Samtrans Draft Youth Mobility Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Samtrans Draft Youth Mobility Plan SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT SamTrans Youth Mobility Plan FINAL AUGUST 2, 2017 YOUTH MOBILITY PLAN SamTrans TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements .....................................................................................6 Executive Summary ......................................................................................... 7 1 Introduction ........................................................................................... 14 Purpose of Youth Mobility Plan ..................................................................14 SamTrans Bus Services and Service Area ....................................................15 Regional Context .......................................................................................18 Study Contents ..........................................................................................25 2 Existing Conditions ................................................................................ 26 Youth Demographics .................................................................................26 Schools in San Mateo County .....................................................................28 Population and School Enrollment Projections ............................................29 SamTrans Youth Transit Services and Fares ...............................................32 Other School Transportation Services ........................................................38 3 Trends in Youth Travel............................................................................ 40 Travel Behavior of American Youth ............................................................40 Setting the Stage for Adult Transit Use ......................................................40 Technology and Choice .............................................................................42 San Mateo County Trends ..........................................................................42 4 Outreach and Surveying .......................................................................... 55 Youth Focus Groups ..................................................................................55 Parent Questionnaire .................................................................................62 Other Outreach and Survey Efforts .............................................................67 5 Potential Youth Initiatives ....................................................................... 71 SamTrans Organizational Improvements ....................................................71 Fare Options ..............................................................................................74 Marketing and Technology ........................................................................80 Bus Operational Improvements ..................................................................83 6 Initiative Screening and Outcomes ........................................................... 87 Screening Criteria ......................................................................................87 Screening Outcomes ..................................................................................90 Cost/Benefit Analysis ................................................................................92 7 Recommendations and Phasing ............................................................... 95 Advancing to Implementation ....................................................................95 Phased Approach to Implementation .........................................................99 1 YOUTH MOBILITY PLAN SamTrans Interrelation of Initiatives.........................................................................103 Measuring Initiative Effectiveness ............................................................104 8 Conclusion ........................................................................................... 105 9 Appendices .......................................................................................... 109 2 YOUTH MOBILITY PLAN SamTrans FIGURES Figure 1: Youth Ridership Frequency ..................................................................8 Figure 2: Fare Payment on School-Related Routes by County Area .....................9 Figure 3: SamTrans Bus Route Map (San Mateo County) ....................................16 Figure 4: SamTrans Bus Route Map (Downtown San Francisco Service) ..............17 Figure 5: Under 18 Population Densities, San Mateo County .............................19 Figure 6: Median Household Income by Census Tract, San Mateo County .........20 Figure 7: Percent of Students Eligible for Free and Reduced Price Meals during the 2014-2015 school year, San Mateo County...................21 Figure 8: Zero-car Households by Census Tract, San Mateo County .................23 Figure 9: Minority Population by Census Tract, San Mateo County ....................24 Figure 10: San Mateo County Youth Population by Age Group ..........................26 Figure 11: Language Spoken at Home by Youth SamTrans Passengers .............27 Figure 12: Ethnic Background of SamTrans Passengers ....................................27 Figure 13: Historic and Projected Population of 12 to 14 Year-Olds in San Mateo County ................................................................................29 Figure 14: Historic and Projected Population of 15 to 18 Year-Olds in San Mateo County ................................................................................30 Figure 15: Historic and Projected Population of 19 to 24 Year-Olds in San Mateo County ................................................................................30 Figure 16: Historic and Projected Public School Enrollment in San Mateo County ...........................................................................................31 Figure 17: Youth Ridership Frequency ..............................................................43 Figure 18: Youth Trip Purposes ........................................................................45 Figure 19: Youth Ridership and Fare Payment