Chiltern Hundreds Area Is a Subdivision Developed Beginning in the Mid-1920S in the Southeast Corner of Weston

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chiltern Hundreds Area Is a Subdivision Developed Beginning in the Mid-1920S in the Southeast Corner of Weston Inventory No: WSN.AD Historic Name: Chiltern Hundreds Common Name: Address: City/Town: Weston Village/Neighborhood: Local No: Year Constructed: Architect(s): Shurcliff, Arthur Asahel Architectural Style(s): Use(s): Residential District Architecture; Community Planning; Landscape Significance: Architecture Area(s): Designation(s): Building Materials(s): The Massachusetts Historical Commission (MHC) has converted this paper record to digital format as part of ongoing projects to scan records of the Inventory of Historic Assets of the Commonwealth and National Register of Historic Places nominations for Massachusetts. Efforts are ongoing and not all inventory or National Register records related to this resource may be available in digital format at this time. The MACRIS database and scanned files are highly dynamic; new information is added daily and both database records and related scanned files may be updated as new information is incorporated into MHC files. Users should note that there may be a considerable lag time between the receipt of new or updated records by MHC and the appearance of related information in MACRIS. Users should also note that not all source materials for the MACRIS database are made available as scanned images. Users may consult the records, files and maps available in MHC's public research area at its offices at the State Archives Building, 220 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, open M-F, 9-5. Users of this digital material acknowledge that they have read and understood the MACRIS Information and Disclaimer (http://mhc-macris.net/macrisdisclaimer.htm) Data available via the MACRIS web interface, and associated scanned files are for information purposes only. THE ACT OF CHECKING THIS DATABASE AND ASSOCIATED SCANNED FILES DOES NOT SUBSTITUTE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS. IF YOU ARE REPRESENTING A DEVELOPER AND/OR A PROPOSED PROJECT THAT WILL REQUIRE A PERMIT, LICENSE OR FUNDING FROM ANY STATE OR FEDERAL AGENCY YOU MUST SUBMIT A PROJECT NOTIFICATION FORM TO MHC FOR MHC'S REVIEW AND COMMENT. You can obtain a copy of a PNF through the MHC web site (www.sec.state.ma.us/mhc) under the subject heading "MHC Forms." Commonwealth of Massachusetts Massachusetts Historical Commission 220 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, Massachusetts 02125 www.sec.state.ma.us/mhc This file was accessed on: Tuesday, January 9, 2018 at 3:51: PM Assessor's USGS Area Form numbers In Area FORM A - AREA Sheets Quad Letter Massachusetts Historical Commission |57,5H,64 Natick 220 Morrissey Blvd. Boston, Massachusetts 02125 Town: Weston Photograph: Place or Neighborhood: Name of Area: Chiltern Hundreds Present use: residential Construction Dates or Period: 1923-2003 Overall condition: excellent Major Intrusions & Alterations: none Acreage: 145 acres Photo Roll: Recorded by: Pamela W. Fox Organization: Photo Film No.: 24,25; 2-25 Weston Historical Commission Date: July 15, 2005 Sketch Map: (see attached sheet) ^CErVED AU3 1 2005 MASS. HIST. Com Architectural Description see continuation sheet: yes The Chiltern Hundreds Area is a subdivision developed beginning in the mid-1920s in the southeast corner of Weston. The area encompasses 104 houses on approximately 145 acres. A small section of the original subdivision is located across the town line in Wellesley and is not included in this form. Designed in the early 1920s by well-known landscape designer Arthur Shurtleff (later Shurcliff), Chiltern Hundreds is characterized by quiet curved streets laid out roughly in a fan-shape, with many roads leading toward the Wellesley Farms train station. The land slopes gently to the south and at its highest point is 300 feet above sea level. Ridgeway