The 12Th Solanaceae Conference

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The 12Th Solanaceae Conference SOL2015 would like to thank our sponsors: The 12th Solanaceae Conference The 12th Solanaceae Conference 1 The 12th Solanaceae Conference 2 CONTENTS Scientific Committee, Conference Chairs and Speakers ..................................... 4 Map of the Conference Site ............................................................................... 5 Social Events ..................................................................................................... 6 Program at a Glance .......................................................................................... 9 Scientific Program ............................................................................................. 10 Abstract (Monday, October 26th) Keynote lecture (KL‐1) ...................................................................................... 23 Session I – Plant Growth & Development ........................................................ 24 Session II – Biodiversity .................................................................................... 27 Session III – Molecular Breeding ...................................................................... 30 Session IV – Bioinformatics and SGN Workshop .............................................. 32 Abstract (Tuesday, October 27th) Keynote lecture (KL‐2) ...................................................................................... 34 Session V – Flower, Fruit and Tuber Biology .................................................... 35 Abstract (Wednesday, October 28th) Keynote lecture (KL‐3) ...................................................................................... 40 Session VI – Metabolism and Quality ............................................................... 41 Session VII – Systems Biology and Modelling ................................................... 43 Parallel sessions: Tomato ...................................................................................................... 47 Potato ........................................................................................................ 52 Coffee ........................................................................................................ 57 Pepper/Eggplant ........................................................................................ 61 Specialized Metabolism ............................................................................. 65 Photosynthesis and Fruit Quality .............................................................. 70 Tobacco...................................................................................................... 73 Abstract (Tursday, October 29th) Keynote lecture (KL‐4) ...................................................................................... 76 Session VIII – New Tools for Gene Discovery and Biotechnology .................... 77 Session IX – Biotic Stress I ................................................................................. 78 Session X – Biotic Stress II ................................................................................. 80 Session XI – Abiotic Stress ................................................................................ 83 Poster Abstracts ................................................................................................ 87 Participant index ............................................................................................... 147 The 12th Solanaceae Conference 3 Scientific Committee Dr Christophe ROTHAN (INRA Fruit Biology and Pathology, France) Dr Mathilde CAUSSE (INRA Genetics and Improvement of Fruit and Vegetable, France) Pr Mondher BOUZAYEN (INRA/INP ENSA Toulouse, France) Conference Chairs and Speakers (alphabetic order): Pr Asaph AHARONI (Weizmann Institute of Science, Israël) Pr Tohru ARIIZUMI (Tsukuba University, Japan) Dr Christian BACHEM (Wageningen University, Netherlands) Dr Yuling BAI (Wageningen University, Netherlands) Pr Mondher BOUZAYEN (INRA/INP ENSA Toulouse, France) Dr Glenn BRYAN (The James Hutton Institute, Dundee, UK) Dr Christian CHEVALIER (INRA Fruit Biology and Pathology, France) Pr Doil CHOI (Seoul National University, Korea) Dr Sophie COLOMBIÉ (INRA Fruit Biology and Pathology, France) Dr Dominique CROUZILLAT (Nestle R) Dr Alexandre DE KOCHKO (IRD Montpellier, France) Pr Jim GIOVANNONI (Boyce Thompson Institute, Cornell, USA) Pr Antonio GRANELL (IBMCP‐CSIC Valencia, Spain) Dr Jeremy HARBINSON (Wageningen University, Netherlands) Dr Nikolai IVANOV (Philip Morris International, Switzerland) Dr René KLEIN LANKHORST (Wageningen University, Netherlands) Pr