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT David W. Burchmore Aimee Davenport Squire, Sanders & Dempsey (US) LLP Lathrop & Gage LLP 4900 Key Tower 314 E. High Street 127 Public Square Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 Cleveland, OH 44114-1304 (573) 893-4336 (216) 479-8500 Matthew A. Jacober Nathan Gardner-Andrews Lathrop & Gage LLP General Counsel 7701 Forsyth Boulevard, Suite 500 National Association Of Clean Clayton, Missouri 63105 Water Agencies (314) 613-2845 1816 Jefferson Place, NW Washington, DC 20036-2505 Attorneys for the Amici Curiae (202) 833-3692 TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages STATEMENT OF INTEREST ........................................................................................... 1 ARGUMENT ....................................................................................................................... 6 I. STORMWATER USER FEES BASED ON IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA ARE THE INDUSTRY NORM AND ARE DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE COST OF SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE STORMWATER
    [Show full text]
  • BOARD of TRUSTEES MEETING Bakerhostetler, Key Tower, 127 Public Square Tuesday, January 21, 2020 5:00 – 6:30 Pm AGENDA 1
    BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING BakerHostetler, Key Tower, 127 Public Square Tuesday, January 21, 2020 5:00 – 6:30 pm AGENDA 1. Chair’s Report, Scott Holbrook A. Approval of the Minutes of the November 19th Meeting page B. Annual Fund Thank you C. Trustee Dashboards being sent now D. Community Luncheon, Thursday, March 26th, with featured speaker, John G. Morikis, CEO of Sherwin Williams Company page E. Tom Einhouse Nomination as an Honorary Life Trustee page 2. Staff & Trustee Introductions page 3. 2019 Year in Review, Kathleen Crowther, President & CRS Staff A. Year End Summary 2019 page B. Staff Presentation on 2019 Activities page 1) Margaret Lann, Manager of Preservation Services 2) Jamie Miles, Preservation Programs Assistant 3) Jessica Beam, Heritage Home ProgramSM Associate 4) Abigail Enicke, Heritage Home ProgramSM Associate 5) Dean Pavlik, Preservation Construction Manager 6) Stephanie Phelps, Marketing & Events Specialist 7) Katie Leskowitz, Development & Marketing Assistant C. Discussion 4. Recent Grant Requests A. 1772 Foundation ($100K – Dall-Mays Houses & Small Deals) 1 B. National Endowment for the Humanities Grant Submitted ($60K - Civil Rights Trail) page C. Cleveland Foundation ($75K – Small Deals) Upcoming Board of Trustees Meetings: Tuesday, March 17, 2020, 5:00 – 6:30 pm; location TBD Tuesday, May 19th, 2020, 5:00 – 6:30 pm; location TBD Annual Meeting, Counts as a Board Meeting – July TBD 2020 “Big Three” Events Thursday, March 26th, Community Luncheon, 11:30 am – 1: 30 pm, The Westin Cleveland Downtown Wednesday, June
    [Show full text]
  • Tallest Buildings in the World, There Are Now Only Six in the United States; the Majority Are Currently in Asia and Were Constructed Within the Last Ten Years
    Skyscraper_001-003.qxd 07.01.2008 8:01 Uhr Seite 1 skyscrapers Skyscraper_001-003.qxd 07.01.2008 8:01 Uhr Seite 2 skyscrapers ANDRES LEPIK PRESTEL Munich · Berlin · London · New York Skyscraper_001-003.qxd 07.01.2008 8:01 Uhr Seite 3 CONTENTS Appendix 156 51 Bank of America Tower, New York 154 50 London Bridge Tower, London 152 49 Freedom Tower, New York 150 48 Burj Dubai, Dubai 148 47 Central Chinese Television Headquarters, Beijing 144 46 Shanghai World Financial Center, Shanghai 142 45 Turning Torso, Malmö 140 44 Torre Agbar, Barcelona 138 43 Taipei Financial Center,Taipei 134 42 Swiss Re Headquarters, London 132 41 Highcliff & The Summit, Hong Kong 130 40 Burj al Arab Hotel, Dubai 128 39 Jin Mao Tower, Shanghai 126 38 Petronas Towers, Kuala Lumpur 124 37 Commerzbank, Frankfurt/Main 120 36 Menara Mesiniaga, Subang Jaya 118 35 New Tokyo City Hall,Tokyo 116 34 