DOCSLIB.ORG

Remembering Socrates Philosophical Essays

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Remembering Socrates Philosophical Essays Remembering Socrates Philosophical Essays Edited by LINDSAY JUDSON and VASSILIS KARASMANIS CLARENDON PRESS Á OXFORD 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox2 6dp Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With oYces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York ß the several contributors 2006 The moral rights of the authors have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2006 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose the same condition on any acquirer British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Data available Typeset by SPI Publisher Services, Pondicherry, India Printed in Great Britain on acid-free paper by Biddles Ltd., King’s Lynn, Norfolk ISBN 0-19-927613-7 978-0-19-927613-4 13579108642 Contents Notes on Contributors and Editors vii Introduction 1 1. Socrates’ Dialectic in Xenophon’s Memorabilia 3 Carlo Natali 2. If you Know What is Best, you Do it: Socratic Intellectualism in Xenophon and Plato 20 Gerhard Seel 3. Socrates and Hedonism 50 Charles H. Kahn 4. Socrates and Euthyphro: The Argument and its Revival 58 Terence Irwin 5. Did Socrates Agree to Obey the Laws of Athens? 72 Lesley Brown 6. Aporia and Searching in the Early Plato 88 Vasilis Politis 7. Types of DeWnition in the Meno 110 David Charles 8. DeWnition in Plato’s Meno 129 Vassilis Karasmanis 9. Sharing a Property 142 Theodore Scaltsas 10. Socrates the Sophist 157 C. C. W. Taylor 11. Arcesilaus: Socratic and Sceptic 169 John M. Cooper 12. The Early Christian Reception of Socrates 188 Michael Frede Index 203 Notes on the Contributors and Editors Lesley Brown is Centenary Fellow in Philosophy at Somerville College, Oxford, and the author of numerous articles and book chapters on Plato and Aristotle. David Charles is Fellow and Tutor in Philosophy at Oriel College, Oxford. He is the author of Aristotle’s Philosophy of Action (London, 1984), Aristotle on Meaning and Essence (Oxford, 2000), and a variety of articles on topics in ancient and contemporary philosophy. John M. Cooper is Stuart Professor of Philosophy and Director of the Program in Classical Philosophy at Princeton University. His books include Reason and Human Good in Aristotle (Cambridge, Mass., and London, 1975), Seneca: Moral and Political Essays (co-edited with J. F. Procope´, Cambridge, 1995), Plato: Complete Works (edited with D.S. Hutchinson, Indianapolis and Cambridge, 1997), Reason and Emotion: Essays on Ancient Moral Psychology and Ethical Theory (Princeton, 1999), and Knowledge, Nature, and the Good: Essays on Ancient Philosophy (Princeton, 2004). Michael Frede is Emeritus Professor of the History of Philosophy, Oxford University. His publications include Galen: Three Treatises on the Nature of Science (with Richard Walzer, Indianapolis, 1985), Essays in Ancient Philosophy (Oxford, 1987), Aristoteles Metaphysik Z (with Gu¨nther Patzig, Munich, 1988), and The Original Sceptics: A Controversy (with Myles Burnyeat, In- dianapolis and Cambridge, 1997). Terence Irwin is Susan Linn Sage Professor of Philosophy and Humane Letters, Cornell University. His books include Aristotle’s First Principles (Oxford, 1988), Classical Thought (Oxford, 1989), Plato’s Ethics (Oxford, 1995), and Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics (2nd edn, Indianapolis and Cambridge, 1999). Lindsay Judson is Official Student and Tutor in Philosophy, Christ Church, Oxford. He is the author of a variety of articles on ancient philosophy, and is the Editor of the Clarendon Aristotle Series and Co-editor (with Julia Annas) of Oxford Aristotle Studies. Charles H. Kahn is Professor of Philosophy, University of Pennsylvania. He is the author of Anaximander and the Origins of Greek Cosmology (New York, 1960), The Art and Thought of Heraclitus (Cambridge, 1979), Plato and the Socratic Dialogue (Cambridge, 1996), and Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans (Indianapolis and Cambridge, 2001), The Verb ‘Be’ in Ancient Greek (2nd edn, Indianapolis and Cambridge, 2002). Vassilis Karasmanis is Professor of Philosophy, Technical University of Athens. He is the author of numerous articles on ancient philosophy and ancient mathematics. He was Director of the