DOCSLIB.ORG

Bon Secour Bay, Alabama and Perdido Bay, Florida

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bon Secour Bay, Alabama and Perdido Bay, Florida The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Master's Theses Spring 2020 Nearshore Sedimentology of Eroding Microtidal Estuaries: Bon Secour Bay, Alabama and Perdido Bay, Florida Jennifer Simpson Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Simpson, Jennifer, "Nearshore Sedimentology of Eroding Microtidal Estuaries: Bon Secour Bay, Alabama and Perdido Bay, Florida" (2020). Master's Theses. 717. https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/717 This Masters Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NEARSHORE SEDIMENTOLOGY OF ERODING MICROTIDAL ESTUARIES: BON SECOUR BAY, ALABAMA AND PERDIDO BAY, FLORIDA by Jennifer L. Simpson A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School, the College of Arts and Sciences and the School of Biological, Environmental, and Earth Sciences at The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Approved by: Dr. Franklin T. Heitmuller, Committee Chair Dr. T. Markham Puckett Dr. Carl A. “Andy” Reese Dr. Davin J. Wallace ____________________ ____________________ ____________________ Dr. Franklin T. Heitmuller Dr. Jacob Schaefer Dr. Karen S. Coats Committee Chair Director of School Dean of the Graduate School May 2020 COPYRIGHT BY Jennifer L. Simpson 2020 Published by the Graduate School ABSTRACT Estuarine shorelines along the northern Gulf of Mexico are dynamic geologic settings that provide numerous ecological and economic benefits. By definition, estuaries are semi-enclosed bodies of water that receive sediment from two sources: (1) fluvial systems feeding into the estuary and (2) sediment transported by wave action and tidal currents from adjacent marine sources. Erosion of estuarine shorelines resulting from rising sea level, storm impact, and anthropogenic influence has been increasingly evident in the microtidal Gulf Coast over recent decades. This study collects quantitative and qualitative data to better understand sedimentary dynamics associated with contemporary estuarine shoreline erosion in Bon Secour Bay, Alabama and Perdido Bay, Florida. Historical aerial imagery compared with modern imagery indicates an average land loss rate of 0.30 – 0.67 m yr-1 at Bon Secour Bay (1992–2018) and 0.55 m yr-1 at Perdido Bay (1994–2018). Selection of these two sites is based on their similar microtidal, sandy, forested, undeveloped, northwest-to-southeast trending shorelines; albeit Bon Secour Bay has a considerably longer fetch and greater fluvial sediment input as it is part of the greater Mobile Bay estuarine system. Particle size of five nearshore sediment cores (~0.75 – 1.00 m below seafloor) are dominated by fine- to medium-grained sand with intervals of very fine and coarse sand and silt (rare). Sedimentological characteristics of nearshore cores and surface sediment suggest eroding shorelines are being directly deposited to the nearshore. Occurrences of shell material, wood fragments, coarser particles, and reduced sorting quality at the base of some core locations indicate facies change and possible ravinement surfaces that have been buried by sediment from a Holocene transgression. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express great appreciation to my committee chair and advisor, Dr. Frank Heitmuller, whose guidance and encouragement through this thesis has been irreplaceable. His positive attitude and unwavering willingness to help me through this challenging process has been a lesson in and of itself that I will take with me into my future ventures. I would also like to extend my gratitude to my committee members, Dr. Mark Puckett, Dr. Andy Reese, and Dr. Davin Wallace, whose collective generosity of equipment, advice, and extensive knowledge in their respective fields have contributed to the development and success of this project. Additionally, I would like to thank Dr. Scott Phipps and Shannon Walker from Weeks Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve; and Arthur Stiles with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for their help in the facilitation of site locations for this project. I am also thankful for the support and camaraderie of the faculty and fellow students in the geology department at the University of Southern Mississippi. Finally, I am grateful for the inspiration, motivation, and confidence I unrelentingly received from my family and friends throughout this journey. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................ ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................. iii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................. ix LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ............................................................................................. xi CHAPTER I – INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Research Questions ................