Robert LAST (Michigan State University, USA) Pr Avi LEVY (Weizmann Institute of Science, Israël) Pr Chuanyou LI (Chinese Academy of Sciences, China) Pr Zachary LIPPMAN (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory – CSH, USA) Pr Lukas MUELLER (Boyce Thompson Institute, Cornell, USA) Dr Zoran NIKOLOSKI (Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Golm, Germany) Dr Ilan PARAN (Agricultural Research Organization, Israël) Dr Francisco PEREZ‐ALFOCEA (CEBAS‐CSIC Murcia, Spain) Pr Jocelyn ROSE (Cornell University, USA) Dr Thomas STÄDLER (Swiss Federal institute of Technology –ETH, Switzerland) Pr Miltos TSIANTIS (Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Köln, Germany) The 12th Solanaceae Conference 4 MAP OF THE CONFERENCE SITE 1, avenue du Dr A. Schweitzer 33402 Talence First floor Ground floor The 12th Solanaceae Conference 5 EXCURSION IN SAINT‐EMILION Tue, Oct 27th 14:00‐18:00 Excursion in Saint Emilion the medieval town of Saint Emilion, in the heart of the Bordeaux wine world Only for people with the logo on their badge. A ticket will be given if you choose to do the St Emilion visit and this ticket must be given to the guide on the bus. The place of departure will be near the building of the ENSEIRB, streetside, at avenue du Docteur Schweitzer. The 12th Solanaceae Conference 6 GALA DINNER Wed, Oct 28th 20:00 The Gala dinner will be organized in one of the most prestigious place of Bordeaux, the Palais de la Bourse, located in the heart of the city by the river, benefiting from an ideal situation, easily reachable with all types of transports. The Palais de la Bourse is surrounded by historical buildings, which reflect the cultural heritage of the city. Pictures Credits : Palais de la Bourse. Address : 19 Place de la Bourse, Bordeaux The 12th Solanaceae Conference 7 The 12th Solanaceae Conference 8 PROGRAM AT A GLANCE Sun, Oct 25 Mon, Oct 26 Tue, Oct 27 Wed, Oct 28 Thu, Oct 29 08:00 Registration 08:45‐ Opening Welcome 09:00 08:45‐ Keynote lecture 08:45‐ Keynote lecture 08:45‐ Keynote lecture 09:00‐ Keynote lecture 09:30 J. Giovannoni 09:30 Z. Nikoloski 09:30 A. Levy 09:45 M. Tsiantis VIII‐New tools for I‐Plant Growth & V‐Flower, Fruit & 09:45‐ 09:30‐ 09:30‐ VI‐Metabolism and Quality 09:30‐ gene discovery & Dev. Tuber Biology 10:15 10:00 10:45 A. Aharoni 10:30 biotechnology Z. Lippman C. Chevalier A. Granell Coffee Break Coffee Break & Poster session Coffee Break & Poster session Coffee Break & Poster session 10:45‐ I‐Plant Growth & 10:30‐ V‐Flower, Fruit & 11:15‐ VII‐Systems Biology and Modelling 11:00‐ IX‐Biotic stress I 12:00 Dev. 12:00 Tuber Biology 12:45 J. Rose 12:00 C. Li Lunch Lunch and Poster session Lunch & Poster session Lunch PARALLEL SESSIONS(*) SESSIONS X and XI Amphi 14:00‐ II‐Biodiversity 0 F G H A B Amphi 0 F 15:45 T. Städler 14:15‐ TO PO CO PE SM PSQ X‐Biotic XI‐Abiotic 14:00‐ stress II stress 14:00‐ Excursion in Saint 15:45 I I I I I 15:30 Y. Bai F. Perez‐ Regis‐ 18:00 Emilion Alfocea 16:00‐ tration Coffee Break Coffee Break Closing of SOL2015 Welcome 20:00 15:30 and presentation of reception 16:15‐ III‐ Molecular Breeding 16:15‐ TO PO CO PE SM TB SOL2016 17:30 G. Bryan 17:30 II II II II II IV‐Bioinformatics & 17:30‐ SGN Workshop 18:45 L. Mueller 18:30‐ Poster session & 20:00 Gala Dinner 20:30 wine tasting (*)PARALLEL SESSIONS : TO: Tomato (M. Bouzayen/T. Ariizumi) PO: Potato (C. Bachem) CO: coffee (A. de Kochko / D. Crouzillat) PE: Pepper/Eggplant (I. Paran/ D. Choi) SM: Specialized Metabolism (R. Last) PSQ: Photosynthesis and Fruit Quality (J. Harbinson) TB: Tobacco (N. Ivanov) The 12th Solanaceae Conference 9 SCIENTIFIC PROGRAM Monday, October 26th 08:45-09:00 Opening Welcome Miltos Tsiantis - Keynote lecture 09:00-09:45 KL-1 Towards understanding development and diversity of leaf shape Session I : PLANT GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT Chair : Zachary Lippman (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSH), US) Bettina Hause 09:45-10:00 Stamen development in tomato – jasmonates control ethylene action in anther dehiscence OC-1 and pollen release 10:00-10:15 Niels A. Müller The circadian clock of cultivated tomato has been slowed down during domestication OC-2 10:15-10:45 Coffee Break Michael Nicolas 10:45-11h00 How to make it branched: a recently evolved alternative splice site in BRANCHED1a OC-3 controls plant architecture in potato 11:00-11:15 Klaus Theres Boundaries shape tomato shoot architecture and initiate new meristems OC-4 11:15-11h30 Kieron Edwards A time to flower: Insights into the photoperiodic regulation of flowering in Tobacco OC-5 11:30-12:00 Zachary Lippman - Invited lecture Returning to domestication to revitalize crop improvement: engineering the florigen system SP-1 12:00-14:00 Lunch Session II : BIODIVERSITY Chair : Thomas Staedler (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Switzerland) 14:00-14:30 Thomas Staedler - Invited lecture Using molecular diversity in wild tomatoes for inferences on evolution and speciation SP-2 14:30-14:45 Jose