Distribution by Month ................46 Figure 20: Youth Ridership on North County Regular Routes ............................48 Figure 21: Weekday Ridership (Averaged Over 12 Months) and Fare Payment Type on North County School-Related Routes ................................49 Figure 22: Weekday Ridership (Averaged Over 12 Months) and Fare Payment Type on Mid-County Routes ..........................................................50 Figure 23: Weekday Ridership (Averaged Over 12 Months) and Fare Payment Type on Mid-County School-Related Routes ..................................51 Figure 24: Weekday Ridership (Averaged Over 12 Months) and Fare Payment Type on South County Routes ........................................................52 3 YOUTH MOBILITY PLAN SamTrans Figure 25: Average Weekday Ridership (Averaged Over 12 Months) and Fare Payment Type on South County School-Related Routes ..................52 Figure 26: Fare Payment on School-Related Routes by County Area .................53 Figure 27: Total ECR Weekday Boardings per Month ........................................54 Figure 28: Weekday Split in Non-Clipper Youth Fare Payment on ECR in 2016 ..54 Figure 29: Focus Group Participants by Age .....................................................58 Figure 30: Type of School Attended by Children of Parent Questionnaire Participants ....................................................................................63 Figure 31: “How Did You Pay for Transit Last Semester?” from Half Moon Bay Respondents ..................................................................................69 Figure 32: “How Did You Pay for Transit Last Semester?” from South San Francisco Respondents ..................................................................70 Figure 33: Snapchat Spectacles ........................................................................97 TABLES Table 1: Potential Youth Mobility Initiatives ......................................................12 Table 2: Projections of Community College Enrollment in San Mateo County ....32 Table 3: Summary of School-Related SamTrans Routes ....................................33 Table 4: Summary of Routes Serving Community Colleges ...............................36 Table 5: SamTrans Fare Table ..........................................................................37 Table 6: Average Weekday Ridership by Summer Youth Pass Holders ...............47 Table 7: Youth Program Participants Invited to Participate in Outreach .............56 Table 8: Youth Mobility Plan Focus Groups .......................................................57 Table 9: Questionnaire Response Rates ............................................................64 Table 10: Evaluation Framework and Criteria ....................................................87 Table 11: Overall Scoring Scale ........................................................................88 Table 12: Scoring Scale: Resources Required ....................................................88 Table 13: Scoring Scale: Market Capture ..........................................................89 Table 14: Scoring Scale: Ease of Implementation ..............................................89 Table 15: Overall Scoring Thresholds ...............................................................90 Table 16: Screening Outcomes by Initiative ......................................................91 Table 17: Qualitative Cost/Benefit Analysis – Recommended
Recommended publications
  • 2017-2026 Samtrans Short Range Transit Plan
    SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT Short-Range Transit Plan Fiscal Years 2017 – 2026 May 3, 2017 Acknowledgements San Mateo County Transit District Board of Directors 2017 Rose Guilbault, Chair Charles Stone, Vice Chair Jeff Gee Carole Groom Zoe Kersteen-Tucker Karyl Matsumoto Dave Pine Josh Powell Peter Ratto Senior Staff Michelle Bouchard, Chief Operating Officer, Rail Michael Burns, Interim Chief Officer, Caltrain Planning / CalMod April Chan, Chief Officer, Planning, Grants, and Transportation Authority Jim Hartnett, General Manager/CEO Kathleen Kelly, Interim Chief Financial Officer / Treasurer Martha Martinez, Executive Officer, District Secretary, Executive Administration Seamus Murphy, Chief Communications Officer David Olmeda, Chief Operating Officer, Bus Mark Simon, Chief of Staff Short Range Transit Plan Project Staff and Contributors Douglas Kim, Director, Planning Lindsey Kiner, Senior Planner, Planning David Pape, Planner, Planning Margo Ross, Director of Transportation, Bus Transportation Karambir Cheema, Deputy Director ITS, Bus Transportation Ana Rivas, South Base Superintendent, Bus Transportation Ladi Millard, Director of Budgets, Finance Ryan Hinchman, Manager Financial Planning & Analysis, Finance Donald G. Esse, Senior Operations Financial Analyst, Bus Operations Leslie Fong, Senior Administrative Analyst, Grants Tina Dubost, Manager, Accessible Transit Services Natalie Chi, Bus Maintenance Contract Administrator, Bus Transportation Joan Cassman, Legal Counsel (Hanson Bridgett) Shayna M. van Hoften, Legal Counsel (Hanson
    [Show full text]
  • SAMTRANS CORRESPONDENCE As of 12-11-2020
    SAMTRANS CORRESPONDENCE as of 12-11-2020 December 8, 2020 The Honorable Gavin Newsom Governor, State of California State Capitol, Suite 1173 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Governor Newsom: Bay Area transit systems continue to struggle in the face of dramatically reduced ridership and revenues due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This challenge was already the most significant crisis in the history of public transportation, and now it has persisted far longer than any of us would have predicted. Since the beginning, our workers have been on the front lines, doing their jobs as essential workers, responsible for providing other front line workers with a way to safely travel to and from essential jobs. Now that the availability of a vaccine is on the horizon, we are proud to echo the attached call from the Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU). Specifically, we urge you to work to ensure that transit, paratransit, and school transportation workers are prioritized along with other essential workers to receive the vaccine following the critical need to vaccinate the State’s healthcare workers. Even with reduced ridership, an average of 8 million monthly riders continue to depend on Bay Area transit services. These riders are the healthcare workers, grocery clerks, caregivers, emergency services personnel and others doing the critical work that has kept California functioning during the pandemic. They cannot continue to do so without access to reliable public transportation, and are therefore dependent on the health of the transit workers that serve them every day. Our agencies have worked hard to ensure the public health of riders and transit workers during this crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015-2016 Measures M & O Audit