European Cultural Centre of Delphi from 1994 to 2004. viii Notes on the Contributors and Editors Carlo Natali is Professor of Philosophy, Universita’di Venezia. His books include The Wisdom of Aristotle (Albany, 2001), L’action efficace. Etudes de la the´orie de l’action d’Aristote (Louvain-la-Neuve, 2004), and Aristotle’s Life and the Or- ganisation of his School (Princeton, 2006). He is Co-editor (with Lloyd Gerson and Gerhard Seel) of International Aristotle Studies. Vasilis Politis is Lecturer in Philosophy, Trinity College, Dublin. His publica- tions include Aristotle and the Metaphysics (London, 2004) and a translation of Paul Natorp, Plato’s Theory of Ideas (with John Connolly, Berlin, 2004). Theodore Scaltsas is Professor of Ancient Philosophy, University of Edinburgh. His books include Substances and Universals in Aristotle’s Metaphysics (Ithaca, 1994) and Unity, Identity and Explanation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics (co-edited with David Charles and Mary Louise Gill, Oxford, 1994). His most recent publications are on the topics of plural subjects, relations, and ontological composition. He is the Director of Project Archelogos. Gerhard Seel is Professor of Philosophy and Director of the Institute for Philosophy, University of Bern. His publications include Sartres Dialektik (Bonn 1971), Die Aristotelische Modaltheorie (Berlin and New York, 1982), and Ammonius and the Sea Battle (with J-P. Schneider and D. Schulthess, Berlin, 2001). He is Secretary General of the International Academy for Philosophy of Art and Co-editor (with Lloyd Gerson and Carlo Natali) of International Aristotle Studies. C. C. W. Taylor is Emeritus Professor of Philosophy, Oxford University, and an Emeritus Fellow of Corpus Christi College. He is author of The Greeks on Pleasure (with J. C. B. Gosling, Oxford, 1982), Plato, Protagoras (2nd edn, Oxford, 1991), Socrates (Oxford, 1998), and The Atomists: Leucippus and Democritus (Toronto, 1999). He was Editor of Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy from 1993 to 1998. Introduction Socrates died in Athens in 399 bc by drinking hemlock, condemned to death by his fellow citizens. In 2001 the European Cultural Centre of Delphi, with the support of the Greek Ministry of Culture, organized a number of activities and events to commemorate the 2,400th anniversary of Socrates’ death. One of these was an international conference on Socrates, held in Athens and Delphi: in this volume, with the permission of the European Cultural Centre of Delphi, we publish some of the papers presented at this conference. For the selection of the papers the editors were assisted by David Charles and Michael Frede. The essays in this collection pursue in various ways Socrates’ most famous saying ‘The unexamined life is not a life worth living for a human being’ (Apology 38a). One theme is Socrates’ own methods of examination. Socrates enquires by question and answer, argument and counterargument, with a variety of inter- locutors, an approach which some writers called ‘dialectic’, and which had among its oVspring Platonic and Aristotelian dialectic. Carlo Natali discusses Socratic dialectic as portrayed by Xenophon. Vasilis Politis focuses on another key ingredient of Socrates’ examinations—aporia, puzzlement—in which some of Socrates’ conversations begin and many end. Socrates linked the idea of the examined life to the good life in at least two ways. First, his enquiries often focus on the need to arrive at deWnitions of notions central to living well, such as courage, piety, or friendship: David Charles and Vassilis Karasmanis explore the development of this idea of deWnition in Plato’s Meno. Second, Socrates em- braced the idea that coming to know the truth about living well—enquiries of the type he engaged in being one, if not the only, way to achieve this—was enough to guarantee that one did indeed live well. Gerhard Seel and Charles Kahn explore diVerent aspects of this diYcult and challenging doctrine. Three further papers are concerned with particular sets of arguments in Platonic dialogues. Terence Irwin and Lesley Brown consider famous and much-discussed arguments asso- ciated with Socrates’ trial and execution, in Plato’s Euthyphro and Crito respect- ively, while Theodore Scaltsas looks at a more neglected
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Coherence of Stoic Ontology
