DOCSLIB.ORG

Columbia Law School Winter 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

From the Dean On August 17, 2009, Dean David M. Schizer offered his welcoming remarks to the incoming class of J.D. and LL.M. students at Columbia Law School. An edited version of that address appears below. This is both an inspiring and a challenging time to come that excellence is measured in many different ways—in to law school. It is inspiring because the world needs you the pride you take in your work, in the reputation you more than ever. We live in troubled times, and many of develop among your peers, and, more importantly, in the great issues of our day are inextricably tied to law. Our the eyes of the people you have helped. But to my mind, financial system has foundered, and we need to respond excellence should not be measured in dollars. with more effective corporate governance and wiser The second fundamental truth to remember is that regulation. Innovation, competition, and free trade need integrity is the bedrock of any successful career. It is a to be encouraged in order for our economy to flourish. great source of satisfaction to know that you have earned Because of the significant demands on our public sector, your successes, that you didn’t cut any corners, and that our tax system needs to collect revenue efficiently and people trust you. fairly. Our dependence on imported fuel jeopardizes our As for the specifics of what career choices to make, national security, and our emission of greenhouse gases you are just beginning that journey. Most likely, there places our environment at risk. Terrorists threaten our will be twists and turns along the way, many of them national security, and our responses need to be effective unplanned. Indeed, if the world pushes you to take and faithful to our core values. Social issues such as risks and move out in new directions—in part because same-sex marriage, affirmative action, and abortion the more familiar paths are harder to navigate than they continue to divide our society. used to be—you may find yourself even more fulfilled, Each of these challenges demands the creativity and and more successful, because you charted a course that rigor of first-rate lawyers. [And] an extraordinarily was best suited to you. The bottom line, then, is that broad range of opportunities is open to you. We are all you have many exciting choices ahead of you. different, and you should take this opportunity to think I want to conclude by quoting Eleanor Roosevelt, expansively about what would be most fulfilling for you. the wife of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Class of 1907. I can promise you that, whatever your dream turns out As Mrs. Roosevelt famously said: “Yesterday is history, to be—whether it involves public interest litigation, tomorrow is a mystery, and today is a gift.” So I would academia, entrepreneurship, politics, private practice, encourage you to enjoy your time with us at Columbia or something else—we will prepare you for leadership in Law School, and to appreciate the remarkable gift that any sector, anywhere in the world. we all have been given by being together at this exciting Your goals should be success and happiness, of course, time and in this wonderful place. but the challenge in the coming years is to define what Welcome to the Columbia family! this means for you. As you try to figure this out, keep two fundamental truths in mind. First, excellence is its own reward. You have been blessed with extraordinary ability. You should appreciate what a glorious gift that is, and you should savor it. At the same time, remember LAW.COLUMBIA.EDU/MAGAZINE 1 Tableof Contents: 28 14 departments 4 14 18 19 20 EX POST FACTO SEE ALSO SETTING THE BAR FACULTY FOCUS PROFILES IN Kahlil Williams, Emma Education Policy, Civil Rights, SCHOLARSHIP 5 Neff, Erik Lindemann, James S. Liebman Olati Johnson Jane M. Spinak NEWS & EVENTS Jennifer Sokoler 48 ALUMNI PROFILES 52 Paramount leadershiP 48 evolving justice BY Peter Kiefer BY Carl Freire Viacom President Takesaki Hironobu ’71 and CEO Philippe LL.M., Japan’s chief Dauman ’78 remains justice, welcomes at the top of his game changes in the country’s during especially judicial system and sees challenging times for a unique opportunity the media industry. 56 from Professor to judge for learning. 54 By Debra A. LIvingston AT ISSUE ESSAYS A look at how issues of critical importance to leveling the 54 mediating medical judges are perceived Playing field conflicts by law professors, and BY Lila Byock BY Carol B. Liebman vice versa. As the driving force behind When addressing a highly successful health care disputes, 58 minority scholarship and the use of voluntary CLASS NOTES mentoring program, Della mediation makes a Britton Baeza ’78 builds on good deal of sense. 