DOCSLIB.ORG

2010 Reference Guide.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

TALL BUILDINGS The 2010 CTBUH Reference Guide of the what, when and where of tall and urban TALL BUILDINGS The 2010 CTBUH Reference Guide of the what, when and where of tall and urban www.ctbuh.org Editor Antony Wood Coordinating Editor & Design Nathaniel Hollister Other Contributors Steven Henry, Jan Klerks, Matthew Lacey, Marshall Gerometta, Philip Oldfi eld Published by The Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat © CTBUH 2010 Printed and bound in Chicago by Source4. Copyright 2010 Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. ISBN 978-0-939493-30-2 CTBUH has endeavored to determine the copyright holders of all images. Those uncredited have been sourced from listed authors or from within CTBUH Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat S. R. Crown Hall t: +1 312 567 3487 Illinois Institute of Technology f: +1 312 567 3820 3360 South State Street e: [email protected] Chicago, IL 60616-3793 www.ctbuh.org Tall Buildings: A Reference Guide This reference guide provides a snapshot of tall buildings internationally, through data, graphs and statistics1. In addition to documenting what is already built, it looks to those projects currently under construction and those proposed, thus giving a clear indication of the trends and directions in the industry. It also describes the CTBUH height criteria upon which tall buildings are measured, and profi les other output from the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat; the recognized source of information on all things tall and urban. 1 Unless otherwise noted all data contained within this reference guide is accurate as of January 4th, 2010. Contents Height Criteria and Defi nitions 7 What is a Tall Building? 8 How is the Height of a Tall Building Measured? 10 Other Criteria: Status, Structure, Floors 12 Height Calculator 14 World’s Tallest 17 The Tallest Ten 18 World’s Tallest Lists 30 50 Tallest Urban Agglomerations 38 Annual Review of Construction 43 2009: A Tall Building Review 44 2008: A Tall Building Review 54 The Past, Present and Future of Tall 63 History of the World’s Tallest 64 Rise of the Supertall 68 Innovative 20: Challenging the Typology 72 Award Winners 85 2009 Award Winners 86 Best Tall Building Awards Criteria & History 91 Lynn S. Beedle Award 94 Fazlur Rahman Khan Medal 96 CTBUH Resources 99 World Congresses/Conferences 100 Publications 104 Other Activities and Output 112 Contents 5 The Tallest Ten The World’s Tallest Ten has undergone dramatic change in the last decade. Three buildings have held the “World’s Tallest Building” title in the last six years, most recently the Burj Khalifa. Of the tallest ten buildings in the world currently, fi ve have been completed since 2003. The mid to long term will inevitably be aff ected by the current global economic recession as less supertall buildings are currently starting on site. However, the recent rapid change of the Tallest Ten is predicted to continue in the immediate future, with fi ve new Tallest Ten buildings scheduled to complete in the next year or two, and numerous others completing after that. The fi ve buildings close to completion are: Makkah Royal Clock Tower Hotel (591m/1939ft); International Commerce Centre (Hong Kong, 483m/1585ft); Nanjing Greenland Financial Center (450m/1476ft); Guangzhou International Finance Center (440m/1444ft); and Kingkey Finance Center (Shenzhen, 439m/1440ft). See pages 28–29 for a diagram and analysis of the tallest ten buildings. 18 World's Tallest Tall Buildings: A Reference Guide ©Ema©Em©E© maararrP P roper pertietietitieies Construction; Arabtec; Besix Construction; Arabtec; and Samsung Engineering Contractor M&E ETA MEP Skidmore Owings &Merrill LLP Structural Engineer Skidmore Owings &Merrill LLP Architect Emaar Properties Owner/Developer 464,511 m²/5,000,118ft² Area Total 162 Floors Total Steel/Concrete Structural Material Offi Building Use 2010 Completion 830m/2723ft Tip to Height 585m/1918ft Highest Floor 828m/2717ft Height Dubai, UAE (1) BurjKhalifa ce/Residential/Hotel World's Tallest World's 19 World’s Tallest Ten (as of January 4th, 2010) Height is measured from the level of the lowest, signifi cant, open-air, pedestrian entrance to the architectural top of the building, including spires, but not including antennae, signage, fl ag poles or other functional-technical equipment. This measurement is the most widely utilized and is employed to defi ne the CTBUH rankings of the World’s Tallest Buildings. See page 10–13 (Height Criteria and Defi nitions) for a full description of the CTBUH height criteria, defi nitions and footnotes. 