2015-2020

Adopted FY 2015-16 Capital Budget & Five-Year Capital Needs Assessment

City of San Mateo, City Hall, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403 www.cityofsanmateo.org

Adopted FY 2015-16 Capital Budget & 2015-2020 Capital Needs Assessment

City Manager’s Office City Hall 330 W. 20th Avenue San Mateo, California 94403 http://www.cityofsanmateo.org/

1

City • Continue to support redevelopment in major and Council neighborhood commercial areas. • Ensure higher levels of public safety, especially Vision in neighborhoods under the most stress. • Enhance the quality of residential neighborhoods, including particularly improved appearance and more community involvement. • Improve programs for youth, pre-teens, and teens. • Maintain City finances where expenses do not exceed ongoing revenues. • Increase the economic vitality of the City with strengthened ties between business and the general community. • Continue to provide cost-effective and quality services that are accessible to all segments of the San Mateo community. • Provide many different communication vehicles to appeal to all groups and expand community outreach and participation opportunities by all persons who live and or work in San Mateo, including City employees. • Continue current efforts to increase available entry-level housing, striving for a balance between jobs and housing, and encourage City employees to live in San Mateo. • Increase efforts to cooperate with schools and other agencies to improve services, strengthen partnerships, avoid duplication, and decrease costs. • Develop and maintain an organization which values employee participation and a sense of ownership. • Continue efforts to ensure a well-planned, quality-built environment, and to invest in the long-term infrastructure needs of the City promoting a high quality of life and creating an identity for San Mateo that generates civic pride and responsibility.

2

City of San Mateo, California City Council

Mayor ……………………………………...Maureen Freschet Deputy Mayor ………………………………....Jack Matthews Council Members.………………………………...Rick Bonilla Joe Goethals David Lim

City Manager ………………………………....Larry Patterson

3

City of San Mateo Department Directors

City Manager …………………………………… Larry Patterson City Attorney ………………………………………Shawn Mason Assistant City Manager ……………………………Matt Bronson Finance Director ……………………………...... David Culver Director of Public Works ………………………Brad Underwood Director of Parks & Recreation …………………Sheila Canzian Police Chief ……………………………...... Susan Manheimer Fire Chief ……………………………...... John Healy Director of Community Development ……………George White City Librarian ……………………………...... Ben Ocon Information Technology Director …………………….Pete Owen Human Resources Director ………………………Casey Echarte City Clerk ……………………………...... Patrice Olds

4 City of San Mateo Capital Working Group Staff

Assistant City Manager (CIP Coordinator) …………………………………Matt Bronson Deputy Finance Director (CIP Coordinator) ……………..………...Kathleen VonAchen Finance/ Director…………………………………………………...…………..David Culver Public Works/ Director…………………………………………………….Brad Underwood Public Works/ Sr. Engineer - Clean Water Program……….………………Cathi Zammit Public Works/ Sr. Management Analyst………………………………….…Tricia Toomey Public Works/ Business Administrator…………………………………………….Jean Hill Public Works/ Deputy Director WWTP………………………………….…..Gary DeJesus Public Works/ Engineering Manager……………………………………….……Gary Heap Public Works/ Facilities & Fleet Manager ……………………………………...David Fink Public Works/ Field Maintenance Manager…………………………...... Ray Jackson Public Works/ Project Manager II…………………………………….……...Gogo Heinrich Public Works/ Project Manager II……………………………………….…………Ken Chin Public Works/ Sr. Engineer………………………………………………….…….Otis Chan Public Works/ Sr. Engineer………………………………….……………Tracy Scramaglia Parks & Recreation/ Director………………………………………..………Sheila Canzian Parks & Recreation/ Sr. Management Analyst……………………….……...Abby Veeser Parks & Recreation/ Community Services Manager…………………….….Paul Council Parks & Recreation/ Golf Services Manager………………………………….…Tim Heck Parks & Recreation/ Landscape Architect…………………………………..Dennis Frank Parks & Recreation/ Park & Landscape Manager………………………....Mike Blondino Parking Services/ Administrative Technician……………………………………Vivian Ng Fire/ Fire Chief………………………………………………………..…………...John Healy Police / Community Service Officer………………………….…….……...….Betsy Sievert Police / Sergeant……………………………………….……………..…Matthew Earnshaw Finance/ Accounting Manager………………………………………………….Wayne Loo Finance/ Budget Analyst…………………………………………………….…..Lisa Wesley Finance/ Sr. Accountant………………………………………….……..Samantha Cheung Finance/ Payroll Administrator……………………………………………….....Rena Killian Information Technology/ Director……………………………………….……….Pete Owen Information Technology/ GIS Coordinator……………………………….…Patrick Crevelt Information Technology/ Sr. Systems Analyst……………………………….…Peter Roth Community Development/ Neighborhood & Housing Manager.…….…Sandra Council Community Development/ Permit System Coordinator……………….….Phil Kawakami Community Development/ Sr. Management Analyst.………………...…Heather Stewart Library Services/ Sr. Management Analyst………………………………………Jan Busa

5

6 Table of Contents

City Council, Department Directors & Capital Working Group Staff ...... 3 Table of Contents ...... 7 List of Charts & Tables ...... 9

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

City Council Transmittal Letter ...... 11 How to Use This Document ...... 19 Capital Budget Process ...... 21 Location Maps of CIP Projects (General Govtal and Sewer) ...... 24 Location Map of Capital Needs With No Funding Source ...... 26

FINANCIAL OVERVIEW

FY 2015-16 Capital Budget & 2015-2020 Capital Needs Assessment Financial Overview ...... 27 Funding Source Descriptions ...... 39 Overview Charts and Capital Project Summary Tables ...... 45

2015-2020 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT CHARTERS

Streets & Traffic ...... 69 Bridges ...... 83 Street Lights & Utility Undergrounding ...... 91 Storm Drainage & Flood Control ...... 95 Clean Water Program (Sewer) ...... 99 Sewer – Collection System ...... 103 Sewer – Wastewater Treatment Plant ...... 123 Parking Facilities ...... 145 Parks & Recreation ...... 153 Bikeways & Pedestrian Paths ...... 167

7 Affordable Housing ...... 175 City Facilities & Buildings ...... 179 Information Technology ...... 187 Miscellaneous City Projects ...... 197

CAPITAL NEEDS WITH NO FUNDING SOURCE PROJECT CHARTERS

Streets & Traffic ...... 207 Street Lights & Utility Undergrounding ...... 215 Storm Drainage & Flood Control ...... 219 Parks & Recreation ...... 227 Bikeways & Pedestrian Paths ...... 239 City Facilities & Buildings ...... 263 Information Technology ...... 287 Miscellaneous City Projects ...... 291

APPENDICES

City Debt Limits & Obligations ...... 297 Index of Capital Projects ...... 301

8 List of Charts and Tables

Table/Chart # Pg # Table / Chart Description

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Bar Chart 1-1 11 Components of Capital Needs Assessment Pie Chart 1-2 12 FY 2015-16 Proposed Capital Budget Bar Chart 1-3 13 Citywide CIP (2015-2020), Costs of Planned Projects Bar Chart 1-4 14 Citywide CIP (2015-2020), Funding Sources of Planned Projects Bar Chart 1-5 15 CIP by Function/Goal 2015-2020 Bar Chart 1-6 16 Capital Project Needs With No Funding Source 2015-2020 Table 1-1 18 High-Priority Ranked Projects With No Funding Source Table 1-2 20 Sample Capital Funding Plan/ Projection Table Chart 1-7 22 CIP Budget Process Calendar

FINANCIAL OVERVIEW

Table 2-1 27 City Manager’s Proposed CIP Summary Table 2-2 27 General Govt CIP Costs by Service Delivery Category Table 2-3 28 General Govt CIP by Funding Source Category Table 2-4 28 General Fund Supported CIP Projects Table 2-5 29 Sewer Enterprise Five-Year CIP Costs Bar Chart 2-1 29 San Mateo Clean Water Program, 20-Yr Plan Table 2-6 30 Sewer Enterprise CIP by Funding Source Table 2-7 31 Streets-Traffic CIP Project Costs & Funding Sources Table 2-8 32 Storm Drainage/Flood Control CIP Costs & Funding Sources Table 2-9 32 Bridges CIP Project Costs & Funding Sources Table 2-10 33 Parking CIP Project Costs & Funding Sources Table 2-11 34 Parks & Recreation CIP Project Costs & Funding Sources Table 2-12 34 Other Service Delivery Categories CIP Costs & Funding Sources Table 2-13 35 Capital Project Without a Funding Source by Service Delivery Table 2-14 36 Streets &Traffic Capital Projects Without a Funding Source Table 2-15 36 Storm Drainage/Flood Control Projects Without a Funding Source Table 2-16 37 Parks and Recreation Capital Projects Without a Funding Source Table 2-17 37 Bikeways & Pedestrian Paths Projects Without a Funding Source Table 2-18 38 City Facilities & Bldgs Capital Projects Without a Funding Source Table 2-19 39 General Fund Transfers for CIP Projects Table 2-20 40 Gas Tax funded CIP Projects Table 2-21 40 Measure A Half-Cent Sales Tax funded CIP Projects Table 2-22 42 Traffic Impact Fee funded CIP Projects Table 2-23 42 Park in lieu Fee funded CIP Projects Pie Chart 2-2 46 Citywide FY 2015-16 Capital Budget by Service Delivery Category Pie Chart 2-3 47 Citywide FY 2015-16 Capital Budget by Funding Source Category Pie Chart 2-4 48 Gen Govt FY 2015-16 by Service Delivery Category, 5-Yr Totals Pie Chart 2-5 49 Gen Govt FY 2015-16 by Funding Source Category, 5-Yr Totals Pie Chart 2-6 50 Sewer FY 2015-16 by Service Delivery Category, 5-Yr Totals Pie Chart 2-7 51 Sewer FY 2015-16 by Funding Source Category, 5-Yr Totals Pie Chart 2-8 52 CIP Costs by Service Delivery Category, 5-Yr Totals

9 Table/Chart # Pg # Table / Chart Description

Pie Chart 2-9 53 CIP by Funding Source Category, 5-Yr Totals Pie Chart 2-10 54 Gen Govt CIP by Service Delivery Category, 5-Yr Totals Pie Chart 2-11 55 Gen Govt CIP by Funding Source Category, 5-Yr Totals Pie Chart 2-12 56 Sewer CIP by Service Delivery Category, 5-Yr Totals Pie Chart 2-13 57 Sewer CIP by Funding Source Category, 5-Yr Totals Table 2-24 58 List of CIP Capital Project Costs by Service Delivery 2015-2020 Table 2-25 60 List of CIP Capital Projects by Funding Source Detail 2015-2020 Pie Chart 2-14 64 Capital Projects With No Funding by Service Delivery, 5-Yr Totals Table 2-26 65 List of Capital Projects With No Funding Sources 2015-2020

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) - PROJECT CHARTERS

Table 3-1 69 Streets & Traffic CIP Project Costs & Funding Source Table 3-2 83 Bridges CIP Project Costs & Funding Source Table 3-3 91 Streets Lights CIP Project Costs & Funding Source Table 3-4 95 Storm Drain-Flood Control CIP Project Costs & Funding Source Table 3-5 99 Sewer Enterprise Five-Year CIP by Service Delivery Category Bar Chart 3-1 100 San Mateo Clean Water Program, 20-Yr Plan Table 3-6 100 WWTP CIP Project Costs Table 3-7 101 Sewer Collection System CIP Project Costs Table 3-8 101 Sewer Enterprise CIP by Funding Source Table 3-9 145 Parking Facilities CIP Project Costs & Funding Source Table 3-10 154 Parks & Recreation CIP Project Costs & Funding Source Table 3-11 167 Bikeways & Pedestrian Paths CIP Project Costs & Funding Source Table 3-12 175 Affordable Housing CIP Project Costs & Funding Source Table 3-13 179 City Facilities & Buildings CIP Project Costs & Funding Source Table 3-14 187 Information Technology CIP Project Costs & Funding Source Table 3-15 197 City Miscellaneous CIP Project Costs & Funding Source

CAPITAL NEEDS WITH NO FUNDING SOURCE – PROJECT CHARTERS

Table 4-1 207 Streets & Traffic Projects Without Funding Source 2015-2020 Table 4-2 215 Streets Lights/Utility Projects Without Funding Source 2015-2020 Table 4-3 219 Storm Drainage-Flood Control Without Funding Source 2015-2020 Table 4-4 228 Parks & Recreation Projects Without Funding Source 2015-2020 Bar Chart 4-1 239 Pedestrian Injuries and Fatality Incidents (2005 – 2014) Bar Chart 4-2 240 Bicycle Injuries and Fatality Incidents (2005 – 2014) Table 4-5 240 Bikeways & Pedestrian Paths Without Funding Source 2015-2020 Table 4-6 263 City Facilities & Bldgs Projects Without Funding Source 2015-2020 Table 4-7 287 Information Technology Without Funding Source 2015-2020 Table 4-8 291 Misc. Capital Projects Without Funding Source 2015-2020

APPENDICES

Table 5-1 298 City Outstanding Bonded Indebtedness as of 6/30/2015 Table 5-2 301 Index of Capital Projects

10 Executive Summary

City Council Transmittal Letter

June 16, 2015

Honorable Mayor and Council Members:

I am pleased to present the Adopted FY 2015-16 Capital Budget and Capital Needs Assessment for the City of San Mateo. This document will guide the City in the planning and scheduling of infrastructure improvement projects over the next five year. This year City staff redesigned the capital planning process to include a comprehensive assessment of all the City’s capital needs regardless of identified funding resources. As a result, this document has two components: 1) FY 2015-16 Capital Budget and 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) in which all project costs have identified funding sources, and 2) capital projects without an available funding source provided to guide future policy discussions. Table 1-1: Components of Capital Needs Assessment A total of $1.032 Billion in capital facilities and infrastructure improvements have been identified through this year’s new capital assessment process. The capital projects span across all twelve of the City’s service delivery categories, including streets, bridges, sewer, storm drainage and flood control, and parks and recreation. Of the $1.032 Billion total, $672 million (CIP) have identified revenue or funding sources and $360 million lack a funding source.

The $672 million of capital projects with identified funding sources constitute the City’s proposed Five-Year CIP, of which $84 million is for the first year of the CIP or the FY 2015- 16 Capital Budget authorized for appropriations by the City Council. The later four years of the Five-Year CIP contains planned projects with identified funding sources of $348 million and $240 million in which capital funding is depend upon successfully competing in grant award processes and not guaranteed. Finally of the $1.032 billion comprising the City’s capital needs assessment, $360 million have been identified to have no funding source and are beyond the City’s financial resources. Specific information for all the $1.032 billion is provided in this document by referring to each project’s capital project charter.

11 The Council adopted the 2015-2020 CIP totaling $672 million. Adoption of the Five-Year CIP constitutes acceptance, in concept, of the prioritized list and the timing of the projects with identified funding sources. The CIP will be reviewed and updated as part of the adoption of each Two-Year Business Plan. Projects can be added, deleted or have their timing revised at that time based on updated funding and other factors.

The City’s entire CIP is budgeted and expensed within the General Capital Projects Fund (Fund 59), with all capital related funding sources or revenues recorded directly in the fund or resources from other City funds transferred to Fund 59. Each capital project is separately accounted for with a project # within Fund 59. In order to provide an overview of the capital program, these projects are categorized by service delivery, such as streets, storm drainage or parks. Due to the enterprise funds’ private sector accounting principles, all financial transactions of the sewer and golf enterprises are reclassified at the end of the fiscal year from Fund 59 to their respective enterprise funds.

Adopted FY 2015-16 Capital Budget The proposed 2015-16 Capital Budget, which includes general government and enterprise capital needs, is $84 million, an increase of 68% over the amended FY 2014-15 Capital Budget of $50 million. This increase is due to additional sewer collection system and wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) capital projects as part of the Clean Water Program.

The projects included in the FY 2015-16 Capital Budget are generally part of on-going capital projects, master plans and long term capital programs. In addition, the following projects were approved to be added for FY 2015-16, all four of which are funded by the General Fund: • $150,000 for drought resistant/tolerant landscaping at City Hall, • $180,000 for the new CiRM System Implementation to improve the management and responsiveness to citizen requests for information and services, • $45,250 to complete the Ryder Park flood control levee repairs, and • $200,000 for replacement of the Parks & Recreation Department’s business software.

Of the $84 million total, $68 million or 81% are for 24 Chart 1-2: sewer projects to be funded by sewer revenue bond financing, State Water Resources Control Board revolving loans, and capital contributions from the City of Foster City and the enterprises’ sub-regional agency partners. The remaining $15.7 million or 19% of the total capital budget next fiscal year are for the general government service delivery categories, such as streets, traffic, storm, bridges and bikeways and pedestrian paths. These 41 proposed projects are funded by a $5.5 million transfer from the General Fund, $5.1 million in dedicated capital tax revenues such as Gas Tax and the countywide Measure A half- cent sales tax, $1.835 million in traffic impact fees, $660,000 in park in lieu fees, and the remaining from various grants, contributions from private parties and government agencies.

The list of 66 capital projects proposed for FY 2015-16 is provided in the Financial Summary section of this report. The Capital Budget is incorporated into the annual operating budget process and is approved as part of the Council’s regular budget meetings in June.

12 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) The 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Program was developed as part of a multi-year capital planning process, and includes the FY 2015-16 Capital Budget and the City’s plan for the future four years of capital projects. The Five-Year CIP totals $672 million, of which $331.4 million are general government projects (all projects except sewer) and $340.6 million are Clean Water Program sewer projects. Of the 82 total projects, 48 projects are for general government capital needs and 34 projects are for the sewer enterprise.

The chart below illustrates five-year project costs by service delivery category. A significant level of the CIP is for sewer, especially in the beginning years. During FY 2015-16 and FY 2016-17 the sewer capital plan includes three significant projects: WWTP secondary treatment capacity with estimated cost of $19.7 million, WWTP headworks and primary clarifier replacement estimated at $106 million, and upgrade of the South Trunk collection system at $53 million.

Chart 1-3:

In FY 2017-18, capital spending peaks due to $200 million for the 25th Avenue grade separation bridge to eliminate the at-grade rail crossing, planned to be funded by $188 million from other agencies and $12 million in traffic impact fees. The last two years are primarily sewer projects.

13 Chart 1-4:

The chart above illustrates the myriad of funding sources for the CIP. The largest funding source is bonds and loans of $294 million, $278 million of which will finance Clean Water Program sewer projects. The remaining $16 million is identified for a new downtown parking garage. The second largest funding source is $154 million in planned subventions from other regional agencies, much of which is planned for the rail corridor grade separation project. As previously mentioned, $240 million of general government capital funding are depend upon successfully competing in various grant and other governmental agency funding award processes. The grant funds for this project have not been approved. This is not uncommon for projects scheduled later in the Five-Year CIP. Having the projects identified in the CIP can be advantageous during the grant application process. Funding that is pending confirmation is $188 million for the rail corridor grade separation project, $36.0 million for the Hillsdale Station relocation plan, and $16.1 million for the El Camino Real and Highway 92 interchange project, all of which is planned for FY 2016-17 and FY 2017-18. City staff will be pursuing efforts to secure this funding during next fiscal year.

The list of capital projects planned for the 2015-2020 CIP is provided in the Financial Overview section of this report.

The CIP can also be categorized based on how the projects relate to the Council’s stated goals. Chart 1-5 below illustrates the recommended capital projects by Council goal. Of the Five-Year CIP $672 million total, 56% are categorized as Necessary to Maintain Quality of Life, followed by 37% Necessary for Health and Safety. Capital projects for Major Services & Equipment Replacement amount to 5% and Improve Quality of Life 1% of total projects.

14 Chart 1-5:

Capital Projects With No Funding Source The City of San Mateo has been incorporated for over 120 years and has worked diligently to provide excellent, quality of life services that are priorities for our public, including properly maintained streets, sidewalks, parks and playgrounds, senior and recreation centers, flood control facilities, and more. However, the City’s infrastructure is aging -- some of its infrastructure is over 100 years old -- and it must be properly maintained and repaired before it becomes more expensive to do so, in the future. The Capital Needs Assessment conducted this year and the extent of infrastructure needs identified leads to the importance of enhancing the level of investment in community infrastructure and increasing funding for maintenance and repair to ensure our infrastructure has a long life serving our community.

This needs assessment also builds on a recent community survey conducted by the City and the many master plans the City has developed in recent years including the Sustainable Streets Plan, Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plans, and Bay Meadows and Master Plans. Additional capital investments are needed to implement these master plans and help improve overall quality of life in San Mateo, which our constituents want. In fact, an independently conducted survey in April indicated that maintaining and enhancing parks, paths and playfields; providing safe playground equipment at all City parks; and fixing cracks, potholes and miles of failed streets are all top priorities for our constituents.

Over the past year, City staff has conducted this needs assessment and developed a list of capital needs regardless of the funding availability. This process resulted in 70 capital projects with unidentified funding totaling $360 million that represent important infrastructure and facilities needs waiting to be addressed by the City. These unfunded projects are beyond the capacity of the City’s existing funding sources and will ultimately require additional funding to implement.

The list of capital projects with no funding source is provided in the Financial Overview section.

15 Chart 1-6:

The chart above illustrates the total projects lacking a funding source, presented by service delivery category. The most costly capital project is in the bikeway and pedestrian pathways category, a citywide pedestrian-scale lighting project designated by the Pedestrian Master Plan with a total estimated cost of $115 million, or $23 million annually for five years. The second largest unfunded capital need service delivery category is parks and recreation with a total of $75 million or 21%. The two largest high-priority parks projects without identified funding sources are Central Park beginning in FY 2017-18 estimated to cost $31 million and Bay Meadows Community Park in FY 2019-20 estimated to cost $35 million. Master planning efforts for both these parks projects is ongoing. In addition to these two areas, below is a summary of three high-priority infrastructure needs lacking identified funding sources.

Failed Streets The City of San Mateo owns and maintains approximately 192 miles of streets. The 2012 replacement value of this asset is approximately $350 million dollars. The primary measure of effectiveness used in the Street Maintenance Pavement Management Program is the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) although the number of miles of failed streets is also important to the City Council. Over the past few years the City Council has allocated $2.5 million in FY 2012-13 and $2.0 million in annual transfers from the General Fund for reconstruction of failed streets through FY 2016-17. These funds are in addition to the normal annual paving program allocation, which focuses on preventative maintenance.

In 2013, an estimate of costs to repair 19 miles of failed or failing streets totaled $34 million. The number of miles of failed streets cannot be reduced unless the funding for preventative maintenance is maintained and additional funding is provided for reconstruction of those streets that have or will be failing. At the February 2014 Council Planning Meeting, the Council first identified the elimination of failed streets as a priority item.

16 Flood Control Improvements On October 16, 2012, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) issued a Physical Map Revision (PMR) which removed approximately 8,000 homes in neighborhoods south of San Mateo Creek from the Special Flood Hazard Area. Unfortunately, approximately 1200 properties, located in the areas north of San Mateo Creek, including the North Shoreview and a portion of the North Central neighborhoods, remain in the flood zone. Project costs to protect these properties include $7.5 million for the North Bayfront levee improvement project and $16.0 million for the Popular Avenue & Coyote Point pump stations.

Funding for stormwater and flood control system operation and maintenance is very limited while the capital repair and replacement needs have been estimated to be approximately $85 million. San Mateo’s storm drainage system is separate and distinct from the sewer system (although both are impacted during wet weather). Because the systems are separate, sewer revenues may not be used to fund storm and flood control infrastructure improvements. In addition, imposition of a fee for storm drainage/flood control purposes is prohibited by Proposition 218 without a majority vote of property owners. As a result, there is currently no funding source for storm drainage and flood control infrastructure other than general government tax (General Fund) dollars. Without a dedicated funding source, the City’s flood control and storm drainage infrastructure will continue to deteriorate.

Park and Recreation Deferred Capital Needs Parks and recreation capital needs heavily rely upon Parks in Lieu Fees as a funding source. As a result, needed projects with price tags beyond the capacity of this revenue source were deferred. A total of $75 million for nine parks and recreation capital improvement projects have been identified as needed, yet have no available funding. As mentioned, construction of Central Park and Bay Meadows Community Park are two high-priority projects with estimated funding of $31 million and $35 million, respectively.

The next largest projects without a funding source are Laurelwood/Sugarloaf open space costing $3.6 million and the Park Play Areas at $3.8 million. In addition to these projects, the department has many priority projects without a funding source included in the City Facilities & Buildings service delivery category because responsibility for the management of these assets is assigned to the Public Works, Facilities Division. These high priority deferred maintenance projects include resurfacing of Central Park and Beresford Park tennis courts, the refurbishments of park restrooms and the renovation of parking lots at places like Beresford and Shoreview centers.

Efforts towards Additional Resources The Council has consistently identified both the elimination of failed streets and the North Shoreview storm water/flood control improvements as key priorities at its 2015 Planning Meeting. As a result, Council directed staff to investigate new funding sources for these and other capital improvements. The results of a recent survey to gauge public support of a revenue measure will be presented to the Council at the May 18th meeting. The revenue measure would not fund infrastructure exclusively. It is anticipated that the measure would also fund public safety and other general city services.

17 In addition to projects related to failed streets and flood control improvements, there are a number of other high-priority unfunded capital improvement projects. These projects are:

Table 1-1: "HIGH PRIORITY" RANKED PROJECTS 5-YR TOTAL WITH NO FUNDING SOURCE COSTS ADA Facility Improvements, City-wide 830,000 ADA Transition Plan 75,000 Bay Meadows Community Park 35,000,000 Beresford Recreation Center Parking Lot Repair 150,000 Beresford Tennis Courts Re-surface 100,000 Central Park 31,000,000 Central Park Tennis Courts Re-surface 1,125,000 Citywide - Park Play Area Upgrades 3,800,000 Citywide Street Lights 910,000 Document Management System 500,000 Downtown Sidewalk Repair Program 2,750,000 Fire Station 27 Earthquake Evaluation 20,000 Fire Station 27 Earthquake Upgrades 500,000 Laurelwood/Sugarloaf Open Space 3,645,000 Los Prados Park Building Refurbish 75,000 New Building Component Replacement 2,950,000 Norfolk Street Road Diet 240,000 North B Improvement Project 200,000 North Bayfront Levee Improvements Project 7,500,000 Parkside Aquatics Interior Restrooms Refurbish 75,000 Poplar Ave & Coyote Point Pump Stations Rehab 16,000,000 Recycled Water Distribution System 30,000,000 Sustainable Streets Plan 75,000 Wheelchair Ramp Installation in Downtown 860,000 TOTAL "HIGH-PRIORITY" UNFUNDED PROJECTS $ 138,380,000

Future Steps for Capital Improvement Process The adopted FY 2015-16 Capital Budget and Five-Year CIP was included as part of the budget presentation to Council in June 2015. This adopted FY 2015-16 Capital Budget focuses on immediate capital needs and capital projects that allow for progress on various initiatives and master plans. The Five-Year CIP will be reviewed and updated as part of the adoption of each Two-Year Business Plan.

I would like to thank our dedicated City Council for its leadership and our Executive Team and the entire staff for providing outstanding services to our community. Special thanks to Assistant City Manager Matt Bronson, Deputy Finance Director Kathleen VonAchen, Public Works Director Brad Underwood, Parks and Recreation Director Sheila Canzian, Finance Director David Culver and their respective teams, as well as all of whom have worked countless hours during evenings and on weekends to put this capital plan together as well as staff across all departments who contributed their capital programming expertise.

Respectfully submitted,

Larry Patterson City Manager

18 How to Use This Document

The City of San Mateo’s Adopted FY 2015-16 Capital Budget and 2015-2020 Capital Needs Assessment contains information on how the City plans to invest available resources for key infrastructure and facilities between July 1, 2015 and June 30, 2020.

Document Organization The FY 2015-16 Capital Budget and 2015-2020 Capital Needs Assessment has five main parts: • Executive Summary • Financial Overview • 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Program Project Charters • Capital Needs With No Funding Source Project Charters • Appendices

Executive Summary: The Executive Summary section provides an overview of the FY 2015-16 Capital Budget, the 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Program, and capital needs with no funding source, all of which comprises the 2015-2020 Capital Needs Assessment. This section also describes the capital program development process and provides maps identifying the locations of projects.

Financial Overview: The Financial Overview section contains analysis and graphical presentations of how the 2015-2020 CIP allocated dollars among city service delivery categories and funding sources, and overviews of the capital needs lacking funding sources. Full financial details can be found in the tables of this section. This section also provides descriptions of the legal authority and nature of the capital program funding sources.

2015-2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project Charters: Included in this section is the CIP that includes planned capital projects and identified funding sources. This section is organized by service delivery category. Following an overview for each service delivery category (i.e., streets, bridges, etc.) are the categories’ respective capital project charters that provide more detail of individual capital project justifications.

Capital Needs with No Funding Sources Project Charters: This section includes capital projects in which no funding source has been identified (unfunded). This section is organized by service delivery category. Following an overview for each service delivery category (i.e., streets, street lights, etc.) are the categories’ respective capital project charters that provide more detail of the capital projects’ need and benefits.

Appendices: Two appendices are included. The first describes the City’s debt program, debt limitations, and current outstanding debt obligations. The second appendix is an index of all the capital projects.

How to Read Capital Project Financial Data The Capital Funding Plan/ Projection Table of each project’s charter contain three sections: • Project Summary • Project Cost Cashflow • Funding Sources (CIP Recommendation or unidentified source)

19 Table 1-2 shows an example of the table. The Project Summary section shows the total estimated cost of completing the project, which includes an estimate of unspent prior year capital appropriations and additional project funding proposed. The additional CIP request line reflects projected needs for the future five years. For most projects in the CIP, the Capital Funding Plan/Projection Table shows total allocated dollars to the project prior to FY 2015-16 and for each year between FY 2015-16 through FY 2019-20.

Ongoing programs generally allocate a set amount of funding per year on a continuing basis. On-going programs tables, because they have typically received funding for many years prior to FY 2015-16, reflect prior year appropriations at the top, the amount of those funds that have been spent and/or are encumbered, the amount of existing appropriations remaining to be spent, and proposed capital needs for the future five years.

Table 1-2: Sample Capital Funding Plan/ Projection Table

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 500,000 Expended & Encumbered (358,596) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 141,404 Additional CIP Request 6,950,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 7,091,404

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 1,050,000 700,000 350,000 Construction 5,900,000 350,000 5,550,000 Other - Annual Cashlow Totals 6,950,000 700,000 350,000 350,000 5,550,000 -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendations 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) - Crystal S/SM Cty/Hillsborough 486,500 98,000 388,500 Sew er Bonds 1,302,000 1,302,000 SWRCB Revolving Loan 5,161,500 5,161,500 CIP Funding Totals 6,950,000 1,400,000 - - 5,550,000 -

The second section is the Project Cost Cashflow reflects the expectation of when the additional 5-year capital request will be expensed by category of preliminary engineering, construction and other. The third section reflects the identified funding sources, amounts and timing of the City Council action to appropriate the capital project funds to proceed with procurement process for award of bid and encumbrance. In Table 1-2, $1.4 million is requested to be appropriated by the City Council for preliminary engineering in FY 2015-16 of which is estimated to be expensed over three years, followed by the Council appropriation in FY 2018-19 for the construction budget expected to be spent in the same fiscal year.

In order to simplify a project’s presentation, spending plans (cashflow) for estimated remaining and unspent prior capital budget appropriations are left in the Project Summary section of the Capital Funding Plan / Projection Table. These prior year appropriations and remaining unspent balances are provided for informational purposes as to the status of the capital project. These unspent balances not require further Council action. Capital projects with remaining prior year budget balances expected to be available in the future yet without additional funding requested during the future five years have been included in this document in order to provide the reader with more information on the City’s existing efforts to address infrastructure needs. Once prior appropriations have been spent, these capital projects will drop off future documents.

Capital project charters without an identified funding source are included in the Projects with No Funding Sources section towards the later portion of the document. Details of these unfunded projects have been provided to information of the City’s identified capital infrastructure needs.

20 Capital Budget Process

City staff members across all departments worked since September 2014 to improve the usefulness of the CIP process. In the past departments compiled lists of priority projects based on the availability of funding sources for submission to the Council as part of the city’s Two-Year Business Plan process. The re-designed CIP development process has been a collaborative staff effort involving a needs assessment of infrastructure needs and development of project charters for all capital needs, regardless of identified funding sources.

Advantages of Capital Planning A Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a multi-year planning instrument used by governments to identify needed capital projects and to coordinate financing and timing of improvements in a manner that maximizes the return to the public. A large financial investment is required to maintain and expand public facilities and infrastructure. Failure to maintain capital stock results in deteriorating facilities and infrastructure that require constant maintenance, threatens services, and potentially stagnate community growth and vitality.

Governments need a capital planning process for:  An orderly comprehensive replacement of capital facilities and equipment;  Ensure operational continuity;  Assist with long-range fiscal planning;  Facilitate adequate capital project planning and timing;  Enhance a bond rating; and  Provide a public communication tool.

Although capital planning requires significant staff time for its development, implementation, and maintenance, its advantages include:  A capital program focuses attention on community goals, needs, and financial capability;  A capital plan builds public consensus for projects and improves community awareness;  A capital program improves intergovernmental cooperation and communication;  A capital plan avoids waste of resources; and  A capital program helps to ensure financial stability;

Capital Asset and Capital Project Definition A capital asset is defined as a new or rehabilitated physical asset that is nonrecurring, has a useful life of five or more years and is expensive to purchase. A capital project is construction of a capital asset. The capital projects in this report generally are over $50,000 in total costs ($25,000 for information technology projects) with a useful life of generally 15 years (3-5 years for IT or maintenance projects). Some exceptions are allowed based on the nature of the need.

Capital Program Development Steps The City has been guided by the traditional ten steps for developing a comprehensive capital improvement program, which include: 1) Establishing an administrative structure; 2) Establishing capital planning financial policies; 3) Establishing evaluation criteria; 4) Conducting a capital needs assessment; 5) Identifying projects for the capital program;

21 6) Analyzing financial capacity; 7) Evaluating funding options; 8) Prioritizing projects; 9) Accepting the capital program; and 10) Monitoring the capital program.

The City’s administrative structure (Step 1) was formed with the creation of a capital working group composed of departments with infrastructure projects. This group was led by the City Manager’s Office to provide policy guidance and assisted by the Finance Department to assist in coordinating the process. Existing capital asset and financial policies generally fulfill Step 2, although updates to capital policies are planned in the future, including the asset management policies. Establishing prioritization criteria (Step 3) generally involved determining a project’s alignment with Council priorities and goals, maintenance of existing assets, and other factors.

Steps 4 and 5 concern conducting a capital needs assessment and identifying projects, which was the focus of City staff effort over the past year and are provided in the capital project charters for all capital projects in this document. Steps 6 through 8 takes place in March and April and includes analyzing the financial capacity of the city to support the capital program and evaluating funding options. Step 9, acceptance of the capital program takes place in June, with adoption of the first year of the CIP as part of the city’s budget process. Step 10 takes place throughout future fiscal year including progress updates to Council.

Throughout this process, collaboration with the capital working group took place through periodic update meetings. Chart 1-7 shows the timing of the capital program development steps.

Chart 1-7: CIP Budget Process Calendar Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Aug

Ci ty Council CIP Information Reviews Sharing Meeting Dra ft CIP Departments Submit Project Charters

Ci ty Counci l Adopts Capital Budget Department Project Department Prioritization Submit Guidelines Project Prioritization CIP Published

Departments meet with CMO & Finance

Boards, Commissions, and Council Priorities

CIP Planning

Capital Needs Assessment The capital needs assessment focuses on both the government’s current and future assets by review of inventories or listings of major capital facilities and equipment and collecting specific information about each asset. The specific information useful in doing the assessment included age, condition, maintenance history and replacement costs of the asset. This information is then used to plan for capital renewal, replacement, expansion, or retirement of facilities.

22 Identifying future capital asset needs required a review of forecasting demographic information, such as land use patterns and transportation plans.

A checklist for developing the capital needs assessment included: • Clearly defining and categorizing each capital asset • Identifying the location of the capital asset • Accounting for the number of each asset the City owns • Determining how old each asset is and its purchase date • Assessing its condition (excellent, good, fair, poor) • Identifying what repairs have been made, when were the repairs made, and the cost of the repairs • Identifying the initial purchase price of the asset and its current replacement value

An important part of the capital programming process is to collect the capital requests from the City departments once they have conducted an assessment of their needs. Identifying capital projects not only includes new projects but also providing a status update on previously approved projects. Efforts in collecting this data are a continual process, are still ongoing and will be the focus of the City in future years.

Reviewing existing projects informs the city’s management as to whether the project is on schedule and within budget in order to determine whether additional funds are needed to complete the project, whether subsequent phases of the project should be budgeted, and the amount of funds that may be available for reprogramming from completed or discontinued projects. In identifying new capital projects, some basic information is required to be submitted for the city management’s review. This information generally includes project scope, justification based on CIP policies and goals, and expenditure schedules, and this information is provided through the capital project charters.

Results of Capital Needs Assessment The result of City staff efforts to follow these general guidelines is found in this document. The FY 2015-16 Capital Budget and 2015-2020 Capital Needs Assessment provides comprehensive and detailed information of the City’s infrastructure needs, including capital project charters for each identified capital need. The development of this needs assessment relied upon the City’s many Council approved master plans developed to address the vision in a broad range service delivery areas.

23 ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ Ó ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿Æ￿￿￿￿￿￿Ó ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ 24 ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ® ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿^^^ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿^^^^^ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿^^ ￿￿ ￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿^^

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ 25 ® ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿

￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ 26 ® ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ ￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿￿ Financial Overview

FY 2015-16 Capital Budget & 2015-2020 Capital Needs Assessment

The City of San Mateo’s Capital Needs Assessment totals $1.032 billion and is comprised of the 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) totaling $672 million and $360 million in capital needs with no identified funding sources. The first year of the Five-Year CIP totals $84 million, and is the FY 2015-16 Capital Budget authorized for appropriation by Council. A summary of the FY 2015-16 Capital Budget is in the City Council Transmittal Letter.

Of the total $672 million Five-Year CIP, $331.4 million are general government projects (all projects except sewer) and $340.6 million are San Mateo Clean Water Program in infrastructure improvements to the sewer collection system and wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). Of the 82 total projects, 48 projects are for general government, in most service delivery categories, and 34 projects are sewer enterprise collection system and WWTP.

Table 2-1: City Manager’s Proposed CIP Summary Proposed 5-Yr CIP Summary 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 General Govt Capital Projects - 48 projects 331,397,309 15,761,309 42,569,500 256,270,500 9,413,000 7,383,000 Clean Water Program (Sewer) - 34 projects 340,591,429 68,144,800 163,632,060 15,702,806 68,919,518 24,192,245 Proposed 5-Year CIP Total - 82 projects 671,988,738 83,906,109 206,201,560 271,973,306 78,332,518 31,575,245

Various tables listing each project by service delivery category and funding source detail are provided in this Financial Overview section following the pie charts. Specific information on each CIP project is provided in the project charter sections of this report.

General Government Capital Projects

Due to the size of the City’s Clean Water Program (sewer), the CIP is separated out by general government capital needs and sewer infrastructure needs. Table 2-2 summarizes the Five-Year CIP for general government capital project costs by service delivery category.

Table 2-2: General Government CIP Costs by Service Delivery Category (excludes Sewer) General Govermental 5-Yr CIP Summary 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Affordable Housing 1,866,500 90,000 1,551,500 75,000 75,000 75,000 Bikeways & Pedestrian Paths 5,675,000 1,235,000 1,110,000 1,110,000 1,110,000 1,110,000 Bridges 261,350,000 1,250,000 29,650,000 230,150,000 150,000 150,000 Facilities & Buildings 2,200,000 560,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 Information Technology 755,000 455,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Miscellaneous Projects 880,566 240,566 160,000 150,000 180,000 150,000 Parking 16,000,000 - - 16,000,000 - - Parks & Recreation 7,730,000 780,000 2,160,000 2,730,000 2,030,000 30,000 Storm Drainage & Flood Control 2,770,250 590,250 545,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 Street Lights & Utility Undergrounding 446,615 446,615 Streets & Traffic 31,723,378 10,113,878 6,908,000 5,025,500 4,838,000 4,838,000 General Govtal 5-Year CIP Total 331,397,309 15,761,309 42,569,500 256,270,500 9,413,000 7,383,000

27

Of the $331.4 million general government CIP, $200 million is for one project – the 25th Avenue grade separation, a bridge along the CalTrain corridor that will eliminate the at-grade rail crossing. That project’s funding plan includes $188 million from other agency sources and $12 million in traffic impact fees. Projects adopted by Council for appropriation in FY 2015-16 total $15.76 million, with $10.1 million for street and for traffic improvements.

Table 2-3 details the funding sources of the general government capital projects. The largest funding sources planned include $127.6 million in state grants, followed by $98.57 million in other agencies’ funds, $24.9 million in federal grants and $22 million in developer contributions. Expected funding from federal and state grants are estimates and are not guaranteed until the City successful participates in competitive grant application processes. The General Fund contributes $20.45 million, or 6%, over the five year period, and dedicated taxes such as Gas Tax and Measure A half-cent sales tax total $17.3 million or 5%.

Table 2-3: General Government CIP by Funding Source Category (excludes Sewer) General Govt Funding Source Category 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Bonds and Loans 16,248,790 248,790 - 16,000,000 - - Developer Contributions 22,050,566 2,650,566 2,300,000 14,700,000 2,200,000 200,000 Federal Grants 24,969,450 415,000 23,879,450 225,000 225,000 225,000 Fees & Charges 3,300,000 650,000 650,000 790,000 620,000 590,000 General Fund 20,450,250 5,510,250 6,135,000 2,935,000 2,935,000 2,935,000 Other Agencies 98,573,878 456,878 108,000 98,003,000 3,000 3,000 Private Contributions 877,825 277,825 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 State Grants 127,624,550 500,000 6,272,050 120,392,500 205,000 255,000 Gas Tax / Measure A 17,302,000 5,052,000 3,075,000 3,075,000 3,075,000 3,025,000 General Govt 5-Year CIP Total 331,397,309 15,761,309 42,569,500 256,270,500 9,413,000 7,383,000

Total General Fund transfers to the City’s Capital Projects Fund (Fund 59) equal to $20.45 million over the five years. Table 2-4 lists projects receiving General Fund support.

Table 2-4: General Fund Supported CIP Projects General Fund Transfers - CIP Projects 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Bay Meadows Affordable Housing Site 1,200,000 1,200,000 CiRM System Implementation 180,000 180,000 - - - - City Hall Landscaping-Water Conservation 150,000 150,000 - - - - Citywide Bike/Ped Path Improvements 50,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Citywide Sidewalk Repair Program 2,500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 Citywide Street Reconstruction 4,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 - - - Citywide Street Rehabilitation 10,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 New Building Component Replacement (Status Quo) 2,050,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 Parks and Recreation Business Software 200,000 200,000 - - - - Ryder Park Levee Repair 45,250 45,250 Park Citywide Plygnd Eqp Replace/PW 75,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 General Fund Transfers 5-Year CIP Total 20,450,250 5,510,250 6,135,000 2,935,000 2,935,000 2,935,000

The $1.2 million for the Bay Meadows Affordable Housing Site project for FY 2016-17 is funded from reserves set aside in prior years from residual redevelopment property tax increment the General Fund receives each year. Per Council direction, 20% of these residual revenues were dedicated for future affordable housing projects such as this project. Ongoing maintenance of City streets and roads is remains at current levels of $2 million per year, totaling $10 million for the five year period. The Council’s prior commitment of General Fund resources for street reconstruction of $2 million per year ends in FY 2016-17. Based on an analysis of the General Fund’s long range financial plan, operating demands of the City limit the ability to continue street

28 reconstruction funding and an alternative revenue source is needed to fund reconstruction of failed streets beyond FY 2016-17.

Clean Water Program: Sewer Collection and Wastewater Treatment Plant Capital Projects

Table 2-5 summarizes the CIP costs for the sewer collection system and wastewater treatment plant (WWTP), totaling $340.6 million. Of that total, $238.6 million is for improvements at the WWTP at 2050 Detroit Drive and $101.95 million is for improvements to the collection system throughout the city.

Table 2-5: Sewer Enterprise Five-Year CIP Costs Clean Water Program (Sewer) Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Sewer-Collection System 101,952,654 35,239,800 36,932,854 5,700,000 12,185,000 11,895,000 Sewer-WWTP 238,638,775 32,905,000 126,699,206 10,002,806 56,734,518 12,297,245 Sewer System 5-Year CIP Total 340,591,429 68,144,800 163,632,060 15,702,806 68,919,518 24,192,245

Sewer Infrastructure Need Sewer collections and the WWTP comprise the City’s most significant infrastructure needs, and impact the quality of life of an estimated 160,000 citizens and customers in its service area.

Similar to many sewer systems in the region, the City’s Sewer Enterprise facilities are aging and in need of significant rehabilitation. The collection system of the Sewer Enterprise dates back to the early 1900’s with the majority of sewer pipes installed in the 1940’s through 1960’s and the original structures at the WWTP constructed in 1937. Groundwater and storm water enter the City’s collection system through leaky pipes and illegal drain connections. During significant rain events the increased flow in the pipes exceeds the capacity of sewer facilities and results in overflows of diluted but untreated sewage into streets and storm drains which eventually reach creeks and the Bay. These events are termed sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs).

Moreover, regulatory requirements for wastewater treatment are evolving and becoming more stringent to protect water quality in the San Francisco Bay. In 2009, the Regional Board issued a Cease and Desist Order (CDO) to the City of San Mateo mandating elimination of waste discharges and requiring specific actions is taken by the City and its sub-regional partners (Hillsborough, Belmont, Crystal Springs County Sanitation District, and certain unincorporated areas of the County) to correct conditions which cause SSOs.

Chart 2-1: San Mateo Clean Water Program, 20-Yr Plan

As a result of these regulatory issues, extensive capital projects are necessary to bring the sewer facilities into a state of good repair, increase wet weather capacity, and meet current and future regulatory requirements. Chart 2-1 illustrates the current plan for capital projects for the next 20 years developed to meet the mandates of the CDO. Of the total $875 million, sub-regional partners and City of Foster City are estimated to contribute $140 million.

29

Since issuance of the CDO in 2009, Public Works staff has taken various actions to implement these regulatory requirements through studies, evaluations and plans with the assistance of engineering firms and consultants, and updates to these plans have been submitted to the Regional Board to maintain compliance with the permits and regulatory orders. The City is currently in the process of validating the recent Draft Integrated Wastewater Master Plan that consolidates previous master plans for the collection system and the WWTP into a single overall plan. Accordingly, the projects contained in the current capital improvement plan, their cost, timing and other factors are subject to further change.

Sewer Enterprise Five-Year CIP Costs and Funding Sources Although the Clean Water Program is a 20-year capital plan, the City’s CIP is for the first five years. Of the total $340.6 million recommended in sewer over the next five years, 19 capital projects costing $238.6 million (70%) are for the WWTP. The larger WWTP projects include: • $106.0 million new headworks and primary clarifiers replacement, • $43.15 million new flow equalization storage project, • $37.02 million program management, • $19.76 million secondary treatment capacity project,

Sewer collection system project costs total $101.95 million among 15 different projects located throughout the City. The larger sewer collections projects include: • $53.2 million South Trunk collection main upgrade, • $20.0 million citywide sewer rehabilitation, • $6.95 million Dale Avenue force main and pump station rehabilitation, • $5.70 million sewer pump station improvements

A total of $340.6 million in sewer-related funding sources are proposed, as shown in Table 2-6.

Table 2-6: Sewer Enterprise CIP by Funding Source Clean Water Program (Sewer) Funding Sources 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Crystal Spr Cnty SD/SM Cnty/Hillsborough 14,109,178 1,962,470 7,753,366 519,688 3,296,470 577,184 Foster City (Sewer) 41,295,009 5,357,790 23,729,281 1,410,582 9,230,714 1,566,642 Sewer (interfund trf) 7,496,500 2,442,500 1,155,000 1,044,000 1,885,000 970,000 Sewer Bonds 72,695,902 39,757,040 5,736,230 6,988,436 13,736,334 6,477,862 SWRCB Revolving Loan Fund 204,994,840 18,625,000 125,258,183 5,740,100 40,771,000 14,600,557 Sewer System 5-Year CIP Total 340,591,429 68,144,800 163,632,060 15,702,806 68,919,518 24,192,245

Of the total $340.6 million, 60% or $205 million is planned to be financed from the California Water Resources Control Board’s State Revolving Loan Fund Program. Subject to the Board’s approval of the loan, this financing mechanism provides the lowest interest cost ranging from 2% to 3.5%. A second funding source is the issuance of $72.7 million in sewer revenue bonds or related debt instruments, or 21% of the total. Future repayment of both the loans and bonds would be made through the pledge of sewer services revenues. Foster City’s share of WWTP capital improvements total $41.3 million, and the sub-regional partners’ share, comprised of Hillsborough, Belmont, Crystal Springs County Sanitation District (“CSCSD”), total $14.1 million.

Discussion of Projects by Service Delivery Category

The City’s entire CIP is budgeted and expensed within the General Capital Projects Fund (Fund 59), with all capital related funding sources or revenues recorded directly in the fund or resources from other City funds transferred to Fund 59. Each capital project is separately

30 accounted for with a project # within Fund 59. In order to provide an overview of the capital program, these projects are categorized by service delivery, such as streets, storm drainage or parks. Due to the enterprise funds’ private sector accounting principles, all financial transactions of the sewer and golf enterprises are reclassified at the end of the fiscal year from Fund 59 to their respective enterprise funds.

Street Rehabilitation and Reconstruction, and Traffic Improvement Projects Total street rehabilitation and reconstruction and traffic improvement projects of $31.7 million are planned for the CIP, as detailed in Table 2-7.

Of the total project costs, the largest project is the citywide street rehabilitation of $23.3 million to meet annual paving and maintenance needs of the city’s 191 miles of streets. In addition, $2.0 million for the next two years is for street reconstruction to replace a portion of the 18 miles of failed streets throughout the City. Of the total $31.7 million, the General Fund is the largest funding source contributing $14 million, followed by $8.03 million from Measure A 1/2 cent sales tax, $6.9 million from Gas Tax and Gas Tax in lieu of Proposition 42, $1.78 million in traffic impact fees, and the remaining from various grants or subventions from regional agencies.

Table 2-7: Streets-Traffic CIP Project Costs & Funding Sources Streets & Traffic Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 20th Ave/ECR SB Right Turn Lane 547,500 547,500 Citywide Sign Inventory and Replacement 250,000 250,000 Citywide Street Reconstruction 4,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 - - - Citywide Street Rehabilitation 23,305,878 5,235,878 4,570,000 4,500,000 4,500,000 4,500,000 Citywide Traffic Calming 750,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Citywide Traffic Signals 947,500 347,500 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 De Anza Boulevard/92 Ramp Improvement 187,500 - - 187,500 - - Poplar Ave/Amphlett Blvd Improvements 215,000 215,000 - - - - San Mateo Drive Sustainable Streets Project 1,300,000 1,300,000 - - - - Traffic Model Update 175,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 Corridor Transportation Mgmt Assoc (TMA) 15,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Downtown Transportation Management Assoc 30,000 30,000 Streets & Traffic 5-Year CIP Total 31,723,378 10,113,878 6,908,000 5,025,500 4,838,000 4,838,000

Streets & Traffic Funding Sources 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 C/CAG VRF - Measure M 388,878 318,878 70,000 - - - Contribution for Transp Mgt Assn 30,000 30,000 Gas Tax 895,000 695,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Gas Tax in lieu of Prop 42 (Intrfnd tfr) 6,000,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 General Fund 14,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Measure A Half Cent Sales Tax 8,032,000 2,432,000 1,400,000 1,400,000 1,400,000 1,400,000 Misc-State Grants 187,500 - - 187,500 - - SM Cnty Trans Authority Grant - Msr A 15,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 TDA Grant 400,000 400,000 - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 1,775,000 1,035,000 185,000 185,000 185,000 185,000 Streets & Traffic 5-Year CIP Total 31,723,378 10,113,878 6,908,000 5,025,500 4,838,000 4,838,000

Storm Drain / Flood Control Capital Projects A total of $2.77 million in storm drainage and flood control projects is planned in the next five years as shown in Table 15. Funding of $2.72 million for Bayfront Levee Improvement South of San Mateo Creek is for $545,000 for each of the five years funded by district property tax special assessments pledged for repayment of bonded debt. The second flood control project is funded by the General Fund for FY 2015-16 at $45,250 to complete the repair of the Ryder Park levee.

31 Table 2-8: Storm Drainage / Flood Control CIP Costs & Funding Sources Storm Drainage & Flood Control Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Bayfront Levee Improvement So of SM Creek 2,725,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 Ryder Park Levee Repair 45,250 45,250 Storm Drainage & Flood Control 5-Year CIP Total 2,770,250 590,250 545,000 545,000 545,000 545,000

Storm Drainage & Flood Control Funding Sources 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Bayfront Levee Assessment 2,725,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 General Fund 45,250 45,250 Storm Drainage & Flood Control 5-Year CIP Total 2,770,250 590,250 545,000 545,000 545,000 545,000

Funding for storm drainage and flood control is very limited while capital repair and replacement needs continue to rise. A discussion of the storm drainage and flood control infrastructure needs is provided in the Capital Needs Assessment (capital projects without a funding source) section at the end of this report.

Bridges Maintenance and Improvement Capital Projects The City has an ambitious bridge program planned to move forward with three significant projects. Of the total $261.35 million planned projects listed in Table 2-9, the largest project is the $200.3 million rail-corridor grade separation project for FY 2017-18. This project consists of a bridge along the CalTrain corridor and eliminates the at-grade rail crossing on 25th Avenue, funded with $188 million from other agencies and $12 million in traffic impact fees.

Table 2-9: Bridges CIP Project Costs & Funding Sources Bridges Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Citywide Bridge Maintenance 750,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 El Camino @ Hwy 92 Interchange Improvement 22,500,000 500,000 22,000,000 - - - Hillsdale Station Relocation Plan 36,100,000 100,000 6,000,000 30,000,000 - - Rail-Corridor Grade Separation 200,300,000 300,000 - 200,000,000 - - Bermuda Bridge Replacement 1,700,000 200,000 1,500,000 - - - Bridges 5-Year CIP Total 261,350,000 1,250,000 29,650,000 230,150,000 150,000 150,000

Bridges Funding Sources 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 C/CAG VRF - Measure M 8,000,000 - - 8,000,000 - - Federal Bridge Replacement & Rehab 1,327,950 - 1,327,950 - - - Federal Demo Grant 865,000 - 865,000 - - - High Speed Rail Authority 90,000,000 - - 90,000,000 - - Measure A Half Cent Sales Tax 400,000 250,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 - Misc-Federal Grants 16,135,000 - 16,135,000 - - - Misc-State Grants 36,722,050 100,000 6,272,050 30,100,000 100,000 150,000 Peninsula Corridor JPB Grants - Local 100,000 100,000 - - - - SM Cnty Trans Authority Grant - Msr A 90,000,000 - - 90,000,000 - - Traffic Impact Fees 12,800,000 800,000 - 12,000,000 - - Transportation - Fed Grant 5,000,000 - 5,000,000 - - - Bridges 5-Year CIP Total 261,350,000 1,250,000 29,650,000 230,150,000 150,000 150,000

The second largest project is the $36.1 million Hillsdale CalTrain Station Relocation Plan, which would identify a new station location, property needs and coordinate grade separation improvements at 28th and 31st avenues. That project is expected to be funded from various state and regional government agencies. The third bridge project is the $22.5 million El Camino Real at Highway 92 Interchange to improve freeway access safety and operation, expected to be funded by a mix of federal and other grants and traffic impact fees. Ongoing bridge maintenance and replacement continues, including the replacement of Bermuda Bridge, funded with $1.7 million from federal highway funds and other sources. Expected funding from federal and state grants and other governmental agencies are estimates and are not guaranteed until successful participation in competitive grant application processes.