Recommended publications
  • Genome Skimming for Phylogenomics
    Genome skimming for phylogenomics Steven Andrew Dodsworth School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK. Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy November 2015 1 Statement of originality I, Steven Andrew Dodsworth, confirm that the research included within this thesis is my own work or that where it has been carried out in collaboration with, or supported by others, that this is duly acknowledged and my contribution indicated. Previously published material is also acknowledged and a full list of publications is given in the Appendix. Details of collaboration and publications are given at the start of each chapter, as appropriate. I attest that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge break any UK law, infringe any third party’s copyright or other Intellectual Property Right, or contain any confidential material. I accept that the College has the right to use plagiarism detection software to check the electronic version of the thesis. I confirm that this thesis has not been previously submitted for the award of a degree by this or any other university. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author. Signature: Date: 16th November 2015 2 Frontispiece: Nicotiana burbidgeae Symon at Dalhousie Springs, South Australia. 2014. Photo: S. Dodsworth. 3 Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to thank my PhD supervisors, Professor Andrew Leitch and Professor Mark Chase.
    [Show full text]
  • PRODUCTO 1: BASE DE CONOCIMIENTO SOBRE BIODIVERSIDAD EN EL TERRITORIO URBANO RURAL DE LA LOCALIDAD DE SUBA Marzo De 2008
    CONV ENIO INTERADMINISTRATIVO 04-06/2006 S EC RETA RIA DIST RITAL DE AM BI ENT E (S DA) – I NSTITUT O DE INVESTIGACIÓN DE RECURSOS BIOLÓGICOS ALEXANDER VON HUMBOLDT (IAvH) CONSTRUCCIÓN COLECTIVA DE LA BIODIVERSIDAD URBANO RURAL EN EL TERRITORIO DE LA LOCALIDAD DE SUBA INFORME FINAL Marzo de 2008 INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN RECURSOS BIOLÓGICOS ALEXANDER VON HUMBOLDT (IAv H) SECRETARIA DIS TRITAL DEL AMBIENTE ALCALDÍA LOCAL DE SUBA FONDO DE DESARROLLO LOCAL UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL ABIERTA Y A DISTANCIA – UNAD I NTE RV E N TO R BOGOTÁ D.C. MARZO DE 2008 CONVENIO 04-06 DAMA (06 -706 IAv H) CONSTRUCCIÓN COLECTIVA DE LA BIODIVERSIDAD URBANO-RURAL DEL TERRITORIO DE LA LOCALIDAD DE SUBA CONV ENIO INTERADMINISTRATIVO 04-06/2006 S EC RETA RIA DIST RITAL DE AM BI ENT E (S DA) – I NSTITUT O DE INVESTIGACION DE RECURSOS BIOLOGICOS ALEXANDER VON HUMBOLDT (IAvH) CONSTRUCCIÓN COLECTIVA DE LA BIODIVERSIDAD URBANO RURAL EN EL TERRITORIO DE LA LOCALIDAD DE SUBA PRODUCTO 1: BASE DE CONOCIMIENTO SOBRE BIODIVERSIDAD EN EL TERRITORIO URBANO RURAL DE LA LOCALIDAD DE SUBA Marzo de 2008 INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACION EN RECURSOS BIOLÓGICOS ALEX ANDER VON HUMBOLDT ( IAvH) Coordinador : J AVIER OTERO GARCIA Autores: Diana Patricia Ramírez Aguilera Febe Lucia Ruíz Olga Lucia Trespalacios Javier Otero Garcia SECRETARIA DISTRITAL DE AMBIENTE CONTROL Y VIGILANCIA UEL – SDA REINALDO CONTRERAS – ALFONSO SANCHÉZ FONDO DE DESARROLLO LOCAL – ALCALDIA LOCAL DE SUBA OFICINA DE PLANEACIÓN – EDGAR MATALLANA INTERVENTOR UNIV ERSIDAD NACIONAL ABIERTA Y A DISTANCIA (UNAD) PATRICIA ILLERA
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Pepino (Solanum Muricatum Aiton)
    International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology (IJEAB) Vol-1, Issue-2, July -Aug- 2016] ISSN: 2456-1878 An introduction to Pepino ( Solanum muricatum Aiton): Review S. K. Mahato, S. Gurung, S. Chakravarty, B. Chhetri, T. Khawas Regional Research Station (Hill Zone), Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Kalimpong, Darjeeling, West Bengal, India Abstract — During the past few decades there has been America, Morocco, Spain, Israel and the highlands of renewed interest in pepino cultivation both in the Andean Kenya, as the pepino is considered a crop with potential for region and in several other countries, as the pepino is diversification of horticultural production (Munoz et al, considered a crop with potential for diversification of 2014). In the United States the fruit is known to have been horticultural production. grown in San Diego before 1889 and in Santa Barbara by It a species of evergreen shrub and vegetative propagated 1897 but now a days, several