Archivo Is a Space Dedicated to Collecting, Exhibiting and Rethinking Design in Its Various Forms

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Archivo Is a Space Dedicated to Collecting, Exhibiting and Rethinking Design in Its Various Forms About Archivo Diseño y Arquitectura Archivo is a space dedicated to collecting, exhibiting and rethinking design in its various forms. We are interested in exploring the meaning and potential of design in Mexico, as both a cultural signifier and a source of everyday innovation, with an enormous transformative power. Through a unique research collection open to the public as well as a rich, diverse program of exhibitions and activities, Archivo has estab- lished itself as a pioneering space and a fundamental reference for local architecture and design communities. Founded in 2012 by architect Fernando Romero and his wife Soumaya Slim, Archivo holds a design research collection consisting of over 1,500 design objects that cover a broad spectrum, from everyday objects of Mexican popular culture to limited editions and international design icons of the XXth and XXIst centuries. More than a simple design archive, Archivo functions as an exhibition space, a meeting place, a cultural laboratory, a forum for exchange and debate, and a key element for building knowledge and a critical approach to Mexi- can design. Archivo seeks to reaffirm the importance of design in everyday life, as an area of inquiry that integrates technical, productive, cultural and creative processes. Archivo offers a space for learning and also for critical confrontation, and is a pioneering institution in the field of design and architecture curating and research in Mexico. Archivo also wants to establish itself as a global reference for innovative approaches to the culture and practice of design. Architecture Archivo Collection Archivo is housed in a remarkable mid-century modern house built Archivo houses a design collection of over 1500 objects ranging from by artist and architect Arturo Chávez Paz, neighbouring Luis the first decades of the XXth century to the most recent innovations Barragán's own UNESCO World Heritage house and studio, in the and tendencies in design. The collection is divided in various research traditional Tacubaya neighborhood of Mexico City. Chávez Paz categories, with a particular focus on popular Mexican design and –who never finished architecture school– was an artist and illustra- everyday objects. The collection can be understood as an ABC of tor working closely for the Mexican abstractionist avant-garde with design, with the intention of bringing the public closer to the richness the likes of Mathias Goeritz and Henry Moore. He was in charge and variety of recent design history and production, both in Mexico of all the illustrations for Platería Ortega, Barragan´s first clients in and abroad. It is a living collection, that continues to grow and diversify the neighborhood, for whom he built Casa Ortega in 1943. The year after year. other only Chávez Paz building known to date is the house on the same street, Francisco Ramírez 13. Archivo also faces the former Archivo Library house of Enrique del Moral, now contemporary art gallery, LABOR. This tiny corner of the city is a little-known landmark of In October 2012, Archivo added the private library of noted Mexican Modern Mexican architecture and and important cultural destina- modernist architect Enrique del Moral –author of the La Merced tion, now known as the ¨Tacubaya Triangle¨. market and the Torre de Rectoria at the National University, among other notable buildings– to its collection open to the public. The library consists of over 1,000 books and 500 magazines, covering subjects related to philosophy, history, art and architecture. It is a particularly attractive collection for scholarly interest in Latin Ameri- can modernist architecture, urbanism, and culture. Archivo Shop Archivo Shop is a tiny showcase for the best of design made in Mexico. Just like our collection, our design tiendita and bookshop offers a hand-picked selection of design objects, ranging from popular Mexican everyday products to the work of up-and-coming designers. General Francisco Ramírez 4, Col. Ampliación Daniel Garza México D.F. 11840 T. 52 (55) 26141063 archivonline.org Visit Archivo Public Program Café Archivo Along with exhibitions and access to the collection and library, A spatial intervention by young architecture collective APRDE- Archivo hosts a rich program of activities for both the architecture LESP that links the public space of Constituyentes avenue with the and