    The Coherence of Stoic Ontology by Vanessa de Harven A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Prof. Dorothea Frede, Co-chair Prof. Klaus Corcilius, Co-chair Prof. A.A. Long Spring 2012 Abstract The Coherence of Stoic Ontology by Vanessa de Harven Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy University of California, Berkeley Professors Dorothea Frede and Klaus Corcilius, Co-chairs Any thoroughgoing physicalist is challenged to give an account of immaterial entities such as thoughts and mathematical objects. The Stoics, who eagerly affirmed that only bodies exist, crafted an elegant solution to this challenge: not everything that is Something (ti) exists. Rather, some things have a derivative mode of reality they call subsistence: these entities are non-existent in that they are not themselves solid bodies, but they are nonetheless Something physical because they depend on bodies for their subsistence. My dissertation uncovers the unifying principles of Stoic subsistence, and shows how they can account for thoughts and other immaterial entities without running afoul of their physicalist commitments. While all commentators agree that the Stoics posited Something as the highest category of being, they have failed to find a coherent physicalist account of Stoic ontology. For instance, (1) a canonical set of incorporeals (time, place, void, and what is sayable (lekton)) is well attested, but there is little agreement as to what these entities have in common as incorporeals, which makes the category look like an ad hoc collection of left-over entities.
    [Show full text]
  • Commentary on Englert Martha Nussbaum I Admire Englert's
    Commentary on Englert Martha Nussbaum I admire Englert's paper. I find its major conclusions entirely convincing: (1) the analysis of the difference between Epicurean and Stoic attitudes to suicide; (2) the account of the original Stoic position; (3) the argument that Seneca is an orthodox Stoic about suicide; and (4) the very interesting claims about the role of dif- ferent sorts of freedom in Seneca's arguments. Although I am persuaded by his analysis, I am inclined to be somewhat more critical of the Stoic position than he seems inclined to be: for I think that in a crucial way it is internally incoherent. In what follows, therefore, I want to focus on a problem in the Stoic account itself, with respect to the ambivalence the suicide theory reveals toward the importance of externals. I shall do this by focusing on one line of argument leading to suicide, in Seneca's De Ira.l 1. The Stoics famously hold that only virtue is worth choosing for its own sake. And virtue all by itself suffices for a complete- ly fulfilled and fulfilling human life, that is, for eudaimonia. Virtue is something unaffected by external contingency—both, apparently, as to its acquisition and as to its maintenance once acquired? Items that are not fully under the control of the 1. My interpretation of this work is developed at greater length in Nussbaum 1994. My general account of Stoic virtue theory and its relationship to the call for the extirpation of passion is in chapter 10, my detailed analysis of the argu- ments about anger in the De Ira in chapter 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Platons Raumbegriff Verständlich, Desgleichen Der Umstand, Daß Timaios Grenzen Einer Erklärung Der Welt Und Schwierigkeiten Einer Konsistenten Darstellung Hervorhebt
    Der Begriff des Raumes im „Timaios“ im Zusammenhang mit der Naturphilosophie und der Metaphysik Platons Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophie der Philosophischen Fakultät der Universität Konstanz vorgelegt von Kyung Jik Lee aus Seoul Referent: Prof. Dr. Jürgen Mittelstraß Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Gereon Wolters Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 19. Juli 1999 Diese Arbeit erscheint im Mai 2000 auch als Buchhandelsausgabe im Verlag Königshausen & Neumann, Würzburg Meinen Eltern gewidmet Inhaltsverzeichnis Vorwort 9 I Die Erklärung der Welt als wahrscheinliche Erklärung (eikôs logos) 11 1 Einleitung 2 Die Synonymität von eikôs mythos und eikôs logos 3 Der eikôs logos als nicht-philosophische Erklärung 4 Der eikôs logos 4.1 Akribês logos? 