828m/2717ft 508m/1667ft 492m/1614ft Burj Khalifa 452m/1483ft Dubai 2010 Taipei 101 Taipei Shanghai World 2004 Financial Center Shanghai Petronas Towers 2008 1 & 2 Kuala Lumpur 1998 1 2 3 4 5 28 World's Tallest Tall Buildings: A Reference Guide Location Completion Asia N. America 2010 1990’s Middle East 2000’s 1970’s Structural Material Function Steel Composite Offi ce Mixed-Use Concrete Steel/Concrete 442m/1451ft 423m/1389ft 421m/1380ft 412m/1352ft 390m/1280ft Willis Tower Chicago 1974 Trump International Hotel & Tower Jin Mao Building Chicago Two International Shanghai CITIC Plaza 2009 Finance Centre 1999 Guangzhou Hong Kong 1996 2003 6 7 8 9 10 World's Tallest 29 World’s Tallest Lists The CTBUH organizes tall building projects into three major catagories1: completed, under construction and proposals. The following pages provide lists and statistical information on: the 100 tallest buildings completed, the 50 tallest buildings under construction and the 50 tallest proposals. 1For a full defi nition of CTBUH building status categories, see page 12. 30 World's Tallest Tall Buildings: A Reference Guide The Tallest Buildings Completed The charts below provide an analysis of the tallest 100 completed2 buildings worldwide as of January 2010. The table on the following pages contains information on these projects, including: building name, location, year of completion, number of stories, height in meters and in feet to architectural top and structural material. Location Completion (decade) Structural Material 4% 4% 5% 7% 28% 11% 41% 24% 35% 49% 28% 18% 41% Asia Australasia 1930’s 1980’s Steel Steel/Concrete Middle East Europe 1960’s 1990’s Concrete Concrete/Steel N. America 1970’s 2000’s Composite Unknown FunctionHeight (meters) Stories 5% 5% 7% 7% 20% 17% 11% 34% 57% 62% 72% Hotel Mixed-Use 200’s 500’s 1–49 100–124 Offi ce 300’s 800+ 50–75 125+ Residential 400’s 75–99 2A completed building can be considered such – and added to the “tallest” lists – if it fulfi lls all of the following three criteria: 1) topped out structurally and architecturally, 2) fully-clad, 3) open for business, or at least partially occupied. World's Tallest 31 The World’s 100 Tallest Buildings (Part 1) # Building Location Completion Stories Height (m) Height (ft) Material 1. Burj Khalifa Dubai 2010 168 828 2717 Steel/Concrete 2. Taipei 101 Taipei 2004 101 508 1667 Composite 3. Shanghai World Financial Center Shanghai 2008 101 492 1614 Composite 4. Petronas Tower 1 Kuala Lumpur 1998 88 452 1483 Composite 4. Petronas Tower 2 Kuala Lumpur 1998 88 452 1483 Composite 6. Willis Tower Chicago 1974 108 442 1451 Steel 7. Trump International Hotel & Tower Chicago 2009 98 423 1389 Concrete 8. Jin Mao Building Shanghai 1999 88 421 1380 Composite 9. Two International Finance Centre Hong Kong 2003 88 412 1352 Composite 10. CITIC Plaza Guangzhou 1996 80 390 1280 Concrete 11. Shun Hing Square Shenzhen 1996 69 384 1260 Composite 12. Empire State Building New York 1931 102 381 1250 Steel 13. Central Plaza Hong Kong 1992 78 374 1227 Concrete 14. Bank of China Hong Kong 1989 70 367 1205 Composite 15. Bank of America Tower New York 2009 54 365 1198 Steel 16. Almas Tower Dubai 2008 68 360 1181 Concrete 17. Emirates Tower One Dubai 1999 54 355 1165 Composite 18. Tuntex Sky Tower Kaohsiung 1997 85 348 1140 Composite 19. Aon Center Chicago 1973 83 346 1136 Steel 20. The Center Hong Kong 1998 73 346 1135 Steel 21. John Hancock Center Chicago 1969 100 344 1128 Steel 22. Rose Rotana Tower Dubai 2007 72 333 1093 Composite 23. Shimao International Plaza Shanghai 2006 60 333 1093 Concrete 24. Minsheng Bank Building Wuhan 2008 68 331 1087 Steel 25. China World Trade Center III Beijing 2009 74 330 1083 Steel 26. Q1 Gold Coast 2005 78 323 1058 Concrete 27. Burj al Arab Hotel Dubai 1999 60 321 1053 Composite 28. Nina Tower I Hong Kong 2006 80 319 1046 Concrete 29. Chrysler Building New York 1930 77 319 1046 Steel 30. New York Times Tower New York 2007 52 319 1046 Steel 31. Bank of America Plaza Atlanta 1993 55 317 1039 Composite 32. U.S. Bank Tower Los Angeles 1990 73 310 1018 Steel 33. Menara Telekom Headquarters Kuala Lumpur 1999 55 310 1017 Concrete 34. Emirates Tower Two Dubai 2000 56 309 1014 Concrete 35. AT&T Corporate Center Chicago 1989 60 307 1007 Composite 36. The Address Downtown Burj Dubai Dubai 2008 63 306 1004 Concrete 37. JP Morgan Chase Tower Houston 1982 75 305 1002 Composite 38. Baiyoke Tower II Bangkok 1997 85 304 997 Concrete 39. Two Prudential Plaza Chicago 1990 64 303 995 Concrete 40. Wells Fargo Plaza Houston 1983 71 302 992 Steel 41. Kingdom Centre Riyadh 2002 41 302 992 Steel/Concrete 42.
Recommended publications
  • Residential Building Evacuation-Simulation of Potential