32

Parking Capital Projects Recently, staff has looked at ways to help downtown parking facilities to better meet visitor needs, such as developing a San Mateo Downtown Parking Management Plan, undertaking deferred maintenance projects, implementing recommended practices for rate policy and pricing, studying utilization trends, and engaging stakeholders. The Parking Management Plan identified the need for 400 additional parking spaces downtown. The Parking CIP includes the construction of a new downtown parking garage in FY 2017-18 for a cost of $17.2 million, expected to be funded with a bond measure of which a portion of future parking revenues would be pledged for payment of annual debt service.

Utilizing the $4.35 million appropriated from the Parking Fund’s reserve to support the parking garages’ deferred maintenance needs, a total of $1.93 million for six projects were previously approved and are to begin in FY 2014-15, including repair of the Central Garage parking deck, replacing stairwells and refurbishing the elevator at the Central and El Camino Real garages, and installing security cameras and LED lighting for most of the City’s garages and parking facilities. Parking management seeks to improve the parking experience for patrons by enhancing aesthetics and safety of the facilities.

Table 2-10 details the funding plan for the future design and construction of the new downtown parking garage, with $1.2 million to be funding from the previous appropriated Parking Fund reserves and $16 million in potential parking bonds in FY 2017-18.

Table 2-10: Parking CIP Project Costs & Funding Sources Parking Facilities Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 New Downtown Parking Garage 17,200,000 200,000 1,000,000 16,000,000 - - Downtown Parking Improvements (1,200,000) (200,000) (1,000,000) - - - Parking 5-Year CIP Total 16,000,000 - - 16,000,000 - -

Parking Facilities Funding Sources 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Parking Bonds 16,000,000 - - 16,000,000 - - Parking 5-Year CIP Total 16,000,000 - - 16,000,000 - -

Park and Recreation Facilities Capital Projects A total of $7.73 million in parks and recreation capital improvement projects is planned for the next five years. Of the total planned listed in Table 2-11, the largest parks project is the $4.5 million planned for improvements to the Central Park playground beginning in FY 2016-17, followed by $2.0 million for a sports field conversion to synthetic turf in FY 2018-19. Both of these projects’ plan to be funded with park in-lieu impact fees.

Three capital projects address deferred maintenance needs of the Popular Creek Golf Course include re-sodding the fairways and drilling irrigation wells, as well as replacement of an aging irrigation pump station. Although these golf projects are required in order to maintain the level of service expected by golf course patrons, proceeding with the projects depends on sufficient green fees and revenues from the new driving range expected to open in the Spring/Summer 2015.

33

Table 2-11: Parks & Recreation CIP Project Costs & Funding Sources Parks & Recreation Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Citywide - Park Pathway Rehabilitation 225,000 225,000 - - - - Citywide - Park Play Area Upgrades 300,000 300,000 Citywide - Special Facility Upgrades in Parks 115,000 15,000 100,000 - - - Golf Course-Replace Irrigation Pump Station 200,000 - - 200,000 - - Golf Course-Re-sodding Fairways 60,000 30,000 30,000 - - - Golf Course-Well Drilling 75,000 75,000 - - - - Sports Fields Conversion Synthetic Turf 2,000,000 - - - 2,000,000 - Bay Meadows Community Park (Master Plan) 50,000 50,000 - - - - Central Park (Master Plan/Playground) 4,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 Park Site Amenities 60,000 - 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Citywide - Park Restroom Door Locks 70,000 70,000 - - - - Park Citywide Plygnd Eqp Replace/PW 75,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Parks & Recreation 5-Year CIP Total 7,730,000 780,000 2,160,000 2,730,000 2,030,000 30,000

Parks & Recreation Funding Sources 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Golf Fund (interfund tsf) 335,000 105,000 30,000 200,000 - - Park in lieu Fees 7,395,000 675,000 2,130,000 2,530,000 2,030,000 30,000 Parks & Recreation 5-Year CIP Total 7,730,000 780,000 2,160,000 2,730,000 2,030,000 30,000

In addition, six planned projects upgrade play areas, restrooms, special facilities and rebuild park trails.

Other Service Delivery Categories Capital Projects The remaining CIP projects total $11.8 million and are funded with various revenues sources as detailed below.

Table 2-12: Other Service Delivery Categories CIP Project Costs & Funding Sources Other Service Delivery Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Affordable Housing 1,866,500 90,000 1,551,500 75,000 75,000 75,000 Bikeways & Pedestrian Paths 5,675,000 1,235,000 1,110,000 1,110,000 1,110,000 1,110,000 Facilities & Buildings 2,200,000 560,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 Information Technology 755,000 455,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Miscellaneous Projects 880,566 240,566 160,000 150,000 180,000 150,000 Street Lights & Utility Undergrounding 446,615 446,615 Other Service Delivery Total 11,823,681 3,027,181 3,306,500 1,820,000 1,850,000 1,820,000

Other Service Delivery Funding Sources 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Arts in Public Places Fee 155,566 155,566 CDBG Funds 1,365,000 415,000 275,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 General Fund 6,330,000 1,450,000 2,120,000 920,000 920,000 920,000 HOME Funds 276,500 - 276,500 - - - Measure A Half Cent Sales Tax 1,975,000 475,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 Misc-State Grants 315,000 - - 105,000 105,000 105,000 PG&E Loan 248,790 248,790 PG&E Rebate 97,825 97,825 Shuttle Bus Revenue 70,000 35,000 35,000 - - - Sidewalk repair 750,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Tree Impact and Removal Fee 240,000 - 75,000 45,000 75,000 45,000 Other Service Delivery Funding Total 11,823,681 3,027,181 3,306,500 1,820,000 1,850,000 1,820,000

Other service delivery categories projects funded by the General Fund include $150,000 to install new drought resistant landscaping at City Hall, $2.05 million total for maintaining the City’s existing facilities at $410,000 per year, $1.2 million from reserves to support affordable

34 housing at Bay Meadows, investment in technology projects totaling $380,000 for new business software for parks and recreation and a new citizen information resource management system, and $2.55 million for sidewalk repair and bikeway and pedestrian path improvements.

Capital Needs Assessment and Capital Projects Without a Funding Source

Providing adequate infrastructure and facilities to support the community’s quality of life is vital to the City’s future. Despite the variety of recommended projects included in the CIP, there are a substantial number of projects without a funding source that represent important infrastructure and facilities needs waiting to be addressed by the City. These unfunded projects exceed the capacity of the City’s existing funding sources and will require additional revenues to implement.

Over the course of the past year, City staff members have developed a comprehensive list of the City’s capital, facilities and infrastructure needs aided by an independent Life Cycle Cost assessment study commissioned by the Public Works Department. A result of these efforts included the development of capital project charters for all capital needs, regardless of an identified revenue source. Capital charters for projects without a funding source are provided in the last section of this report.

Summarized in Table 2-13, capital projects lacking a funding source totaling $360 million and span across eight service delivery categories.

Table 2-13: Capital Projects Without a Funding Source by Service Delivery Category Service Delivery Category 5-Yr TOTAL FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Bikeways & Pedestrian Paths 163,403,000 26,525,000 29,732,000 56,142,000 25,902,000 25,102,000 Facilities & Buildings 35,146,540 3,206,540 3,080,000 1,660,000 1,160,000 26,040,000 Information Technology 1,030,000 530,000 500,000 - - - Miscellaneous Projects 30,000,000 - - 5,000,000 12,500,000 12,500,000 Parks & Recreation 75,000,000 - 1,465,000 7,225,000 17,285,000 49,025,000 Storm Drains & Flood Control 26,770,000 800,000 24,170,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 Street Lights & Utility Undergrounding 1,493,800 766,760 376,760 116,760 116,760 116,760 Streets & Traffic 27,184,999 1,320,714 6,475,714 6,475,714 6,462,857 6,450,000 Total 5-Yr Costs-Projects with No Funding 360,028,339 33,149,014 65,799,474 77,219,474 64,026,617 119,833,760

The largest capital need is in the bikeway and pedestrian pathways category, totaling $163.4 million or 45%, of which includes one project totaling $115 million, the citywide pedestrian scale lighting project for the installation of modern scale lighting on streets designated by the Pedestrian Master Plan. Although this project’s cost is substantial, it did not rank as a high- priority. The second largest unfunded capital need by service category is parks and recreation with a total of $75 million or 21%. The two largest parks and recreation projects without identified funding sources are Central Park (Construction) beginning in FY 2017-18 estimated to cost $31 million and Bay Meadows Community Park (Construction) in FY 2019-20 estimated to cost $35 million. Master planning efforts for both these park projects have been ongoing.

Failed Streets The City of San Mateo owns and maintains approximately 192 miles of streets. The 2012 replacement value of this asset is approximately $350 million dollars. The primary measure of effectiveness used in the Street Maintenance Pavement Management Program is the Pavement Condition Index (PCI). This measure has remained constant over the past few years due to $2.5 million allocated beginning in FY 2012-13 and $2.0 million in annual transfers from the General Fund for street reconstruction through FY 2016-17. These funds are in addition to the normal annual paving program allocation, which focuses on preventative maintenance.

35

While the overall pavement condition has maintained a PCI index of 72 (PCI above 70 considered good condition), there has been an increase in failed residential streets. In 2013, an estimate of costs to repair 19 miles of failed or failing streets totaled $34 million. It is anticipated that the number of miles of failed streets will increase at normal funding levels and may accelerate.

Table 2-14 outlines the identified street and traffic improvements infrastructure needs without a funding source. Not only is the failed street funding shortfall of $24 million included on the list, but also $2.25 million in needed alley improvements and various other traffic control systems.

Table 2-14: Streets &Traffic Capital Projects Without a Funding Source Streets & Traffic Project Costs-No Funding 5-Yr TOTAL FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Alley Improvements 2,250,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 Citywide Street Reconstruction (Future Needs) 24,000,000 - 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 Saratoga Drive Corridor Improvement Study 275,000 275,000 - - - - Traffic Controllers Cabinets 70,000 70,000 - - - - Traffic Improv – El Camino Real/Barneson Ave 500,000 500,000 - - - - Traffic Signal Improvements 89,999 25,714 25,714 25,714 12,857 - Streets & Traffic Total-No Funding Source 27,184,999 1,320,714 6,475,714 6,475,714 6,462,857 6,450,000

Flood Control Improvements On October 16, 2012, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) issued a Physical Map Revision (PMR) which removed approximately 8,000 homes in neighborhoods south of San Mateo Creek from the Special Flood Hazard Area. Unfortunately, approximately 1200 properties, located in the areas north of San Mateo Creek, including the North Shoreview and a portion of the North Central neighborhoods, remain in the flood zone. The cost of projects to protect these properties is estimated at approximately $23.5 million, comprised of the North Bayfront levee improvement project at $7.5 million and the Popular Avenue & Coyote Point pump stations at $16.0 million, as listed below in Table 2-15.

Table 2-15: Storm Drainage & Flood Control Projects Without a Funding Source Storm Drain & Flood Control Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Citywide Storm Sewer Improvements 2,500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 Columbia/Crystal Springs Storm Drain 270,000 - 270,000 - - - North Bayfront Levee Improvements Project 7,500,000 - 7,500,000 - - - Poplar Ave & Coyote Point Pump Stations Rehab 16,000,000 200,000 15,800,000 Storm System Dredging 500,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Storm Drain & Flood Control Total-No Funding 26,770,000 800,000 24,170,000 600,000 600,000 600,000

Funding for stormwater and flood control system operation and maintenance is very limited while the capital repair and replacement needs have been estimated to be approximately $85 million. San Mateo’s storm drainage system is separate and distinct from the sewer system (although both are impacted during wet weather). Because the systems are separate, sewer revenues may not be used to fund storm and flood control infrastructure improvements. In addition, imposition of a fee for storm drainage/flood control purposes is prohibited by Proposition 218 without a majority vote of property owners. As a result, there is currently no funding source for storm drainage and flood control infrastructure other than general government tax dollars. Without a dedicated funding source, the City’s flood control and storm drainage infrastructure will continue to deteriorate.

36 New Parks and Parks and Recreation Deferred Capital Needs Parks and recreation capital needs heavily rely upon Parks in Lieu Fees as a funding source. As a result, needed projects with price tags beyond the capacity of this revenue source were deferred. A total of $75 million for nine parks and recreation capital improvement projects have been identified as needed, yet have no available funding. As mentioned, construction of Central Park and Bay Meadows Community Park are two high-priority projects requiring funding of $31 million and $35 million, respectively. The next largest projects without a funding source are Laurelwood/Sugarloaf open space costing $3.6 million and the Park Play Areas at $3.8 million.

Table 2-16: Parks & Recreation Capital Projects Without a Funding Source Parks & Recreation Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Bay Meadows Community Park (Construction) 35,000,000 - - - - 35,000,000 Central Park (Construction) 31,000,000 - 500,000 5,500,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 Citywide - Park Field Renovations 50,000 - 25,000 - 25,000 Citywide - Park Play Area Upgrades (Future Needs) 3,800,000 - 550,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,050,000 Citywide – Protective Shade Structures 400,000 - - 200,000 200,000 - Citywide – Water Conservation in Parks 420,000 - 15,000 190,000 215,000 - Energy Efficient Lighting Conversion 525,000 - 25,000 225,000 275,000 - Laurelwood/Sugarloaf Open Space 3,645,000 - 300,000 - 370,000 2,975,000 Park Site Amenities (Future Needs) 160,000 - 50,000 110,000 - - Parks & Recreation Total-No Funding 75,000,000 - 1,465,000 7,225,000 17,285,000 49,025,000

Bikeway & Pedestrian Paths Capital Needs In order to implement Sustainable Streets Plan, Bicycle Master Plan and Pedestrian Master Plan, among over studies and plans, the City would need $163.7 million in additional resources.

Table 2-17: Bikeways & Pedestrian Paths Capital Projects Without a Funding Source Bikeways & Pedestrian Paths Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 20th Ave and Alameda de las Pulgas Intersection 120,000 - - 120,000 - - 25th Ave at Delaware Str Bike Box & Green Bike Lane 48,000 48,000 - - - - 3rd Ave & Norfolk Str Intersection Improvement 250,000 50,000 200,000 - - - 3rd Ave & Parrott Str Intersection Improvement 360,000 - 360,000 - - - 4th Ave and Humboldt Str Improvements 17,000 17,000 - - - - ADA Transition Plan 75,000 75,000 - - - - Alameda de las Pulgas Road Diet 600,000 - 100,000 500,000 - - Bay to Transit Trail Feasibility Study 100,000 - 100,000 - - - Citywide Pedestrian Scale Lighting 115,200,000 23,040,000 23,040,000 23,040,000 23,040,000 23,040,000 Delaware Str at Pacific Blvd Bicycle Left-Turn Pocket 48,000 48,000 - - - - Downtown Sidewalk Repair Program 2,750,000 550,000 550,000 550,000 550,000 550,000 Highway 92 Crossing Study 100,000 - - - 100,000 - Hillsdale / US 101 Bridge Overcrossing 33,000,000 - 3,000,000 30,000,000 - - Laurelwood/Sugarloaf Park Path Project 700,000 - - - 700,000 - Norfolk Str Road Diet 240,000 40,000 200,000 - - - North B Improvement Project 200,000 200,000 - - - - Pedestrian Master Plan (North Central Ped Improv) 500,000 500,000 - - - - Pedestrian Master Plan Intersection Improvement 7,560,000 1,512,000 1,512,000 1,512,000 1,512,000 1,512,000 Sustainable Streets Plan 75,000 75,000 - - - - Wayfinding Signage Program 600,000 - 300,000 300,000 - - Wheelchair Ramp Installation in Downtown 860,000 370,000 370,000 120,000 - - Bikeways & Pedestrian Paths Total-No Funding 163,403,000 26,525,000 29,732,000 56,142,000 25,902,000 25,102,000

City Facilities & Building Deferred Maintenance Needs Based on staff assessments and aided by an independent Life Cycle Cost assessment study commissioned by the Public Works Department, and estimated $35 million in unfunded projects have been identified to upgrade, repair or replace City facilities and buildings, the largest project of which is $26.5 million for the replacement of the City’s aging corporate yard.

37

Table 2-18: City Facilities & Buildings Capital Projects Without a Funding Source Facilities & Building Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 ADA Facility Improvements, City-wide 830,000 170,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 - Beresford Recreation Center Parking Lot Repair 150,000 150,000 - - - - Beresford Recreation Tennis Courts Re-surfacing 100,000 100,000 - - - - Central Park Tennis Courts Resurfacing 1,125,000 100,000 1,025,000 - - - City Hall 20th Ave Metal Roof Replacement 50,000 50,000 - - - - Corporate Yard Facility, New 26,500,000 100,000 250,000 350,000 350,000 25,450,000 Corporate Yard-Fleet Shop Improvements 300,000 300,000 - - - - Fiesta Meadows Park Parking Lots Renovation 100,000 - 100,000 - - - Fire Station 25 Bathroom Replacement 95,000 50,000 45,000 - - - Fire Station 27 Bathroom Replacement 145,000 145,000 - - - - Fire Station 27 Earthquake Evaluation 20,000 20,000 - - - - Fire Station 27 Earthquake Upgrades 500,000 500,000 - - - - J. Hart Clinton Drive Median Re-Landscaping 200,000 200,000 - - - - Japanese Garden Fencing Renovation 250,000 - 250,000 - - - Los Prados Park Building Refurbishment 75,000 75,000 - - - - Los Prados Park Parking Lots Renovation 500,000 - 500,000 - - - Los Prados Park Tennis/Basketball Courts Re-surface 331,540 331,540 - - - - New Building Component Replace (Additional Needs) 2,950,000 590,000 590,000 590,000 590,000 590,000 Park Pathways Upgrades 500,000 - - 500,000 - - Parkside Acquatic Docks Renovation 100,000 - 100,000 - - - Parkside Aquatics Interior Restrooms Refurbishment 75,000 75,000 - - - - Shoreview Parking Lot and Pathways Replacement 250,000 250,000 - - - - Facilities & Building Total-No Funding 35,146,540 3,206,540 3,080,000 1,660,000 1,160,000 26,040,000

Efforts to Identify Additional Funding Support The Council has consistently identified both the elimination of failed streets and the North Shoreview storm water/flood control improvements as key priorities at its 2015 Planning Meeting. As a result, Council directed staff to investigate new funding sources for these and other capital improvements. The results of a recent survey to gauge public support of a revenue measure were presented to the Council at the May 18th meeting. The revenue measure would not fund infrastructure exclusively. It is anticipated that the measure would also fund public safety and other general city services.

Conclusion

The graphs and tables that follow in this section illustrate an overview of the City’s capital needs and more tabular detail of the projects and funding sources. Later parts of this report in the Capital Improvement Program and Capital Needs with No Funding sections provide more detail for each capital project in the project charters.

38 Funding Source Descriptions

The City’s Capital Improvement Program is financed by a myriad of funding resources, including tax revenues, reserve balances from other city funds, fees and service charges, development impact fees, federal and state grants, dedicated subventions from various other governmental agencies, and donations, reimbursements and other contributions.

The City of San Mateo accounts for all capital project transactions in its General Capital Projects Fund (Fund 59) utilizing its financial system’s project accounting module. As a result, all expenditures are directly recorded in the Capital Fund in a respective project account, while revenues or funding sources are either deposited directly to the Fund in the respective project account or resources from other City funds are transferred into the Fund. At year-end capital expenditures related to the City’s two enterprise funds (Sewer and Golf) are re-classified from the Capital Fund to the respective enterprise fund in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles. To simplify reporting in this document, sewer and golf transferred funded resources for capital projects are categorized as fees and services. The following are descriptions of the funding resources supporting the City’s capital program.

City Funds Transfers

Transfer from General Fund The City’s Capital Fund (59) is partially supported by an annual transfer from the General Fund amongst many other funding source, and accounts for capital repairs to the City's roads, parks, and various other City facilities. In the 2015‐2020 CIP, this transfer ranges between $2.935 million and $6.135 million, with the transfer for FY 2015-16 of $5.51 million. Table 2-19 below provides detail of the planned transfers from the General Fund to support the city’s capital infrastructure project needs.

Table 2-19: General Fund Transfers for CIP Projects General Fund Transfers - CIP Projects 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Bay Meadows Affordable Housing Site 1,200,000 1,200,000 CiRM System Implementation 180,000 180,000 - - - - City Hall Landscaping-Water Conservation 150,000 150,000 - - - - Citywide Bike/Ped Path Improvements 50,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Citywide Sidewalk Repair Program 2,500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 Citywide Street Reconstruction 4,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 - - - Citywide Street Rehabilitation 10,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 New Building Component Replacement (Status Quo) 2,050,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 Parks and Recreation Business Software 200,000 200,000 - - - - Ryder Park Levee Repair 45,250 45,250 Park Citywide Plygnd Eqp Replace/PW 75,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 General Fund Transfers 5-Year CIP Total 20,450,250 5,510,250 6,135,000 2,935,000 2,935,000 2,935,000

Taxes Dedicated to Capital Needs

Gas Tax The Gas Tax Fund accounts for revenues received from the State Gas Tax and Federal and State grants earmarked for street improvements. Use of these funds is restricted to

39 maintenance of the road network system of the City. Transfers from the Gas Tax Fund support the City-wide Street Rehabilitation project, City-wide Traffic Signals project, Citywide Sign Inventory and Replacement Project, Sustainable Transportation project, and 20th Avenue/El Camino Real Southbound right Turn Lane project.

Table 2-20: Gas Tax funded CIP Projects Gas Tax funded - CIP Projects 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 20th Ave/ECR SB Right Turn Lane 197,500 197,500 Citywide Sign Inventory & Replace 250,000 250,000 Citywide Traffic Signals 447,500 247,500 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Citywide Street Rehabilitation 6,000,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 Gas Tax funded 5-Year CIP Total 6,895,000 1,895,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000

It should be noted that the level of Gas Tax receipts anticipated over the five years of the CIP is reduced, primarily as a result of reduced gas consumption resulting from increased fuel efficiency. This transportation funding source may be augmented by new programs expected to be considered by the California General Assembly in the coming years.

Measure A (County-wide) Half-Cent Sales Tax In June, 1989, the City and the San Mateo County Transportation Authority entered into “The Agreement for Distribution of San Mateo County Measure A for Local Transportation Purposes”, which was extended in January 2009. Under the agreement, the City receives an annual allocation of a specified portion of the retail transaction and use tax approved by Measure A – San Mateo County Transportation Expenditure Plan. The allocation is dedicated to improve local transportation, including streets and road improvements. The following projects are planned utilizing Measure A sales tax funding.

Table 2-21: Measure A Half-Cent Sales Tax funded CIP Projects Measure A Half-Cent Sales Tax funded - CIP 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 25th Ave Utility Undergrounding 100,000 100,000 Bermuda Bridge Replacement 200,000 200,000 Citywide Bike/Ped Path Improvements 1,500,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 Citywide Bridge Maintenance 200,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 - Citywide Street Rehabilitation 6,917,000 1,717,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 Citywide Traffic Signals 500,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Poplar Ave/Amphlett Blvd Improvements 215,000 215,000 - - - - Public Works Document Imaging 375,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 San Mateo Drive Sustainable Streets 400,000 400,000 - - - - Measure A Half-Cent Sales Tax funded Totals 10,407,000 3,157,000 1,825,000 1,825,000 1,825,000 1,775,000

Fees and Charges

Enterprise Funds and special assessments operate on a full cost recovery basis. Accordingly, all costs related to operations and capital projects are recovered through service rate charges or assessments.

Sewer Service Charges Per San Mateo Municipal Code (SMMC) Chapter 3.54, users of the sewer system and disposal facilities of the City are assessed an annual sewer service charge. The Sewer Enterprise is owned and operated by the City of San Mateo, and consists of the sewer collection systems for City residents and the sewage treatment and disposal facilities serving the residents of the City, all of Foster City (Estero Municipal Improvement District) and portions of the neighboring

40 communities (sub-regional partners) of Hillsborough, Belmont, the Crystal Springs County Sanitation District (“CSCSD”) and certain unincorporated areas of the County.

The current population of the Sewer Enterprise’s service area is approximately 160,000. The Sewer Enterprise serves approximately 27,500 customer accounts within the City of San Mateo and an additional 10,300 customer accounts in the neighboring communities (sub-regional partners). The sewer service charge is based on annual water usage and a rate which varies with the principal activity conducted upon the premises, or in accordance with the use of the premises.

Golf Course Fees Each year the City reviews and adjusts fees as part of the City Council adopted City fee manual. Generally, fees are adjusted by the cost of living adjustment (COLA) for the previous year. Typically fee increase recommendations are based on information gathered from market surveys and user meetings. Various fees are collected from patrons for using recreational facilities at the Poplar Golf Course.

South Bayfront Levee Assessments In July 2009, residents of the eastern portion of the City voted to form a flood assessment district in which property owners will pay for Bayfront levee upgrades. About 8,000 homeowners pay an annual fee, typically $28 to $76, till year 2029 to fund annual debt service payment on the San Mateo Joint Powers Financing Authority Lease Revenue Bonds (Landfill Closure Project) Series 2003 that financed storm drainage, flood control levees and other public improvements along a 1-mile span of the City's shoreline. Refer to this document’s Debt Program and Obligations for more information.

Tree Impact (Landscape Unit in-lieu) and Removal Fees As per the requirements of the Zoning Code, Section 27.71 – Landscape, all building projects must have a minimum ratio of 1 tree per 400 square feet of landscaped area. A minimum number of trees must be planted (or existing on the site). If the new trees being planted are less than the minimum requirement, the City is authorized to collect in-lieu fees from developers.

Under Heritage Tree Ordinance, the City is authorized to collect tree removal fees from homeowners when they apply for a tree permit to remove heritage tree without replanting it.

Developer Contributions

Development impact fees are collected from developers and provide funding for the City's infrastructure related to parks, community centers, and libraries. The City Attorney provides guidance on whether a project qualifies for funding

Traffic Impact Fees Per San Mateo Municipal Code (SMMC) Chapter 27.13, the Transportation Improvement Impact Fee is imposed on new development to fund city-wide traffic improvements needed to accommodate development as specified in the 2008 Traffic Mitigation Report dated June 8, 2009 as may be updated. The table on the following page details the City’s projects reliant upon Traffic Impact Fee resources.

41

Table 2-22: Traffic Impact Fee funded CIP Projects Traffic Impact Fee funded - CIP Projects 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 20th Ave/ECR SB Right Turn Lane 350,000 350,000 Citywide Traffic Calming 750,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 El Camino @ Hwy 92 Interchange Improvement 500,000 500,000 - - - - Rail-Corridor Grade Separation 12,300,000 300,000 - 12,000,000 - - San Mateo Drive Sustainable Streets Project 500,000 500,000 - - - - Traffic Model Update 175,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 Traffic Impact Fee funded 5-Year CIP Total 14,575,000 1,835,000 185,000 12,185,000 185,000 185,000

Park in lieu Fees Under Quimby Act and San Mateo Municipal Code (SMMC) Chapter 26.64, park in lieu fees are collected from developers on projects involving parcel maps, subdivision and multi-family residential projects to develop new or rehabilitate existing neighborhood or community’s park or recreational facilities. The following table details the City’s projects reliant upon Park in lieu Fee resources. Table 2-23: Park in lieu Fee funded CIP Projects Park in lieu Fee funded - CIP Projects 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Bay Meadows Community Park (Master Plan) 50,000 50,000 - - - - Central Park (Master Plan/Playground) 4,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 Citywide - Park Pathway Rehabilitation 225,000 225,000 - - - - Citywide - Park Play Area Upgrades 300,000 300,000 Citywide - Park Restroom Door Locks 70,000 70,000 - - - - Citywide - Special Facility Upgrades in Parks 115,000 15,000 100,000 - - - Park Site Amenities 60,000 - 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Sports Fields Conversion Synthetic Turf 2,000,000 - - - 2,000,000 - Park in lieu Fee funded 5-Year CIP Total 7,320,000 660,000 2,115,000 2,515,000 2,015,000 15,000

Private Contributions

Sidewalk Repair Contributions are received from homeowners for repairing sidewalk.

Municipal Bonds and Loans

Sewer Revenue Bonds Under the provisions of sections 3, 5 and 7 of article XI of the California Constitution, sections 1.03, 5.23 and 9.06 of the City Charter of the City, City of San Mateo Ordinance No. 1989-23, the City of San Mateo is authorized to issue Sewer Revenue Bonds to finance sewer capital infrastructure needs. As of June 30, 2015 the Sewer Enterprise has a total of $58.4 million in outstanding debt for its Series 2011A and for Refunding Series 2014. Payment of debt service is based on a pledge of the net revenues of the Sewer Enterprise. The Sewer Enterprise is rated AA by Standard & Poor’s and Aa2 by Moody’s. Refer to this document’s Debt Program and Obligations for more information. The Enterprise’s plan of finance includes, in part, the issuance of additional sewer revenue bonds in the future to fund a portion of the San Mateo Clean Water Program sewer improvement capital infrastructure projects, of which repayment of the debt obligations require future year increases to sewer service charges.

(California) State Water Regional Control Board (SWRCB) Revolving Loan Fund The Division of Financial Assistance (DFA) administers the implementation of the California State Water Resources Control Board’s (State Water Board) financial assistance programs that include loan and grant funding for construction of municipal sewage and water recycling

42 facilities, remediation for underground storage tank releases, watershed protection projects, and nonpoint source pollution control projects.

Under the provisions of section 6 of Article XIID of the California Constitution, the City of San Mateo is authorized to enter into loan agreements to finance sewer capital infrastructure needs. Refer to this document’s Debt Program and Obligations for more information. The Enterprise’s plan of finance includes entering into loan agreement(s) with the SWRCB in the future to fund a portion of the San Mateo Clean Water Program sewer improvement capital infrastructure projects, of which repayment of the debt obligations require future year increases to sewer service charges.

Parking Facilities Bonds As part of the CIP, the City’s Central Parking Fund has proposed reviewing the possibility of issuing municipal debt for the purpose of financing a new parking structure in the next five years. The City will be performing additional financial analysis regarding this proposal.

Grants (Federal and State)

The City is planning to apply for various grants from Federal and State Governments, which deem appropriate to fund capital projects. Grants are budgeted when award letters are received. The following is a list of the federal and state grants for which the City is planning to apply:

California High Speed Rail Authority Grant Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Federal-Aid Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program Federal Traffic Safety Categorized Projects t-21 Program (Federal Demo Grant) HOME Investment Partnership Program (Affordable Housing) Transportation Development Act Fund (TDA Grant)

Other Agencies

The City partners with local agencies to provide support to certain capital projects.

C/CAG VRF – Measure M The City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG) administers the Measure M initiative, an additional Vehicle Registration Fees (VRF) approved by the voters in November 2010, which imposes an annual fee of ten dollars ($10) on motor vehicles registered in San Mateo County to help fund transportation-related congestion mitigation and water pollution mitigation programs.

City of Foster City (Sewer Partner) Foster City has formed their sewer and water into a utility district called “Estero Municipal Improvement District” (EMID). The City and EMID entered into a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) in 1989 for construction and operation of wastewater treatment plan. The JPA has been amended various times since its inception. The City is the primary owner of and is responsible for the operation of the wastewater treatment plant. Foster City’s share of the capital improvement cost is currently based on the actual percentage of flow that the City treats which belongs to them (historically has averaged 19%).

43 Sewer Sub-Regional Partners (Crystal Springs County Sanitation District, San Mateo County, Town of Hillsborough) A Sanitary Sewage Agreement was signed in 1989 between the City, the Town of Hillsborough, Crystal Springs County Sanitation District and the County of San Mateo to establish an agreement for funding the construction cost of some sewer projects, including the wastewater treatment plant.

Peninsula Corridor JPB Grant The Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board is the governing body for the CalTrain Peninsula commuter rail transit service between San Francisco, San Jose and Gilroy. It consists of three representatives from each of the three counties served by CalTrain, San Francisco, San Mateo County and Santa Clara County. The City is planning to apply for grant from this agency to fund CalTrain related project.

San Mateo County Transportation Authority Grant – Measure A In 1998, voters of San Mateo County approved half-cent sales tax for countywide transportation projects and program, known as Measure A. In 2004, the voters reauthorized Measure A extension of the half-cent sales tax for highway and transit improvements through the year 2033, as set forth in the Transportation Expenditure Plan approved by San Mateo County Transportation Authority. The City is seeking funding from the authority to fund the Grade Separation and Rail Realignment Project.

44 Overview Charts and Capital Project Summary Tables

FY 2015-16 Capital Budget - Pie Charts

Citywide FY 2015-16 Capital Budget by Service Delivery ...... 46 Citywide FY 2015-16 Capital Budget by Funding Source ...... 47 General Governmental FY 2015-16 Capital Budget by Service Delivery ...... 48 General Governmental FY 2015-16 Capital Budget by Funding Source ...... 49 Clean Water Program (Sewer) FY 2015-16 Capital Budget by Service Delivery ...... 50 Clean Water Program (Sewer) FY 2015-16 Capital Budget by Funding Source ...... 51

2015-2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP), 5-Year Totals - Pie Charts

Citywide CIP by Service Delivery ...... 52 Citywide CIP by Funding Source ...... 53 General Governmental CIP by Service Delivery ...... 54 General Governmental CIP by Funding Source ...... 55 Clean Water Program (Sewer) CIP by Service Delivery ...... 56 Clean Water Program CIP by Funding Source ...... 57

Lists of CIP Capital Projects by Service Delivery Category and Funding Sources - Tables

List of CIP Capital Project Costs 2015-2020 ...... 58 List of CIP Capital Project Funding Source Detail 2015-2020 ...... 60

Projects with No Funding Source, 5-Year Totals - Pie Chart & Table

Citywide Projects with No Funding Source by Service Delivery ...... 64 List of CIP Capital Project With No Funding Sources 2015-2020 ...... 65

45 Chart 2-2

City of San Mateo Citywide FY 2015-16 Capital Budget

by Service Delivery Category

Sewer-WWTP Sewer-Collections $32,905,000 39% $35,239,800 42%

Streets/Traffic $10,113,878 12%

Bridges $1,250,000 1% Facilities $560,000 1% Bike/Ped Paths Info Tech $1,235,000 1% Housing $90,000 $455,000 1% 0.1% Street Lights Parks/Rec $446,615 1% $780,000 1%

Storm/Flood $590,250 1%

Total Citywide FY 2015-16 Capital Budget Costs = $84 million

46 Chart 2-3

City of San Mateo Citywide FY 2015-16 Capital Budget

by Funding Source Category

Bonds $40,005,830 48%

Gas Tax/ Measure A $5,052,000 6% SWRCB Loans $18,625,000 22% Other Agencies $7,777,138 9%

General Fund State Grants $5,510,250 7% $500,000 1%

Private Contrib Developer Contrib $277,825 0.3% Fees & Charges $2,650,566 3.2% $3,092,500 4% Fed Grants $415,000 0.5%

Total Citywide FY 2015-16 Capital Budget Revenues = $84 Million

47 Chart 2-4

City of San Mateo General Governmental FY 2015-16 Capital Budget

by Service Delivery Category

Street Reconstruction $2,000,000 13% Street Rehab $5,235,878 33% Streets/Traffic - Other $2,878,000 18%

Parks/Rec $780,000 5% Bridges $1,250,000 8%

Housing $90,000 Street Lights 1% $446,615 3% Bike/Ped Paths Storm/Flood $1,235,000 8% $590,250 4% Misc $240,566 1% Facilities $560,000 Info Tech $455,000 3% 3%

Total General Governmental FY 2015-16 Capital Budget Costs = $15.76 million

48 Chart 2-5

City of San Mateo General Governmental FY 2015-16 Capital Budget

by Funding Source Category

PG&E Street Lights Developer Contrib Loan $248,790 1% $1,990,566 13% Park in Lieu Fees $660,000 4%

Fed Grants Gas Tax/ Measure $415,000 3% A $5,052,000 32% Fees & Charges $650,000 4%

State Grants $500,000 3% General Fund $5,510,250 35%

Private Contrib $277,825 2%

Other Agencies $456,878 3%

Total General Governmental FY 2015-16 Capital Budget Revenues = $15.76 million

49 Chart 2-6

City of San Mateo Clean Water Program (Sewer) FY 2015-16 Capital Budget

by Service Delivery Category

Collection -South Trunk $23,200,000 34% WWTP -Other $15,141,000 22%

WWTP New Flow Equal Storage $2,164,000 3% Program Mgmt $5,500,000 8%

WWTP Secondary Treatment $3,000,000 4%

Collection -Sewer Rehab $4,000,000 6% Collection - Other $8,039,800 12% WWTP New Headworks & Primary Clarifier $7,100,000 11%

Total Clean Water Program (Sewer) FY 2015-16 Capital Budget Costs = $68 million

50 Chart 2-7 City of San Mateo Clean Water Program (Sewer) FY 2015-16 Capital Budget

by Funding Source Category

City of Foster City SM Sewer Service $5,357,790 8% Charges $2,442,500 4% Sub-Regional Partners $1,962,470 3%

Sewer Bonds SWRCB Revolving $39,757,040 58% Loans $18,625,000 27%

Total Clean Water Program (Sewer) FY 2015-16 Capital Budget Costs = $68 million

51 Chart 2-8

City of San Mateo Capital Improvement Program

by Service Delivery Category 5-Year Totals (2015-2020)

Bridges - Other 9%

Sewer-WWTP 36%

Bridge-Rail Corridor Grade Sewer-Collections Separation 30% 15%

Streets/Traffic 5% Info Tech 0.1% Street Lights 0.1% Housing 0.3% Parks/ Rec 1% Bike/Ped Parking 2% Storm/Flood 1% Paths 1% Misc. 0.1%

Facilities 0.3% Total Citywide CIP 5-Year Costs = $672 million

52 Chart 2-9

City of San Mateo Capital Improvement Program

by Funding Source Category 5-Year Totals (2015-2020)

Gas Tax/ Measure A $17,302,000 3%

Bonds $88,944,692 Private Contrib State Grants 13% $877,825 0.1% $127,624,550 19%

SWRCB Loans $204,994,840 30% Other Agencies $153,978,065 23%

General Fund Developer Contrib $20,450,250 3% Fees & Charges $22,050,566 3% $10,796,500 2% Fed Grants $24,969,450 4%

Total Citywide CIP 5-Year Revenues = $672 Million

53 Chart 2-10

City of San Mateo General Governmental Capital Improvement Program

by Service Delivery Category 5-Year Total (2015-2020)

Bridge-Rail Corridor Grade Separation 60% Hillsdale CalTrain Station Relocate 10.9%

El Camino @ Hwy 92 7% Bridges - Other 1% Street Rehab 7% Storm/Flood 1%

Streets/Traffic - Facilities 1% Other 1% Street Reconstruction Street Lights Bike/ Info Tech 0% 1% 0% Ped Misc. 0.3% Paths 1.7% Parking 5% Parks/Rec 2.3% Housing 1%

Total General Governmental CIP 5-Year Costs = $331 million

54 Chart 2-11

City of San Mateo General Governmental Capital Improvement Program

by Funding Source Category 5-Year Total (2015-2020)

Bonds & Loans Park in Lieu Fees $16,248,790 5% Developer Contrib $14,730,566 4% $7,320,000 2% Gas Tax/ Measure A $17,302,000 5% Fed Grants $24,969,45 0 8% Fees & Charges $3,300,000 1% State Grants General Fund $127,624,550 39% $20,450,250 6%

Other Agencies $98,573,878 30%

Private Contrib $877,825 0.3%

Total General Governmental CIP 5-Year Revenues = $331 million

55 Chart 2-12

City of San Mateo Clean Water Program (Sewer) Capital Improvement Program

by Service Delivery Category 5-Year Total (2015-2020)

Collection - Other $28,752,654 8% Collection -Sewer Rehab $20,000,000 6%

WWTP New Headworks & Collection -South Primary Clarifier Trunk $53,200,000 $106,000,000 31% 16%

Program Mgmt WWTP New Flow $37,025,862 11% Equal Storage $43,150,000 13%

WWTP -Other $32,702,913 9% WWTP Secondary Treatment $19,760,000 6%

Total Clean Water Program (Sewer) CIP 5-Year Costs = $340.6 million

56 Chart 2-13

City of San Mateo Clean Water Program (Sewer) Capital Improvement Program

by Funding Source Category 5-Year Total (2015-2020)

SM Sewer Service Charges $7,496,500 2% Sub-Regional Partners $14,109,178 4% City of Foster City Sewer Bonds $41,295,009 12% $72,695,902 22%

SWRCB Revolving Loans $204,994,840 60%

Total Clean Water Program (Sewer) CIP 5-Year Costs = $340.6 million

57 TABLE 2-24 CITY OF SAN MATEO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, 2015 - 2020 LIST OF CAPITAL PROJECTS COSTS BY SERVICE DELIVERY CATEGORY

SERVICE DELIVERY CATEGORY 5-Yr TOTAL FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Affordable Housing 1,866,500 90,000 1,551,500 75, 000 75,000 75,000 Bay Meadows Affordable Housing Site 1,476,500 - 1,476,500 - - - Minor Home Repair 390,000 90,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Bikeways & Pedestrian Paths 5,675,000 1,235,000 1,110,000 1,110,000 1, 110,000 1, 110,000 CDBG Concrete Repairs 875,000 275,000 150, 000 150, 000 150,000 150,000 Citywide Bike/Ped Path Improvements 1,550,000 310,000 310, 000 310, 000 310,000 310,000 Citywide Sidewalk Repair Program 3,250,000 650,000 650, 000 650, 000 650,000 650,000 Bridges 261,350,000 1,250,000 29,650,000 230,150,000 150,000 150,000 Citywide Bridge Maintenance 750,000 150,000 150, 000 150, 000 150,000 150,000 Hillsdale Station Relocation Plan 36,100,000 100,000 6,000,000 30,000,000 - - Rail-Corridor Grade Separation 200,300,000 300,000 - 200,000,000 - - Bermuda Bridge Replacement 1,700,000 200,000 1,500,000 - - - El Camino @ Hwy 92 Interchange 22,500,000 500,000 22,000,000 - - - Clean Water Program (Sewer) 340,591,429 68,144,800 163,632,060 15,702,806 68,919,518 24,192,245 41st/Pacific Pump Station Upgrade (SST-17) 3,260,000 490,000 2,770,000 City Wide Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation 20,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 Closed Circuit TV Sewer Inspection 2,000,000 400,000 400, 000 400, 000 400,000 400,000 Collection System SCADA 1,158,120 1,158,120 - - - - Dale Avenue Relief (LPS-4) 1,515,000 - - - 250,000 1,265,000 Delaware Mainline Sewer Rehabilitation ------Los Prados No. 1 Pump Station Upgrades 2,744,534 411,680 2,332,854 - - - Root Foaming 1,000,000 200,000 200, 000 200, 000 200,000 200,000 Sanitary Sewer I / I Reduction 400,000 200,000 200,000 Sewer Pump Station Improvements 5,700,000 3,500,000 - 1,100,000 - 1,100,000 South Trunk System Upgrade 53,200,000 23,200,000 30,000,000 - - - Digester Gas to Compressed Natural Gas ------WWTP Aeration Blower Replacement 1,301,429 - - - - 1,301,429 WWTP Annual Major Components 2,500,000 500,000 500, 000 500, 000 500,000 500,000 WWTP SCADA & Plant Control System (PCS) 3,100,000 3,100,000 - - - - Inflow/Infiltrattion Reduction Study 540,000 540,000 - - - - Tank Drain Pump Replacement 150,000 - 150, 000 - - - Dale Ave NEW Wet Force Main/Pump Station 230,000 230,000 - - - - Dale Ave Existing Force Main & Pump Station 6,950,000 1,400,000 - - 5,550,000 - Disinfect-Imm Proj-Hypo Day/Bisulfite Tank 2,750,000 2,750,000 - - - - Electrical: Immediate Projects 300,000 100,000 100, 000 100, 000 - - Gravity Thickener 1 & 2 3,009,000 2,809,000 200, 000 - - - New Administration Bldg - Corp Yard/WWTP 4,997,608 - - - 4,997,608 - New Flow Equalization Storage 43,150,000 2,164,000 - - 40, 986,000 - On-Site Stormwater Improvements 5,740,000 - - 865, 000 - 4,875,000 Program Mgmt – Clean Water Program 37,025,862 5,500,000 7,116,330 8,537,806 10, 250,910 5,620,816 SEC System - SCs 1-4&RAS Pump Valve 4,440,000 4,240,000 200, 000 - - - Secondary Treatment Capacity 19,760,000 3,000,000 16,760,000 - - - Short-Term Motor-Control-Cabinet ------Solids Bldg Immed Projs–Boiler 700,000 700,000 - - - - Solids Bldg Immed Projs-Centrifuge Hoist 742,000 742,000 - - - - Stress Test WWTP Master Plan Enviro Doc 200,000 200,000 - - - - WWTP Hopper, Cake Pump/Bldg Enclosure 2,772,876 - 2,772,876 - - - WWTP New Headworks & Primary Clarifiers 106,000,000 7,100,000 98,900,000 41st/Pacific Pump Stat–New Force (SST-13) 2,540,000 380,000 2,160,000 South Delaware/Bay Meadows Paral(SST-3) 715,000 - - - 715,000 - Facilities & Buildings 2,200,000 560,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 City Hall Landscaping-Water Conservation 150,000 150,000 - - - - New Bldg Component Replace (S Quo) 2,050,000 410,000 410, 000 410, 000 410,000 410,000 Information Technology 755,000 455,000 75, 000 75, 000 75,000 75,000 Parks and Recreation Business Software 200,000 200,000 - - - - Public Works Document Imaging 375,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 CiRM System Implementation 180,000 180,000 - - - - Miscellaneous Projects 880,566 240,566 160,000 150,000 180,000 150,000 CDBG Community Non-Profit Facilities 100,000 50,000 50,000 - - - San Mateo Commuter Shuttle 385,000 35,000 35,000 105, 000 105,000 105,000

58 TABLE 2-24 CITY OF SAN MATEO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, 2015 - 2020 LIST OF CAPITAL PROJECTS COSTS BY SERVICE DELIVERY CATEGORY

SERVICE DELIVERY CATEGORY 5-Yr TOTAL FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Art in Public Places 155,566 155,566 Citywide Tree Planting – Parks Division 240,000 - 75,000 45,000 75,000 45,000 Parking 16,000,000 - - 16,000,000 - - New Downtown Parking Garage 17,200,000 200,000 1,000,000 16,000,000 - - Downtown Parking Improvements (1,200,000) (200,000) (1,000,000) - - - Parks & Recreation 7,730,000 780,000 2,160,000 2,730,000 2, 030,000 30,000 Citywide - Park Pathway Rehabilitation 225,000 225,000 - - - - Citywide - Park Play Area Upgrades 300,000 300,000 Golf Course-Re-sodding Fairways 60,000 30,000 30,000 - - - Golf Course-Well Drilling 75,000 75,000 - - - - Sports Fields Conversion Synthetic Turf 2,000,000 - - - 2,000,000 - Central Park (Master Plan/Playground) 4,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 Park Site Amenities 60,000 - 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Citywide - Park Restroom Door Locks 70,000 70,000 - - - - Park Citywide Plygnd Eqp Replace/PW 75,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Bay Meadows Community Park (M Plan) 50,000 50,000 - - - - Citywide - Special Facility Upgrades-Parks 115,000 15,000 100, 000 - - - Golf Course- Irrigation Pump Station 200,000 - - 200, 000 - - Storm Drainage & Flood Control 2,770,250 590,250 545,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 Ryder Park Levee Repair 45,250 45,250 Bayfront Levee Improv So of SM Creek 2,725,000 545,000 545, 000 545, 000 545,000 545,000 Street Lights & Utility Undergrounding 446,615 446,615 25th Ave Utility Undergrounding 100,000 100,000 Citywide Street Lights 346,615 346,615 Streets & Traffic 31,723,378 10,113,878 6,908,000 5,025,500 4, 838,000 4, 838,000 20th Ave/ECR SB Right Turn Lane 547,500 547,500 Citywide Street Reconstruction 4,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 - - - Citywide Street Rehabilitation 23,305,878 5,235,878 4,570,000 4,500,000 4,500,000 4,500,000 Citywide Traffic Calming 750,000 150,000 150, 000 150, 000 150,000 150,000 Citywide Traffic Signals 947,500 347,500 150, 000 150, 000 150,000 150,000 Traffic Model Update 175,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 Citywide Sign Inventory/Replacement 250,000 250,000 Corridor Transp Mgmt Assoc (TMA) 15,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 De Anza Boulevard/92 Ramp 187,500 - - 187, 500 - - Downtown Transp Mgmt Assoc 30,000 30,000 Poplar Ave/Amphlett Blvd 215,000 215,000 - - - - San Mateo Drive Sustainable Streets 1,300,000 1,300,000 - - - - Grand Total 671,988,738 $ 83,906,109 206,201,560 271,973,306 78,332,518 31,575,245

59 TABLE 2-25 CITY OF SAN MATEO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, 2015 - 2020 LIST OF CAPITAL PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE DETAIL

FUNDING SOURCE DETAIL 5-Yr TOTAL FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Arts in Public Places Fee 155,566 155,566 Art in Public Places 155,566 155,566 Bayfront Levee Assessment 2,725,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 Bayfront Levee Improv So of SM Creek 2,725,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 C/CAG VRF - Measure M 8,388,878 318,878 70,000 8, 000,000 - - Citywide Street Rehabilitation 388,878 318,878 70,000 - - - Rail-Corridor Grade Separation 8,000,000 - - 8,000,000 - - CDBG (interfund trf) 1,365,000 415,000 275,000 225,000 225,000 225,000 CDBG Community Non-Profit Facilities 100,000 50,000 50,000 - - - CDBG Concrete Repairs 875,000 275,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Minor Home Repair 390,000 90,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Contribution for Transp Mgt Assn 30,000 30,000 Downtown Transp Mgmt Assoc 30,000 30,000 Crystal Spr Cnty SD/SM Cnty/Hillsborough 14,109,178 1,962,470 7, 753,366 519,688 3,296,470 577,184 Digester Gas to Compressed Natural Gas (175,000) (175,000) - - - - Tank Drain Pump Replacement 10,500 - 10,500 - - - WWTP Aeration Blower Replacement 91,100 - - - - 91,100 WWTP Annual Major Components 175,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 WWTP SCADA & Plant Control System (PCS) 217,000 217,000 - - - - Dale Ave NEW Wet Force Main/Pump Station 16,100 16,100 - - - - Dale Ave Existing Force Main & Pump Station 486,500 98,000 - - 388,500 - Disinfect-Imm Proj-Hypo Day/Bisulfite Tank 192,500 192,500 - - - - Electrical: Immediate Projects 21,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 - - Gravity Thickener 1 & 2 210,630 196,630 14,000 - - - New Administration Bldg - Corp Yard/WWTP 35,983 - - - 35,983 - New Flow Equalization Storage 2,459,160 - - - 2,459,160 - On-Site Stormwater Improvements 401,800 - - 60,550 - 341,250 Program Mgmt – Clean Water Program 1,606,364 330,000 371,565 417,138 377,827 109,834 SEC System - SCs 1-4&RAS Pump Valve 310,800 296,800 14,000 - - - Secondary Treatment Capacity 1,383,200 210,000 1,173,200 - - - Short-Term Motor-Control-Cabinet ------Solids Bldg Immed Projs–Boiler 49,000 49,000 - - - - Solids Bldg Immed Projs-Centrifuge Hoist 51,940 51,940 - - - - Stress Test WWTP Master Plan Enviro Doc 11,500 11,500 - - - - WWTP Hopper, Cake Pump/Bldg Enclosure 194,101 - 194,101 - - - WWTP New Headworks & Primary Clarifiers 6,360,000 426,000 5,934,000 Fed Regional Improv Prog 5,000,000 - 5, 000,000 - - - El Camino @ Hwy 92 Interchange 5,000,000 - 5,000,000 - - - Federal Bridge Replacement & Rehab 1,327,950 - 1, 327,950 - - - Bermuda Bridge Replacement 1,327,950 - 1,327,950 - - - Federal Demo Grant 865,000 - 865,000 - - - El Camino @ Hwy 92 Interchange 865,000 - 865,000 - - - Foster City (Sewer) 41,295,009 5,357,790 23,729,281 1, 410,582 9,230,714 1,566,642 Digester Gas to Compressed Natural Gas (475,000) (475,000) - - - - Tank Drain Pump Replacement 28,500 - 28,500 - - - WWTP Aeration Blower Replacement 247,272 - - - - 247,272 WWTP Annual Major Components 475,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 WWTP SCADA & Plant Control System (PCS) 589,000 589,000 - - - - Disinfect-Imm Proj-Hypo Day/Bisulfite Tank 522,500 522,500 - - - - Electrical: Immediate Projects 57,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 - - Gravity Thickener 1 & 2 571,710 533,710 38,000 - - - New Administration Bldg - Corp Yard/WWTP 322,845 - - - 322,845 - New Flow Equalization Storage 7,787,340 - - - 7,787,340 - On-Site Stormwater Improvements 1,090,600 - - 164,350 - 926,250 Program Mgmt – Clean Water Program 4,509,416 1,045,000 1,008,535 1,132,232 1,025,529 298,120 SEC System - SCs 1-4&RAS Pump Valve 843,600 805,600 38,000 - - - Secondary Treatment Capacity 3,754,400 570,000 3,184,400 - - - Short-Term Motor-Control-Cabinet ------

60 TABLE 2-25 CITY OF SAN MATEO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, 2015 - 2020 LIST OF CAPITAL PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE DETAIL