4.2 Das Wahrscheinliche und das Historische 4.3 Das Wahrscheinliche und das Notwendige 4.4 Die wahrscheinliche Rede als inkonsistente Rede 4.5 Die wahrscheinliche Rede als hypothetische Anwendung einer exakten Erklärung auf sinnliche Gegenstände 4.6 Die wahrscheinliche Rede als Begrenzung der Anwendung einer exakten Erklärung auf sinnliche Gegenstände II Der Demiurg und der Logos der Welt 38 1 Einleitung 2 Wer ist der Demiurg im „Timaios“? 3 Demiurg und Gott 4 Demiurg und Weltseele 5 Demiurg und Idee des Guten 6 Demiurg und transzendente Vernunft 7 Schwierigkeiten der Rede vom Demiurgen 7.1 Zur Suche nach dem Demiurgen 7.2 Logos und Ergon 7.3 Demiurg und Timaios 7.3.1 Einleitung 7.3.2 Poiêtês 7.3.3 Weitere Parallelen zwischen Demiurg und Timaios 7.3.4 Gott und Götter 7.4 Der Demiurg
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Cynicism
    A HISTORY OF CYNICISM Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com A HISTORY OF CYNICISM From Diogenes to the 6th Century A.D. by DONALD R. DUDLEY F,llow of St. John's College, Cambrid1e Htmy Fellow at Yale University firl mll METHUEN & CO. LTD. LONDON 36 Essex Street, Strand, W.C.2 Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com First published in 1937 PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com PREFACE THE research of which this book is the outcome was mainly carried out at St. John's College, Cambridge, Yale University, and Edinburgh University. In the help so generously given to my work I have been no less fortunate than in the scenes in which it was pursued. I am much indebted for criticism and advice to Professor M. Rostovtseff and Professor E. R. Goodonough of Yale, to Professor A. E. Taylor of Edinburgh, to Professor F. M. Cornford of Cambridge, to Professor J. L. Stocks of Liverpool, and to Dr. W. H. Semple of Reading. I should also like to thank the electors of the Henry Fund for enabling me to visit the United States, and the College Council of St. John's for electing me to a Research Fellowship. Finally, to• the unfailing interest, advice and encouragement of Mr. M. P. Charlesworth of St. John's I owe an especial debt which I can hardly hope to repay. These acknowledgements do not exhaust the list of my obligations ; but I hope that other kindnesses have been acknowledged either in the text or privately.
    [Show full text]
  • Mythologies and Partisan Constructions of the Good Philosopher in Plato
    Article Hic Sunt Leones: Mythologies and Partisan Constructions of the Good Philosopher in Plato Sergio Alloggio https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7273-3954 University of Pretoria [email protected] Abstract Plato constructs the philosopher in contrast to the sophist. Both sophistical and rhetorical logos, in their epistemic closeness to philosophical logos, require a constant act of demarcation throughout Plato’s works. The challenge posed by the sophists creates a structural, instable tension in several Platonic dialogues. Why is the Athenian philosopher obsessed by a different yet comparable approach to virtue, knowledge and social order? Why does the Athenian philosopher need and, at the same time, reject the sophist when it comes to shaping his own self-image? To try to answer these questions, I will go back to a foundational moment where the Platonic philosopher is theoretically constructed and conceptually produced against the sophist, namely, Plato’s Sophist, Statesman, Protagoras, Gorgias and Phaedrus. The aim of the article is to show how the Platonic philosopher is conveniently defined through a series of partisan demarcations grounded on ontological privilege, epistemic exclusion, ethical circularity and, ultimately, political delegitimation. Keywords: Plato; dialectic; demarcation; partisanship; sophistics; agonistics; delegitimation Decolonization was the preoccupation of two [T]he unconscious has first and foremost to do with groups that propelled the nationalist movement: the grammar … This also has a bit to do, or much to intelligentsia and the political class. They set out to do, or everything to do, with repetition, that is, create the nation, the former to give the with the aspect that is entirely the opposite of what independent state a history and the latter to create a a dictionary is used for … Grammar and repetition common citizenship as the basis of national constitute a completely different aspect from what sovereignty.