    Residential Building Evacuation-Simulation of Potential

    R. JEVTIĆ RESIDENTIAL BUILDING EVACUATION-SIMULATION OF POTENTIAL Residential Building Evacuation-Simulation of Potential Evacuation Scenarios With Presence of Immobile Persons RADOJE B. JEVTIĆ, Electrotechnical school „Nikola Tesla“, Niš Professional paper UDC: 614.8.084 DOI: 10.5937/tehnika2006814J The increase in urban population leads to the lack of housing in cities. One of potential solutions for this problem is to build tall residential buildings. The height of this objects, in recent times, ranges from several tens of meters even to several hundreds of meters, while the number of residents ranges from several hundred even to several thousands. Although these objects have built related to modern standards and technologies, with usage of modern materials and machines, problems can happen. One of particularly complex and hard problem presents the evacuation of residents in case of some disaster. Problem is much more severe and complicated if there are people with disabilities or people with special needs in the building. The potential solution for this problem can be the usage of simulation software. This paper was written to show the usage of simulation software Pathfinder in calculation of evacuation times for different evacuation scenarios, without the presence of immobile occupants, with presence of immobile occupants in the percentage of 5 % from complete occupant’s number and with presence of immobile occupants in the percentage of 10 % from complete occupant’s number. Key words: evacuation, residential, immobile, scenario 1. INTRODUCTION The advancement of science, the usage of many new technics and materials has led to the advancement High residential buildings present the past, the in architecture, unthinkable before.
  • The “International” Skyscraper: Observations 2. Journal Paper

