Composition of Cytoplasm
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Physical and Chemical Basis of Cytoplasmic Streaming
Annual Reviews www.annualreviews.org/aronline .4n~t Rev. Plant Physiol 1981. 32:205-36 Copyright© 1981by AnnualReviews In~ All rights reserved PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL BASIS OF CYTOPLASMIC ~7710 STREAMING Nobur6 Kamiya Department of Cell Biology, National Institute for Basic Biology, Okazaki, 444 Japan CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 206 SHUTI’LE STREAMINGIN THE MYXOMYCETEPLASMODIUM ................ 207 General...................................................................................................................... 207 ContractileProperties of the PlasmodialStrand ...................................................... 208 Activationcaused by stretching .................................................................................. 208 Activationcaused by loading .................................................................................... 209 Synchronizationof local ,hythms .............................................................................. 209 ContractileProteins .................................................................................................. 210 Plasmodiumactomyosin .......................................................................................... 210 Plusmodiummyosin ................................................................................................ 210 Plusmodiumactin.................................................................................................... 211 -
Overview of the Cytoskeleton from an Evolutionary Perspective
Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on October 1, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Overview of the Cytoskeleton from an Evolutionary Perspective Thomas D. Pollard1 and Robert D. Goldman2 1Departments of Molecular Cellular and Developmental Biology, Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, and Cell Biology ,Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8103 2Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60611 Correspondence: [email protected] SUMMARY Organisms in the three domains of life depend on protein polymers to form a cytoskeleton that helps to establish their shapes, maintain their mechanical integrity, divide, and, in many cases, move. Eukaryotes have the most complex cytoskeletons, comprising three cytoskeletal poly- mers—actin filaments, intermediate filaments, and microtubules—acted on by three families of motor proteins (myosin, kinesin, and dynein). Prokaryotes have polymers of proteins ho- mologous to actin and tubulin but no motors, and a few bacteria have a protein related to intermediate filament proteins. Outline 1 Introduction—Overview of cellular 4 Overview of the evolution of the cytoskeleton functions 5 Conclusion 2 Structures of the cytoskeletal polymers References 3 Assembly of cytoskeletal polymers Editors: Thomas D. Pollard and Robert D. Goldman Additional Perspectives on The Cytoskeleton available at www.cshperspectives.org Copyright # 2018 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; all rights reserved; doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a030288 Cite this article as Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2018;10:a030288 1 Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on October 1, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press T.D. Pollard and R.D. Goldman 1 INTRODUCTION—OVERVIEW OF CELLULAR contrast, intermediate filaments do not serve as tracks for FUNCTIONS molecular motors (reviewed by Herrmann and Aebi 2016) but, rather, are transported by these motors. -
Some Considerations of Protoplasm
THE OHIO JOURNAL OF SCIENCE VOL. XXV MAY, 1925 No. 3 SOME CONSIDERATIONS OF PROTOPLASM. BRUCE FINK, Department of Botany, Miami University. One of the most fundamental problems in biological science is that which concerns protoplasm. Yet there is great diver- sity of opinion among biologists regarding what constitutes protoplasm and some doubt whether the term protoplasm is really worth retaining. In the present state of knowledge, protoplasm can not be defined in any terms of physical structure which will be accepted, without qualification, by a majority of botanists, and can only be defined somewhat more satis- factorily in terms of colloidal chemistry. Again, though chemi- cal definition is somewhat more certain than physical, this alone is far from satisfactory to those who think of cell con- tents in terms of microscopic structure. It is sometimes stated by certain biologists that proto- plasm is essentially alike in all organism. This may be true in the rough if we define in purely chemical terms; or if we content ourselves with the statement that protoplasm is the living substance of the cell, knowing not how much of the cell is alive, and, therefore, protoplasm. Turning to those very lowly organized plants, the bacteria, most of us will agree that the whole cell content, inclusive or exclusive of the vacuoles, composes the protoplasm. For higher fungi and for animals the situation is about the same, except that definite nuclei here replace the nuclear granules commonly supposed to exist in bacteria. Turning attention to higher green plants, we find that the cells are much more complex with respect to visible contents. -
The Cell-Theory: a Restatement, History, and Critique Part III