hundred hectares of the fruit by stem cuttings and esteemed for its edible fruit. Fruits are are grown on a small scale in Hawaii and California. The juicy, scented, mild sweet and colour may be white, cream, plant is grown primarily in Chile, New yellow, maroon, or purplish, sometimes with purple stripes Zealand and Western Australia. In Chile, more than 400 at maturity, whilst the shape may be spherical, conical, hectares are planted in the Longotoma Valley with an heart-shaped or horn-shaped. Apart from its attractive increasing proportion of the harvest being exported. morphological features, the pepino fruit has been attributed Recently, the pepino has been common in markets antioxidant, antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory and in Colombia, Ecuador, Bolivia, Peru and Chile and grown antitumoral activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Phenolic Profile and Biological Activities of the Pepino (Solanum Muricatum) Fruit and Its Wild Relative S. Caripense
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Phenolic Profile and Biological Activities of the Pepino (Solanum muricatum) Fruit and Its Wild Relative S. caripense Francisco J. Herraiz 1,†, Débora Villaño 2,†, Mariola Plazas 1, Santiago Vilanova 1, Federico Ferreres 2, Jaime Prohens 1,* and Diego A. Moreno 2 1 Instituto de Conservación y Mejora de la Agrodiversidad Valenciana, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera 14, 46022 Valencia, Spain; [email protected] (F.J.H.); [email protected] (M.P.); [email protected] (S.V.) 2 Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura–Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Food Science and Technology Department, Research Group on Quality, Safety and Bioactivity of Plant Foods. Campus Universitario de Espinardo–25, Espinardo, 30100 Murcia, Spain; [email protected] (D.V.); [email protected] (F.F.); [email protected] (D.A.M.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-96-387-9424; Fax: +34-96-387-9422 † These authors contributed equally to this work. Academic Editor: Antonio Segura-Carretero Received: 9 February 2016; Accepted: 10 March 2016; Published: 16 March 2016 Abstract: The pepino (Solanum muricatum) is an edible and juicy fruit native to the Andean region which is becoming increasingly important. However, little information is available on its phenolic composition and bioactive properties. Four pepino varieties (37-A, El Camino, Puzol, and Valencia) and one accession (E-7) of its close wild relative S. caripense were characterized by HPLC-DAD-MSn/ESI. Twenty-four hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives were detected (5 to 16 compounds per variety or accession), with differences of more than two-fold for their total content among the materials studied.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Ohlsondissertation.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in Genetics GENETIC CHARACTERIZATION AND MAPPING OF LATE BLIGHT RESISTANCE GENES IN THE WILD TOMATO ACCESSIONS PI 163245 AND PI 224710 A Dissertation in Genetics by Erik William Ohlson © 2015 Erik William Ohlson Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2015 ii The dissertation of Erik William Ohlson was reviewed and approved* by the following: Majid R. Foolad Professor of Plant Genetics Dissertation Advisor David R. Huff Professor of Turfgrass Breeding and Genetics Chair of Committee Surinder Chopra Professor of Maize Genetics Beth K. Gugino Associate Professor of Vegetable Pathology Timothy W. McNellis Associate Professor of Plant Pathology Yinong Yang Associate Professor of Plant Pathology Robert F. Paulson Professor of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences Chair of the Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in Genetics *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. iii ABSTRACT Late blight (LB), caused by the oomycete Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary is one of the most destructive diseases of tomato and potato worldwide. Development of fungicide resistant and more aggressive P. infestans clonal lineages has emphasized the importance of discovering and incorporating new genetic resistance in tomato cultivars. Although the cultivated tomato, Solanum lycopersicum L., contains limited genetic diversity, several related wild species of tomato are suitable for identification of new desirable traits. Previously, 67 S. pimpinellifolium accessions were screened for LB resistance in field, greenhouse and detached leaflet trials and 12 accessions with strong resistance to LB were identified. In this dissertation, two resistant accessions, PI 163245 and PI 224710, were selected for further genetic characterization.