    SAN MATEO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT MEASURE M AND O GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND FUNDS SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA FINANCIAL AND PERFORMANCE AUDIT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016 JAMES MARTA & COMPANY LLP CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 701 HOWE AVENUE, E3 SACRAMENTO, CA (916) 993-9494 (916) 993-9489 FAX WWW.JPMCPA.COM SAN MATEO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT MEASURE M AND O GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND FUNDS TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT 1 BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Balance Sheet 3 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance 4 Notes to the Financial Statements 5 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Full Text of Bond Measure M and O 12 OTHER INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORTS Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and on Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards 24 Independent Auditor’s Report on Measure M and O Bond Performance 27 James Marta & Company LLP Certified Public Accountants Accounting, Auditing, Consulting, and Tax INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT Citizen’s Oversight Committee and Governing Board San Mateo Union High School District San Mateo, California Report on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying Balance Sheet of San Mateo Union High School District (the District), Measure M and O General Obligation Bond Funds (the Fund), and the related statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balance as of and for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, and the related notes to the financial statements. Managements Responsibility for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
    [Show full text]
  • San Mateo High School District Keys in on Security
    San Mateo High School District keys in on security At the San Mateo Union High School District, a combination of relatively simple but effective access control solutions protects students, teachers and staff with minimal system management requirements. The District includes a total of six comprehensive high schools, one continuation high school and a large adult school. Six of the schools each have an average student body of 1,600, while one is smaller with approximately 350 students. Average campus size is 40 acres, and together the area of the district’s buildings totals about one million square feet. The District controls door access with a Schlage Everest patent-protected key system. Keys are only available to authorized individuals through professional locksmith channels, which helps prevent unauthorized key duplication, and the keyway is exclusive to the District within a specified geographic area. An important security feature is the use of Schlage locks that have a San Mateo High School is one of seven Classroom Security Function. This allows an individual to immediately high schools and several other buildings in California’s San Mateo Union High lock a door from inside with a key, eliminating exposure outside the School District. classroom in a hostile intruder situation. The ability to key-lock from inside the classroom allows the teacher to control access and egress in an emergency and prevents the compromise that could occur with an inside pushbutton or thumbturn latch. Todd Lee, of Greystone West Company, the District’s construction manager, explains that the locks (sometimes referred to as “Columbine” locks because of their development in response to that tragedy) were installed here proactively and have proved their effectiveness in periodic drills as well as in an actual lockdown incident.
    [Show full text]
  • San Mateo County Paratransit Rider's Guide
    HOW TO USE REDI-WHEELS AND REDICOAST San Mateo County Paratransit Rider’s Guide OCTOBER 2019 EDITION HOW TO USE REDI-WHEELS AND REDICOAST San Mateo County Paratransit Rider’s Guide To request a copy of this guide in an accessible format, please call 1-800-660-4287 This information is also available at www.samtrans.com/Accessibility ABOUT REDI-WHEELS AND REDICOAST ADA Paratransit is for persons with disabilities who cannot independently use regular bus service some of the time or all of the time. The San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans) provides ADA paratransit service using Redi-Wheels on the Bayside of the county and RediCoast on the Coastside. Trips must be scheduled at least one day in advance. The purpose of this guide is to enable San Mateo County paratransit riders, their families, and advocates to become familiar with the paratransit services offered by Redi-Wheels and RediCoast and to help ensure that our customers enjoy the best riding experience we can provide. The information contained in this guide is divided into sections by topic, and is listed in a table of contents beginning on the following page. Please note that Redi-Wheels and RediCoast policies are subject to change without notice. Experienced customers should review this guide carefully, as some sections and policies have changed. All SamTrans buses are accessible, and many persons with disabilities are able to use the regular fixed-route bus service. However, if you are unable to use accessible fixed-route transit for some or all of your trips, you may be eligible for paratransit.