    The “International” Skyscraper: Observations 2. Journal Paper

    ctbuh.org/papers Title: The “International” Skyscraper: Observations Author: Georges Binder, Managing Director, Buildings & Data SA Subject: Urban Design Keywords: Density Mixed-Use Urban Design Verticality Publication Date: 2008 Original Publication: CTBUH Journal, 2008 Issue I Paper Type: 1. Book chapter/Part chapter 2. Journal paper 3. Conference proceeding 4. Unpublished conference paper 5. Magazine article 6. Unpublished © Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat / Georges Binder The “International” Skyscraper: Observations While using tall buildings data, the following paper aims to show trends and shifts relating to building use and new locations accommodating high-rise buildings. After decades of the American office building being dominate, in the last twelve years we have observed a gradual but major shift from office use to residential and mixed-use for Tall Buildings, and from North America to Asia. The turn of the millennium has also seen major changes in the use of buildings in cities having the longest experience with Tall Buildings. Chicago is witnessing a series of office buildings being transformed into residential or mixed-use buildings, a phenomenon also occurring on a large scale in New York. In midtown Manhattan of New York City we note the transformation of major hotels into residential projects. The transformation of landmark projects in midtown New York City is making an impact, but it is not at all comparable to the number of new projects being built in Asia. When conceiving new projects, we should perhaps bear in mind that, in due time, these will also experience major shifts in uses and we should plan for this in advance.
  • Structural Development of Skyscrapers

    Structural Development of Skyscrapers

    International Journal of Advances in Mechanical and Civil Engineering, ISSN: 2394-2827 Volume-4, Issue-3, Jun.-2017 http://iraj.in STRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT OF SKYSCRAPERS 1ABHISHEK GUPTA, 2S.M. GUPTA 1,2NIT KURUKSHETRA, HARYANA, INDIA E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract- This paper presents a review on the evolution of the structural system of skyscrapers from earlier to the modern and the effects of this on the society and environment Keywords- Skyscrapper/Tall Buildings, Height Premium, Internal, external and hybrid structural system, Building Loads, Shear Walls, lateral rigidity, Lateral Sway, Floor Vibration I. INTRODUCTION iron. The inventor Henry Bessemer took out a patent on the process in 1855. Tall buildings emerged in the late nineteenth century In 1857, Elisha Otis and the Otis Elevator Company in the United States of America. They constituted a began manufacturing passenger elevators. Invention so-called “American Building Type,” meaning that of Elevator allowed vertical transportation of people most important tall buildings were built in the U.S.A. and goods without stair Today, however, they are a worldwide architectural Chicago is the birthplace of the skyscraper The Home phenomenon. Many tall buildings are built Insurance building (1885) in Chicago, (ten storied worldwide, especially in Asian countries, such as with 42 meter in height) is generally referred as the China, Korea, Japan, and Malaysia. first high rise building (Architect :William Jenney) The Home Insurance Building was built followed by The distribution of tall buildings has changed the Great Chicago Fire, 1871 radically with Asia now having the largest share with • The physical envelope of construction was 38%, and North America’s at 22%(Fig.
  • 333 North Michigan Buildi·N·G- 333 N