design community as well as the public at large. Every Tuesday Archivo’s garden. Visitors can not only enjoy our exhibitions, but of each month, the Actividades Archivo program offers lectures spend their time reading, relaxing or wandering around our and discussions, screenings cycles, critical work sessions and garden, fueled by a good cup of coffee. The café also provides reviewing portfolios, interventions in public spaces and other open information on activities at Archivo as well as other spaces in the events. Francisco Ramírez Cultural Corridor. Archivo Impreso and Publications Directory Archivo Impreso is our in-house, freely distributed publication, a printed companion to our exhibition cycles. The Impreso Mario Ballesteros functions as an exhibition catalog, but also condenses different Director writings and essays that directly or indirectly point to themes and [email protected] concerns related to the work of our space and design culture in Mexico. The Impreso is part of Archivo’s editorial branch that Since May 2015, Mario Ballesteros is director at Archivo Diseño y recently published its first book, Tradition vs. Modernity, edited by Arquitectura. Prior to joining Archivo, Mario was founding editor of Kristina Lee Podesva and Rodrigo Ortiz Monasterio, printed by Domus Mexico, Director of Communications at the Laboratorio para Guayaba Press with support from Chicago’s Graham Foundation. la Ciudad –a public innovation lab of the Mexico City Government– editor at Actar Publishers, curator for the Design Hub Barcelona, head Guided Tours of Communications and Digital Platforms at the Barcelona Institute of Architecture (BIArch), editor at Quaderns, and editorial advisor to Archivo offers guided tours for groups and schools. If you want to the Strelka Institute for Media and Architecture in Moscow. He is schedule a guided tour, please contact us at [email protected] currently also a founding partner at Andamio, and independent cultural and editorial consultancy focused on architecture and design, and teaches design criticism at CENTRO. Special Events Archivo Diseño y Arquitectura is a non-profit organization, and we Luis Felipe Sánchez occasionally offer our spaces for private events. If you are interested Coordinador de exposiciones in hosting your event at Archivo, please contact [email protected] [email protected] Fabiola García Location and opening hours Coordinadora de comunicación y alianzas [email protected] General Francisco Ramírez 4 Col. Ampliación Daniel Garza Monday through Friday 10:00-18:00 h Saturday 10:00-14:00 h Fernando Farfán Free entrance Comunicación visual [email protected] archivo_d_a_ Adriana Hernández archivo_d_a_ Asistente de biblioteca y acervo archivodisenoyarquitectura [email protected] General Francisco Ramírez 4, Col. Ampliación Daniel Garza México D.F. 11840 T. 52 (55) 26141063 archivonline.org.
Recommended publications
  • Arquitecto Y Humanista
    50 Nuestros maestros Marcial Gutiérrez Camarena: Arquitecto y humanista Cecilia Gutiérrez Arriola Académica del Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas de la UNAM igura predominante en el ámbito de la docencia de la arqui- el periodo virreinal. Su infancia transcurre en la ciudad de Tepic, tectura y la vida académica de la Escuela Nacional de Ar- adonde se muda la familia en busca de una mejor economía, en quitectura de los años cuarenta, a Marcial Gutiérrez tiempos en que el porfiriato agonizaba y estallaba la lucha arma- Camarena aún se le recuerda porque fue un hombre comprome- da. En noviembre de 1919, junto con su hermano Alberto, se tras- tido con su profesión y un universitario entregado a la transmi- ladó a la Ciudad de México, emprendiendo la dificil aventura de sión del conocimiento. dejar la tierra natal y trabajar para poder estudiar. Hizo el ba- Participe de una brillante y privilegiada generación que se chillerato en el Colegio Francés Morelos, de los Maristas, y en formó bajo la égida del padre del Movimiento Moderno y del 1923, ingresó a la Escuela Nacional de Bellas Artes, en la vieja gran maestro que fue José Villagrán García, grupo que trascen- Academia de San Carlos, que ya estaba incorporada a la Uni- dió no sólo por el sino por la huella que marcó con sus propues- versidad Nacional, para estudiar la carrera de arquitectura, tas funcionalistas en la arquitectura mexicana. cuando la ciudad de México empezaba a vivir grandes momen- Nació en San Blas, Nayarit, en febrero de1898, cuando su pa- tos en la educación y la cultura, propiciados por el ministro Jo- dre trabajaba para la Casa de comercio Lanzagorta y fungía como sé Vasconcelos.