*57 The Cell-theory: A Restatement, History, and Critique Part III. The Cell as a Morphological Unit By JOHN R. BAKER (From the Department of Zoology and Comparative Anatomy, Oxford) SUMMARY A long time elapsed after the discovery of cells before they came to be generally regarded as morphological units. As a first step it was necessary to show that the cell-walls of plants were double and that cells could therefore be separated. The earliest advances in this direction were made by Treviranus (1805) and Link (1807). The idea of a cell was very imperfect, however, so long as attention was con- centrated on its wall. The first person who stated clearly that the cell-wall is not a necessary constituent was Leydig (1857). Subsequently the cell came to be regarded as a naked mass of protoplasm with a nucleus, and to this unit the name of protoplast was given. The true nature of the limiting membrane of the protoplast was discovered by Overton (1895). The plasmodesmata or connective strands that sometimes connect cells were prob- ably first seen by Hartig, in sieve-plates (1837). They are best regarded from the point of view of their functions in particular cases. They do not provide evidence for the view that the whole of a multicellular organism is basically a protoplasmic unit. Two or more nuclei in a continuous mass of protoplasm appear to have been seen for the first time in 1802, by Bauer. That an organism may consist wholly of a syn- cytium was discovered in i860, in the Mycetozoa. -
Intelligent Behaviors of Amoeboid Movement Based on Complex Dynamics of Soft Matter
REVIEW www.rsc.org/softmatter | Soft Matter Intelligent behaviors of amoeboid movement based on complex dynamics of soft matter Toshiyuki Nakagakiab and Robert D. Guyc Received 25th April 2007, Accepted 26th September 2007 First published as an Advance Article on the web 2nd November 2007 DOI: 10.1039/b706317m We review how soft matter is self-organized to perform information processing at the cell level by examining the model organism Physarum plasmodium. The amoeboid organism, Physarum polycephalum, in the class of true slime molds, exhibits the intelligent behavior of foraging in complex situations. When placed in a maze with food sources at two exits, the organism develops tubular structures with its body which connect the food sources along the shortest path so that the rates of nutrient absorption and intracellular communication are maximized. This intelligent behavior results from the organism’s control of a dynamic network through which mechanical and chemical information is transmitted. We review experimental studies that explore the development and adaptation of structures that make up the network. Recently a model of the dynamic network has been developed, and we review the formulation of this model and present some key results. The model captures the dynamics of existing networks, but it does not answer the question of how such networks form initially. To address the development of cell shape, we review existing mechanochemical models of the protoplasm of Physarum, present more general models of motile cells, and discuss how to adapt existing models to explore the development of intelligent networks in Physarum. 1. Introduction: intelligence at the cell level From a material science point of view, the cell is an exotic system in which nonliving materials act together to The cell is the elementary unit of all organisms. -
The Mechanics of Motility in Dissociated Cytoplasm
THE MECHANICS OF MOTILITY IN DISSOCIATED CYTOPLASM MICAH DEMBO Theoretical Biophysics, Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Group T-10, Mail Stop K710, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 ABSTRACT We stimulate the dynamical behavior of dissociated cytoplasm using the Reactive Flow Model (Dembo, M., and F. Harlow, 1986, Biophys. J., 50:109-121). We find that for the most part the predicted dynamical behavior of the cytoplasm is governed by three nondimensional numbers. Several other nondimensional parameters, the initial conditions, and boundary conditions are found to have lesser effects. Of the three major nondimensional parameters, one (D#) controls the percentage of ectoplasm, the second (CO) controls the sharpness of the endoplasm-ectoplasm boundary, and the third (R#) controls the topological complexity of the endoplasm-ectoplasm distribution. If R# is very small, then the cytoplasm contracts into a single uniform mass, and there is no bulk streaming. If R# is very large, then the cytoplasmic mass breaks up into a number of clumps scattered throughout the available volume. Between these clumps the solution undergoes turbulent or chaotic patterns of streaming. Intermediate values of R# can be found such that the mass of cytoplasm remains connected and yet undergoes coherent modes of motility similar to flares (Taylor, D.L., J.S. Condeelis, P.L. Moore, and R.D. Allen, 1973, J. Cell Biol., 59:378-394) and rosettes (Kuroda, K., 1979, Cell Motility: Molecules and Organization, 347-362). INTRODUCTION (Dembo et al., 1986). Here we will consider two experi- in which chemical reaction is an essential The reactive flow model is a putative description of motile mental systems fluid part of the dynamics. -
Bathybius Haeckelii and the Psychology of Scientific Discovery
NICOLAAS A. RUPKE BATHYBIUS HAECKELII AND THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERY THEORY INSTEAD OF OBSERVED DATA CONTROLLED THE LATE 19th CENTURY ‘DISCOVERY’ OF A PRIMITIVE FORM OF LIFE THE TRADITIONAL image of the scientist as an objective fact finder has become seriously tarnished by recent work in the history and philosophy of science. ’ It is argued that the growth of science is not always brought about by a reasoned debate based on objective evidence. Instead, scientific discovery seems to be controlled quite as much by certain psychological factors such as respect for a theoretical superstructure. The debate around T. S. Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions has brought similar iconoclastic aspects of scientific conduct to the attention of a cross section of the scholarly community.’ Without wanting to enter into the controversy generated by Kuhn’s book,3 this paper records one of the better examples from the annals of science to show how respect for a theoretical superstructure brought about a fictitious discovery. Specifically, it records how confidence in the heuristic value of evolutionary theory in the second half of the 19th century produced the discovery of a fictitious primitive form of life, called Bathybius, its sub-division into two genera, its reported occur- rence over vast regions of the ocean floor, its identification in the geologic record, and its wide acceptance in the life and earth sciences for the period of almost a decade. Background to the ‘Discovery’ Shortly after the publication of Darwin’s The Ongin of Species (1859), 1 See review paper by S. G. -
Whence Protoplasm?