    333 North Michigan Buildi·N·G- 333 N

    PRELIMINARY STAFF SUfv1MARY OF INFORMATION 333 North Michigan Buildi·n·g- 333 N. Michigan Avenue Submitted to the Conwnission on Chicago Landmarks in June 1986. Rec:ornmended to the City Council on April I, 1987. CITY OF CHICAGO Richard M. Daley, Mayor Department of Planning and Development J.F. Boyle, Jr., Commissioner 333 NORTH MICIDGAN BUILDING 333 N. Michigan Ave. (1928; Holabird & Roche/Holabird & Root) The 333 NORTH MICHIGAN BUILDING is one of the city's most outstanding Art Deco-style skyscrapers. It is one of four buildings surrounding the Michigan A venue Bridge that defines one of the city' s-and nation' s-finest urban spaces. The building's base is sheathed in polished granite, in shades of black and purple. Its upper stories, which are set back in dramatic fashion to correspond to the city's 1923 zoning ordinance, are clad in buff-colored limestone and dark terra cotta. The building's prominence is heightened by its unique site. Due to the jog of Michigan Avenue at the bridge, the building is visible the length of North Michigan Avenue, appearing to be located in the center of the street. ABOVE: The 333 North Michigan Building was one of the first skyscrapers to take advantage of the city's 1923 zoning ordinance, which encouraged the construction of buildings with setback towers. This photograph was taken from the cupola of the London Guarantee Building. COVER: A 1933 illustration, looking south on Michigan Avenue. At left: the 333 North Michigan Building; at right the Wrigley Building. 333 NORTH MICHIGAN BUILDING 333 North Michigan Avenue Architect: Holabird and Roche/Holabird and Root Date of Construction: 1928 0e- ~ 1QQ 2 00 Cft T Dramatically sited where Michigan Avenue crosses the Chicago River are four build­ ings that collectively illustrate the profound stylistic changes that occurred in American architecture during the decade of the 1920s.
  • Social Media and Popular Places: the Case of Chicago Kheir Al-Kodmany†

    Social Media and Popular Places: the Case of Chicago Kheir Al-Kodmany†

    International Journal of High-Rise Buildings International Journal of June 2019, Vol 8, No 2, 125-136 High-Rise Buildings https://doi.org/10.21022/IJHRB.2019.8.2.125 www.ctbuh-korea.org/ijhrb/index.php Social Media and Popular Places: The Case of Chicago Kheir Al-Kodmany† Department of Urban Planning and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA Abstract This paper offers new ways to learn about popular places in the city. Using locational data from Social Media platforms platforms, including Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram, along with participatory field visits and combining insights from architecture and urban design literature, this study reveals popular socio-spatial clusters in the City of Chicago. Locational data of photographs were visualized by using Geographic Information Systems and helped in producing heat maps that showed the spatial distribution of posted photographs. Geo-intensity of photographs illustrated areas that are most popularly visited in the city. The study’s results indicate that the city’s skyscrapers along open spaces are major elements of image formation. Findings also elucidate that Social Media plays an important role in promoting places; and thereby, sustaining a greater interest and stream of visitors. Consequently, planners should tap into public’s digital engagement in city places to improve tourism and economy. Keywords: Social media, Iconic socio-spatial clusters, Popular places, Skyscrapers 1. Introduction 1.1. Sustainability: A Theoretical Framework The concept of sustainability continues to be of para- mount importance to our cities (Godschalk & Rouse, 2015). Planners, architects, economists, environmentalists, and politicians continue to use the term in their conver- sations and writings.
  • Chicago Tourist Information 7 August, 2003

    Chicago Tourist Information 7 August, 2003

    Lepton Photon 2003 Chicago Tourist Information 7 August, 2003 XXI International Symposium on Lepton and Photon Interactions at High Energies Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, IL USA 11 – 16 August 2003 CHICAGO TOURIST INFORMATION Wednesday 13 August 2003 is a free day at the Lepton Photon 2003 Symposium. The Symposium banquet will be held in the evening at Navy Pier in downtown Chicago. It will begin with a reception at 6:30 p.m., followed by dinner at 7:30 p.m. There will be a lakefront fireworks display right off the pier at 9:30 p.m. Buses will depart from Navy Pier around 10:00 p.m. We hope that many of you will take advantage of the time to visit Chicago. We will run several buses to Chicago in the morning. There will be a few additional buses in the afternoon. Detailed schedules will be available at the beginning of the conference and sign-up for the bus transportation is requested. We have some suggestions for tours you might take or sights you might see depending on your interests. Please be aware that many of the attractions are internationally renowned and, depending on the time of the year and the weather, can be quite crowded and have long waits for admission. In some cases, you can get tickets in advance through the web or Ticketron. All times and fees are for Wednesday, 13 August 2003 and do vary from day to day. More information is available in the materials we have provided in the registration packet and at the official city of Chicago Website: http://www.cityofchicago.org.
  • Presentation Slides