    [Show full text]
  • Title: the Avant-Garde in the Architecture and Visual Arts of Post
    1 Title: The avant-garde in the architecture and visual arts of Post-Revolutionary Mexico Author: Fernando N. Winfield Architecture_media_politics_society. vol. 1, no.3. November 2012 Mexico City / Portrait of an Architect with the City as Background. Painting by Juan O´Gorman (1949). Museum of Modern Art, Mexico. Commenting on an exhibition of contemporary Mexican architecture in Rome in 1957, the polemic and highly influential Italian architectural critic and historian, Bruno Zevi, ridiculed Mexican modernism for combining Pre-Columbian motifs with modern architecture. He referred to it as ‘Mexican Grotesque.’1 Inherent in Zevi’s comments were an attitude towards modern architecture that defined it in primarily material terms; its principle role being one of “spatial and programmatic function.” Despite the weight of this Modernist tendency in the architectural circles of Post-Revolutionary Mexico, we suggest in this paper that Mexican modernism cannot be reduced to such “material” definitions. In the highly charged political context of Mexico in the first half of the twentieth century, modern architecture was perhaps above all else, a tool for propaganda. ARCHITECTURE_MEDIA_POLITICS_SOCIETY Vol. 1, no.3. November 2012 1 2 In this political atmosphere it was undesirable, indeed it was seen as impossible, to separate art, architecture and politics in a way that would be a direct reflection of Modern architecture’s European manifestations. Form was to follow function, but that function was to be communicative as well as spatial and programmatic. One consequence of this “political communicative function” in Mexico was the combination of the “mural tradition” with contemporary architectural design; what Zevi defined as “Mexican Grotesque.” In this paper, we will examine the political context of Post-Revolutionary Mexico and discuss what may be defined as its most iconic building; the Central Library at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Capítulo V Las Nuevas Ideas
    CAPÍTULO V LAS NUEVAS IDEAS 316 5.1 La sombra del Movimiento Moderno Tras la caída de los caudillos, el nuevo régimen institucional ve en el modelo racionalista una respuesta a la imagen de progreso y contemporaneidad buscada. El nuevo modelo además -con sus propuestas metodologicas-, es idóneo para atacar necesidades masivas, así el naciente racionalismo encuentra en el Estado mexicano a un gran aliado. El nuevo Estado, con los intelectuales e industriales de su lado, impulsa a la arquitectura racionalista y va a ser en la propia capital -eje de las decisiones-, donde aparecen las primeras manifestaciones de ese nuevo orden; en la periferia hay reticencia y el Tolteca, núm. 1. 1929. Portada. revival tienen continuidad y sólo más adelante se sumaran a la modernidad. La revista Tolteca persigue los mismos fines que su antecesora Cemento aunque prescinde de datos de carácter técnico y no profundiza en sus discursos. Con ello, su radio de difusión es mayor. Aparece en 1929 y muestra en su primer portada1 elementos de carácter futurista, la idea del maquinismo y la fuerza del hombre son conceptos que van ganando adeptos, acorde con las manifestaciones industriales que están apareciendo en esos momentos en México. Destaca en su primer número el llamado Palacio de Policía y Bomberos en la ciudad Edificio para policías y bomberos. capital, realizado por los arquitectos Guillermo Zárraga y 1928. Vicente Mendiola. Fuente: González Gortázar, Fernando. La Vicente Mendiola, edificio de sofisticada geometría arquitectura mexicana del siglo XX, CONACULTA, México, 1994, p. tendiente a la verticalidad. 39. Pero no sólo las grandes construcciones son 1 Tolteca (México D.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews
    BOOK REVIEWS influence in the construction of the modern TheCarioca School and the Paulista School. architectonic discourse through the exhibi- Comas, guest curator to the exhibition, writes tions Latin American Architecture since 1945 about the similarities and differences of the (1955) and Brazil Builds (1943) setting the two groups of architects and planners that current exhibition at the same level of its pre- shaped Brazil into its modern suit. He intel- decessors, announcing the making of ongoing ligently analyzes them through architectural historiography: “An exhibition and publica- elements and purposes that lets the text tion that function as an ongoing laboratory disseminate and weave both schools inside for constructing new histories” (p. 15). the concepts. Foundation, rule, continuity, Barry Bergdoll’s “Learning from Latin divergence, balance and extension are the America: Public Space, Housing and Land- methods to evolution within the time-frame scape” excels by far the other texts in the of the life span of the modern architects and book. His last exhibition inside the institution their buildings. Latin America in Construction: had to amalgamate his academic DNa with The last individual essay is by Jorge Architecture 1955 - 1980 the precise coordinating skills that require Francisco Liernur, also guest curator, who the heavy machinery of professional research addresses a more contextual piece of writing. Edited by Barry Bergdoll, teams in more than ten countries in Latin He searches for a correlation between Carlos Eduardo Comas, America. It is a grand-finale that sets the bar architecture and new general conditions of Jorge Francisco Liernur, Patricio del Real high in terms of ambition, inventiveness and modernization.