FUNDING SOURCE DETAIL 5-Yr TOTAL FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Solids Bldg Immed Projs–Boiler 133,000 133,000 - - - - Solids Bldg Immed Projs-Centrifuge Hoist 140,980 140,980 - - - - Stress Test WWTP Master Plan Enviro Doc 30,000 30,000 - - - - WWTP Hopper, Cake Pump/Bldg Enclosure 526,846 - 526,846 - - - WWTP New Headworks & Primary Clarifiers 20,140,000 1,349,000 18,791,000 Gas Tax 895,000 695,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 20th Ave/ECR SB Right Turn Lane 197,500 197,500 Citywide Traffic Signals 447,500 247,500 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Citywide Sign Inventory/Replacement 250,000 250,000 Gas Tax in lieu of Prop 42 (Intrfnd tfr) 6,000,000 1,200,000 1, 200,000 1, 200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 Citywide Street Rehabilitation 6,000,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 General Fund (interfund trf) 20,450,250 5,510,250 6, 135,000 2, 935,000 2,935,000 2,935,000 Bay Meadows Affordable Housing Site 1,200,000 1,200,000 CiRM System Implementation 180,000 180,000 - - - - City Hall Landscaping-Water Conservation 150,000 150,000 - - - - Citywide Bike/Ped Path Improvements 50,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Citywide Sidewalk Repair Program 2,500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 Citywide Street Reconstruction 4,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 - - - Citywide Street Rehabilitation 10,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Park Citywide Plygnd Eqp Replace/PW 75,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Parks and Recreation Business Software 200,000 200,000 - - - - Ryder Park Levee Repair 45,250 45,250 New Bldg Component Replace (S Quo) 2,050,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 Golf Fund (interfund tsf) 335,000 105,000 30,000 200,000 - - Golf Course-Re-sodding Fairways 60,000 30,000 30,000 - - - Golf Course-Well Drilling 75,000 75,000 - - - - Golf Course- Irrigation Pump Station 200,000 - - 200,000 - - High Speed Rail Authority 90,000,000 - - 90,000,000 - - Rail-Corridor Grade Separation 90,000,000 - - 90,000,000 - - HOME (interfund trf) 276,500 - 276,500 - - - Bay Meadows Affordable Housing Site 276,500 - 276,500 - - - Measure A Half Cent Sales Tax 10,407,000 3,157,000 1, 825,000 1, 825,000 1,825,000 1,775,000 25th Ave Utility Undergrounding 100,000 100,000 Bermuda Bridge Replacement 200,000 200,000 Citywide Bike/Ped Path Improvements 1,500,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 Citywide Bridge Maintenance 200,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 - Citywide Street Rehabilitation 6,917,000 1,717,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 Citywide Traffic Signals 500,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Public Works Document Imaging 375,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Poplar Ave/Amphlett Blvd 215,000 215,000 - - - - San Mateo Drive Sustainable Streets 400,000 400,000 - - - - Misc-Federal Grants 16,135,000 - 16,135,000 - - - El Camino @ Hwy 92 Interchange 16,135,000 - 16,135,000 - - - Misc-State Grants 37,224,550 100,000 6, 272,050 30,392,500 205,000 255,000 Bermuda Bridge Replacement 172,050 - 172,050 - - - Citywide Bridge Maintenance 550,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 150,000 Hillsdale Station Relocation Plan 36,000,000 - 6,000,000 30,000,000 - - San Mateo Commuter Shuttle 315,000 - - 105,000 105,000 105,000 De Anza Boulevard/92 Ramp 187,500 - - 187,500 - - Park in lieu Fees 7,320,000 660,000 2, 115,000 2, 515,000 2,015,000 15,000 Central Park (Master Plan/Playground) 4,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 Citywide - Park Pathway Rehabilitation 225,000 225,000 - - - - Citywide - Park Play Area Upgrades 300,000 300,000 Citywide - Park Restroom Door Locks 70,000 70,000 - - - - Park Site Amenities 60,000 - 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Sports Fields Conversion Synthetic Turf 2,000,000 - - - 2,000,000 - Bay Meadows Community Park (M Plan) 50,000 50,000 - - - - Citywide - Special Facility Upgrades-Parks 115,000 15,000 100,000 - - -

61 TABLE 2-25 CITY OF SAN MATEO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, 2015 - 2020 LIST OF CAPITAL PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE DETAIL

FUNDING SOURCE DETAIL 5-Yr TOTAL FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Parking Bonds 16,000,000 - - 16,000,000 - - New Downtown Parking Garage 16,000,000 - - 16,000,000 - - Parking interfund transfer ------Downtown Parking Improvements (1,200,000) (200,000) (1,000,000) - - - New Downtown Parking Garage 1,200,000 200,000 1,000,000 - - Peninsula Corridor JPB Grants - Local 100,000 100,000 - - - - Hillsdale Station Relocation Plan 100,000 100,000 - - - - PG&E Loan 248,790 248,790 Citywide Street Lights 248,790 248,790 PG&E Rebate 97,825 97,825 Citywide Street Lights 97,825 97,825 Sewer (interfund trf) 7,496,500 2,442,500 1, 155,000 1, 044,000 1,885,000 970,000 Closed Circuit TV Sewer Inspection 2,000,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 Inflow/Infiltrattion Reduction Study 540,000 540,000 - - - - Root Foaming 1,000,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Sanitary Sewer I / I Reduction 400,000 200,000 200,000 Tank Drain Pump Replacement 111,000 - 111,000 - - - WWTP Annual Major Components 1,850,000 370,000 370,000 370,000 370,000 370,000 Electrical: Immediate Projects 222,000 74,000 74,000 74,000 - - Program Mgmt – Clean Water Program 500,000 500,000 - - - - Stress Test WWTP Master Plan Enviro Doc 158,500 158,500 - - - - South Delaware/Bay Meadows Paral(SST-3) 715,000 - - - 715,000 - Sewer Bonds 2016 39,757,040 39,757,040 - - - - City Wide Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation 4,000,000 4,000,000 - - - - Collection System SCADA 1,158,120 1,158,120 - - - - Delaware Mainline Sewer Rehabilitation ------Digester Gas to Compressed Natural Gas 650,000 650,000 - - - - Los Prados No. 1 Pump Station Upgrades 411,680 411,680 - - - - Sewer Pump Station Improvements 3,500,000 3,500,000 - - - - South Trunk System Upgrade 4,575,000 4,575,000 - - - - WWTP SCADA & Plant Control System (PCS) 2,294,000 2,294,000 - - - - Dale Ave NEW Wet Force Main/Pump Station 213,900 213,900 - - - - Dale Ave Existing Force Main & Pump Station 1,302,000 1,302,000 - - - - Disinfect-Imm Proj-Hypo Day/Bisulfite Tank 2,035,000 2,035,000 - - - - Gravity Thickener 1 & 2 2,078,660 2,078,660 - - - - New Flow Equalization Storage 2,164,000 2,164,000 - - - - Program Mgmt – Clean Water Program 3,625,000 3,625,000 - - - - SEC System - SCs 1-4&RAS Pump Valve 3,137,600 3,137,600 - - - - Secondary Treatment Capacity 2,220,000 2,220,000 - - - - Short-Term Motor-Control-Cabinet ------Solids Bldg Immed Projs–Boiler 518,000 518,000 - - - - Solids Bldg Immed Projs-Centrifuge Hoist 549,080 549,080 - - - - WWTP New Headworks & Primary Clarifiers 5,325,000 5,325,000 Sewer Bonds 2017 5,736,230 - 5, 736,230 - - - Program Mgmt – Clean Water Program 5,736,230 - 5,736,230 - - - Sewer Bonds 2018 6,988,436 - - 6, 988,436 - - Program Mgmt – Clean Water Program 6,988,436 - - 6,988,436 - - Sewer Bonds 2019 13,736,334 - - - 13,736,334 - Dale Avenue Relief (LPS-4) 250,000 - - - 250,000 - New Administration Bldg - Corp Yard/WWTP 4,638,780 - - - 4,638,780 - Program Mgmt – Clean Water Program 8,847,554 - - - 8,847,554 - Sewer Bonds 2020 6,477,862 - - - - 6,477,862 Dale Avenue Relief (LPS-4) 1,265,000 - - - - 1,265,000 Program Mgmt – Clean Water Program 5,212,862 - - - - 5,212,862 Shuttle Bus Revenue 70,000 35,000 35,000 - - - San Mateo Commuter Shuttle 70,000 35,000 35,000 - - - Sidewalk repair 750,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Citywide Sidewalk Repair Program 750,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000

62 TABLE 2-25 CITY OF SAN MATEO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, 2015 - 2020 LIST OF CAPITAL PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE DETAIL

FUNDING SOURCE DETAIL 5-Yr TOTAL FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 SM Cnty Trans Authority Grant - Msr A 90,015,000 3,000 3,000 90,003,000 3, 000 3, 000 Rail-Corridor Grade Separation 90,000,000 - - 90,000,000 - - Corridor Transp Mgmt Assoc (TMA) 15,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 SWRCB Revolving Loan Fund 204,994,840 18,625,000 125,258,183 5,740,100 40,771,000 14,600,557 41st/Pacific Pump Station Upgrade (SST-17) 3,260,000 490,000 2,770,000 City Wide Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation 16,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 Los Prados No. 1 Pump Station Upgrades 2,332,854 2,332,854 Sewer Pump Station Improvements 2,200,000 - - 1,100,000 - 1,100,000 South Trunk System Upgrade 48,625,000 18,625,000 30,000,000 - - - WWTP Aeration Blower Replacement 963,057 - - - - 963,057 Dale Ave Existing Force Main & Pump Station 5,161,500 5,161,500 Gravity Thickener 1 & 2 148,000 - 148,000 New Flow Equalization Storage 30,739,500 30,739,500 - On-Site Stormwater Improvements 4,247,600 640,100 3,607,500 SEC System - SCs 1-4&RAS Pump Valve 148,000 148,000 Secondary Treatment Capacity 12,402,400 12,402,400 WWTP Hopper, Cake Pump/Bldg Enclosure 2,051,929 - 2,051,929 - - - WWTP New Headworks & Primary Clarifiers 74,175,000 74,175,000 41st/Pacific Pump Stat–New Force (SST-13) 2,540,000 380,000 2,160,000 TDA Grant 400,000 400,000 - - - - San Mateo Drive Sustainable Streets 400,000 400,000 - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 14,575,000 1,835,000 185,000 12,185,000 185,000 185,000 20th Ave/ECR SB Right Turn Lane 350,000 350,000 Citywide Traffic Calming 750,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Rail-Corridor Grade Separation 12,300,000 300,000 - 12,000,000 - - Traffic Model Update 175,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 El Camino @ Hwy 92 Interchange 500,000 500,000 - - - - San Mateo Drive Sustainable Streets 500,000 500,000 - - - - Tree Impact and Removal Fee 240,000 - 75,000 45,000 75,000 45,000 Citywide Tree Planting – Parks Division 240,000 - 75,000 45,000 75,000 45,000 Grand Total 671,988,738 83,906,109 206,201,560 271,973,306 78,332,518 31,575,245

63 Chart 2-14 City of San Mateo Capital Needs Assessment Capital Projects With No Funding Source

5-Year Total (2015-2020) By Service Delivery Category

Information Streets & Traffic Technology Street Lights $27,184,999 8% $1,030,000 0.3% $1,493,800 0.4%

Storm/ Flood Bike/ Ped Paths - Control Other $48,203,000 $26,770,000 7% 13% Bay Meadows Park $35,000,000 10% Citywide Central Park Pedestrian $31,000,000 9% Lighting $115,200,000 32% Recycled Water Distrib $30,000,000 8% Facilities Parks & Rec - $35,146,540 10% Other $9,000,000 3%

Total Capital Projects With No Funding Source = $360 Million

64 TABLE 2-26 CITY OF SAN MATEO CAPITAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT, 2015 - 2020 LIST OF CAPITAL PROJECTS WITH NO FUNDING SOURCES PROJECTS WITH AN "*" ARE RANKED "HIGH PRIORITY"

SERVICE DELIVERY CATEGORY 5-Yr TOTAL FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Information Technology 1,030,000 530,000 500,000 - - - Building Access System Upgrade/Replacement 460,000 460,000 - - - - Contracts Management System 70,000 70,000 - - - - Document Management System * 500,000 - 500,000 - - - Bikeways & Pedestrian Paths 163,403,000 26,525,000 29,732,000 56,142,000 25,902,000 25,102,000 20th Avenue/Alameda de las Pulgas Intersection 120,000 - - 120,000 - - 25th Ave at Delaware Str Bike Box & Green Bike Lane 48,000 48,000 - - - - 3rd Ave & Norfolk Street Intersection Improvement 250,000 50,000 200,000 - - - 3rd Ave & Parrott Street Intersection Improvement 360,000 - 360,000 - - - 4th Ave and Humboldt Street Improvements 17,000 17,000 - - - - ADA Transition Plan * 75,000 75,000 - - - - Alameda de las Pulgas Road Diet 600,000 - 100,000 500,000 - - Bay to Transit Trail Feasibility Study 100,000 - 100,000 - - - Citywide Pedestrian Scale Lighting 115,200,000 23,040,000 23,040,000 23,040,000 23,040,000 23,040,000 Delaware Str at Pacific Blvd Bicycle Left-Turn Pocket 48,000 48,000 - - - - Downtown Sidewalk Repair Program * 2,750,000 550,000 550,000 550,000 550,000 550, 000 Highway 92 Crossing Study 100,000 - - - 100,000 - Hillsdale / US 101 Bridge Overcrossing 33,000,000 - 3, 000,000 30,000,000 - - Laurelwood/Sugarloaf Park Path Project 700,000 - - - 700,000 - Norfolk Str Road Diet * 240,000 40,000 200,000 - - - North B Improvement Project * 200,000 200,000 - - - - Pedestrian Master Plan (North Central Ped Improv) 500,000 500,000 - - - - Pedestrian Master Plan Intersection Improvement 7,560,000 1,512,000 1, 512,000 1, 512,000 1, 512,000 1,512,000 Sustainable Streets Plan * 75,000 75,000 - - - - Wayfinding Signage Program 600,000 - 300,000 300,000 - - Wheelchair Ramp Installation in Downtown * 860,000 370,000 370,000 120,000 - - Facilities & Buildings 35,146,540 3,206,540 3, 080,000 1, 660,000 1, 160,000 26,040,000 ADA Facility Improvements, City-wide * 830,000 170,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 - Beresford Recreation Center Parking Lot Repair * 150,000 150,000 - - - - Beresford Recreation Tennis Courts Re-surfacing * 100,000 100,000 - - - - Central Park Tennis Courts Resurfacing * 1,125,000 100,000 1, 025,000 - - - City Hall 20th Ave Metal Roof Replacement 50,000 50,000 - - - - Corporate Yard Facility, New 26,500,000 100,000 250,000 350,000 350,000 25,450,000 Corporate Yard-Fleet Shop Improvements 300,000 300,000 - - - - Fiesta Meadows Park Parking Lots Renovation 100,000 - 100,000 - - - Fire Station 25 Bathroom Replacement 95,000 50,000 45,000 - - - Fire Station 27 Bathroom Replacement 145,000 145,000 - - - - Fire Station 27 Earthquake Evaluation * 20,000 20,000 - - - - Fire Station 27 Earthquake Upgrades * 500,000 500,000 - - - - J. Hart Clinton Drive Median Re-Landscaping 200,000 200,000 - - - - Japanese Garden Fencing Renovation 250,000 - 250,000 - - - Los Prados Park Building Refurbishment * 75,000 75,000 - - - - Los Prados Park Parking Lots Renovation 500,000 - 500,000 - - - Los Prados Park Tennis/Basketball Courts Re-surfacing 331,540 331,540 - - - - New Bldg Component Replacement (Additional Needs) * 2,950,000 590,000 590,000 590,000 590,000 590, 000 Park Pathways Upgrades 500,000 - - 500,000 - - Parkside Acquatic Docks Renovation 100,000 - 100,000 - - - Parkside Aquatics Interior Restrooms Refurbishment * 75,000 75,000 - - - - Shoreview Parking Lot and Pathways Replacement 250,000 250,000 - - - - Miscellaneous Projects 30,000,000 - - 5, 000,000 12,500,000 12,500,000 Recycled Water Distribution System * 30,000,000 - - 5, 000,000 12,500,000 12,500,000 Parks & Recreation 75,000,000 - 1, 465,000 7, 225,000 17,285,000 49,025,000 Bay Meadows Community Park (Construction) * 35,000,000 - - - - 35,000,000 Central Park (Construction) * 31,000,000 - 500,000 5, 500,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 Citywide - Park Field Renovations 50,000 - 25,000 - 25,000 Citywide - Park Play Area Upgrades (Future Needs) * 3,800,000 - 550,000 1, 000,000 1, 200,000 1,050,000 Citywide – Protective Shade Structures 400,000 - - 200,000 200,000 - Citywide – Water Conservation in Parks 420,000 - 15,000 190,000 215,000 - Energy Efficient Lighting Conversion 525,000 - 25,000 225,000 275,000 - Laurelwood/Sugarloaf Open Space * 3,645,000 - 300,000 - 370,000 2,975,000 Park Site Amenities (Future Needs) 160,000 - 50,000 110,000 - -

65 TABLE 2-26 CITY OF SAN MATEO CAPITAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT, 2015 - 2020 LIST OF CAPITAL PROJECTS WITH NO FUNDING SOURCES PROJECTS WITH AN "*" ARE RANKED "HIGH PRIORITY"

SERVICE DELIVERY CATEGORY 5-Yr TOTAL FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Storm Drains & Flood Control 26,770,000 800,000 24,170,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 Citywide Storm Sewer Improvements 2,500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500, 000 Columbia/Crystal Springs Storm Drain 270,000 - 270,000 - - - North Bayfront Levee Improvements Project * 7,500,000 - 7, 500,000 - - - Poplar Ave & Coyote Point Pump Stations Rehab * 16,000,000 200,000 15,800,000 Storm System Dredging 500,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100, 000 Street Lights & Utility Undergrounding 1,493,800 766,760 376,760 116,760 116,760 116,760 City Wide Lead Base Paint Abatement 583,800 116,760 116,760 116,760 116,760 116, 760 Citywide Street Lights (Future Needs) * 910,000 650,000 260,000 - - - Streets & Traffic 27,184,999 1,320,714 6, 475,714 6, 475,714 6, 462,857 6,450,000 Alley Improvements 2,250,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450, 000 Citywide Street Reconstruction (Future Needs) * 24,000,000 - 6, 000,000 6, 000,000 6, 000,000 6,000,000 Saratoga Drive Corridor Improvement Study 275,000 275,000 - - - - Traffic Controllers Cabinets 70,000 70,000 - - - - Traffic Improvements – El Camino Real/Barneson Ave 500,000 500,000 - - - - Traffic Signal Improvements 89,999 25,714 25,714 25,714 12,857 - Grand Total 360,028,339 33,149,014 65,799,474 77,219,474 64,026,617 119,833,760

66 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Program Project Charters

67

68 STREETS & TRAFFIC Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Overview The intent of Streets and Traffic Capital Program is to identify street maintenance priorities, as well as traffic improvement projects, that will benefit the City. Total street rehabilitation, reconstruction and traffic improvement projects of $31.7 million are planned for the CIP, as detailed in Table 3-1 below.

Table 3-1 Streets & Traffic Proposed CIP Project Costs & Funding Sources Streets & Traffic Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 20th Ave/ECR SB Right Turn Lane 547,500 547,500 Citywide Sign Inventory and Replacement 250,000 250,000 Citywide Street Reconstruction 4,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 - - - Citywide Street Rehabilitation 23,305,878 5,235,878 4,570,000 4,500,000 4,500,000 4,500,000 Citywide Traffic Calming 750,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Citywide Traffic Signals 947,500 347,500 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 De Anza Boulevard/92 Ramp Improvement 187,500 - - 187,500 - - Poplar Ave/Amphlett Blvd Improvements 215,000 215,000 - - - - San Mateo Drive Sustainable Streets Project 1,300,000 1,300,000 - - - - Traffic Model Update 175,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 Corridor Transportation Mgmt Assoc (TMA) 15,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Downtown Transportation Management Assoc 30,000 30,000 Streets & Traffic 5-Year CIP Total 31,723,378 10,113,878 6,908,000 5,025,500 4,838,000 4,838,000

Streets & Traffic Funding Sources 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 C/CAG VRF - Measure M 388,878 318,878 70,000 - - - Contribution for Transp Mgt Assn 30,000 30,000 Gas Tax 895,000 695,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Gas Tax in lieu of Prop 42 (Intrfnd tfr) 6,000,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 General Fund 14,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Measure A Half Cent Sales Tax 8,032,000 2,432,000 1,400,000 1,400,000 1,400,000 1,400,000 Misc-State Grants 187,500 - - 187,500 - - SM Cnty Trans Authority Grant - Msr A 15,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 TDA Grant 400,000 400,000 - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 1,775,000 1,035,000 185,000 185,000 185,000 185,000 Streets & Traffic 5-Year CIP Total 31,723,378 10,113,878 6,908,000 5,025,500 4,838,000 4,838,000

Of the total project costs, the largest project is the citywide street rehabilitation of $23.3 million to meet annual paving and maintenance needs of the city’s 191 miles of streets. In addition, $2.0 million for the next two years is recommended for street reconstruction to replace a portion of the 18 miles of failed streets throughout the City. Of the total $31.7 million, the General Fund is the largest funding source contributing $14 million, followed by $8.03 million from Measure A 1/2 cent sales tax, $6.85 million from Gas Tax, $1.775 million in traffic impact fees, and the remaining from various grants and subventions from regional agencies.

Projects Justification

These 10 projects’ charters are provided in this section, as well as the Signal System Capital Recovery project charter previously adopted by Council in previous years which is expected to be completed within the next several years.

This section includes charters for a number of significant transportation improvement projects including those at 20th/El Camino Real, along the Poplar Corridor and at the SR92/De Anza Ramp. This program funds our traffic programs which ensure efficient traffic flow along our signalized network, and provide for speeding and cut-through traffic reduction to protect our local neighborhoods.

69 STREETS & TRAFFIC Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: 20th Ave/ECR SB Right Turn Lane Project No.: 467005 Purpose: This project will design and construct a new southbound left turn on El Camino Real at 20th Avenue. The existing Caltrans ROW will be widened to accommodate the exclusive southbound right-turn lane.

Objectives: Improve the intersection operation and LOS.

Business Priority: As part of the City's Traffic Mitigation Program, this project has been identified as necessary in order to improve traffic circulation and intersection LOS.

CIP Category: Improve quality of life Boundary The project requires the adjacent property to give ROW to Caltrans for the left turn lane. Conditions: Caltrans will give the City an easement for the sidewalk and utilities.

Location: El Camino Real at 20th Avenue Project Manager: Tracy Scramaglia, Senior Engineer Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 90,000 Expended & Encumbered (73,808) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 16,192 Additional CIP Request 547,500 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 563,692

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 547,500 547,500 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 547,500 547,500 - - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Traffic Impact Fee 350,000 350,000 Gas Tax 197,500 197,500 CIP Funding Totals 547,500 547,500 - - - -

70 STREETS & TRAFFIC Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Citywide Sign Inventory and Replacement Project No.: 466607 Purpose: Create a GIS inventory of signs Citywide, including information such as: word description, MUTCD sign code, material, location, height, roadway direction, condition, digital photo, and reflectivity assessment. This project will also install signs with an immediate need for replacement.

Objectives: This project will develop the following: • Comprehensive database of all traffic signs within the City of San Mateo with ability to update it outside of ArcMap software. • Sign Replacement Plan including detailed budget and schedule to ensure the most efficient replacement.

Business Priority: This project has been identified as a high priority in the Public Works Work Plan. According to the MUTCD, City’s must have a method in place to identify sign reflectivity levels and an implementation plan for replacement of regulatory, warning and ground-mounted guide signs (except street name signs) by January 2015. Street name signs and overhead guide signs must be replaced by January 2018.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary There are limited resources for sign replacement. Conditions: Location: City-wide Project Manager: Tracy Scramaglia, Senior Engineer Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional CIP Request 250,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 250,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - - Construction 250,000 250,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 250,000 250,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Gas Tax 250,000 250,000 CIP Funding Totals 250,000 250,000 - - - -

71 STREETS & TRAFFIC Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Citywide Street Reconstruction Project No.: 467774 Purpose: Reconstruct failed streets and reduce the backlog of failed streets.

Objectives: • Eliminate potential claims due to pot holes exist on roadway. • Make localized base failure repairs and rehabilitate these streets with new layer of asphalt concrete. • Increase service life of street segments for at least 15 years. • Increase PCI of these segments (<30) to 100. • Enhance the serviceability of these segments.

Business Priority: Reconstruct as many failed streets as possible and protect our asset.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary City Council approved General Funds of $2.5 M in FY 2012-13 and $2 M for four years to fund Conditions: failed streets. Failed streets are defined based on Pavement Management Program (PMP) having Pavement Condition Index (PCI) less than 30. The main focus of using this fund is to fix as many local streets as possible since local streets are not eligible to compete for federal and state grants. A additional $24 million in funding is required to fix all the City’s failed streets.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Otis Chan, Senior Engineer Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 11,323,006 Expended & Encumbered (9,676,173) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 1,646,833 Additional CIP Request 4,000,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 5,646,833

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 300,000 150,000 150,000 Construction 3,700,000 1,850,000 1,850,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 4,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 AB 2928, State Grant - Transportation Grant - General Fund (interfund trf) 4,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Measure A Half-cent Sales Tax - Gas Tax (interfund trf) - Prop 1B State Bond Act 2006 - CIP Funding Totals 4,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 - - -

72 STREETS & TRAFFIC Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Citywide Street Rehabilitation Project No.: 467004 Purpose: Perform annual street rehabilitation on our roadway system.

Objectives: • Eliminate potential claims due to pot holes exist on roadway. • Increase PCI of street segments to 100. • Enhance the serviceability of these segments. • Increase the service life of street segments for about 10 years.

Business Priority: The annual street resurfacing and street improvement program is designed to maintain safe and functional City streets. The City utilizes a Pavement Management Program (PMP), as recommended by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), to optimize the use of funds on those streets which will be the most cost effective for maintenance and rehabilitation. Assumes funding through FY 2019-20 is consistent with prior year funding plan.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary Selected street segments are recommended based on PMP data. In order to continue Conditions: maintaining and up-keeping our overall PCI level of 70 and above, the current funding level does not address any failed streets; however, we do set aside $200,000 to $300,000 annually to make localized base failed repairs on failed streets.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Otis Chan, Senior Engineer Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 62,329,881 Expended & Encumbered (60,298,197) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 2,031,684 Additional CIP Request 23,305,878 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 25,337,562

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 2,100,000 500,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 Construction 21,205,878 4,735,878 4,170,000 4,100,000 4,100,000 4,100,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 23,305,878 5,235,878 4,570,000 4,500,000 4,500,000 4,500,000

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 General Fund (interfund trf) 10,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 Measure A Half-Cent Sales Tax 6,917,000 1,717,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 Gas Tax in lieu Prop 42 6,000,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 C/CAG VRF - Measure M 388,878 318,878 70,000 Transportation Grant - CIP Funding Totals 23,305,878 5,235,878 4,570,000 4,500,000 4,500,000 4,500,000

73 STREETS & TRAFFIC Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Citywide Traffic Calming Project No.: 466600 Purpose: This project is for the development and implementation of the Citywide traffic calming program (known as the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program or NTMP), and for installation of traffic calming devices.

Objectives: The program will: • Discourage cut through traffic on local residential streets. • Slow down vehicles on local roadways. • Install various traffic calming devices when identified by a traffic calming study to be appropriate. • Update the existing NTMP to meet current City policies.

Business Priority: In October 2006, City Council adopted the NTMP. The Program’s policy is to make residential streets as quiet and safe as possible. The measures identified in this document are intended to slow down traffic and discourage through traffic on residential streets, while keeping our neighborhoods accessible to police, fire, ambulance services, and the residents of San Mateo.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary The current Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP) is based on functional Conditions: classifications. In order to be aligned with the intentions of the Sustainable Streets Plan, the Traffic Calming Plan will need to be revised and based on an alternative to functional classification, such as typologies.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Tracy Scramaglia, Senior Engineer Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 1,293,914 Expended & Encumbered (1,110,251) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 183,663 Additional CIP Request 750,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 933,663

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 150,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Construction 600,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 750,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Traffic Impact Fees 750,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 CIP Funding Totals 750,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000

74 STREETS & TRAFFIC Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Citywide Traffic Signals Project No.: 466004 Purpose: This project is for the replacement and upgrade to signal systems throughout City. It includes installation of new signal equipment, controllers and cabinets, as well as the study and evaluation of citywide signal systems.

Objectives: The project will achieve the following: • Reduce pollution by creating more efficient signal timings along signal corridors. • Increase safety by upgrading signals to current standards and evaluating intersections for signal warrants.

Business Priority: This project is an ongoing high priority for the Public Works Department in order to provide efficient and safe intersection Citywide.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary The City operates/maintains/owns 83 traffic signals within its jurisdiction. The main focus of this Conditions: fund is to conduct various studies to keep existing signals operating efficiently, conducting warrant analysis of intersections for new traffic signals, implementation of upgrades and safety improvements, as well as coordination analysis.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Tracy Scramaglia, Senior Engineer Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 90,000 Expended & Encumbered (81,380) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 8,620 Additional CIP Request 947,500 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 956,120

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 347,500 227,500 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Construction 600,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 947,500 347,500 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Traffic Impact Fees - CEC Grant - Measure A Half-Cent Sales Tax 500,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Gas Tax 447,500 247,500 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 CIP Funding Totals 947,500 347,500 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000

75 STREETS & TRAFFIC Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Corridor Transportation Management Association (TMA) Project No.: 461109 Purpose: The purpose of the TMA is to oversee transportation demand management (“TDM”) program implementation within the area subject to the Plan (“Plan Zone”), arrange for shared parking, as appropriate, market TDM services and programs in the Plan Zone and coordinate TDM measures with other agencies and members, coordinate with the City on annual trip generation monitoring for completed projects within the Plan Zone, participate in annual reporting to the San Mateo City Council with regard to trip generation information of developments within the Plan Zone, and consult with members as to trip reduction options if trip generation goals are not being met.

Objectives: To support the activities of the TMA.

Business Priority: Support the activities of the TMA in the monitoring of the TOD concepts identified in the San Mateo Rail Corridor Plan.

CIP Category: Improve quality of life Boundary The City is a non-voting, non-dues paying member of the TMA. Public Works is responsible to Conditions: conduct annual traffic counts and provide an annual update as to the progress of the TMA to the San Mateo City Council.

Project Manager: Gary Heap, Engineering Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 95,000 Expended & Encumbered (85,254) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 9,746 Additional CIP Request 15,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 24,746

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other 15,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 15,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 SM Corridor TMA Contrib 15,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 CIP Funding Totals 15,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000

76 STREETS & TRAFFIC Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: De Anza Boulevard/92 Ramp Improvement Project No.: 467006 Purpose: This project will design and construct a new westbound off ramp from 92 onto De Anza Boulevard in order to eliminate the pork chop island.

Objectives: Improve the off ramp safety.

Business Priority: This project has been identified as a high priority by the Fire Department due to two (2) accidents involving cars exiting the off ramp and crashing into the fire bay.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary This project is within Caltrans right-of-way and will require coordination. A funding source for Conditions: this project has not yet been identified but may be funded through a grant.

Location: Hwy. 92 Off-ramp at DeAnza Blvd Project Manager: Tracy Scramaglia, Senior Engineer Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional CIP Request 187,500 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 187,500

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 30,000 30,000 Construction 150,000 150,000 Other 7,500 7,500 Annual Cashflow Totals 187,500 - - 187,500 - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 State Grant-TBD 187,500 187,500 CIP Funding Totals 187,500 - - 187,500 - -

77 STREETS & TRAFFIC Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Downtown Transportation Management Association Project No.: 461110 Purpose: Development of a Downtown Transportation Management Association (TMA) to identify Transportation Demand Measures (TDM) for the Downtown.

Objectives: Reduce single vehicle occupancy trips in the Downtown and identify opportunities for multi-modal transportation.

Business Priority: The Downtown Transportation Management Association is a high priority. CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary None. Conditions: Project Manager: Tracy Scramaglia, Senior Engineer Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 101,509 Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance 101,509 Additional CIP Request 30,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 131,509

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - - Construction - - Other 30,000 30,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 30,000 30,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Developer Contribution 30,000 30,000 CIP Funding Totals 30,000 30,000 - - - -

78 STREETS & TRAFFIC Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Poplar Ave / Amphlett Blvd Improvements Project No.: 466602 Purpose: To improve traffic safety along the Poplar Avenue corridor between the US 101 ramps and Humboldt Street.

Objectives: Improve the safety along the Poplar Corridor between Humboldt and the US 101 ramps. This will be done by reducing or providing better control of the conflicting turning movements at Poplar/Amphlett, Poplar/Idaho and Poplar/Humboldt.

Business Priority: This project has been identified by City Council as a high priority due to the high number accidents at the intersection US 101 on/off ramps and Amphlett Blvd.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary Additional improvements beyond the original scope of the project have been identified on Conditions: Humboldt. Traffic will be diverted to Humboldt due to the construction of the median on Poplar from the ramps to the intersection with Idaho. Additional improvements to Humboldt include irrigation for street trees and green streets landscaping.

Location: Poplar Ave Corridor, US 101 to Humboldt St Project Manager: Tracy Scramaglia, Senior Engineer Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 1,923,100 Expended & Encumbered (622,353) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 1,300,747 Additional CIP Request 215,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 1,515,747

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 30,000 30,000 Construction 120,000 120,000 Other 65,000 65,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 215,000 215,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 SM Cnty Trans Auth Grant - Measure A Half-Cent Sales Tax 215,000 215,000 CIP Funding Totals 215,000 215,000 - - - -

79 STREETS & TRAFFIC Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: San Mateo Drive Sustainable Streets Project No.: 467007 Purpose: Implementation of the Sustainable Streets Plan project recommendation for San Mateo Drive.

Objectives: • Perform a road diet from Peninsula to Poplar Avenues • Install a Class II bicycle lane from Peninsula to Tilton Drive • Upgrade the traffic signals at Poplar/San Mateo and Tilton/San Mateo • Install curb extensions at intersections • Install Green Street features on San Mateo Drive • Install pedestrian scale lighting

Business Priority: The project is the implementation of Bicycle Master Plan Recommendation 5.1.2 and a Sustainable Streets project recommendation on San Mateo Drive form Peninsula to Tilton.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary Due to a number of neighborhood complaints regarding the sideswipes and knocked Conditions: mirrors, the public is supportive of the road diet, however, additional public outreach will need to occur. Undergrounding of the utilities is and option and may impact the overall design and timing of the project. Overall, funding for the project will be through a combination of grants and existing City funds, such as the Traffic Signal account for the signal upgrades at Poplar/San Mateo Drive and Tilton/San Mateo Drive, however, funds should be set aside in grant are not awarded. The budget below is the total budget without grants funds. If grant funds were awarded, the amounts below would be reduced.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Kenneth Chin, Project Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional CIP Request 1,300,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 1,300,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 1,300,000 1,300,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 1,300,000 1,300,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 TDA Grants 400,000 400,000 Traffic Impact Fees 500,000 500,000 Measure A Half-Cent Sales Tax 400,000 400,000 CIP Funding Totals 1,300,000 1,300,000 - - - -

80 STREETS & TRAFFIC Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Signal System Capital Recovery Project No.: 465533 Purpose: To ensure funding to purchase equipment.

Objectives: This project recovers expenses to replace damaged equipment caused by accidents, i.e. traffic accidents or some kind of unforeseen damage.

Business Priority: Ongoing, high priority.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary Project funding is used to pay for unforeseen traffic signal maintenance needs. Conditions: Location: City-wide Project Manager: Ray Jackson, Public Works Field Maintenance Manager Department: Public Works Department, Maintenance Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 405,200 Expended & Encumbered (157,078) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 248,122 Additional CIP Request - Total Project 5-Yr CIP 248,122

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other - Annual Cashflow Totals ------

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Measure A Sales Tax - Gas Tax - CIP Funding Totals ------

81 STREETS & TRAFFIC Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Traffic Model Update Project No.: 466601 Purpose: This project will develop a Citywide traffic model to planning horizon year 2030. The model will be consistent with ABAG projections and the County’s C/CAG-VTA traffic model. The City’s model is being developed by a consultant who will operate the model under contract when it is complete. The model is used for planning purposes for new development proposals in the City.

Objectives: The updated model will: • Improve the validation for local streets in San Mateo. • Develop transportation forecasts for San Mateo’s future transportation alternatives. • Update the City’s land use files.

Business Priority: The City’s model update is required as part of the General Plan update. Also, the City intends on utilizing the CCAG/VTA model, which incorporates land use updates provided by the City.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary The model update needs to be completed prior to the General Plan update. Clarification on Conditions: whether to use LOS has not been determined yet. Further analysis may be required after acceptance of the model. Maintenance of the model is required on an annual basis.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Tracy Scramaglia, Senior Engineer Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 800,197 Expended & Encumbered (607,140) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 193,057 Additional CIP Request 175,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 368,057

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 17,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 Construction 157,500 31,500 31,500 31,500 31,500 31,500 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 175,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Traffic Impact Fees 175,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 Advanced Planning Fees - CIP Funding Totals 175,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000

82 BRIDGES Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Overview The City has an ambitious bridge program with the recommendation to move forward with three significant projects. Of the total $261.35 million planned projects listed in Table 3-2, the biggest project is the $200 million rail-corridor grade separation project for FY 2017-18. This project constructs a bridge along the CalTrain corridor and eliminates the at-grade rail crossing on 25th Avenue. Funding plan is $188 million from other agencies and $12 million in traffic impact fees.

Table 3-2 Bridges Recommended CIP Project Costs & Funding Sources Bridges Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Citywide Bridge Maintenance 750,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 El Camino @ Hwy 92 Interchange Improvement 22,500,000 500,000 22,000,000 - - - Hillsdale Station Relocation Plan 36,100,000 100,000 6,000,000 30,000,000 - - Rail-Corridor Grade Separation 200,300,000 300,000 - 200,000,000 - - Bermuda Bridge Replacement 1,700,000 200,000 1,500,000 - - - Bridges 5-Year CIP Total 261,350,000 1,250,000 29,650,000 230,150,000 150,000 150,000

Bridges Funding Sources 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 C/CAG VRF - Measure M 8,000,000 - - 8,000,000 - - Federal Bridge Replacement & Rehab 1,327,950 - 1,327,950 - - - Federal Demo Grant 865,000 - 865,000 - - - High Speed Rail Authority 90,000,000 - - 90,000,000 - - Measure A Half Cent Sales Tax 400,000 250,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 - Misc-Federal Grants 16,135,000 - 16,135,000 - - - Misc-State Grants 36,722,050 100,000 6,272,050 30,100,000 100,000 150,000 Peninsula Corridor JPB Grants - Local 100,000 100,000 - - - - SM Cnty Trans Authority Grant - Msr A 90,000,000 - - 90,000,000 - - Traffic Impact Fees 12,800,000 800,000 - 12,000,000 - - Transportation - Fed Grant 5,000,000 - 5,000,000 - - - Bridges 5-Year CIP Total 261,350,000 1,250,000 29,650,000 230,150,000 150,000 150,000

Expected to be funded from various state and regional government agencies, the $36 million Hillsdale Station (CalTrain) Relocation Plan would identify a new station location, property needs, and coordinate the 25th Avenue grade separation with additional roadway connection improvements at 28th and 31st Avenues, according to the San Mateo Rail Corridor and Hillsdale Station Area Plans. The third bridge project is the $22.5 million El Camino Real at Highway 92 Interchange to improve freeway access safety and operation, expected to be funded by a mix of federal and other grants and traffic impact fees. Ongoing bridge maintenance and replacement continues, including the replacement of Bermuda Bridge, funded with $1.7 million from federal highway funds and other sources.

Projects Justification The rail projects including the grade separation, the roadway connection projects and the station relocation are consistent with the San Mateo Rail Corridor and Hillsdale Station Area Plans and provide the supporting infrastructure to be able to completely build-out the development envisioned by the Rail Corridor Plan. The improvements will provide better access to the train stations for the most densely portions of the development area while also providing east-west connectivity which will allow for continued implementation of the Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies needed to make the corridor area development successful. The improvements also support the future electrification of the Caltrain system.

83 BRIDGES Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

The bridge improvement and maintenance projects provide for the replacement of bridges reaching the end of their design life, and provide for annual maintenance to extend the design life to the fullest.

The SR92/El Camino Real Interchange project provides for a modified interchange which will provide a number of benefits to the community. The project will Improve traffic flows on the SR92 main line will construct improved bicycle and pedestrian improvements to enhance the users experience along the El Camino Real corridor between 17th and 20th Avenues.

84 BRIDGES Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Bermuda Bridge Replacement Project No.: 462246 Purpose: Make Bermuda Drive Bridge seismically safe.

Objectives: • Replace unsound bridge with new bridge. • Maintaining access to Bermuda Drive local area during construction. • Maintain utility service during construction. • Perform construction with least impact to environmental habitat.

Business Priority: Project is in line with Caltrans annual bridge inspections. This bridge is an essential part of the City’s infrastructure.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary Caltrans inspects all bridges in the City of San Mateo and provides maintenance and repair Conditions: recommendations based on their bi-annual reports. Based from Caltrans inspection report, the Bermuda Bridge is recommended to be rehabilitated due to structural deficiency. Funding for this project is comprised with Federal funds and Measure A matching funds.

Location: Bermuda Drive between Annapolis Drive and Fiesta Drive Project Manager: Evan Albert, Associate Engineer Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 872,514 Expended & Encumbered (657,234) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 215,280 Additional CIP Request 1,700,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 1,915,280

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 200,000 200,000 Construction 1,500,000 1,500,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 1,700,000 200,000 1,500,000 - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Fed Hw y Bridge Replace 1,327,950 1,327,950 Measure A Half-Cent Sales Tax 200,000 200,000 State Grant 172,050 172,050 CIP Funding Totals 1,700,000 200,000 1,500,000 - - -

85 BRIDGES Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Citywide Bridge Maintenance Project No.: 462004 Purpose: Annual concrete bridge deck treatment.

Objectives: Perform routine treatment on existing concrete bridge deck like Methacrylate or minor concrete repair on concrete bridge decks to extend the useful life of City bridges.

Business Priority: Caltrans inspects all bridges in the City of San Mateo and provides maintenance and repair recommendations based on their bi-annual bridge reports. The bi-annual bridge inspection reports recommend the best treatment practices to treat or repair concrete bridge decks.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary Bridges are selected based on Caltrans inspection reports. Measure A is used to fund these Conditions: routine maintenance projects.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Otis Chan, Senior Engineer Department: Public Works, Department, Engineer Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 752,600 Expended & Encumbered (678,414) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 74,186 Additional CIP Request 750,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 824,186

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 150,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Construction 600,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 750,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Measure A Half-Cent Sales Tax 200,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 State Grant 550,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 150,000 CIP Funding Totals 750,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000

86 BRIDGES Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: El Camino @ Hwy 92 Interchange Improvement Project No.: 462225 Purpose: To reconstruct the interchange to improve freeway operation at SR 92/ECR interchange.

Objectives: • To improve the safety of the interchange by eliminating the short weave section between existing loop ramps, • To improve traffic circulation of the intersection, • To improve pedestrian and bicycle mobility of in the area of the interchange.

Business Priority: Reconstruction of the interchange will improve safety and traffic circulation in the City of San Mateo.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary This improvement has been identified as a priority by the SMCTA. Design will be completed by Conditions: Caltrans. Full funding for construction has yet to be identified. A mix of funding sources will be needed for this project. The City will only be responsible for a portion of the project cost.

Location: El Camino @ Hwy 92 Project Manager: Gary Heap, Engineering Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 3,398,200 Expended & Encumbered (2,526,868) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 871,332 Additional CIP Request 22,500,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 23,371,332

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 500,000 500,000 Construction 20,000,000 20,000,000 Other 2,000,000 2,000,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 22,500,000 500,000 22,000,000 - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Federal Highw ay - Fed Reg Imprv Prog 5,000,000 5,000,000 Federal Demo Grant 865,000 865,000 Traffic Impact Fee 500,000 500,000 Federal Grant - TBD 16,135,000 16,135,000 CIP Funding Totals 22,500,000 500,000 22,000,000 - - -

87 BRIDGES Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Hillsdale Station (CalTrain) Relocation Plan Project No.: 462204 Purpose: The purpose of this project is to further develop the location and concept for a new Hillsdale CalTrain Station as specified in the Hillsdale Station Area Plan. Objectives: • Identify station location and property needs. • Coordinate improvements with grade separations at 28th and 31st avenues. • Identify project cost. • Conceptual design of the station.

Business Priority: The Hillsdale CalTrain Station is the most frequently used train stations in San Mateo and one of the highest utilized along the Peninsula. Relocation of the station will be required with the future grade separation project and electrification of the CalTrain corridor. Construction of the grade separations, relocation of the train platform between 28th and 31st avenues, and construction of a new Hillsdale CalTrain Station will support the transit oriented development concepts envisioned within the San Mateo Rail Corridor Area.

CIP Category: Major services and equipment replacement Boundary This project ties directly with the improvements along the CalTrain corridor including the Conditions: relocation of the Hillsdale CalTrain Station, grade separations, and electrification of the CalTrain corridor. A mix of funding sources will be needed for this project. The City will only be responsible for a portion of the project cost.

Location: Hillsdale CalTrain Station Project Manager: Gary Heap, Engineering Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Prior Yrs Budget 250,000 Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance 250,000 Additional CIP Request 36,100,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 36,350,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 6,100,000 100,000 6,000,000 Construction 30,000,000 30,000,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 36,100,000 100,000 6,000,000 30,000,000 - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Traffic Impact Fees - Penn Cor JPB Grants-Local 100,000 100,000 State Grant - TBD 36,000,000 6,000,000 30,000,000 CIP Funding totals 36,100,000 100,000 6,000,000 30,000,000 - -

88 BRIDGES Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Rail-Corridor Grade Separation Project No.: 462202 Purpose: The purpose of this project is to improve safety along the CalTrain corridor by eliminating the at-grade rail crossing on 25th Avenue. This project will raise the tracks sufficiently to allow for construction of the grade crossings at 28th and 31st avenues.

Objectives: • Provide safe grade crossings at 25th, 28th and 31st avenues. • Improve vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle safety. • Promote the transit oriented development concepts identified in the San Mateo Rail Corridor Plan. • Improve east-west multi-modal circulation in Corridor Area.

Business Priority: Construction of the grade separations, relocation of the train platform between 28th and 31st avenues, and construction of a new Hillsdale CalTrain Station will support the transit oriented development concepts envisioned within the San Mateo Rail Corridor Area.

CIP Category: Necessary for public health and safety. Boundary The timing of this project is critical. Work must be coordinate with the CalTrain plan for corridor Conditions: electrification and plans to bring high speed rail to the Peninsula. Full construction funding has not been identified. This project will require coordination with adjacent property owners including a need for property acquisition.

Location: Rail Crossing @ 25th, 28th, 31st Avenue Project Manager: Gary Heap, Engineering Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 3,748,156 Expended & Encumbered (419,647) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 3,328,509 Additional CIP Request 200,300,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 203,628,509

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 40,300,000 300,000 40,000,000 Construction 160,000,000 160,000,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 200,300,000 300,000 - 200,000,000 - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Traffic Impact Fees 12,300,000 300,000 12,000,000 HSRA 90,000,000 90,000,000 SA MCTA 90,000,000 90,000,000 C/C A G & MTC 8,000,000 8,000,000 CIP Funding Totals 200,300,000 300,000 - 200,000,000 - -

89

90 STREET LIGHTS & UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Overview Street Lights and Utility Undergrounding has significant City need with limited funding sources available for projects. The table below outlines the 5-year CIP improvement projects totaling $446,615.

Table 3-3 Street Lights & Utility Undergrounding Recommended CIP Project Costs & Funding Sources Street Lights & Utility Undergrounding Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 25th Ave Utility Undergrounding 100,000 100,000 - - - - Citywide Street Lights 346,615 346,615 - - - - Street Lights & Utility Undergrounding 5-Year CIP Total 446,615 446,615 - - - -

Street Lights & Utility Undergrounding Funding Sources 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Measure A Half Cent Sales Tax 100,000 100,000 PG&E Loan 248,790 248,790 PG&E Rebate 97,825 97,825 Street Lights/Utility Undergrounding 5-Year CIP Total 446,615 446,615 - - - -

Project Justifications Undergrounding utilities increases the aesthetic beauty of neighborhoods, as well as the property values, by removing unsightly poles, wires and boxes in the public right-of-way or easements. It allows for sidewalks to be free and clear of obstructions and proper ADA passage to be provided.

The City maintains over 7,500 street lights. Approximately 550 street lights are powered by high- voltage circuits for which parts are increasingly difficult to obtain. In addition, the high voltage lights are connected in series. If one wire was broken, all of the lights connected to that circuit would be out of service, which creates a maintenance challenge to City crews and potential safety concerns to the community. It is necessary to convert these high-voltage circuits to low-voltage circuits which will enable City crews to obtain parts and perform maintenance as needed as well as reduce energy consumption.

These two projects’ charters are provided in this section, as well as the LED Retrofit & High Voltage Conversion project charter funded by a California Energy Commission $3.0 million loan adopted by Council in FY 2014-15 which is expected to be completed within the next several years.

91 STREET LIGHTS & UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: 25th Ave Utility Undergrounding Project No.: 464402 Purpose: Provide reliable utility and communication services to the neighborhood and make it a safer area for pedestrians.

Objectives: • Remove overhead wires, communication facilities and overhead structures to underground. • Remove joint poles exist in public right of ways. • Enhance the aesthetic of the underground district. • Improve pedestrian safety. • Add green infrastructure.

Business Priority: This project is in accordance with the Hillsdale Station Area Plan and the Pedestrian Mater Plan. This project is beneficial to the businesses on 25th Avenue for the project will attract more pedestrian and bicycle traffic.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary The undergrounding portion of the project is funded by Rule 20A. This underground district was Conditions: established and approved by the City Council. The approved street is W. 25th Avenue, from El Camino Real to Hacienda Street. The bicycle and pedestrian improvements are funded by project 462202. There is a need for $100,000 to complete the green infrastructure improvements associated with this project.

Location: W. 25th Avenue, from El Camino Real to Hacienda Street Project Manager: Evan Albert, Associate Engineer Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 1,299,300 Expended & Encumbered (171,931) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 1,127,369 Additional CIP Request 100,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 1,227,369

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 100,000 100,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 100,000 100,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 PUC Grant - Measure A Half-Cent Sales Tax 100,000 100,000 CIP Funding Totals 100,000 100,000 - - - -

92 STREET LIGHTS & UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Citywide Street Lights Project No.: 463004 Purpose: This project will convert high voltage (HV) series lighting to low voltage parallel (LV) lighting. It will replace the remaining post top fixtures and florescent fixtures with LEDs.

Objectives: Enhance street light system for vehicles, pedestrians and bicycles, which will provide the following: • Improved safety for crews/residents. • Maintenance cost savings. • Energy Savings.

Business Priority: This project was approved by City Council in FY 2014-15 and is a high priority due to the age of the infrastructure and the need to make streetlights more energy efficient.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary Annual projects in this program were generated from inspections and condition assessments Conditions: performed during the previous years. This project account is also used to fund miscellaneous repairs to street lights generated from other sources such as maintenance public service requests.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Tracy Scramaglia, Senior Engineer and Ray Jackson, Field Maintenance Manager Department: Public Works, Engineering and Maintenance

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 2,439,919 Expended & Encumbered (1,850,031) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 589,888 Additional Capital Need 346,615 Total Project Need 936,503

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 346,615 346,615 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 346,615 346,615 - - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 PG&E Rebate 97,825 97,825 PG&E Loan 248,790 248,790 Funding Source Totals 346,615 346,615 - - - - *Preliminary Engineering costs estimated to be 20% of total project cost. Assumed consultants will be used for design.

93 STREET LIGHTS & UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: LED Retrofit & High Voltage Conversion Project No.: 463005 Purpose: Replace city-owned streetlight fixtures with new Light Emitting Diode (LED) technology and convert high voltage series street light to stand voltage parallel street lights that promote energy conservation measures encourage by the state Energy Conservation Assistance Act.

Objectives The City has entered into a loan with California Energy Commission to finance this project to: • retrofit 5,047 City-owned streetlights with LED technology. • convert series circuit street light to standard parallel circuits. • to reduce City’s energy consumption by an estimated 2,112,291 kWh of electricity and save the City an estimated $268,789 annually in utility expenses. • reduce annual greenhouse gas emissions by 729 tons of CO2.

Business Priority: The City is committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and using less energy to reduce its energy costs. LED installation in City street lights accomplish this objective, and last 3-5 times longer than traditional street lights. An energy audit was conducted by San Mateo County Energy Watch in spring 2013 to identify opportunities for greater energy efficiency. At the April 2014 City Council meeting, staff proposed to have the LED street light conversion in two phases to effectively accomplish the citywide installation of 5,300 LED street lights. Phase 1 to be completed in July, 2014, was the PG&E turnkey conversion of approximately 900 cobra head street lights to LED. Phase 2 was authorization to apply for this low interest loan from the California Energy Commission.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary The total estimated project cost is $3,000,000 which will be funded by the Energy Commission’s Conditions: ECAA funded loan at one percent interest rate. Loan repayment will be offset by reduced energy costs in General Fund operating budgets.

Location: City-owned Streetlight Fixtures Project Manager: Gary Heap, Engineering Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 3,000,000 Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance 3,000,000 Additional CIP Request - Total Project 5-Yr CIP 3,000,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other - Annual Cashflow Totals ------

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 CEC Loan - CIP Funding Totals ------

94 STORM DRAINAGE & FLOOD CONTROL Capital Project Charters – 2015-2010 CIP

Overview A total of $2.77 million is planned in the storm drainage and flood control category in the next five years as shown in Table 3-4. The majority of these allocations are necessary for repayment of bond debt incurred for construction of the Bayfront Levee Improvement South of San Mateo Creek project which was completed in 2011 and removed or precluded 8,000 properties from the special hazard flood area. The 5 year allocation of $2.72 million, in increments of $545,000 each year, is funded by district property tax special assessments pledge for repayment of bonded debt.

The General Fund in 2015-16 provides funding of $45,250 to complete the repair of the Ryder Park levee. The repairs were identified through routine periodic inspection of the levee system and design of the project was initiated in 2014. During the winter of 2014, heavy rains caused additional erosion of this segment of levee which, if not repaired, could jeopardize the adjacent bike path and pedestrian bridge. Construction of this project is scheduled for summer 2015.

Table 3-4 Storm Drainage & Flood Control Proposed CIP Project Costs & Funding Sources Storm Drainage & Flood Control Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Bayfront Levee Improvement So of SM Creek 2,725,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 Ryder Park Levee Repair 45,250 45,250 Storm Drainage & Flood Control 5-Year CIP Total 2,770,250 590,250 545,000 545,000 545,000 545,000

Storm Drainage & Flood Control Funding Sources 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Bayfront Levee Assessment 2,725,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 General Fund 45,250 45,250 Storm Drainage & Flood Control 5-Year CIP Total 2,770,250 590,250 545,000 545,000 545,000 545,000

Additional Community Flood Control Needs Funding for storm drainage and flood control is very limited while the capital repair and replacement needs continue to rise. In the Capital Needs Assessment section of this report are details of the City’s storm drainage and flood control needs that do not have a funding source.

On October 16, 2012, FEMA issued a Physical Map Revision (PMR) which removed approximately 8,000 homes in neighborhoods south of San Mateo Creek from the Special Flood Hazard Area. Unfortunately, approximately 1200 properties, located in the areas north of San Mateo Creek, including the North Shoreview and a portion of the North Central neighborhoods, remained in the flood zone. The cost of projects to protect these properties is estimated at approximately $23.5 million. Identifying funding resources for the North Bayfront levee improvement project of $7.5 million and the Popular Avenue & Coyote Point pump stations of $16.0 million will address the needs of the residents in these neighborhoods.

Funding for stormwater and flood control system operation and maintenance is very limited while the capital repair and replacement needs have been estimated to be approximately $85 million. San Mateo’s storm drainage system is separate and distinct from the sewer system (although both are impacted during wet weather). Because the systems are separate, sewer revenues may not be used to fund storm and flood control infrastructure improvements. In addition, imposition of a fee for storm drainage/flood control purposes is prohibited by Proposition 218 without a majority vote of property owners. As a result, there is currently no funding source for storm drainage and flood control infrastructure other than general government tax dollars. Without a dedicated funding source, the City’s flood control and storm drainage infrastructure will continue to deteriorate.

95 STORM DRAINAGE & FLOOD CONTROL Capital Project Charters – 2015-2010 CIP

Project Name: Bayfront Levee Improvement South of San Mateo Creek Project No.: 468301 Purpose: Construct levee improvements at four locations to allow the levee system south of San Mateo Creek to be accredited per FEMA standards.

Objectives: Construct levee improvements to allow accreditation of levee system. Complete all environmental mitigation work required by project permit. Administer the assessment district activities and comply with bond covenants.

Business Priority: This project provides protection from tidal flooding during 100 year storm events and supports the City’s goal to remove properties from the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary Levee improvements were completed in 2011. Post-construction monitoring of environmental Conditions: mitigation site (wetlands restoration) will continue through FY 2016-17. The administration of the district including assessment fee collection activities, payment of debt service and required reporting are reflected in this project.