76 a hall of fame legacy. IN MEMORIAM 80 QUESTIONS PRESENTED Ruth Bader 50 Ginsburg ’59 2 COLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL MAGAZINE WINTER 2010 32 features 28 36 FAST FORWARD pulling their BY Ian Daly weight Law School graduates BY Ken Stier working at the intersection With an array of IN SESSION of new media technology international pro bono BY Carrie Johnson and the law are helping opportunities in Africa, Columbia Law School has a to reshape the world of Asia, Europe, and beyond, storied tradition of faculty and communications. Alumni the International Senior alumni ascending to important at Google, Microsoft, Lawyers Project enables positions in the judiciary. and Sirius XM Radio alumni with considerable For Law School students, discuss what attracted professional experience this means an unparalleled them to the field and to make a unique impact opportunity to learn from legal how technological in developing nations scholars of the highest order. advancements have around the globe. influenced their careers. 40 32 Marriage THE ROAD for same-sex LESS TRAVELED couples: BY Paula Span A conversation Around the world, and Marriage for same-sex just around the corner, couples is one of the most 22 graduates of the Law talked about legal issues in School are making an America today. Professors immense impact in the Emens, Franke, Goldberg, world of academia. For and Persily cover the issue this group of scholars, from a multitude of angles working to mold the next in a free-flowing discussion generation of intellectual that examines the future leaders and advance of marriage equality. meaningful ideas could not be more rewarding. LAW.COLUMBIA.EDU/MAGAZINE 3 Columbia Law School Magazine Dean david m. schizer Associate Dean for Development and Alumni Relations bruno m. santonocito Executive Director of Communications and Public Affairs elizabeth schmalz Editor matthew j.x. malady Managing Editor joy y. wang Assistant Editor mary johnson Photography Director peter freed Editorial Director james vescovi Copy Editor lauren pavlakovich Design and Art Direction the barnett group Printing maar printing service, inc. Columbia Law School Magazine is published three times annually for alumni and Summer Issue 2009 friends of Columbia Law School by the Office of Development and Alumni Relations. Opinions expressed in Columbia Law School Magazine do not necessarily reflect the views of Columbia Law School or Columbia University. Ex Post Facto This magazine is printed on FSC certified paper. appeared on page 22 too much on the plates High Hopes of the lawmakers on It seems that the real Capitol Hill to invest any challenge of the climate meaningful time into Change of address information should be sent to: change issue is its this kind of legislation. columbia law school inability to be confined With the current health 435 West 116 Street, Box A-2 to any given border. Even care debate, as well as New York, NY 10027 just addressing the issue the economic crisis, Attn: Office of Alumni Relations in the United States, while climate change policy alumni office certainly a necessary seems like it would just 212-854-2680 and important start, isn’t expend more political enough. Gerrard and capital from the Obama magazine notices Kolbert’s point about administration at this 212-854-2650 [email protected] the need for technology point than can be spared. and cash transfers speaks But this legislation has Copyright 2009, Columbia Law School. All rights reserved. to the underlying more implications for our international cooperation future than anything else that must take place. we currently face. –Anne Gilbert –Narayan Subramanian find us online! Visit law.columbia.edu/magazine Cap and trade sounds appeared on page 32 THROUGHOUT THE MAGAZINE, ICONS ALLOW like a great system on Global Positioning YOU TO SAY, DO, SEE, AND LEARN MORE. paper, but the actual More government is not implementation seems the answer; government is quite difficult, if not the problem. Government impossible. As the forced Fannie and Join the interview elucidates, a Freddie to buy subprime Conversation Go Beyond cap-and-trade system mortgages; government Tell us what Explore you think in our interactives seems ripe for gaming. failed to heed warnings comments section related to And the companies of the problems brewing the articles most affected by the there as a result; system would probably government allowed do everything in their investment banks to power to convince significantly increase the View More lawmakers in D.C. that leverage on their balance Watch videos and browse slideshows the entire idea behind sheets; and government cap and trade is a failure looked the other way Web because it would require while the credit default Exclusives more bureaucratic Read additional swaps market grew to web-only profiles control and would $53 trillion. What’s the and articles cripple our economy point of regulators if Listen In at a time of crisis.
Recommended publications
  • Theodore Olson, Conservative Stalwart, to Represent 'Dreamers' In