Messeturm, Frankfurt/Main 114 33 Bank of China, Hong Kong 110 32 Lipstick Building, New York 108 31 Hongkong and Shanghai Bank, Hong Kong 106 30 Lloyd’s Building, London 104 29 AT&T Headquarters, New York 102 28 National Commercial Bank, Jeddah 100 27 Citicorp Center, New York 98 26 Sears Tower, Chicago 96 25 World Trade Center, New York 94 24 Transamerica Pyramid, San Francisco 92 23 Nakagin Capsule Tower,Tokyo 90 22 John Hancock Center, Chicago 88 21 Lake Point Tower, Chicago 84 20 Australia Square, Sydney 82 19 Economist Building, London 80 18 Marina City, Chicago 78 17 Thyssenhaus, Düsseldorf 76 16 Radisson SAS Royal Hotel, Copenhagen 72 15 Torre Pirelli, Milan 70 14 Seagram
    [Show full text]
  • Tall Buildings in the Global Recession: 2008, 2020 and Beyond
    ctbuh.org/papers Title: Tall Buildings in the Global Recession: 2008, 2020 and Beyond Authors: Philip Oldfield, Research Coordinator, Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat Antony Wood, Executive Director, Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat Subjects: Construction Economics/Financial Social Issues Keywords: Construction Economics Publication Date: 2009 Original Publication: CTBUH Journal, 2009 Issue I Paper Type: 1. Book chapter/Part chapter 2. Journal paper 3. Conference proceeding 4. Unpublished conference paper 5. Magazine article 6. Unpublished © Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat / Philip Oldfield; Antony Wood Tall Buildings in the Global Recession: 2008, 2020 and beyond "Is this the end of the tall ambitions of places such as Moscow, Chicago or Dubai for the short to mid term future?" Philip Oldfield The year 2008 will long be remembered as the start of an economic crisis that has gripped the entire globe – a year that may also have brought to an abrupt end the worldwide construction boom of the past decade that has seen ever-denser cities containing ever-taller buildings proposed from Madrid to the Middle East, from Shanghai to San Francisco. As financial shock waves have reverberated around the world, high-profile tall building projects in virtually all skyscraper cities have been cancelled, delayed, or put on hold in response to the precarious global economic conditions. The question that everyone is now asking – is this the end of the tall ambitions of places such as Moscow, Chicago or Dubai for the short-mid term future? The Antony Wood correlation between tall buildings and economic recession is not a new one.
    [Show full text]
  • 1068025) of CLEVELAND, OH
    KeyCorp Annual Report of Bank Holding Companies FR Y-6 as of December 31, 2019 Table of Contents Report Page Item No. Description No. 1. Annual Report to Shareholders N/A 2a. Organization Chart as of December 31, 2019 3 - 6 2b. Domestic Branch Listing submitted separately via email N/A 3. Securities Holders 7 4. Insiders 8 - 12 2 KeyCorp 0301 34-6542451 KeyCorp Organization Chart as of December 31, 2019 (LEI: RKPI3RZGV1V1FJTH5T61) Report Item 2: All companies are 100% owned unless otherwise indicated. Cleveland, Ohio All reportable LLC investments are managing member interests unless otherwise noted. Incorporated in Ohio Banking Affiliates 0100 34-0797057 KeyBank National Association (c) (LEI: HUX2X73FUCYHUVH1BK78) Cleveland, Ohio National Association 0103 34-6542252 0138 26-1759891 0197 83-2311115 0313 34-1616221 0612 84-1063147 0703 16-1254079 Key Equity PARTREO, LLC (**) Key Opportunity Key Community Key Equipment First Niagara - Capital Corporation - Cleveland, Ohio - Zone Fund I, Inc. - Development Corporation - Finance International Inc. - Realty, Inc. Cleveland, Ohio Incorporated in Ohio Cleveland, Ohio Cleveland, Ohio (LEI: 549300LWEBPTNGB7SP52) Lockport, New York Incorporated in Ohio 0160 31-1498485 Incorporated in Ohio Incorporated in Ohio Superior, Colorado Incorporated in New York 0104 34-1234878 Key Affordable 0251 41-2159012 Incorporated in Colorado KB OREO, LLC (**) - Housing Corp. Capital & Risk 0315 13-4204049 0721 46-3998940 - Cleveland, Ohio Overland Park, Kansas - Consulting Group LLCKey Community Development 0616 14-1818402 First Niagara Incorporated in Ohio Incorporated in Ohio Cleveland, Ohio - New Markets LLC KSP Investments, Inc. Business Trust (f) 0105 34-1614731 0161 31-1523763 Incorporated in Ohio Cleveland, Ohio (PW)(**) - Albany, New York Buffalo, New York SELCO Service KeyCorp Housing 0270 58-2359974 Incorporated in Delaware Incorporated in Maryland - Corporation - Management, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark-To-Market (M2M) Transactions