    Presentation Slides

    A Developer’s Perspective of Creating a Healthy Community for All Ages Friday, May 7, 2021 Delivering more, through balance 3 Triple Chinachem Group takes tremendous pride in its balanced approach to business. We operate not solely for profit, but with the higher aim of Bottom Line contributing to society. We want to create positive value for our users and customers, the community and the environment, thereby achieving the triple bottom line of benefits to People, Prosperity and Planet. People Prosperity Planet 4 How a triple bottom line works? 5 Sustainability PEOPLE Principles To engage stakeholders and staff, while respecting each other, in contributing to sustainable development as well Derived From as nurturing diversity and a culture of inclusiveness in Triple Bottom communities Line PROSPERITY To deliver products and services that meet the community's current and future needs in a safe, efficient and sustainable manner, and to make our city more liveable and sustainable PLANET To integrate environmental considerations into all aspects of planning, design and operations for minimising resource and energy consumption as well as reducing the environmental impacts "Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.” United Nations 1987 Brundtland Commission Report 7 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals The Group makes reference to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in developing its short, medium and long-term goals 8 Carbon The Strategic Roadmaps and Sustainability Plan (CCG3038) was developed in 2019 Reduction Target - All business units should provide their roadmaps to achieve the group target of 38% carbon emissions reduction in 2030 as compared with 2015.
  • Structural Developments in Tall Buildings: Current Trends and Future Prospects

    Structural Developments in Tall Buildings: Current Trends and Future Prospects

    © 2007 University of Sydney. All rights reserved. Architectural Science Review www.arch.usyd.edu.au/asr Volume 50.3, pp 205-223 Invited Review Paper Structural Developments in Tall Buildings: Current Trends and Future Prospects Mir M. Ali† and Kyoung Sun Moon Structures Division, School of Architecture, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA †Corresponding Author: Tel: + 1 217 333 1330; Fax: +1 217 244 2900; E-mail: [email protected] Received 8 May; accepted 13 June 2007 Abstract: Tall building developments have been rapidly increasing worldwide. This paper reviews the evolution of tall building’s structural systems and the technological driving force behind tall building developments. For the primary structural systems, a new classification – interior structures and exterior structures – is presented. While most representative structural systems for tall buildings are discussed, the emphasis in this review paper is on current trends such as outrigger systems and diagrid structures. Auxiliary damping systems controlling building motion are also discussed. Further, contemporary “out-of-the-box” architectural design trends, such as aerodynamic and twisted forms, which directly or indirectly affect the structural performance of tall buildings, are reviewed. Finally, the future of structural developments in tall buildings is envisioned briefly. Keywords: Aerodynamics, Building forms, Damping systems, Diagrid structures, Exterior structures, Interior structures, Outrigger systems, Structural performance, Structural systems, Tall buildings Introduction Tall buildings emerged in the late nineteenth century in revolution – the steel skeletal structure – as well as consequent the United States of America. They constituted a so-called glass curtain wall systems, which occurred in Chicago, has led to “American Building Type,” meaning that most important tall the present state-of-the-art skyscraper.
  • Bringing an Icon Into the Future: Willis Tower

