ANTH 489 Romans, Arabs and Vikings

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ANTH 489 Romans, Arabs and Vikings ANTH 489 Romans, Arabs and Vikings. Seafaring in the Mediterranean during the Early Christian Era. Class 8: Liburnians: Warships from the 1st to the 5th Century AD. Roman Imperial sources mention a ship type in the 1st century BC, the liburnian, probably light and fast, without an outrigger. The term first appeared around the 5th century BC.In the Late Roman/Early Byzantine period (4th century AD) liburnian became a synonym of warship. Nobody really knows what liburnians looked like, and written sources do not give many clues. It seems that liburnians were small, with a maximum of two rowers in a room, but the sources don‟t not say whether each rower had an oar to himself. It seems that they had really sharp bows, designed for speed. In the late 1st century BC, at the Battle of Actium (31 BC), Octavian used some kind of these small, pirate vessels, possibly developed in the Illyrian coast, by a tribe of pirates. The Battle of Actium was fought between the forces of Octavian (63 BC – AD 14) and Mark Anthony (83 BC – 30 BC) and Cleopatra (69 BC – 30 BC) on September 2nd 31 BC. Actium was the last big naval battle of the Roman period. After that the Mediterranean became a Roman lake, the Mare Nostrum, where piracy was almost completely eliminated. Although surveys have been conducted on the area in the 1990s, no remains of this battle have been found. Nobody really knows what Octavian or Marc Anthony‟s ships looked like. Octavian, later Caesar Augustus, built Nicopolis (“city of victory”) to commemorate his victory over Mark Antony at the battle of Actium on September 2, 31 B.C. Nicopolis became the capital of Epirus in northwestern Greece. At Nicopolis, Octavian built a monument commemorating his victory and included spaces for the rams of his adversary ships. We don‟t know exactly what warships looked like in late antiquity, nor do we know what they looked like until the 11th AD. Triremes, the typical war ships since the Greeks, 600 years before, evolved in time and are thought to have grown considerably before being replaced by the liburnians. Marc Anthony‟s ships were large and are referred to as triremes, „fours,‟ „fives,‟ „sixes,‟ „sevens‟ and even larger vessels. Fives, sixes, sevens, eights, etc. refer to the number of rows of oars per side (half room). Some scholars believe that „fives‟ had one row with one oarsman per oar, and two with two oarsmen per oar; sixes two rowers per oar, sevens 3 + 2 + 2, etc. Representations of early warships from the Illyrian coast may yield clues to the reconstruction of this vessel type. These representations frequently show rams, and double-ended hulls. During the Empire Rome subdued most pirates and gained control of large portions of the Mediterranean. There were many pirates, especially in Illyria, where they used small craft named Liburni and an effective warfare tactic for the period: hit and run. General Sextus Pompey (67-35 BC) , naval commander in the 1st century BC, led an effective campaign against piracy in the second half of the century. Around this time, liburnians seem to become and increasingly important part of the Roman fleets. What do we know about the vessels of the Illyricum? There is a 5th century BC image of an engagement at sea on a bronze vessel. The ship represented ahs only one line of oars and no outrigger. In the 2nd century BC some coins show the same type of small ship, with only one line of oars and no outrigger. Instead, the oars rest on the gunwale or pass through oar ports, like in the 5th century image. Some coins represent vessels with sterns similar to the bows, a feature that may not be just a stylistic modification to better fit the coin surface. Some sources mention liburnians as ships capable to reverse movement and even ram with both the bow and the stern. Because a small number of Roman reliefs show rowers rowing forward, some scholars hypothesized that liburnians could move in both directions. Stern rams are not described in ancient sources, although some texts seem to suggest their existence. Representations of Illyrian ships sometimes show almost straight sterns, sometimes with a small protuberance abaft the post. They were adopted by the Roman navy and seem to have made ideal patrol boats. Stationed in provincial rivers, they became an increasingly larger portion of the Roman army/navy. Another characteristic that makes liburnians different from the previous fighting galleys if the absence of a fighting deck above rower‟s compartments. In the iconography the rower‟s upper bodies remain visible. Sometimes rowers can be seen from the waist up. Bow castles seem to be another characteristic of the liburnians. In conclusion: In the 4th and 5th centuries liburnians seem to have been: 1. Lightly built; 2. With one or two levels of rowers; 3. A sharp bow; 4. Forecastles; 5. Upper rowers with their heads above the railing; 6. A fighting platform in the middle. .