    [Show full text]
  • Germination Season and Watering Regime, but Not Seed Morph, Affect Life History Traits in a Cold Desert Diaspore-Heteromorphic Annual Juan J
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Biology Faculty Publications Biology 7-11-2014 Germination Season and Watering Regime, But Not Seed Morph, Affect Life History Traits in a Cold Desert Diaspore-Heteromorphic Annual Juan J. Lu Xinjiang Agricultural University, China Dun Y. Tan Xinjiang Agricultural University, China Jerry M. Baskin University of Kentucky, [email protected] Carol C. Baskin University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits oy u. Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/biology_facpub Part of the Biology Commons, and the Plant Sciences Commons Repository Citation Lu, Juan J.; Tan, Dun Y.; Baskin, Jerry M.; and Baskin, Carol C., "Germination Season and Watering Regime, But Not Seed Morph, Affect Life History Traits in a Cold Desert Diaspore-Heteromorphic Annual" (2014). Biology Faculty Publications. 50. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/biology_facpub/50 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biology at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Germination Season and Watering Regime, But Not Seed Morph, Affect Life History Traits in a Cold Desert Diaspore-Heteromorphic Annual Notes/Citation Information Published in PLOS One, v. 9, issue 7, e102018. © 2014 Lu et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Tomato Genetics Cooperative
    Report of the Tomato Genetics Cooperative Volume 57 September 2007 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK Report of the Tomato Genetics Cooperative Number 57- September 2007 University of Florida Gulf Coast Research and Education Center 14625 CR 672 Wimauma, FL 33598 USA Foreword The Tomato Genetics Cooperative, initiated in 1951, is a group of researchers who share and interest in tomato genetics, and who have organized informally for the purpose of exchanging information, germplasm, and genetic stocks. The Report of the Tomato Genetics Cooperative is published annually and contains reports of work in progress by members, announcements and updates on linkage maps and materials available. The research reports include work on diverse topics such as new traits or mutants isolated, new cultivars or germplasm developed, interspecific transfer of traits, studies of gene function or control or tissue culture. Relevant work on the Solanaceous species is encouraged as well. Paid memberships currently stand at approximately 121 from 21 countries. Requests for membership (per year) US$20 to addresses in the US and US$25 if shipped to addresses outside of the United States should be sent to Dr. J.W. Scott, [email protected]. Please send only checks or money orders. Make checks payable to the University of Florida. We are sorry but we are NOT able to accept cash or credit cards. Cover. Design by Christine Cooley and Jay Scott. Depicted are “Tomatoes of the Round Table” as opposed to “Knights of the Round Table”. This year we celebrate the 50th Anniversary of the Tomato Breeders Roundtable (TBRT). See this year’s feature article for information on the history of the Tomato Breeders Roundtable.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity As a Resource: Plant Use and Land Use Among the Shuar, Saraguros, and Mestizos in Tropical Rainforest Areas of Southern Ecuador