    [Show full text]
  • Aidws in Epictetus Rachana Kamtekar Classical Philology, Vol. 93, No. 2
    Aidws in Epictetus Rachana Kamtekar Classical Philology, Vol. 93, No. 2. (Apr., 1998), pp. 136-160. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0009-837X%28199804%2993%3A2%3C136%3AAIE%3E2.0.CO%3B2-0 Classical Philology is currently published by The University of Chicago Press. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/ucpress.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is an independent not-for-profit organization dedicated to and preserving a digital archive of scholarly journals. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. http://www.jstor.org Thu May 17 17:41:17 2007 AIARX IN EPICTETUS RACHANA KAMTEKAR N CHARACTERIZING THE virtuous ideal, Epictetus departs from the tradi- tional list of Stoic virtues.' Often, instead of describing the virtuous I person as dv6psio~(courageous), ohcppov (temperate), cpp6v~poq(pru- dent), or ~~KULO<(just), Epictetus says that he is Ehe60epoq
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy,  (), – at – )
    Offprint from OXFORDSTUDIES INANCIENT PHILOSOPHY EDITOR:BRADINWOOD VOLUMEXLIX 3 MAKINGSENSEOF STOICINDIFFERENTS JACOBKLEIN . Introduction A to the older Stoics, virtue is the only good and the sole constituent of happiness, but certain ordinary objects of desire, such as health and wealth, possess a kind of value that makes them fitting objects of pursuit. These items are indifferent, the Stoics say, but nonetheless promoted. Though health and wealth make no con- tribution to the human good, the Stoics argue that we are to pursue them whenever circumstances allow. Indeed, a failure to maintain one’s health and wealth in ordinary circumstances is a failure of ra- tionality and an impediment to virtue, in their view. This doctrine has provoked criticism in ancient commentators and puzzlement in modern ones. An ancient line of criticism— prominent in Plutarch and Alexander of Aphrodisias—can be © Jacob Klein For help with this paper, I especially thank Terry Irwin and Tad Brennan. Terry patiently read, commented on, and discussed early drafts, helping me formulate and sharpen my claims. Though I have ventured to disagree with him, I am grateful for the skill and patience with which he pressed me to clarify my views. Tad Brennan provided input and guidance at a later stage. I owe much to his work on Stoicism and to our conversations over the years. I am especially grateful for feedback re- ceived from students in his graduate course on Stoic ethics, offered at Cornell Uni- versity in the Spring of . Brad Inwood provided extensive comments on later drafts, correcting mistakes and suggesting improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anthyphairetic Revolutions of the Platonic Ideas Stelios Negrepontis
    The Anthyphairetic Revolutions of the Platonic Ideas Stelios Negrepontis θεὰ σκέδασ' ἠέρα, εἴσατο δὲ χθών· Odusseia, Book XIII, line 352 Abstract. In the present work Plato’s philosophy is interpreted as an imitation, a close philosophic analogue of the geometric concept of a pair of lines incommensurable in length only and of its (palindromically) periodic anthyphairesis. It is shown, by an examination of the Platonic dialogues Theaetetus, Sophistes, Politicus, and Philebus, that (a) a Platonic Idea is the philosophic analogue of a dyad of lines incommensurable in length only, (b) the Division and Collection, the method by which humans obtain knowledge of a Platonic Idea, is the philosophic analogue of the palindromically periodic anthyphairesis of this dyad, and (c) a Platonic Idea is One in the sense of the self-similarity induced by periodic anthyphairesis. A byproduct of the above analysis is that (d) Theaetetus had obtained a proof of the Proposition: The anthyphairesis of a dyad of lines incommensurable in length only is palindromically periodic. It is further verified that the concepts and tools contained in the Theaetetean Book X of the Elements suffice for the proof of the Proposition. Outline. According to the Philebus 16c a Platonic Idea is the mixture of the two principles Infinite (‘apeiron’) and the Finite (‘peras’) (Section 2). A key step to this interpretation is the discovery, that, according to the Philebus 23b-25e, these two principles are close philosophic analogues of the concepts of finite and infinite anthyphairesis (commensurability and incommensurability, accordingly), described in Propositions 1-8 of Book X in Euclid’s Elements (Section 3).