Location: South of San Mateo Creek at Bayfront Levee Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Kathleen VonAchen, Deputy Finance Director Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 9,113,213 Expended & Encumbered (7,427,865) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 1,685,348 Additional CIP Request 2,725,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 4,410,348

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other - Debt Service & Dist Admin 2,725,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 2,725,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 545,000

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Bayfront Levee Assessment 2,725,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 CIP Funding Totals 2,725,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 545,000 545,000

96 STORM DRAINAGE & FLOOD CONTROL Capital Project Charters – 2015-2010 CIP

Project Name: Ryder Park Levee Repair Project No.: 468006 Purpose: Repair a 50’ section of levee in Ryder Park where scour has occurred. Maintain levee in a state of good repair.

Objectives: Repair a section of eroded levee in Ryder Park at the mouth of San Mateo Creek including placement of rock revetment or other stabilization technique. The erosion was identified during routine levee inspections and could potentially impact the existing bike trail.

Business Priority: Maintaining levees in a state of good repair is necessary to maintain accreditation of levees and provide protection from tidal flooding.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary Environmental permits are required for this project and work may be restricted to periods of low Conditions: tide. Maintain continuity of pedestrian and bike access through park via detour route during construction. Project is funded and construction is scheduled to begin in FY 2014-15. Additional funding is needed to provide bid support and engineering services during construction and cover permit fees. The amount of additional funding required may increase as the condition of the levee continues to worsen with the onset of winter storms.

Location: Ryder Park at mouth of San Mateo Creek Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 160,000 Expended & Encumbered (46,295) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 113,705 Additional CIP Request 42,250 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 155,955

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - - Other 45,250 45,250 Annual Cashflow Totals 45,250 45,250 - - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 General Fund (interfund trsf) 42,250 42,250 CIP Funding Totals 42,250 42,250 - - - -

97

98 SAN MATEO CLEAN WATER PROGRAM (SEWER) – OVERVIEW Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Overview The sewer collection system and the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) have the City’s most significant infrastructure needs, and impact the quality of life of an estimated 160,000 citizens and customers in its service area. The table below outlines the sewer 5-year CIP categorized by the collection system and the treatment plant, totaling $340.6 million.

Table 3-5 Sewer Enterprise Five-Year CIP Costs by Service Delivery Category Clean Water Program (Sewer) Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Sewer-Collection System 101,952,654 35,239,800 36,932,854 5,700,000 12,185,000 11,895,000 Sewer-WWTP 238,638,775 32,905,000 126,699,206 10,002,806 56,734,518 12,297,245 Sewer System 5-Year CIP Total 340,591,429 68,144,800 163,632,060 15,702,806 68,919,518 24,192,245

Aging Sewer Infrastructure and Cease & Desist Order Similar to many sewer systems in the region, the City’s Sewer Enterprise facilities are aging and in need of significant rehabilitation. The collection system of the Sewer Enterprise dates back to the early 1900’s with the majority of sewer pipes installed in the 1940’s through 1960’s and the original structures at the WWTP constructed in 1937. Groundwater and storm water enter the City’s collection system through leaky pipes and illegal drain connections. During significant rain events the increased flow in the pipes exceeds the capacity of sewer facilities and results in overflows of diluted but untreated sewage into streets and storm drains which eventually reach creeks and the San Francisco Bay. These events are termed sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs).

Moreover, regulatory requirements for wastewater treatment are evolving and becoming more stringent to protect water quality in the San Francisco Bay. In 2009, the Regional Board issued a Cease and Desist Order (CDO) to the City of San Mateo mandating elimination of waste discharges and requiring specific actions be taken by the City and its sub-regional Partners, Hillsborough, Belmont, Crystal Springs County Sanitation District (CSCSD”) to correct conditions which cause SSOs. As a result of this and other regulatory issues, extensive capital improvements are necessary to bring the sewer facilities into a state of good repair, increase wet weather capacity, and meet current and future regulatory requirements.

San Mateo Clean Water Program The 20 year effort to implement these critical sewer infrastructure improvements has been branded “the Clean Water Program.” Chart 2 illustrates the current plan for Clean Water Program capital projects over the next 20 years developed to meet the mandates of the CDO. Of the total $875 million, the sub-regional partners and City of Foster City are estimated to contribute $140 million.

Since issuance of the CDO in 2009, Public Works staff members have taken various actions to implement these regulatory requirements through constructing infrastructure improvements, as well as conducting studies, evaluations and plans. Updates to these plans have been submitted to the Regional Board to maintain compliance with permits and regulatory orders. The City is currently in the process of validating the recent Draft Integrated Wastewater Master Plan from previous master plans for the collection system and the WWTP into a single integrated plan. Accordingly, the projects contained in the current capital improvement plan, their cost, timing and other factors are subject to further change upon the completion of the validation effort.

99 SAN MATEO CLEAN WATER PROGRAM (SEWER) – OVERVIEW Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Chart 3-1: San Mateo Clean Water Program, 20 Yr Plan

Sewer Enterprise Five-Year CIP Costs The Sewer CIP includes the first five years of the Clean Water Program’s 20-year capital plan.

Of the total $340.6 million recommended in sewer over the next five years, 19 capital projects costing $238.6 million (70%) are for the WWTP. The larger WWTP projects include: • $106.00 million new headworks and primary clarifiers replacement, • $ 43.15 million new flow equalization storage project, • $ 37.02 million program management, • $ 19.76 million secondary treatment capacity project,

Table 3-6 Wastewater Treatment Plant CIP Project Costs Sewer-WWTP Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Digester Gas to Compressed Natural Gas ------Electrical: Immediate Projects (WWTP) 300,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 - - Gravity Thickener 1 & 2 (WWTP) 3,009,000 2,809,000 200,000 - - - New Administration Building - Corp Yard/WWTP 4,997,608 - - - 4,997,608 - New Flow Equalization Storage Project (WWTP) 43,150,000 2,164,000 - - 40,986,000 - On-Site Stormwater Improvements Project 5,740,000 - - 865,000 - 4,875,000 Program Management – Clean Water Program 37,025,862 5,500,000 7,116,330 8,537,806 10,250,910 5,620,816 SEC System - SCs 1-4&RAS Pump Valve (WWTP) 4,440,000 4,240,000 200,000 - - - Secondary Treatment Capacity Project 19,760,000 3,000,000 16,760,000 - - - Stress Test WWTP Master Plan Environmental Document 200,000 200,000 - - - - WWTP Aeration Blower Replacement 1,301,429 - - - - 1,301,429 WWTP Annual Major Components 2,500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 WWTP Hopper, Cake Pump and Building Enclosure 2,772,876 - 2,772,876 - - - WWTP New Headworks & Primary Clarifiers Replacement 106,000,000 7,100,000 98,900,000 WWTP SCADA & Plant Control System (PCS) 3,100,000 3,100,000 - - - - Disinfection: Immed Proj: Hypochlorite Day /Bisulfite Tank 2,750,000 2,750,000 - - - - Solids Building Immed Projs – Boiler Replace (WWTP) 700,000 700,000 - - - - Solids Building Immed Proj - Centrifuge Hoist (WWTP) 742,000 742,000 - - - - Tank Drain Pump Replacement 150,000 - 150,000 - - - Sewer-WWTP 5-Year CIP Total 238,638,775 32,905,000 126,699,206 10,002,806 56,734,518 12,297,245

Sewer collection system project costs total $101.95 million amongst 15 different projects located throughout the City. The larger sewer collections projects include:

100 SAN MATEO CLEAN WATER PROGRAM (SEWER) – OVERVIEW Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

• $53.2 million South Trunk collection main upgrade, • $20.0 million citywide sewer rehabilitation, • $6.95 million Dale Avenue force main and pump station rehabilitation.

Table 3-7 Sewer Collection System CIP Project Costs Sewer-Collection System Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 41st/Pacific Pump Station – New Force Main (SST-13) 2,540,000 380,000 2,160,000 41st/Pacific Pump Station Upgrade (SST-17) 3,260,000 490,000 2,770,000 City Wide Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation 20,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 Closed Circuit TV Sewer Inspection 2,000,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 Collection System SCADA 1,158,120 1,158,120 - - - - Dale Ave NEW Wet Weather Force Main & Pump Station 230,000 230,000 - - - - Dale Avenue Relief (LPS-4) 1,515,000 - - - 250,000 1,265,000 Los Prados No. 1 Pump Station Upgrades 2,744,534 411,680 2,332,854 - - - Root Foaming 1,000,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Sanitary Sewer I / I Reduction 400,000 200,000 200,000 Sewer Pump Station Improvements 5,700,000 3,500,000 - 1,100,000 - 1,100,000 South Delaware/Bay Meadows Parallel (SST-3) 715,000 - - - 715,000 - South Trunk System Upgrade 53,200,000 23,200,000 30,000,000 - - - Dale Ave Existing Force Main & Pump Station Rehab 6,950,000 1,400,000 - - 5,550,000 - Inflow/Infiltrattion Reduction Study 540,000 540,000 - - - - Sewer-Collections 5-Year CIP Total 101,952,654 35,239,800 36,932,854 5,700,000 12,185,000 11,895,000

Sewer Enterprise Five-Year CIP Funding Sources A total of $340.6 million in Sewer funding is recommended, as summarized in Table 3-8.

Table 3-8 Sewer Enterprise CIP by Funding Sources Clean Water Program (Sewer) Funding Sources 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Crystal Spr Cnty SD/SM Cnty/Hillsborough 14,109,178 1,962,470 7,753,366 519,688 3,296,470 577,184 Foster City (Sewer) 41,295,009 5,357,790 23,729,281 1,410,582 9,230,714 1,566,642 Sewer (interfund trf) 7,496,500 2,442,500 1,155,000 1,044,000 1,885,000 970,000 Sewer Bonds 72,695,902 39,757,040 5,736,230 6,988,436 13,736,334 6,477,862 SWRCB Revolving Loan Fund 204,994,840 18,625,000 125,258,183 5,740,100 40,771,000 14,600,557 Sewer System 5-Year CIP Total 340,591,429 68,144,800 163,632,060 15,702,806 68,919,518 24,192,245

Of the total $340.6 million, 60% or $205 million is planned to be financed from the California Water Resources Control Board’s State Revolving Loan Fund Program. Subject to the Board’s approval of the loan, this financing mechanism provides the lowest interest cost ranging from 2% to 3.5%. A second funding source is the issuance of $72.7 million in sewer revenue bonds or related debt instruments, or 21% of the total. Future repayment of both the loans and bonds would be made through the pledge of sewer services revenues. Foster City’s share of WWTP capital improvements total $41.3 million and the sub-regional partners’ share, comprised of Hillsborough, Belmont, the Crystal Springs County Sanitation District (“CSCSD”) and certain unincorporated areas of the County of San Mateo, amount to $14.1 million.

There are 34 project charters provided in this section, as well as project charters discussing details of several current capital projects adopted by Council in previous years which are either ongoing or are expected to be completed within the next several years.

101

CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: 41st/Pacific Pump Station – New Force Main (SST-13) Project No.: 469985 Purpose: Provide capacity for wet weather flows to prevent sewer overflows.

Objectives: Install 3,600 ft. of new 12-inch force main to redirect discharge from El Camino Real Trunk Sewer to Delaware Street Trunk Sewer.

Business Priority: This project was identified in the 2005 and 2009 wet weather capacity assurance studies and is a necessary component of the wet weather capacity assurance program to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows in the collection system in accordance with the requirements of CDO R2-2009- 0020.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary Must be constructed at the same time as the 41st/Pacific Pump Station upgrade project. Final Conditions: construction completion extends to FY 2020-21 with a total project cost amounting to $2.5M.

Location: 3971 Pacific Blvd Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget Expended and Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Bal - Additional CIP Request 2,540,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 2,540,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 380,000 380,000 Construction 2,160,000 2,160,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 2,540,000 - - - 380,000 2,160,000

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) - Sew er Bonds - SWRCB Revolving Loan 2,540,000 380,000 2,160,000 CIP Funding Totals 2,540,000 - - - 380,000 2,160,000

103 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: 41st/Pacific Pump Station Upgrade (SST-17) Project No.: 469986 Purpose: Rehabilitate and construct improvements to the pump station to ensure capacity and reliability necessary to achieve certification in accordance with CDO R2-2009-0020 Provision III.

Objectives: This project includes expanding the pump station's firm capacity to meet peak wet weather flows. Ensure pump stations are in a state of good repair. Provide capacity for design peak wet weather flow. Ensure pump station is capable of continuous operation in the event of electrical or mechanical failure, or power outage.

Business Priority: This project was identified in the 2010 Citywide Sanitary Sewer Pump Station Study to ensure capacity and reliability and allow certification of the pump station in accordance with requirements of the CDO R2-2009-020. It is a necessary component of the wet weather capacity assurance program to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows in the collection system.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary Must be constructed at the same time as the 41st/Pacific force main project. Final construction Conditions: completion extends to FY 2021 with a total project cost amounting to $3.25M.

Location: 3971 Pacific Blvd Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget Expended and Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Bal - Additional CIP Request 3,260,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 3,260,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 490,000 490,000 Construction 2,770,000 2,770,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 3,260,000 - - - 490,000 2,770,000

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) - Sew er Bonds - SWRCB Revolving Loan 3,260,000 490,000 2,770,000 CIP Funding Totals 3,260,000 - - - 490,000 2,770,000

104 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: City Wide Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project No.: 469913 Purpose: Annual funding for collection system rehabilitation projects.

Objectives: Perform rehabilitation of sanitary sewer pipes, including spot repairs, segment repairs, full line rehabilitation or replacement, and manhole rehabilitation.

Business Priority: The annual rehabilitation project is identified in the City’s Sanitary Sewer Management Plan (SSMP) and collection system capital improvement program. The annual funding has been increased from $2M/year to $4M/year per recommendations in the 20-year Integrated Wastewater Master Plan (2014).

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary Annual projects in this rehab program are typically generated from the CCTV inspections and Conditions: condition assessments performed during the previous year. Each year approximately 20% of the sewer lines are inspected and rehabilitation needs in those basins are then prioritized and included in the next rehabilitation project. This project account is also used to fund miscellaneous repairs to sewer lines generated from other sources such as maintenance “hot spots” and public service requests.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 13,357,084 Expended and Encumbered (11,422,029) Prior Yrs Budget Bal 1,935,055 Additional CIP Request 20,000,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 21,935,055

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 3,200,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 Construction 16,800,000 4,000,000 3,200,000 3,200,000 3,200,000 3,200,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 20,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) - Sew er Bonds 4,000,000 4,000,000 SWRCB Revolving Loan 16,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 CIP Funding Totals 20,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000

105 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Closed Circuit TV Sewer Inspection Project No.: 469925 Purpose: Annual funding for the City's CCTV inspection program.

Objectives: Inspect all gravity sewer lines once every 5 years.

Business Priority: The annual CCTV Inspection is identified in the City’s Sanitary Sewer Management Plan (SSMP) and collection system capital improvement program.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary Inspection areas are identified by basin and performed on a rotating basis to cover Conditions: approximately 20% of all sewer lines in the City each year. This project also funds on-call CCTV inspection services to support investigation of field conditions on an as-needed.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 4,045,749 Expended & Encumbered (3,266,735) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 779,014 Additional CIP Request 2,000,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 2,779,014

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 2,000,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 2,000,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) 2,000,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 CIP Funding Totals 2,000,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000

106 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Collection System SCADA Project No.: 469916 Purpose: Upgrade of the SCADA system that serves the collection system.

Objectives: Upgrade the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system components in the collection system to be consistent with new equipment standards and control systems installed at the Wastewater Treatment Plant.

Business Priority: Upgrading the SCADA system is necessary to ensure reliable operation of the collection system facilities and prevent overflows. This project is identified in the 20-year Integrated Wastewater Master Plan (2014).

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary Identification of key parameters within which the project must operate, including policy, time Conditions: frames, agreements, regulations, budget, etc.

Location: 2050 Detroit Drive Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 501,880 Expended & Encumbered (107,426) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 394,454 Additional CIP Request 1,158,120 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 1,552,574

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 1,158,120 1,158,120 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 1,158,120 1,158,120 - - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) - Sew er Bonds 1,158,120 1,158,120 CIP Funding Totals 1,158,120 1,158,120 - - - -

107 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Dale Ave NEW Wet Weather Force Main and Pump Station Project No.: 469968 Purpose: Construction of a new Dale Avenue Pump Station and Force Main which pumps directly to the WWTP.

Objectives: To ensure adequate capacity and ongoing operability at the Dale Avenue pump station and force main.

Business Priority: Identified in the Integrated Master Plan as a project necessary to accommodate flow if the full conveyance option is selected.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary The 20 Year Integrated Wastewater Master Plan (2014) outlines two potential options to Conditions: accommodate flow: in-system storage or full conveyance. The need for this project will depend on which option is ultimately selected, which should become known at the completion of the environmental review process expected to conclude at some point during the 2015-2016 fiscal year. If the in-system storage option is selected, this project will not be necessary. If the full conveyance option is selected, new pump station and force main facilities will be needed at Dale Avenue in order to accommodate flow. A detailed scope of this project has not yet been determined, as it is not clear whether the project will be necessary. The funding request for 2015-2016 is intended to be a set-aside to launch any needed studies, scoping, or potentially to begin preliminary design, in the event that the full conveyance alternative is the selected option.

Location: Adjacent to 1400 Young Street Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional CIP Request 230,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 230,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 230,000 230,000 Construction - Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 230,000 230,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendations 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) - Crystal S/SM Cty/Hillsborough 16,100 16,100 Sew er Bonds 213,900 213,900 CIP Funding Totals 230,000 230,000 - - - -

108 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Dale Ave Existing Force Main and Pump Station Rehabilitation Project No.: 469942 Purpose: Rehabilitation of the existing Dale Avenue Pump Station and Force Main which pumps directly to the WWTP.

Objectives: To rehab the Dale Avenue pump station and force main to ensure ongoing operability.

Business Priority: Identified in the Integrated Master Plan as a rehabilitation project necessary to replaced aged facilities.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary None Conditions: Location: Adjacent to 1400 Young Street Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional CIP Request 6,950,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 6,950,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 1,050,000 700,000 350,000 Construction 5,900,000 350,000 5,550,000 Other - Annual Cashlow Totals 6,950,000 700,000 350,000 350,000 5,550,000 -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendations 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) - Crystal S/SM Cty/Hillsborough 486,500 98,000 388,500 Sew er Bonds 1,302,000 1,302,000 SWRCB Revolving Loan 5,161,500 5,161,500 CIP Funding Totals 6,950,000 1,400,000 - - 5,550,000 -

109 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Dale Avenue Relief (LPS-4) Project No.: 469950 Purpose: Construct relief sewer in Dale Avenue. Includes approximately 1,600 lf of 12” new and upsized pipe.

Objectives: Provide wet weather capacity to prevent sanitary sewer overflows.

Business Priority: This project was identified in the 2005 and 2009 wet weather capacity assurance studies and is a necessary component of the wet weather capacity assurance program to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows in the collection system in accordance with the requirements of CDO R2-2009-0020.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary Meet policy and procedure requirements established by the Clean Water Program Conditions: Management Office.

Location: Dale Avenue & Shoreview Avenue Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 155,000 Expended & Encumbered (10,133) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 144,867 Additional CIP Request 1,515,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 1,659,867

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 250,000 250,000 Construction 1,265,000 1,265,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 1,515,000 - - - 250,000 1,265,000

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) - Sew er Bonds 1,515,000 250,000 1,265,000 CIP Funding Totals 1,515,000 - - - 250,000 1,265,000

110 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Delaware Mainline Sewer Rehabilitation Project No.: 469987 Purpose: Rehabilitate the Delaware sanitary sewer trunk line to maintain and extend the service life of the existing pipe and reduce system I/I.

Objectives: Rehabilitate approximately 3,300 lf of existing reinforced concrete pipe sanitary sewer gravity line ranging in size from 24” to 33”. Project limits are on Delaware Street from south of 25th Avenue to north of Highway 92.

Business Priority: Project is identified in the integrated master plan as needed to rehabilitate/replace aged facilities.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary Night work may be required to construct the work during lower flow periods. Any traffic Conditions: impacts to CA-92 highway on-ramps at Delaware would require a Caltrans encroachment permit. Environmental permits may be required for the 19th Ave (Saratoga Ave.) drainage channel. This could impact environmental clearance and project schedule. Large bypass effort will be required. Condition of two existing siphons is unknown; further investigation needed to finalize scope of work.

Location: Delaware Street from South of 25th Ave to North of SR92 Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 4,030,000 Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance 4,030,000 Additional CIP Request - Total Project 5-Yr CIP 4,030,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - - Other - Annual Cashflow Totals ------

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendations 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) - Sew er Bonds - - CIP Funding Totals ------

111 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: El Cerrito Trunk Relief-Construction Phase Project No.: 469957 (also refer to 469934) Purpose: Construct a sanitary sewer relief line to convey flows from the City limit on El Cerrito Avenue to the intersection of Idaho St. and Sunnybrae Ave.

Objectives: Construct the portion of the Crystal Springs/El Cerrito Trunk Sewer Project located within City of San Mateo limits in accordance with 2009 Cease and Desist Order No. R2-2009- 0020. Provide capacity for peak wet weather flows to prevent Sanitary Sewer Overflows.

Business Priority: The El Cerrito Relief project is a requirement of the 2009 Cease and Desist Order (CDO) and a necessary component of the wet weather capacity assurance program to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows in the collection system.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary This Project Account is established to capture only Construction Phase costs. The parent project Conditions: account (#469934) captures all project costs prior to the Construction Phase. This is to assist with invoicing and cost tracking for Partner Agency cost sharing. Project connects to the Crystal Springs/El Cerrito Trunk Sewer Phase II project at the upstream boundary and the South Trunk Relief Phase I at the downstream boundary. The downstream connection may change as a result of changes to the South Trunk System Upgrade alternative design solutions. Project is subject to the cost sharing terms of Amendments 1, 2, and 3 to the Sanitary Sewerage Agreement between the City, Town of Hillsborough, Crystal Springs County Sanitation District, and San Mateo County. City’s share of the project cost is 6%. This project account also includes payment of City share of project costs for the Crystal Springs Phase II project. Project completion deadline is Sept. 2015 per 2009 CDO.

Location: El Cerrito Avenue @ City Limit to intersection of Idaho St & Sunnybrae Ave Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 11,764,136 Expended & Encumbered (1,210,884) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 10,553,252 Additional CIP Request - Total Project 5-Yr CIP 10,553,252

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other - Annual Cashflow Totals ------

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sewer (interfund trf) - Sewer Bonds - CIP Funding Totals ------

112 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: El Cerrito Trunk SS Relief (SNT 1&4) Project No.: 469934 (see also 469957) Purpose: Construct a sanitary sewer relief line to convey flows from the City limit on El Cerrito Avenue to the intersection of Idaho St. and Sunnybrae Ave.

Objectives: Construct the portion of the Crystal Springs/El Cerrito Trunk Sewer Project located within City of San Mateo limits in accordance with 2009 Cease and Desist Order No. R2-2009-0020. Provide capacity for peak wet weather flows to prevent Sanitary Sewer Overflows.

Business Priority: The El Cerrito Relief project is a requirement of the 2009 Cease and Desist Order (CDO) and a necessary component of the wet weather capacity assurance program to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows in the collection system.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary This is the original or parent Project Account. A Construction Phase only account (#469957) was Conditions: established to assist with invoicing and cost tracking for Partner Agency cost sharing. Project connects to the Crystal Springs/El Cerrito Trunk Sewer Phase II project at the upstream boundary and the South Trunk Relief Phase I at the downstream boundary. The downstream connection may change as a result of changes to the South Trunk System Upgrade alternative design solutions. Project is subject to the cost sharing terms of Amendments 1, 2, and 3 to the Sanitary Sewerage Agreement between the City, Town of Hillsborough, Crystal Springs County Sanitation District, and San Mateo County. Project completion deadline is Sept. 2015 per the 2009 CDO; however, we will be requesting that the Regional Water Quality Control Board grant an extension of that deadline to coincide with an extension that was granted to Hillsborough. The total project cost is estimated at $14.5M. The budget below represents the City of San Mateo’s share of the project costs, which is 6%.

Location: El Cerrito Avenue @ City Limit to intersection of Idaho St & Sunnybrae Ave Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 1,619,523 Expended & Encumbered (1,339,832) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 279,691 Additional CIP Request - Total Project 5-Yr CIP 279,691

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other - Annual Cashflow Totals ------

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sewer (interfund trf) - Sewer Bonds - CIP Funding Totals ------

113 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Kingridge Sewer Rehabilitation & Mitigation Project No.: 469922 Purpose: Rehabilitate the sewer line in Kingridge Canyon from 42nd Avenue to 36th Avenue

Objectives: Perform environmental mitigation tree planting and post- construction monitoring as required by project permits. Mitigation site is within Laurelwood Park.

Business Priority: Kingridge sewer rehabilitation project is included in CDO R2-2009-0020.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary All rehabilitation work is complete, and all mitigation planting will be completed in FY 14/15. Post- Conditions: construction monitoring of tree establishment will continue for 10 years as required by regulatory permits. Estimated funding needs for FY15/16 through FY25/26 is $150,000 which is covered by current project budget allocations, so no additional budget is needed.

Location: Kingridge Drive from 42nd to 36th Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 5,283,942 Expended & Encumbered (4,843,991) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 439,951 Additional CIP Request - Total Project 5-Yr CIP 439,951

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other - Annaul Cashflow Totals ------

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sewer (interfund trf) - Sewer Bonds - CIP Funding Totals ------

114 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Los Prados No. 1 Pump Station Upgrades Project No.: 469988 Purpose: Upgrade Los Prados #1 Pump Station to ensure capacity and reliability necessary to achieve certification in accordance with CDO R2-2009-0020 Provision III.

Objectives: Provide capacity for design peak wet weather flow. Ensure pump station is in a state of good repair. Ensure pump station is capable of continuous operation in the event of electrical or mechanical failure, or power outage.

Business Priority: This project was identified in the 2010 Citywide Sanitary Sewer Pump Station Study to ensure capacity and reliability and allow certification of the pump station in accordance with requirements of the CDO R2-2009-020. It is a necessary component of the wet weather capacity assurance program to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows in the collection system.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary Pump station operational outages may be required. Night work may be required for certain Conditions: construction activities to be performed during lower flow periods. The project is near but not immediately adjacent to residences. Project should be constructed during summer months; construction during wet weather season should be avoided.

Location: 3000 Los Prados Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional CIP Request 2,744,534 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 2,744,534

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 411,680 411,680 Construction 2,332,854 2,332,854 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 2,744,534 411,680 2,332,854 - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) - Sew er Bonds 411,680 411,680 SWRCB Revolving Loan 2,332,854 2,332,854 CIP Funding Totals 2,744,534 411,680 2,332,854 - - -

115 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Inflow/Infiltration Reduction Study – Citywide Lateral Replacement Study; Sewer Basin Focused Rehab; High Salinity Investigation near Marina Lagoon Project No.: 469989 Purpose: This study includes investigation of several issues related to reduction of inflow and infiltration in the sanitary sewer collection system.

Objectives: Perform studies to investigate causes and evaluate potential solutions for the following issues: - Evaluate potential effectiveness of replacing sewer laterals system-wide. - Perform flow monitoring and evaluate I/I reduction potential of focused rehabilitation work in C basins (east of highway 101). - Investigate recurring high salinity in C basins/ Los Prados area of the collection system. - Investigate recurring sewer odor issues in Shoreview area of collection system.

Business Priority: Reduction of I/I in sewers helps alleviate conditions which cause overflows. This study is intended to investigate inter-related issues occurring in the C basins (area east of highway 101, south of 3rd Avenue, and west of Marina Lagoon) and to evaluate solutions which would be used to determine scope and cost of future projects.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary None Conditions: Location: City-wide Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional CIP Request 540,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 540,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 108,000 108,000 Construction 432,000 432,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 540,000 540,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) 540,000 540,000 CIP Funding Totals 540,000 540,000 - - - -

116 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Root Foaming Project No.: 469933 Purpose: Annual funding for the City's root foaming program.

Objectives: Perform root foaming in sewer lines in basins with historic root intrusion.

Business Priority: The annual root foaming project is identified in the City’s Sanitary Sewer Management Plan (SSMP) and collection system capital improvement program.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary Root foaming is performed in one of the identified three areas impacted by roots every year Conditions: (approx. 275,000 L.F. each) on a rotating basis.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 1,647,924 Expended & Encumbered (1,323,483) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 324,441 Additional CIP Request 1,000,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 1,324,441

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 1,000,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 1,000,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) 1,000,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 CIP Funding Totals 1,000,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000

117 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Sanitary Sewer I / I Reduction Project No.: 467833 Purpose: Perform Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring and Hydraulic Modeling on a periodic basis.

Objectives: Perform flow monitoring in the sanitary sewer collection system with temporary and permanent flow meters. Periodically update and calibrate the City’s sanitary sewer collection system hydraulic model to reflect new infrastructure; Utilize the model to predict flows under various conditions, determine sub-basins with the largest amount of Inflow and Infiltration (I/I), and analyze proposed design solutions.

Business Priority: Needed to provide flow data in response to CDO R2-2009-0020, predict flows in system under various conditions, analyze impact of changes on the system, and evaluate effectiveness of potential design solutions.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary This work has historically been performed by consultant services obtained through a RFP Conditions: process. In the future this function may be performed by the consultant Program Management Team for the Clean Water Program.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 2,183,600 Expended & Encumbered (1,960,913) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 222,687 Additional CIP Request 400,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 622,687

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 400,000 200,000 200,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 400,000 200,000 - - 200,000 -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) 400,000 200,000 200,000 CIP Funding Totals 400,000 200,000 - - 200,000 -

118 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Sewer Pump Station Improvements Project No.: 469450 Purpose: Rehabilitate and construct improvements to sanitary sewer pump stations to ensure capacity and reliability necessary to achieve certification in accordance with CDO R2-2009-0020 Provision III.

Objectives: Ensure pump stations are in a state of good repair. Provide capacity for design peak wet weather flow. Ensure pump station is capable of continuous operation in the event of electrical or mechanical failure, or power outage.

Business Priority: Periodic rehabilitation and upgrades are necessary to keep pump stations in a state of good repair to provide desired level of service. Certification of sanitary sewer pump stations for capacity and reliability is a requirement of CDO R2-2009-0020.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary This project includes on-going funding (typically on a biennial basis) to fund pump station capital Conditions: improvement projects; Proposed work in FY14/15 and 15/16 includes a Force Main and Pump Station Condition Assessment and Evaluation. The scope and sequence of individual pump station projects may be modified based on the 2010 Citywide Sanitary Sewer Pump Station Study and the results of the condition assessment.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 3,040,839 Expended & Encumbered (2,374,995) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 665,844 Additional CIP Request 5,700,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 6,365,844

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 5,700,000 3,500,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 5,700,000 3,500,000 - 1,100,000 - 1,100,000

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) - Sew er Bonds 3,500,000 3,500,000 SWRCB Revolving Loan 2,200,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 CIP Funding Totals 5,700,000 3,500,000 - 1,100,000 - 1,100,000

119 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: South Delaware/Bay Meadows Parallel (SST-3) Project No.: 469972 Purpose: Construct a parallel sanitary sewer relief pipe in Delaware St. from McClellan St. to E. 25th Avenue.

Objectives: Provide capacity for peak wet weather flows to prevent Sanitary Sewer Overflows.

Business Priority: This project was identified in the 2005 and 2009 wet weather capacity assurance studies and is a necessary component of the wet weather capacity assurance program to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows in the collection system in accordance with the requirements of CDO R2-2009-0020.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary The limits of this relief sewer will be coordinated with other upstream and downstream Conditions: projects in the wet weather capacity assurance program. Space for this proposed project has been reserved in the re-aligned Delaware Street within the Bay Meadows development area. This project is scheduled to commence construction beginning in Fiscal Year 2020/2021, with construction costs estimated at $4.035M, for a total escalated project cost estimated at $4.75M.

Location: Delaware from McClellan to E. 25th Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional CIP Request 715,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 715,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Future 15 Yrs Preliminary Engineering 715,000 475,000 240,000 Construction - 4,035,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 715,000 - - - 475,000 240,000 4,035,000

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Future 15 Yrs Sew er (interfund trf) 715,000 715,000 SWRCB Revolving Loan 4,035,000 CIP Funding Totals 715,000 - - - 715,000 - 4,035,000

120 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: South Trunk System Upgrade Project No.: 469911 Purpose: Construct a wet weather only sewer relief line and/or sewage storage basin in the South Trunk service area.

Objectives: Provide capacity for peak wet weather flows from the South Trunk service area to prevent Sanitary Sewer Overflows. Provide capacity in a manner that minimizes impacts to the conveyance system in the interim condition prior to full build out of the wet weather capacity assurance program, and optimizes operational flexibility for management of flows in the South Trunk service area.

Business Priority: This project was identified in the 2005 and 2009 wet weather capacity assurance studies and is a necessary component of the wet weather capacity assurance program to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows in the collection system. The project is included in CDO R2-2009-0020.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary The scope of this project is significantly different in the Full Conveyance alternative versus the In- Conditions: System Storage alternative outlined in the 20 Year Integrated Wastewater Master Plan (2014). The scope included in the Full Conveyance alternative consists of a large wet weather only relief sewer, potentially constructed in two phases. It would be located in Delaware Street from E. 25th Avenue to Sunnybrae Avenue, along Sunnybrae to S. Amphlett Blvd., and across Route 101 into the Dale Avenue Pump Station corridor. The scope included in the In-System Storage alternative consists of a 4.2 million gallon sewage storage basin in Bay Meadows Park. Depending on the size of the storage basin, the relief sewer would be downsized or eliminated. The project budget shown below is based on the full conveyance alternative. The South Trunk Phase I construction contract awarded in 2014 has been terminated, and the project is on-hold until the Master Plan alternative is selected through the program level CEQA process. Costs for termination are expected to be incurred during the 14/15 fiscal year. Additional work will be needed in 14/15 and 15/16 to support evaluation of the design alternatives for the entire South Trunk System Upgrade. The State Revolving Fund (SRF) Loan approval received for the original South Trunk Relief Phase I and II will need to be revised to reflect the new scope once determined. The dates for implementation and completion of the South Trunk shown in the 2009 CDO will be re-negotiated with the Regional Water Board as part of the Integrated Wastewater Master Plan implementation process.

Location: Sunnybrae Blvd extending down Delaware Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

121 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 13,521,621 Expended & Encumbered (3,574,097) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 9,947,524 Additional CIP Request 53,200,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 63,147,524

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 53,200,000 23,200,000 30,000,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 53,200,000 23,200,000 30,000,000 - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) - - US 101 Sew er Impact Fees - South Trunk Relief Impact Fee - Sew er Bonds 4,575,000 4,575,000 SWRCB Revolving Loan 48,625,000 18,625,000 30,000,000 CIP Funding Totals 53,200,000 23,200,000 30,000,000 - - -

122 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Digester Gas to Compressed Natural Gas Project No.: 469967 Purpose: To sustainably and cost effectively produce low carbon vehicle fuel from unused digester gas generated at the WWTP.

Objectives: This project includes installation of equipment to convert digester gas to compressed natural gas (CNG).

Business Priority: This project aligns with the City’s sustainability goals and will be a replicable approach to recover energy from digester gas.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary It is assumed project will adhere to established procurement policies. This project is partially Conditions: funded by a grant from the California Energy Commission and must be completed within timeframes established in the grant funding agreement.

Location: 2050 Detroit Drive Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 4,950,000 Expended & Encumbered (2,305,211) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 2,644,789 Additional CIP Request - Total Project 5-Yr CIP 2,644,789

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 2,644,789 2,644,789 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 2,644,789 2,644,789 - - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 State CEC Grant Reimb. - Foster City (Sew er) (475,000) (475,000) Crystal S/SM Cty/Hillsborough (175,000) (175,000) Sew er Bonds 650,000 650,000 CIP Funding Totals ------

123 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Disinfection: Immediate Projects: Hypochlorite Day Tank/Bisulfite Storage Tank Replacement (WWTP) Project No.: 469974 Purpose: Replace hypo day tanks and bisulfite storage tanks and related piping to prevent leaks. Implement features of chlor/dechlor failure analysis to reduce/eliminate chlorine/disinfection violations. Upgrade electrical and controls to meet codes and replace controls in coordination with PCS project.

Objectives: Replace hypo day tanks and old/deteriorated/ inaccessible piping, establishment of containment area for day tanks. Incorporate features to eliminate disinfection violations; Replace bisulfite storage tanks and deteriorated piping, add a fourth bisulfite pump to add failover backup, incorporate features to eliminate chlorine violations; Upgrade electrical power equipment to current codes and provide redundant power to controls and pumps; and Coordinate controls upgrade with new PCS Upgrade Project.

Business Priority: This project is identified in the Master Plan as an immediate reliability need.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary The hypo metering (feed) system to the Contact Tanks must remain in service during the entire Conditions: process.

Location: 2050 Detroit Drive Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 290,000 Expended & Encumbered (360,856) Prior Yrs Budget Balance (70,856) Additional CIP Request 2,750,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 2,679,144

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 2,750,000 2,750,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 2,750,000 2,750,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Foster City (Sew er) 522,500 522,500 Crystal S/SM Cty/Hillsborough 192,500 192,500 Sew er Bonds 2,035,000 2,035,000 CIP Funding Totals 2,750,000 2,750,000 - - - -

124 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Electrical: Immediate Projects (WWTP) Project No.: 469979 Purpose: This immediate improvement project is a short-term project that is needed to maintain compliance and provide a safe working environment until the recommended CIP projects are brought on- line.

Objectives: The project includes rebuilding generators, installing connections to each transfer switch for a generator and the procurement of a portable (towable) 400kw generator.

Business Priority: This project is identified in the Master Plan as necessary for immediate reliability.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary It is assumed project will adhere to established procurement policies. Conditions: Location: 2050 Detroit Drive Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 140,000 Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance 140,000 Additional CIP Request 300,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 440,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 300,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 300,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) 222,000 74,000 74,000 74,000 Foster City (Sew er) 57,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 Crystal S/SM Cty/Hillsborough 21,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 CIP Funding Totals 300,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 - -

125 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Gravity Thickener 1 & 2 (WWTP) Project No.: 469975 Purpose: Rehabilitate and repair various elements within gravity thickener and recoat interior surfaces. Evaluate the sludge drawoff pipe and explore options for repair/replacement. Evaluate the need to replace primary sludge pumps in the basement of the Solids Handling Building.

Objectives: To maintain the existing thickener to perform normal plant operations.

Business Priority: This project is identified in the Master Plan as necessary in order to maintain normal plant operations.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary Each Gravity Thickener will be down for 60 consecutive days to perform construction. Gravity Conditions: Thickener 2 to be taken out of service to be cleaned, inspected and serviced immediately prior to project construction initiation.

Location: 2050 Detroit Drive Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 1,175,000 Expended & Encumbered (277,827) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 897,173 Additional CIP Request 3,009,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 3,906,173

Project Cost Cashflow 5-CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 3,009,000 2,809,000 200,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 3,009,000 2,809,000 200,000 - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) - Foster City (Sew er) 571,710 533,710 38,000 Crystal S/SM Cty/Hillsborough 210,630 196,630 14,000 Sew er Bonds 2,078,660 2,078,660 SWRCB Revolving Loan 148,000 148,000 CIP Funding Totals 3,009,000 2,809,000 200,000 - - -

126 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: New Administration Building - Corp Yard/WWTP Project No.: 461005 Purpose: This project includes the construction of a new administration building and laboratory.

Objectives: To provide adequately sized facilities necessary to carry out administrative services for the Corporation Yard and WWTP, and laboratory functions.

Business Priority: This project is identified in the corporation yard and WWTP Master plans as a replacement project necessary to maintain basic WWTP operations. Final construction completion extends to FY 2024 with a total project cost amounting to $72.4M.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary WWTP and Sewer Collections functions account for approximately 46% of the $72M project Conditions: costs (per the space allocation included in Corp Yard Master Plan: WWTP costs are 34% of total (and Foster City pays 19% of that 34%); and Collections are 12% of total (and Minor Partners pay 6% of that 12%). The cash flow and funding summaries below are only meant to convey the portion of the project costs that the sewer fund will be responsible for.

Location: 2050 Detroit Drive Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 702,000 Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance 702,000 Additional CIP Request 4,997,608 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 5,699,608

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Future 15 Yrs Preliminary Engineering 4,997,608 2,332,217 2,665,391 Construction - 28,319,779 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 4,997,608 - - - 2,332,217 2,665,391 28,319,779

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Future 15 Yrs Foster City (Sew er) 322,845 322,845 1,829,458 Crystal S/SM Cty/Hillsborough 35,983 35,983 203,902 Unfunded Need - Sew er Bonds 4,638,780 4,638,780 26,286,419 CIP Funding Totals 4,997,608 - - - 4,997,608 - 28,319,779

127 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: New Flow Equalization Storage Project (WWTP) Project No.: 469965 Purpose: This project is driven by the projected increase in peak wet weather flow (PWWF) to the WWTP. The current PWWF capacity of the WWTP is 60 million gallons per day (mgd), while the projected PWWF is anticipated to be 88 mgd by the year 2020. The WWTP does not have the space needed to expand the secondary and tertiary treatment facilities to 88 mgd, so flow equalization will be required to accommodate these peaks.

Objectives: Construction of new flow equalization storage, pumping, and odor control facilities to store primary effluent during wet weather events.

Business Priority: This project is necessary to accommodate projected PWWF increases.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary Construction sequencing will need to be closely coordinated with the other future facilities that Conditions: are planned for the Corporation Yard. Completion of construction extends to FY 2023 with a total estimated project cost amounting to $43.5M.

Locations: 2050 Detroit Drive Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 300,000 Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance 300,000 Additional CIP Request 43,150,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 43,450,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Future 15 Yrs Preliminary Engineering 2,164,000 2,164,000 Construction 22,018,000 3,050,000 18,968,000 18,968,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 24,182,000 2,164,000 - - 3,050,000 18,968,000 18,968,000

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Future 15 Yrs Sew er (interfund trf) - Foster City (Sew er) 7,787,340 7,787,340 Crystal S/SM Cty/Hillsborough 2,459,160 2,459,160 Sew er Bonds 2,164,000 2,164,000 SWRCB Revolving Loan 30,739,500 30,739,500 CIP Funding Totals 43,150,000 2,164,000 - - 40,986,000 - -

128 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: On-Site Stormwater Improvements Project Project No.: 469959 Purpose: To capture stormwater generated on the WWTP site for treatment prior to discharge.

Objectives: This project includes the construction of new stormwater collection piping and a new stormwater pump station for pumping to the headworks or flow equalization basin.

Business Priority: Necessary for WWTP to comply with stormwater discharge regulations.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary None. Conditions: Location: 2050 Detroit Drive Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional CIP Request 5,740,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 5,740,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 865,000 575,000 290,000 Construction 4,875,000 4,875,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 5,740,000 - - 575,000 290,000 4,875,000

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) - Foster City (Sew er) 1,090,600 164,350 926,250 Crystal S/SM Cty/Hillsborough 401,800 60,550 341,250 SWRCB Revolving Loan 4,247,600 640,100 3,607,500 CIP Funding Totals 5,740,000 - - 865,000 - 4,875,000

129 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Primary Clarifier #4 Rehabilitation (WWTP) Project No.: 469982 Purpose: To maintain the existing clarifier to perform normal plant operations.

Objectives: Rehabilitate and repair various elements within primary clarifier #4 and recoat interior surfaces.

Business Priority: This project has been identified in the Master Plan as an immediate need project.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary Design of this project has been completed and was funded by Project #469949. Construction Conditions: was awarded and has commenced in FY14-15. Clarifier will be down for 60 consecutive days between May 2015 and August 2015.

Location: 2050 Detroit Drive Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 1,100,000 Expended & Encumbered (608,000) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 492,000 Additional CIP Request - Total Project 5-Yr CIP 492,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - - Other - Annual Cashflow Totals ------

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) - Foster City (Sew er) - - Crystal S/SM Cty/Hillsborough - - Sew er Bonds - - CIP Funding Totals ------

130 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Program Management: Clean Water Program Project No.: 469981 Purpose: To successfully deliver San Mateo’s Clean Water Program.

Objectives: To incorporate the City’s vision and deliver the Program within established budgets, schedules, and quality standards.

Business Priority: This project is necessary to ensure delivery of Sanitary Sewer Collection and Wastewater Treatment Capital Projects in order to address reliability needs and regulatory requirements.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary None. Costs to deliver the Clean Water Program will extend through Fiscal Year 2035, with total Conditions: Program Management costs estimated at $120M.

Location: 330 W. 20th Avenue Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 5,464,000 Expended & Encumbered (5,008,762) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 455,238 Additional CIP Request 37,025,862 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 37,481,100

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Future 15 Yrs Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other 37,025,862 5,500,000 7,116,330 8,537,806 10,250,910 5,620,816 79,004,138 Annual Cashflow Totals 37,025,862 5,500,000 7,116,330 8,537,806 10,250,910 5,620,816 79,004,138

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Future 15 Yrs Sew er (interfund trf) 500,000 500,000 Foster City (Sew er) 4,509,416 1,045,000 1,008,535 1,132,232 1,025,529 298,120 15,010,786 Crystal S/SM Cty/Hillsb 1,606,364 330,000 371,565 417,138 377,827 109,834 4,740,248 Sew er Bonds 30,410,082 3,625,000 5,736,230 6,988,436 8,847,554 5,212,862 59,253,104 CIP Funding Totals 37,025,862 5,500,000 7,116,330 8,537,806 10,250,910 5,620,816 79,004,138

131 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: SEC System Immediate Project - SCs 1- 4&RAS Pump Valve (WWTP) Project No.: 469973 Purpose: To rehabilitate and repair various elements within the clarifiers and recoat interior surfaces, to maintain compliance and provide a safe working environment until other recommended CIP projects are brought on-line.

Objectives: This project includes rehabilitation of Secondary Clarifiers 1 through 4, including replacement of the clarifier mechanisms and center columns, RAS pumps, secondary scum pumps and discharge valves.

Business Priority: Identified in the Master Plan as necessary to maintain compliance and provide a safe working environment.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary All secondary clarifiers are required during wet weather flows and only one may be taken out of Conditions: service at a time during the dry season. Annual maintenance on the other clarifiers will need to be scheduled around this construction.

Location: 2050 Detroit Drive Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 2,320,000 Expended & Encumbered (284,602) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 2,035,398 Additional CIP Request 4,440,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 6,475,398

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 4,440,000 1,000,000 3,240,000 200,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 4,440,000 1,000,000 3,240,000 200,000 - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) - Foster City (Sew er) 843,600 805,600 38,000 Crystal S/SM Cty/Hillsborough 310,800 296,800 14,000 Sew er Bonds 3,137,600 3,137,600 SWRCB Revolving Loan 148,000 148,000 CIP Funding Totals 4,440,000 4,240,000 200,000 - - -

132 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Secondary Treatment Capacity Project Project No.: 469958 Purpose: To increase the secondary treatment capacity from 40 million gallons per day (mgd) to 60 mgd.

Objectives: This project includes modifying the geometry of the existing aeration basins to improve sludge settleability and to increase wet weather capacity by creating unaerated selector zones. This project also includes the construction of a new 110-foot secondary clarifier.

Business Priority: This project is necessary to meet the NPDES permit requirement to eliminate blending of primary effluent with secondary effluent.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary The aeration basins will need to be taken out of service one at a time for this project, so Conditions: construction should take place during low flows.

Location: 2050 Detroit Drive Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional CIP Request 19,760,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 19,760,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 3,000,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 Construction 16,760,000 8,900,000 7,860,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 19,760,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 8,900,000 7,860,000 -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) - Foster City (Sew er) 3,754,400 570,000 3,184,400 Crystal S/SM Cty/Hillsborough 1,383,200 210,000 1,173,200 Sew er Bonds 2,220,000 2,220,000 SWRCB Revolving Loan 12,402,400 12,402,400 CIP Funding Totals 19,760,000 3,000,000 16,760,000 - - -

133 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Short-Term Motor-Control-Cabinet Replacement Project No.: 469962 Purpose: To replace equipment that is at the end of its useful life.

Objectives: This project includes replacement of the Motor Control Cabinets (MCCs) located in the WWTP Civilization Building as well as the MCC unit located adjacent to the filters.

Business Priority: This is an equipment replacement project necessary to maintain basic WWTP operations.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary Primary Clarifiers 1, 2 and 3, and their associated sludge and scum pumps must be kept Conditions: operational.

Location: 2050 Detroit Drive Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 1,000,000 Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance 1,000,000 Additional CIP Request - Total Project 5-Yr CIP 1,000,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - - Construction - - Other - Annual Cashflow Totals ------

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) - Foster City (Sew er) - - Crystal S/SM Cty/Hillsborough - - Sew er Bonds - - CIP Funding Totals ------

134 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Solids Building Immediate Projects – Boiler Replacement (WWTP) Project No.: 469976 Purpose: This immediate improvement project is a short-term project that is needed to maintain compliance and provide a safe working environment at the WWTP until the recommended CIP projects are brought on-line.

Objectives: The project includes replacing the hot water boiler; removing the unused cogeneration system.

Business Priority: This project is identified in the Master Plan as necessary for immediate reliability.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary None. Conditions: Location: 2050 Detroit Drive Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 80,000 Expended & Encumbered (71,576) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 8,425 Additional CIP Request 700,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 708,425

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 140,000 140,000 Construction 560,000 560,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 700,000 700,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Foster City (Sew er) 133,000 133,000 Crystal S/SM Cty/Hillsborough 49,000 49,000 Sew er Bonds 518,000 518,000 CIP Funding Totals 700,000 700,000 - - - -

135 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Solids Building Immediate Projects Centrifuge Hoist (WWTP) Project No.: 469978 Purpose: To correct the misalignment in order to perform maintenance to reduce the risk of damage to equipment and personnel.

Objectives: This project includes installation of a new bridge crane in the centrifuge area of the solids handling building and modification of the anchorage of the maintenance monorail.

Business Priority: This is an immediate plant reliability project needed to maintain compliance and provide a safe working environment.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary None. Conditions: Location: 2050 Detroit Drive Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 218,000 Expended & Encumbered (2,410) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 215,590 Additional CIP Request 742,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 957,590

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 742,000 742,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 742,000 742,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Foster City (Sew er) 140,980 140,980 Crystal S/SM Cty/Hillsborough 51,940 51,940 Sew er Bonds 549,080 549,080 CIP Funding totals 742,000 742,000 - - - -

136 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Stress Test WWTP Master Plan Environmental Document Project No.: 469938 Purpose: To prepare an integrated sanitary sewer collection and wastewater treatment master plan.

Objectives: To identify projects needed to respond to regulatory requirements and infrastructure needs, and to identify associated costs. It is anticipated the majority of the work will be completed in 2014/15.

Business Priority: Project involves preparation of a master plan.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary None Conditions: Location: 2050 Detroit Drive Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 1,873,675 Expended & Encumbered (1,854,173) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 19,502 Additional CIP Request 200,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 219,502

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other 200,000 200,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 200,000 200,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) 158,500 158,500 Foster City (Sew er) 30,000 30,000 Crystal S/SM Cty/Hillsborough 11,500 11,500 CIP Funding Totals 200,000 200,000 - - - -

137 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Tank Drain Pump Replacement Project No.: 469963 Purpose: To replace equipment that is at the end of its useful life.

Objectives: This project includes replacement of the eight tank drain pumps at the WWTP with two new tank drain pumps.

Business Priority: This is an equipment replacement project necessary to maintain basic WWTP operations.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary None Conditions: Location: 2050 Detroit Drive Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional CIP Request 150,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 150,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 30,000 30,000 Construction 120,000 120,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 150,000 - 150,000 - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) 111,000 111,000 Foster City (Sew er) 28,500 28,500 Crystal S/SM Cty/Hillsborough 10,500 10,500 CIP Funding Totals 150,000 - 150,000 - - -

138 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: WWTP Aeration Blower Replacement Project No.: 469990 Purpose: To replace equipment that is at the end of its useful life.

Objectives: This project includes replacement of the aeration blowers. One blower will be replaced annually.

Business Priority: This is an equipment replacement project necessary to maintain basic WWTP operations.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary None. Final construction completion extends to FY 2026 with a total project cost estimated at Conditions: $9.1M.

Location: 2050 Detroit Drive Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional CIP Request 1,301,429 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 1,301,429

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Future 15 Yrs Preliminary Engineering 1,301,429 1,301,429 Construction - 7,798,571 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 1,301,429 - - - - 1,301,429 7,798,571

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Future 15 Yrs Foster City (Sew er) 247,272 247,272 1,481,728 Crystal S/SM Cty/Hillsborough 91,100 91,100 467,914 SWRCB Revolving Loan 963,057 963,057 5,848,928 CIP Funding Totals 1,301,429 - - - - 1,301,429 7,798,571

139 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: WWTP Annual Major Components Project No.: 469949 Purpose: To provide a funding source for life cycle rehabilitation and as well as unexpected repair expenses.

Objectives: This project involves funding for continuous life-cycle rehabilitation projects for each component of the plant.

Business Priority: This project is necessary to address unanticipated issues and maintain basic WWTP operations.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary None. Conditions: Location: 2050 Detroit Drive Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 5,523,700 Expended & Encumbered (3,737,143) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 1,786,557 Additional CIP Request 2,500,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 4,286,557

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 2,500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 2,500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) 1,850,000 370,000 370,000 370,000 370,000 370,000 Foster City (Sew er) 475,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 Crystal S/SM Cty/Hillsborough 175,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 CIP Funding Totals 2,500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000

140 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: WWTP Hopper, Cake Pump and Building Enclosure Project No.: 469939 Purpose: To provide additional capacity and redundancy to the cake pump and hopper system, and construct odor control enclosure around the loading bays to meet environmental requirements.

Objectives: This project will include installing a standby cake pump, constructing a second storage hopper and constructing a building around the solids loading area.

Business Priority: This project is identified in the Master Plan as necessary for immediate reliability.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary None. Conditions: Location: 2050 Detroit Drive Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 1,787,124 Expended & Encumbered (145,517) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 1,641,607 Additional CIP Request 2,772,876 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 4,414,483

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 2,772,876 2,772,876 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 2,772,876 - 2,772,876 - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) - Foster City (Sew er) 526,846 526,846 Crystal S/SM Cty/Hillsborough 194,101 194,101 SWRCB Revolving Loan 2,051,929 2,051,929 CIP Funding Totals 2,772,876 - 2,772,876 - - -

141 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: WWTP New Headworks and Primary Clarifiers Replacement Project Project No.: 469984 Purpose: To increase the peak wet weather flow (PWWF) capacity of the preliminary treatment facilities from 60 million gallons per day (mgd) to 88 mgd. To provide screening and grit removal from raw sewage. This project is driven by the projected increase in peak wet weather flow (PWWF) to the WWTP. The current PWWF capacity of the primary treatment facilities is 60 million gallons per day (mgd), while the projected PWWF is anticipated to be 88 mgd by the year 2020.

Objectives: This project includes demolishing and replacing the WWTP influent junction box (IJB) with a new headworks facility with screening and grit removal; and demolishing and replacing Primary Clarifiers 1 and 2 with new rectangular sedimentation basins to treat 88 million gallons per day (mgd).

Business Priority: Necessary due to corroded and deteriorated condition of the IJB, and to accommodate anticipated increases in PWWF.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary Must be completed before influent flows increase above 60 mgd. Requires peak flow storage to Conditions: handle above 60 mgd. The new primary sedimentation basins will need to be on-line prior to demolition of Primary Clarifiers 1 and 2.