    Theodore Olson, Conservative Stalwart, to Represent 'Dreamers' In

    Theodore Olson, Conservative Stalwart, to Represent ‘Dreamers’ in Supreme Court By Adam Liptak • Sept. 26, 2019 o WASHINGTON — The young immigrants known as “Dreamers” have gained an unlikely ally in the Supreme Court. Theodore B. Olson, who argued for robust executive power in senior Justice Department posts under Republican presidents, will face off against lawyers from President Trump’s Justice Department in a case over Mr. Trump’s efforts to shut down a program that shields some 700,000 young undocumented immigrants from deportation and allows them to work. In an interview in his office, Mr. Olson said he had generally taken a broad view of presidential authority, particularly in the realm of immigration. “Executive power is important, and we respect it,” he said. “But it has to be done the right way. It has to be done in an orderly fashion so that citizens can understand what is being done and people whose lives have depended on a governmental policy aren’t swept away arbitrarily and capriciously. And that’s what’s happened here.” Mr. Olson has argued 63 cases in the Supreme Court, many of them as solicitor general under President George W. Bush. In private practice, he argued for the winning sides in Bush v. Gore, which handed the presidency to Mr. Bush, and Citizens United, which amplified the role of money in politics. But Mr. Olson disappointed some of his usual allies when he joined David Boies, his adversary in Bush v. Gore, to challenge California’s ban on same-sex marriage. That case reached the Supreme Court and helped pave the way for the court’s 2015 decision establishing a constitutional right to such unions.
  • Theranos As a Legal Ethics Case Study

    Theranos As a Legal Ethics Case Study

    Vanderbilt University Law School Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 2021 How and Why Did It Go So Wrong?: Theranos as a Legal Ethics Case Study G. S. Hans Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/faculty-publications Part of the Legal Education Commons, and the Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons DATE DOWNLOADED: Mon May 24 12:25:08 2021 SOURCE: Content Downloaded from HeinOnline Citations: Bluebook 21st ed. G. S. Hans, How and Why Did It Go So Wrong?: Theranos as a Legal Ethics Case Study, 37 GA. St. U. L. REV. 427 (2021). ALWD 6th ed. Hans, G. G., How and why did it go so wrong?: Theranos as a legal ethics case study, 37(2) Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 427 (2021). APA 7th ed. Hans, G. G. (2021). How and why did it go so wrong?: Theranos as legal ethics case study. Georgia State University Law Review, 37(2), 427-470. Chicago 17th ed. G. S. Hans, "How and Why Did It Go So Wrong?: Theranos as a Legal Ethics Case Study," Georgia State University Law Review 37, no. 2 (Winter 2021): 427-470 McGill Guide 9th ed. G S Hans, "How and Why Did It Go So Wrong?: Theranos as a Legal Ethics Case Study" (2021) 37:2 Ga St U L Rev 427. AGLC 4th ed. G S Hans, 'How and Why Did It Go So Wrong?: Theranos as a Legal Ethics Case Study' (2021) 37(2) Georgia State University Law Review 427. MLA 8th ed.
  • Ruling for Starr International Companies Win for Barclays Digital

    Ruling for Starr International Companies Win for Barclays Digital

    July 2015 REPORT Ruling for Starr International Companies Digital Music Trial Boies, Schiller & Flexner Chairman David Bernanke and former Treasury Secretary Major publications reported on one of the Boies and a team of lawyers from the Firm Timothy Geithner, the Boies, Schiller most impressive antitrust trial wins of the won what many had considered an against- & Flexner team also shed light on the year in December 2014, when Apple Inc. the-odds victory in a case against the U.S. inner workings of the government in the fought off accusations that it had used an government for illegally taking over insurer financial crisis. Bloomberg News said “the iTunes software update to create a monopoly AIG at the height of the financial crisis of ruling solidifies Mr. Boies’s reputation for in the digital music market. As noted by those 2008. Judge Thomas Wheeler ruled on June winning long-shot cases,” while the Wall publications, the jury verdict for the defense 15, 2015, that the government violated the Street Journal described Mr. Boies as “one ended a decade-long dispute in which the law when it took a controlling stake in AIG. of the best trial lawyers in the country.” plaintiffs sought more than $1 billion in treble “The government’s unduly harsh treatment The court denied plaintiffs’ claims for damages under the Sherman Act. Apple’s of AIG in comparison to other institutions damages, based on a legal ruling that is lawyers repeatedly pointed out the plaintiffs’ seemingly was misguided and had no now on appeal. The trial team included Bob side lacked any actual iPod customers saying legitimate purpose,” Judge Wheeler wrote in Silver, Alanna Rutherford, Amy Mauser, Bob they were harmed, the NewYork Times reported.
  • Copyright and State Sovereign Immunity