Road, the principal route through the subdivision, provides a convenient connection to Commonwealth Avenue, once the main automobile route into Boston. Lot sizes range from about 0.14 acre to three acres, with most less than one acre. Because of commonalities in house size, setback, massing and materials, the area has a visual unity and sense of place. Two Shingle-style nouses (153 Ridgeway Road and 64 OxBow Road) date from before the subdivision. The remainder of the houses in the Chiltern Hundreds Area were built between 1926 to 2003, with most dating before the mid-1950s. The most common house type is the Colonial Revival in all its manifestations, including Georgian, Federal, Dutch Colonial, Cape, and Garrison Colonials. Houses from the 1950s are generally Modem in style, most commonly one-story ranches with occasional split-level examples. The most common exterior materials are clapboard and wood shingles but brick, stone and stucco are also used. Some houses have been remodelled or demolished to make way for new, larger homes, but in general the area has remained largely intact. Historical Narrative see continuation sheet: yes Chiltern Hundreds was Weston's first large-scale subdivision. Charles Wells Hubbard, one of Weston's most influential and public-spirited estate owners, conceived the idea; and most of the subdivision was built on his land. To design the development, Hubbard chose Arthur Shurtleff (later Shurcliff), who was then in his forties and well established as a nationally-known landscape architect. Shurcliff s original plan shows his intention to establish a sense of community by setting aside land for recreation and schools; however, not all his ideas were implemented. Shurtleff s design for Chiltern Hundreds, with its curved streets, was influenced by the work of his first employer and mentor, Frederick Law Olmsted Sr. Bibliography and/or References see continuation sheet: no 1. Fox, Pamela W., Farm Town to Suburb: The History and Architecture of Weston, Massachusetts, 1830-1980 (Peter Randall Publisher, 2002). The Hubbard Estate chapter, p.501ff. 2. "Chiltern Hundreds," brochure dating to summer, 1926, distributed by Walter Channing, Realtor, Boston. Copy in Pam Fox files 3. Declaration of Trust, December, 1919, Middlesex County Registry of Deeds, So. District, Book 4316, Page 272 and Plan Book 279, Plan 29, December, 1919 Recommended as a National Register District: no Massachusetts Historical Commission Area AD 220 Morrisey Blvd. Boston, Massachusetts 02125 Architectural Description (continued) From the 1860s to the 1920s, most of the Chiltern Hundreds subdivision land belonged to the estate of Charles Townsend Hubbard and later his son, Charles Wells Hubbard, and was maintained as part of a large gentleman's farm. Both Hubbards subdivided off a few lots along Orchard Avenue (see Orchard Avenue Area, Form U) for relatives and friends, and in 1899, C. W. Hubbard subdivided off a lot on Ox Bow Road which he sold to S. F. Denton. Denton built a substantial shingle Colonial Revival house at 64 Ox Bow Rd (c. 1900, MHC 1076, Map #69). The house at 153 Ridgeway Rd (1881-83/1920s, MHC 1093, Map #86) also predates the subdivision but was not moved to its present location until the1920s. The central core of this shingle house was originally the maid's quarters (north wing) of the Shingle-style Hubbard mansion, Ridgehurst, at 80 Orchard Avenue (see Area Form U and MHC 378). Prominent landscape architect Arthur Shurtleff (later Shurcliff) planned the Chiltern Hundreds subdivision in the early 1920s, and sales commenced in 1925. The first Weston lots to be purchased were those closest to the Wellesley town line, within walking distance of the Wellesley Farms Station. The first houses were generally modest in size, but many were well-constructed of brick or stone, with slate roofs. Notable 1920s Colonial Revival examples include 17 Locust Road (c. 1926, MHC 1057, Map # 50), a brick comer house with slate roof and entrance entablature with