Mark-To-Market (M2M) Transactions
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Simon Property Group, Inc
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 001-14469 04-6268599 (State or other jurisdiction of (Commission File No.) (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 225 West Washington Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 (Address of principal executive offices) (ZIP Code) (317) 636-1600 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act: Name of each exchange Title of each class on which registered Common stock, $0.0001 par value New York Stock Exchange 6% Series I Convertible Perpetual Preferred Stock, $0.0001 par value New York Stock Exchange 83⁄8% Series J Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.0001 par value New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer (as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act). Yes ፤ No អ Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes អ No ፤ Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. -
BOMA 360 Adds up to and Renewals in the Program: MOST BUILDING DESIGNATIONS OVERALL 1
PERFORMANCE PROGRAM ® TOP 10 COMPANIES More than 125 owners and manage- ment companies already recognize the value the BOMA 360 designation brings to their buildings. These companies are leading the way with the most building designations BOMA 360 Adds Up to and renewals in the program: MOST BUILDING DESIGNATIONS OVERALL 1. Cushman & Wakefield 2. Piedmont SUCCESS 3. Brookfield 4. CBRE If you only do one thing to improve the performance 5. Cousins Properties of your commercial property, this is it: 6. JBG Smith EARN THE BOMA 360 DESIGNATION. 7. The RMR Group LLC With the BOMA 360 designation, you can single-handedly increase your tenant satisfac- 8. Hines tion scores, boost rental rates, lower vacancy levels and outperform the competition. 9. Oracle America, Inc. BOMA 360 gives buildings an edge—and the numbers back this up. 10. SL Green Realty Corp. Going through the application process for the BOMA 360 Performance program gives property teams an objective, holistic evaluation of how the building is being managed These companies had the most and what could be improved. Even great property teams can find areas of improvement building designations and renewals in everything from tenant outreach to sustainability efforts.. in the past year: Over and over, property professionals at BOMA 360-designated buildings talk about MOST DESIGNATIONS the transformative power of the BOMA 360 program to bring their operations and their IN THE PAST YEAR teams into greater alignment. And this leads to measurable benefits: • BOMA 360-designated buildings average $7.51 more per square foot (psf) in rental 1. Brookfield income and $6.25 psf more in net operating income than buildings without the des- 2. -
In the United States District Court Western District of Missouri Central Division
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION MISSOURI COALITION FOR THE ) ENVIRONMENT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case Number: 03-4217-CV-C-NKL ) MICHAEL O. LEAVITT, Administrator ) of the United States Environmental ) Protection Agency, and THE UNITED ) STATES ENVIRONMENTAL ) PROTECTION AGENCY, ) ) Defendants. ) PLAINTIFF’S SUGGESTIONS IN OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION TO INTERVENE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE AGENCIES AND THE URBAN AREAS COALITION Plaintiff Missouri Coalition for the Environment (“MCE”) files this opposition to the motion to intervene of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies and the Urban Areas Coalition (the “Associations”). The Associations move for both intervention as of right and permissive intervention. MCE opposes both grounds of the motion. MCE does not dispute the general requirements for intervention as of right set forth on page four of the Associations’ Suggestions in Support. However, as further explained below, MCE opposes the motion to intervene as of right on the grounds that it was not timely and that it failed to demonstrate that the Associations have a recognized interest that stands to be impaired by the outcome of this litigation. MCE does not dispute the general requirements for permissive intervention set forth on page fourteen of the Associations’ Suggestions in Support, but adds that the timeliness requirement also applies to motions for permissive intervention. MCE opposes the motion for permissive intervention on the grounds that it was untimely and that such intervention would unduly delay and prejudice the adjudication of MCE’s claims. I. The Associations’ Motion Should be Denied on the Ground that it was Untimely. -
Notice of Status Conference