    Bringing an Icon Into the Future: Willis Tower

    CTBUH Research Paper ctbuh.org/papers Title: Bringing an Icon into the Future: Willis Tower Author: Stephen Katz, Senior Associate, Gensler Subjects: Architectural/Design Building Case Study Interior Design Keywords: Renovation Supertall Publication Date: 2019 Original Publication: 2019 Chicago 10th World Congress Proceedings - 50 Forward | 50 Back Paper Type: 1. Book chapter/Part chapter 2. Journal paper 3. Conference proceeding 4. Unpublished conference paper 5. Magazine article 6. Unpublished © Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat / Stephen Katz Bringing an Icon into the Future: Willis Tower Abstract Stephen Katz Senior Associate Few buildings are as iconic as Willis Tower. Generations of Chicagoans have a collective memory Gensler of this building playing a role in their entire lives. Chicagoans mark time with Willis Tower, but Chicago, United States time has caught up with this aging supertall. The way the building engages with the city and its occupants needed a fresh approach. Understanding how Willis Tower is being reimagined Based in Gensler’s Chicago office, Stephen is a by new owners is crucial to the success of old and new supertall towers around the globe. This Senior Associate and Technical Director. Stephen paper examines the efforts of the design team as it created a new path forward for Willis Tower. has worked and lectured in the United States, Asia, and Europe and has authored papers about A new city-block-sized podium structure and substantial infrastructure improvements are part façade design and sustainability. Stephen is a of this work (see Figure 1), and the results have a dramatic effect on a piece of civic history while founding member of Gensler Enclosures; a group transforming the building into a destination for tenants and visitors alike.
  • BOMA 360 Adds up to and Renewals in the Program: MOST BUILDING DESIGNATIONS OVERALL 1

    BOMA 360 Adds up to and Renewals in the Program: MOST BUILDING DESIGNATIONS OVERALL 1

    PERFORMANCE PROGRAM ® TOP 10 COMPANIES More than 125 owners and manage- ment companies already recognize the value the BOMA 360 designation brings to their buildings. These companies are leading the way with the most building designations BOMA 360 Adds Up to and renewals in the program: MOST BUILDING DESIGNATIONS OVERALL 1. Cushman & Wakefield 2. Piedmont SUCCESS 3. Brookfield 4. CBRE If you only do one thing to improve the performance 5. Cousins Properties of your commercial property, this is it: 6. JBG Smith EARN THE BOMA 360 DESIGNATION. 7. The RMR Group LLC With the BOMA 360 designation, you can single-handedly increase your tenant satisfac- 8. Hines tion scores, boost rental rates, lower vacancy levels and outperform the competition. 9. Oracle America, Inc. BOMA 360 gives buildings an edge—and the numbers back this up. 10. SL Green Realty Corp. Going through the application process for the BOMA 360 Performance program gives property teams an objective, holistic evaluation of how the building is being managed These companies had the most and what could be improved. Even great property teams can find areas of improvement building designations and renewals in everything from tenant outreach to sustainability efforts.. in the past year: Over and over, property professionals at BOMA 360-designated buildings talk about MOST DESIGNATIONS the transformative power of the BOMA 360 program to bring their operations and their IN THE PAST YEAR teams into greater alignment. And this leads to measurable benefits: • BOMA 360-designated buildings average $7.51 more per square foot (psf) in rental 1. Brookfield income and $6.25 psf more in net operating income than buildings without the des- 2.
  • Please See a List of Our Project References