fanlight and broken scroll pediment; and 23 Old Colony Road (c. 1929, MHC 1061, Map #54), a two-story brick Colonial Revival with a slate roof and central entrance portico. Clapboard and shingle Colonial Revivals, generally painted white, include 4 Chiltern Road. (c. 1926, MHC 1009, Map #3) a shingled two-story Colonial with a one-story porches at each gable end; 5 Chiltern Rd (c. 1926, MHC 1010, Map #4), a Garrison Colonial with overhang; 8 Locust Road (c. 1929, MHC 1055, Map #48); and 234 Ridgeway Road (c. 1926, MHC 1106, Map #99), a two-story center entrance Colonial Revival with semi-circular portico. The picturesque, asymmetrical Tudor style was used in the 1920s at 240 Ridgeway Road (c. 1927, MHC 1107, Map #100, Photo #1), a smalll/2 story brick and half-timbered cottage where the asphalt-shingled roof wraps around the roof edges to imitate the appearance of thatch. A tall brick chimney with three chimney pots sits atop the clipped gable roof. Other examples of 1920s brick Tudors include 53 Dean Road (c. 1928, MHC 1040, Map #33), 244 Ridgeway Road (c. 1929, MHC 1109, Map # 102) and the Marie and John Lawless Jr. House at 3 Pembroke Road (c. 1927, MHC 1082, Map # 75, Photo #2). The latter is prominently sited at the comer of Pembroke and Old Colony Roads and features a brick first floor and half-timbered second-floor cross gable. No. 11 Locust Road (c.1927, MHC 1056, Map #49) is a stucco Tudor with high pitched front- facing gable roof. No. 43 Ox Bow Road (c. 1926, MHC 1070, Map #63) is a stucco Tudor with a clipped gable roof; and the adjacent 45 Ox Bow Road (c.1926, MHC 1071, Map #64) is a brick Tudor with half-timbered sloping wings, a slate hip roof, and small pane casement windows Similar small houses were built during the early 1930s. The north side of Pembroke Road features nicely proportioned Colonial Revival houses at 29 Pembroke Road (c. 1935, MHC 1087, Map #80); 33 Pembroke Road (c. 1934, MHC 1090, Map # 83), a small brick Col. Rev. with slate roof, 12/8 windows, and a fanlight over the entrance doorway; 37 Pembroke Road (c.
Recommended publications
  • Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA District 1964-Present
    Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA district 1964-2021 By Jonathan Belcher with thanks to Richard Barber and Thomas J. Humphrey Compilation of this data would not have been possible without the information and input provided by Mr. Barber and Mr. Humphrey. Sources of data used in compiling this information include public timetables, maps, newspaper articles, MBTA press releases, Department of Public Utilities records, and MBTA records. Thanks also to Tadd Anderson, Charles Bahne, Alan Castaline, George Chiasson, Bradley Clarke, Robert Hussey, Scott Moore, Edward Ramsdell, George Sanborn, David Sindel, James Teed, and George Zeiba for additional comments and information. Thomas J. Humphrey’s original 1974 research on the origin and development of the MBTA bus network is now available here and has been updated through August 2020: http://www.transithistory.org/roster/MBTABUSDEV.pdf August 29, 2021 Version Discussion of changes is broken down into seven sections: 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA 2) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Eastern Mass. St. Ry. Co. Norwood Area Quincy Area Lynn Area Melrose Area Lowell Area Lawrence Area Brockton Area 3) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Middlesex and Boston St. Ry. Co 4) MBTA bus routes inherited from Service Bus Lines and Brush Hill Transportation 5) MBTA bus routes initiated by the MBTA 1964-present ROLLSIGN 3 5b) Silver Line bus rapid transit service 6) Private carrier transit and commuter bus routes within or to the MBTA district 7) The Suburban Transportation (mini-bus) Program 8) Rail routes 4 ROLLSIGN Changes in MBTA Bus Routes 1964-present Section 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) succeeded the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) on August 3, 1964.