    Copyright and State Sovereign Immunity

    united states copyright office Copyright and State Sovereign Immunity A REPORT Of ThE REgister Of cOPyRighTs AugusT 2021 united states copyright office Copyright and State Sovereign Immunity A report Of ThE REgister Of cOPyRighTs AugusT 2021 The Honorable Patrick Leahy Chair Subcommittee on Intellectual Property United States Senate 437 Russell Senate Building Washington, D.C. 20510 The Honorable Thom Tillis Ranking Member Subcommittee on Intellectual Property United States Senate 113 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 August 31, 2021 Dear Chairman Leahy and Ranking Member Tillis: On behalf of the United States Copyright Office, I am pleased to deliver a copy of a report entitled Copyright and State Sovereign Immunity, which is available to the public on the Office’s website. Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Allen v. Cooper, you requested that the Copyright Office undertake a study to determine whether, consistent with the Court’s analysis, Congress could legislatively abrogate state sovereign immunity to suits in federal court for damages for copyright infringement. In response to your request, the Office solicited the views of interested stakeholders and held roundtables to amplify the record. The Office received comments from many copyright owners who believed that their works had been infringed by state entities. A number of state entities provided information about their policies on copyright, and views regarding allegations of infringement and the possible effect of abrogation on their operations. The Office also conducted extensive research into the legal standards governing abrogation in the context of copyright infringement. After carefully evaluating the information provided, the Office can report that the number of allegations of state infringement provided in the course of this study is substantially greater than the number Congress considered when it adopted its prior abrogation legislation, and greater than the evidence found insufficient in prior intellectual property cases.
  • Doe V. Backpage

    Doe V. Backpage

    No. 16-276 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States __________ JANE DOE NO. 1, ET AL., Petitioners, v. BACKPAGE.COM, LLC, ET AL., Respondents. __________ On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit __________ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICI CURIAE BRIEF AND AMICI CURIAE BRIEF OF LEGAL MOMENTUM, CINDY MCCAIN, FLORIDA ABOLITIONIST, NATIONAL CENTER ON SEXUAL EXPLOITATION, THE ORGANIZATION FOR PROSTITUTION SURVIVORS, RISING INTERNATIONAL, SOJOURNER CENTER, STOLENYOUTH, STREETLIGHT USA, AND YWCA OF SILICON VALLEY IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI __________ KAREN A. CHESLEY DAVID BOIES BENJAMIN MARGULIS Counsel of Record JOANNA WRIGHT BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP ALEXANDER BOIES IEVGENIIA VATRENKO BOIES, SCHILLER ALEX T. POTTER & FLEXNER LLP 333 Main Street 575 Lexington Avenue Armonk, NY 10504 New York, NY 10022 Phone: (914) 749-8200 [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae MOTION OF AMICI CURIAE FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR CERTIORARI Amici curiae Legal Momentum, Cindy McCain, Florida Abolitionist, the National Center on Sexual Exploitation, the Organization for Prostitution Survivors, Rising International, Sojourner Center, StolenYouth, Streetlight USA, and the YWCA of Silicon Valley respectfully move for leave of Court to file the accompanying brief under Supreme Court Rule 37.3(b). Counsel for Petitioner has consented to the filing of this brief; counsel for Respondent has withheld consent. As set forth more fully below, amici provide legal, advocacy, social services and other support to trafficking survivors and educate the public on the widespread harm caused by sex trafficking.
  • THE FUTURE of IDEAS This Work Is Licensed Under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License (US/V3.0)

    THE FUTURE of IDEAS This Work Is Licensed Under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License (US/V3.0)

    less_0375505784_4p_fm_r1.qxd 9/21/01 13:49 Page i THE FUTURE OF IDEAS This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License (US/v3.0). Noncommercial uses are thus permitted without any further permission from the copyright owner. Permissions beyond the scope of this license are administered by Random House. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.randomhouse.com/about/ permissions.html The book maybe downloaded in electronic form (freely) at: http://the-future-of-ideas.com For more permission about Creative Commons licenses, go to: http://creativecommons.org less_0375505784_4p_fm_r1.qxd 9/21/01 13:49 Page iii the future of ideas THE FATE OF THE COMMONS IN A CONNECTED WORLD /// Lawrence Lessig f RANDOM HOUSE New York less_0375505784_4p_fm_r1.qxd 9/21/01 13:49 Page iv Copyright © 2001 Lawrence Lessig All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. Published in the United States by Random House, Inc., New York, and simultaneously in Canada by Random House of Canada Limited, Toronto. Random House and colophon are registered trademarks of Random House, Inc. library of congress cataloging-in-publication data Lessig, Lawrence. The future of ideas : the fate of the commons in a connected world / Lawrence Lessig. p. cm. Includes index. ISBN 0-375-50578-4 1. Intellectual property. 2. Copyright and electronic data processing. 3. Internet—Law and legislation. 4. Information society. I. Title. K1401 .L47 2001 346.04'8'0285—dc21 2001031968 Random House website address: www.atrandom.com Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 24689753 First Edition Book design by Jo Anne Metsch less_0375505784_4p_fm_r1.qxd 9/21/01 13:49 Page v To Bettina, my teacher of the most important lesson.
  • Award Ceremony November 6, 2013 WELCOME NOTE from RICHARD M