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: ) Chapter 11 PRIMARY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., ) PHS CLEVELAND, INC., ) Case No. 99-615 (MFW) PHS PHYSICIAN MANAGEMENT OF ) PHS MT. SINAI, INC., OHIO, INC., ) (Jointly Administered) PRIMARY HEALTH SYSTEMS OF ) INC., OHIO, L.P., PHS ST. ALEXIS, ) Adv. Case No. (JKF) PHS LAURELWOOD, INC., ) PHS ROXBOROUGH, INC., and ) LOWER BUCKS, INC., ) ) Debtors, ) Adv. Pro. Nos. (01-200 through 01 ) 285)(01-402 through 01-416) (01-418 ) through 01-432) (01-449 through 01-523) (01-684 through 01-694) (01-701 through OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF ) and ) 01-739) (01-740 through 01-743) UNSECURED CREDITORS, ) (01-9994) Plaintiff, ) ) ) V. ) ) ACCENT SERVICE COMPANY ) INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., ) Defendants. ) I NOTICE OF STATUS CONFERENCE of, a status PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, unless settled or otherwise disposed Judith K. conference will be held on September 23, 2002 at 2:00 p.m. before The Honorable 824 N. Market Fitzgerald, at the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, Street, Wilmington, Delaware in the above-captioned adversary proceedings. CVODý, ý--IDS GMOA3DAQ Dated: August 8, 2002 Wilmington, Delaware THE BAYARD FIRM By: Neil B. G sman (No. 2087) Christopher P. Simon (No. 3697) Christopher A. Ward (No. 3877) 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 900 Wilmington, Delaware 19899 Telephone: (302) 655-5000 Facsimile: (302) 658-6395 -and Reginald W. Jackson Tiffany Strelow Cobb VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE LLP 52 East Gay Street P.O. Box 1008 Columbus, Ohio 43216-1008 (614) 464-6400 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2002, I caused a copy of I, Christopher A. -
2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update
2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update FINAL REPORT | SEPTEMBER 2020 This document is the final report as approved and adopted by the City of Brookhaven Mayor and City Council on October 13, 2020. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update Prepared by Prepared for The City of Brookhaven John Arthur Ernst, Jr. – Mayor Linley Jones – City Council District 1 John Park – City Council District 2 Madeleine Simmons – City Council District 3 Joe Gebbia – City Council District 4 Christian Sigman – City Manager Public Works Department Hari Karikaran – Director September 2020 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................................................................................I LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................................................................................................... II LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................................................................................ II CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 REPORT ORGANIZATION ..................................................................................................................................................................... -
Manhattan Year BA-NY H&R Original Purchaser Sold Address(Es)
Manhattan Year BA-NY H&R Original Purchaser Sold Address(es) Location Remains UN Plaza Hotel (Park Hyatt) 1981 1 UN Plaza Manhattan N Reader's Digest 1981 28 West 23rd Street Manhattan Y NYC Dept of General Services 1981 NYC West Manhattan * Summit Hotel 1981 51 & LEX Manhattan N Schieffelin and Company 1981 2 Park Avenue Manhattan Y Ernst and Company 1981 1 Battery Park Plaza Manhattan Y Reeves Brothers, Inc. 1981 104 W 40th Street Manhattan Y Alpine Hotel 1981 NYC West Manhattan * Care 1982 660 1st Ave. Manhattan Y Brooks Brothers 1982 1120 Ave of Amer. Manhattan Y Care 1982 660 1st Ave. Manhattan Y Sanwa Bank 1982 220 Park Avenue Manhattan Y City Miday Club 1982 140 Broadway Manhattan Y Royal Business Machines 1982 Manhattan Manhattan * Billboard Publications 1982 1515 Broadway Manhattan Y U.N. Development Program 1982 1 United Nations Plaza Manhattan N Population Council 1982 1 Dag Hammarskjold Plaza Manhattan Y Park Lane Hotel 1983 36 Central Park South Manhattan Y U.S. Trust Company 1983 770 Broadway Manhattan Y Ford Foundation 1983 320 43rd Street Manhattan Y The Shoreham 1983 33 W 52nd Street Manhattan Y MacMillen & Co 1983 Manhattan Manhattan * Solomon R Gugenheim 1983 1071 5th Avenue Manhattan * Museum American Bell (ATTIS) 1983 1 Penn Plaza, 2nd Floor Manhattan Y NYC Office of Prosecution 1983 80 Center Street, 6th Floor Manhattan Y Mc Hugh, Leonard & O'Connor 1983 Manhattan Manhattan * Keene Corporation 1983 757 3rd Avenue Manhattan Y Melhado, Flynn & Assocs. 1983 530 5th Avenue Manhattan Y Argentine Consulate 1983 12 W 56th Street Manhattan Y Carol Management 1983 122 E42nd St Manhattan Y Chemical Bank 1983 277 Park Avenue, 2nd Floor Manhattan Y Merrill Lynch 1983 55 Water Street, Floors 36 & 37 Manhattan Y WNET Channel 13 1983 356 W 58th Street Manhattan Y Hotel President (Best Western) 1983 234 W 48th Street Manhattan Y First Boston Corp 1983 5 World Trade Center Manhattan Y Ruffa & Hanover, P.C. -