    [Show full text]
  • Plastic Integration in Mexico: Confluence Or Nostalgia
    Plastic Integration in Mexico: Confluence or Nostalgia 14 docomomo · 42 — Summer 2010 doco42—1/52.indd 14 11/08/10 15:59 rom the onset of contemporary architecture, the controversial presence of visual arts manifested F itself as one of the approaches in its development. In the mid-twentieth century the use of the term “plastic integration” started to be widespread, exposing the confrontation between diverse stances and positions. Three of the pioneers in the forefront of this field were Carlos Obregón Santacilia, with his building for the Secretaría de Salubridad (1929), Mario Pani, with the Hotel Reforma (1936), and Enrique Yáñez, with the Sindicato Mexicano de Electricistas (1936–1940). The movement, headed by the leading architects of the time in collaboration with important artists, searched for an intersection between the visual arts and architecture. By Louise Noelle ROM the onset of contemporary architecture, the qualified by human imagination, but imagination giving controversial presence of visual arts manifested it- natural pattern to structure.”5 F self as one of the approaches in its development. Returning to Mexico, it is precise to clarify that the term In the mid–twentieth century the use of the term “plastic “Plastic Integration” (Integración Plástica) is coined mid- integration” became widespread, exposing the confron- way through the twentieth century, even thought there are tation between diverse stances and positions. At the same examples from before this date. This movement, headed time, a series of questions arose regarding the final results by the main architects of the time, proposed to achieve of a work shared between architects and artists, as the the coupling between the visual arts and architectural result of such a collaboration did not always meet a suc- works.
    [Show full text]
  • Place Or Myth, University City Campus of Unam in Mexico City
    PLACE OR MYTH, UNIVERSITY CITY CAMPUS OF UNAM IN MEXICO CITY CELIA ESTHER ARREDONDO ZAMBRANO Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, Campus Monterrey [email protected] Abstract The University Campus of UNAM in Mexico City, also known as CU was constructed as a 20th century example of a modern city during the 1950’s, on a lava covered landscape near the pre-Hispanic ruins of Cuicuilco. Its importance has always being linked with its past and its nationalistic calling. Therefore, beside the physical construction of this campus, there was also a mythical construction of its meaning, that connects its present existence with its past, determined by the place or site where it is located and the historical conditions of Mexico’s modernization. By way of the Spirit of Place, this analysis wishes to reflect on the true connections between the Genius Loci of the CU’s physical site and history, and the construction of its meaning, using a poststructuralist and a phenomenological approach. 1. The Place Located in the southern part of Mexico City, the University Campus of UNAM commonly known as CU is nestled in the lava rocks produced by the eruption of the Xitle volcano, 600 B.C. This surreal landscape of exotic plants, black rocks and soil, once referred to as a pais maldito or damned country or land was recognized and admired for its beauty by painters like Diego Rivera, Dr. Atl, José Clemente Orozco, architects like Luis Barragán and photographers like Armando Salas Portugal. Here 730 hectares of volcanic rock were transformed into a modern university campus.
    [Show full text]
  • Clara Porset a Modern Designer for Mexico
    Clara Porset A Modern Designer for Mexico 54 docomomo 46 — 2012/1 docomomo46.indd 54 25/07/12 11:13 he idea of design came about, following various approaches, at the end of the 1920s in the last century. The design and production of furniture and household appliances, as part of the Twork of a specialist, is an experience that evolved from the Bauhaus and wanted “to serve in the development of present day housing, from the simplest household appliance to the finished dwelling”1, as Walter Gropius explained in 1927 in the Principles of Bauhaus Production. Other architects like Hugo Haring, in 1927, talked about “objects that are on the one hand works of art, and on the other are intended for use”2, while 24 architects headed by Le Corbusier founded the CIAM in 1928 and sated “the need for a new conception of architecture that satisfies the spiritual, intellectual and material demands of present day life”.3 This was the atmosphere laid out by the avant–garde movements in Europe when Clara Porset arrived in Paris to pursue her graduate stud- ies in art and architecture. By Louise Noelle lara María del Carmen Magdalena Porset y for knowledge in the field of what we now call Indus- Dumas was born in Matanzas, Cuba, on May trial Design: the Bauhaus. She got in contact with Walter 25, 1895. 4 She had a privileged childhood that Gropius to study under his guidance, but unfortunately it C 6 disembogued in her attending Manhattanville Academy was 1933, the year that the school was dissolved.