    Mark-to-Market (M2M) Transactions Last Contract Owner Date Completed Property Id Name Type Total Units Street Address City State Zip Owner Owner Address1 Owner City Owner Zip Owner Phone Last Milestone Descrip Milestone Units State Complete As Date 800005205 Autumn Park Apartments ~ Cherokee Full 62 62 1003 E Ridgeview Dr Cherokee IA 51012 AUTUMN PARK OF CHEROKEE, A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP615 5th St. SIOUX CITY IA 51101 (712) 258-3251 Recap Approves Restructuring Plan 2/4/2020 800005207 Autumn Park Apartments ~ Mason City Full 64 64 710 S Pierce Ave Mason City IA 50401 AUTUMN PARK OF MASON CITY, L.L.P. 615 5th St. SIOUX CITY IA 51101 (712) 258-3251 Recap Approves Restructuring Plan 2/4/2020 800005204 Autumn Park Apartments ~ Chariton Full 58 58 330 N Main St Chariton IA 50049 Autumn Park of Chariton, L.L.P. 615 5th St. Sioux City IA 51101 (712) 258-3251 Recap Approves Restructuring Plan 1/23/2020 800013522 AUTUMN PARK APARTMENTS Full 54 54 411 S ELM AVE HASTINGS NE 68901 AUTUMN PARK OF HASTINGS 615 5th St. SIOUX CITY IA 51101 (712) 258-3251 Restructuring Commitment Executed by Owner 12/27/2019 800000679 Malvern Manor Apartments Lite 20 50 718 Sulphur Springs Rd Malvern AR 72104 Malvern Manor, Limited Partnership 3801 Woodland HeightsLittle Rd Rock AR 72212 501-372-1065 PAE Submits Justification for Recommendation (Form 10.2)10/25/2019 800016600 BLANCHESTER FRIENDS Full 114 114 905 Cherry St Blanchester OH 45107 Blanchester Friends Housing, Inc. 290 Prairie Ave Wilmington OH 45177 937-382-8907 8/28/2019 AOTC Date Action Other than Closing
    [Show full text]
  • Nos. 20-1530, 20-1531, 20-1778, and 20-1780 in the SUPREME COURT of the UNITED STATES STATE of WEST VIRG
    Nos. 20-1530, 20-1531, 20-1778, and 20-1780 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ET AL. _______________________________ THE NORTH AMERICAN COAL CORPORATION, PETITIONER v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ET AL. ______________________________ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE It is hereby certified that all parties required to be served have been served with copies of the BRIEF FOR THE FEDERAL RESPONDENTS IN OPPOSITION, via email and by first-class mail, postage prepaid, this 5th day of August, 2021. [See Attached Service List] As required by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(h), I certify that the document 8956 words, excluding the parts of the document that are exempted by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(d). I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on August 5, 2021. ___________________________________ Elizabeth B. Prelogar Acting Solicitor General Counsel of Record Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 (202) 514-2218 August 5, 2021 Due to the continuing delay in receiving incoming mail at the Department of Justice, in addition to mailing your brief via first-class mail, we would appreciate a fax or email copy of your brief. If that is acceptable to you, please fax your brief to Charlene Goodwin, Supervisor, Case Management Specialist, Office of the Solicitor General, at (202) 514-8844, or email at [email protected]. Ms. Goodwin’s phone number is (202) 514-2218. Thank you for your consideration of this request. 20-1530 WEST VIRGINIA, ET AL. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ET AL.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Stones in the Vicinity of Public Square, Cleveland, Ohio