    Award Ceremony November 6, 2013 WELCOME NOTE from RICHARD M

    AWARD CEREMONY NOVEMBER 6, 2013 WELCOME NOTE from RICHARD M. ABORN Dear Friends, Welcome to the third annual fundraiser for the Citizens Crime Commission of New York City. This year we celebrate 35 years of effective advocacy – work which has made our city BOARD of DIRECTORS safer and influenced the direction of national, state, and local criminal justice policy. At the Crime Commission, we are prouder than ever of the role we play in the public process. We are also grateful for the generous support of people like you, who make our work possible. CHAIRMAN VICE CHAIRMAN Richard J. Ciecka Gary A. Beller Keeping citizens safe and government responsive requires vigilant research and analysis Mutual of America (Retired) MetLife (Retired) in order to develop smart ideas for improving law enforcement and our criminal justice system. To enable positive change, we are continually looking for new trends in crime and Thomas A. Dunne Lauren Resnick public safety management while staying at the forefront of core issue areas such as guns, Fordham University Baker Hostetler gangs, cyber crime, juvenile justice, policing, and terrorism. Abby Fiorella Lewis Rice This year has been as busy as ever. We’ve stoked important policy discussions, added to MasterCard Worldwide Estée Lauder Companies critical debates, and offered useful ideas for reform. From hosting influential voices in public safety – such as Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman Richard Girgenti J. Brendan Ryan and United States Attorney Preet Bharara – at our Speaker Series forums, to developing KPMG LLP DraftFCB cyber crime education initiatives and insightful research on the city’s gangs, the Crime Commission continued its tradition as the pre-eminent advocate for a safer New York.
  • Lessons from New York's Recent Experience with Capital Punishment

    Lessons from New York's Recent Experience with Capital Punishment

    BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU ASK FOR: LESSONS FROM NEW YORK’S RECENT EXPERIENCE WITH CAPITAL PUNISHMENT James R. Acker* INTRODUCTION On March 7, 1995, Governor George Pataki signed legislation authorizing the death penalty in New York for first-degree murder,1 representing the State’s first capital punishment law enacted in the post- Furman era.2 By taking this action the governor made good on a pledge that was central to his campaign to unseat Mario Cuomo, a three-term incumbent who, like his predecessor, Hugh Carey, had repeatedly vetoed legislative efforts to resuscitate New York’s death penalty after it had been declared unconstitutional.3 The promised law was greeted with enthusiasm. The audience at the new governor’s inauguration reserved its most spirited 4 ovation for Pataki’s reaffirmation of his support for capital punishment. * Distinguished Teaching Professor, School of Criminal Justice, University at Albany; Ph.D. 1987, University at Albany; J.D. 1976, Duke Law School; B.A. 1972, Indiana University. In the spirit of full disclosure, the author appeared as a witness at one of the public hearings (Jan. 25, 2005) sponsored by the Assembly Committees discussed in this Article. 1. Twelve categories of first-degree murder were made punishable by death under the 1995 legislation, and a thirteenth type (killing in furtherance of an act of terrorism) was added following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. N.Y. PENAL LAW § 125.27 (McKinney 2003). Also detailed were the procedures governing the prosecution’s filing of a notice of intent to seek the death penalty, N.Y.
  • The Next Great Copyright Act

    The Next Great Copyright Act

    THE NEXT GREAT COPYRIGHT ACT Twenty-Sixth Horace S. Manges Lecture by Maria A. Pallante1 I. INTRODUCTION Tonight my topic is the next great copyright act, but before I speak about the future, I would like to talk a little about the past, including the role of the Copyright Office in past revision activities. In my remarks, I will address the need for comprehensive review and revision of U.S. copyright law, identify the most significant issues, and suggest a framework by which Congress should weigh the public interest, which includes the interests of authors. I also will address the necessary evolution of the Copyright Office itself. Those of you who have been to our offices in Washington know that we have a conference room featuring portraits of the former Registers of Copyright dating back to 1897.2 When guests are seated at our table, the former Registers preside on high, wearing a variety of expressions and overseeing complex conversations about copyright law in the digital age. Sometimes I think they would be startled by the discussions we have, but then again it might all sound familiar. Solberg (1887-1933) Thorvald Solberg was the first and longest-serving Register of Copyrights. He seems inspired in his portrait, and for good reason. Solberg was a visionary leader, a champion of authors’ rights, and an early advocate for the United States’ adherence to the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (“Berne Convention”).3 Under his care, the Copyright Office grew from a handful of employees to more than a hundred professional staff, and took on the many assorted roles that are still critical to the mission of the Office today.
  • The Philip Glass Ensemble in Downtown New York, 1966-1976 David Allen Chapman Washington University in St