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Hypothesis................................................................................................................. 5 1.4 Thesis Scope ............................................................................................................. 6 CHAPTER II – LITERATURE REVIEW ......................................................................... 8 2.1 Geologic Setting........................................................................................................ 8 2.2 Depositional History ............................................................................................... 11 2.3 Climate .................................................................................................................... 12 2.4 Transgressive Systems Tract................................................................................... 13 2.5 Estuary Model ......................................................................................................... 14 2.6 Previous work ......................................................................................................... 17 2.6.1 Cedar Island, North Carolina ........................................................................... 17 2.6.2 Chesapeake Bay, Maryland ............................................................................. 18 CHAPTER III – STUDY AREA ...................................................................................... 20 iv 3.1 General Study Area ................................................................................................. 20 3.1.2 Bon Secour Bay ............................................................................................... 21 3.1.3 Perdido Bay ...................................................................................................... 24 CHAPTER IV – METHODOLOGY ................................................................................ 27 4.1 Preliminary Assessments Using Aerial Imagery .................................................... 27 4.2 Field Sampling and Data Collection ....................................................................... 30 4.2.1 Sample Locations ............................................................................................. 30 4.2.2 Nearshore Sediment Cores ............................................................................... 31 4.2.3 Piezometers ...................................................................................................... 36 4.2.4 Bottom Sediment Samples ............................................................................... 42 4.2.5 Erosion Pins ..................................................................................................... 45 4.3 Laboratory Analyses ............................................................................................... 47 4.3.1 Sediment Particle Size ..................................................................................... 48 4.3.2 Organic Matter ................................................................................................. 49 4.3.3 Calcium Carbonate........................................................................................... 49 4.3.4 Magnetic Susceptibility ................................................................................... 49 4.4 Statistical Analysis .................................................................................................. 51 CHAPTER V – RESULTS ............................................................................................... 52 5.1 Laboratory Results .................................................................................................. 52 5.1.1 Nearshore sediment cores ................................................................................ 52 v 5.1.1.2 BSB-C-01-1 .............................................................................................. 53 5.1.1.3 BSB-C-01-2 .............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 COLA
    Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 COL Application Part 2 — FSAR SUBSECTION 2.4.1: HYDROLOGIC DESCRIPTION TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.4 HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING ..................................................................2.4.1-1 2.4.1 HYDROLOGIC DESCRIPTION ............................................................2.4.1-1 2.4.1.1 Site and Facilities .....................................................................2.4.1-1 2.4.1.2 Hydrosphere .............................................................................2.4.1-3 2.4.1.3 References .............................................................................2.4.1-12 2.4.1-i Revision 6 Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 COL Application Part 2 — FSAR SUBSECTION 2.4.1 LIST OF TABLES Number Title 2.4.1-201 East Miami-Dade County Drainage Subbasin Areas and Outfall Structures 2.4.1-202 Summary of Data Records for Gage Stations at S-197, S-20, S-21A, and S-21 Flow Control Structures 2.4.1-203 Monthly Mean Flows at the Canal C-111 Structure S-197 2.4.1-204 Monthly Mean Water Level at the Canal C-111 Structure S-197 (Headwater) 2.4.1-205 Monthly Mean Flows in the Canal L-31E at Structure S-20 2.4.1-206 Monthly Mean Water Levels in the Canal L-31E at Structure S-20 (Headwaters) 2.4.1-207 Monthly Mean Flows in the Princeton Canal at Structure S-21A 2.4.1-208 Monthly Mean Water Levels in the Princeton Canal at Structure S-21A (Headwaters) 2.4.1-209 Monthly Mean Flows in the Black Creek Canal at Structure S-21 2.4.1-210 Monthly Mean Water Levels in the Black Creek Canal at Structure S-21 2.4.1-211 NOAA