The Virginia Teacher VOLUME XII JANUARY, 1931 NUMBER 1 WHENCE PROTOPLASM? ture, we will consider for a little the pos- sible ways in which these particular ele- IN THE Virginia Teacher for No- ments may have come to be associated to- vember, 1929, the author sketched in gether as living systems. bold outlines the progress of animal The greatest contribution of science has life on the earth. The present article deals been to establish that all phenomena of with the nature and origin of protoplasm. nature proceed in an orderly fashion, fol- It is impossible to give the sources for much lowing certain fixed laws. The behavior of of what follows. They have been too long protoplasm is no exception to this prin- part and parcel of a teaching equipment. ciple. We are accustomed to thinking of However, it may be said that the treatment the universe as being comprised of two of the subject as found in Osborn's Origin things, matter and energy. The work of and Evolution of Life has furnished a par- the last decade or so on the nature and ticular inspiration for much of what fol- structure of the atom seems to indicate that lows. after all there is but one thing in nature, Ever since Purkinje first used the term and that this thing is energy. Matter, "protoplasm," as a name for living sub- viewed in this light, is but an expression of stance, its nature has been a subject of ab- various energy relationships. However this sorbing interest. It is not strange that its may be, we usually think of energy as being unique properties fostered the idea that it of two kinds, potential or stored energy, must have had a supernatural origin, that and kinetic or active energy. -
Cell & Molecular Biology
BSC ZO- 102 B. Sc. I YEAR CELL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY SCHOOL OF SCIENCES UTTARAKHAND OPEN UNIVERSITY BSCZO-102 Cell and Molecular Biology DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY SCHOOL OF SCIENCES UTTARAKHAND OPEN UNIVERSITY Phone No. 05946-261122, 261123 Toll free No. 18001804025 Fax No. 05946-264232, E. mail [email protected] htpp://uou.ac.in Board of Studies and Programme Coordinator Board of Studies Prof. B.D.Joshi Prof. H.C.S.Bisht Retd.Prof. Department of Zoology Department of Zoology DSB Campus, Kumaun University, Gurukul Kangri, University Nainital Haridwar Prof. H.C.Tiwari Dr.N.N.Pandey Retd. Prof. & Principal Senior Scientist, Department of Zoology, Directorate of Coldwater Fisheries MB Govt.PG College (ICAR) Haldwani Nainital. Bhimtal (Nainital). Dr. Shyam S.Kunjwal Department of Zoology School of Sciences, Uttarakhand Open University Programme Coordinator Dr. Shyam S.Kunjwal Department of Zoology School of Sciences, Uttarakhand Open University Haldwani, Nainital Unit writing and Editing Editor Writer Dr.(Ms) Meenu Vats Dr.Mamtesh Kumari , Professor & Head Associate. Professor Department of Zoology, Department of Zoology DAV College,Sector-10 Govt. PG College Chandigarh-160011 Uttarkashi (Uttarakhand) Dr.Sunil Bhandari Asstt. Professor. Department of Zoology BGR Campus Pauri, HNB (Central University) Garhwal. Course Title and Code : Cell and Molecular Biology (BSCZO 102) ISBN : 978-93-85740-54-1 Copyright : Uttarakhand Open University Edition : 2017 Published By : Uttarakhand Open University, Haldwani, Nainital- 263139 Contents Course 1: Cell and Molecular Biology Course code: BSCZO102 Credit: 3 Unit Block and Unit title Page number Number Block 1 Cell Biology or Cytology 1-128 1 Cell Type : History and origin. -
History of Microbiology: Spontaneous Generation Theory
HISTORY OF MICROBIOLOGY: SPONTANEOUS GENERATION THEORY Microbiology often has been defined as the study of organisms and agents too small to be seen clearly by the unaided eye—that is, the study of microorganisms. Because objects less than about one millimeter in diameter cannot be seen clearly and must be examined with a microscope, microbiology is concerned primarily with organisms and agents this small and smaller. Microbial World Microorganisms are everywhere. Almost every natural surface is colonized by microbes (including our skin). Some microorganisms can live quite happily in boiling hot springs, whereas others form complex microbial communities in frozen sea ice. Most microorganisms are harmless to humans. You swallow millions of microbes every day with no ill effects. In fact, we are dependent on microbes to help us digest our food and to protect our bodies from pathogens. Microbes also keep the biosphere running by carrying out essential functions such