Recommended publications
  • The First Illyrian War: a Study in Roman Imperialism
    The First Illyrian War: A Study in Roman Imperialism Catherine A. McPherson Department of History and Classical Studies McGill University, Montreal February, 2012 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts ©Catherine A. McPherson, 2012. Table of Contents Abstract ……………………………………………….……………............2 Abrégé……………………………………...………….……………………3 Acknowledgements………………………………….……………………...4 Introduction…………………………………………………………………5 Chapter One Sources and Approaches………………………………….………………...9 Chapter Two Illyria and the Illyrians ……………………………………………………25 Chapter Three North-Western Greece in the Later Third Century………………………..41 Chapter Four Rome and the Outbreak of War…………………………………..……….51 Chapter Five The Conclusion of the First Illyrian War……………….…………………77 Conclusion …………………………………………………...…….……102 Bibliography……………………………………………………………..104 2 Abstract This paper presents a detailed case study in early Roman imperialism in the Greek East: the First Illyrian War (229/8 B.C.), Rome’s first military engagement across the Adriatic. It places Roman decision-making and action within its proper context by emphasizing the role that Greek polities and Illyrian tribes played in both the outbreak and conclusion of the war. It argues that the primary motivation behind the Roman decision to declare war against the Ardiaei in 229 was to secure the very profitable trade routes linking Brundisium to the eastern shore of the Adriatic. It was in fact the failure of the major Greek powers to limit Ardiaean piracy that led directly to Roman intervention. In the earliest phase of trans-Adriatic engagement Rome was essentially uninterested in expansion or establishing a formal hegemony in the Greek East and maintained only very loose ties to the polities of the eastern Adriatic coast.
    [Show full text]
  • The Late Republic in 5 Timelines (Teacher Guide and Notes)
    1 180 BC: lex Villia Annalis – a law regulating the minimum ages at which a individual could how political office at each stage of the cursus honorum (career path). This was a step to regularising a political career and enforcing limits. 146 BC: The fall of Carthage in North Africa and Corinth in Greece effectively brought an end to Rome’s large overseas campaigns for control of the Mediterranean. This is the point that the historian Sallust sees as the beginning of the decline of the Republic, as Rome had no rivals to compete with and so turn inwards, corrupted by greed. 139 BC: lex Gabinia tabelleria– the first of several laws introduced by tribunes to ensure secret ballots for for voting within the assembliess (this one applied to elections of magistrates). 133 BC – the tribunate of Tiberius Gracchus, who along with his younger brother, is seen as either a social reformer or a demagogue. He introduced an agrarian land that aimed to distribute Roman public land to the poorer elements within Roman society (although this act quite likely increased tensions between the Italian allies and Rome, because it was land on which the Italians lived that was be redistributed). He was killed in 132 BC by a band of senators led by the pontifex maximus (chief priest), because they saw have as a political threat, who was allegedly aiming at kingship. 2 123-121 BC – the younger brother of Tiberius Gracchus, Gaius Gracchus was tribune in 123 and 122 BC, passing a number of laws, which apparent to have aimed to address a number of socio-economic issues and inequalities.