    [Show full text]
  • Casablanca Chandigarh: Opportunities to Exercise Their Professions, Modern Planning and Forums for the Exchange of Ideas
    EDITORIAL 02 LC′s Poetic Endurance 40 La Villa Savoye after Le Corbusier, Time and Space — Light and Matter une Longue Histoire ! BY SUSANNA CACCIA GHERARDINI ! BY ANA TOSTÕES AND CARLO OLMO 48 The Restoration of the Paintings of Le Corbusier in the Villa E-1027, Roquebrune-Cap-Martin, Alpes Maritimes ! BY MARIE5ODILE HUBERT LECTURE 56 Renovation and Restructuring the 04 On Collective Form Cité de Refuge by Le Corbusier ! BY FUMIHIKO MAKI and Pierre Jeanneret. Preserving the Dual Functional and Architectural Identity of the Masterpiece ! BY GILLES RAGOT 64 The Couvent de La Tourette from 1960 to the present day. 53 – 2015/2 Future Discernibility of Past Interventions ! BY ROBERTA GRIGNOLO 74 National Museum of Western Art ESSAYS as Important Cultural Property of Japan: its Evolution and Historical Value 12 The Role of the Fondation Le Corbusier ! BY YOSHIYUKI YAMANA in the Conservation of the Le Corbusier′s AND KYO FUKUDA Architectural Work ! BY BÉNÉDICTE GANDINI Contents docomomo AND MICHEL RICHARD 18 Restoration of the Petite Maison , Corseaux, 1924, 84 HERITAGE IN DANGER Le Corbusier and Pierre Jeanneret. Construction Practice as Research ! BY FRANZ GRAF AND GIULIA MARINO 86 NEWS 26 The villa Le Lac by Le Corbusier and Pierre Jeanneret 90 BOOK REVIEWS at Corseaux-sous-Vevey. The Color Rediscovered ! BY ELISE KOERING 32 Maison Curutchet , La Plata, Argentina 96 APPENDIX ! BY JORGE NÉSTOR BOZZANO AND JULIO SANTANA Le Corbusier, Capitol mural painting, Chandigarh, India, 1962. © Ana Tostões, 2013. EDITORIAL LC′s Poetic Endurance Time and Space — Light and Matter ANA TOSTÕES Chair of docomomo International Ie theme of this LMrd docomomo Journal is () — +, Years consulted on a daily basis by researchers worldwide, the After .