    Biodiversity as a resource: Plant use and land use among the Shuar, Saraguros, and Mestizos in tropical rainforest areas of southern Ecuador Die Biodiversität als Ressource: Pflanzennutzung und Landnutzung der Shuar, Saraguros und Mestizos in tropischen Regenwaldgebieten Südecuadors Der Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades Dr. rer. nat. vorgelegt von Andrés Gerique Zipfel aus Valencia Als Dissertation genehmigt von der Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 9.12.2010 Vorsitzender der Promotionskommission: Prof. Dr. Rainer Fink Erstberichterstatterin: Prof. Dr. Perdita Pohle Zweitberichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Willibald Haffner To my father “He who seeks finds” (Matthew 7:8) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Firstly, I wish to express my gratitude to my supervisor, Prof. Dr. Perdita Pohle, for her trust and support. Without her guidance this study would not have been possible. I am especially indebted to Prof. Dr. Willibald Haffner as well, who recently passed away. His scientific knowledge and enthusiasm set a great example for me. I gratefully acknowledge Prof. Dr. Beck (Universität Bayreuth) and Prof. Dr. Knoke (Technische Universität München), and my colleagues and friends of the Institute of Geography (Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg) for sharing invaluable comments and motivation. Furthermore, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to those experts who unselfishly shared their knowledge with me, in particular to Dr. David Neill and Dr. Rainer Bussmann (Missouri Botanical Garden), Dr. Roman Krettek (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Mykologie), Dr. Jonathan Armbruster, (Auburn University, Alabama), Dr. Nathan K. Lujan (Texas A&M University), Dr. Jean Guffroy (Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Orleans), Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • KEY to FRUIT TYPES 1A. Fruit Derived from Several Ovaries of One Or More Flowers 2A. Fruit Arising from the Several Ovaries of A
    KEY to FRUIT TYPES 1a. Fruit derived from several ovaries of one or more flowers 2a. Fruit arising from the several ovaries of as many flowers (examples: pineapple, mulberry) MULTIPLE FRUIT 2b. Fruit arising from the coalescence of several ripened ovaries of one flower (example: raspberry, blackberry) AGGREGATE FRUIT 1b. Fruit derived from a single ovary (simple or compound) 3a. Fruit fleshy or juicy when ripe 4a. Ovary wall of fruit (or pericarp) entirely or in part fleshy 5a. Fruit indehiscent 6a. Ovary wall entirely fleshy (examples: tomato, cranberry, grape, currant, banana, melon [pepo], and citrus fruit [hesperidium]) BERRY 6b. Ovary wall of three distinct layers, the inner one bony (endocarp), the middle fleshy (mesocarp), and the outer "skin- like" (exocarp) (examples: peach, plum, cherry) DRUPE 5b. Fruit dehiscent 7a. Fruit derived from one carpel FOLLICLE 7b. Fruit derived from a compound gynoecium CAPSULE 4b. Ovary wall (e.g., the outer layer of an apple 'core') of fruit papery, surrounded by a fleshy material that represents the coalescent parts of the stamens, petals, sepals, and (some believe) receptacle (examples: apple, pear, quince) POME 3b. Fruit typically dry and usually hardened when ripe 8a. Fruit indehiscent (does not open or dehisce when mature), generally with one seed 9a. Ovary wall of varying thickness, usually not bony 10a. Fruit not winged (examples: buttercup, 'seeds' of strawberry, sunflower family, sedges, grasses [ovary wall adherent to and surrounding seed, may be called caryopsis or grain]) ACHENE 10b. Fruit winged (examples: elm, tulip tree) SAMARA 9b. Ovary wall hardened and bony 11a. Fruit usually > 5mm long (examples: oak, chestnut, hazelnut) NUT 11b.