    [Show full text]
  • Seagrass Integrated Mapping and Monitoring for the State of Florida Mapping and Monitoring Report No. 1
    Yarbro and Carlson, Editors SIMM Report #1 Seagrass Integrated Mapping and Monitoring for the State of Florida Mapping and Monitoring Report No. 1 Edited by Laura A. Yarbro and Paul R. Carlson Jr. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute St. Petersburg, Florida March 2011 Yarbro and Carlson, Editors SIMM Report #1 Yarbro and Carlson, Editors SIMM Report #1 Table of Contents Authors, Contributors, and SIMM Team Members .................................................................. 3 Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................... 4 Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 7 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 31 How this report was put together ........................................................................................... 36 Chapter Reports ...................................................................................................................... 41 Perdido Bay ........................................................................................................................... 41 Pensacola Bay .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Friends of Perdido Bay ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 10738 Lillian Highway Pensacola, FL 32506 850-453-5488
    Bulk Rate U.S. Postage Paid Permit No. 1013 Foley, AL 36535 Friends of Perdido Bay ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 10738 Lillian Highway Pensacola, FL 32506 850-453-5488 Tidings The Newsletter of the Friends of Perdido Bay . July/August 2012 Volume 25 Number 4 Jackie Lane - Editor www.friendsofperdidobay.com What A Difference Dilution Makes With the deluge the Pensacola area experienced on June 9th, the drought that was plaguing this area, was finally broken in a big way. Thirteen to 20 inches fell in one day at certain areas close to the bay. Less rain fell in the northern part of the watershed. The few rains we have had this past Spring were not really sufficient to break the year long drought. Before the June 9th rain, the Perdido River was at very low flow. Any type of man-made pollution entering Perdido Bay would not get sufficient dilution and toxic substances (what ever they are) would increase in the bay. This is especially true of paper mill effluent from International Paper, which during times of low flow of the Perdido River, can constitute one-fifth of the flow of the Perdido River. Because of the very concentrated pollution of paper mill effluent, especially high levels of organic chemicals and organic nitrogen, paper mill effluent needs to be greatly diluted in order not to cause harm. This spring there was a dearth of life in the bay. A 2-liter plastic bottle placed in the upper bay, had no barnacles growing on it after three weeks in the bay.
    [Show full text]
  • 12. Gulf Islands National Seashore
    The massive fort and surrounding trails cuckoos and hairy woodpeckers along offer a great vantage point for viewing the Chain of Lakes Trail. The Hutton sentinel flycatchers, gray kingbirds, Unit nearby is worth a stop to hear Tennessee, Cape May and magnolia the song of Bachman’s sparrows, and warblers. Fallouts can be seen in April the Three Notch Road site is perfect as migrants reach land for the first time. for sighting a red-headed woodpecker. Photo by David Moynahan 8 a.m. to sunset. Far western end of Free binoculars and field guides Fort Pickens Rd. (850) 934-2600, nps. are available. Dawn to dusk. 7720 org/guis Deaton Bridge Rd., (850) 983-5363, floridastateparks.org 12. Gulf Islands National Feathery Finds Seashore: Naval Osprey: Known as Florida’s fishing Live Oaks. The eagles, osprey have a distinct M wing national park’s shape and make their habitat near visitor center on brackish estuaries where they can scan Santa Rosa Sound the surface for fish. Osprey mate for is also a prime spot life – birds of a feather really do stay for sighting goldeneye, scaup, ducks, together! black-and-white warblers. 8 a.m. to sunset. 1801 Gulf Breeze Pkwy., (850) Brown Pelican: A symbol 934-2600, nps.org/guis of the Gulf Coast, the brown pelican is making A 1.5-mile loop trail 13. Garcon Point. a comeback. These runs through live oaks and picturesque water birds weigh 6-7 wetland. Wet prairie sparrows such as pounds and have a Henslow’s and LeConte’s can be seen 7-foot wingspan.