    BUILDING STONES IN THE VICINITY OF PUBLIC SQUARE, CLEVELAND, OHIO A walking tour in celebration of Earth Science Week 2000 Sponsors: American Institute of Professional Geologists Tour Leader: Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Joseph T. Hannibal Division of Geological Survey Cleveland Museum of Natural History BUILDING STONES IN THE VICINITY OF PUBLIC SQUARE, CLEVELAND, OHIO A walking tour in celebration of Earth Science Week 2000 October 13, 2000 Tour Leader: Joseph T. Hannibal, Curator of Invertebrate Paleontology, The Cleveland Museum of Natural History Sponsors: the American Institute of Professional Geologists, the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey, and The Cleveland Museum of Natural History AIPG Coordinators: Robin E. Roth, Ohio Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Release Compensation Board, and Gary Kotila, Flynn Environmental, Inc. Brochure produced by Merrianne Hackathorn and Lisa Van Doren, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey INTRODUCTION million years ago during the Mississippian Period. A small amount of granite is used along the base of Many kinds of rocks, both locally quarried and imported the exterior of the TerminalTower. The lobby contains floor- from various parts of the world, have been used as building ing of Tennessee marble and walls of Botticino marble (see stones in downtown Cleveland. Examples of igneous, meta- description of the Cleveland Public Library). morphic, and sedimentary rocks can be seen within a short Some 118,000 tons of granite, limestone, and terra- distance from the TerminalTower. The stones used for build- cotta (a fired clay) were used in the original construction ings, monuments, and other structures have been selected of the building.
    [Show full text]
  • Custom Case Goods
    CUSTOM CASE GOODS Made in USA - Woman owned and operated Morrison House OLD TOWN ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA Chapter Room Autograph Collection Marriott OLD CITY, PHILADELPHIA Greatroom 4-Star proptery The Crosby DALLAS, TX Shared meeting and workspace Multi-family development The Lodge at Gulf State Park GULF SHORES, ALABAMA Lobby Hospitality Design Magazine's HD Awards Finalist for interior design. Marriott Key Tower CLEVELAND, OH Lobby 4-Star proptery The Summit CINCINNATI, OH Library Lounge 4-diamond rated Cliff House MAINE Nubbs Lobster Shack Parc Riverside WASHINGTION, D.C. Community space Luxary apartments Reclaimed oak top, integrated LED lighting and power charging. Hyatt Regency PRINCETON, NJ Community space Hotel Lincoln Social Rooftop COLUMBUS, OH Community Space Bar and Restaurant Biaggi's Ristorante Italiano MIDDLETON, WI Bar, Flagship location Formal Italian Restaurant Chain Del Mar SoCal Kitchen COLUMBUS, OH Southern California style Kitchen Del Mar So Cal COLUMBUS, OH Southern California style Kitchen Biaggi's Ristorante Italiano MIDDLETON, WI Flagship location Formal Italian Restaurant Chain Kimpton Hotel Monaco DENVER, CO Hotel Lobby, Community space Marble Room Steaks and Raw Bar Cleveland, OH Ernst & Young, Reception desk Cleveland, OH Cross Street Market Baltimore, MD Marriott Key Tower, Wall art and custom console table Cleveland, OH Solid ash with blackened steel accents Integrated and concealed power Marriott Key Tower, Wall art and custom console table Cleveland, OH Kebony Oyster Table with inset ice troughs Solid ash with blackened steel accents Integrated and concealed power Console table, walnut burl veneer top with powder coated steel legs Coordinating telephone table solid wood turned base with metallic finish The Roosevelt New Orleans A Waldorf Astoria Hotel Walnut live edge communal table Waterfall leg with custom X-shaped bowties Charging units integreated into apron Blackened steel chair frame with fabric cushion.
    [Show full text]