Location: 2050 Detroit Drive Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional CIP Request 106,000,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 106,000,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 7,100,000 7,100,000 Construction 98,900,000 10,000,000 32,000,000 32,000,000 24,900,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 106,000,000 7,100,000 10,000,000 32,000,000 32,000,000 24,900,000

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Foster City (Sew er) 20,140,000 1,349,000 18,791,000 Crystal S/SM Cty/Hillsborough 6,360,000 426,000 5,934,000 Sew er Bonds 5,325,000 5,325,000 SWRCB Revolving Loan 74,175,000 74,175,000 CIP Funding Totals 106,000,000 7,100,000 98,900,000 - - - NOTE: This project was adopted in the 5 year CIP adopted in FY14-15 as two separate projects (Headworks/#469960 and Primaries#469961). Neither project received appropriations in FY14/15 or prior. In March 2015 it was determined that the projects would be combined into a single, new project #469984, and this is being put forward in the 15/16 mid-year budget amendment.

142 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: WWTP Recycled Water Supply Facilities Project No.: 469983 Purpose: To prepare a facilities plan feasibility study for recycled water supply facilities.

Objectives: The ultimate project will include creation of recycled water supply facilities at the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). The current phase of the project includes preparation of facilities plan feasibility study which will include an implementation schedule for the recommended project and a construction financing plan to demonstrate cash flow needs. An evaluation of potential mechanisms to fund and implement the recommended project will be conducted.

Business Priority: San Mateo is working to become more sustainable and proactively plan for Climate Change. One of the ways the City is meeting these goals is to plan for the reduction in potable water from the SFPUC. Constructing recycled water supply facilities at the WWTP in conjunction with construction of a recycled water distribution system will allow for improved water conservation and reuse.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary The Recycled Water Supply Facilities Project at the Waste Water Treatment Plant is a sister Conditions: project to the Recycled Water Distribution Project (captured separately in the CIP under “Miscellaneous Projects”). The supply will need to be operational in order for the distribution system to be utilized. San Mateo received a $75,000 grant from the State Water Resources Board to develop a Recycled Water Supply Facilities Planning Study, which is scheduled to be complete at the end of 2015. Foster City will contribute to the planning study as they are partial owners of the WWTP. The remaining portion of the project was funded from capital budget from another project. Following the completion of the study and identification of a recommended project, funding will need to be identified in order for the supply and distribution system to be designed and constructed.

Location: 2050 Detroit Drive Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 180,000 Expended & Encumbered Prior Yrs Budget Balance 180,000 Additional CIP Request - Total Project 5-Yr CIP 180,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - - Construction Other - Annual Cashflow Totals ------

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) - Foster City (Sew er) - State Water Resources Bd. Grant - CIP Funding Totals ------

143 CLEAN WATER PROGRAM – WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: WWTP SCADA & Plant Control System (PCS) Project No.: 469948 Purpose: Project includes work related to SCADA and demolishing and replacing the existing Plant Control System (PCS).

Objectives: To upgrade the PCS in order to reduce potential sanitary sewer overflows in the plant, increase treatment plant system control security, and increase operational reliability.

Business Priority: This project is identified in the Master Plan as necessary for immediate reliability.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary None. Conditions: Location: 2050 Detroit Drive Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 3,114,795 Expended & Encumbered (1,292,080) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 1,822,715 Additional CIP Request 3,100,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 4,922,715

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 3,100,000 3,100,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 3,100,000 3,100,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Yr CIP Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) - Foster City (Sew er) 589,000 589,000 Crystal S/SM Cty/Hillsborough 217,000 217,000 Sew er Bonds 2,294,000 2,294,000 CIP Funding Totals 3,100,000 3,100,000 - - - -

144 PARKING FACILITIES Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Overview The City of San Mateo provides public parking facilities in downtown San Mateo to support the economic vitality of the downtown area. The public parking system includes 3,000 parking spaces in nine off-street garages and lots and on-street. In 2014, the City adopted a Downtown Parking Management Plan designed to optimize the use of existing spaces, enhance the parking experience for customers, and identify and plan for future parking needs. These future parking needs were estimated at 400 new spaces over the next 10 years with these new spaces now likely needed in the next 3-5 years given increased parking demand. The City is currently implementing this plan and making policy and operational changes to improve the downtown parking system. These changes include addressing deferred maintenance and improvement needs at City parking facilities through the projects shown in this CIP:

• Repair of the Central Garage parking deck • Replacing stairwells and refurbishing the elevator at Central and El Camino Real garages • Installing security cameras and LED lighting for most of the City’s garages and parking facilities

In FY 2014-15, $4.35 million in parking reserves was transferred from the Parking Fund to the CIP Fund to address these deferred maintenance needs beginning in 2015-16. In addition, the CIP Fund for parking includes the construction of a new downtown parking garage in FY 2017- 18 for a cost of $17.2 million, expected to be funded with $16.0 million in bonds, of which future parking revenues would be pledged for payment of annual debt service, and $1.2 million in Parking Fund reserves. Utilizing the previously appropriated Parking Fund’s reserve, the CIP recommends an appropriation of $1.2 million for design of a new downtown parking garage. Development of a plan to fund, design, and construct this new garage will begin in 2015-16.

Table 3-9 Parking CIP Project Costs & Funding Source Parking Facilities Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 New Downtown Parking Garage 17,200,000 200,000 1,000,000 16,000,000 - - Downtown Parking Improvements (1,200,000) (200,000) (1,000,000) - - - Parking 5-Year CIP Total 16,000,000 - - 16,000,000 - -

Parking Facilities Funding Sources 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Parking Bonds 16,000,000 - - 16,000,000 - - Parking 5-Year CIP Total 16,000,000 - - 16,000,000 - -

These two projects’ charters are provided in this section, as well as project charters discussing details of several current capital projects adopted by Council in previous years and are expected to be completed within the next several years.

145 PARKING FACILITIES Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Central Parking Garage Deck Repair Project No.: 461001-1002 Purpose: Improve the durability of the upper level garage deck.

Objectives: Level the area around deck expansion joints. Add new waterproof membrane on deck surface. Update railings and gutter areas. Abate exposed steel or damage concrete curbs. Re-strip parking stalls.

Business Priority: The Downtown Parking Management Plan approved in 2014 recommended that the City improve the maintenance of its parking facilities. The upper level deck at the Central Parking Garage is showing signs of fatigue and needs to be repaired with the waterproof membrane replaced. In addition, other deferred maintenance items were identified and will be addressed at the same time as the deck replacement. The City Manager’s Office will coordinate efforts with Public Works Facilities for the overall management of this project. Parking will be removed during construction times. Work may be phased. CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary The implementation of this project would need to be coordinated with Facilities. Conditions: Location: Central Parking Garage Project Manager: Vivian Ng, Administrative Technician Department: City Manager’s Office

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 1,300,000 Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance 1,300,000 Additional CIP Request - Total Project 5-Yr CIP 1,300,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - - Other - Annual Cashflow Totals ------

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Parking interfund transfer - - CIP Funding Totals ------

146 PARKING FACILITIES Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: El Camino Real Parking Garage Stairwell Replacement Project No.: 461001-1003 Purpose: Replace failing stairwells.

Objectives: Replace and install new stairwells. Minimize any trip and fall claims.

Business Priority: The Downtown Parking Management Plan approved in 2014 recommended that the City improve the maintenance of its parking facilities. The two exterior stairwells at the El Camino Garage are showing signs of deterioration and need to be replaced. This project will involve removal of the old stairwells and replacement with newer materials. The City Manager’s Office will coordinate efforts with Public Works Facilities for the overall management of this project. CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary The implementation of this project would need to be coordinated with Facilities. Conditions: Location: El Camino Real Parking Garage Project Manager: Vivian Ng, Administrative Technician Department: City Manager’s Office

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 500,000 Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance 500,000 Additional CIP Request - Total Project 5-Yr CIP 500,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other - Annual Cashflow Totals ------

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Parking interfund transfer - CIP Funding Totals ------

147 PARKING FACILITIES Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Elevator Refurbishment - Central and El Camino Parking Garages Project No.: 461001-1004 Purpose: Improve service reliability and reduce emergency call outs.

Objectives: Refurbish existing elevators. Schedule maintenance on a regular basis. Budget for required maintenance changes.

Business Priority: The Downtown Parking Management Plan approved in 2014 recommended that the City improve the maintenance of its parking facilities. The elevators at the El Camino Garage and Central Garage are frequently out of service and need to be refurbished on a regularly scheduled timeframe to maintain functionality. The City Manager’s Office will coordinate efforts with Public Works Facilities for the overall management of this project. CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary The implementation of this project would need to be coordinated with Facilities. Conditions: Location: Central Downtown Parking Garage and El Camino Real Parking Garage Project Manager: Vivian Ng, Administrative Technician Department: City Manager’s Office

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 120,000 Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance 120,000 Additional CIP Request - Total Project 5-Yr CIP 120,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other - Annual Cashflow Totals ------

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Parking interfund transfer - CIP Funding Totals ------

148 PARKING FACILITIES Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: LED Lighting at Parking Facilities Project No.: 461001-1005 Purpose: Upgrade existing lighting at parking facilities to LED lights.

Objectives: Brighter, more focused area of lighting. Cost savings due to greater efficiency of lights. Less maintenance. Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.

Business Priority: The Downtown Parking Management Plan approved in 2014 recommended that the City improve the maintenance of its parking facilities. The lighting at parking facilities needs to be enhanced to improve both the aesthetics and safety of the facilities. Converting the existing lighting to LED lights would improve the lighting while also reducing maintenance costs and greenhouse gas emissions consistent with other LED upgrades. This project is also consistent with the recommendations in the City’s Climate Action Plan and the costs would be repaid in several years through energy cost savings. The City Manager’s Office will coordinate efforts with Public Works Facilities for the overall management of this project. CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary The implementation of this project would need to be coordinated with Facilities. Conditions: Location: Various Parking Facilities Project Manager: Vivian Ng, Administrative Technician Department: City Manager’s Office

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 90,000 Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance 90,000 Additional CIP Request - Total Project 5-Yr CIP 90,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other - Annual Cashflow Totals ------

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Parking interfund transfer - CIP Funding Totals ------

149 PARKING FACILITIES Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: New Downtown Parking Garage Project No.: 461001-1006 Purpose: Increase parking availability for Downtown visitors and employees.

Objectives: Add parking capacity to existing inventory. Work with downtown stakeholders. Explore and implement mix of funding sources for a new garage.

Business Priority: In the 2014 Downtown Parking Management Plan, the consultants outlined the need for an additional 400 new public parking spaces within the next 10 years. This need is greater now given increased parking demand downtown and these additional spaces are likely needed in the next 3-5 years. Development of a plan for a new parking structure is important to meet this need for additional spaces and support the continued economic vitality of downtown San Mateo. The initial planning work with begin in 2015-16 will involve updating estimates of new spaces needed, confirming a potential location(s) for a new structure, identifying and determining funding options, and beginning initial design work. CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary Development plan will need to identify preferred location for a new garage and potential funding Conditions: sources for construction. These sources could include parking revenues, assessment district, in- lieu of parking fees, and a public-private partnership. Estimated costs for a new garage are based on 400 spaces x $40,000 per space and will be updated as part of the development plan. Location: Downtown San Mateo Project Manager: Matt Bronson, Assistant City Manager Department: City Manager’s Office

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional CIP Request 17,200,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 17,200,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 1,200,000 200,000 1,000,000 Construction 16,000,000 16,000,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 17,200,000 200,000 1,000,000 16,000,000 - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Parking transfer-in from other project 1,200,000 200,000 1,000,000 Parking Bonds 16,000,000 16,000,000 CIP Funding Totals 17,200,000 200,000 1,000,000 16,000,000 - -

150 PARKING FACILITIES Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Security Cameras Installation - Downtown Parking Project No.: 461001-1007 Purpose: Provide video monitoring and recording for public safety purposes at parking facilities.

Objectives: Enhance safety measures with garages. Provide new security cameras. Install cameras in phases.

Business Priority: The Downtown Parking Management Plan approved in 2014 recommended that the City improve the maintenance of its parking facilities. A related improvement is the installation of security cameras at parking facilities that could be used by Police to respond to car break-ins and other crimes. Both the Main Street Garage and Transit Center Garage previously had security cameras installed but were removed when redevelopment funding was eliminated. The City conducted an RFP process for installation of newer security cameras funded by parking revenues and has begun an initial installation at the Central Parking Garage. This project will be continued in 2015- 16 with cameras installed at the Main Street, Transit Center, and Main Library garages. CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary This project involves the coordination and participation of the Department of Information Conditions: Technology, Police Department, Public Works Facilities and the CMO. Location: Various Parking Facilities Project Manager: Vivian Ng, Administrative Technician Department: City Manager’s Office

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 722,000 Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance 722,000 Additional CIP Request - Total Project 5-Yr CIP 722,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other - Annual Cashflow Totals ------

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Parking interfund transfer - CIP Funding Totals ------

151

152 PARKS & RECREATION Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Overview For this report, the Parks and Recreation Department worked to identify its capital improvement needs over the next five years and prioritize them. The Department prioritized projects based on the following general criteria developed several years ago for prioritizing and funding needed capital improvements. The priorities for capital improvement funding are expected to fall within the following categories:

• To set aside funding incrementally to address needed deferred maintenance and end of lifecycle improvements.

• To insure that a system of community recreation facilities is available that meets the following goals: 1) provides appropriate and adequate spaces to meet the core programming goals of the Department; 2) improves the Department’s fiscal position; and 3) serves broad city-wide constituencies while remaining sensitive to neighborhood and geographic needs.

• To fully develop the 12 acre Bay Meadows Park consistent with the final adopted Master Plan.

• To undertake major rehabilitations within existing parks with highest priority given to expanding athletic field capacity and enhancing Central Park as the community’s signature park and link to supporting downtown vitality and economic development.

Using these criteria as a general guide, staff prioritized the projects and determined which of the priority projects could be funded with anticipated park in lieu fees. Projects included in the funded section are high priority projects deemed eligible for park in-lieu fees and priority projects already in progress that need additional funding to reach completion. Several golf course projects are also included since the golf course is setting aside anticipated revenues from its new driving range to fund its high priority capital improvement needs.

Funded Projects A total of $7.73 million in parks and recreation capital improvement projects are currently planned to be funded over the next five years. $7.395 million of those projects are proposed to be funded with park in-lieu fee revenues estimated to come in over the next five years.

Of the total projects listed in Table 3-10 on the next page, the largest project is the renovation of the Central Park Play Area. This project is the highest priority renovation among the needed play area upgrades and one of the most needed improvements at Central Park given the age of the play structures. The project is expected to cost about $6 million total, $4.5 million of that is set aside from anticipated park in-lieu fees. The next largest project is the $2.0 million set aside for a sports field conversion to synthetic turf, also funded with anticipated park in-lieu fees in FY 2018-19. The park pathway rehabilitation, park play area upgrades, special facility upgrades in parks and restroom door locks projects all set aside additional funding for ongoing capital projects such as the Laurie Meadows playground and the Beresford Bocce court renovation. Finally, some additional park in-lieu funding is recommended to assist in the completion of the Bay Meadows Master Plan. The completion of the Master Plan at Bay Meadows is a key project in the Department’s strategic planning efforts. By defining the amenities available at Bay Meadows, the Department can better plan for how to meet the demands of the growing San Mateo community at the other parks and facilities.

153 PARKS & RECREATION Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Table 3-10 Parks & Recreation CIP Project Costs & Funding Sources Parks & Recreation Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Citywide - Park Pathway Rehabilitation 225,000 225,000 - - - - Citywide - Park Play Area Upgrades 300,000 300,000 Citywide - Special Facility Upgrades in Parks 115,000 15,000 100,000 - - - Golf Course-Replace Irrigation Pump Station 200,000 - - 200,000 - - Golf Course-Re-sodding Fairways 60,000 30,000 30,000 - - - Golf Course-Well Drilling 75,000 75,000 - - - - Sports Fields Conversion Synthetic Turf 2,000,000 - - - 2,000,000 - Bay Meadows Community Park (Master Plan) 50,000 50,000 - - - - Central Park (Master Plan/Playground) 4,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 Park Site Amenities 60,000 - 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Citywide - Park Restroom Door Locks 70,000 70,000 - - - - Park Citywide Plygnd Eqp Replace/PW 75,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Parks & Recreation 5-Year CIP Total 7,730,000 780,000 2,160,000 2,730,000 2,030,000 30,000

Parks & Recreation Funding Sources 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Golf Fund (interfund tsf) 335,000 105,000 30,000 200,000 - - Park in lieu Fees 7,395,000 675,000 2,130,000 2,530,000 2,030,000 30,000 Parks & Recreation 5-Year CIP Total 7,730,000 780,000 2,160,000 2,730,000 2,030,000 30,000

In addition, three recommended projects address deferred maintenance needs at the Popular Creek Golf Course including re-sodding the fairways and drilling an irrigation well as well as replacement of an aging irrigation pump station. These golf projects depend on sufficient green fees and revenues from the new driving range expected to open in summer 2015.

The charters for these 12 currently funded projects are provided in this section along with details about their funding history.

154 PARKS & RECREATION Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Bay Meadows Community Park (Master Plan) Project No.: 610031 Purpose: Complete the Master Plan for the new Community Park and construct recommended Master Plan elements.

Objectives: • Develop Master Plan for Community Park as outlined in the General Plan. • Determine role of 12 acre park in meeting the future park and recreation needs of the San Mateo community. • Make improvements to the park land as outlined in the adopted Master Plan.

Business Priority: The completion of the Master Plan at Bay Meadows is key to the Department’s strategic planning efforts. By defining the amenities available at Bay Meadows, the Department can better plan for how to meet the demands of the growing San Mateo community at the other parks and facilities.

CIP Category: Improve quality of life Boundary The developer of the Bay Meadows project installed the current park amenities at Bay Meadows Conditions: Community Park. The City has not had an opportunity to finish the Master Plan as outlined in the General Plan. The funding currently budgeted for this project is for completion of the Master Planning process. Funding has not been identified for implementation of the Master Plan, estimated to cost between $10 and $35 million depending upon amenities in the final Master Plan.

Location: Bay Meadows Community Park Project Manager: Sheila Canzian, Director Department: Parks and Recreation Department

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 575,000 Expended & Encumbered (269,437) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 305,563 Additional CIP Request 50,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 355,563

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering1 50,000 50,000 Construction - Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 50,000 50,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Park in Lieu Fees 50,000 50,000 Total Funding 50,000 50,000 - - - - 1 Preliminary Engineering Costs include the completion of the Master Plan.

155 PARKS & RECREATION Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Central Park (Master Plan/Playgrounds) Project No.: 610027-29123 Purpose: Update the Master Plan for this signature community park.

Objectives: • Update the Master Plan for this community park, which was last adopted in 1982. • Determine role of Central Park in creating a community gathering place, creating connections to Downtown and meeting the future park and recreation needs of the San Mateo community. • Make improvements to the park as outlined in the updated Master Plan.

Business Priority: The completion of the Master Plan at Central Park is important to the Department’s strategic planning efforts. By defining the amenities available at Central Park, the Department can better plan for how to meet the demands of the growing San Mateo community at the other parks and facilities.

CIP Category: Improve quality of life Boundary The funding currently budgeted in this project is for the completion of the Master Plan Conditions: process. Funding has not been identified for the development of the Master Plan which is estimated to cost between $10 and $31 million depending upon the amenities in the final Master Plan. However, this unfunded total does not include $4.5 million in proposed park in- lieu fees to be dedicated toward the renovation of the playground that was last updated in 1994. Prior year funding in this project went to improvements projects within Central Park several years ago.

Location: Central Park Project Manager: Sheila Canzian, Director Department: Parks and Recreation Department

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 648,494 Expended & Encumbered (441,296) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 207,198 Additional CIP Request 4,500,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 4,707,198

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 4,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 4,500,000 - 2,000,000 2,500,000 - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Park in Lieu Fees 4,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 CIP Funding Totals 4,500,000 - 2,000,000 2,500,000 - -

156 PARKS & RECREATION Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Citywide - Park Pathway Rehabilitation Project No.: 610033 Purpose: Resurface and renovate pedestrian and bicycle pathways within City parks.

Objectives: • Maintain the safety and usability of concrete pathways within City parks. • Complete one remaining project with this funding and transition the ongoing renovation of the park pathways to a more appropriate funding stream.

Business Priority: The Department prioritizes providing safe pathways and accessible parks to its park users.

CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities Boundary The current and future budgets for this project are dedicated to the replacement of the Conditions: pathways at Los Prados park, to be completed in conjunction with the new synthetic turf installation.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Dennis Frank, Landscape Architect Department: Parks and Recreation Department

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 685,000 Expended & Encumbered (510,504) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 174,496 Additional CIP Request 225,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 399,496

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 225,000 225,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 225,000 225,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Park in Lieu Fees 225,000 225,000 CIP Funding Totals 225,000 225,000 - - - -

157 PARKS & RECREATION Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Citywide – Park Play Area Upgrades Project No.: 610017 Purpose: Maintain safe and playable play areas within all City parks.

Objectives: • Maintain safety of park play areas • Install new play areas as play equipment and surfacing wears out. • Maintain 20 year replacement cycle for park play areas.

Business Priority: The Department works to provide safe, healthy and active play areas for youth in San Mateo. The best practice for doing this is to replace park play areas every 20 years.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary The current funding budgeted is dedicated to the replacement of the Beresford Park play area, Conditions: Laurie Meadows play area and a small portion of the Central Park play area. The Department is asking for an additional appropriation in FY 15-16 for Laurie Meadows to replace the $300,000 borrowed to fund the Los Prados Synthetic Turf contract.

Location: Beresford, Laurie Meadows, Central Parks Project Manager: Dennis Frank, Landscape Architect Department: Parks and Recreation Department

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 4,361,000 Expended & Encumbered (404,693) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 3,956,307 Additional CIP Request 300,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 4,256,307

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 300,000 300,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 300,000 300,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Park in Lieu Fees 300,000 300,000 CIP Funding Totals 300,000 300,000 - - - -

158 PARKS & RECREATION Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Citywide - Park Restroom Door Locks Project No.: 610024 Purpose: Install automatic door locks in park restrooms.

Objectives: • Install automatic door locks where feasible on bathrooms to reduce the need for staff to open and close bathrooms each day. • Complete two remaining projects with this funding and transition the ongoing renovation and upgrades of park bathrooms to a more appropriate funding stream.

Business Priority: The Department has discovered increased staff efficiencies through installing automatic door locks on its park restrooms. Future park restroom upgrades and renovations are included in other projects.

CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities Boundary The current funding is intended for use at Beresford and Parkside Aquatic parks. Conditions: Location: Beresford, Parkside Aquatic Parks Project Manager: Mike Blondino, Parks and Landscape Maintenance Manager Department: Parks and Recreation Department

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 323,559 Expended & Encumbered (311,486) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 12,073 Additional CIP Request 70,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 82,073

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 70,000 70,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 70,000 70,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Park in Lieu Fees 70,000 70,000 CIP Funding Totals 70,000 70,000 - - - -

159 PARKS & RECREATION Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Citywide - Special Facility Upgrades in Parks Project No.: 610035 Purpose: Maintain and improve special facilities in parks including skate parks, bocce courts and other misc. park amenities.

Objectives: Maintain the safety and usability of special facilities in parks.

Business Priority: The Department provides special recreational facilities within parks to meet the demands of the community where feasible and needs to maintain their usefulness.

CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities. Boundary The current funding and $15,000 for FY 2015-16 are for two bocce courts at Beresford Park. Conditions: The $100,000 for FY 2016-17 is for the second two bocce courts at Beresford Park.

Location: Beresford Park Project Manager: Dennis Frank, Landscape Architect Department: Parks and Recreation Department

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 135,000 Expended & Encumbered (103,448) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 31,552 Additional CIP Request 115,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 146,552

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 115,000 15,000 100,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 115,000 15,000 100,000 - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 General Fund (interfund trf) - Park in Lieu Fees 115,000 15,000 100,000 CIP Funding Totals 115,000 15,000 100,000 - - -

160 PARKS & RECREATION Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Golf Course - Replace Irrigation Pump Station Project No.: 618280 Purpose: Maintain infrastructure necessary for the continued operation and economic viability of the Poplar Creek Golf Course.

Objectives: • Replace aging irrigation pump station. • Maintain the ability to adequately irrigate the golf course. • Provide superior playing conditions for golf course patrons.

Business Priority: The current irrigation pump station is 15 years old and nearing the end of its useful life as evidenced by increased equipment failures and maintenance costs. This pump station is the crucial component in the golf course irrigation system. Failure during the summer months would be catastrophic to the agronomic and economic health of the golf course.

CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities. Boundary Project dependent upon golf fee revenue performance. Conditions: Location: Poplar Creek Golf Course Project Manager: Tim Heck, Golf and Visitor Services Manager Department: Parks & Recreation - Golf

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional CIP Request 200,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 200,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 200,000 200,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 200,000 - - 200,000 - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Golf Course Revenues 200,000 200,000 CIP Funding Totals 200,000 - - 200,000 - -

161 PARKS & RECREATION Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Golf Course - Re-Sodding Fairways Project No.: 618279 Purpose: Provide an aesthetically pleasing Popular Creek Golf Course in order to maintain market share and protect revenue stream.

Objectives: • Replace damaged and bare turf areas in fairways with a more salt tolerant strain of grass. • Provide an excellent playing surface to maintain golfer demand and protect the golf course’s financial stability.

Business Priority: Recent drought conditions have raised the salinity level in the golf course water wells as the aquifers have been drawn down. Combined with historic salt intrusion from ground water influenced by close proximity to the bay, these conditions have killed the turf in many of the low lying and drainage collection areas of the fairways. This project will sod these areas with a salt tolerant strain of turf to restore the fairways to acceptable playing condition and allow the golf course to generate the necessary income to achieve its goal of financial self-sufficiency.

CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities. Boundary Conditions: None. Location: Poplar Creek Golf Course Project Manager: Tim Heck, Golf and Visitor Services Manager Department: Parks & Recreation - Golf

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional CIP Request 60,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 60,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 60,000 30,000 30,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 60,000 30,000 30,000 - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Golf Course Revenue 60,000 30,000 30,000 CIP Funding Totals 60,000 30,000 30,000 - - -

162 PARKS & RECREATION Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Golf Course - Well Drilling Project No.: 618278 Purpose: Drill new water well to replace the existing well that collapsed in the summer of 2013 at the Popular Creek Golf Course.

Objectives: • Continue to control water costs by irrigating fairways with well water and avoid having to purchase water from local utilities. • Provide and maintain sufficient source of water to accommodate the irrigation needs of the golf course. • Provide aesthetically pleasing golf course to protect revenue stream.

Business Priority: Protect existing asset and investment. The golf course saves over $500,000 annually in water costs by irrigating the fairways and roughs from two water wells on the course. One of these wells collapsed in 2013, leaving no back up if production from the second well is interrupted. An inability to irrigate for even a short period of time can jeopardize the economic health of the golf course enterprise. This project will drill a new well to replace the one that collapsed.

CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities. Boundary None. Conditions: Location; Poplar Creek Golf Course Project Manager: Tim Heck, Golf & Visitor Services Manager Department: Parks and Recreation

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional CIP Request 75,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 75,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 75,000 75,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 75,000 75,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Golf Course Revenue 75,000 75,000 CIP Funding Totals 75,000 75,000 - - - -

163 PARKS & RECREATION Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Park Citywide Playground Equipment Replacement / PW Project No.: 462897 Purpose: Replace and repair playground equipment at City parks as needed.

Objectives: • Maintain safe playgrounds • Repair and/or replace broken playground equipment

Business Priority: The Parks and Recreation Department must meet certain safety requirements at its play areas. The Department relies on the Facilities staff from Public Works to make repairs at these play areas as the need arises.

CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities Boundary No current boundary conditions. Conditions: Project Manager: Dave Fink, Fleet and Building Manager Department: Public Works Department, Facilities Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 330,000 Expended & Encumbered (206,966) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 123,034 Additional CIP Request 75,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 198,034

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 75,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 75,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 General Fund interfund trf 75,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 CIP Funding Totals 75,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000

164 PARKS & RECREATION Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Park Site Amenities Project No.: 610030 Purpose: Replace and rehabilitate site amenities within the City parks.

Objectives: Provide safe and useable amenities for park users within the City’s parks.

Business Priority: The Department wants to meet the interests of its park users in different site amenities including, but not limited to: park benches, picnic tables, BBQs, park signage, and trash cans. The following are site amenity projects recommended for the next five years: • General amenities: $15,000 per year Future projects needing a dedicated funding source include: • Park Entry signs: $110,000 • Shoreline Park Amenities: $50,000

CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities. Boundary Current budgeted funding is dedicated to the following: Conditions: Los Prados Community Garden: $50,000 Beresford picnic tables: $80,000 Exercise equipment in parks: $60,000 General site amenities: $40,000

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Mike Blondino, Parks and Landscape Maintenance Manager Department: Parks and Recreation Department

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 532,388 Expended & Encumbered (304,588) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 227,800 Additional Capital Need 60,000 Total Project Need 287,800

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other 60,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 60,000 - 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Park in lieu Fees 60,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Donations - Funding Sources Totals 60,000 - 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000

165 PARKS & RECREATION Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Sports Fields Conversion Synthetic Turf Project No.: 610023 Purpose: Convert turf fields to synthetic turf.

Objectives: • Convert turf athletic fields to synthetic turf where feasible. • Increase the availability of field time for athletic field user groups. • Reduce the need for water and ongoing maintenance by increasing the number of synthetic turf fields.

Business Priority: The Department has identified a need for additional athletic field time within the City’s parks system. One way to add additional field time is to convert some existing turf fields to synthetic turf so that they are available for more hours. The Department is proposing to allocate $2,000,000 in park-in lieu funds to a new synthetic turf field, location still unidentified, in FY 18/19.

CIP Category: Improve quality of life Boundary The current budgeted funding is dedicated to the installation of synthetic turf at Los Prados Park. Conditions: Location: Los Prados Park Project Manager: Paul Council, Community Services Manager Department: Parks and Recreation Department

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 2,760,350 Expended & Encumbered (248,854) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 2,511,496 Additional CIP Request 2,000,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 4,511,496

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 2,000,000 2,000,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 2,000,000 - - - 2,000,000 -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Park in Lieu Fees 2,000,000 2,000,000 CIP Funding Totals 2,000,000 - - - 2,000,000 -

166 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Overview The city has a comprehensive bicycle and pedestrian enhancement program. The main objective is having obstruction free with a continuous passage throughout the city.

Table 3-11 Bikeways & Pedestrian Paths CIP Project Costs & Funding Sources Bikeways & Pedestrian Paths Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 CDBG Concrete Repairs 875,000 275,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Citywide Bike/Ped Path Improvements 1,550,000 310,000 310,000 310,000 310,000 310,000 Citywide Sidewalk Repair Program 3,250,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 Bikeways & Pedestrian Paths 5-Year CIP Total 5,675,000 1,235,000 1,110,000 1,110,000 1,110,000 1,110,000

Bikeways & Pedestrian Paths Funding Sources 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 CDBG (interfund trf) 875,000 275,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 General fund (interfund trf) 2,550,000 510,000 510,000 510,000 510,000 510,000 Measure A Half Cent Sales Tax 1,500,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 Sidewalk repair 750,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Bikeways & Pedestrian Paths 5-Year CIP Total 5,675,000 1,235,000 1,110,000 1,110,000 1,110,000 1,110,000

Projects Justification The two annual sidewalk improvement projects allow the City to make sure the walkways provide a consistent and safe walking surface. The bicycle improvement projects are consistent with our adopted Bicycle Master Plan and provide for an enhanced bicycle network within the City provide links to facilities in surrounding jurisdictions.

These three projects’ charters are provided in this section, as well as project charters discussing details of several current capital projects adopted by Council in previous years that are expected to be completed within the next several years.

167 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: CDBG Concrete Repairs Project No.: 461212 Purpose: Utilize available CDBG funds to eliminate sidewalk defects or address failed streets within the CDBG area.

Objectives: • Eliminate potential claims due to un-even sidewalk and/or pot holes that exist on City streets. • Reduce backlog on failed streets. • Provide continuous pedestrian access within the CDBG area.

Business Priority: Continue to provide pedestrian access throughout the CDBG area. Improve pedestrian safety.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary In order to be eligible using CDBG fund, the project location must be within the CDBG area Conditions: which is designated through the use of household income data provided by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development Department. Funding allocation varies year by year depending on the funding availability.

Location: City-wide Project Managers: Sandy Council, Neighborhood Improvement & Housing Manager Otis Chan, Senior Engineer Department: Community Development Department, Housing Division, and Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 5,441,431 Expended & Encumbered (5,404,011) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 37,420 Additional CIP Request 875,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 912,420

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 140,000 40,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Construction 735,000 235,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 875,000 275,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 CDBG (interfund trf) 875,000 275,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 General Fund (interfund tfr) - CIP Funding Totals 875,000 275,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000

168 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Citywide Bicycle Parking Project No.: 465162 Purpose: Implementation of Bicycle Master Plan Recommendation 5.4.2 – Citywide Bicycle Parking Recommendations.

Objectives: • Increase the bicycling mode share by providing secure bicycle parking facilities throughout the City. • Installation of the decorative bicycle racks at all City facilities. • Installation of the standard inverted U bicycle rack in the public right of way.

Business Priority: Implementation of the City Council approved Bicycle Master Plan.

CIP Category: Improve quality of life Boundary This project is fully funded by TDA Article 3 Grant funds with an implementation deadline by the Conditions: end of 2016.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Kenneth Chin, Project Manager II Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 76,248 Expended & Encumbered Prior Yrs Budget Balance 76,248 Additional CIP Request - Total Project 5-Yr CIP 76,248

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other - Annual Cashflow Totals ------

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 TDA Grant - Gas Tax - CIP Funding Totals ------

169 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Citywide Bike/Pedestrian Path Improvements Project No.: 465004 Purpose: To construct, improve, or enhance the City’s pedestrian and bicycle trail infrastructure.

Objectives: • Reduce pedestrian and bicycle injuries and fatalities citywide by improving the City’s pedestrian and bicycle trial infrastructure. • Increase the pedestrian and bicycle travel mode share. • Project funds are leveraged as matching funds for pedestrian and bicycle grant application requirements.

Business Priority: This project ensures that the City has annual funds to improve the pedestrian and bicycle environment throughout the City.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary Continuous funding of this account will ensure that the City of San Mateo is committed to becoming Conditions: a more pedestrian and bicycle friendly City. Funds for this project are needed to for safety improvement projects not identified in the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plans. Additionally, for the past few years the City has been extremely successful in obtaining grant funds to improve the pedestrian and bicycling environment. This project account has been a “set aside” of fund to ensure that the City has sufficient matching funds to apply for upcoming grant applications, as they become available. Annually, $110,000 has been included in this budget, but this amount has not explicitly included funds for grant application’s requiring matching funds. Therefore, an additional $200k is recommended annually to ensure the City can successfully compete with other agencies for grants.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Kenneth Chin, Project Manager II Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 1,270,882 Expended & Encumbered (1,035,877) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 235,005 Additional CIP Request 1,550,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 1,785,005

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 550,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 Other 1,000,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 1,550,000 310,000 310,000 310,000 310,000 310,000

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Measure A Half-Cent Sales Tax 1,500,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 General Fund (interfund tfr) 50,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 CIP Funding Totals 1,550,000 310,000 310,000 310,000 310,000 310,000

170 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Citywide Sidewalk Repair Program Project No.: 463231 Purpose: The purpose of the sidewalk repair program is to eliminate potential trip and fall claims.

Objectives: • Eliminate potential claims due to un-even sidewalk and/or curb and gutter. • Provide continuous pedestrian access and enhance the pedestrian serviceability of the neighborhood.

Business Priority: This annual sidewalk repair program was approved by the City Council in 2009. The goal is to eliminate as many uneven sidewalk areas as possible for the entire city in 15 years.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary The boundary is set based on the approved 15 year Sidewalk Repair List by the City Council in Conditions: 2009. Funding source for this project has been from the General Fund and property owners, who are responsible to contribute for their share of the cost when repair work is related to tree roots. Funding of $500,000 per year through FY 2019-20 from the General Fund is recommended and included in the future forecast.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Otis Chan, Senior Engineer Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 8,425,201 Expended & Encumbered (8,454,763) Prior Yrs Budget Balance (29,562) Additional CIP Request 3,250,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 3,220,438

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 300,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 Construction 2,950,000 590,000 590,000 590,000 590,000 590,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 3,250,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 650,000

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sidew alk repair 750,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Measure A Half-Cent Sales Tax - General Fund (interfund tfr) 2,500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 CIP Funding Totals 3,250,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 650,000

171 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Downtown Signal Controller Upgrades Project No.: 465163 Purpose: The purpose of this project is to immediate improve pedestrian and bicycle safety by purchasing and installing advanced traffic controller equipment/software. The project includes the purchase and installation of (25) twenty-five 2070 traffic controllers and D4 traffic operating software. These new traffic controllers will be installed in Downtown San Mateo where exists the highest pedestrian activity in the City along with the highest number of pedestrian involved motor vehicle collisions. The new controllers will allow the City to implement a Lead Pedestrian Interval (LPI) within the traffic signalization cycle which will give the pedestrian 2-4 seconds of advance walking time prior to the light turning green for motor vehicles.

Objectives: This will improve pedestrian safety and should reduce pedestrian to motor vehicle collisions by providing not only more time for pedestrians to cross the street, but also provide 2-4 seconds of time for pedestrian to cross when all motor vehicle traffic is stopped. The traffic signal changes will aid pedestrian travel.

Business Priority: The project is supported by the City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Commission (also known as the Public Works Commission), Planning Commission and City Council. This project is in the Pedestrian Master Plan, approved by the BPAC/Public Works Commission, Planning Commission and the City Council.

CIP Category: Improve quality of life Boundary This project is funded with TDA Article 3 FY 2013/2014 funds. The project must be completed by Conditions: June 30th, 2016 in order to receive full reimbursement.

Location: Downtown San Mateo Project Manager: Tracy Scramaglia, Senior Engineer Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 150,000 Expended & Encumbered (62,136) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 87,864 Additional CIP Request - Total Project 5-Yr CIP 87,864

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other - Annual Cashflow Totals ------

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 TDA Grant - CIP Funding Totals ------

172 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Safe Routes to School Program Project No.: 465164 Purpose: Implementation of the City of San Mateo Safe Routes to School Program for all 15 of the elementary and middle schools within the City. The project focuses on the 5 E’s (Education, Encouragement, Engineering, Enforcement, and Evaluation) to reduce motor vehicular pickup and drop off and increase walking and biking to school.

Objectives: • Implementation Bicycle Master Plan Recommendation 6.1.2 – Safe Routes to School Program and Pedestrian Master Plan Recommendation 6.1.2. – Safe Routes to School Program. • Increase pedestrian safety and travel mode share by improving the existing facilities around schools. • Comply with current ADA requirements. • Encourage Safe Routes to School with enhanced pedestrian and bicycle facilities.

Business Priority: Implementation of recommendations is City Council approved in both the Bicycle Master Plan and Pedestrian Master Plan.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary The City of San Mateo received a $2.515 Million grant from the State’s Active Transportation Conditions: Program to develop and implement a Safe Routes to School Program. The program utilizes the 5 E’s (Education, Encouragement, Engineering, Enforcement, and Evaluation) to increase the pedestrian and bicycle travel mode share to school. Project funds for this project will not be received until Spring of 2015 with implementation required to be completed by June of 2016.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Kenneth Chin, Project Manager II Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 2,515,000 Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance 2,515,000 Additional CIP Request - Total Project 5-Yr CIP 2,515,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other - Annual Cashflow Totals ------

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Active Transportation Grant - CIP Funding Totals ------

173

174 AFFORDABLE HOUSING Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Overview The Neighborhood Improvement and Housing Division of the Community Development Department manage the City’s Affordable Housing programs. Funding to assist the city with offering affordable housing programs comes from federal and state sources, as well as support from the City’s General Fund.

In order to qualify for federal affordable housing funding, the city is required by the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) to develop and approve a 5-Year Consolidated Plan that establishes strategies for addressing the City's priority needs and identifies funding priorities for the City's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and Home Investment Partnership (HOME) programs in order to plan and coordinate community development programs in a comprehensive manner.

Table 3-12 outlines the Affordable Housing projects for 2015-2020. This CIP contains two affordable housing projects totaling $1.86 million.

Table 3-12 Affordable Housing Recommended CIP Project Costs & Funding Sources Affordable Housing Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Bay Meadows Affordable Housing Site 1,476,500 - 1,476,500 - - - Minor Home Repair 390,000 90,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Affordable Housing 5-Year CIP Total 1,866,500 90,000 1,551,500 75,000 75,000 75,000

Affordable Housing Funding Sources 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 CDBG Funds 390,000 90,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 HOME Funds 276,500 - 276,500 - - - General Fund 1,200,000 - 1,200,000 - - - Affordable Housing 5-Year CIP Total 1,866,500 90,000 1,551,500 75,000 75,000 75,000

Each year of the Consolidated Plan there is an Action Plan prepared that discusses the proposed activities for the upcoming fiscal year in accordance with the Consolidated Plan strategies. Many of these programs are targeted to serve primarily low-income residents of all racial, ethnic and disabled populations and the City particularly encourages the participation of affected residents in scheduled public hearings and plan reviews. The current Draft 2015-2017 Consolidated Plan and the 2015-16 Annual Plan can be located on the city’s website at: http://www.cityofsanmateo.org/index.aspx?NID=1092

Projects Justification The first project is the Bay Meadows Affordable Housing site project totaling $1.48 million for the development of one acre of a city-owned site for affordable rental family housing. This project’s funding comes from $1.2 million in General Fund support and $276,000 from federal Home Investment Partnership (HOME) funds, and would provide housing for households who income does not exceed 50% of the area median income.

General Fund support was a result of accumulated balances the City Council has been setting aside from proceeds the City has received in “residual” property tax increment RPTTF distributions related to redevelopment activities. Affordable housing projects lost an important

175 AFFORDABLE HOUSING Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP funding source in 2012 due to the dissolution of all the redevelopment agencies state-wide. Previously redevelopment law required to “set-aside” of 20% of a RDA project area’s property tax increment revenue for affordable housing projects. In order to express the Council’s support for this practice, this set-aside was continued by the City with 20% of each year’s RPTTF “residual” revenue received by the General Fund reserved for affordable housing projects. As of June 30, 2014, the balance of the affordable housing set aside General fund reserve totaled $1,248,585.

The second is an ongoing project called the Minor Home Repairs Program. The City of San Mateo has teamed up with a number of agencies for our Minor Home Repair Program which offers various construction, exterior painting services, housing accessibility modifications, and energy/water retrofit measures to income qualified individuals free of charge. A total over the five-years of $390,000 is included in the CIP, all of which is funded with federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds.

176 AFFORDABLE HOUSING Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Bay Meadows Affordable Housing Site Project No.: 310416 Purpose: Develop city-owned one acre site into affordable rental family housing.

Objectives: • Provide housing for households whose incomes do not exceed 50% of area median. • Optimize sustainable development principals into the design and construction. • Incorporate traffic management programs for residents.

Business Priority: Provide affordable housing.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary Project will require selection of a non-profit developer to manage financing of the project including Conditions: application periods for tax credits, other government funding sources.

Location: Bay Meadows Project Manager: Sandy Council, Neighborhood Improvement and Housing Manager Department: Community Development Department, Neighborhood Improvement and Housing Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 25,466,762 Expended & Encumbered (24,910,382) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 556,380 Additional CIP Request 1,476,500 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 2,032,880

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other 1,476,500 1,476,500 Annual Cashflow Totals 1,476,500 - 1,476,500 - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 HOME Funds 276,500 276,500 General Fund tsf from reserves (Housing set-aside) 1,200,000 1,200,000 CIP Funding Totals 1,476,500 - 1,476,500 - - -

* Prior Year Budget for past new housing land purchases in various areas of the City, much of it funded with redevelopment funds.

177 AFFORDABLE HOUSING Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Minor Home Repair Project No.: 310521 Purpose: Provide funds to providers to perform minor home and paint repairs to lower income households citywide free of charge.

Objectives: • Preserve existing housing stock. • Prevent deterioration of neighborhoods.

Business Priority: Housing and neighborhood preservation.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary Program is funded with CDBG which requires income documentation to be eligible for Conditions: assistance.

Location: City-wide Project Managers: Sandy Council, Neighborhood Improvement and Housing Manager Department: Community Development Department, Neighborhood Improvement and Housing Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 878,803 Expended & Encumbered (842,999) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 35,804 Additional CIP Request 390,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 425,804

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 390,000 90,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 390,000 90,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 CDBG (interfund trf) 390,000 90,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 CIP Funding Totals 390,000 90,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000

178 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Overview As buildings and City facilities age, they require maintenance and upgrades for the health and safety of the public and City’s staff as well as addressing federal and state laws. Table 3-13 below includes funding or replacement of major building components for the Police Station, Library and various Fire Stations. In light of recent drought conditions, re-landscaping City Hall with drought-tolerant plants will improve the image of the City of San Mateo and provide an example of water conservation to residents.

Table 3-13 City Facilities & Buildings CIP Project Costs & Funding Sources Facilities & Building Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 City Hall Landscaping-Water Conservation 150,000 150,000 - - - - New Building Component Replace (Status Quo) 2,050,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 Facilities & Building 5-Year CIP Total 2,200,000 560,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 410,000

Facilities & Building Funding Sources 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 General Fund 2,200,000 560,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 Facilities & Building 5-Year CIP Total 2,200,000 560,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 410,000

A total of $2.2 million is proposed for the 5-Year CIP for City Facilities and Buildings category’s two projects, all of which is funded by the General Fund.

Projects Justification The City Hall Landscaping-Water Conservation project is proposed to receive $150,000 in General Fund resources in FY 2015-16. The City Hall property includes large expanses of lawn and high water use plantings. The property experiences very limited use by either city employees or the public. Due to severe drought conditions staff recommends the replacement of high water use landscaping with drought tolerant vegetation and landscaping materials while maintaining overall positive appearance of the facility. Cost of project will eventually be off-set by reduced water use cost, the exact time for return on investment cannot be accurately calculated primarily due to unknown rate increases/changes that may result due to insufficient water sources.

The New Building Component Replacement project is a general ongoing project that includes building and facilities deferred maintenance needs individually costing less than $50,000. Over the five-year CIP period, $2.05 million will be used to maintain or replace major building components at the Public Library, Police Station, Fire Stations 23, 24 and 26, and recreation facilities throughout San Mateo, as well as provide some fund balance to meet immediate need requirements for unforeseen equipment failures. Status Quo funding is proposed at $410,000 annually at this time due to limited General Fund resources.

All of San Mateo’s buildings include major components that are critical to the mission of those facilities such as Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Systems. While the facilities maintenance team actively pursues preventative maintenance procedures, accurate prediction of the day/time of failure is not possible. Therefore this fund is created in order to have available adequate funding for the purpose of replacement or major repair of assets. This is a mission critical funding.

179 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

In FY 2013-14, an independent Life Cycle Cost assessment study was commissioned by the Public Works Department that identified a significant level of unfunded deferred maintenance amongst the City’s many facilities and buildings. Based on this recent assessment, an annual funding level of $1.0 million was recommended for needs meeting this ongoing project’s criteria, leaving a balance of $590,000 annually without a funding source. Additionally, numerous larger deferred maintenance projects identified in the assessment also remain unfunded. For more information on unfunded projects, refer to the Capital Needs Assessment section.

These two projects’ charters are provided in this section, as well as project charters discussing details of several current capital projects adopted by Council in previous years that are either ongoing projects or are expected to be completed within the next several years.

180 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: City Hall Atrium and CDD Remodel Project No.: 310118 Purpose: City Hall Renovations for CDD, Parks & Rec, Public Works, and the Public. Objectives: • Revitalize City Hall and the City’s public service (well- staffed and equipped counters). • Provide work spaces that meet the needs of the users by optimizing the areas available. • Meet Zucker Systems audit recommendations. • Design and build for accessibility and energy efficiency, provide seismic upgrades. • Re-use, reduce and recycle resources. • Deliver the project within budget and schedule. • Minimize disruptions to services during construction.

Business Priority: This project fits into the goals of the City to improve public services; provide for the CDD expansion; relocate Parks & Rec Administration back into City Hall; and provide adequate work spaces for employees. The Community Development Department has added a number of employees over the past year given workload demands and the recommendations of the Zucker Systems management audit. This project is necessary to add additional work spaces in City Hall to accommodate this growth in conjunction with the previous relocation of the Public Works Engineering Division out of City Hall offsite. Plans include renovation of the building and planning permit counter as well as other improvements to the City Hall Atrium designed to improve the customer experience at City Hall. Given the scope of the improvement to work spaces and the atrium, additional building upgrades to City Hall are required to ensure accessibility, energy efficiency, and seismic integrity. Various funding sources will be used with the Building Fund serving as the primary source given the role of building activity in necessitating these improvements. CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities Boundary Construction will be phased in order to minimize disruptions to City Hall. Due to the amount of Conditions: construction that will take place, construction to meet ADA compliance and other upgrades to meet new codes will be included in the project. This project is beginning in FY 2014-15 given the need for additional work spaces and will be completed in FY 2015-16. Location: 330 W. 20th Avenue Project Manager: David Fink, Facilities and Fleet Manager and Gogo Heinrich, Project Manager Department: Public Works Department, Facilities Division

181 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 1,070,000 Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance 1,070,000 Additional CIP Request - Total Project 5-Yr CIP 1,070,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other - Annual Cashflow Totals ------

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 General Fund (interfund trf) - Constr Srvs & Planning funds - Bldg Maintenance Fund - CIP Funding Totals ------

182 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: City Hall Landscaping- Water Conservation Project No.: 461111 Purpose: Re-landscape City Hall with drought- tolerant plants and drip irrigation system.

Objectives: • Reduce water usage. • Remove turf and re-landscape with drought tolerant plants and irrigation system. • Provide a bio-swale to capture run- off from building.

Business Priority: Improve the image of the City of San Mateo. Provide an example of water conservation to residents. Reduce utility costs and maintenance.

CIP Category: Improve quality of life. Boundary During the April 7, 2014 City Council meeting a staff presentation on the City’s water conservation Conditions: efforts inspired several residents to suggest re-landscaping City Hall with drought-tolerant plants.

Location: 330 W. 20th Avenue Project Manager: David Fink, Facilities and Fleet Manager Department: Public Works Department, Facilities Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional CIP Request 150,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 150,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 150,000 150,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 150,000 150,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 General Fund (interfund trf) 150,000 150,000 CIP Funding Totals 150,000 150,000 - - - -

183 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: New Building Component Replacement (Status Quo Funding) Project No.: 469030 Purpose: Provide funding for replacement or substantial overhaul of major building components including; Environmental components (HVAC), Book Handling Machine, Flooring, Lighting, Electrical and Plumbing Components, Doors, Windows, Roofing, Elevators and other building components as required.

Objectives: Provide additional funding to meet expanded facility square footage such as Main Library, Police Headquarters and Fire Stations, 23, 24 and 26. Provide a fund balance to meet immediate need requirements for unforeseen equipment failures that impact the objectives of City managed facilities.

Business Priority: This is a critical funding source to enable the facilities team to meet the needs of both city employees and the public by effectively maintaining or replacing major building components as needed. The additional funding requirements are due to the additional square footage of new facilities put into service within the city and to prepare for replacing aging inventory. Status Quo funding is recommended at $410,000 annual, although an additional $590,000 annual is identified as needed but unfunded. Total $1.0 million per year funding level is based upon independent Life Cycle Cost assessment commissioned by the Public Works Department, Facilities Division in FY 2013-14.

CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities Boundary Funds must be used for specific major components as established by Public Works senior Conditions: management team.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: David Fink, Facilities and Fleet Manager Department: Public Works Department, Facilities Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 2,447,537 Expended & Encumbered (1,498,150) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 949,387 Additional CIP Request 2,050,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 2,999,387

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 2,050,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 2,050,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 410,000

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 General Fund (interfund trf) 2,050,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 CIP Funding Totals 2,050,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 410,000 410,000

184 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Police HVAC Modifications Project No.: 461006 Purpose: Design and construct changes to the Police Station HVAC system using a value engineering evaluation approach to look for opportunities to deliver the need HVAC in a more cost effective manner.

Objectives: Currently, the existing HVAC system is in failure mode and is not maintainable. The retro- commissioning work completed by Axiom Engineers identified malfunctioning mechanical equipment and building management controls. Efforts to remedy the HVAC situation are on- going and construction errors may have contributed to the problem. Axiom provided an analysis for a fully operational HVAC system, and recommended the existing system be replaced with smaller units which have simpler maintenance requirements.

Business Priority: For health and safety, the heating, ventilating and air-conditioning systems of the building need to meet code and energy standards.

CIP Category: Major services and equipment replacement Boundary Construction bids in progress and this project is scheduled to complete in Fiscal Year 2014- Conditions: 2015.

Location: San Mateo Police Headquarters Project Manager: David Fink, Facilities and Fleet Manager and Gogo Heinrich, Project Manager Department: Public Works Department, Facilities & Fleet Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 755,000 Expended & Encumbered (59,618) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 695,382 Additional CIP Request - Total Project 5-Yr CIP 695,382

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other - Annual Cashflow Totals ------

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2% Hotel Tax fund - Building & Maint. Fund trf - CIP Funding Totals ------

185 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Public Facility & Site Improvements Project No.: 461004 Purpose: The purpose of this project is to set aside funds to address the needs of the City’s various buildings, public facilities and site improvements, as they arise.

Objectives: • Provide managerial flexibility to address unanticipated issues impacting the city’s operations or quality service delivery. • Support City staff and departmental operations in order tat services continue to be delivered efficiently. • Promote safety and health of City workplaces. • Maintain compliance with federal and state laws related to City facilities.

Business Priority: Maintaining safe and efficient City facilities for the use by the public and City employees is required by federal and state law, and supports more efficient operations of the organization and quality customer service. This project was created to proactively plan for the unexpected breakdown of facilities, and to support the capital needs of the city’s administrative support and customer service departments.

CIP Category: Improve quality of life Boundary This is an ongoing project that retains balances derived from a base General Fund appropriation Conditions: and lease revenues from tenants renting space owed by the City within the Main Street/Transit Center Garage. The ability to address unexpected facility needs limited by lease’s revenue generation.

Location: 330 W. 20th Ave Project Manager: David Fink, Facilities and Fleet Manager Department: Public Works Department, Facilities Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 791,730 Expended & Encumbered (487,874) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 303,856 Additional CIP Request - Total Project 5-Yr CIP 303,856

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other - Annual Cashflow Totals ------

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 General Fund (interfund trf) - Transit Cnt/Main St Leases - Easment Revenues - Fence Repair - CIP Funding Totals ------

186 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Overview The total proposed funding for Information Technology projects is $755,000, and is for three projects.

Table 3-14 Information Technology Recommended CIP Project Costs & Funding Sources Information Technology Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Parks and Recreation Business Software 200,000 200,000 - - - - Public Works Document Imaging 375,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 CiRM System Implementation 180,000 180,000 - - - - Information Technology 5-Year CIP Total 755,000 455,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000

Information Technology Funding Sources 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 General fund (interfund trf) 380,000 380,000 - - - - Measure A Half Cent Sales Tax 375,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Information Technology 5-Year CIP Total 755,000 455,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000

Resources from the General Fund of $380,000 are budgeted for FY 2015-16 to fund two of the three projects. The third project, Public Works Document Imaging, is an ongoing project that receives Measure A Half-cent Sales Tax revenues.

These three projects’ charters are provided in this section, as well as project charters discussing details of several current capital projects adopted by Council in previous years that are either ongoing projects or and are expected to be completed within the next several years.

187 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: CiRM System Implementation Project No.: 212007 Purpose: The City Manager has articulated a vision where the public can report issues / make requests with their smartphones, and have those requests responded to, processed, and closed, with feedback. This project includes streamlining our business to be responsive to the public, and providing easy to use, intuitive tools to facilitate work. This is described in technology terms as Customer or Citizen Relationship Management (CiRM). It involves both end user apps or interfaces, integration with or replacement of back end request/work order handling systems, and business processes evaluation and possible re-design.