    [Show full text]
  • Solanum Section Lycopersicon: Solanaceae)
    Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2016, 117, 96–105. With 4 figures. Using genomic repeats for phylogenomics: a case study in wild tomatoes (Solanum section Lycopersicon: Solanaceae) 1,2 2,3 € 4 5 STEVEN DODSWORTH *, MARK W. CHASE , TIINA SARKINEN , SANDRA KNAPP and ANDREW R. LEITCH1 1School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK 2Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3DS, UK 3School of Plant Biology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia 4Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh, 20A Inverleith Row, Edinburgh, EH3 5LR, UK 5Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK Received 17 February 2015; revised 7 May 2015; accepted for publication 21 May 2015 High-throughput sequencing data have transformed molecular phylogenetics and a plethora of phylogenomic approaches are now readily available. Shotgun sequencing at low genome coverage is a common approach for isolating high-copy DNA, such as the plastid or mitochondrial genomes, and ribosomal DNA. These sequence data, however, are also rich in repetitive elements that are often discarded. Such data include a variety of repeats present throughout the nuclear genome in high copy number. It has recently been shown that the abundance of repetitive elements has phylogenetic signal and can be used as a continuous character to infer tree topologies. In the present study, we evaluate repetitive DNA data in tomatoes (Solanum section Lycopersicon)to explore how they perform at the inter- and intraspecific levels, utilizing the available data from the 100 Tomato Genome Sequencing Consortium.
    [Show full text]
  • The De Novo Reference Genome and Transcriptome Assemblies of the Wild Tomato Species Solanum
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/612085; this version posted April 26, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 The de novo reference genome and transcriptome assemblies of the wild tomato species Solanum 2 chilense 3 4 Remco Stam1,2*§, Tetyana Nosenko3,4§, Anja C. Hörger5, Wolfgang Stephan6, Michael Seidel3, José M.M. 5 Kuhn7, Georg Haberer3#, Aurelien Tellier2# 6 7 1 Phytopathology, Technical University Munich, Germany 8 2 Population Genetics, Technical University Munich, Germany 9 3 Plant Genome and Systems Biology, Helmholtz Center of Munich, Germany 10 4 Environmental Simulations, Helmholtz Center of Munich, Germany 11 5 Department of Biosciences, University of Salzburg, Austria 12 6 Evolutionary Biology, LMU Munich and Natural History Museum Berlin, Germany 13 7 Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Albert-Ludwig University of Freiburg, Germany 14 15 *corresponding author: [email protected] 16 § contributed equally 17 # contributed equally 18 19 Keywords: 20 Genome sequence assembly, Transcriptome, Evolutionary Genomics, Tomato, NLR genes 1 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/612085; this version posted April 26, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 21 ABSTRACT 22 Background 23 Wild tomato species, like Solanum chilense, are important germplasm resources for enhanced biotic and 24 abiotic stress resistance in tomato breeding.
    [Show full text]
  • KEY to FRUIT TYPES 1A. Fruit Derived from Several Ovaries of One Or More Flowers 2A. Fruit Arising from the Several Ovaries of A
    KEY to FRUIT TYPES 1a. Fruit derived from several ovaries of one or more flowers 2a. Fruit arising from the several ovaries of as many flowers (examples: pineapple, mulberry) MULTIPLE FRUIT 2b. Fruit arising from the coalescence of several ripened ovaries of one flower (example: raspberry, blackberry) AGGREGATE FRUIT 1b. Fruit derived from a single ovary (simple or compound) 3a. Fruit fleshy or juicy when ripe 4a. Ovary wall of fruit (or pericarp) entirely or in part fleshy 5a. Fruit indehiscent 6a. Ovary wall entirely fleshy (examples: tomato, cranberry, grape, currant, banana, melon [pepo], and citrus fruit [hesperidium]) BERRY 6b. Ovary wall of three distinct layers, the inner one bony (endocarp), the middle fleshy (mesocarp), and the outer "skin- like" (exocarp) (examples: peach, plum, cherry) DRUPE 5b. Fruit dehiscent 7a. Fruit derived from one carpel FOLLICLE 7b. Fruit derived from a compound gynoecium CAPSULE 4b. Ovary wall (e.g., the outer layer of an apple 'core') of fruit papery, surrounded by a fleshy material that represents the coalescent parts of the stamens, petals, sepals, and (some believe) receptacle (examples: apple, pear, quince) POME 3b. Fruit typically dry and usually hardened when ripe 8a. Fruit indehiscent (does not open or dehisce when mature), generally with one seed 9a. Ovary wall of varying thickness, usually not bony 10a. Fruit not winged (examples: buttercup, 'seeds' of strawberry, sunflower family, sedges, grasses [ovary wall adherent to and surrounding seed, may be called caryopsis or grain]) ACHENE 10b. Fruit winged (examples: elm, tulip tree) SAMARA 9b. Ovary wall hardened and bony 11a. Fruit usually > 5mm long (examples: oak, chestnut, hazelnut) NUT 11b.
    [Show full text]