    [Show full text]
  • Solano Express Bus Routes Transit Information Pleasant Hill Station Area Contra Costa Centre
    Fare Information effective January 1, 2016 Senior3 Adult/ (65+) Youth2 County Connection & (6-64) For more detailed information about BART Disabled service, please see the BART Schedule, BART 1 Transit CASH FARES (exact change only) Regional Transit Map System Map, and other BART information REGIONAL TRANSIT DIAGRAM displays in this station. Regular Ride $2.00 $1.00 To To Express Ride (900 series route numbers) $2.25 $1.00 Eureka Clearlake Information Mendocino Transit DOWNTOWN AREA TRANSIT CONNECTIONS PREPAID FARES Authority To Ukiah Lake Oakland ® 4 $2.00 $1.00 Mendocino Transit 12th Street Oakland City Center BART: Clipper Cash Value Greyhound BART, AC Transit 19th Street Oakland BART: 5 $3.75 $1.75 BART, AC Transit Day Pass Cloverdale San Francisco Yolobus To Davis Discount Regular/Express 20-Ride Pass N/A $15.00 Civic Center/UN Plaza BART: Winters BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans Commuter Card (20 Regular+BART Transfer-Rides) $40.00 N/A Pleasant Hill 101 Embarcadero BART & Ferry Terminal: BART, Golden Gate Transit, Muni, SamTrans, Baylink, Alameda/Oakland Ferry, Alameda Harbor Faireld and 6 $60.00 N/A Healdsburg Bay Ferry, Blue & Gold Fleet, Amtrak CA Thruway Suisun Transit East Bay Regional Local 31-Day Transit To Sacramento Mongomery Street BART: Healdsburg BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans Dixon 6 $70.00 N/A Calistoga Readi- County Connection (CCCTA) effective January 1, 2016 East Bay Regional Express 31-Day Handi Powell Street BART: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Fare Information Station Area Ride BART Red* Ticket
    [Show full text]
  • Mobility Board
    MOBILITY Sonoma CIRCULATIONCounty AND CONGESTION RANKING Solano Solano County Sacramento Grizzly County Bay County Suisun Bay San Crockett Pablo Port Bay Costa Rodeo Bay Clyde Bethel Point Island ·|}þ4 Mountain Vine Hill PITTSBURG HERCULES View ·|}þ4 ·|}þ160 Sandmound Montalvin e §80 Manor ¨¦ Slough PINOLE MARTINEZ San SAN Pacheco CONCORD El Sobrante OAKLEY Joaquin PABLO ·|}þ242 ANTIOCH County NorthRollingwood Alhambra Ayers Richmond Valley Ranch Knightsen East Richmond PLEASANT Briones Heights Reliez HILL CLAYTON San Pablo 580 Briones Valley ¨¦§ RICHMOND Reservoir Reservoir BRENTWOOD EL Contra WALNUT CERRITO Costa CREEK Centre ·|}þ4 Kensington Shell North Acalanes Ridge Ridge Gate Discovery ·|}þ24 Bay LAFAYETTE Saranap San Morgan CastleMiguel Mt. Diablo Territory State Park ORINDA Hill Byron San Francisco Alamo Bay MORAGA 4567J4 ¨¦§680 Clifton Diablo e Court Canyon Forebay Los Vaqueros DANVILLE Blackhawk Reservoir San Camino Francisco Tassajara SAN Amtrak Stations Urban Limit Line RAMON e Incorporated City Dougherty County Airports Valley Bay Area Congestion Ranking Norris BART Stations Canyon #2: I-80 westbound, AM BART Route #5: SR 4 eastbound, PM Railroads #10: I-680 northbound, PM 0 2.5 5 10 Trails Alameda County Freeway Miles ° Source: Contra Costa County, 2019; PlaceWorks, 2019. Source: Contra Costa County, 2019; PlaceWorks, 2019. Circulation and Congestion Ranking HOW DO PEOPLE GET AROUND IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY? FREEWAYS BART AMTRAK LOCAL AND REGIONAL BUSES Transportation Routes Antioch Line AC Transit, WestCAT, County Connection, I-80, I-680, I-580, Richmond Line (Central and East Capitol Corridor San Joaquin Line Tri-Delta Transit, SolTrans, Vine Transit, SR 24, SR 4, SR 160, and SR 242 (West Contra Costa) Contra Costa) LAVTA, and Golden Gate Transit Connections San Jose and Local, Regional, and State Region Central Valley Local and Regional Sacramento Almost one-quarter of Contra Costa residents commute for more than one hour each way.