Objectives: • Implement a tool by which anyone can submit a request or report a problem to the City using a smartphone, along with other communication channels. • Implement request processing flows for all requests types that come from the public. • Create, integrate with, and/or replace line of business request processing / work order systems to support all request types. • Evaluate, and re-design City request management processes as needed.

Business Priority: Satisfies a City Manager key interest and City initiative, and follows on from prior IT and departmental work plan items to plan for an implement CiRM.

CIP Category: Major services & equipment replacement Boundary This project requires significant coordination among user departments. It requires significant Conditions: coordination of processes across City departments and their divisions; understanding of business process and to make modifications as needed; to define user requirements and functionality that meets or exceeds expectations; and finally; a funding source has not yet been identified.

Location: 330 W. 20th Ave Project Manager: Peter Roth, Sr. Systems Analyst Department: Information Technology, Business Consulting

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional CIP Request 180,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 180,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other 180,000 180,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 180,000 180,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 General Fund (interfund trf) 180,000 180,000 CIP Funding Totals 180,000 180,000 - - - -

188 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Development Review Software Project No.: 310211 Purpose: The City awarded the contract for Permitting and Project Tracking Software and implementation to Tyler-EnerGov web-based enterprise product. The project kick-off was on November 2013 and implementation to be completed in 18 to 24 months. EnerGov 9 will be used for Building permitting, review and inspection, Planning application and review, Code Enforcement cases, Public Works permits and inspection, Business and Professional taxes and permits, Parks tree permitting, Police permitting and review, and Fire review and inspection.

Objectives The primary business goals and objectives for this project are as follows: • Implementation of an integrated web-based, GIS and property centric Permit and Project Tracking system which can be leveraged by multiple departments to manage transactions and operations. • Process improvement with a focus on automation and standardization across departments and minimization of manual processes. • As defined within scope, improved integration across internal and external applications to provide citywide access to data. • Replacement of outdated software and hardware that has reached the end of its useful life. • Adoption of current technologies that offer flexibility in navigation, reporting and user level configuration. • Empower employees to work proactively rather than reactively, to be able to find answers to daily questions faster, and analyze business performance with flexible reporting tools. • Simplification of methods to access and present data for reporting and analysis. • Improvement of service and responsiveness to City constituents, stakeholders and others (e.g. external agencies, developers, etc.).

Business Priority: The EnerGov Software Project is designed to enhance permit processes to the benefit of our customers and organization. Estimated to Go-Live on June 1, 2015, meeting all of the project objectives and budget. CIP Category: Major service and equipment replacement Boundary To accomplish the goals, objectives and deliverables within the estimate timelines, budget and Conditions: management structure defined in the Project Charter and Project Plan.

Location: 330 W. 20th Ave Project Manager: Phil Kawakami, Permit System Coordinator Department: Community Development Department, Building Division

189 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 2,603,941 Expended & Encumbered (2,196,235) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 407,706 Additional CIP Request - Total Project 5-Yr CIP 407,706

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other - Annual Cashflow Totals ------

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Bldg Permits (interfund tfr) - General Fund (interfund tfr) - Vehicle & Equip fund (interfund tfr) - CIP Funding Totals ------

190 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Parks and Recreation Business Software Project No.: 610872 Purpose: Purchase and install new parks and recreation business software to replace the aging Class software system.

Objectives: Select and install a new software system to meet business needs of Parks and Recreation and potentially the Library.

Business Priority: The Department currently relies on the Class software system to process registrations, book facilities and to manage many of its revenue generating services. Class will retire in 2017 and needs to be replaced.

CIP Category: Major services & equipment replacement Boundary No current boundary conditions. Conditions: Location: 330 W. 20th Ave Project Manager: Abby Veeser, Sr. Management Analyst Department: Parks and Recreation Department

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional CIP Request 200,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 200,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other-Purchase and Installation 200,000 200,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 200,000 200,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 General Fund (interfund tfr) 200,000 200,000 CIP Funding Totals 200,000 200,000 - - - -

191 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: PCI – DSS Credit Card Processing Infrastructure Project No.: 461004-xxxx Purpose: Purchase and install hardware and/or software to modify the City’s existing infrastructure for processing credit card transactions.

Objectives: The target goal is to bring the City into PCI Category B: Imprint machines only or only standalone, dial-out terminals with no electronic cardholder data storage. Achieving this objective would avoid threats of customers’ credit card data, lawsuits, be liable for remunerating customers’ charges, incur additional fees issued by our bank, lose the ability to process credit cards (75% of P&R’s sales are credit-card transactions), and lose the public’s trust.

Business Priority: The credit-card security trade consortium Payment Card Industry (PCI) has developed the Data Security Standards (DSS) information security standard for organizations offering credit-card transactions to customers. PCI-DSS is used as a set of guidelines used by merchants to harden computer infrastructures and operations against fraud and theft of customer data. Non- compliance results in fines, loss of ability to process transactions and – significantly – increased potential theft of customer credit card data with resulting financial liabilities. The PCI DSS is the global data security standard that any business of any size must adhere to in order to accept payment cards. As of October 2012, the City’s businesses account for about 41,000 total credit- card transactions per year. All City point-of-sale (POS) systems utilize City computers and network infrastructure. Credit card data is gathered in multiple ways, and although not stored in any database the critical data is resident on City resources for various periods of time. This represents a threat to fraud and theft to the City.

CIP Category: Major services & equipment replacement Boundary The Finance Department’s Treasury staff assigned to the PCI Compliance Team is currently in Conditions: the process of: 1) conducting an comprehensive inventory of credit card processing terminals and other portals requiring PCI compliance, and 2) pursuing compliance requirements by registering with TrustWave/Wells Fargo for completion of the risk self-assessment questionnaire, setting up period scans of credit card processing transactions to determine level of threats and compliance, and developing a required PCI-DSS policy. Based on this assessment, then a modification of the City’s current credit card processing / information systems infrastructure may be needed. Specific requirements related to modifying the infrastructure will be determined during FY 2015-16. This project funding is a preliminary estimate of the cost for modifying the infrastructure.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Kathleen VonAchen, Deputy Finance Director Department: Finance Department

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 50,000 Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance 50,000 Additional CIP Request - Total Project 5-Yr CIP 50,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other - Annual Cashflow Totals ------

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 General Fund (interfund tfr) - CIP Funding Totals ------

192 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Public Works Document Imaging Project No.: 461102 Purpose: To convert to a paperless system of document management.

Objectives: • To reduce the need for physical storage of drawings and project files.

Business Priority: Space constraints are an issue requiring the need for reduction of on-site physical storage of drawings and project files. There is also a need to be able to electronically search drawings and documents.

CIP Category: Major service and equipment replacement Boundary The need for document imaging has been identified. Process and staffing has yet to be Conditions: identified for on-going success of the process.

Location: 330 W. 20th Ave Project Manager: Gary Heap, Engineering Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 545,000 Expended & Encumbered (535,825) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 9,175 Additional CIP Request 375,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 384,175

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other 375,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 375,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) - Measure A Half-cent Sales Tax 375,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 CIP Funding Totals 375,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000

193 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Technology Projects (Master Plan) Project No.: 212007 Purpose: This project number represents multiple approved projects to upgrade and implement mission-critical technologies identified in the ‘Technology Master Plan’. Phases in this project are items that were identified within that master plan.

Objectives: Complete mission-critical technology upgrades, conduct ongoing GIS/mapping and PC replacement programs and implement new technologies as defined in the Technology Master Plan. The list of approved Technology Master Plan items include the following initiatives: - Network Support - Internet Mapping Application - Supplement DoIT Resources - Satellite Phone (complete) - Upgrade Parks Tree Program (complete) - Police Crime Mapping / Reporting (complete) - Network Admission Control (complete) - IT Office Space (complete) - AS400 Migration - CAD/RMS Migration - Email Migration - Telephone System Upgrade - PC Replacement (ongoing) - Fire Suppression Mapping (ongoing) - Pre-planned Tactical and EOC Mapping (ongoing)

Business Priority: To implement key technologies based on the defined goals from the Technology Master Plan (2011-2016) 1) Make Government Data/Services More Accessible to Citizens and Staff 2) Implement Common Business Applications and Systems 3) Ensure Security, Privacy, Reliability, Performance of City’s Technology Infrastructure 4) Establish Technology Governance Structure 5) Maintain Technology Workforce

CIP Category: Major services and equipment replacement Boundary Limits to staff resources; City’s ability to absorb and assimilate technology changes. Conditions: Location: 330 W. 20th Ave Project Manager: Peter Owen, Information Technology Director Department: Information Technology Department

194 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 1,745,438 Expended & Encumbered (1,250,245) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 495,193 Additional CIP Request - Total Project 5-Yr CIP 495,193

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Other - Annual Cashflow Totals ------

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 General Fund (interfund tfr) - CIP Funding Totals ------

195

196 MISCELLANEOUS CITY PROJECTS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Overview The City is committed to maintaining its long history of providing cultural experiences and providing services to its citizens. The Miscellaneous City Projects includes funding of $880,566 for Public Art, Commuter Shuttles, Tree Planting and Assisting Non-Profits with Capital Improvements to their San Mateo facilities. In Table 3-15 below, the largest expense, $385,000, is for the San Mateo Commuter Shuttle which will provide alternative transportation to single- occupancy vehicles.

Table 3-15 Miscellaneous City Projects CIP Project Costs & Funding Sources Miscellaneous Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 CDBG Community Non-Profit Facilities 100,000 50,000 50,000 - - - San Mateo Commuter Shuttle 385,000 35,000 35,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 Art in Public Places 155,566 155,566 - - - - Citywide Tree Planting – Parks Division 240,000 - 75,000 45,000 75,000 45,000 Miscellaneous 5-Year CIP Total 880,566 240,566 160,000 150,000 180,000 150,000

Miscellaneous Funding Sources 5-Yr TOTAL CIP FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Arts in Public Places Fee 155,566 155,566 CDBG (interfund trf) 100,000 50,000 50,000 - - - Misc-State Grants 315,000 - - 105,000 105,000 105,000 Shuttle Bus Revenue 70,000 35,000 35,000 - - - Tree Impact and Removal Fee 240,000 - 75,000 45,000 75,000 45,000 Miscellaneous 5-Year CIP Total 880,566 240,566 160,000 150,000 180,000 150,000

The City is also committing $240,000 to replacing or replanting damaged or aging trees while also increasing the number of street and park trees. An additional $155,500 will be used to further beautify the City by installing new Public Place Artwork and maintaining the existing displays. Fees will be used to fund the Arts in Public Places, and state grants and bus revenues will fund the Commuter Shuttle.

Projects Justification

The four projects’ charters are provided in this section, as well as project charters discussing details of several current capital projects adopted by Council in previous years that are either ongoing projects or are expected to be completed within the next several years.

197 MISCELLANEOUS CITY PROJECTS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Art In Public Places Project No.: 310330 Purpose: Administration of program, acquisition, installation, improvement, and maintenance of artwork to be displayed in the City.

Objectives: Approval of art for private development; soliciting and acquiring art for City owned property; preparation of designated locations for art installations; maintenance of art installed on City property; administration of the Arts In Public Places program.

Business Priority: Art in Public Places Program promotes the general welfare through balancing the community’s physical growth and revitalization and its cultural and artistic resources.

CIP Category: Improve Quality of Life Boundary Development project art must be approved and installed on the project property, City acquired Conditions: art is installed on City property. Private property owners will be required to enter into CCRs with the City for successor interest and public art maintenance.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Heather Stewart, Senior Management Analyst Department: Community Development Department

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional CIP Request 155,566 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 155,566

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 155,566 155,566 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 155,566 155,566 - - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Arts in Public Places Fee 155,566 155,566 CIP Funding Totals 155,566 155,566 - - - -

198 MISCELLANEOUS CITY PROJECTS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: CDBG Community Facilities Project No.: 310520 Purpose: Assist non- profit organizations with capital improvements to their facilities located in San Mateo.

Objectives: Assist local non-profits in repairs and needed capital improvements to their facilities in order to maintain service levels to low and moderate income residents.

Business Priority: Maintain services for low and moderate income residents.

CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities Boundary CDBG funding requires that financial assistance benefit low and moderate income residents. Conditions: Location: City-wide Project Manager: Sandy Council, Neighborhood Improvement and Housing Manager Department: Community Development Department, Neighborhood Improvement and Housing Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional CIP Request 100,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 100,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 100,000 50,000 50,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 100,000 50,000 50,000 - - -

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 CDBG (interfund trf) 100,000 50,000 50,000 CIP Funding Totals 100,000 50,000 50,000 - - -

199 MISCELLANEOUS CITY PROJECTS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Citywide Tree Planting – Parks Division Project No.: 610008 Purpose: To replace and replant trees lost due to development or age.

Objectives: • To maintain and increase the number of street and park trees within San Mateo. • To replace and replant trees lost due to development or old age.

Business Priority: A healthy urban forest is a high priority for the Parks Department. This project aims to protect the urban forest by continually planting new trees to replace those trees lost.

CIP Category: Improve quality of life Boundary The funding for this project comes from developer fees and permit fees designated to be spent Conditions: on the replanting of trees.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Matthew Fried, Managing Arborist Department: Parks and Recreation

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 1,009,250 Expended & Encumbered (763,268) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 245,982 Additional CIP Request 240,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 485,982

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other 240,000 75,000 45,000 75,000 45,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 240,000 - 75,000 45,000 75,000 45,000

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Tree Impact & Removal Fee 240,000 75,000 45,000 75,000 45,000 CIP Funding Totals 240,000 - 75,000 45,000 75,000 45,000

200 MISCELLANEOUS CITY PROJECTS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Citywide Tree Trimming Project No.: 610053 Purpose: To protect the urban forest and maintain safety in City streets and neighborhoods.

Objectives: To complete additional street tree trimming for all City maintained trees recommended to be pruned every seven years.

Business Priority: A healthy urban forest is an important priority for the Parks Department. During the lean budget years, the City saved money by not maintaining the recommended seven year schedule for tree trimming. This project’s funding is designated for block pruning to catch up on needed tree trimming.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary No current boundary conditions. Conditions: Location: City-wide Project Manager: Matthew Fried, Managing Arborist Department: Parks and Recreation Department

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 100,000 Expended & Encumbered Prior Yrs Budget Balance 100,000 Additional CIP Request - Total Project 5-Yr CIP 100,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other - Annual Cashflow Totals ------

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 General Fund (interfund trf) - CIP Funding Totals ------

201 MISCELLANEOUS CITY PROJECTS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: Public Education Govt CATV Access (PEG) Project No.: 210001 Purpose: To upgrade the equipment infrastructure of the City’s broadcast system that delivers video content over cable and internet.

Objectives: • Upgrade system from Analog to Digital • Install cameras in Conference Room C to broadcast study sessions • Improve presentation options for meeting broadcasts • Remodel the broadcast booth to make accessible, modify HVAC, reconfigure efficient rack space and improve sound insulation

Business Priority: Transparency in Government decision making requires the broadcast/streaming of meetings – equipment is outdated and no longer functioning to meet today’s needs.

CIP Category: Governmental requirement Boundary Council requested cameras in Conf. Rm C in 2012; Funding comes from Public/ Education/ Conditions: Government (PEG) franchise fees and is subject to restrictions on what can be expensed in this category – capital improvement to broadcast/deliver government video only – no operating may be expensed. Due to changing nature of technology – upgrades need to occur on a 5 to 7 year cycle. Work requires downtime for the Council Chambers for approximately one month. Work began in FY 2014-15.

Location: 330 W. 20th Ave Project Manager: Patrice Olds, City Clerk Department: City Council, Support Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 2,306,547 Expended & Encumbered (994,217) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 1,312,331 Additional CIP Request - Total Project 5-Yr CIP 1,312,331

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other - Annual Cashflow Totals ------

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Astound PEG CATV Impact Fee - AT&T PEG CATV Impact Fee - CIP Funding Totals ------

202 MISCELLANEOUS CITY PROJECTS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 CIP

Project Name: San Mateo Commuter Shuttle Project No.: 460930 Purpose: The purpose of this project is to promote alternate commute alternatives to reduce single occupancy vehicles on the roadway network.

Objectives: • Support the activities of the Commute.org. • Provide commute alternatives for major employers in San Mateo. • Reduce single occupancy vehicles on the roadway system.

Business Priority: San Mateo has a strong commitment to improving commute alternatives. The shuttle operated by Commute.org falls within this priority.

CIP Category: Improve quality of life Boundary The City provides partial funding for operation of these shuttles. Full funding by the users Conditions: would be the ultimate desire. Low ridership of some routes also challenges the need for the shuttle system.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Gary Heap, Engineering Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 495,810 Expended & Encumbered (478,336) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 17,474 Additional CIP Request 385,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 402,474

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other 385,000 35,000 35,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 385,000 35,000 35,000 105,000 105,000 105,000

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Miscellaneous - Shuttle Bus Revenue 70,000 35,000 35,000 State Grant - TBD 315,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 CIP Funding Totals 385,000 35,000 35,000 105,000 105,000 105,000

203

204 Capital Needs with No Funding Source Project Charters

205

206 STREETS & TRAFFIC Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Overview There are six Street & Traffic projects requiring a funding source in order to proceed, totaling $27 million. These projects would enhance public safety for residents Citywide, improve traffic congestion and provide better assurance of mitigating risks associated with accidents.

Table 4-1 Streets & Traffic Capital Projects With No Funding Source Streets & Traffic Project Costs-No Funding 5-Yr TOTAL FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Alley Improvements 2,250,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 Citywide Street Reconstruction (Future Needs) 24,000,000 - 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 Saratoga Drive Corridor Improvement Study 275,000 275,000 - - - - Traffic Controllers Cabinets 70,000 70,000 - - - - Traffic Improv – El Camino Real/Barneson Ave 500,000 500,000 - - - - Traffic Signal Improvements 89,999 25,714 25,714 25,714 12,857 - Streets & Traffic Total-No Funding Source 27,184,999 1,320,714 6,475,714 6,475,714 6,462,857 6,450,000

In order to maintain the 12 miles of alleyways and reduce the 20 miles of backlogged failed streets to a single digit, $27 million is required over the next 5 years to make an impact to our street network. Without a dedicated funding source, there will be no alley improvements and the failed street backlog will continue to grow.

Several locations have been identified by Engineering as needing studies in order to determine the most cost effective alternatives to meet the needs of both the community and the traffic issues at hand. The two most critical locations are El Camino Real at Barneson and the Saratoga Drive Corridor. Increases in traffic volumes at these locations have made the current operations of the traffic control to not operate at an optimal level. In addition, several safety improvements could be added for pedestrians and bicyclists.

The Traffic Signal Improvement Project funds ongoing improvements to the traffic signal systems throughout the City so that we may maintain consistent and efficient signal operations.

207 STREETS & TRAFFIC Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Alley Improvements Project No.: 468348 Purpose: Rehabilitate and maintain public alleys.

Objectives: • Reduce or eliminate pot holes exist on public alleys. • Maintain the service life of public alleys. • Increase PCI of public alleys.

Business Priority: The City’s Pavement Management Program does not include the inventory of our public alleys. In order to protect our asset, it is critical to maintain the conditions of these public alleys before they become failed.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary There are about 12 miles of public alleys in the City of San Mateo but maintenance of public Conditions: alleys are not funded nor included in our Pavement Management Program. It is critical to maintain these public assets in good condition.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Otis Chan, Senior Engineer Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 370,000 Expended & Encumbered (212,814) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 157,186 Additional Capital Need 2,250,000 Total Project Need 2,407,186

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 250,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Construction 2,000,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 2,250,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 2,250,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 Funding Source Totals 2,250,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000

208 STREETS & TRAFFIC Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Citywide Street Reconstruction (Future Needs) Project No.: TBD Purpose: Reconstruct failed streets and reduce the backlog of failed streets.

Objectives: • Eliminate potential claims due to pot holes exist on roadway. • Make localized base failure repairs and rehabilitate these streets with new layer of asphalt concrete. • Increase the service life of street segments for at least 15 years. • Increase PCI of these segments (<30) to 100. • Enhance the serviceability of these segments.

Business Priority: Reconstruct as many failed streets as possible and protect our asset.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary City Council has set aside General Funds of $2.5 M in 2012/13 and $2 M for 4 years to fund Conditions: failed streets. Failed streets are defined based on Pavement Management Program (PMP) having Pavement Condition Index (PCI) less than 30. The main focus of using this fund is to fix as many local streets as possible since local streets are not eligible to compete for federal and state grants. In 2013 a City study estimated it would cost $34 million to reconstruct the 19 miles of streets with a failed PCI rating. Approximately $6 million per year for four years, or $24 million, remains unfunded in order to address this community concern.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Otis Chan, Senior Engineer Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 24,000,000 Total Project Need 24,000,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 1,800,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 Construction 22,200,000 5,550,000 5,550,000 5,550,000 5,550,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 24,000,000 - 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 24,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 Funding Source Totals 24,000,000 - 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000

209 STREETS & TRAFFIC Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Saratoga Drive Corridor Improvement Study Project No.: TBD Purpose: This project will complete a study and design to improve the Saratoga Drive between E. Hillsdale Boulevard and Poinsettia Avenue.

Objectives: The study will: • Identify improvements to increase safety along the corridor. • Update existing traffic control devices. • Provide a multi-modal access.

Business Priority: This project has been identified as a high priority by the Fire Department due to two (2) accidents involving cars exiting the off ramp and crashing into the fire bay.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary The intersection of Saratoga Drive and E. Hillsdale, as well as the segment of Saratoga Conditions: between E. Hillsdale and Poinsettia, has historically had issues with safety and operation deficiencies. Although nearby development has occurred, this area has not be included in the improvements. A study is required to determine the best alternatives to address issues related operation, safety and pedestrian/bicycle access. Ideally, it would be beneficial to complete this study prior to the design of the Hillsdale Bike Pedestrian Bridge. Funding for this project has not yet been identified.

Location: Saratoga Drive between E. Hillsdale Boulevard and Poinsettia Avenue Project Manager: Tracy Scramaglia, Senior Engineer Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 275,000 Total Project Need 275,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 200,000 200,000 Construction - Other 75,000 75,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 275,000 275,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 275,000 275,000 Funding Source Totals 275,000 275,000 - - - -

210 STREETS & TRAFFIC Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Traffic Controllers Cabinets Project No.: 465631 Purpose: Funds for replacement of outdated signal controllers at various Citywide locations.

Objectives: To have current, safe, and reliable equipment.

Business Priority: This is a medium priority and needs to be completed over time.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary None. Conditions: Location: City-wide Project Manager: Ray Jackson, Public Works Field Maintenance Manager Department: Public Works Department, Maintenance Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 190,000 Expended & Encumbered (120,010) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 69,990 Additional Capital Need 70,000 Total Project Need 139,990

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 70,000 70,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 70,000 70,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 70,000 70,000 Funding Source Totals 70,000 70,000 - - - -

211 STREETS & TRAFFIC Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Traffic Improvements – El Camino Real/Barneson Avenue Project No.: TBD Purpose: This project will design and construct a left turn lane on northbound El Camino Real onto westbound Barneson Avenue.

Objectives: Improve the intersection operation and LOS.

Business Priority: This project has been identified as a high priority in order to improve traffic circulation and intersection LOS.

CIP Category: Improve quality of life Boundary This project is within Caltrans right-of-way and will require coordination. Funding for this project Conditions: has not been identified.

Location: El Camino Real and Barneson Avenue Project Manager: Tracy Scramaglia, Senior Engineer Department: Public Works, Engineering

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 500,000 Total Project Need 500,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 80,000 80,000 Construction 400,000 400,000 Other 20,000 20,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 500,000 500,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 500,000 500,000 Funding Source Totals 500,000 500,000 - - - -

212 STREETS & TRAFFIC Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Traffic Signal Improvements Project No.: TBD Purpose: Remove pedestals from traffic signals.

Objectives: To make the traffic signal poles safer when high by a vehicle.

Business Priority: Medium.

CIP Category: Improve quality of life Boundary None. Conditions: Location: City-wide Project Manager: Gary Heap, Engineering Manager Department: Public Works Department, Maintenance Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 89,999 Total Project Need 89,999

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 89,999 25,714 25,714 25,714 12,857 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 89,999 25,714 25,714 25,714 12,857 -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 89,999 25,714 25,714 25,714 12,857 Funding Source Totals 89,999 25,714 25,714 25,714 12,857 -

213

214 STREET LIGHTS & UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Overview There are two Street Lights & Utility Undergrounding projects requiring a funding source in order to proceed, totaling $1.49 million. These projects would enhance public safety for residents Citywide and would provide better assurance of mitigating risks associated with accidents related to lack of lighting or lead related illnesses.

Table 4-2 Street Lights & Utility Undergrounding Capital Projects With No Funding Source Street Lights & Utility Undergrounding Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 City Wide Lead Base Paint Abatement 583,800 116,760 116,760 116,760 116,760 116,760 Citywide Street Lights (Future Needs) 910,000 650,000 260,000 - - - Street Lights & Utility Undergrnd Total-No Funding 1,493,800 766,760 376,760 116,760 116,760 116,760

Approximately 1,400 of the 7,500 street lights are on steel poles. The majority of the steel light poles were installed and painted prior to the ban of lead-based paint in 1978. In 2008, it was brought to City's attention that the lead content on these poles exceeded the Federal limit of 0.06%. The City has since taken steps to identify the lead-based paint poles, create procedures for inspections, proper standards for remedial work, and develop an implementation plan to ultimately remove lead-based paint on all the poles.

Phase I of the lead abatement project was completed in 2010, which included removal of lead based paint on 56 high priority poles. These poles are located near schools, parks and playgrounds. The remaining funding need for the lead abatement project is $583,000. The project is currently on hold due to funding limitations.

215 STREET LIGHTS & UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Citywide Lead Based Paint Abatement Project No.: TBD Purpose: Lead Base Paint Abatement.

Objectives: Clean and repaint light poles to encapsulate. Lead Base Paint so that it can’t become a health or environmental safety hazard.

Business Priority: There has been no report health or environmental issue, however the potential does exist so this project can be done in small increments or as part of other street light projects.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary None. Conditions: Location: City-wide Project Manager: Gary Heap, Engineering Manager Department: Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 583,800 Total Project Need 583,800

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 583,800 116,760 116,760 116,760 116,760 116,760 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 583,800 116,760 116,760 116,760 116,760 116,760

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 583,800 116,760 116,760 116,760 116,760 116,760 Funding Source Totals 583,800 116,760 116,760 116,760 116,760 116,760

216 STREET LIGHTS & UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Citywide Street Lights Project No.: 463004 Purpose: This project will convert high voltage (HV) series lighting to low voltage parallel (LV) lighting. It will replace the remaining post top fixtures and florescent fixtures with LEDs.

Objectives: Enhance street light system for vehicles, pedestrians and bicycles, which will provide the following: • Improved safety for crews/residents. • Maintenance cost savings. • Energy Savings.

Business Priority: This project was approved by City Council in FY 2014-15 and is a high priority due to the age of the infrastructure and the need to make streetlights more energy efficient.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary Annual projects in this program were generated from inspections and condition assessments Conditions: performed during the previous years. This project account is also used to fund miscellaneous repairs to street lights generated from other sources such as maintenance public service requests.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Tracy Scramaglia, Senior Engineer and Ray Jackson, Field Maintenance Manager Department: Public Works, Engineering and Maintenance

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 910,000 Total Project Need 910,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 182,000 130,000 52,000 Construction 728,000 520,000 208,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 910,000 650,000 260,000 - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 General Fund (interfund trf) - Unfunded 910,000 650,000 260,000 Funding Source Totals 910,000 650,000 260,000 - - - *Preliminary Engineering costs estimated to be 20% of total project cost. Assumed consultants will be used for design.

217

218 STORM DRAINAGE & FLOOD CONTROL Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Overview The Storm Drainage and Flood Control program addresses management of storm water throughout the City to ensure storm water and surface runoff is contained within various conveyance facilities such as curbed streets, underground pipe and pumping systems, channels and creeks. It also includes the facilities needed to ensure storm water reaches the San Francisco Bay and is not trapped behind levees, resulting in ponding and flooding. Management of these systems includes inspections, studies, and condition assessments, evaluating and planning improvements, designing and constructing improvements, and periodic dredging to maintain channel capacity.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Flood Insurance Rate Map for San Mateo places portions of the City in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). Affected property owners are required to purchase flood insurance and their ability to develop or make property related improvements is significantly limited. The cost of mandatory flood insurance has recently risen to exorbitant levels and has posed a serious financial challenge for many property owners. The City is committed to implementing flood improvements to remove affected homes from the FEMA SFHA flood zone and these projects have been identified as a top priority by the City Council.

Table 4-3 Storm Drainage & Flood Control Capital Projects With No Funding Source Storm Drain & Flood Control Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Citywide Storm Sewer Improvements 2,500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 Columbia/Crystal Springs Storm Drain 270,000 - 270,000 - - - North Bayfront Levee Improvements Project 7,500,000 - 7,500,000 - - - Poplar Ave & Coyote Point Pump Stations Rehab 16,000,000 200,000 15,800,000 Storm System Dredging 500,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Storm Drain & Flood Control Total-No Funding 26,770,000 800,000 24,170,000 600,000 600,000 600,000

Project Justification

In 2002 the City completed a Flood Management Strategies study which identifies capital improvements needed to provide a level of flood protection consistent with the policies of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as administered through the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). It provides the information requested by FEMA necessary to complete the Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) process and remove San Mateo from the special flood hazard zones included in the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM). The study provides detailed evaluations of tidal flood risks from San Francisco Bay, and interior flood risks from San Mateo Creek, 16th Avenue Drainage Channel, 19th Avenue Drainage Channel, Laurel Creek, and Marina Lagoon.

Significant progress has been made toward completing proposed improvements, and in 2012 the City achieved removal or preclusion of 8,000 parcels from the special flood hazard zone in areas south of San Mateo Creek. Outboard levee and pump station improvements remain to be completed in the areas north of San Mateo Creek to protect those areas from tidal and interior flooding. Funding has been allocated for design of those projects but construction is currently unfunded as summarized in the table above. These projects are necessary to meet the City’s goal to provide flood protection and ultimately remove homes and businesses from the flood zone. Upon completion of projects north of San Mateo Creek, there are properties south of San

219 STORM DRAINAGE & FLOOD CONTROL Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Mateo Creek which will remain in the Special Flood Hazard Area due to susceptibility of creek flooding. In the 2002 report, the estimated cost of improvements needed to provide residual flood protection to these areas was $27.5 million. Resources have not been allocated to update project scopes and costs estimates for residual flood projects for areas south of San Mateo Creek due to lack of funding.

In 2004 the City completed a Storm Drain Master Plan to evaluate the possibility of flood risk due to inadequate local storm drainage facilities and identify capital improvements needed to mitigate that risk to an acceptable level. The study included development of a storm system model to evaluate capacity deficiencies and recommend improvements. The estimated value of capital improvement projects identified in the 2004 master plan is $35 million (in 2004 dollars) and is currently unfunded. The capital project funding requests above include a proposed annual funding allocation to allow development of these projects to begin, and to address areas of the system which are in urgent need of improvements as evidenced by flooding during storm events in the past decade.

Stormwater runoff is regulated under a California Regional Water Quality Control Board-San Francisco Bay Region Municipal Regional Stormwater National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit (commonly referred to as the MRP). The MRP requires Bay Area Cities and Counties to reduce trash loads from their storm drainage systems by 40% by 2014; 70% by 2017 and 100% by 2022. One control measure recognized as an acceptable means to meet this goal is installation of full trash capture devices. These devices can cost up to $500,000 per location depending on the size and type of device. Installation of a trash capture device upstream of the Coyote Point storm water pump station is being evaluated with the design of the project but is currently unfunded.

220 STORM DRAINAGE & FLOOD CONTROL Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Citywide Storm Sewer Improvements Project No.: 468004 Purpose: Rehabilitate existing storm drain system at various locations.

Objectives: Annual allocation to perform investigations, condition assessments, design, and construction of storm drain system components as needed to rehabilitate the existing system.

Business Priority: Management of the storm drain system to assure a state of good repair and sufficient capacity to convey storm water flow.

CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities Boundary This project account funds investigation of storm drain issues and rehabilitation of storm drain Conditions: facilities on an as-needed basis. Specific projects are generated from various sources including public service requests for storm drain repair/improvements. The City completed a stormwater master plan in 2004 which documents capital improvement projects to improve storm drainage throughout the City. The improvements identified have not been implemented due to the lack of a dedicated funding source for storm drainage. The estimated value of capital improvement projects identified in the 2004 master plan is $35 million (in 2004 dollars). The budget requested herein is a minimal annual allocation to address urgent rehabilitation needs.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 9,783,824 Expended & Encumbered (9,767,670) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 16,154 Additional Capital Need 2,500,000 Total Project Need 2,516,154

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other 2,500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 2,500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 2,500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 Funding Source Totals 2,500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000

221 STORM DRAINAGE & FLOOD CONTROL Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Columbia/Crystal Springs Storm Drain Project No.: 468007 Purpose: Reconstruct a drainage channel from Columbia Drive to Crystal Springs Road and the San Mateo Creek Outfall.

Objectives: Improve the operation and serviceability of the existing storm drainage system. Mitigate impacts to private property which have occurred as a result of the storm drain channel erosion over several decades.

Business Priority: Management of the storm drain system to assure a state of good repair and sufficient capacity to convey storm water flow.

CIP Category: Project avoids future additional cost Boundary The existing storm drain open channel located in an easement over private property between Conditions: 732 Columbia Drive and 771 Crystal Springs Road is significantly eroded (to a depth of about 7 feet) and in need of complete rehabilitation. To prevent further erosion and impacts to the owners’ use of their properties, the project proposes to install a pipeline within the existing storm drain channel and fill the channel to original grade. . The length of the project is approximately 500 feet and the proposed storm drain is 12-18” diameter. Preliminary design has been completed. Design will continue in FY 2014-15 under project 468004. At the February 10, 2014 City Council Goal Setting Session, this project was identified as a candidate to receive one-time funding should funds be available during the 2016-2018 Business Plan. Construction cannot begin until funds are available in FY 2016-17.

Location: Columbia Drive to Crystal Springs Road and the San Mateo Creek Outfall Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget Expended & Encumbered Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 270,000 Total Project Need 270,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other 270,000 270,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 270,000 - 270,000 - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 270,000 270,000 Funding Source Totals 270,000 - 270,000 - - -

222 STORM DRAINAGE & FLOOD CONTROL Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: North Bayfront Levee Improvements Project No.: 468305 Purpose: • Repair deficient segments of the North Bayfront Levee to meet current Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) standards for certification. • Provide tidal flood protection to approximately 1200 properties in San Mateo’s North Shoreview and North Central neighborhoods. • Remove approximately 400 properties in the North Central neighborhood from the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). • Provide adequate levee protection to limit these properties direct exposure to saltwater inundation in the event of the 100 year storm.

Objectives: The Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Flood Insurance Rate Map for San Mateo places portions of the City in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). Affected property owners are required to purchase flood insurance and their ability to develop or make property related improvements is significantly limited. The cost of mandatory flood insurance has recently risen to exorbitant levels and has posed a serious financial challenge for many property owners. The project will include raising a pedestrian/bicycle path beginning from Airport Boulevard in Burlingame, running east for approximately 1,000 feet and constructing landscape berms throughout Coyote Point Park to connect high grounds. The project would also elevate approximately 500 feet of levee south of the Coyote Point Park to meet freeboard requirements.

Business Priority: The City is committed to implementing flood improvements to remove affected homes from the FEMA SFHA flood zone. This project has been identified as a top priority by the City Council.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary Some funding for this project was authorized as an amendment to the FY 2013-14 Business Plan. Conditions: The existing allocation of $250,000 will cover design of the improvements, as well as necessary geotechnical investigation for some of the levee segments. There is currently no funding source identified for construction, estimated to cost $7.5 million. Cost estimates are currently being refined as part of the design effort.

Location: Airport Boulevard in Burlingame throughout Coyote Point Park Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 250,000 Expended & Encumbered Prior Yrs Budget Balance 250,000 Additional Capital Need 7,500,000 Total Project Need 7,750,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 7,500,000 7,500,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 7,500,000 - 7,500,000 - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 7,500,000 7,500,000 Funding Source Totals 7,500,000 - 7,500,000 - - -

223 STORM DRAINAGE & FLOOD CONTROL Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Poplar Avenue and Coyote Point Pump Stations Rehabilitation Project No.: 468201 Purpose: • Repair and rehabilitate two pump stations at Poplar Avenue and Coyote Point to meet current Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) standards for reliability and capacity and protect approximately 800 properties from residual flooding. • Fulfill trash load reduction requirements prescribed in our Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit by the installation of full trash capture devices at each pump station. • Provide residual flood protection for approximately 800 properties in the North Shoreview neighborhood. Coyote Point Pump Station Objectives: The Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Flood Insurance Rate Map for San Mateo places portions of the City in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). Affected property owners are required to purchase flood insurance and their ability to develop or make property related improvements is significantly limited. The cost of mandatory flood insurance has recently risen to exorbitant levels and has posed a serious financial challenge for many property owners. Neither pump station is equipped with automatic emergency standby power. If the pump stations were to fail, approximately 800 properties would be directly exposed to inundation in the event of the 100 year storm. The project will include upgrading pump and control equipment, seismic upgrades, constructing new structures as needed, pump station outfall and inlet improvements, provision of automatic standby power.

Poplar Pump Station Outfall Stormwater runoff is regulated under a California Regional Water Quality Control Board-San Francisco Bay Region Municipal Regional Stormwater National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit (commonly referred to as the MRP). The MRP requires Bay Area Cities and Counties to reduce trash loads from their storm drainage systems by 40% by 2014; 70% by 2017 and 100% by 2022. One control measure recognized as an acceptable means to meet this goal is installation of full trash capture devices. This project will also include installation of large end-of-pipe trash capture devices at both pump stations.

Business Priority: The City is committed to implementing flood improvements to remove affected homes from the flood zone. This project has been identified as a top priority by the City Council.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary Some funding for this project has been authorized previously. The existing allocation will cover Conditions: design of the improvements. There is currently no funding source identified for construction, estimated to be $15 million. Cost estimates are currently being refined as part of the design effort. Funding request includes annual trash capture costs of $200,000 per year.

Location: Poplar Avenue and Coyote Point Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

224 STORM DRAINAGE & FLOOD CONTROL Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 1,374,189 Expended & Encumbered (1,162,594) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 211,595 Additional Capital Need 16,000,000 Total Project Need 16,211,595

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 16,000,000 200,000 15,200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 16,000,000 200,000 15,200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 16,000,000 200,000 15,800,000 Funding Source Totals 16,000,000 200,000 15,800,000 - - -

225 STORM DRAINAGE & FLOOD CONTROL Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Storm System Dredging Project No.: 468005 Purpose: Remove mud and debris in San Mateo Creek between San Francisco Bay and South Humboldt Street to restore channel conveyance capacity.

Objectives: Preserve design capacity of San Mateo Creek for 100 year storm event.

Business Priority: This project is necessary to maintain the creek channel capacity to prevent flooding. Periodic removal of mud and debris is included in the operations and maintenance plan that was submitted with the San Mateo Creek LOMR application.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary Based on inspections performed in 2013 and recommendations from a design consultant, Conditions: sediment deposition in San Mateo Creek is likely to jeopardize the creek capacity in approximately six years. A $100,000 budget allocation from the Public Works General Fund operating budget for FY 2014-15 was approved to set aside funds for future construction of this project. Annual budget allocations were requested to continue to provide funding for the project in FY 2019-20. Design of the project was anticipated to begin in FY 2015-16. The improvements identified have not been implemented due to the lack of a dedicated funding source for storm drainage.

Location: San Mateo Creek between San Francisco Bay and South Humboldt Street Project Manager: Cathi Zammit, Clean Water Program Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 100,000 Expended & Encumbered Prior Yrs Budget Balance 100,000 Additional CIP Request 500,000 Total Project 5-Yr CIP 600,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 50,000 50,000 Construction 50,000 50,000 Other 400,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 500,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000

Funding Sources / CIP Recommendation 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 General Fund (interfund tsf) 500,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 CIP Funding Totals 500,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000

226 PARKS & RECREATION Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Overview For this report, the Parks and Recreation Department worked to identify its capital improvement needs over the next five years and prioritize them. The Department prioritized projects based on the following general criteria developed several years ago for prioritizing and funding needed capital improvements. The priorities for capital improvement funding are expected to fall within the following categories:

• To set aside funding incrementally to address needed deferred maintenance and end of lifecycle improvements.

• To insure that a system of community recreation facilities is available that meets the following goals: 1) provides appropriate and adequate spaces to meet the core programming goals of the Department; 2) improves the Department’s fiscal position; and 3) serves broad city-wide constituencies while remaining sensitive to neighborhood and geographic needs.

• To fully develop the 12 acre Bay Meadows Park consistent with the final adopted Master Plan.

• To undertake major rehabilitations within existing parks with highest priority given to expanding athletic field capacity and enhancing Central Park as the community’s signature park and link to supporting downtown vitality and economic development.

Using these criteria as a general guide, staff prioritized the projects and determined which of the priority projects could be funded with anticipated park in lieu fees. The remaining projects are in the unfunded section because the Department does not have additional resources to fund them, even though many of them fall into one or more of the priority categories.

Parks & Recreation Facilities & Buildings In addition to the projects listed in the funded and unfunded Parks & Recreation sections, the Department has many priority projects included in the City Facilities & Buildings section. The Department is responsible for supervising and programming various buildings and facilities throughout the City, while the Public Works Department is responsible for the maintenance of these facilities and buildings as part of their Facilities Division. Thus many, high priority deferred maintenance projects such as the resurfacing of Central Park and Beresford Park tennis courts, the refurbishments of park restrooms and the renovation of parking lots at places like Beresford and Shoreview centers have charters and are listed as needed deferred maintenance projects, but not in this section.

Unfunded Projects A total of $75 million in parks and recreation capital improvement projects are listed in the unfunded project section, Table 4-4 on the next page. The two main projects within this group are the construction of Bay Meadows Park and improvements at Central Park. Both of these funding amounts are estimates since the Master Plan process has not been completed for either location. The City has never adopted a Master Plan for Bay Meadows. The Department began to develop this Master Plan in 2008, but placed the process on hold during the recession. An interim park exists at the site, but the City still needs to adopt a formal Master Plan to determine the future amenities for this park. Once this Master Plan is completed, the Department will have a better estimate of the funding needed to fully develop this community park. The City did adopt a Master Plan for Central Park back in 1982, but the Department is currently in the process of

227 PARKS & RECREATION Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source updating that Master Plan to ensure that the City’s signature park meets the needs of the community into the future. Depending upon the final design of the updated Central Park Master Plan, the funding estimates for improvements at that park may change. The only component that is not likely to change is the estimate for the renovation of the play area at Central Park. The Department estimates needing about $6 million to fund the project and $1.5 million of that is currently unfunded.

The next largest group of funding is for the Laurelwood/Sugarloaf open space and the Park Play Area Upgrades project. The funding listed for the Laurelwood/Sugarloaf open space is needed to complete many of the trail and pathway improvements outlined in the Management Plan for this park land. The project costs listed in the Park Play Area Upgrades project are to renovate play areas that are beyond their lifecycle. A list of the designated play areas and their last renovation date is included in the charter for this project.

The remaining projects provide needed amenities and improvements to existing parks. The goal of the protective shade structure project is to provide additional shade opportunities at existing parks, especially at play areas, while the energy efficient lighting project would convert park and ball field lighting to more efficient stlandards. Proposed improvements within the Water Conservation in Parks project would renovate landscaping to make it more water efficient and drought tolerant while the park site amenities project provides for larger purchases of new trash cans, signs and other needed park amenities. Finally, the park field renovation project is for more significant maintenance projects at the Department’s turf fields.

Table 4-4 Parks & Recreation Capital Projects With No Funding Source Parks & Recreation Unfunded Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Bay Meadows Community Park (Construction) 35,000,000 - - - - 35,000,000 Central Park (Construction) 31,000,000 - 500,000 5,500,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 Citywide - Park Field Renovations 50,000 - 25,000 - 25,000 Citywide - Park Play Area Upgrades (Future Needs) 3,800,000 - 550,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,050,000 Citywide – Protective Shade Structures 400,000 - - 200,000 200,000 - Citywide – Water Conservation in Parks 420,000 - 15,000 190,000 215,000 - Energy Efficient Lighting Conversion 525,000 - 25,000 225,000 275,000 - Laurelwood/Sugarloaf Open Space 3,645,000 - 300,000 - 370,000 2,975,000 Park Site Amenities (Future Needs) 160,000 - 50,000 110,000 - - Parks & Recreation Unfunded Total 75,000,000 - 1,465,000 7,225,000 17,285,000 49,025,000

The charters for these 9 currently unfunded projects are provided in this section along with details about their funding history, if funded in the past.

228 PARKS & RECREATION Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Bay Meadows Community Park (Construction) Project No.: TBD Purpose: Construct the new Community Park and recommended Master Plan elements.

Objectives: • Implement/construct Master Plan for Community Park as outlined in the General Plan. • Determine role of 12 acre park in meeting the future park and recreation needs of the San Mateo community. • Make improvements to the park land as outlined in the adopted Master Plan.

Business Priority: The implementation of the Master Plan at Bay Meadows is key to the Department’s strategic planning efforts. By defining the amenities available at Bay Meadows, the Department can better plan for how to meet the demands of the growing San Mateo community at the other parks and facilities.

CIP Category: Improve quality of life Boundary The developer of the Bay Meadows project installed the current park amenities at Bay Meadows Conditions: Community Park. The City has not had an opportunity to finish the Master Plan for the park as outlined in the General Plan. The funding currently budgeted for this project is for the completion of the Master Planning process. Construction funding has not been identified for the implementation of the Master Plan which is estimated to cost between $10 and $35 million depending upon the amenities in the final Master Plan.

Location: Bay Meadows Community Park Project Manager: Sheila Canzian, Director Department: Parks and Recreation Department

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 35,000,000 Total Project Need 35,000,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - - Construction 35,000,000 35,000,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 35,000,000 - - - - 35,000,000

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Park in lieu Fees - Unfunded Need 35,000,000 35,000,000 Funding Sources Totals 35,000,000 - - - - 35,000,000 1 Preliminary Engineering Costs include the completion of the Master Plan (Project #610031). 2 Construction Costs include construction of future phases of the Master Plan and associated design costs.

229 PARKS & RECREATION Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Central Park (Construction) Project No.: TBD Purpose: Update the Master Plan for this signature community park and construct recommended park improvements.

Objectives: • Update the Master Plan for this community park, which was last adopted in 1982. • Determine role of Central Park in creating a community gathering place, creating connections to Downtown and meeting the future park and recreation needs of the San Mateo community. • Make improvements to the park as outlined in the updated Master Plan.

Business Priority: The completion of the Master Plan at Central Park is important to the Department’s strategic planning efforts. By defining the amenities available at Central Park, the Department can better plan for how to meet the demands of the growing San Mateo community at the other parks and facilities.

CIP Category: Improve quality of life Boundary The funding currently budgeted in this project is for the completion of the Master Plan process. Conditions: Funding has not been identified for the development of the Master Plan which is estimated to cost between $10 and $31 million depending upon the amenities in the final Master Plan. However, this unfunded total does not include $4.5 million in proposed park in-lieu fees to be dedicated toward the renovation of the playground that was last updated in 1994. Prior year funding in this project went to improvements projects within Central Park, including the renovation of the Japanese Garden several years ago.

Location; Central Park Project Manager: Sheila Canzian, Director Department: Parks and Recreation Department

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 31,000,000 Total Project Need 31,000,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 31,000,000 500,000 5,500,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 31,000,000 - 500,000 5,500,000 15,000,000 10,000,000

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Park in lieu Fees - - - Unfunded Need 31,000,000 500,000 5,500,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 Funding Sources Totals 31,000,000 - 500,000 5,500,000 15,000,000 10,000,000

1 Preliminary Engineering Costs include the completion of the Master Plan (Project #610027-29123). 2 Construction Costs include construction of future phases of the Master Plan and associated design costs.

230 PARKS & RECREATION Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Citywide - Park Field Renovations Project No.: 610016 Purpose: Provide for upgrades and major maintenance to athletics fields within all City parks.

Objectives: Complete major renovations to athletics fields within all City parks.

Business Priority: The Department places a high priority on providing usable fields to its youth and adult sports groups. Ongoing renovation projects are necessary to keep the fields in good condition given the high user demand.

CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities Boundary No current boundary conditions. Conditions: Location: City-wide Project Manager: Mike Blondino, Parks and Landscape Maintenance Manager Department: Parks and Recreation Department

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 444,583 Expended & Encumbered (364,497) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 80,086 Additional Capital Need 50,000 Total Project Need 130,086

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 50,000 25,000 25,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 50,000 - 25,000 - 25,000 -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded 50,000 25,000 25,000 Funding Source Totals 50,000 - 25,000 - 25,000 -

231 PARKS & RECREATION Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Citywide – Park Play Area Upgrades (Future Replacement Needs) Project No.: TBD Purpose: Maintain safe and playable play areas within all City parks

Objectives: • Maintain safety of park play areas • Install new play areas as play equipment and surfacing wears out. • Maintain 20 year replacement cycle for park play areas.

Business Priority: The Department works to provide safe, healthy and active play areas for youth in San Mateo. The best practice for doing this is to replace park play areas every 20 years. The Department currently sees a need for play area upgrades in the following parks over the next 5 years: • E. Hillsdale (last renovated 1997): $350,000; • Shoreview (last renovated 1996): $500,000; • Los Prados (last renovated 1997): $500,000; • Sunnybrae (last renovated 1994): $700,000; • Washington (last renovated 1997): $700,000; • Lakeshore (last renovated 1997): $400,000; • W. Hillsdale (last renovated1994): $250,000; • Resilient Rubber Resurfacing (Parkside, Ryder & Harborview): $400,000

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary An additional funding source is required to meet the park play area replacement policy, as Conditions: itemized above.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Dennis Frank, Landscape Architect Department: Parks and Recreation Department

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 3,800,000 Total Project Need 3,800,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 3,800,000 550,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,050,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 3,800,000 - 550,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,050,000

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Park in lieu Fees - Unfunded Need 3,800,000 550,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,050,000 Funding Sources Totals 3,800,000 - 550,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,050,000

232 PARKS & RECREATION Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Citywide – Protective Shade Structures Project No.: 610014 Purpose: Design and install protective shade structures within City parks.

Objectives: • Provide shade structures in parks in key areas including picnic areas, play areas, ballfield team enclosures, etc. • Shade structures are typically installed in conjuntion with other play area or picnic area upgrades and/or replacements.

Business Priority: Meet the demand by park users for additional protective shading within key areas of City parks as funding allows.

CIP Category: Projects that avoid future additional costs Boundary The majority of the current balance in the project is for shade structures at the new Beresford Conditions: Park play area. Future shade structures are expected to be in various City parks as part of their replacement program.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Dennis Frank, Landscape Architect Department: Parks and Recreation Department

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 346,000 Expended & Encumbered (236,000) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 110,000 Additional Capital Need 400,000 Total Project Need 510,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 400,000 200,000 200,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 400,000 - - 200,000 200,000 -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 General Fund (interfund trf) - Park in lieu Fees - Unfunded Need 400,000 200,000 200,000 Funding Sources Totals 400,000 - - 200,000 200,000 -

233 PARKS & RECREATION Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Citywide – Water Conservation in Parks Project No.: 610015 Purpose: Reduce consumption of water in parks citywide while maintaining park amenities.

Objectives: • Reduce water consumption in parks. • Increase the amount of drought-resistant and/or native plant landscaping in parks where feasible. • Maintain an efficient and effective irrigation system where needed.

Business Priority: Through greater water conservation, the Department can reduce costs and its use of water while still providing desired park amenities for the San Mateo community. The following projects are proposed in the next five years: • General irrigation replacement/upgrades: $15,000 over three years • Beresford Recreation Center frontage re-landscaping: $175,000 • Booster Pumps & Fertigation systems: $125,000 (Laurie Meadows) • Laurie Meadows Re-landscaping: $75,000

CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities Boundary No current boundary conditions. Conditions: Location: City-wide Project Manager: Mike Blondino, Parks and Landscape Maintenance Manager Department: Parks and Recreation Department

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 424,331 Expended & Encumbered (382,724) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 41,607 Additional Capital Need 420,000 Total Project Need 461,607

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 420,000 15,000 190,000 215,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 420,000 - 15,000 190,000 215,000 -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Park in lieu Fees - Unfunded Need 420,000 15,000 190,000 215,000 Funding Sources Totals 420,000 - 15,000 190,000 215,000 -

234 PARKS & RECREATION Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Energy Efficient Lighting Conversion Project No.: TBD Purpose: Upgrade and replace lighting within City parks to increase energy efficiency.

Objectives: • Study existing light standards within parks and on athletic fields. • Replace and/or upgrade lighting to improve energy usage within parks.

Business Priority: The Department maintains light fixtures within its parks pathways and on its athletic fields. The City may be able to save money and energy by converting outdating lighting to more energy efficient standards. The following projects are proposed within the next five years: Park lighting assessment & replacement: $500,000 Athletic field lighting assessment: $25,000

CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities Boundary No current boundary conditions. Conditions: Location: City-wide Project Manager: Dennis Frank, Landscape Architect Department: Parks and Recreation

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 525,000 Total Project Need 525,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other 525,000 25,000 225,000 275,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 525,000 - 25,000 225,000 275,000 -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 525,000 25,000 225,000 275,000 Total Funding 525,000 - 25,000 225,000 275,000 -

235 PARKS & RECREATION Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Laurelwood / Sugarloaf Open Space Project No.: 610012 Purpose: Implement Trail Management Plan for the Laurelwood/Sugarloaf Open Space.

Objectives: • Complete and provide for any amendments to the Management Plan. • Implement additional trail projects and restore fire breaks on Sugarloaf Mountain.

Business Priority: The Department created a Management Plan for the Laurelwood Park and Sugarloaf Mountain Open Space to preserve this unique open space. The Department continues to manage this plan to meet the needs of the neighborhood and park users. Additional funding is needed to meet the current interest of the public and specifics in the Plan: • Patrol Trail Improvements: $250,000; • ADA for ADA trail (does not include ADA trail from Upper Laurelwood Park): $300,000 • Pave Salson Trail from Upper Laurelwood Park to Belmont Border includes bridge across creek: $1,300,000 • Upgrade Tenderfoot Trail from Upper Laurelwood Park to Laurelwood Drive: $500,000; • Bridges for trails: $250,000 • Site Amenities for Trails: $100,000 • Completing Upper Laurelwood Park: $200,000 • Restoration of Fire Breaks and Establishment of Decompartmentalization Zones & Removal of Fire Prone Trees within Fire Breaks: $575,000 • Shasta Parking Lot Paving: $100,000 • Laurelwood Park interpretive panels: $70,000

CIP Category: Improve quality of life Boundary Current budgeted funding is dedicated to completion of the amendments to the Management Conditions: Plan.

Location: Laurelwood/Sugarloaf Open Space Project Manager: Dennis Frank, Landscape Architect Department: Parks and Recreation Department

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 2,530,281 Expended & Encumbered (2,474,016) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 56,265 Additional Capital Need 3,645,000 Total Project Need 3,701,265

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 3,575,000 300,000 300,000 2,975,000 Other 70,000 70,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 3,645,000 - 300,000 - 370,000 2,975,000

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Park in lieu Fees - State Grant (anticipated) 300,000 300,000 Unfunded Need 3,345,000 300,000 70,000 2,975,000 Funding Sources Totals 3,645,000 - 300,000 - 370,000 2,975,000

236 PARKS & RECREATION Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Park Site Amenities (Future) Project No.: TBD Purpose: Replace and rehabilitate site amenities within the City parks.