as decomposition of dead animals and plants. Microbes are the dominant form of life on planet Earth. More than half the biomass on Earth consists of microorganisms, whereas animals constitute only 15% of the mass of living organisms on Earth. This Microbiology course deals with • How and where they live • Their structure • How they derive food and energy • Functions of soil micro flora • Role in nutrient transformation • Relation with plant • Importance in Industries The microorganisms can be divided into two distinct groups based on the nucleus structure: Prokaryotes – The organism lacking true nucleus (membrane enclosed chromosome and nucleolus) and other organelles like mitochondria, golgi body, entoplasmic reticulum etc. are referred as Prokaryotes. -
Eukaryotic Cell Structure and Function: (Part 1)
Harriet Wilson, Lecture Notes Bio. Sci. 4 - Microbiology Sierra College Eukaryotic Cell Structure and Function: (Part 1) The science or study of cell structure and function is called cytology; but courses dealing with this topic frequently come under the heading of cell and molecular biology. Cytology has undergone extensive change over time. The term cell (cella = a small room) was first used by Robert Hooke (1665) with reference to an empty space or chamber (like a prison cell). Hooke was observing the cell walls of dead cork cells from the bark of cork oaks, and not living cells. We now know cells are far from empty spaces. According to the cell theory, as articulated by Matthias Schleiden and Theodor Schwann (1839), the cell is the basic unit of structure and function in all, living organisms. When first written, the cell theory indicated that living cells could arise spontaneously through abiogenesis, but experiments conducted by Louis Pasteur and others invalidated this concept. Instead, it is now recognized that all cells arise from preexisting cells, and that they carry hereditary information (DNA) that is passed from one generation to the next through cell division. Cells are currently divided into two types, Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic. The term karyon (karyon = nucleus) appears in both names, and is preceded by either pro, meaning before or eu meaning well or truly. Fossil and molecular evidence indicates that prokaryotic cells evolved first, and that the larger, nucleated cells evolved later. Some of the distinguishing features of these two cell types are outlined below. A typical prokaryotic cell (Before a nucleus): Does not contain a nucleus surrounded by a nuclear membrane or envelope. -
Structure and Development of the Egg of the Glossiphoniid Leech Theromyzon Rude: Characterization of Developmental Stages and Structure of the Early Uncleaved Egg
Development 100, 211-225 (1987) 211 Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 1987 Structure and development of the egg of the glossiphoniid leech Theromyzon rude: characterization of developmental stages and structure of the early uncleaved egg JUAN FERNANDEZ, NANCY OLEA and CECILIA MATTE Departamento de Biologia, Facultad de Ciendas, Untversidad de Chile, Casilla 653, Santiago, Chile Summary Some aspects of the reproductive biology of the meridional bands, during stage le, lead to accumu- glossiphoniid leech, Theromyzon rude, under labora- lation of ooplasm at both egg poles. In this manner, tory conditions, and the staging and structure of its the teloplasm or pole plasm forms. Completion of the uncleaved egg were studied. Sexually mature animals first cleavage furrow, by the end of stage If, is form breeding communities and fertilization occurs in preceded by dorsoventral flattening of the egg and the ovLsacs, presumably around the time of egg rearrangement of its teloplasm and perinuclear laying. Opposition may be postponed for hours or plasm. Structure of the early uncleaved egg has been days, but the eggs in the ovisacs remain blocked at studied with transmission and scanning electron mi- first meiotic metaphase. Development of the croscopy of intact or permeabilized preparations. The uncleaved egg, from the time of oviposit ion to com- plasmalemma forms numerous long and some short pletion of the first cleavage division, has been sub- microvilli evenly distributed across the egg surface. divided into six stages. At 20 °C, the six developmental The ectoplasm includes many vesicles, mitochondria, stages take 5-6 h. Characterization of' the stages is granules and an elaborate network of filament based on observations of both live and fixed/cleared bundles.