    The Philip Glass Ensemble in Downtown New York, 1966-1976 David Allen Chapman Washington University in St

    Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) Spring 4-27-2013 Collaboration, Presence, and Community: The Philip Glass Ensemble in Downtown New York, 1966-1976 David Allen Chapman Washington University in St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd Part of the Music Commons Recommended Citation Chapman, David Allen, "Collaboration, Presence, and Community: The hiP lip Glass Ensemble in Downtown New York, 1966-1976" (2013). All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs). 1098. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd/1098 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUIS Department of Music Dissertation Examination Committee: Peter Schmelz, Chair Patrick Burke Pannill Camp Mary-Jean Cowell Craig Monson Paul Steinbeck Collaboration, Presence, and Community: The Philip Glass Ensemble in Downtown New York, 1966–1976 by David Allen Chapman, Jr. A dissertation presented to the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2013 St. Louis, Missouri © Copyright 2013 by David Allen Chapman, Jr. All rights reserved. CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................
  • Money for Something: Music Licensing in the 21St Century

    Money for Something: Music Licensing in the 21St Century

    Money for Something: Music Licensing in the 21st Century Updated February 23, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R43984 SUMMARY R43984 Money for Something: Music Licensing in the February 23, 2021 21st Century Dana A. Scherer Songwriters and recording artists are generally entitled to receive compensation for Specialist in (1) reproductions, distributions, and public performances of the notes and lyrics they create (the Telecommunications musical works), as well as (2) reproductions, distributions, and certain digital public Policy performances of the recorded sound of their voices combined with instruments (the sound recordings). The amount they receive, as well as their control over their music, depends on market forces, contracts between a variety of private-sector entities, and laws governing copyright and competition policy. Who pays whom, as well as who can sue whom for copyright infringement, depends in part on the mode of listening to music. Congress enacted several major updates to copyright laws in 2018 in the Orrin G. Hatch-Bob Goodlatte Music Modernization Act (MMA; P.L. 115-264). The MMA modified copyright laws related to the process of granting and receiving statutory licenses for the reproduction and distribution of musical works (known as “mechanical licenses”). The law set forth terms for the creation of a nonprofit “mechanical licensing collective” through which owners of copyrights in musical works could collect royalties from online music services. The law also changed the standards used by a group of federal administrative law judges, the Copyright Royalty Board, to set royalty rates for some statutory copyright licenses, as well as the standards used by a federal court to set rates for licenses to publicly perform musical works offered by two organizations representing publishers and composers, ASCAP and BMI.
  • Chicago Unbound Philippic.Com

    Chicago Unbound Philippic.Com

    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 2002 Philippic.com Cass R. Sunstein Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Cass R. Sunstein, "Philippic.com ," 90 California Law Review 611 (2002). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Review Essay Philippic.corn REPUBLIC.COM By Cass Sunstein Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2001. Pp. 224. $19.95 cloth. Reviewed by Dan Hunterf A recent trend in so-called "second generation" legal commentary about the Internet suggests that, though it is an unparalleledcommunica- tion medium and a means of engaging in global e-commerce, it is not an unmitigatedforce for good. Instead,the Net poses afundamental danger to democracy. This trend takes shape in works by well-known cyberlaw theo- rists like Lawrence Lessig, Andrew Shapiro, and Neil Weinstock Netanel, but the most recent and most troubling criticism lies in Professor Cass Sunstein 's Republic.com. In this book, Professor Sunstein argues that perfectfiltering of infor- mation on the Internet will lead to a fractured communications environ- ment. He suggests that this fracturing will lead to group polarization, cascades of false information, and a concomitant rise in extremism. Governmental regulation of the Internet to reduce these features is there- fore warranted,and desirable.He suggests that the appropriateregulatory responses should include setting up or supportingpublic environmentsfor deliberation and debate on the Net, along with a series of disclosure and "must-carry" rules.