Objectives: Provide safe and useable amenities for park users within the City’s parks.

Business Priority: The Department wants to meet the interests of its park users in different site amenities including, but not limited to: park benches, picnic tables, BBQs, park signage, and trash cans. The following are site amenity projects recommended for the next five years: • Shoreline Parks: $50,000 • Park Entry signs: $110,000

CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities. Boundary Additional funding sources needed to provide these park improvements. Conditions: Location: City-wide Project Manager: Mike Blondino, Parks and Landscape Maintenance Manager Department: Parks and Recreation Department

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 160,000 Total Project Need 160,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other 160,000 50,000 110,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 160,000 - 50,000 110,000 - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Park in lieu Fees - Donations - Unfunded Need 160,000 50,000 110,000 Funding Sources Totals 160,000 - 50,000 110,000 - -

237

238 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Overview Improving safety, accessibility and mobility for pedestrians and bicyclists is a priority for the City of San Mateo as the City has desire to become a more pedestrian and bicycle friendly city. To do this, the City Council adopted the Bicycle Master Plan in 2011 and the Pedestrian Master Plan in 2012, and then on February 17, 2015 recommended that the Sustainable Streets Plan be incorporated into the City’s General Plan. Each of these Plans have both programmatic and infrastructure recommendations to improve the safety, accessibility and mobility of pedestrians and bicyclists.

Vision Zero Safety and protecting human life is a major priority for the City. The Sustainable Streets Plan sets a Vision Zero approach to safety with Objective 1.A stating:

Eliminate pedestrian- and bicycle-related fatalities and reduce the number of non-fatal pedestrian- and bicycle-related collisions by 50% from 2010 levels by 2020.

An analysis of the pedestrian and bicycle collisions over the last 10-year period shows that all collisions are on the rise. In 2010, the City had 2 pedestrian-related fatalities and 40 injuries of which 6 were severe injuries. However, in 2013, the pedestrian fatalities doubled to 4 and the injuries jumped to 54. In 2014, the number of collisions dropped, but are still higher than 2010.

Chart 4-1: Pedestrian Injuries and Fatality Incidents (2005 – 2014) Pedestrian Injuries Pedestrian Severe Injuries Pedestrian Fatalities 70

60 4 1 50 3 3 1 2 8 4 40 2 1 6 5 1 7 4 2 30 3 3 53 20 42 40 4 43 34 36 30 31 28 10 20

0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

In regards to bicycle related-collisions, there were less fatalities and severe injuries compared to pedestrian-related injuries. In 2010, there were 36 overall bicycle-related injuries and no fatalities. In 2014, the total number of bicycle-related collisions increased to 39.

239 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Chart 4-2: Bicycle Injuries and Fatality Incidents (2005 – 2014) Bicycle Injuries Bicycle Severe Injuries Bicycle Fatalities 60

50 3

40 2 3 2 1 4 3 30

1 48 20 38 4 34 37 37 30 33 33 10 18 20

0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

In order to meet the Vision Zero goal of eliminating traffic fatalities and reducing severe injuries, the City will be taking a number of steps including upgrading the City’s infrastructure. This chapter of the CIP budget represents the unfunded infrastructure projects and studies from the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plans, and the Sustainable Streets Plan that would improve the safety, accessibility and mobility for pedestrians and bicyclists.

The table below outlines the Bikeways and Pedestrian Paths 5-year CIP categorized by the unfunded projects which totals $163 million.

Table 4-5 Bikeways & Pedestrian Paths Capital Projects With No Funding Source Bikeways & Pedestrian Paths Unfunded Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 20th Avenue and Alameda de las Pulgas Intersection Improv 120,000 - - 120,000 - - 25th Avenue at Delaware Street Bike Box and Green Bike Lane 48,000 48,000 - - - - 3rd Avenue & Norfolk Street Intersection Improvement Project 250,000 50,000 200,000 - - - 3rd Avenue & Parrott Street Intersection Improvement Project 360,000 - 360,000 - - - 4th Avenue and Humboldt Street Improvements 17,000 17,000 - - - - ADA Transition Plan 75,000 75,000 - - - - Alameda de las Pulgas Road Diet (Barneson to Crystal Springs) 600,000 - 100,000 500,000 - - Bay to Transit Trail Feasibility Study 100,000 - 100,000 - - - Citywide Pedestrian Scale Lighting 115,200,000 23,040,000 23,040,000 23,040,000 23,040,000 23,040,000 Delaware Str at Pacific Boulevard Bicycle Left-Turn Pocket 48,000 48,000 - - - - Downtown Sidewalk Repair Program 2,750,000 550,000 550,000 550,000 550,000 550,000 Highway 92 Crossing Study 100,000 - - - 100,000 - Hillsdale / US 101 Bridge Overcrossing 33,000,000 - 3,000,000 30,000,000 - - Laurelwood/Sugarloaf Park Path Project 700,000 - - - 700,000 - Norfolk Str Road Diet (aka Norfolk Str Midblock Crossing) 240,000 40,000 200,000 - - - North B Improvement Project 200,000 200,000 - - - - Pedestrian Master Plan (North Central Ped Improv) 500,000 500,000 - - - - Pedestrian Master Plan Intersection Improvement 7,560,000 1,512,000 1,512,000 1,512,000 1,512,000 1,512,000 Sustainable Streets Plan 75,000 75,000 - - - - Wayfinding Signage Program 600,000 - 300,000 300,000 - - Wheelchair Ramp Installation in Downtown 860,000 370,000 370,000 120,000 - - Bikeways & Pedestrian Paths Unfunded Total 163,403,000 26,525,000 29,732,000 56,142,000 25,902,000 25,102,000

240 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Justification The identified projects in the table above represent recommended projects and studies from the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plans and the Sustainable Streets Plan. The largest infrastructure improvement listed in this table is the Citywide Pedestrian Scale Lighting project at $115 million. This project would install pedestrian scale lighting throughout the city on streets designated by the Pedestrian Master Plan. During the development of the Pedestrian Master Plan, lighting was identified by the community as the biggest improvement the City could make to improve pedestrian safety and increase pedestrian mobility.

Each project listed in the table above would have a different effect on improving safety, accessibility and/or mobility for the pedestrian and/or bicyclist. These effects are outlined in the purpose and objective sections of the individual Project Charters listed below.

241 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: 20th Avenue and Alameda de las Pulgas Intersection Improvement Project No.: TBD Purpose: This intersection is a key part of the route to Junipero Serra High School and Carey School. High visibility cross-walks, curb extensions, and curb ramps are recommended to improve walking conditions and meet ADA requirements.

Objectives: • Implementation of Pedestrian Master Plan Recommendation 5.6.1 – Project Sheets. • Increase pedestrian safety and travel mode share by improving the existing facilities. • Comply to current ADA requirements. • Encourage Safe Routes to School with enhanced pedestrian facilities.

Business Priority: Implementation of a recommendation in the City Council approved Pedestrian Master Plan.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary The project was conceptually designed in the Pedestrian Master Plan, but funding for the full Conditions: engineering design and construction needs to be identified.

Location: 20th Avenue and Alameda de las Pulgas Project Manager: Kenneth Chin, Project Manager II Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 120,000 Total Project Need 120,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 20,000 20,000 Construction 100,000 100,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 120,000 - - 120,000 - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 120,000 120,000 Funding Source Totals 120,000 - - 120,000 - -

242 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: 25th Avenue at Delaware Street Bike Box and Green Bike Lane Project No.: TBD Purpose: The 25th Avenue / S Delaware Street Bike Box project envisions development of a bike box at the southwest corner of the 25th Avenue / S Delaware Street intersection and a dashed green bike lane to guide bicyclists through the intersection toward northbound Delaware Street.

Objectives: • Implementation of Bicycle Master Plan Recommendation 5.2.2 – 25th Avenue at S Delaware Street Improvements. • Increase bicycle travel mode share by providing improved bicycle facilities. • Increase bicycle safety by providing improved bicycle facilities where the bicyclists are more visible to the motorists.

Business Priority: Implementation of a recommendation in the City Council approved Bicycle Master Plan.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary Coordination with the Joint Powers Board and the San Mateo County Event Center would be Conditions: required to complete the project. Additionally, the timing of the 25th Avenue grade separation may impact either the timing or design of the project.

Location: 25th Avenue at Delaware Street Project Manager: Kenneth Chin, Project Manager II Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 48,000 Total Project Need 48,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 8,000 8,000 Construction 40,000 40,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 48,000 48,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 48,000 48,000 Funding Source Totals 48,000 48,000 - - - -

243 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: 3rd Avenue & Norfolk Street Intersection Improvement Project No.: TBD Purpose: This project is designed to improve pedestrian and bicycle visibility and safety. These intersection improvements will allow pedestrians and bicycles to more quickly clear the median path waiting area and provide more visibility. Wayfinding will direct pedestrians and bicyclists to the adjacent canal Class I path.

Objectives: • Implementation of Pedestrian Master Plan Recommendation 5.6.1 – Project Sheets and Bicycle Master Plan 5.3.2 – 3rd Avenue Median Path Intersection Improvement Study. • Increase pedestrian and bicycle travel mode share by improving the existing facilities. • Increase pedestrian and bicyclist safety by providing improved pedestrian and bicycle facilities.

Business Priority: Implementation of recommendations in both the Bicycle Master Plan and Pedestrian Master Plan.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary The 3rd Avenue Median Path entrance at Norfolk Street had the highest number of bicycle related Conditions: collisions in the past five years (2003-2008). The path entrance is in the center of the roadway and requires bicyclists and pedestrians to awkwardly enter or leave the path using a number of turning movements. In order to make significant safety improvements for pedestrians and bicyclists, motor vehicle delays may increase. This project will require significant public outreach to ensure a successful project. Funding was advanced from the Bicycle Master Plan account to conceptually design the improvements, but full design, construction, and/or public outreach funding will need to be identified. Additionally, Caltrans coordination and review of the project impacts will be necessary.

Location: 3rd Avenue & Norfolk Street Project Manager: Kenneth Chin, Project Manager II Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 250,000 Total Project Need 250,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 40,000 40,000 Construction 200,000 200,000 Other 10,000 10,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 250,000 50,000 200,000 - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 250,000 50,000 200,000 Funding Source Totals 250,000 50,000 200,000 - - -

244 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: 3rd Avenue & Parrott Street Intersection Improvement Project No.: TBD Purpose: The 3rd Avenue & Parrot Street Intersection Improvement Project is designed to provide more pedestrian friendly intersections with realigned curbs and shorter crossings. Improvements also provide enhanced crossings, enlarged green space, and improved bicycle lane striping.

Objectives: • Implementation of Pedestrian Master Plan Recommendation 5.6.1 – Project Sheets. • Increase pedestrian and bicycle travel mode share by improving the existing facilities. • Increase pedestrian and bicyclist safety by providing improved pedestrian and bicycle facilities. • Improve quality of life by creating a small neighborhood pocket park.

Business Priority: Implementation of a recommendation in the City Council approved Pedestrian Master Plan.

CIP Category: Improve quality of life Boundary The 3rd Avenue and Parrott intersection has historically proved to be a challenge as Public Works Conditions: has made incremental improvements to improve overall neighborhood safety, but issues such as speeding and pedestrian/bicycle safety still persist. The overall geometric design of the intersection contributes to some of these remaining issues, therefore, as part of the project a full redesign of the intersection would need to be studied. From this redesign, a small neighborhood pocket park could be created. Project funding for this is a challenge as it will not score well on grant applications. Neighborhood input will need to be solicited and partnership with Parks and Recreation will need to occur if a pocket park is created. Overall, the project will improve the neighborhood quality of life if completed.

Location: 3rd Avenue & Parrott Street Project Manager: Kenneth Chin, Project Manager II Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 360,000 Total Project Need 360,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 60,000 60,000 Construction 300,000 300,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 360,000 - 360,000 - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 360,000 360,000 Funding Source Totals 360,000 - 360,000 - - -

245 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: 4th Avenue and Humboldt Street Improvements Project No.: TBD Purpose: The Humboldt Bike Box and Green Bike Lane project envisions development of a bike box at the southeast corner of the Humboldt Street/4th Avenue intersection and a green bike lane to guide bicyclists through the intersection and along 4th Avenue, connecting with the 3rd Avenue Median Path, which crosses Highway 101.

Objectives: • Implementation of Bicycle Master Plan Recommendation 5.2.1 – 4th Avenue and Humboldt Street Improvements. • Increase bicycle safety when traversing through this intersection. • Increase bicycle mode share by providing improved bicycle facilities.

Business Priority: Implementation of Bicycle Master Plan Recommendation 5.2.1 – 4th Avenue and Humboldt Street Improvements.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary Eastbound access to the 3rd Avenue Median Path from Humboldt Street is problematic because Conditions: Humboldt Street has a double right turn lane and bicyclists must position themselves to travel to the north side of 4th Avenue to access the median path. Funding, design/intersection geometric changes, and the potential loss of 2 parking spaces on Humboldt need to be addressed.

Location: 4th Avenue and Humboldt Street Project Manager: Kenneth Chin, Project Manager II Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 17,000 Total Project Need 17,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 2,000 2,000 Construction 15,000 15,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 17,000 17,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 17,000 17,000 Funding Source Totals 17,000 17,000 - - - -

246 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: ADA Transition Plan Project No.: TBD Purpose: Develop and implement an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan.

Objectives: • Implementation of Pedestrian Master Plan Recommendation 5.2.8 – Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan. • Meet Department of Justice regulations requiring local jurisdictions to have an ADA Transition Plan. • Improve pedestrian travel mode share by identifying barriers and obstacles for individuals with disabilities, and then developing an implementation plan to correct the issue.

Business Priority: Implementation of a recommendation in the City Council approved Pedestrian Master Plan and meeting the Department of Justice’s regulations requiring local jurisdictions to have a plan.

CIP Category: Projects that avoid future costs Boundary An ADA Transition Plan is required to be developed, but currently no available funding is Conditions: budgeted for this project. Hiring of a consultant, evaluating the City’s facilities and public right of way, consulting with the disabled community, and developing an implementation plan will ensure the successful completion of the project.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Kenneth Chin, Project Manager II Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 75,000 Total Project Need 75,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other 75,000 75,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 75,000 75,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 75,000 75,000 Funding Source Totals 75,000 75,000 - - - -

247 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Alameda de las Pulgas Road Diet (Barneson to Crystal Springs) Project No.: TBD Purpose: The Alameda de las Pulgas Road Diet would increase pedestrian and bicycle safety by reducing motor vehicle travel lanes, adding Class II bicycle lanes, wider sidewalks, pedestrian scale lighting, curb extensions, high visibility crosswalks and pedestrian refuge islands.

Objectives: • Implementation of Pedestrian Master Plan Recommendation 5.6.1 – Project Sheets. • Increase pedestrian and bicycle travel mode share by improving the existing facilities. • Increase pedestrian and bicyclist safety, especially student safety at Baywood Elementary and Aragon High School, by providing improved pedestrian and bicycle facilities. • Implement a recommendation in the Baywood Elementary Safe Routes to School Walk Audit.

Business Priority: Implementation of a project in the City Council approved Pedestrian Master Plan.

CIP Category: Necessary of health and safety Boundary Conducting the road diet on Alameda de las Pulgas will require support from the Aragon and Conditions: Baywood HOA’s, Aragon High School and Baywood Elementary School. Safe Routes to School funding is available to conduct the public outreach and conceptual designs, but funding for the full engineering will to be identified.

Location: Alameda de las Pulgas, Barneson to Crystal Springs Project Manager: Kenneth Chin, Project Manager II Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 600,000 Total Project Need 600,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 100,000 100,000 Construction 500,000 500,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 600,000 - 100,000 500,000 - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 600,000 100,000 500,000 Funding Source Totals 600,000 - 100,000 500,000 - -

248 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Bay to Transit Trail Feasibility Study Project No.: TBD Purpose: To determine the feasibility of constructing a Class I pedestrian and bicycle shared use path that would connect the San Francisco Bay Trail to the Hayward Park CalTrain Station.

Objectives: • Implementation of Bicycle Master Plan Recommendation 5.3.1 – Bay to Transit Path Feasibility Study. • Increase pedestrian and bicycle mode share. • Increase pedestrian and bicycle safety by providing a fully separated path from motor vehicles. • Reduce pedestrian and bicycle to motor vehicles by providing an alternate path of travel.

Business Priority: Implementation of the City Council approved Bicycle Master Plan.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary Following the construction of Phase I (Hayward Park to Delaware) currently scheduled for Conditions: 2015, the feasibility study for Phase II will determine the full constraints of the remaining path including, but not limited to, developing a path at the rear of residential homes, police and fire access to the trail in case of emergencies, lighting concerns, creek and wildlife impacts to the developing the trail, construction of a new pedestrian and bicycle overcrossing of US 101, and how to fund the full project.

In 2012, staff submitted a Caltrans Community-Based Transportation Planning grant application for the Feasibility Study Staff and scored well, however, was directly below the funding cutoff line. Following the construction of Phase I, staff will reapply to Caltrans for grant funding to develop the Feasibility Study.

Location: San Francisco Bay Trail to the Hayward Park Project Manager: Kenneth Chin, Project Manager II Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 100,000 Total Project Need 100,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other 100,000 100,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 100,000 - 100,000 - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 100,000 100,000 Funding Source Totals 100,000 - 100,000 - - -

249 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Citywide Pedestrian Scale Lighting Project No.: TBD Purpose: Installation of pedestrian scale lighting on streets designated by the Pedestrian Master Plan.

Objectives: • Implementation of Pedestrian Master Plan Recommendation 5.2.6 – Pedestrian Scale Lighting. • Increase pedestrian travel mode share and increase pedestrian safety by installing pedestrian scale lighting on streets designated by the Pedestrian Master Plan. • Require pedestrian scale lighting to be installed on private developments on the designated pedestrian scale lighting streets.

Business Priority: Implementation of a major safety improvement recommendation in the City Council approved Pedestrian Master Plan.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary The recommendation to install pedestrian scale lighting citywide is the most expensive Conditions: recommendation in the Pedestrian Master Plan at $115 Million. Project funding is the biggest hurdle as grant funding to install lighting alone will not score well on grant applications. Installation of pedestrian scale lighting has been included as a project scope item in the North Central Pedestrian Improvement Project, North B Improvement Project, and 25th Avenue Undergrounding and Streetscape Project, but the cost to include pedestrian scale lighting into these projects sometimes represent more than 50% of the original cost of the project without the lights. In addition to project funding, avoiding underground utilities and cultural resources at specific locations are necessary for a successful project. Ultimately, due to the project’s size, implementation of this recommendation will take decades to complete. It is assumed that there will be a 20% design cost. The funding for this project has been unidentified.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Kenneth Chin, Project Manager II Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 115,200,000 Total Project Need 115,200,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 19,200,000 3,840,000 3,840,000 3,840,000 3,840,000 3,840,000 Construction 96,000,000 19,200,000 19,200,000 19,200,000 19,200,000 19,200,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 115,200,000 23,040,000 23,040,000 23,040,000 23,040,000 23,040,000

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unidentified 115,200,000 23,040,000 23,040,000 23,040,000 23,040,000 23,040,000 Funding Source Totals 115,200,000 23,040,000 23,040,000 23,040,000 23,040,000 23,040,000

250 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Delaware Street at Pacific Boulevard Bicycle Left-Turn Pocket Feasibility Study and Construction Project No.: TBD Purpose: The Delaware Street / Pacific Boulevard Bicycle Left-Turn Pocket project envisions development of a bicycle left-turn pocket on northbound Delaware Street at its intersection with Pacific Boulevard.

Objectives: • Implementation of Bicycle Master Plan project G.10 – Delaware Street at Pacific Boulevard Bicycle Left-Turn Pocket Feasibility Study and Construction. • Improve bicycle travel mode share by providing improved bicycle facilities. • Improve bicyclist safety by providing improved visibility for bicyclists.

Business Priority: Implementation of a project in the City Council approved Bicycle Master Plan.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary The proximity of the Pacific/Delaware intersection to the Saratoga/Delaware intersection may Conditions: play a critical role in the project’s feasibility as the volumes and vehicle turning movements may limit the ability to install a left-turn bike box. Alternatives to the left-turn box will also need to be studied. Currently, project funds have not been identified to complete the project.

Location: Delaware Street and Pacific Boulevard Project Manager: Kenneth Chin, Project Manager II Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Years Budget - Expended and Encumbered - Remaining Budget Balance - Additional CIP Request 48,000 Total Project Budget 48,000

Project Costs 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 8,000 8,000 Construction 40,000 40,000 Other - Total Project Costs 48,000 48,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unidentified 48,000 48,000 Funding Source Totals 48,000 48,000 - - - -

251 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Downtown Sidewalk Repair Program Project No.: 465160 Purpose: This project is mainly focused on correcting sidewalk defects in the Downtown.

Objectives: • Eliminate potential claims due to un-even sidewalk and/or curb and gutter. • Provide continuous pedestrian access throughout the downtown area. • Encourage and attract pedestrian shopping in our downtown area.

Business Priority: This project is supported by the DSMA to attract and encourage shoppers to spend time in our downtown area and eliminate potential trip and fall.

CIP Category: Improve quality of life Boundary Funding for the downtown improvements used to be funded through RDA. Since RDA has Conditions: been eliminated, the funding for this project has been from a one-time Fund 28 Downtown Parking and Security fund. Funding for future projects have not been identified at this time. Project boundary is within the downtown area only.

Location: Downtown San Mateo Project Manager: Otis Chan, Senior Engineer Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 725,000 Expended & Encumbered (668,305) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 56,695 Additional Capital Need 2,750,000 Total Project Need 2,806,695

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 250,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Construction 2,500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 2,750,000 550,000 550,000 550,000 550,000 550,000

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Dow ntow n Parking Fund - General Fund (interfund tfr) - Unfunded Need 2,750,000 550,000 550,000 550,000 550,000 550,000 Funding Source Totals 2,750,000 550,000 550,000 550,000 550,000 550,000

252 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Highway 92 Crossing Study Project No.: TBD Purpose: Conduct a feasibility study to determine opportunities and challenges of a new pedestrian/bicycle overcrossing over Highway 92 near Edinburgh Street.

Objectives: • Implementation of Bicycle Master Plan Recommendation 5.3.7 – Highway 92 Crossing Study. • Increase pedestrian and bicycle travel mode share by providing an additional crossing over Highway 92. • Increase the pedestrian and bicycle safety by providing a separated path of travel for pedestrians and bicyclist from motor vehicles.

Business Priority: Implementation of Bicycle Master Plan Recommendation 5.3.7 – Highway 92 Crossing Study.

CIP Category: Improve quality of life Boundary Funding, right of way, and location are all issues that would need to be studied in this project. Conditions: Additionally, coordination with Caltrans is vital as Highway 92 is Caltrans jurisdiction.

Location: Highway 92 near Edinburgh Street Project Manager: Kenneth Chin, Project Manager II Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 100,000 Total Project Need 100,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other 100,000 100,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 100,000 - - - 100,000 -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unidentified 100,000 100,000 Funding Source Totals 100,000 - - - 100,000 -

253 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Hillsdale / US 101 Bridge Overcrossing Project No.: 465157 Purpose: Construction of a new pedestrian and bicycle overcrossing (bridge) over US 101 at the Hillsdale Boulevard interchange.

Objectives: • Increase the pedestrian and bicycling mode share by providing a safe and separate from motor vehicles crossing of US 101. • Increase pedestrians and bicyclists safety by providing a separated crossing from motor vehicles. • Implementation of General Plan Policy C 4.12, Bicycle Master Plan Recommendation 5.1.1, and Pedestrian Master Plan Recommendation 5.2.4.

Business Priority: Implementation of a General Plan Policy, Bicycle Master Plan recommendation and Pedestrian Master Plan recommendation.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary Successful completion of the Project Approval & Environmental Document (PA&ED) phase and Conditions: the Plans, Specifications & Estimates (PS&E) phase of the Caltrans Development Approval Process is necessary for the project to be completed. In order to complete the PS&E phase of the project and the actual construction, full funding of the bridge will need to be identified. To date, the progress and engineering of the bridge has relied on grant funds. Other concerns related to this project are the right of way, design, bridge type, maintenance costs and landing designs. These concerns should be resolved as the project progress through the Caltrans Development Approval Process.

Location: US 101 at the Hillsdale Boulevard interchange Project Manager: Kenneth Chin, Project Manager II Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 1,650,000 Expended & Encumbered (528,427) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 1,121,573 Additional Capital Need 33,000,000 Total Project Need 34,121,573

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 3,000,000 3,000,000 Construction 30,000,000 30,000,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 33,000,000 - 3,000,000 30,000,000 - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Measure A Half-Cent Sales Ta - SM Cnty Trans Auth Grnt-Mrs - Unidentified 33,000,000 3,000,000 30,000,000 Funding Source Totals 33,000,000 - 3,000,000 30,000,000 - -

254 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Laurelwood / Sugarloaf Park Path Project No.: TBD Purpose: The Laurelwood / Sugarloaf Park Path project is a the construction of a Class I multiuse path that serves as an important connector between the Cities of Belmont and San Mateo. The Path passes through the Sugarloaf Mountain Open Space and will provide recreational opportunities from both cities.

Objectives: • Implementation of Bicycle Master Plan Recommendation 5.1.1 – Class I Bicycle Paths and Pedestrian Master Plan Recommendation 5.2.4 – Paths. • Increase pedestrian and bicycle travel mode share by providing network connectivity. • Promote intra-jurisdictional support for improved pedestrian and bicycle facilities.

Business Priority: Implementation of City Council approved recommendations in the Bicycle Master Plan and Pedestrian Master Plan.

CIP Category: Improve quality of life Boundary Successful coordination and partnership with the City of Belmont, City of San Mateo Parks and Conditions: Recreation Department and the Fire Department are necessary in order to fully complete the path project. Funding for the project may be limited as grant funds for this type of project are rare. Furthermore, construction impacts would need to be closely monitored to limit environmental impacts, if any.

Location: Laurelwood / Sugarloaf Park Path Project Manager: Kenneth Chin, Project Manager II Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 700,000 Total Project Need 700,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 114,000 114,000 Construction 570,000 570,000 Other 16,000 16,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 700,000 - - - 700,000 -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unidentified 700,000 700,000 Funding Source Totals 700,000 - - - 700,000 -

255 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Norfolk Street Road Diet (aka Norfolk Street Midblock Crossing Improvement) Project No.: TBD Purpose: The Norfolk Street Road Diet improves the pedestrian and bicycle environment with the reallocation of roadway space and increased pedestrian and bicycle visibility.

Objectives: • Implementation of Pedestrian Master Plan Recommendation 5.6.1 – Project Sheets and Bicycle Master Plan 5.1.2 – Class II Bicycle Lanes. • Increase pedestrian and bicycle travel mode share by improving the existing facilities. • Increase pedestrian and bicyclist safety by providing improved pedestrian and bicycle facilities. • Increase motor vehicle turning movement safety into and out of the Bayside Shopping Center and Fish Market restaurant.

Business Priority: Implementation of recommendations in both the Bicycle Master Plan and Pedestrian Master Plan.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary The road diet, construction of a new Class II bicycle lane and midblock crossing were Conditions: conceptually designed in 2013. This project was put on hold when a CVS Drug Store was proposed on the adjacent underutilized parcel (south of the Fish Market) in 2014. The CVS proposal received mixed reviews at the Planning Commission and has thus not yet returned for formal approval. If the CVS Drug Store returns for formal approval, the design of this project would change to accommodate the new east-west pedestrian crossing desired lines. Additionally, project impacts the Norfolk/19th Avenue intersection would need to be studied. Partial funding is available through grant funds, but full project funding would need to be identified.

Location: Norfolk Street Project Manager: Kenneth Chin, Project Manager II Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 240,000 Total Project Need 240,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 40,000 40,000 Other 200,000 200,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 240,000 40,000 200,000 - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unidentified Grant 240,000 40,000 200,000 Funding Source Totals 240,000 40,000 200,000 - - -

256 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: North B Improvement Project Project No.: 465147 Purpose: Construction of the North B Street Improvement Initiative recommended infrastructure improvements.

Objectives: • Revitalize North B Street as a vibrant and successful business area for merchants, customers, property owners, and residents. • Construction of infrastructure improvements including pedestrian scale lighting, curb extensions, a midblock crosswalk, landscaping, and ADA curb ramps to improve safety and attract patrons to North B Street. • Implementation of Pedestrian Master Plan Recommendation 5.6.2.

Business Priority: Implementation of a City Council approved initiative to improve North B Street.

CIP Category: Improve quality of life Boundary The infrastructure improvements have been divided into 4 phases to accommodate the holiday Conditions: moratorium schedule and the eventual construction of the Mi Rancho Market. Phase I included the construction of curb extensions and crosswalks at the North B and Tilton intersection. The construction of this phase was advanced to avoid the Downtown holiday construction moratorium. Phases II, III and IV include the installation of pedestrian scale lighting and landscaping along North B, sidewalk improvements along Baldwin and intersection improvements at the Baldwin and North B Street, and Phase IV includes a new midblock crosswalk in front of the new Mi Rancho Market. The completion of Phase IV will depend on the construction schedule of the new Mi Rancho Market which is tentatively scheduled to break ground sometime in 2015. Phase II, III and IV are at the 75% design phase with 100% design expected in February. Additional public outreach is needed for the lighting and landscaping improvements on North B Street as well as the new sidewalk improvements on Baldwin. Staff will begin this public outreach in March 2015.

Location: North B Street Project Manager: Kenneth Chin, Project Manager Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 400,000 Expended & Encumbered (34,433) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 365,567 Additional Capital Need 200,000 Total Project Need 565,567

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 200,000 200,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 200,000 200,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Traffic Impact Fee - General Fund (interfund tfr) - Unfunded Need 200,000 200,000 Funding Source Totals 200,000 200,000 - - - - *Construction Management cost assumed to be 5% of total Construction Estimate.

257 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Pedestrian Master Plan (North Central Pedestrian Improvement) Project No.: 465150 Purpose: The purpose of the North Central Pedestrian Improvement Project is to improve the pedestrian infrastructure in the North Central neighborhood of San Mateo.

Objectives: • Implementation of the North Central Community-Based Transportation Plan, Pedestrian Master Plan and Pedestrian Safety Assessment’s Recommendations • Install pedestrian scale lighting along Delaware, Humboldt, and Monte Diablo to increase pedestrian safety and mobility • Installation of pedestrian intersection infrastructure improvements to increase pedestrian safety • Implementation of a Lifeline and One Bay Area Grants.

Business Priority: Implements recommendations from a City Council accepted North Central Community-Based Transportation Plan and an approved Pedestrian Master Plan.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary The project is partially funded by a $300k Lifeline grant and a $1.0 Million One Bay Area grant. Conditions: Construction obligation is scheduled to be received by Caltrans in January 2015 with actual construction tentatively scheduled for the Spring 2015. Full completion of the North Central Pedestrian Improvement Project will depend on the actual construction costs, but early estimates appear that the project may need an additional $400-500k to complete the full project. The additional funds are due to not receiving the full amount requested in the Lifeline grant and the increased number of street light poles to meet the standard lighting levels. Additional funds are requested to complete the project and increase the pedestrian, bicycle and motor vehicle safety in the North Central neighborhood.

Location: North Central neighborhood of San Mateo Project Manager: Kenneth Chin, Project Manager II Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 1,938,060 Expended & Encumbered (583,326) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 1,354,734 Additional Capital Need 500,000 Total Project Need 1,854,734

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 500,000 500,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 500,000 500,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Measure A Half-Cent Sales Tax - General Fund (interfund tfr) - Unfunded Need 500,000 500,000 Funding Source Totals 500,000 500,000 - - - -

258 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Pedestrian Master Plan Intersection Improvement Project No.: TBD Purpose: To improve pedestrian safety by upgrading the pedestrian infrastructure at the intersections identified by the Pedestrian Master Plan Walk Audits.

Objectives: • Implementation of Pedestrian Master Plan Recommendation 5.6.2 – Walking Audit Recommendations. • Increase pedestrian safety and travel mode share by improving the existing facilities. • Comply to the current ADA standards. • Coordinate with the DSMA, Caltrans and the County Health Department to complete the recommended upgrades.

Business Priority: Implementation of a recommendation in the City Council approved Pedestrian Master Plan.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary The Walk Audit recommendations consist of upgrading over 20 intersections citywide, however Conditions: some of the intersections have been incorporated into other projects. For the approximately 13 intersections that are not included in other projects, project funding has not been identified. At an average cost of $300k for each intersection upgrade plus design costs, funding will be the major challenge. Additionally, each intersection will have its own design and coordination issues from dealing with Caltrans (for El Camino intersections) or coordinating with the DSMA for Downtown. Implementation of this project will most likely occur over the next decade due to its size and the number of intersections that need upgrading, but in the end pedestrian safety will be greatly improved when the project is completed. Funding for these projects has not yet been identified but is expected to come from a variety of sources including various grants.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Kenneth Chin, Project Manager II Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 7,560,000 Total Project Need 7,560,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 1,260,000 252,000 252,000 252,000 252,000 252,000 Construction 6,300,000 1,260,000 1,260,000 1,260,000 1,260,000 1,260,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 7,560,000 1,512,000 1,512,000 1,512,000 1,512,000 1,512,000

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unidentified 7,560,000 1,512,000 1,512,000 1,512,000 1,512,000 1,512,000 Funding Source Totals 7,560,000 1,512,000 1,512,000 1,512,000 1,512,000 1,512,000

259 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Sustainable Streets Plan Project No.: 465158 Purpose: Development of the Sustainable Streets Plan.

Objectives: • Implementation of a Caltrans Community-Based Transportation Planning Grant by the end of February 2015 to develop the Sustainable Streets Plan. • Implementation of Bicycle Master Plan Recommendation 5.1.10 – Complete Streets Policy. • Integrate Complete Streets and Green Streets throughout the City’s normal operating procedures and policies. • Assist with the General Plan Land Use and Circulation Element updates to incorporate the Sustainable Streets Plan recommendations.

Business Priority: Implementation of Sustainable Streets Plan. The Plan is projected to be accepted by the City Council on February 17, 2015.

CIP Category: Improve quality of life Boundary In order to implement the Sustainable Streets Plan following the completion of the Caltrans Conditions: Community-Based Transportation Grant in February 2015, staff is requesting $75k in the upcoming 2015-2016 fiscal year. These funds will assist in implementing the Sustainable Streets Plan recommendations and provide staff a project to charge it’s time to when working with the Planning Division on the upcoming General Plan Elements updates.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Kenneth Chin, Project Manager II Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 534,000 Expended & Encumbered (540,381) Prior Yrs Budget Balance (6,381) Additional Capital Need 75,000 Total Project Need 68,619

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other 75,000 75,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 75,000 75,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Measure A Half-Cent Sales Ta - General Fund (interfund tfr) - Unfunded Need 75,000 75,000 Funding Source Totals 75,000 75,000 - - - -

260 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Wayfinding Signage Program Project No.: TBD Purpose: Design, fabrication and installation of Bicycle Wayfinding signs on the City’s Bikeways Network. Objectives: • Implementation of Bicycle Master Plan Recommendation 5.1.7 – Wayfinding Signage. • Increase bicycle travel mode share by prominently identifying bicycle routes and desired locations. • Increase bicycle safety by alerting motorist of the bicycle routes and the expectation that bicyclist will be on the road.

Business Priority: Implementation of Bicycle Master Plan Recommendation 5.1.7 – Wayfinding Signage.

CIP Category: Improve quality of life Boundary A Bicycle Wayfinding Memo was produced and presented to the Public Works Commission in Conditions: 2014 for input and direction. At this time, the PWC was open to the design and installation of a nonstandard signs with direction that staff should work with the California Traffic Control Device Commission to get an exception for the installation of nonstandard signs. In 2015, Caltrans endorsed (not adopted) the NACTO Bikeway Design Guidelines, which allows for additional wayfinding signage options. Staff expects Caltrans to adopt the NACTO guidelines in 2015 as an alternative to the CAMUTCD. When this adoption occurs, staff will be able avoid the experimental process and proceed with a NACTO compliant wayfinding signs. Outside of the guidelines compliance issue, funding and location of the new signs will be an issue. Staff is currently working on determining the number and location of the new signs.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Kenneth Chin, Project Manager II Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 600,000 Total Project Need 600,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 600,000 300,000 300,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 600,000 - 300,000 300,000 - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unidentified 600,000 300,000 300,000 Funding Source Totals 600,000 - 300,000 300,000 - -

261 BIKEWAYS & PEDESTRIAN PATHS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Wheelchair Ramp Installation in Downtown Project No.: TBD Purpose: The purpose of this project is to install current curb ramps to provide continue passage throughout the downtown area.

Objectives: • Install curb ramps to meet ADA compliance at all corners. • Provide continuous pedestrian access and enhance the pedestrian serviceability of the downtown neighborhood.

Business Priority: As part of the ongoing effort and meet our aging population, the city is stride to achieve ADA compliance at all intersections. Installing curb cuts at intersection will address this demand.

CIP Category: Necessary to maintain quality of life Boundary Funding for this project will be from DSMA and project limits are within the downtown area Conditions: only. Other than the DSMA, no City funding for this project has been identified.

Location: Downtown San Mateo Project Manager: Otis Chan, Senior Engineer Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 860,000 Total Project Need 860,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 120,000 50,000 50,000 20,000 Construction 740,000 320,000 320,000 100,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 860,000 370,000 370,000 120,000 - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unidentified 860,000 370,000 370,000 120,000 Funding Source Totals 860,000 370,000 370,000 120,000 - -

262 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Overview During FY 2013-2014 Public Works engaged a consultant to perform extensive assessment of San Mateo owned buildings and parks. The result of this assessment included substantial deficiencies in City owned properties including code violations related to health and safety, current building codes as well as Americans with Disabilities Act codes. In addition there are several items of “deferred maintenance” that are of significant scope requiring a project in order to fund adequate maintenance. The most significant portion of the funding request is the allocation of funds to re-locate the Corporate Yard for Public Works and Park Maintenance.

Table 4-6 City Facilities & Buildings Capital Project With No Funding Source Facilities & Building Unfunded Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 ADA Facility Improvements, City-wide 830,000 170,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 - Beresford Recreation Center Parking Lot Repair 150,000 150,000 - - - - Beresford Recreation Court Tennis Courts Re-surfacing 100,000 100,000 - - - - Central Park Tennis Courts Resurfacing 1,125,000 100,000 1,025,000 - - - City Hall 20th Ave Metal Roof Replacement 50,000 50,000 - - - - Corporate Yard Facility, New 26,500,000 100,000 250,000 350,000 350,000 25,450,000 Corporate Yard-Fleet Shop Improvements 300,000 300,000 - - - - Fiesta Meadows Park Parking Lots Renovation 100,000 - 100,000 - - - Fire Station 25 Bathroom Replacement 95,000 50,000 45,000 - - - Fire Station 27 Bathroom Replacement 145,000 145,000 - - - - Fire Station 27 Earthquake Evaluation 20,000 20,000 - - - - Fire Station 27 Earthquake Upgrades 500,000 500,000 - - - - J. Hart Clinton Drive Median Re-Landscaping 200,000 200,000 - - - - Japanese Garden Fencing Renovation 250,000 - 250,000 - - - Los Prados Park Building Refurbishment 75,000 75,000 - - - - Los Prados Park Parking Lots Renovation 500,000 - 500,000 - - - Los Prados Park Tennis and Basketball Courts Re-surfacing 331,540 331,540 - - - - New Building Component Replacement (Additional Needs) 2,950,000 590,000 590,000 590,000 590,000 590,000 Park Pathways Upgrades 500,000 - - 500,000 - - Parkside Acquatic Docks Renovation 100,000 - 100,000 - - - Parkside Aquatics Interior Restrooms Refurbishment 75,000 75,000 - - - - Shoreview Parking Lot and Pathways Replacement 250,000 250,000 - - - - Facilities & Building Unfunded Total 35,146,540 3,206,540 3,080,000 1,660,000 1,160,000 26,040,000

Project Justification In FY 2013-14, an independent Life Cycle Cost assessment study was commissioned by the Public Works Department that identified a significant level of unfunded deferred maintenance amongst the City’s many facilities and buildings. Based on this recent assessment, an annual funding level of $1.0 million was recommended for needs meeting this ongoing project’s criteria, leaving a balance of $590,000 annually without a funding source. Additionally, numerous larger deferred maintenance projects identified in the assessment also remain unfunded. This section includes capital project charters for all of these identified needs. The following are summaries of the larger project need.

ADA Facility Improvements Most of the city facilities are lacking ADA accessibility per current code. Failure to make repairs/improvements to comply with ADA accessibility codes places the city at risk of liability and litigation for failure to comply.

263 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

New Building Component Replacement (Additional Needs) The project requests increase to existing funding to build a balance to provide adequate funding for anticipated major repairs and replacements to current aging equipment. The funding level was recommended by independent consultant.

Corporate Yard Fleet Shop Improvements These are improvements required to maintain new Compressed Natural Gas vehicles which will be purchased for delivery in Jan-April 2016.

Corporate Yard Facility New Funding is to build of new Corporate Yard in order to vacate Pacific Ave. property which has been re-zoned for high-density residential/retail.

All other projects are proposed to mitigate deferred maintenance or address health and safety concerns.

264 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: ADA Facility Improvements, City-wide Project No.: TBD Purpose: Throughout the City, facilities need to be upgraded for Americans with Disabilities Act compliance.

Objectives: • Bring buildings into ADA compliance City Hall Lakeshore • Bring pathways and path of travel into ADA compliance. • Bring parking lots and path of travel from parking stalls to the facilities into ADA compliance.

Beresford Rec Center Marina Library

Business Priority: The City of San Mateo currently has some facilities that still require remodeling to bring them into full ADA compliance. The ADA requirements have changed over the years and the older facilities need to be addressed. The primary concern is meeting the needs of the public, however additional concern is potential liability for failure to comply to ADA codes. CIP Category: Improve quality of life Boundary The City has had all of its facilities assessed and the report prepared by VFMC identified the Conditions: ADA projects. Based on programs and building functions, the ADA improvements will be phased throughout the City over a period of 3-4 years.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: David Fink, Facilities and Fleet Manager/Gogo Heinrich, Project Manager Department: Public Works Department, Facilities & Fleet Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 830,000 Total Project Need 830,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 80,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Construction 750,000 150,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 830,000 170,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 830,000 170,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 Funding Source Totals 830,000 170,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 -

265 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Beresford Recreation Center Parking Lot Renovation Project No.: TBD Purpose: To fully repair, resurface and restripe all three parking lots at Beresford Park.

Objectives: Provide safe parking areas for public use. Maintain infrastructure (current poor conditions will continue to cause further damage to sub-surface as well as asphalt surface). Re-stripe and re-structure to meet all current ADA requirements for accessible parking and path of travel.

Business Priority: The parking surfaces have not been maintained in more than 15-20 years in some areas. Some surfaces are so badly cracked and damage as water is now penetrating into subsurface and creating additional damage. ADA parking is not to current code nor is the ADA path of travel. ADA concerns create a liability issue as does the poor condition of the parking area creating significant trip hazards.

CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities Boundary Work will proceed through normal city policies related to contract selection and award. Work Conditions: should be conducted to coincide with other park projects.

Location: Beresford Recreation Center Project Manager: David Fink, Facilities and Fleet Manager Department: Public Works Department, Facilities Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 150,000 Total Project Need 150,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 150,000 150,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 150,000 150,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 150,000 150,000 Funding Source Totals 150,000 150,000 - - - -

266 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Beresford Recreation Center Court Tennis Courts Re-surfacing Project No.: TBD Purpose: Re-surface deteriorated tennis courts.

Objectives: • Provide patrons with a safe and somewhat aesthetically pleasing court on which to play. • Eliminate the threat of having to close off courts due to safety concerns. • These courts receive extensive play and have a vocal and concerned patronage

Business Priority: The City of San Mateo provides tennis court facilities for the public. Patrons pay for classes that are given by Parks and Rec on these tennis courts.

CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities Boundary Final selection of re-surface materials will require approval from Parks & Rec. The re-surface Conditions: work needs to be scheduled around the classes and court usage. Notification to the public for the temporary closure needs to be provided.

Location: Beresford Recreation Center Project Manager: David Fink, Facilities and Fleet Manager Department: Public Works Department, Facilities Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 100,000 Total Project Need 100,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 100,000 100,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 100,000 100,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 100,000 100,000 Funding Source Totals 100,000 100,000 - - - -

267 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Central Park Tennis Courts Resurfacing Project No.: TBD Purpose: Re-surface/re-build deteriorating tennis courts that sit over the Central Park Parking Garage.

Objectives: • Provide patrons with a safe and aesthetically pleasing court on which to play. • Eliminate the threat of having to close-off courts due to safety concerns. • Eliminate the water damage to the parking structure that is a result of the cracks and poor drainage from the tennis courts.

Business Priority: The City of San Mateo provides tennis court facilities for the public. Patrons pay for classes that are given by Parks and Rec on these tennis courts.

CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities Boundary Initial funding request of $100,000 in FY 2015-16 is for resurfacing the tennis courts to allow for Conditions: safe and payable courts until funding for a long-term fix is identified. The request of $1,025 M in FY 2016-17 is for a long-term solution to the courts’ capital needs.

Final selection of re-surface/re-building materials will require approval from Parks & Rec. The recommended process is to take the court surface down to the concrete slab, grind the slab, and add a post-tensioned concrete slab on top. Place a new tennis court surface system that includes integral drainage on top of the parking structure and replace the lights, fencing and nets. This is a long-term fix.

Location: Central Park Tennis Courts Project Manager: David Fink, Facilities and Fleet Manager/Gogo Heinrich, Project Manager Department: Public Works Department, Facilities Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 1,125,000 Total Project Need 1,125,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 25,000 25,000 Construction 1,100,000 100,000 1,000,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 1,125,000 100,000 1,025,000 - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 1,125,000 100,000 1,025,000 Funding Source Totals 1,125,000 100,000 1,025,000 - - -

268 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: City Hall 20th Ave Metal Roof Replacement Project No.: TBD Purpose: Remove the metal roof which is located on the South or 20th avenue side of the building. Replace roof with an open metal louver shade insert.

Objectives: Alleviate a maintenance problem and potential safety hazard steel roof (awning type structure) and replace with a low maintenance louver structure which will keep the ascetics of building design while providing light diffusion without capturing tree debris.

Business Priority: Concerns related to this structure are not of an imminent nature. The tree debris which has built up over many years and is very difficult to clear creates a strain on the roof panels which could collapse during heavy rain. However, while there are some safety concerns they are not significant as roof failure would be external to the building and not part of any building access.

CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities Boundary Work will proceed through normal city policies related to contract selection and award. Conditions: Location: 330 W. 20th Avenue Project Manager: David Fink, Facilities and Fleet Manager Department: Public Works Department, Facilities Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 50,000 Total Project Need 50,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 50,000 50,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 50,000 50,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 50,000 50,000 Funding Source Totals 50,000 50,000 - - - -

269 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Corporation Yard Facility, New Project No.: 461002 Purpose: The existing Corporation Yard for the City of San Mateo is located at 1949-2001 Pacific Boulevard in the central part of the city on an approximate 5.2 acre parcel of land. The Public Works and Parks and Recreation departments currently occupy the existing yard. Functions currently located at the yard include sewer collection; street and traffic maintenance; building maintenance; fleet maintenance; purchasing and receiving warehouse; landscape maintenance; and related administrative staff. The City is looking to relocate its yard functions to 6.2 acres of land still owned by the City located on the eastern part of the city adjacent to the City’s Waste Water Treatment Plant on Detroit Drive.

Objectives: Relocate the Corporation Yard from its currently zoned Transit Oriented Development site to an alternative site.

Business Priority: The existing corporation yard has been re-zoned Transit Oriented Development and is now surrounded by residences and commercial establishments. The facilities are old and inefficient and it was deemed prudent to move the entire operation to another site.

CIP Category: Improve quality of life Boundary The existing Wastewater Treatment Plant will be undergoing major renovations and expansion. Conditions: The current plan is to co-locate the corporation yard with the WWTP facilities. The current estimate for the entire project is $80M, of which $30M is budgeted beyond FY 2019-20 for the WWTP equalization basin of which is budgeted in a separate project charter in the Sewer. Between this charter and the related charter in the Sewer section, there is an additional $24 million non-sewer unfunded need beyond FY 2019-20.

Location: 1949-2001 Pacific Boulevard Project Manager: Gogo Heinrich, Project Manager Department: Public Works Department, Facilities & Fleet Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 242,976 Expended & Encumbered (170,384) Prior Yrs Budget Balance 72,592 Additional Capital Need 26,500,000 Total Project Need 26,572,592

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 1,200,000 100,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 350,000 Construction 25,000,000 25,000,000 Other 300,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 26,500,000 100,000 250,000 350,000 350,000 25,450,000

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Sew er (interfund trf) - - General Fund (interfund trf) - - Fleet & Bldg Maint (interfund tfr) - - Unfunded Need 26,500,000 100,000 250,000 350,000 350,000 25,450,000 Funding Source Totals 26,500,000 100,000 250,000 350,000 350,000 25,450,000

270 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Corp Yard, Fleet Shop Improvements Project No.: TBD Purpose: Improve working and operation conditions and comply with SWPPP by installing a cover over debris area and Raw materials area. Upgrade Fleet shop to accommodate Compressed Natural Gas powered vehicles, Improve Corp Yard Security and safety.

Objectives: Extend the life of the Corp Yard during implementation of master plan which will require use of current yard for up to ten or more years. Provide for improved working conditions and more effective containment of debris and protect raw materials (sand etc.). Provide shop equipment required for new CNG vehicles scheduled to be purchased in 2015/16 and improve the security and safety of the Corp. Yard by improving vehicle gates, adding security alarms to two buildings and installing security cameras in key zones and installing an emergency generator.

Business Priority: High CIP Category: Major services and equipment replacement Boundary None. Conditions: Location: 1949-2001 Pacific Boulevard Project Manager: Co-managed by Ray Jackson and David Fink, Facilities and Fleet Manager Department: Public Works Department, Maintenance Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 300,000 Total Project Need 300,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 300,000 300,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 300,000 300,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 300,000 300,000 Funding Source Totals 300,000 300,000 - - - -

271 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Fiesta Meadows Park Parking Lots Renovation Project No.: TBD Purpose: To fully repair, resurface and restripe Fiesta Meadows parking lots.

Objectives: Provide safe parking areas for public use. Maintain infrastructure (current poor conditions will continue to cause further damage to sub-surface as well as asphalt surface). Re-stripe and re-structure to meet all current ADA requirements for accessible parking and path of travel.

Business Priority: The parking surfaces have not been maintained in more than 15-20 years in some areas. Some surfaces are so badly cracked and damage as water is now penetrating into subsurface and creating additional damage. ADA parking is not to current code nor is the ADA path of travel.

CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities Boundary Work will proceed through normal city policies related to contract selection and award. Conditions: Location: Fiesta Meadows Park Project Manager: David Fink, Facilities and Fleet Manager Department: Public Works Department, Facilities Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 100,000 Total Project Need 100,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 100,000 100,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 100,000 - 100,000 - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 100,000 100,000 Funding Source Totals 100,000 - 100,000 - - -

272 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Fire Station 25 Bathroom Replacement Project No.: TBD Purpose: Remodel the existing bathroom. Objectives: • Bring the bathroom that was built in the 1950’s up to current codes. • Create a bathroom to accommodate both male and female firefighters. • Replace vintage fixtures and equipment that are beyond their useful life. • Replace HVAC, plumbing and electrical equipment for energy efficiency.

Business Priority: The fire department has male and female firefighters and all stations need to have accommodations for both. Remodeling the fire station restrooms will also bring the facilities into code compliance.

CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities Boundary Project must be completed while the station is in operation. Conditions: Location: Fire Station 25 Project Manager: David Fink, Facilities and Fleet Manager/Gogo Heinrich, Project Manager Department: Public Works Department, Facilities Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 95,000 Total Project Need 95,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 5,000 5,000 Construction 90,000 45,000 45,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 95,000 50,000 45,000 - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 95,000 50,000 45,000 Funding Source Totals 95,000 50,000 45,000 - - -

273 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Fire Station 27 Bathroom Replacement Project No.: TBD Purpose: Remodel the existing bathroom which currently consists of separate areas for sinks, toilets, and showers.

Objectives: • Bring the bathroom that was built in 1971 up to current codes. • Create bathroom facilities to accommodate both male and female firefighters. • Replace vintage fixtures and equipment that are beyond their useful life. • Replace HVAC, plumbing, and electrical equipment for energy efficiency.

Business Priority: The fire department has male and female firefighters and all stations need to have accommodations for both. Remodeling the fire station bathrooms will also bring the facilities into code compliance.

CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities Boundary Project must be completed while the station is in operation. Conditions: Location: Fire Station 27 Project Manager: David Fink, Facilities and Fleet Manager/Gogo Heinrich, Project Manager Department: Public Works Department, Facilities Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 145,000 Total Project Need 145,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 145,000 145,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 145,000 145,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 145,000 145,000 Funding Source Totals 145,000 145,000 - - - -

274 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Fire Station 27 Earthquake Evaluation Project No.: TBD Purpose: Fire Station 27 was built in 1971. Due to the age of construction, settlement of the building, and the visual inspection of the unsupported hillside, a structural and seismic evaluation is recommended.

Objectives: • Provide a seismic evaluation for the building and the site. • The evaluation needs to provide recommendations for improvements and code compliance. • The evaluation needs to provide schedule and cost estimates for each of the recommendations.

Business Priority: Fire stations are designated as essential facilities and require higher standards and more stringent codes for life/safety.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary Evaluations can be performed while the station is in operation. Conditions: Location: Fire Station 27 Project Manager: David Fink, Facilities and Fleet Manager/Gogo Heinrich, Project Manager Department: Public Works Department, Facilities Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 20,000 Total Project Need 20,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 20,000 20,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 20,000 20,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 20,000 20,000 Funding Source Totals 20,000 20,000 - - - -

275 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Fire Station 27 Earthquake Upgrades Project No.: TBD Purpose: Upgrade the structure and non-conforming components for seismic safety.

Objectives: • Provide seismic bracing for the structure. • Provide seismic improvements for the site. • Replace building components that do not meet seismic codes (such as the single pane sliding doors in the exercise/day room.

Business Priority: Bring the fire station into compliance for life/safety as an essential facility.

CIP Category: Necessary for health and safety Boundary The work required for this project is unknown until the earthquake study is completed. Conditions: Depending on the scope of work, the work at the station may have to be phased or the firefighters temporarily relocated during construction.

Location: Fire Station 27 Project Manager: David Fink, Facilities and Fleet Manager/Gogo Heinrich Department: Public Works Department, Facilities Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 500,000 Total Project Need 500,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 500,000 500,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 500,000 500,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 500,000 500,000 Funding Source Totals 500,000 500,000 - - - -

276 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: J. Hart Clinton Drive Median Re-Landscaping Project No.: TBD Purpose: Re-landscape median for aesthetics, ease of maintenance, and water reduction.

Objectives: • Make the very well-traveled thoroughfare more appealing. • Replace dead and dying vegetation and trees. • Replace the wasteful spray irrigation system with drip irrigation.

Business Priority: Improve the image of the City of San Mateo to travelers along this thoroughfare and reduce water waste.

CIP Category: Improve quality of life Boundary Some of the work can be performed by Parks & Rec and some of the work would be contracted out. Conditions: i.e. the irrigation work if done in-house is estimated to be around $30,000.

Location: J. Hart Clinton Drive Project Manager: David Fink, Facilities and Fleet Manager/Gogo Heinrich, Project Manager Department: Public Works Department, Facilities Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 200,000 Total Project Need 200,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 200,000 200,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 200,000 200,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 200,000 200,000 Funding Source Totals 200,000 200,000 - - - -

277 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Japanese Garden Fencing Renovation Project No.: TBD Purpose: To renovate the fence around the Japanese Garden.