    [Show full text]
  • Community-Based Watershed Plan
    Perdido Bay Community-Based Watershed Plan The Nature Conservancy in Florida December 2014 Photo © Beth Maynor Young The Nature Conservancy would like to thank all of the stakeholders from local, state and federal governments, non-governmental organizations, community groups, businesses, and citizens who devoted their time, resources and support for this watershed planning process. Your desire and commitment to come together in the spirit of building a watershed community that will achieve more together than individually has created a solid foundation and legacy of collaboration and conservation for the Gulf. In particular, we would like to recognize the National Resource Conservation Service for their support in creating the GIS-based project maps and the leadership demonstrated by the counties in the Panhandle and Springs Coast regions to invest in a process that reaches across political and organizational boundaries and focuses on improving and protecting the watersheds today and for future generations. Copyright © 2015. The Nature Conservancy in Florida Table of Contents Executive Summary 2 Introduction 4 Planning Process 5 Identifying Priority Issues, Root Causes, Major Actions 7 Project Identification and Performance Measurement 9 Current Status and Recommended Next Steps 13 TNC Recommendations 14 Path Forward 14 Appendices 1 A—Deepwater Horizon Related Funding Opportunities 16 B—Stakeholder Participants 19 C—Stakeholder Meeting Notes 24 D—Watershed Overview and General Issues 58 E—Stakeholder-Identified Priority Issues, Root Causes, Major Actions and Project Types 65 F—Project Table 71 The Nature Conservancy Executive Summary The Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill has focused attention on opportunities to restore and enhance Gulf Coast ecosystems and communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Response Characteristics of the Perdido and Wolf Bay System to Inflows and Sea Level Rise
    British Journal of Environment & Climate Change 3(2): 229-256, 2013 SCIENCEDOMAIN international www.sciencedomain.org Response Characteristics of the Perdido and Wolf Bay System to Inflows and Sea Level Rise Janesh Devkota1, Xing Fang1* and Victoria Z. Fang2 1Department of Civil Engineering, Auburn University, Alabama 36849, USA. 2Auburn High School, 405 South Dean Road, Auburn, Alabama 36830, USA. Authors’ contributions Authors collaborated together for the completion of this work. Author JD designed the study, developed and calibrated the Perdido EFDC model, ran the model for all cases, performed data analyses of model results and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Author XF provided valuable instructions on study design, supervised the data analyses, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. Author VZF contributed by revising and improving the manuscript and interpreting model results due to the sea level rise. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Received 1st March 2013 st Research Article Accepted 1 June 2013 Published 20th August 2013 ABSTRACT The Perdido and Wolf Bay system in Alabama, USA, is an estuarine system linking the freshwater from the Perdido and Wolf Bay watersheds and the tidal saltwater from the Gulf of Mexico through Perdido Pass, Dolphin Pass, and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. A three dimensional hydrodynamic model using Environmental Fluid Dynamics Code (EFDC) was developed and used to analyze complex and dynamic flow, salinity, and temperature distributions in the system. The external driving forces for the model include the river discharges from natural and urban watersheds, atmospheric winds, and astronomical tidal elevations at the open boundaries where flow exchange takes place.
    [Show full text]
  • Perdido River and Bay Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan
    Perdido River and Bay Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan November 2017 Program Development Series 17-07 Northwest Florida Water Management District Perdido River and Bay Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan November 2017 Program Development Series 17-07 NORTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT GOVERNING BOARD George Roberts Jerry Pate John Alter Chair, Panama City Vice Chair, Pensacola Secretary-Treasurer, Malone Gus Andrews Jon Costello Marc Dunbar DeFuniak Springs Tallahassee Tallahassee Ted Everett Nick Patronis Bo Spring Chipley Panama City Beach Port St. Joe Brett J. Cyphers Executive Director Headquarters 81 Water Management Drive Havana, Florida 32333-4712 (850) 539-5999 Crestview Econfina Milton 180 E. Redstone Avenue 6418 E. Highway 20 5453 Davisson Road Crestview, Florida 32539 Youngstown, FL 32466 Milton, FL 32583 (850) 683-5044 (850) 722-9919 (850) 626-3101 Perdido River and Bay SWIM Plan Northwest Florida Water Management District