    [Show full text]
  • Regionwide Suburban Transit Opportunities Study Phase II
    Regionwide Suburban Transit Opportunities Study Phase II A report produced by the Central Transportation Planning Staff for the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization Regionwide Suburban Transit Opportunities Study Phase II Project Manager Clinton Bench Authors Thomas J. Humphrey Heather Ostertog Contributing Staff Paul Reim Cartography Mary McShane Cover Design Jane M. Gillis Cover Photographs Carol Gautreau Bent Kenneth Dumas Central Transportation Planning Staff, directed by the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization. The MPO is com- posed of state and regional agencies and authorities, and local governments. December 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS.................................................................................................1 Overview...........................................................................................................................1 Suggested Routes .............................................................................................................2 Wellesley .........................................................................................................................2 Winchester.......................................................................................................................2 Westwood........................................................................................................................2 Canton..............................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • MBTA Tariff and Statement of Fare and Transfer Rules
    MBTA Tariff and Statement of Fare and Transfer Rules Adopted by the Fiscal and Management Control Board June 6, 2016 Effective July 1, 2016 Revised June 15, 2018 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 MBTA Fare Media ...................................................................................................................... 3 CharlieCard ............................................................................................................................ 3 CharlieTicket .......................................................................................................................... 5 Paper Tickets ......................................................................................................................... 6 Cash ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Commuter Checks and benefit cards ...................................................................................... 7 mTicket ................................................................................................................................... 7 MBTA Fare Vending and Validation ........................................................................................... 8 Fare Vending Machines .......................................................................................................... 8 On-board Fareboxes .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Route 9 Enhancement Study and Plan
    Route 9 Enhancement Study and Plan Inventory and Assessment of Existing Conditions December 2015 Prepared by Metropolitan Area Planning Council 60 Temple Place, 6th Floor Boston, Massachusetts 02111 Tel (617) 451-2770 www.mapc.org Prepared for The Town of Wellesley Planning Board Project Accreditation Alison Felix, AICP, Senior Transportation Planner Paul Dell’Aquila, AICP, Executive Director, MetroWest Regional Collaborative Susan Brunton, GIS Analyst II Hayley Oleksiak, Web Communications Intern Lydia Osborne, Communications Intern Francisco Rodriguez, Data Services Intern Eliza Wallace, PhD, GIS Analyst Route 9 Enhancement Study and Plan: Inventory and Assessment of Existing Conditions 2 Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 5 State Transportation Projects ............................................................................................................. 6 Current ............................................................................................................................................. 6 Planned ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Previous Planning Initiatives .............................................................................................................. 8 Key Planning Studies .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Investment Plan: 2017-2021
    2017-2021 Capital Investment Plan Letter from the Secretary & CEO On behalf of the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) and the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), I am pleased to present the 2017-2021 Capital Investment Plan (CIP). Shaped by careful planning and prioritization work as well as by public participation and comment, this plan represents a significant and sustained investment in the transportation infrastructure that serves residents and businesses across the Commonwealth. And it reflects a transformative departure from past CIPs as MassDOT and the MBTA work to reinvent capital planning for the Commonwealth’s statewide, multi-modal transportation system. This CIP contains a portfolio of strategic investments organized into three priority areas of descending importance: system reliability, asset modernization, and capacity expansion. These priorities form the foundation of not only this plan, but of a vision for MassDOT and the MBTA where all Massachusetts residents and businesses have access to safe and reliable transportation options. For the first time, formal evaluation and scoring processes were used in selecting which transportation investments to propose for construction over the next five years, with projects prioritized based on their ability to efficiently meet the strategic goals of the MassDOT agencies. The result is a higher level of confidence that capital resources are going to the most beneficial and cost-effective projects. The ultimate goal is for the Commonwealth to have a truly integrated and diversified transportation investment portfolio, not just a “capital plan.” Although the full realization of this reprioritization of capital investment will be an ongoing process and will evolve through several CIP cycles, this 2017-2021 Plan represents a major step closer to true performance-based capital planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Part Iii: Case Studies