WILLIAM DOUGLAS ZWEIG, Et Al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI Supreme Court No . SC92581 WILLIAM DOUGLAS ZWEIG, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Respondents/Cross-Appellants, vs. THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Respondent. SUBSTITUTE BRIEF OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CLEAN WATER AGENCIES, THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FLOOD AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AGENCIES, THE AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION AND THE ASSOCIATION OF MISSOURI CLEANWATER AGENCIES AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT-APPELLANT/CROSS-RESPONDENT THE METROPOLITAN ST. LOUIS SEWER DISTRICT David W. Burchmore Aimee Davenport Squire, Sanders & Dempsey (US) LLP Lathrop & Gage LLP 4900 Key Tower 314 E. High Street 127 Public Square Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 Cleveland, OH 44114-1304 (573) 893-4336 (216) 479-8500 Matthew A. Jacober Nathan Gardner-Andrews Lathrop & Gage LLP General Counsel 7701 Forsyth Boulevard, Suite 500 National Association Of Clean Clayton, Missouri 63105 Water Agencies (314) 613-2845 1816 Jefferson Place, NW Washington, DC 20036-2505 Attorneys for the Amici Curiae (202) 833-3692 TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages STATEMENT OF INTEREST ........................................................................................... 1 ARGUMENT ....................................................................................................................... 6 I. STORMWATER USER FEES BASED ON IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA ARE THE INDUSTRY NORM AND ARE DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE COST OF SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE STORMWATER -
We Are America's Travel Industry, A
The Honorable Mitch McConnell The Honorable Nancy Pelosi Majority Leader Speaker of the House of Representatives United States Senate United States House of Representatives Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 The Honorable Charles Schumer The Honorable Kevin McCarthy Minority Leader Minority Leader United States Senate United States House of Representatives Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 March 20, 2020 Dear Leader McConnell, Leader Schumer, Speaker Pelosi, and Leader McCarthy: We are America’s travel industry, an economic sector that directly employs 9 million American workers and supports a total of 15.8 million jobs. The travel and tourism industry—including but not limited to transportation, lodging, recreation and entertainment, food and beverage, meetings, conferences and business events, travel advisors, destination marketers—is comprised of businesses of all sizes, but the vast majority, 83%, are small businesses. Together we are grappling with the immediate and devastating impact of the current health crisis. Furloughs of American travel workers are happening right now. Travel to and within the United States has essentially ground to a stop due to the actions needed to halt the spread of coronavirus. Aggressive financial relief is needed immediately. Taking care of our employees will always be our top priority, but the hard fact is we cannot continue supporting them through this disaster without relief. To that end, we greatly appreciate and strongly support provisions in the ‘‘Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act’’ that provide: • $300 billion for enhanced Small Business Administration (SBA) loans distributed through an expedited process and can be partially forgiven for employee retention; and • Tax relief to mitigate economic losses, including deferral of tax liability, extension of the Net Operating Loss deduction, and delay of estimated tax payments. -
Zbwleibniz-Informationszentrum
A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Huang, Daisy J.; Leung, Charles Ka Yui; Tse, Chung-Yi Working Paper What account for the differences in rent-price ratio and turnover rate? A search-and-matching approach ISER Discussion Paper, No. 990 Provided in Cooperation with: The Institute of Social and Economic Research (ISER), Osaka University Suggested Citation: Huang, Daisy J.; Leung, Charles Ka Yui; Tse, Chung-Yi (2017) : What account for the differences in rent-price ratio and turnover rate? A search-and-matching approach, ISER Discussion Paper, No. 990, Osaka University, Institute of Social and Economic Research (ISER), Osaka This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/197722 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. -
Landscape Architecture … Is a Social Art