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley CLAS Working Papers
    UC Berkeley CLAS Working Papers Title Mythical Terrain and the Building of Mexico’s UNAM Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2r0461n3 Author Davids, René Publication Date 2008-10-02 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California W O R Center for Latin American Studies K University of California, Berkeley I Mythical Terrain and the Building N of Mexico’s UNAM G René Davids Professor of Architecture and Urban Design University of California, Berkeley P October 2008 Paper No. 23 A P E R S clas.berkeley.edu 2334 Bowditch Street Berkeley, CA 94720 Copyright © 2008, the Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved by the Regents of the University of California. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior permission in writing from the publisher. ISSN #1552-7611. CONTENTS Mythical Terrain and the Building of Mexico’s UNAM �����������������������������������������������������������������1 The Mexicanness of the CU �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������11 Conclusion ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������12 Endnotes �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������14 DSFLGKFDLG;KDF;LGK MYTHICAL TERRAIN AND THE BUILDING OF MEXICo’s UNAM Recent trends in global capitalism have transformed
    [Show full text]
  • Reflectionsjourn41986univ.Pdf
    Reflections The Journal of the School of Architecture University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Vol. 4, No. 1 Fall 1986 Reflections The Journal of the School of Architecture University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Vol. 4 No. 1 Fall 1986 Board of Editors Reflections is a journal dedicated to theory and R. Alan Forrester, Director criticism. The Board of Editors of Reflections School of Architecture welcomes unsolicited contributions. All submissions will be reviewed by the Board of Editors. Authors Johann Albrecht, Chairman take full responsibility for securing required con- sents and releases and for the authenticity of their Michael J. Andrejasich, Acting Chairman, Managing Editor articles. Botond Bognar Henry S. Plummer Address all correspondence to; Robert G. Ousterhout Reflections Ronald Schmitt The Journal of the School of Architecture Robert 1. Selby University of Illinois 608 E. Lorado Taft Drive Board of Advisors Champaign, IL 61820 A. Richard Williams, FAIA Claude A. Winkelhake Art Director and Production Coordinator Darin W. Collier Montage James McKay Copy Editor Carol Betts © 1986 by The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois Printed in the United States of America ISSN: 07399448 Contents New York City Hall: Architecture and Civic Authority Barbara B. Mooney Infill Housing: The Forum for Negotiation Ken Lambla Contemporary Mexican Architecture: The Search for a National Expression Arif Quireshi Has Functionalism Triumphed? The Destruction of Paul Rudolph's Christian Science Building Lydia M. Soo and Bobert Ousterhout The Ground of Creation: Studies toward an Architecture of Indeterminate Action Henry S. Plummer The Interplay of Open Spaces and Buildings Bobert Mugerauer Charleston and Savannah: Discovery Through Comparison Neil Sheehan A Critical Afterthought; Participation in Design Authors Reflection (ri flek shen) n.
    [Show full text]
  • W O R K I N G P a P E
    W O R Center for Latin American Studies K University of California, Berkeley I Mythical Terrain and the Building N of Mexico’s UNAM G René Davids Professor of Architecture and Urban Design University of California, Berkeley P October 2008 Paper No. 23 A P E R S clas.berkeley.edu 2334 Bowditch Street Berkeley, CA 94720 Copyright © 2008, the Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved by the Regents of the University of California. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior permission in writing from the publisher. ISSN #1552-7611. CONTENTS Mythical Terrain and the Building of Mexico’s UNAM �����������������������������������������������������������������1 The Mexicanness of the CU �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������11 Conclusion ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������12 Endnotes �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������14 DSFLGKFDLG;KDF;LGK MYTHICAL TERRAIN AND THE BUILDING OF MEXICo’s UNAM Recent trends in global capitalism have transformed the university into a corporation interested in the production of “excellence” rather than a representation of the national state�1 In the late 1940s, however, Latin American states were heavily invested in the building of new universities that would help to promote
    [Show full text]
  • Villagrán Intro
    Mexican modernist architects were deeply involved in the preservation of the country’s cultural heritage at least a generation before the Mexican state formally promulgated legislation defending the country’s patrimony. As early as the 1910s, in conjunction with the Mexican revolution, a critical reassessment of the country’s architectural past began, focusing especially on the viceregal period (sixteenth through nineteenth centuries). Modern architects in Mexico City, particularly José Villagrán García (1901-1982), his disciple Enrique del Moral (1905- 1987), and others associated with the School of Architecture of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma, advocated for the preservation of historic buildings, taking them as architectural expressions national character and as lessons for modern designers to drawn upon. Many modernist architects in Europe and the Americas theorized modernism in terms of continuity rather than rupture with historical precedents. While their desire to insert their work within the framework of historic buildings was eloquently articulated in theory, in practice they were often denied the opportunity to work on historic buildings by preservation authorities. In this essay, Villagrán argued that an “authentic theory of monument restoration” had to open itself up to the work of modernist architects. Part of a series of lectures delivered at Colegio Nacional in Mexico City in 1966, the weight that this essay carried both in Mexico and abroad cannot be overstated. It came from a recognized master, acknowledged internationally as the father of Modern Mexican architecture, who designed what is widely regarded as the first modernist building in Mexico, the Granja Sanitaria de Popotla (1925). He had just designed important modernist office buildings in Mexico City, as well as the School of Architecture and the Art Museum in the Ciudad Universitaria’s modernist campus (1951).
    [Show full text]