Objectives: Replace the entire existing wood fence including posts and decorative fence top structure.

Business Priority: The Tea Garden is a significant city owned and maintained public facility. The fencing provides both a security boundary as well as aesthetic separation of park space, the fence structure and design are an architectural element that enhances the space. The current fence is deteriorating and requiring constant repairs. Budgeting for full replacement is required in order to maintain the overall quality of the facility. CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities Boundary Work will proceed through normal city policies related to contract selection and award. Conditions: Location: Central Park near downtown San Mateo Project Manager: David Fink, Facilities and Fleet Manager Department: Public Works Department, Facilities Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 250,000 Total Project Need 250,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 250,000 250,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 250,000 - 250,000 - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 250,000 250,000 Funding Source Totals 250,000 - 250,000 - - -

278 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Los Prados Park Building Refurbishment Project No.: TBD Purpose: Provide refurbishing and alterations to building structure to maintain facility, provide additional equipment storage access and enhance overall public experience for users of the park.

Objectives: Replace old and leaking roof re-rout roof drains. Repair/replace dry-rot wood. Install larger door on North side room to allow for storage of landscape equipment. Paint interior and exterior, replace plumbing fixtures and partitions as required. Re-coat floor.

Business Priority: Current condition of the building necessitates immediate attention in order to prevent additional degradation of the building. This building is the only restroom facility at the park and receives significant usage. With recent approval of field improvements (synthetic truf) and pathway improvements, the restroom building should also be upgraded to match the investment being made at this facility. CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities Boundary Work will proceed through normal city policies related to contract selection and award. Project Conditions: should coincide with other plan park improvements or be completed prior.

Location: Los Prados Park Project Manager: David Fink, Facilities and Fleet Manager Department: Public Works Department, Facilities Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 75,000 Total Project Need 75,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 75,000 75,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 75,000 75,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 75,000 75,000 Funding Source Totals 75,000 75,000 - - - -

279 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Los Prados Park Parking Lots Renovation Project No.: TBD Purpose: To fully repair, resurface and restripe Los Prados Park parking lots.

Objectives: Provide safe parking areas for public use. Maintain infrastructure (current poor conditions will continue to cause further damage to sub-surface as well as asphalt surface). Re-stripe and re-structure to meet all current ADA requirements for accessible parking and path of travel.

Business Priority: The parking surfaces have not been maintained in more than 15-20 years in some areas. Some surfaces are so badly cracked and damage as water is now penetrating into subsurface and creating additional damage. ADA parking is not to current code nor is the ADA path of travel. With current investment in park infrastructure (new field surface and pathways) it is incumbent on the city to provide proper ADA pathway and marking. Repair and renovation of the asphalt surface is needed in order to properly execute ADA upgrades.

CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities Boundary Work will proceed through normal city policies related to contract selection and award. Conditions: Location: Los Prados Park Project Manager: David Fink, Facilities and Fleet Manager Department: Public Works Department, Facilities Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 500,000 Total Project Need 500,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 500,000 500,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 500,000 - 500,000 - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 500,000 500,000 Funding Source Totals 500,000 - 500,000 - - -

280 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Los Prados Park Tennis and Basketball Courts Re-surfacing Project No.: TBD Purpose: Re-surface tennis and basketball courts

Objectives: • Provide patrons with safe and somewhat aesthetically pleasing courts on which to play. • Eliminate the threat of having to close off courts due to safety concerns. • Replace lighting and fencing.

Business Priority: The City of San Mateo provides tennis and basketball courts for neighborhood parks. The facilities need to be safe. With significant investment being made to this park in the form of field replacement and pathway improvements, this portion of the facility should also receive upgrade.

CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities Boundary Re-surface materials will require approval from Parks & Rec. The re-surface work needs to be Conditions: scheduled around court usage. Notification to the public for temporary closures needs to be provided.

Location: Los Prados Park Project Manager: David Fink, Facilities and Fleet Manager and Gogo Heinrich, Project Manager Department: Public Works Department, Facilities Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 331,540 Total Project Need 331,540

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 331,540 331,540 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 331,540 331,540 - - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 331,540 331,540 Funding Source Totals 331,540 331,540 - - - -

281 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: New Building Component Replacement (Additional Needs) Project No.: TBD Purpose: Provide funding for replacement or substantial overhaul of major building components including; Environmental components (HVAC), Book Handling Machine, Flooring, Lighting, Electrical and Plumbing Components, Doors, Windows, Roofing, Elevators and other building components as required.

Objectives: Provide additional funding to meet expanded facility square footage such as Main Library, Police Headquarters and Fire Stations, 23, 24 and 26. Provide a fund balance to meet immediate need requirements for unforeseen equipment failures that impact the objectives of City managed facilities.

Business Priority: This is a critical funding source to enable the facilities team to meet the needs of both city employees and the public by effectively maintaining or replacing major building components as needed. The additional funding requirements are due to the additional square footage of new facilities put into service within the city and to prepare for replacing aging inventory. Funding level is based upon independent Life Cycle Cost assessment commissioned by the Public Works Department, Facilities Division in FY 2013-14.

CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities Boundary All encumbrances of funding must meet all established City policies related to procurement of Conditions: goods and services. Funds must be used for specific major components as established by Public Works senior management team.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: David Fink, Facilities and Fleet Manager Department: Public Works Department, Facilities Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 2,950,000 Total Project Need 2,950,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 2,950,000 590,000 590,000 590,000 590,000 590,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 2,950,000 590,000 590,000 590,000 590,000 590,000

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 General Fund (interfund trf) - - Unfunded Need 2,950,000 590,000 590,000 590,000 590,000 590,000 Funding Source Totals 2,950,000 590,000 590,000 590,000 590,000 590,000

282 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Park Pathway Upgrades Project No.: TBD Purpose: To upgrade pathways within the City’s developed parks.

Objectives: To make repairs throughout the 29 park facilities where pathways have been damaged from tree roots, erosion and other factors. Multiple parks have significant areas of concern that deferred maintenance will cause additional greater cost for repairs if delayed further as well as pose a significant safety risk to park users. The exposure of the city to liability is significant.

Business Priority: NA CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities Boundary Work will proceed through normal city policies related to contract selection and award. Conditions: Location: City-wide Project Manager: David Fink, Facilities and Fleet Manager Department: Public Works Department, Facilities Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 500,000 Total Project Need 500,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 500,000 500,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 500,000 - - 500,000 - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 500,000 500,000 Funding Source Totals 500,000 - - 500,000 - -

283 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Parkside Aquatic Docks Renovation Project No.: TBD Purpose: To replace existing docks at Parkside Aquatic Park.

Objectives: To provide safe public access to public water ways, enhance public facilities and maintain investment.

Business Priority: The current docks are in constant need of repair. Wood surface is badly cracked, warped and in some places slanted. The dock safety is questionable and posse a potential risk to the public. Floating docks of this nature have a typical useful life of 10-15 years, docks are now 15+ years old. Failure to replace in the near future may necessitate the closure of the docks for public safety. CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities Boundary Work will proceed through normal city policies related to contract selection and award. Conditions: Location: Parkside Aquatic Park Project Manager: David Fink, Facilities and Fleet Manager Department: Public Works Department, Facilities Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 100,000 Total Project Need 100,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 100,000 100,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 100,000 - 100,000 - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 100,000 100,000 Funding Source Totals 100,000 - 100,000 - - -

284 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Parkside Aquatics Interior Restrooms Refurbish Project No.: TBD Purpose: Repair all dry rot damage, replace existing interior wall covering and flooring, upgrade lighting, repair/replace plumbing fixtures and partitions as required. Repair damaged metal door jams, Paint interior and exterior.

Objectives: To provide safe efficient and low-maintenance restrooms for public use. Restore building to original exterior condition by replacing damaged siding, repairing corroded metal door jams and re-pairing.

Business Priority: Building is 15 years old but restrooms are in poor condition from inefficient original material selection, deferred maintenance and public abuse. Exterior repairs are a priority in order to maintain the integrity of the facility. Interior repairs and upgrade are to provide a more attractive restroom and reduce re-pair costs by upgrading finishes.

CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities Boundary Work will proceed through normal city policies related to contract selection and award. Conditions: Location: Parkside Aquatics Park Project Manager: David Fink, Facilities and Fleet Manager Department: Public Works Department, Facilities Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 75,000 Total Project Need 75,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 75,000 75,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 75,000 75,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 75,000 75,000 Funding Source Totals 75,000 75,000 - - - -

285 CITY FACILITIES & BUILDINGS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Shoreview Park Parking Lot and Pathways Replacement Project No.: TBD Purpose: Replace existing parking area with more functional and safer parking.

Objectives: Remove existing parking lot Design and build parking surface that meets industry standards, provides safe efficient parking and access and includes correct ADA accessible parking and path of travel. Enhance park experience for public use.

Business Priority: The current parking area is poorly designed and does not provide adequate turn-a-round space and is stripped for one way (in) parking. ADA parking and path of travel is not to code and parking surface is in very poor condition. The parking lot is used for both the park as well as for the recreation center that provides day care programs. Parking area becomes congested and unsafe during primary drop-off and pick-up times. The condition of the parking area is such that there is serious concern for liability in the event of injury at the park and emergency response is delayed due to accessibility, as well as general trip hazard concerns.

CIP Category: Maintain current investment in facilities Boundary Work will proceed through normal city policies related to contract selection and award. Conditions: Location: Shoreview Park Project Manager: David Fink, Facilities and Fleet Manager Department: Public Works Department, Facilities Division

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 250,000 Total Project Need 250,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction 250,000 250,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 250,000 250,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 250,000 250,000 Funding Source Totals 250,000 250,000 - - - -

286 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Overview There are three information technology projects requiring a funding source in order to proceed, totaling $1.0 million. These projects would enhance building safety for City employees, assist the City in meeting federal and state requirements for records retention, and would provide better assurance of mitigating risks associated with contracts the City enters into for goods, services, and other legal arrangements.

Table 4-7 Information Technology Project With No Funding Source Information Technology Unfunded Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Document Management System 500,000 - 500,000 - - - Building Access System Upgrade/Replacement 460,000 460,000 - - - - Contracts Management System 70,000 70,000 - - - - Information Technology Unfunded Total 1,030,000 530,000 500,000 - - -

287 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Building Access System Replacement Project No.: 610041 Purpose: Upgrade or replace the City’s aging building access control system. Coordinate expansion efforts of building access to Parks and Rec facilities, library branches for consistency.

Objectives: Implement a modern, reliable, and supportable building access control for all City facilities. Ensure a system that supports the expansion to new facilities that currently do not have building access control. Ensure a system that is scalable to support intrusion detection/alerting and video security in addition to building access control. Further scalability to support building climate monitoring and management as building systems are modernized.

Business Priority: The current building access system is limited in function, difficult to support, and has limited scalability and expansion potential. The system is nearing end of life and not readily upgradeable. City departments requesting expansion of the system to new facilities and better functionality.

CIP Category: Major services & equipment replacement Boundary This project requires some coordination among departments requesting BAC in new facilities. Conditions: Funding was approved for Parks and Rec expansion ($100,000). Remaining funding source from the General Fund.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Kevin McGill, Systems Analyst II Department: Information Technology, Business Consulting

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget 100,000 Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance 100,000 Additional Capital Need 460,000 Total Project Need 560,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other 460,000 460,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 460,000 460,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 460,000 460,000 Funding Source Totals 460,000 460,000 - - - -

288 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Contracts Management System Project No.: TBD Purpose: Implement a SharePoint-based contracts management system to manage City contracts with vendors.

Objectives: • Efficiently manage City contracts with vendors, including all related documents. • Coordinate and standardize City contracting processes. Automate these processes within the system.

Business Priority: There is a common City-wide interest to automate and streamline contracting processes. Of particular interest to Public Works, but important to any department with significant and numerous contracts to manage.

CIP Category: Projects that avoid future additional costs Boundary The primary boundary condition is coordination of efforts across departments, in order to gain Conditions: input and address all needs in a common system.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Peter Roth, Sr. Systems Analyst Department: Information Technology, Business Consulting

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 70,000 Total Project Need 70,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other 70,000 70,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 70,000 70,000 - - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 70,000 70,000 Funding Source Totals 70,000 70,000 - - - -

289 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Document Management System Upgrade Project No.: TBD Purpose: Migrate the SIRE document management system to a modern ECM/DMS using SharePoint. SIRE is at end of life, and the vendor has announced it will make no further enhancements. It is anticipated that an ‘end of support’ announcement is forthcoming in the next calendar year. Therefore a migration will have to occur.

Objectives: • Migrate existing static SIRE cabinets to SharePoint repository. • Design and implement scanning processes to reproduce

SIRE capture processes. • Migrate active SIRE cabinets to SharePoint, employing new scanning processes.

Business Priority: Replacement of a deprecated, end of life system with a modern solution. This follows on from prior IT and departmental work plan items to promote document management and Enterprise Content Management (ECM).

CIP Category: Major services & equipment replacement Boundary This project requires significant coordination among user departments. It requires work to Conditions: understand business process and modify as needed; to provide suitable replacement functionality that meets or exceeds existing; significant understanding of document ‘metadata’ requirements for search criteria, and finally; a funding source has not yet been identified.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Peter Roth, Sr. Systems Analyst Department: Information Technology, Business Consulting

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget - Expended & Encumbered - Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 500,000 Total Project Need 500,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering - Construction - Other 500,000 500,000 Annual Cashflow Totals 500,000 - 500,000 - - -

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unfunded Need 500,000 500,000 Funding Source Totals 500,000 - 500,000 - - -

290 MISCELLANEOUS CITY PROJECTS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Overview This project will provide for construction of over 61,000 linear feet of new pipeline and the associated pump stations for the distribution of recycled water.

Table 4-8 Miscellaneous City Projects With No Funding Source Miscellaneous Unfunded Project Costs 5-Yr TOTAL FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 FY 2019-20 Recycled Water Distribution System 30,000,000 - - 5,000,000 12,500,000 12,500,000 Miscellaneous Projects Unfunded Total 30,000,000 - - 5,000,000 12,500,000 12,500,000

Project Justification One of the City’s goals is to become more sustainable and to proactively plan for climate change. The Recycled Water Distribution System will help meet these goals by reducing the amount of potable water from SFPUC and provide a source of recycled water in collaboration with the construction of the facilities at the Waste Water Treatment Plant. This project will include developing an outreach campaign to encourage private properties to connect their landscaping and cooling towers to the recycled water supply lines.

291 MISCELLANEOUS CITY PROJECTS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Name: Recycled Water Distribution System Project No.: TBD Purpose: To construct a recycled water distribution system to reach the City of San Mateo identified high water users.

Objectives: • Construction of over 61,000 linear feet of new recycled water supply pipeline and the associated pump stations. • Coordination with CalWater to take over the distribution and billing of Recycled Water. • Develop an outreach campaign to encourage private properties on the new distribution lines to connect their landscaping and cooling towers to the recycled water supply lines. • Overall reduction in the potable water supplied by CalWater.

Business Priority: One of the City of San Mateo’s goals is to become more sustainable and proactively plan for Climate Change. One of the ways the City is meeting this goal is to plan for the reduction in potable water from the SFPUC. Constructing a recycled water distribution system in collaboration with the construction of the recycled water supply facilities at the Waste Water Treatment Plant will ensure that San Mateo residents will have water as potable water supplies decrease.

CIP Category: Projects that avoid future additional costs Boundary The Recycled Water Distribution Project is a sister project to the Recycled Water Supply Facilities Conditions: Project at the Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP). The supply will need to be in operation for the distribution system to be utilized. Due to the fact that the City of San Mateo cannot become a water purveyor, CalWater will play a pivotal role in distributing the water and perhaps even funding the construction of the distribution system. Public Works Engineering will play strong role in the construction of the distribution system as it will involve the design and construction of a new water line throughout the City of San Mateo. The City of San Mateo has received a grant from the State Water Board to develop a Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study, which is scheduled to be complete during FY2015/2016. Following the completion of the Plan, funding will need to be identified in order for the supply and distribution system to be constructed. Furthermore, the City of Foster City will be a major partner in the development of the Recycled Water Supply Facilities as they are partial owners in the WWTP.

Location: City-wide Project Manager: Kenneth Chin, Project Manager II Department: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division

292 MISCELLANEOUS CITY PROJECTS Capital Project Charters – 2015-2020 Projects With No Funding Source

Project Summary Prior Yrs Budget Expended & Encumbered Prior Yrs Budget Balance - Additional Capital Need 30,000,000 Total Project Need 30,000,000

Project Cost Cashflow 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Preliminary Engineering 5,000,000 5,000,000 Construction 25,000,000 12,500,000 12,500,000 Other - Annual Cashflow Totals 30,000,000 - - 5,000,000 12,500,000 12,500,000

Funding Sources / Capital Needs Assessment 5-Year Total 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Unidentified 30,000,000 5,000,000 12,500,000 12,500,000 Funding Source Totals 30,000,000 - - 5,000,000 12,500,000 12,500,000

293

294 Appendices

295

296

City Debt Limits & Obligations

The City is bound by a provision in state law limiting indebtedness for California cities to 15% of the assessed value of all real and personal property of the City. The City of San Mateo has been prudent in its use of debt to finance projects and major purchases. Prior to the issuance of any debt, the funding source for the debt service is identified and designated. The level of debt to which the City obligates itself is managed within available resources and represents a minimal cost to general taxpayers. By managing the repayment of new debt, current City operations are not affected.

The City of San Mateo recognizes the need for spending a prudent amount every year for ongoing capital replacement and rehabilitation needs. An ongoing capital improvement plan is vital to ensuring the future viability of services. To achieve this priority, the City funds its regular and ongoing capital needs primarily on a "pay‐as‐you‐go" basis. There are, however, special or extraordinary capital improvement projects in which it is appropriate to consider debt financing.

Credit Rating It is the City’s goal to maintain our AA+/Aa1 credit rating. The factors that contribute to our high rating include the City’s strong financial management, low debt levels, budgetary and fiscal controls, and accountability. To support this policy, the City will continue to maintain its position of full financial disclosure and proactive fiscal planning.

Debt Issuance Process It is appropriate to consider debt financing for capital improvements. The term of the debt issuance should not exceed the useful life expectancy of the asset acquired, constructed, or improved.

It is appropriate to consider debt financing under the following circumstances: • The project financing can be paid for directly by the users of the facility. • For enterprise funded projects, when a significant backlog of capital improvements cannot be addressed through the ongoing capital budget without having a significant impact on utility rates. • Funding for a large project (or grouping of similar projects) would have a significant negative impact on the availability of funding for other ongoing capital needs. • Capital leases may be considered for purchases of large pieces of equipment.

Legal Debt Limit Based upon the assessed valuation of $18.04 billion for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014, the City is limited to general obligation indebtedness of $2.7 billion. As of June 30, 2014, the amount of debt applicable to the debt limit is $26.1 million. The City has issued debt well below its legal debt limit.

297

Debt Obligations Summaries of City of San Mateo debt activity for FY 2014-15 are provided as follows.

Table 5-1 Outstanding Indebtedness of the City of San Mateo as of 6/30/2015 FY 2015-16 Principal Principal & Date of Date of Amount Outstanding at Interest Type of Debt Obligation Issue Maturity Interest Rates Issued June 30, 2015 Payments Lease Rev 2003 (Landfill/Parks) 10/30/2003 8/1/1934 4.1-5.0 7,900,000 6,320,000 492,480 Lease Rev 2007A (Police Station) 4/16/2007 8/1/1938 variable rate 17,400,000 16,155,000 285,000 Lease Rev 2007B (Golf) 10/25/2007 8/1/2029 3.7-4.38 9,125,000 7,465,000 671,741 Lease Rev 2011A (S. Bayfront Flood) 2/1/2011 8/1/2029 3.0-5.625 5,745,000 5,090,000 480,125 GO 2013 (Library) 3/1/2013 8/1/1932 2.5-4.0 27,295,000 25,210,000 2,040,575 Sewer Debt Obligations Sewer Rev 2011A 5/1/2011 8/1/1941 0.37-5.25 31,990,000 26,160,000 2,676,058 Sewer Rev Refunding 2014 7/3/2014 8/1/2044 3.0-5.0 32,255,000 32,255,000 1,344,365 SWRCB Loans (estimate) 4/4/2014 4/30/2045 1.9-2.1 31,300,000 4,000,000 - TOTALS: 163,010,000 $ 122,655,000 $ 7,990,344

General Governmental Debt

2003 San Mateo Joint Powers Financing Authority Lease Revenue Bonds (Landfill Closure Project) Series 2003 The Joint Powers Financing Authority issued $7,900,000 Revenue Bonds on October 30, 2003, to finance expenditures related to the final closures of a former landfill site and construction of park improvements thereon. The 2003 Bonds are limited obligations of the Authority payable solely from certain revenues of the Authority, consisting of Base Rental Payments pursuant to a Facility Lease and Installment Payments pursuant to an Installment Payment Contract between the Authority and the City. Pursuant to the Facility Lease, the City will lease the Facilities from the Authority. The City funds the lease payments to the Authority from garbage collection surcharge fees. Principal payments are payable annually on August 1 and interest payments semi-annually on February 1 and August 1.

2007 San Mateo Joint Powers Financing Authority Lease Revenue Bonds (Police Station Project), Series 2007A The Authority issued $17,400,000 Joint Powers Financing Authority Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2007A on April 16, 2007 to finance the expenditures related to the acquisition, construction and installation of the police station. The interest rate of the Lease Revenue Bonds is determined based on the weekly rate by the Remarketing Agency no greater than 12% per annum. The Lease Revenue Bonds are solely payable from revenues of the Authority, consisting of base rental payments pursuant to a facility lease and installment payments made by the City to the Authority. The City has elected to use the 2% transient occupancy tax revenue Measure C initiative, backed by a General Fund lease, to pay the annual principal and interest payments on the bonds.

2011 San Mateo Joint Powers Finance Authority Lease Revenue Bonds (South Bayfront Flood Control Project), Series 2011A On February 1, 2011 the Authority issued $5,745,000 Joint Powers Finance Authority Revenue Bonds (South Bayfront Flood Control Project), Series 2011A to finance certain levee and flood

298

control improvements. The Bonds are special obligations of the Authority and are solely payable from revenues consisting of Base Rental Payments to a Facility Lease and Installment Payments pursuant to an Installment Payment Contract made between the Authority and the City. The City funds the Installment Payments to the Authority from South Bayfront Assessment revenues that consist of all revenues received by the City from the levy and collection of the South Bayfront Benefit Assessments. Principal payments are payable annually on August 1 and interest payments are payable semi-annually on February 1 and August 1.

2013 General Obligation Refunding Bonds (Library Project), Series 2013 On March 1, 2013 the City issued $27,295,000 in General Obligation Refunding Bonds. The bond proceeds were used to refund the 2000 and 2004 General Obligation Bonds originally issue to finance construction of a new main library and improvements to the City’s branch libraries. The present value refunding savings attributable to the Refunding Bonds was $5.82 million, or 21.3% of the par amount of the refunding bonds issued. The City is obligated to levy ad valorem taxes upon all property subject to taxation of the City for the payment of interest and principal of the Bonds. Principal payments are payable annually on August 1 and interest payments semi-annually on February 1 and August 1.

Golf Course Enterprise Debt

2007 San Mateo Joint Powers Financing Authority Lease Revenue Bonds (Golf Course Project), Series 2007B The Authority issued $9,125,000 Joint Powers Financing Authority Revenue Bonds (Golf Course Project), Series 2007B on October 25, 2007 to refund the Joint Powers Authority Revenue Bonds, Series 1999 used to finance the reconstruction of the City’s public golf course and replacement of the clubhouse. The Bonds are special obligations of the Authority payable solely from the golf course facility lease revenue of the Authority funded by municipal Golf Enterprise Fund charges for services. Principal payments are payable annually on August 1 and interest payments are payable semi-annually on February 1 and August 1.

Utility Sewer Enterprise Debt

2011 Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 2011A The City issued $31,990,000 in Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 2011A on May 1, 2011 to refund the 1996 Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1996A and 1998 Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 1998A, both used to finance various improvements to the City’s municipal sewer enterprise, deposit funds into a reserve for the 2011 Sewer Revenue Bonds and the 2003 Sewer Revenue Bonds, and pay a portion of the costs of issuance of the 2011 Sewer Revenue Bonds. The Bonds are payable solely from net revenues received by the City from the operation of the municipal Sewer Enterprise and certain funds and accounts held under the Indenture. Principal payments are payable annually on August 1 and interest payments are payable semi-annually on February 1 and August 1.

2014 Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 2014A The City authorized $32,255,000 in Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 2014A on July 3, 2014 to refund the 2003 Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2003, both used to finance various improvements to the City’s municipal sewer enterprise, and finance an additional $18,000,000 to finance sewer improvements. The Bonds will be payable solely from net revenues received by the City from the operation of the municipal Sewer Enterprise and certain funds. Principal payments will be payable annually on August 1 and interest payments will be payable semi- annually on February 1 and August 1.

299

2014 State Water Control Board Revolving Loan Fund Loans (25th Avenue and South Trunk) On April 4, 2014 the City incurred two State Water Control board Revolving Fund Loans (SRF) authorized for up to $31,300,000 to finance various improvements to the City’s municipal sewer enterprise on 25th Avenue and the City’s South Trunk sewer collection system. The SRF obligations allow the City to draw down funds as needed to pay costs of improvements. The loans are payable solely from net revenues received by the City from the operation of the municipal Sewer Enterprise. Debt service of principal and interest with respect to each of the SRF obligations is payable annually, in equal installments, commencing one year after completion of the construction of the respective capital improvements. The amount payable annually for each loan will be based on the total respective amounts drawn down, accrued interest, and completion dates of the improvements financed. Payment in full on the SRF obligations must be made by April 30, 2045. The SRF obligations are fixed rate loans.

300

Index of Capital Projects

301 CITY OF SAN MATEO, CAPITAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT (2015-2020) INDEX OF CAPITAL PROJECTS

INDEX SORTED BY PROJECT TITLE

Project Title Project # Page No(s)

20th Ave/ECR SB Right Turn Lane 467005 31, 40, 42, 59, 61, 63, 69-70 20th Avenue/Alameda de las Pulgas Intersection TBD 37, 65, 240, 242 25th Ave at Delaware Str Bike Box & Green Bike Lane TBD 37, 65, 240, 243 25th Ave Utility Undergrounding 464402 40, 59, 61, 91-92 3rd Ave & Norfolk Street Intersection Improvement TBD 37, 65, 240, 244 3rd Ave & Parrott Street Intersection Improvement TBD 37, 65, 240, 245 41st/Pacific Pump Station – New Force Main (SST-13) 469985 58, 63, 101, 103 41st/Pacific Pump Station Upgrade (SST-17) 469986 58, 63, 101, 104 4th Ave and Humboldt Street Improvements TBD 37, 65, 240, 246 ADA Facility Improvements, City-wide TBD 38, 65, 263, 265 ADA Transition Plan TBD 37, 65, 240, 247 Alameda de las Pulgas Road Diet TBD 37, 65, 240, 248 Alley Improvements 468348 36, 66, 207, 208 Art in Public Places 310330 59, 60, 197-198 Bay Meadows Affordable Housing Site 310416 28, 58, 34, 39, 61, 175, 177 Bay Meadows Community Park (Construction) TBD 16, 17, 35, 37, 64, 65, 228-229 Bay Meadows Community Park (Master Plan) 610031 34, 42, 59, 61, 153-155 Bay to Transit Trail Feasibility Study TBD 37, 65, 240, 249 Bayfront Levee Improvement So of SM Creek 468301 31, 32, 59, 60, 95-96 Beresford Recreation Center Parking Lot Repair TBD 38, 65, 263, 266 Beresford Recreation Tennis Courts Re-surfacing TBD 38, 65, 263, 267 Bermuda Bridge Replacement 462246 32, 40, 58, 60-61, 83, 85 Building Access System Upgrade/Replacement 610041 65, 287-288 CDBG Community Facilities 310520 58, 60, 197, 199 CDBG Concrete Repairs 461212 58, 60, 167, 168 Central Garage Parking Deck Repair 461001-1002 146 Central Park (Construction) TBD 16, 17, 35, 37, 64, 65, 228, 230 Central Park (Master Plan/Playground) 610027-29123 33-34, 42, 59, 61, 153, 154, 156 Central Park Tennis Courts Resurfacing TBD 38, 65, 263, 268 CiRM System Implementation 212007 28, 12, 35, 39, 58, 61, 187-188 City Hall 20th Ave Metal Roof Replacement TBD 38, 65, 263, 269 City Hall Atrium and CDD Remodel 310118 181 City Hall Landscaping-Water Conservation 461111 12, 28, 34, 39, 58, 61, 179, 182 City Wide Lead Base Paint Abatement TBD 66, 215-216 City Wide Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation 469913 58, 63, 101, 105 Citywide - Park Field Renovations 610016 37, 65, 228, 231 Citywide - Park Pathway Rehabilitation 610033 34, 42, 59, 61, 153-154, 157 Citywide - Park Play Area Upgrades 610017 34, 42, 59, 61, 153-154, 158 Citywide - Park Play Area Upgrades (Future Needs) TBD 37, 65, 228, 232 Citywide - Park Restroom Door Locks 610024 34, 42, 59, 61, 153-154, 159 Citywide - Protective Shade Structures 610014 37, 65, 228, 233 Citywide - Special Facility Upgrades in Parks 610035 34, 42, 59, 61, 153-154, 160 Citywide - Water Conservation in Parks 610015 37, 65, 228, 234 Citywide Bicycle Parking 465162 169 Citywide Bike/Ped Path Improvements 465004 28, 39, 40, 58, 61, 167, 170 Citywide Bridge Maintenance 462004 32, 40, 58, 61, 83, 86 Citywide Pedestrian Scale Lighting TBD 16, 35, 37, 64-65, 240, 250 Citywide Sidewalk Repair Program 463231 28, 35, 39, 58, 61-62, 167, 171 Citywide Sign Inventory/Replacement 466607 31, 40, 59, 61, 69, 71 Citywide Storm Sewer Improvements 468004 36, 66, 219, 221 Citywide Street Lights 463004 59, 62, 91, 93 Citywide Street Lights (Future Needs) TBD 66, 215, 217 Citywide Street Reconstruction 467774 28, 31, 39, 48, 59, 61, 69, 72 Citywide Street Reconstruction (Future Needs) TBD 16, 36, 66, 207, 209 Citywide Street Rehabilitation 467004 28, 30-31, 39-40, 48, 59, 60-62, 69, 73

302 CITY OF SAN MATEO, CAPITAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT (2015-2020) INDEX OF CAPITAL PROJECTS

INDEX SORTED BY PROJECT TITLE

Project Title Project # Page No(s)

Citywide Traffic Calming 466600 31, 42, 59, 63, 69, 74 Citywide Traffic Signals 466004 31, 40, 59, 61, 69, 75 Citywide Tree Planting – Parks Division 610008 59, 63, 201 Citywide Tree Trimming 610053 197, 200 Closed Circuit TV Sewer Inspection 469925 58, 62, 101, 106 Collection System SCADA 469916 58, 62, 101, 107 Columbia/Crystal Springs Storm Drain 468007 36, 66, 219, 222 Contracts Management System TBD 65, 287, 289 Corporate Yard Facility, New 461002 38, 65, 263-264, 270 Corporate Yard-Fleet Shop Improvements TBD 38, 65, 263-264, 271 Corridor Transp Mgmt Assoc (TMA) 461109 31, 59, 63, 69, 76 Dale Ave Existing Force Main & Pump Station Rehab 469942 30, 58, 60, 62-63, 101, 109 Dale Ave NEW Wet Weather Force Main & Pump Station 469968 58, 60, 62, 101, 108 Dale Avenue Relief (LPS-4) 469950 58, 62, 101, 110 De Anza Boulevard/92 Ramp 467006 31, 59, 61, 69, 77 Delaware Mainline Sewer Rehabilitation 469987 58, 62, 101, 111 Delaware Str at Pacific Blvd Bicycle Left-Turn Pocket TBD 37, 65, 240, 251 Development Review Software 310211 189 Digester Gas to Compressed Natural Gas 469967 58, 60, 62, 100, 123 Disinfection: Immed Proj: Hypochlorite Day /Bisulfite Tank 469974 58, 60, 62, 100, 124 Document Management System TBD 65, 287, 290 Downtown Parking Improvements 461001-1001 33, 59, 62, 145 Downtown Sidewalk Repair Program 465160 37, 65, 240, 252 Downtown Signal Controller Upgrades 465163 172 Downtown Transportation Management Association 461110 31, 59, 60, 69, 78 El Camino @ Hwy 92 Interchange Improvement 462225 14, 32, 42, 54, 58, 60-61, 63, 83, 87 El Camino Real Garage Stairwell Replacement 461001-1003 147 El Cerrito Trunk Relief-Construction Phase 469957 112 El Cerrito Trunk SS Relief (SNT 1&4) 469934 113 Electrical: Immediate Projects (WWTP) 469979 58, 60, 62, 100, 125 Elevator Refurbishment-Central and El Camino Garages 461001-1004 148 Energy Efficient Lighting Conversion TBD 37, 65, 228, 235 Fiesta Meadows Park Parking Lots Renovation TBD 38, 65, 263, 272 Fire Station 25 Bathroom Replacement TBD 38, 65, 263, 273 Fire Station 27 Bathroom Replacement TBD 38, 65, 263, 274 Fire Station 27 Earthquake Evaluation TBD 38, 65, 263, 275 Fire Station 27 Earthquake Upgrades TBD 38, 65, 263, 276 Golf Course-Replace Irrigation Pump Station 618280 33-34, 59, 61, 154, 161 Golf Course-Re-sodding Fairways 618279 33-34, 59, 61, 154, 161 Golf Course-Well Drilling 618278 33-34, 59, 61, 154, 161 Gravity Thickener 1 & 2 (WWTP) 469975 58, 60, 62-63, 100, 126 Highway 92 Crossing Study TBD 37, 65, 240, 253 Hillsdale / US 101 Bridge Overcrossing 465157 37, 65, 240, 254 Hillsdale Station Relocation Plan 462204 14, 32, 54, 58, 61-62, 83, 88 Inflow/Infiltrattion Reduction Study 469989 58, 62, 101, 116 J. Hart Clinton Drive Median Re-Landscaping TBD 38, 65, 263, 277 Japanese Garden Fencing Renovation TBD 38, 65, 263, 278 Kingridge Sewer Rehabilitation & Mitigation 469922 114 Laurelwood/Sugarloaf Open Space 610012 17, 37, 65, 153, 228, 236 Laurelwood/Sugarloaf Park Path Project TBD 17, 37, 65, 153, 240, 255 LED Lighting at Parking Facilities 461001-1005 149 LED Retrofit & High Voltage Conversion 463005 94 Los Prados No. 1 Pump Station Upgrades 469988 58, 62-63, 101, 115 Los Prados Park Building Refurbishment TBD 38, 65, 263, 279 Los Prados Park Parking Lots Renovation TBD 38, 65, 263, 280

303 CITY OF SAN MATEO, CAPITAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT (2015-2020) INDEX OF CAPITAL PROJECTS

INDEX SORTED BY PROJECT TITLE

Project Title Project # Page No(s)

Los Prados Park Tennis/Basketball Courts Re-surfacing TBD 38, 65, 263, 281 Minor Home Repair 310521 58, 60, 175, 178 New Administration Building - Corp Yard/WWTP 461005 58, 60, 62, 100, 127 New Bldg Component Replacement (Additional Needs) TBD 38, 65, 263-264, 282 New Building Component Replacement (Status Quo) 469030 28, 34, 39, 58, 61, 179, 184 New Downtown Parking Garage 461007 14, 33, 59, 62, 145, 150 New Flow Equalization Storage Project (WWTP) 469965 30, 50, 56, 58, 60, 62-63, 100, 128 Norfolk Str Road Diet TBD 37, 65, 240, 256 North B Improvement Project 465147 37, 65, 240, 257 North Bayfront Levee Improvements Project 468305 17, 36, 66, 219, 223 On-Site Stormwater Improvements Project 469959 58, 60, 63, 100, 129 Park Citywide Plygnd Eqp Replace/PW 462897 28, 34, 39, 59, 61, 154, 164, Park Pathways Upgrades TBD 38, 65, 263, 283 Park Site Amenities 610030 34, 42, 59, 61, 154, 165, Park Site Amenities (Future Needs) TBD 37, 65, 228, 237 Parks and Recreation Business Software 610872 12, 28, 35, 39, 58, 61, 187, 191 Parkside Acquatic Docks Renovation TBD 38, 65, 263, 284 Parkside Aquatics Interior Restrooms Refurbishment TBD 38, 65, 263, 285 PCI-DSS Credit Card Processing Infrastructure 461004-xxxx 192 Pedestrian Master Plan (North Central Ped Improv) 465150 37, 65, 240, 258 Pedestrian Master Plan Intersection Improvement TBD 37, 65, 240, 259 Police HVAC Modifications 461006 185 Poplar Ave & Coyote Point Pump Stations Rehab 468201 17, 36, 66, 219, 224 Poplar Ave/Amphlett Blvd Improvements 466602 31, 40, 59, 61, 69, 79 Primary Clarifier #4 Rehabilitation 469982 130 Program Management – Clean Water Program 469981 30, 50, 56, 58, 60, 62, 100, 131 Public Educ Govt CATV Access (PEG) 210001 202 Public Facility & Site Improvements 461004 186 Public Works Document Imaging 461102 40, 58, 61, 187, 193 Rail-Corridor Grade Separation 462202 13-14, 28, 32, 42, 52, 54, 58, 60-61, 63, 83, 89 Recycled Water Distribution System TBD 64, 65, 291, 292 Root Foaming 469933 58, 62, 101, 117 Ryder Park Levee Repair 468006 12, 28, 31-32, 39, 59, 61, 95, 97 Safe Routes to School Program 465164 173 San Mateo Commuter Shuttle 460930 58, 61-62, 197, 203 San Mateo Drive Sustainable Streets 467007 31, 40, 42, 59, 61, 63, 69, 80 Sanitary Sewer I / I Reduction 467833 58, 62, 101, 118 Saratoga Drive Corridor Improvement Study TBD 36, 66, 207, 210 SEC System - SCs 1-4&RAS Pump Valve 469973 58, 60, 62-63, 100, 132 Secondary Treatment Capacity Project 469958 13, 30, 50, 56, 58, 60, 62-63, 100, 133 Security Cameras Installation-Downtown Parking 461001-1007 151 Sewer Pump Station Improvements 469450 30, 58, 62, 101, 119 Shoreview Parking Lot and Pathways Replacement TBD 38, 65, 263, 286 Short-Term Motor-Control-Cabinet 469962 58, 60, 62, 100, 134 Signal System Capital Recovery 465533 81 Solids Building Immed Proj - Centrifuge Hoist (WWTP) 469978 58, 60-62, 100, 136 Solids Building Immed Projs – Boiler Replace (WWTP) 469976 58, 60-62, 100, 135 South Delaware/Bay Meadows Parallel (SST-3) 469972 58, 62, 101, 120 South Trunk System Upgrade 469911 13, 30, 56, 58, 62-63, 101, 121 Sports Fields Conversion Synthetic Turf 610023 33-34, 42, 59, 61, 153-154, 166 Storm System Dredging 468005 36, 66, 219, 226 Stress Test WWTP Master Plan Environmental Document 469938 58, 60-62, 100, 137 Sustainable Streets Plan 465158 37, 65, 240, 260 Tank Drain Pump Replacement 469963 58, 60, 62, 100, 138 Technology Projects (Master Plan) 212007 194

304 CITY OF SAN MATEO, CAPITAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT (2015-2020) INDEX OF CAPITAL PROJECTS

INDEX SORTED BY PROJECT TITLE

Project Title Project # Page No(s)

Traffic Controllers Cabinets 465631 36, 66, 207, 211 Traffic Improvements – El Camino Real/Barneson Ave TBD 36, 66, 207, 212 Traffic Model Update 466601 31, 42, 59, 63, 69, 82 Traffic Signal Improvements TBD 36, 66, 207, 213 Wayfinding Signage Program TBD 37, 65, 240, 261 Wheelchair Ramp Installation in Downtown TBD 37, 65, 240, 262 WWTP Aeration Blower Replacement 469990 58, 60, 62-63, 100, 139 WWTP Annual Major Components 469949 58, 60, 100, 140 WWTP Hopper, Cake Pump and Building Enclosure 469939 58, 60-61, 63, 100, 141 WWTP New Headworks & Primary Clarifiers Replacement 469984 13, 30, 50, 56, 58, 60-63, 100, 142 WWTP Recycled Water Supply Facilities 469983 143 WWTP SCADA & Plant Control System (PCS) 469948 58, 60, 62, 100, 144

305 CITY OF SAN MATEO, CAPITAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT (2015-2020) INDEX OF CAPITAL PROJECTS

INDEX SORTED BY PROJECT NUMBER

Project Title Project # Page No(s)

Public Educ Govt CATV Access (PEG) 210001 202 CiRM System Implementation 212007 28, 12, 35, 39, 58, 61, 187-188 Technology Projects (Master Plan) 212007 194 City Hall Atrium and CDD Remodel 310118 181 Development Review Software 310211 189 Art in Public Places 310330 59, 60, 197-198 Bay Meadows Affordable Housing Site 310416 28, 58, 34, 39, 61, 175, 177 CDBG Community Facilities 310520 58, 60, 197, 199 Minor Home Repair 310521 58, 60, 175, 178 San Mateo Commuter Shuttle 460930 58, 61-62, 197, 203 Corporate Yard Facility, New 461002 38, 65, 263-264, 270 Public Facility & Site Improvements 461004 186 New Administration Building - Corp Yard/WWTP 461005 58, 60, 62, 100, 127 Police HVAC Modifications 461006 185 New Downtown Parking Garage 461007 14, 33, 59, 62, 145, 150 Public Works Document Imaging 461102 40, 58, 61, 187, 193 Corridor Transp Mgmt Assoc (TMA) 461109 31, 59, 63, 69, 76 Downtown Transportation Management Association 461110 31, 59, 60, 69, 78 City Hall Landscaping-Water Conservation 461111 12, 28, 34, 39, 58, 61, 179, 182 CDBG Concrete Repairs 461212 58, 60, 167, 168 Citywide Bridge Maintenance 462004 32, 40, 58, 61, 83, 86 Rail-Corridor Grade Separation 462202 13-14, 28, 32, 42, 52, 54, 58, 60-61, 63, 83, 89 Hillsdale Station Relocation Plan 462204 14, 32, 54, 58, 61-62, 83, 88 El Camino @ Hwy 92 Interchange Improvement 462225 14, 32, 42, 54, 58, 60-61, 63, 83, 87 Bermuda Bridge Replacement 462246 32, 40, 58, 60-61, 83, 85 Park Citywide Plygnd Eqp Replace/PW 462897 28, 34, 39, 59, 61, 154, 164, Citywide Street Lights 463004 59, 62, 91, 93 LED Retrofit & High Voltage Conversion 463005 94 Citywide Sidewalk Repair Program 463231 28, 35, 39, 58, 61-62, 167, 171 25th Ave Utility Undergrounding 464402 40, 59, 61, 91-92 Citywide Bike/Ped Path Improvements 465004 28, 39, 40, 58, 61, 167, 170 North B Improvement Project 465147 37, 65, 240, 257 Pedestrian Master Plan (North Central Ped Improv) 465150 37, 65, 240, 258 Hillsdale / US 101 Bridge Overcrossing 465157 37, 65, 240, 254 Sustainable Streets Plan 465158 37, 65, 240, 260 Downtown Sidewalk Repair Program 465160 37, 65, 240, 252 Citywide Bicycle Parking 465162 169 Downtown Signal Controller Upgrades 465163 172 Safe Routes to School Program 465164 173 Signal System Capital Recovery 465533 81 Traffic Controllers Cabinets 465631 36, 66, 207, 211 Citywide Traffic Signals 466004 31, 40, 59, 61, 69, 75 Citywide Traffic Calming 466600 31, 42, 59, 63, 69, 74 Traffic Model Update 466601 31, 42, 59, 63, 69, 82 Poplar Ave/Amphlett Blvd Improvements 466602 31, 40, 59, 61, 69, 79 Citywide Sign Inventory/Replacement 466607 31, 40, 59, 61, 69, 71 Citywide Street Rehabilitation 467004 28, 30-31, 39-40, 48, 59, 60-62, 69, 73 20th Ave/ECR SB Right Turn Lane 467005 31, 40, 42, 59, 61, 63, 69-70 De Anza Boulevard/92 Ramp 467006 31, 59, 61, 69, 77 San Mateo Drive Sustainable Streets 467007 31, 40, 42, 59, 61, 63, 69, 80 Citywide Street Reconstruction 467774 28, 31, 39, 48, 59, 61, 69, 72 Sanitary Sewer I / I Reduction 467833 58, 62, 101, 118

306 CITY OF SAN MATEO, CAPITAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT (2015-2020) INDEX OF CAPITAL PROJECTS

INDEX SORTED BY PROJECT NUMBER

Project Title Project # Page No(s)

Citywide Storm Sewer Improvements 468004 36, 66, 219, 221 Storm System Dredging 468005 36, 66, 219, 226 Ryder Park Levee Repair 468006 12, 28, 31-32, 39, 59, 61, 95, 97 Columbia/Crystal Springs Storm Drain 468007 36, 66, 219, 222 Poplar Ave & Coyote Point Pump Stations Rehab 468201 17, 36, 66, 219, 224 Bayfront Levee Improvement So of SM Creek 468301 31, 32, 59, 60, 95-96 North Bayfront Levee Improvements Project 468305 17, 36, 66, 219, 223 Alley Improvements 468348 36, 66, 207, 208 New Building Component Replacement (Status Quo) 469030 28, 34, 39, 58, 61, 179, 184 Sewer Pump Station Improvements 469450 30, 58, 62, 101, 119 South Trunk System Upgrade 469911 13, 30, 56, 58, 62-63, 101, 121 City Wide Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation 469913 58, 63, 101, 105 Collection System SCADA 469916 58, 62, 101, 107 Kingridge Sewer Rehabilitation & Mitigation 469922 114 Closed Circuit TV Sewer Inspection 469925 58, 62, 101, 106 Root Foaming 469933 58, 62, 101, 117 El Cerrito Trunk SS Relief (SNT 1&4) 469934 113 Stress Test WWTP Master Plan Environmental Document 469938 58, 60-62, 100, 137 WWTP Hopper, Cake Pump and Building Enclosure 469939 58, 60-61, 63, 100, 141 Dale Ave Existing Force Main & Pump Station Rehab 469942 30, 58, 60, 62-63, 101, 109 WWTP SCADA & Plant Control System (PCS) 469948 58, 60, 62, 100, 144 WWTP Annual Major Components 469949 58, 60, 100, 140 Dale Avenue Relief (LPS-4) 469950 58, 62, 101, 110 El Cerrito Trunk Relief-Construction Phase 469957 112 Secondary Treatment Capacity Project 469958 13, 30, 50, 56, 58, 60, 62-63, 100, 133 On-Site Stormwater Improvements Project 469959 58, 60, 63, 100, 129 Short-Term Motor-Control-Cabinet 469962 58, 60, 62, 100, 134 Tank Drain Pump Replacement 469963 58, 60, 62, 100, 138 New Flow Equalization Storage Project (WWTP) 469965 30, 50, 56, 58, 60, 62-63, 100, 128 Digester Gas to Compressed Natural Gas 469967 58, 60, 62, 100, 123 Dale Ave NEW Wet Weather Force Main & Pump Station 469968 58, 60, 62, 101, 108 South Delaware/Bay Meadows Parallel (SST-3) 469972 58, 62, 101, 120 SEC System - SCs 1-4&RAS Pump Valve 469973 58, 60, 62-63, 100, 132 Disinfection: Immed Proj: Hypochlorite Day /Bisulfite Tank 469974 58, 60, 62, 100, 124 Gravity Thickener 1 & 2 (WWTP) 469975 58, 60, 62-63, 100, 126 Solids Building Immed Projs – Boiler Replace (WWTP) 469976 58, 60-62, 100, 135 Solids Building Immed Proj - Centrifuge Hoist (WWTP) 469978 58, 60-62, 100, 136 Electrical: Immediate Projects (WWTP) 469979 58, 60, 62, 100, 125 Program Management – Clean Water Program 469981 30, 50, 56, 58, 60, 62, 100, 131 Primary Clarifier #4 Rehabilitation 469982 130 WWTP Recycled Water Supply Facilities 469983 143 WWTP New Headworks & Primary Clarifiers Replacement 469984 13, 30, 50, 56, 58, 60-63, 100, 142 41st/Pacific Pump Station – New Force Main (SST-13) 469985 58, 63, 101, 103 41st/Pacific Pump Station Upgrade (SST-17) 469986 58, 63, 101, 104 Delaware Mainline Sewer Rehabilitation 469987 58, 62, 101, 111 Los Prados No. 1 Pump Station Upgrades 469988 58, 62-63, 101, 115 Inflow/Infiltrattion Reduction Study 469989 58, 62, 101, 116 WWTP Aeration Blower Replacement 469990 58, 60, 62-63, 100, 139 Citywide Tree Planting – Parks Division 610008 59, 63, 201 Laurelwood/Sugarloaf Open Space 610012 17, 37, 65, 153, 228, 236 Citywide - Protective Shade Structures 610014 37, 65, 228, 233 Citywide - Water Conservation in Parks 610015 37, 65, 228, 234

307 CITY OF SAN MATEO, CAPITAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT (2015-2020) INDEX OF CAPITAL PROJECTS

INDEX SORTED BY PROJECT NUMBER

Project Title Project # Page No(s)

Citywide - Park Field Renovations 610016 37, 65, 228, 231 Citywide - Park Play Area Upgrades 610017 34, 42, 59, 61, 153-154, 158 Sports Fields Conversion Synthetic Turf 610023 33-34, 42, 59, 61, 153-154, 166 Citywide - Park Restroom Door Locks 610024 34, 42, 59, 61, 153-154, 159 Park Site Amenities 610030 34, 42, 59, 61, 154, 165, Bay Meadows Community Park (Master Plan) 610031 34, 42, 59, 61, 153-155 Citywide - Park Pathway Rehabilitation 610033 34, 42, 59, 61, 153-154, 157 Citywide - Special Facility Upgrades in Parks 610035 34, 42, 59, 61, 153-154, 160 Building Access System Upgrade/Replacement 610041 65, 287-288 Citywide Tree Trimming 610053 197, 200 Parks and Recreation Business Software 610872 12, 28, 35, 39, 58, 61, 187, 191 Golf Course-Well Drilling 618278 33-34, 59, 61, 154, 161 Golf Course-Re-sodding Fairways 618279 33-34, 59, 61, 154, 161 Golf Course-Replace Irrigation Pump Station 618280 33-34, 59, 61, 154, 161 Downtown Parking Improvements 461001-1001 33, 59, 62, 145 Central Garage Parking Deck Repair 461001-1002 146 El Camino Real Garage Stairwell Replacement 461001-1003 147 Elevator Refurbishment-Central and El Camino Garages 461001-1004 148 LED Lighting at Parking Facilities 461001-1005 149 Security Cameras Installation-Downtown Parking 461001-1007 151 PCI-DSS Credit Card Processing Infrastructure 461004-xxxx 192 Central Park (Master Plan/Playground) 610027-29123 33-34, 42, 59, 61, 153, 154, 156 20th Avenue/Alameda de las Pulgas Intersection TBD 37, 65, 240, 242 25th Ave at Delaware Str Bike Box & Green Bike Lane TBD 37, 65, 240, 243 3rd Ave & Norfolk Street Intersection Improvement TBD 37, 65, 240, 244 3rd Ave & Parrott Street Intersection Improvement TBD 37, 65, 240, 245 4th Ave and Humboldt Street Improvements TBD 37, 65, 240, 246 ADA Facility Improvements, City-wide TBD 38, 65, 263, 265 ADA Transition Plan TBD 37, 65, 240, 247 Alameda de las Pulgas Road Diet TBD 37, 65, 240, 248 Bay Meadows Community Park (Construction) TBD 16, 17, 35, 37, 64, 65, 228-229 Bay to Transit Trail Feasibility Study TBD 37, 65, 240, 249 Beresford Recreation Center Parking Lot Repair TBD 38, 65, 263, 266 Beresford Recreation Tennis Courts Re-surfacing TBD 38, 65, 263, 267 Central Park (Construction) TBD 16, 17, 35, 37, 64, 65, 228, 230 Central Park Tennis Courts Resurfacing TBD 38, 65, 263, 268 City Hall 20th Ave Metal Roof Replacement TBD 38, 65, 263, 269 City Wide Lead Base Paint Abatement TBD 66, 215-216 Citywide - Park Play Area Upgrades (Future Needs) TBD 37, 65, 228, 232 Citywide Pedestrian Scale Lighting TBD 16, 35, 37, 64-65, 240, 250 Citywide Street Lights (Future Needs) TBD 66, 215, 217 Citywide Street Reconstruction (Future Needs) TBD 16, 36, 66, 207, 209 Contracts Management System TBD 65, 287, 289 Corporate Yard-Fleet Shop Improvements TBD 38, 65, 263-264, 271 Delaware Str at Pacific Blvd Bicycle Left-Turn Pocket TBD 37, 65, 240, 251 Document Management System TBD 65, 287, 290 Energy Efficient Lighting Conversion TBD 37, 65, 228, 235 Fiesta Meadows Park Parking Lots Renovation TBD 38, 65, 263, 272 Fire Station 25 Bathroom Replacement TBD 38, 65, 263, 273 Fire Station 27 Bathroom Replacement TBD 38, 65, 263, 274 Fire Station 27 Earthquake Evaluation TBD 38, 65, 263, 275 Fire Station 27 Earthquake Upgrades TBD 38, 65, 263, 276

308 CITY OF SAN MATEO, CAPITAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT (2015-2020) INDEX OF CAPITAL PROJECTS

INDEX SORTED BY PROJECT NUMBER

Project Title Project # Page No(s)

Highway 92 Crossing Study TBD 37, 65, 240, 253 J. Hart Clinton Drive Median Re-Landscaping TBD 38, 65, 263, 277 Japanese Garden Fencing Renovation TBD 38, 65, 263, 278 Laurelwood/Sugarloaf Park Path Project TBD 17, 37, 65, 153, 240, 255 Los Prados Park Building Refurbishment TBD 38, 65, 263, 279 Los Prados Park Parking Lots Renovation TBD 38, 65, 263, 280 Los Prados Park Tennis/Basketball Courts Re-surfacing TBD 38, 65, 263, 281 New Bldg Component Replacement (Additional Needs) TBD 38, 65, 263-264, 282 Norfolk Str Road Diet TBD 37, 65, 240, 256 Park Pathways Upgrades TBD 38, 65, 263, 283 Park Site Amenities (Future Needs) TBD 37, 65, 228, 237 Parkside Acquatic Docks Renovation TBD 38, 65, 263, 284 Parkside Aquatics Interior Restrooms Refurbishment TBD 38, 65, 263, 285 Pedestrian Master Plan Intersection Improvement TBD 37, 65, 240, 259 Recycled Water Distribution System TBD 64, 65, 291, 292 Saratoga Drive Corridor Improvement Study TBD 36, 66, 207, 210 Shoreview Parking Lot and Pathways Replacement TBD 38, 65, 263, 286 Traffic Improvements – El Camino Real/Barneson Ave TBD 36, 66, 207, 212 Traffic Signal Improvements TBD 36, 66, 207, 213 Wayfinding Signage Program TBD 37, 65, 240, 261 Wheelchair Ramp Installation in Downtown TBD 37, 65, 240, 262

309

310