    INFRASTRUCTURE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN METROPOLITAN BOSTON: A REGIONAL SURVEY PART III: CASE STUDIES This is Part III of Infrastructure and Economic Development in Metropolitan Boston: a Regional Survey. This study was commissioned by A Better City (ABC), with funding from The Boston Foundation. The research and writing was carried out by the consulting firm AECOM, with guidance from ABC staff and an Advisory Committee which ABC convened for this study. The study seeks to evaluate the state of public infrastructure investment in metropolitan Boston, particularly as it relates to the region’s potential for near- and longer-term economic development. Part I of the study provides a region-level overview of infrastructure issues. It summarizes and organizes a large body of relevant analysis conducted by others and adds current information on key initiatives and concerns. Part II provides development and infrastructure profiles for 25 areas defined by the study to represent the universe of region-scale economic development opportunities in metropolitan Boston, from the inner core to I-495. Each profile summarizes the key development opportunities and infrastructure needs of the area in question. The heart of the study is this Part III, a set of four geographic Case Studies, which explore in detail the interface of development and infrastructure issues in a diversity of settings. They include the inner core cluster of East Cambridge and East Somerville; the North Shore cities of Lynn, Salem, Beverly, and Peabody; the MetroWest towns of Framingham, Natick, and Ashland; and the I-495 town of Franklin. The study team gratefully acknowledges the insight and information provided by the municipal officials and private developers who agreed to be interviewed for this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Roadway Worker Protection Manual Effective January 1, 2015
    Roadway Worker Protection Manual Effective January 1, 2015 RWP REVISIONS Your comments on the Roadway Worker Protection Manual are invited. Please send all suggestions to: RWP Rewrite Committee Chief Engineer 32 Cobble Hill Rd. Somerville, MA 02143 Please include with each suggestion: Part # Subpart (letter) Subsection # Page # Recommended Changes, Corrections or Questions Submitted by: Name Address Phone Roadway Worker Protection Manual 1 1/1/2015 This page intentionally left blank. Roadway Worker Protection Manual 2 1/1/2015 ROADWAY WORKER PROTECTION MANUAL Table of Contents RWP DEFINITIONS (214.301) ..................................................................................................................... 5 NORAC DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................... 8 GENERAL INFORMATION ........................................................................................................................... 10 301. PURPOSE & SCOPE (214.301) ................................................................................................................................. 10 303. KEOLIS’S ON-TRACK SAFETY PROGRAM (214.303) ................................................................................................ 10 304. KEOLIS VISIBILITY PROTECTION ........................................................................................................................... 10 309. KEOLIS’S ON-TRACK SAFETY PROGRAM (2214.309) .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MBTA Reports Rise in Crimes - the Boston Globe
    MBTA reports rise in crimes - The Boston Globe mrochele's profile | Account settings | Log out Home Delivery Local Search Site Search HOME TODAY'S NEWS YOUR TOWN BUSINESS SPORTS LIFESTYLE A&E THINGS TO TRAVEL CARS JOBS REAL ESTATE Local National World Politics Business Education Health Science Green Obituaries Special reports Traffic Weather Lottery Follow Boston.com on Facebook HOME / NEWS / LOCAL / MASS. Like You like Boston.com. Unlike · Admin Page · Error MBTA reports rise in crimes You and 37 334 others like this 37334 likes Red Line had highest number of serious cases ADVERTISEMENT By Matt Rocheleau and L. Finch Globe Correspondents / February 5, 2011 E-mail | Print | Reprints | Comments (5) Text size – + Reports of serious crime at MBTA stations and stops rose 19 percent last year, fueled largely by an increase in thefts and violent crime across the system, according to new data from the transit agency. Like You like MBTA Overall, 987 serious crimes were reported in reports rise in 2010, up from 829 the previous year. Serious Tweet Be the first to Tweet this! crimes include arson, assault, homicide, rape, and various forms of theft. Accounting for the Yahoo! Buzz ShareThis change, violent and property crimes rose 29 percent and 14 percent, respectively, in 2010. Still, total incidents amounted to the fourth- lowest crime tally in the past three decades. “When you put that in perspective to the number of passengers we have per day, which is 1.3 million, the number of incidences occurring . is very low,’’ Transit Police Chief Paul MacMillan said in an interview.
    [Show full text]
  • Save 11% with Semester Passes UNLIMITED RIDES from February 1 – May 31 No Cancellations - No Refunds