    [Show full text]
  • The Coherence of Stoic Ontology
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Coherence of Stoic Ontology Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3wg7m1w0 Author de Harven, Vanessa Publication Date 2012 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Coherence of Stoic Ontology by Vanessa de Harven A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Prof. Dorothea Frede, Co-chair Prof. Klaus Corcilius, Co-chair Prof. A.A. Long Spring 2012 Abstract The Coherence of Stoic Ontology by Vanessa de Harven Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy University of California, Berkeley Professors Dorothea Frede and Klaus Corcilius, Co-chairs Any thoroughgoing physicalist is challenged to give an account of immaterial entities such as thoughts and mathematical objects. The Stoics, who eagerly affirmed that only bodies exist, crafted an elegant solution to this challenge: not everything that is Something (ti) exists. Rather, some things have a derivative mode of reality they call subsistence: these entities are non-existent in that they are not themselves solid bodies, but they are nonetheless Something physical because they depend on bodies for their subsistence. My dissertation uncovers the unifying principles of Stoic subsistence, and shows how they can account for thoughts and other immaterial entities without running afoul of their physicalist commitments. While all commentators agree that the Stoics posited Something as the highest category of being, they have failed to find a coherent physicalist account of Stoic ontology.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evidences of the Christian Religion, with Additional
    The Evidences of the Christian Religion, with Ad- ditional Discourses . Author(s): Addison, Joseph (1672-1719) Publisher: Grand Rapids: Christian Classics Ethereal Library Description: Although he was a celebrated playwright during the 18th century, modern English speakers remember Joseph Addison for his perfection of the English essay as a genre in his magazine, The Spectator. The Spectator would publish short papers on philosophical, theological, or other topics meant to start lively discussions among its readership. Addison left The Evidences of the Christian Religion, along with other essays, unfinished upon his death. What he did complete, however, addresses some of the very same topics other theologians and philosophers had addressed. Addison de- scribes the attributes of God as derived from rational argu- mentation, he promotes the praise of God, and finally, he defends the authority of Scripture and the immortality of the soul from the popular deistic philosophies of his day. Kathleen O'Bannon CCEL Staff i Contents Title Page 1 Prefatory Material 3 Preface 4 Introduction. 11 The Evidences of the Christian Religion. 18 Sect. I. 19 Sect. II. 22 Sect. III. 26 Sect. IV. 29 Sect. V. 31 Sect. VI. 37 Sect. VII. 40 Sect. VIII. 43 Sect. IX. 47 Additional Discourses. 50 Sect. I. Of God and His Attributes. 51 His Attributes. 57 Sect. II. The Power and Wisdom of God in the Creation. 67 Sect. III. The Providence of God. 76 Sect. IV. The Worship of God. 84 Sect. V. Advantages of Revelation Above Natural Reason. 92 Sect. VI. Excellency of the Christian Institution. 101 Sect. VII.