    [Show full text]
  • School Facility Improvement Planning for 2020 San Mateo Union High School District
    School Facility Improvement Planning for 2020 San Mateo Union High School District The San Mateo Union High School District provides a high-quality education to high school students in Foster City, San Mateo, Burlingame, Hillsborough, Millbrae and San Bruno. Our students graduate prepared to excel in college and compete in today’s competitive job market. For almost 20 years SMUHSD has implemented a methodical program to renovate aging school facilities and construct new ones to protect the safety of our students and provide the best possible learning environment. Although some of our schools have been updated or replaced, other aging classrooms, labs and school facilities require repairs, updates and improvements. Student Safety and Basic Repairs Maintaining student safety is our top priority, and we are committed to ensuring that each of our schools have updated security features. Our schools need improved security cameras and communication systems for emergencies. In addition, hazardous materials, like encapsulated asbestos, need to be removed, and fire alarms need to be upgraded to meet current safety standards. Modern Classrooms to Support Distinctive Educational Experiences Technology evolves rapidly. In some of our schools, academic technology and infrastructure have not been updated in 25 years. Classrooms, labs, and electrical systems need to be improved to meet today’s academic standards. Identified School Facility Needs Most of the improvements completed at our local high schools to date have been funded by school facility improvement bond measures generously approved by our local voters. The District refinanced outstanding bonds to take advantage of historically low interest rates saving taxpayers millions of dollars.
    [Show full text]
  • Flexible Service on Demand East Bay Value Pass Is Valid on County Connection,Tri Delta LOST & FOUND Transit, Westcat and Wheels Fixed-Route Services
    Effective 8/18/17 DAYS & HOURS OF OPERATION Fixed-Route BUS FARES Effective March 22, 2009 (subject to change) FLEXIBLE SERVICE Weekdays - 6:00 AM to 9:00 PM Senior/ Regular 250 ON DEMAND Weekends - (300 series) 9:00 AM to 7:00 PM Disabled CASH Fare Fare* Enjoy shopping, restaurants, Local Holidays - Buses do NOT operate on the following days: $ 2.00 $ 1.00 Weekday and weekend routes fitness, and recreation. New Year’s Day Labor Day Express** Memorial Day Thanksgiving Day $ 2.25 $ 1.00 THURSDAY - SUNDAY SERVICE 90X series routes Independence Day Christmas Day countyconnection.com BART-to-Bus Transfer $ 1.00 $ 0.50 Bus Transfer Free Free For Customer Service call Weekend service (300 series) will be provided on the day County Connection at 925-676-7500 before or after the holiday, when Christmas Day, New Year’s Senior/ Day, or Independence Day falls on a weekend. Regular Disabled CLIPPER Fare Fare* For additional information on holiday service hours, please call Day Pass $ 3.75 $ 1.75 938-RIDE customer service or visit our website - countyconnection.com. 31-Day $ 60 .00 $ NA East Bay Value Pass Late Night Service: Thursday-Sunday *Customer Service phone hours 925-676-7500: 31-Day $ 70.00 $ NA Monday – Friday 6:30 AM – 6:30 PM East Bay Value Pass Express** • Saint Mary’s College students ride FREE Saturday - Sunday Closed when student ID is presented. • General Public - $2.00 Monthly Pass and Punch Cards** • Gael Rail shuttle operates between Lafayette SPECIAL NEEDS East Bay Value Pass - Express Routes $ 70.00 BART station and Saint Mary’s College.