Acknowledgements This document was developed by the Northwest Florida Water Management District under the auspices of the Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) Program and in accordance with sections 373.451-459, Florida Statutes. The plan update was prepared under the supervision and oversight of Brett Cyphers, Executive Director and Carlos Herd, Director, Division of Resource Management. Funding support was provided by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation’s Gulf Environmental Benefit Fund. The assistance and support of the NFWF is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would like to especially recognize members of the public, as well as agency reviewers and staff from the District and from the Ecology and Environment, Inc., team that contributed to the development of this plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Baldwin County Storm Surge Atlas
    Baldwin County Hurricane Surge Atlas Baldwin County Emergency Management Agency 23100 McAuliffe Drive Robertsdale, Alabama 36567 251-972-6807 INTRODUCTION Storm Surge Storm surge is simply water that is pushed toward the shore by the force of the winds swirling around the storm. This adyancing surge combines with the normal tides to create the hurricane storm tide, which can increase the mean water level 15 feet or more. In addition, wind driven waves are superimposed on the storm tide. This rise in water level can cause severe flooding in coastal areas, particularly when the storm tide coincides with the normal high tides. Because much of the United States' densely populated Atlantic and Gulf Coast coastlines lie less than 10 feet above mean sea level, the danger from storm tides is tremendous. The level of surge in a particular area is also determined by the slope of the continental shelf. A shallow slope off the coast will allow a greater surge to inundate coastal communities. Communities with a steeper continental shelf bottom will not see as much surge inundation, although large breaking waves can still present major problems. Storm tides, waves, and currents in confined harbors severely damage ships, marinas, and pleasure boats. In general, the more intense the storm, and the closer a community is to the right-front quadrant, the larger the area that must be evacuated. The problem is always the uncertainty about how intense the storm will be when if finally makes landfall. Emergency managers and local officials balance that uncertainty with the human and economic risks to their community.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Burial Mounds and Shellheaps Near Pensacola, Florida
    [From the Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Detroit Meeting, August, 1875.] Indian Burial Mounds and Shellheaps near Pensacola, Florida. By G. M. Sternberg, Surgeon U. S. Army. Having recently devoted some time to the exploration of two Indian burial mounds in the vicinity of Pensacola, Florida, I propose to put upon record the results of my explorations as a contribution to American Arclneology. 5 Inque dies magis in montem succedere silvas (Jogebant, infraque locum concedere cultis; Prata, lacus, rivos, segetes, vinetaque laeta Collibus et campis ut haberent. Lucr. De Re. Nat. V, 1369. (282) 283 B. NATURAL HISTORY. One of these mounds is in Alabama, and is situated upon the extremity of a peninsula formed by two arms of the Perdido Bay. This bay and the river of the same name form the boundary be- tween the states of Alabama and Florida. I shall call this the Bear Point Mound as the peninsula upon which it is situated is known by this name. The second mound is in Florida, about fifty miles east of Bear Point, and is also on a peninsula; formed by Pensacola Bay on the one side and Santa Rosa Sound on the other. There is reason to suppose, as I shall presently show, that these mounds were built by different, but contemporaneous, tribes of Indians, and it is quite probable that these tribes were hostile to each other. This I infer from the fact that their villages, the locations of which are shown by extensive shell-heaps (kjokkenmoddings), are situated upon peninsulas, and so located that hostile parties from either one would be unable to approach the other except in canoes, or by an exceedingly difficult and circuitous land route.
    [Show full text]
  • Pensacola and Perdido Bays Estuary Program Interlocal Agreement