    [Show full text]
  • MICHAEL FREDE Michael Johannes Frede 1940–2007
    MICHAEL FREDE Michael Johannes Frede 1940–2007 WHEN MICHAEL JOHANNES FREDE died (11 August 2007), by drowning in the Corinthian Gulf at a beach near Itea below Delphi, Greece, the world of ancient philosophy lost the most accomplished philosopher and scholar, and one of the most distinguished and influential teachers, of the generation of specialists in this field internationally who began their careers in the 1960s and 1970s. He was born 31 May 1940, in Kreuzberg, a working-class district of Berlin, the first child of Roman Catholic parents (a second, Stefanie, was born several years later). He was brought up in Germany and educated there through the Ph.D. and beyond, emigrating later, first to the United States in 1971, then to the United Kingdom, where he was Professor of the History of Philosophy at Oxford University and Fellow of Keble College from 1991 until he chose to retire two years before required, in 2005. In 1943, at the age of two, the apartment building where his family lived was reduced to rubble in an Allied bombing attack while his mother had taken him out for a walk in his carriage, so the family had to move, first to Lippstadt in Westphalia and then in the early 1950s to Hamburg, where Frede attended the Sankt Ansgar-Gymnasium, a Jesuit school, studying classics and the classical languages (Abitur 1959). At university, he studied first in Munich (1959–60) then back in Hamburg (1960–2), where he became a student of Günther Patzig; he rejoined Patzig at Göttingen in 1963 to complete his Ph.D., after a momentous year (1962–3) at Oxford, on Patzig’s suggestion and with his assistance, as a visiting research student, working on his dissertation on Plato’s Sophist, in consul- tation with G.
    [Show full text]
  • Index Locorum
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-11015-1 — The Aporetic Tradition in Ancient Philosophy Edited by George Karamanolis , Vasilis Politis Index More Information Index Locorum Alcinous Anonymous Didaskalikos Theaetetus Commentary 4.6, 195 49–56, 193 Alexander of Aphrodisias Aristophanes On the Metaphysics (in Meta.) Clouds, 38 173, 27–174, 4, 239 Aristotle 200, 18–21, 236 Generation of Animals 206, 12–13, 240 716b12–13, 167 210, 20–1, 240 717a30–31, 168 212, 25–7, 242 717a5, 163 212, 27–35, 242 718a35–37, 167 213, 11–13, 243 718a36–37, 167 213, 19–23, 242 719b33–34, 168 213, 26–214, 17, 243 720b21, 163 213, 3–10, 243 728b32–4, 159 214, 24–215, 18, 244 732a32, 159 216, 8–11, 246 733b32, 160 218, 17, 240 733b32–734a4, 160 263, 26–29, 240 734a10, 161 On the Topics (in Top.) 734a11–13, 161 1.1, 17, 3, 244 734a13–14, 161 29, 23–30, 9, 233 734a14–16, 161 29, 30–31, 233 734a5–6, 161 3, 4–24, 232 734a7–8, 161 30, 12–18, 234 734a9–10, 161 30, 18–31, 4, 236 734b1–2, 161 32, 12–34, 5, 239 734b18, 162 32, 17–20, 238 734b4–7, 161 32, 22–26, 238 734b7–19, 162 458, 26–459, 3, 229 734b8–9, 161 Problems and Solutions (Quaest.) 735a29, 166 1.11, 245 735a29–736a23, 158 1.17, 245 735a5–7, 161 1.26, 245 735b7–8, 158 1.3, 245 736a24, 166 1.8, 245 738b7, 163 2.27, 243 740b2–5, 159 Suppliment to On the Soul (Mantissa) 740b2–8, 166 5, 245 740b5–8, 160 300 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-11015-1 — The Aporetic Tradition in Ancient Philosophy Edited by George Karamanolis , Vasilis Politis Index
    [Show full text]