    [Show full text]
  • New Time and New Location
    ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, January 8, 2019 9:30 a.m. Candace Andersen's Office, 3338 Mt. Diablo Blvd. Lafayette, CA 94549 NEW TIME AND NEW LOCATION The committee may take action on each item on the agenda. The action may consist of the recommended action, a related action or no action. Staff recommendations are subject to action and/or change by the committee. 1. Approval of Agenda 2. Public Communication 3. Approval of Minutes of December 4, 2018* 4. CCCTA Investment Policy-Quarterly Reporting Requirement* 5. Income Statements for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2018* 6. Independent Accountant’s report on Federal Transit Administration National Transit Database Reports* (Staff will request that the committee approve the report and forward to the Board.) 7. Proposal for Financial Audit Services* (Staff will ask for direction to accept or reject the proposal from Brown Armstrong.) 8. Route 99X Promotion* (Information Only) 9. Contra Costa Transportation Authority’s Accessible Transportation Strategic (ATS) Plan* (Staff will requests the committee forward this item to the board for discussion, feedback and direction in responding to CCTA’s request for feedback regarding the attached MOU prior to the end of January 2019.) _____________________________________________________________________________________ *Enclosure **Enclosure for Committee Members ***To be mailed under separate cover ****To be available at the meeting. FY2018/2019 A&F Committee Don Tatzin – Lafayette, Al Dessayer-Moraga, Kevin Wilk-Walnut Creek 10. Final Fare Restructure Proposal & Title VI Analysis* (Staff will present the final fare proposal and corresponding Title VI analysis. Staff will request the item be forwarded to Board for approval.) 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Full TCC Agenda Packet
    TCC Agenda December 13, 2017 Transit Coordinating Committee December 13, 2017 – TCC 9:00 a.m. to 11:15 a.m. SACOG Rivers Rooms 1415 L Street, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA Members of the public wishing to address the committee on any item not on the agenda may do so at the beginning of the meeting. We ask that members of the public request to speak and keep their remarks brief. Testimony will be limited to a total of ten (10) minutes. Conference Call Option - Please contact Azadeh Doherty ([email protected]), Barbara VaughanBechtold ([email protected]), Caroline Payne ([email protected]), or the SACOG receptionist (916) 321-9000 for Conference Call information. Please do not put your phone on hold during the conference call; instead please hang up and call back when you’re free. 1) TCC Coordination (Garner/All, 20 minutes) a. Public Comment on non-agenda topics b. Brief introductions and sharing of significant news about transit systems c. Joint Transit Operator Project or Training Opportunities d. General TCC Information DUE December 21st: SB 1 – STA State of Good Repair project listings to SACOG Delivery Plan Project updates: DUE 5 PM, January 5, 2018 for projects using CMAQ or STIP funds Other 2) Review and Approve October 18, 2017 TCC Minutes (All, 5 minutes) 3) Presentation on North State Express Bus Service (Redding to Sacramento) (Jennifer Pollom, Shasta RTA/All, 15 minutes) see attachments April 2016 TIRCP Application – http://srta.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/3444 4) BCAG Chico to Sacramento Commuter Bus Service (Michael Rosson, BCAG/All, 15 minutes) see attachments 5) SB 1 Non-Transit Specific Funding Opportunities (Caceres/All, 20 minutes) a.
    [Show full text]
  • Academic Catalog
    2021 CARRINGTON COLLEGE ACADEMIC CATALOG Volume VI.III February 4, 2021 to December 31, 2021 Updated August 12, 2021 ©2021 Carrington College. All rights reserved. Carrington College Academic Catalog 1 | P age ©2021 Carrington College. All rights reserved. Carrington College updates this catalog at least once annually. Carrington College reserves the right to change the terms and conditions outlined in this catalog at any time without notice. Information is current at the time of printing. This catalog supersedes all previous editions and is in effect until a subsequent catalog is published either in print or online. Updates made after the initial publication on February 4, 2021 are available via carrington.edu/carrington-college /catalog/. It is the responsibility of applicants and students to check for updates. Carrington College is a subsidiary of San Joaquin Valley College, Inc., located at 3828 W. Caldwell Ave., Visalia, CA 93277. San Joaquin Valley College, Inc. is the parent organization of Carrington College and San Joaquin Valley College. Carrington College Academic Catalog 2 | P age LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT Dear Future Graduates: Welcome to Carrington College! We are honored that you have chosen to pursue your education with us and are excited that you are starting on a journey to reach both your personal and professional goals. We encourage you to take advantage of the many academic and professional opportunities that will be presented to you during your time as a student and graduate of Carrington College. Carrington College takes great pride in the instruction and services we deliver to our students on a daily basis.
    [Show full text]