    Boston University – Charles River Campus Get on board! Save 11% with Semester Passes UNLIMITED RIDES from February 1 – May 31 No cancellations - No refunds Schedule and Fare Information: (617)222-3200 www.mbta.com Spring 2019 Semester Pass Order Form Fill out this form and return it to: 11% Discount Parking & Transportation Services Prepaid/4 Months 1019 Commonwealth Avenue LOCAL BUS $195.80 Boston, MA 02215 Choose a LINK $300.82 pass type. Inner Express $455.68 Please make separate check payable to: See page 2 for an explanation OuterBus Express $598.08 Boston University of pass services. ZONEBus 1A $300.82 DEADLINE: January 10, 2019 ZONE 1 $712.89 Spring ZONE 2 $775.19 Student Name Semester: ZONE 3 $869.53 4 Passes (Feb. - ZONE 4 $936.28 Student ID # May) ZONE 5 $1,037.74 Telephone # ZONE 6 $1,132.08 ZONE 7 $1,197.94 ZONE 8 $1,292.28 ZONE 9 $1,351.02 ZONE 10 $1,417.77 BOAT PASS $1,096.48 Semester Pass Program Effective July 1, 2016 Local Bus $48.95/Month Zone 4 $234.07/Month • Any local MBTA Bus or Trackless Trolley, excluding Mattapan High- • All “Zone 1-3” services plus: Speed Line • Commuter Rail Zone 4: • All local portions of Express Buses 170, 351, 354, 424, 426, 428, 434, • Abington • Ballardvale • Beverly Depot • Brockton • Cohasset • Lincoln 448, 449, 450, 459, 553, 554, 556, and 558 • Montserrat • Montello • Nantasket Junction • Natick • Plimptonville • Silver Line from Dudley to Downtown Crossing/South Station (SL5) • Sharon • Stoughton • Walpole • West Natick • Windsor Gardens LinkPass (Rapid Transit) $75.21/Month Zone 5
    [Show full text]
  • Community Transportation Survey and Program
    COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION SURVEY AND PROGRAM TRANSACTION ASSOCIATES RECOMMENDATIONS 5 WHEELING AVE Weston, Massachusetts WOBURN, MA 01801 June 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Existing Transportation Services .................................................................................... 2 Council on Aging (COA) ..................................................................................................... 2 The Massachusetts Bay Transit Authority (MBTA) Commuter Rail ................................... 2 Taxi and Rideshare Services .............................................................................................. 3 3.0 Community Transportation Survey ................................................................................ 4 Driver Behavior ................................................................................................................. 4 Interest in Pilot Programs .................................................................................................. 7 4.0 Analysis and Options ..................................................................................................... 9 5.0 Implementation ........................................................................................................... 12 Equipment ....................................................................................................................... 12 Local Express
    [Show full text]
  • The American Legion 12Th National Convention: Official Program [1930]
    mmm TWELFTH ANNUAL (DNVENTION BOSTON 1930 twelfth Annual D^ational Convention THE AMERICAN LEGION Tenth Annual National Convention AMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY deventh Annual Promenade Nationale LA SOCIETE DES QUARANTE HOMMES ET HUIT CHEVAUX Eighth Annual Marche Nationale LA BOUTIQUE DES HUIT CHAPEAUX ET QUARANTE FEMMES BOSTON AND NEW ENGLAND PREAMBLE <<y^oR god and country, we associate ourselves together X/ for the following purposes: To uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America; to main- tain law and order; to footer and perpetuate a one hun- dred per cent Americanism; to preserve the memories and incidents of our association in the great war; to inculcate a sense of individual obligation to the community, Slate and nation; to combat the autocracy of both the classes and the masses; to make right the maSler of might; to promote peace and good will on earth; to safeguard and transmit to poSlerity the principles of juSlice, freedom and democracy; to consecrate and sandlify our comradeship by our de- votion to mutual helpfulness.” Page Two HERBERT HOOVER President of the United States and Marine Corps Commander-in-Chief of Army, Navy , GUEST OF HONOR TWELFTH ANNUAL CONVENTION THE AMERICAN LEGION Page Three FRANK G. ALLEN Governor Commonwealth of Massachusetts to ^ t lS more t^an a r i yil e e i* is an honor which comes Greetings ^ P g > <3 * me as Governor of Massachusetts, to extend to The American Legion the cordial greetings of our Commonwealth and to proffer the assurance of a hearty welcome. This year as we celebrate the Three Hundredth Anniversary of the begin- ning of our American democracy, it seems particularly appropriate that Boston should have been chosen as the meeting place of those who so valiantly defended those principles upon which our Government was founded.
    [Show full text]
  • Buzzards Bay Commuter Rail Extension Local Impact Report
    Buzzards Bay Commuter Rail Extension Local Impact Report April 2015 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. 1 Relevant Studies and Projects ............................................................................................ 3 Estimated Ridership and Parking Demand ........................................................................ 4 Ridership and Parking Correlation ................................................................................. 6 Existing Parking ...............................................................................................................7 Rail Platforms .................................................................................................................. 8 120 Space Alternative ...................................................................................................... 9 400-600 Space Alternative ............................................................................................10 Parking Structures .......................................................................................................... 12 Parking Policies and Access Options .............................................................................. 13 Traffic Impact .................................................................................................................... 14 Evaluated Locations ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]