    PENSACOLA AND PERDIDO BAYS ESTUARY PROGRAM INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT This Interlocal Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement”) is executed and made effective by and among: Escambia County, Santa Rosa County, and Okaloosa County, political subdivisions of the State of Florida; Baldwin County, a political subdivision of the State of Alabama (hereinafter referred to as the “Counties”); City of Gulf Breeze, City of Milton, City of Pensacola, and Town of Century, municipal corporations of the State of Florida; and City of Orange Beach, a municipal corporation of the State of Alabama (hereinafter referred to as the “Cities”) (each being at times referred to as “Party” or “Parties”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Florida Parties are authorized by Section 163.01, Florida Statutes, et seq., to enter into interlocal agreements and thereby cooperatively utilize their powers and resources in the most efficient and economical manner possible; and WHEREAS, the City of Orange Beach is an Alabama Class 8 municipality vested with a portion of the state’s sovereign power to protect the public health, safety, and welfare pursuant to Alabama Code §11-45-1 et seq. (1975), and has specific authority to enter into contracts with counties and municipal corporations for the joint exercise of their powers and resources pursuant to Alabama Code §11-102-1 et seq. (1975); and WHEREAS, Baldwin County is a political subdivision of the State of Alabama which is vested with certain authority as provided by state law, which includes the authority to provide for and
    [Show full text]
  • Gulf of Mexic O
    292 ¢ U.S. Coast Pilot 5, Chapter 6 Chapter 5, Pilot Coast U.S. Chart Coverage in Coast Pilot 5—Chapter 6 87°W 86°W 85°W NOAA’s Online Interactive Chart Catalog has complete chart coverage http://www.charts.noaa.gov/InteractiveCatalog/nrnc.shtml ALABAMA 88°W 31°N GEORGIA Milton Pensacola FLORIDA Fort Walton Beach CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY PERDIDO BAY 11385 11383 11390 Panama City 11406 11384 11382 11392 11405 11391 11388 11 30°N 39 APALACHEE BAY 3 Port St. Joe AY Apalachicola B LA ICO ACH AL AP 11402 11404 11389 GULF OF MEXICO 11401 29°N 19 SEP2021 19 SEP 2021 U.S. Coast Pilot 5, Chapter 6 ¢ 293 Apalachee Bay to Mobile Bay (18) METEOROLOGICAL TABLE – COASTAL AREA OFF PENSACOLA, FLORIDA Between 27°N to 31°N and 86°W to 89°W YEARS OF WEATHER ELEMENTS JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC RECORD Wind > 33 knots ¹ 1.3 1.2 0.7 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 Wave Height > 9 feet ¹ 4.5 3.8 3.4 1.8 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.7 3.0 2.9 3.3 3.3 2.3 Visibility < 2 nautical miles ¹ 1.7 1.4 2.2 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.9 Precipitation ¹ 5.0 4.9 3.9 2.8 2.8 3.0 4.0 4.1 4.9 3.9 3.6 4.0 3.9 Temperature > 69° F 26.8 25.9 36.8 64.3 95.2 99.8 99.9 99.9 98.9 89.4 60.4 37.0 71.8 Mean Temperature (°F) 64.6 64.9 67.6 71.8 77.1 81.5 83.4 83.4 81.5 76.6 70.8 66.5 74.7 Temperature < 33° F ¹ 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Mean RH (%) 77 77 78 78 79 78 77 77 78 74 75 75 77 Overcast or Obscured ¹ 27.2 25.5 22.1 15.6 12.4 10.1 11.4 11.5 16.5 13.8 17.5 22.0 16.8 Mean Cloud Cover (8ths) 4.8 4.6 4.3 3.7 3.6 3.7 4.1 4.2 4.4 3.9 4.1 4.6 4.2 Mean SLP (mbs) 1020 1019 1017 1017 1016 1016 1017 1016 1015 1016 1019 1020 1017 Ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Community-Based Watershed Plan
    Perdido Bay Community-Based Watershed Plan The Nature Conservancy in Florida December 2014 Photo © Beth Maynor Young The Nature Conservancy would like to thank all of the stakeholders from local, state and federal governments, NGOs, community groups and citizens who devoted their time, resources and support for this watershed planning process. Your desire and commitment to come together in the spirit of building a watershed community that will achieve more together than individually has created a solid foundation and legacy of collaboration and conservation for the Gulf. In particular, we would like to recognize the leadership demonstrated by the county governments in the Panhandle and Springs Coast to invest in a process that reaches across political and organizational boundaries and focuses on improving and protecting the watersheds today and for future generations. Copyright © 2015. The Nature Conservancy in Florida Table of Contents Executive Summary 2 Introduction 4 Planning Process 5 Identifying Priority Issues, Root Causes, Major Actions 7 Project Identification and Performance Measurement 9 Current Status and Recommended Next Steps 13 TNC Recommendations 14 Path Forward 14 Appendices 1 A—Deepwater Horizon Related Funding Opportunities 16 B—Stakeholder Participants 19 C—Stakeholder Meeting Notes 24 D—Watershed Overview and General Issues 58 E—Stakeholder-Identified Priority Issues, Root Causes, Major Actions and Project Types 65 F—Project Table 71 The Nature Conservancy Executive Summary The Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill has focused attention on opportunities to restore and enhance Gulf Coast ecosystems and communities. In Florida, funding opportunities associated with civil and criminal settlements of the Deepwater Horizon Spill provide an opportunity to address direct damage from the spill as well as long-standing water quality, habitat and coastal resilience restoration needs.
    [Show full text]