    Please See a List of Our Project References

    PROJECT REFERRENCES PROJECT CONSULTANT DUBAI: OPERA HOUSE – DOWNTOWN DUBAI WS ATKINS BLUEWATERS WHARF RETAILS – DUBAI WSP BLUEWATERS HOSPITALITY – DUBAI CKR CONSULTING DUBAI MALL EXTENSION WSP NAS ARENA DAR AL HANDASAH WAFI HOTEL & MALL EXTENSION ARKITEKNIK W HOTEL & RESIDENCES HYDER CONSULTING THE ADDRESS RESIDENCES – SKY VIEW NORR ARCHITECTS CITY WALK – RESIDENTIAL BLOCKS HYDER CONSULTING DUBAI CREEK HARBOUR DEV – RESIDENCES ATKINS DUBAI AIRPORT EXTENSION- Terminal 01 & 02 DAR AL HANDASAH DUBAI INT. AIRPORT, CUC 3-AX203 – DUBAI DAL AL HANDASAH DUBAI INT. AIRPORT, CUC 5-AX205 – DUBAI DAR AL HANDASAH BLUEWATER DEVELOPMENTS – DUBAI WSP DUBAI METRO WS ATKINS DOWNTOWN DUBAI DEV KHATIB & ALAMI LAKESIDE TOWER-JLW KHATIB & ALAMI JALILA HOSPITSAL STUDIO ALTIERI BURJUMAN REFURBISHMENT HYDER CONSULTING DUBAI MALL MEINHARDT HEALTH CARE CITY – DUBAI ARIF & BINTOAK SHARJAH HOSPITAL CANSULTMAUNSELL NOVOTEL – DUBAI ARIF & BINTOAK GRAND HYATT HOTEL – DUBAI ARKITEKNIK MARINA MANSIONS – DUBAI WS ATKINS SHANGRI-LA HOTEL – DUBAI NOOR PROJECT REFERRENCES PROJECT CONSULTANT AL BASSAM TOWER – DUBAI WS ATKINS REEF MALL - DUBAI RMJM BRIGHT START TOWER – DUBAI WS ATKINS DUBAI INT. FINANCIAL CENTRE – DUBAI RMJM AL SALAM TOWER – DUBAI WS ATKINS AL MANKHOOL TOWER – DUBAI WS ATKINS JUMEIRA BEACH RESIDENCE - 01 – DUBAI HYDER CONSULTING JUMEIRA BEACH RESIDENCE – 03 – DUBAI ARENCO JUMEIRA BEACH RESIDENCE – 04 – DUBAI ARIF & BINTOAK DUBAI FESTIVAL CITY – DUBAI HYDER CONSULTING BUR JUMAN EXPANSION PROJECT – DUBAI DAR AL HANDASAH DWTC HALL 8 – DUBAI RMJM DWTC HALLS 1 & 2 – DUBAI RMJM POLICE NEW HEADQUARTERS - DUBAI ARENCO ZABEEL PARK – DUBAI WS ATKINS D.I.A – FUEL STAGING AREA-AX253 DAR AL HANDASAH FLOWER CENTRE D.I.A – DUBAI WS ATKINS ATLANTIS PROJECT - DUBAI NORR GROUP IBIS HOTEL – DUBAI ARIF & BINTOAK DUBAI MARINA – SOUTH MARINA MOTT MacDONALD CINE STAR CINEMA – DUBAI RMJM KNOWLEDGE VILLAGE – DUBAI IAN BANHAM EMIRATES INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL – DUBAI CONSULTAIR H.H.
  • In the United States District Court Western District of Missouri Central Division

    In the United States District Court Western District of Missouri Central Division

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION MISSOURI COALITION FOR THE ) ENVIRONMENT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case Number: 03-4217-CV-C-NKL ) MICHAEL O. LEAVITT, Administrator ) of the United States Environmental ) Protection Agency, and THE UNITED ) STATES ENVIRONMENTAL ) PROTECTION AGENCY, ) ) Defendants. ) PLAINTIFF’S SUGGESTIONS IN OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION TO INTERVENE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE AGENCIES AND THE URBAN AREAS COALITION Plaintiff Missouri Coalition for the Environment (“MCE”) files this opposition to the motion to intervene of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies and the Urban Areas Coalition (the “Associations”). The Associations move for both intervention as of right and permissive intervention. MCE opposes both grounds of the motion. MCE does not dispute the general requirements for intervention as of right set forth on page four of the Associations’ Suggestions in Support. However, as further explained below, MCE opposes the motion to intervene as of right on the grounds that it was not timely and that it failed to demonstrate that the Associations have a recognized interest that stands to be impaired by the outcome of this litigation. MCE does not dispute the general requirements for permissive intervention set forth on page fourteen of the Associations’ Suggestions in Support, but adds that the timeliness requirement also applies to motions for permissive intervention. MCE opposes the motion for permissive intervention on the grounds that it was untimely and that such intervention would unduly delay and prejudice the adjudication of MCE’s claims. I. The Associations’ Motion Should be Denied on the Ground that it was Untimely.