Landscape architecture … is a social art. – Lawrence Halprin, 2003 The Landscape Architecture of Lawrence Halprin The Cultural Landscape Foundation connecting people to places™ ® tclf.org What’s Out There [cover] Roger Foley Franklin Delano Roosevelt Memorial 2016 C-print 36 x 24 inches [opposite] Roger Foley Fountain Detail, Franklin Delano Roosevelt Memorial 2016 Acknowledgements This gallery guide was created to accompany the traveling photographic exhibition The Landscape Architecture of Lawrence Halprin, which debuted at the National Building Museum on November 5, 2016. The exhibition was organized by The Cultural Landscape Foundation (TCLF), and co-curated by Charles A. Birnbaum, President & CEO, FASLA, FAAR, Nord Wennerstrom, Director of Communications, and Eleanor Cox, Project Manager, in collaboration with G. Martin Moeller, Jr., Senior Curator at the National Building Museum. The production of this guide would not have been possible without the help and support of the Halprin family, and the archivists at the Architectural Archives of the University of Pennsylvania, where Lawrence Halprin’s archive is kept. We wish to thank the site owners and administrators who graciously allowed us to document their properties, particularly Richard Grey, Diana Bonyhadi, Emma Chapman, and Anna Halprin, who allowed us access to their private residences. We also wish to thank the photographers who generously donated their time and energy to documenting these sites, and Russell Hart for proofing the photography. Finally, we are grateful to the National Building Museum’s Chase W. Rynd, Hon. ASLA, President and Executive Director of THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE OF the National Building Museum, Nancy Bateman, Registrar, Cathy Frankel, Vice President for Exhibitions and Collections, and G. -
Big Buy Reimbursement Program Property Status.2010-07-02.Xlsx Page 1 of 295
Big Buy Reimbursement Program Property Status.2010-07-02.xlsx Page 1 of 295 Multifamily Hub Name Property Name City State Official Big Buy Status BBRP Status Not Interested in Atlanta ADA FERRELL GARDEN APTS (THDA) TULLAHOMA TN Participating Ineligible: inactive in iREMS Evaluation Report Mailed Atlanta ADAIRVILLE ARMS APARTMENTS ADAIRVILLE KY to the Owner Ineligible: Evaluation Completed Evaluation Report Mailed Atlanta ALCO APTS SCOTTSVILLE KY to the Owner Ineligible: Evaluation Completed Evaluation Report Mailed Atlanta ALDERMAN GARDEN APARTMENTS FLATWOODS KY to the Owner Ineligible: Evaluation Completed Not Interested in Atlanta Alpha A Fowler Community DOUGLASVILLE GA Participating Ineligible: Exempt Evaluation Report Mailed Atlanta ALTA LOMA APTS NASHVILLE TN to the Owner Ineligible: inactive in iREMS Evaluation Report Mailed Atlanta ALTURAS DEL SENORIAL SAN JUAN PR to the Owner Ineligible: Evaluation Completed Not Interested in Atlanta AMBER VILLAGE EDDYVILLE KY Participating Ineligible: Exempt Atlanta ANDERSON PLACE LOUISVILLE KY Interested in Participating Ineligible: Exempt Evaluation Report Mailed Atlanta Anthony Arms L P MACON GA to the Owner Ineligible: Evaluation Completed Not Interested in Atlanta AQUEDUCT PLACE, INC. LEXINGTON KY Participating Ineligible: Exempt Not Interested in Atlanta Ashley House Apartments VALDOSTA GA Participating Ineligible: Exempt Not Interested in Ineligible: Not Interested in Atlanta Athens Gardens ATHENS GA Participating Participating Evaluation Report Mailed Atlanta Augusta Manor AUGUSTA GA -
240 Central Park South Apartments
Landmarks Preservation Commission June 25, 2002, Designation List 337 LP-2116 240 CENTRAL PARK SOUTH APARTMENTS, 240 Central Park South (aka 232-246 Central Park South (West 59th Street), 233-241West58th Street, and 1792-1810Broadway), Manhattan. Built 1939-40; [Albert] Mayer & [Julian H.] Whittlesey, architects; J.H. Taylor Construction Co., builders. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1030, Lot 58. On April 30, 2002, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of 240 Central Park South Apartments and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 1). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Nineteen people spoke in favor of designation, including representatives of Central Park South Associates (the property's owners), Manhattan Borough President C. Virginia Fields, CityCouncilmember Eva Moskowitz, New York Assemblyman Richard N. Gottfried, Municipal Art Society, New York Landmarks Conservancy, Historic Districts Council, Landmark West!, DOCOMOMO New York Tri-State, Modern Architecture Working Group, and architect-historian Robert A.M. Stern. One speaker opposed designation. In addition, the Commission received numerous letters and postcards in support of designation, including a resolution from Community Board 5 and letters from City Councilmember Christine C. Quinn, former Councilmember Ronnie M. Eldridge, Friends of Terra Cotta, National Society of Mural Painters, and Art Deco Society of New York. Summary 240 Central Park South Apartments, built in 1939-40 to the design of Mayer & Whittlesey, is a significant and innovative complex that represents the transition between 1930s Art Deco style apartment towers with courtyards (characteristic of Central Park West) and post-World War II "modernist" apartment houses.