    [Show full text]
  • A PRELIMINARY GEOCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION of RELIEF CERAMICS from the NADIN NECROPOLIS a Thesis Presented to the Faculty Of
    A PRELIMINARY GEOCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF RELIEF CERAMICS FROM THE NADIN NECROPOLIS A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Elizabeth Gaj Proctor August 2019 © 2019 Elizabeth Gaj Proctor ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT This paper analyzes a collection of Hellenistic mold-made relief vessels discovered during the 2018 season of the Nadin-Gradina Archaeological Project through non-destructive portable x-ray fluorescence (pXRF). Archaeometric analysis allows for a reconsideration of previous conclusions about the origins of these vessels and possible trade connections at the site of Nadin. The goal of this study is to determine potential source groups for these vessels through their geochemical composition. While the suitability of pXRF as an analytical tool for archaeological ceramics has been debated, the qualitative design of this research project and the physical characteristics of these vessels allow pXRF to be utilized successfully. Statistical analysis of pXRF results indicate the presence of multiple source groups represented in the samples. The attribution of most of these samples to a smaller number of potential source groups indicates a strong connection between the residents of Nadin and at least two production centers. This thesis is intended to suggest preliminary conclusions about potential sources and suggest areas of further study to better understand the trade connections that brought these vessels to Nadin and the role of Nadin in the Ravni Kotari landscape. ii BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Elizabeth Gaj Proctor received her BA from the University of Maine in 2017, majoring in Anthropology and minoring in Art History and Medieval and Renaissance Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Silk Road in World History
    The Silk Road in World History The New Oxford World History The Silk Road in World History Xinru Liu 1 2010 3 Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offi ces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright © 2010 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Liu, Xinru. The Silk Road in world history / Xinru Liu. p. cm. ISBN 978-0-19-516174-8; ISBN 978-0-19-533810-2 (pbk.) 1. Silk Road—History. 2. Silk Road—Civilization. 3. Eurasia—Commerce—History. 4. Trade routes—Eurasia—History. 5. Cultural relations. I. Title. DS33.1.L58 2010 950.1—dc22 2009051139 1 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper Frontispiece: In the golden days of the Silk Road, members of the elite in China were buried with ceramic camels for carrying goods across the desert, hoping to enjoy luxuries from afar even in the other world.
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION Prodigies Were a Standard Feature of Roman
    INTRODUCTION Apud Actium descendenti in aciem asellus cum asinario occurrit: homini Eutychus, bestiae Nicon erat nomen; utrisque simulacrum aeneum victor posuit in templo, in quod castrorum suorum locum vertit. At Actium as he was going down to begin the battle, he met an ass with his driver, the man having the name Eutychos [Lucky] and the beast that of Nikon [Victor]; and aft er the victory he set up bronze images of the two in the sacred enclosure into which he converted the site of his camp (Suet. Aug. 96.2).1 Prodigies were a standard feature of Roman historiography and the triumviral period was no exception. Th e setting of this story is the hill of Michalitsi just before the battle of Actium on 2nd September 31 BC, north of the future Nicopolis, where the statue of the donkey and the driver was erected on Octavian’s Victory Monument (Plut. Ant. 65.3). Together with rams from captured enemy ships the statue showed that Octavian was helped by the gods in his victory at Actium.2 Th e luck might refer to Apollo, who also had a statue on the monument, as he was the god that helped Octavian to victory. Octavian clearly thought it was important to spread the story of divine intervention at Actium. Th e legend of Actium was born. Historical analysis and the ideology of the regime of Octavian/ Augustus, not narrative, is the subject of this book. A re-evaluation of Augustus’ rise to power in 43–27 BC, fi rst as triumvir, and then as sole ruler, will be central to the analysis, focusing particularly on the part played by ideological claims.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean Culture
    ANTONIJE SHKOKLJEV SLAVE NIKOLOVSKI - KATIN PREHISTORY CENTRAL BALKANS CRADLE OF AEGEAN CULTURE Prehistory - Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean culture By Antonije Shkokljev Slave Nikolovski – Katin Translated from Macedonian to English and edited By Risto Stefov Prehistory - Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean culture Published by: Risto Stefov Publications [email protected] Toronto, Canada All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without written consent from the author, except for the inclusion of brief and documented quotations in a review. Copyright 2013 by Antonije Shkokljev, Slave Nikolovski – Katin & Risto Stefov e-book edition 2 Index Index........................................................................................................3 COMMON HISTORY AND FUTURE ..................................................5 I - GEOGRAPHICAL CONFIGURATION OF THE BALKANS.........8 II - ARCHAEOLOGICAL DISCOVERIES .........................................10 III - EPISTEMOLOGY OF THE PANNONIAN ONOMASTICS.......11 IV - DEVELOPMENT OF PALEOGRAPHY IN THE BALKANS....33 V – THRACE ........................................................................................37 VI – PREHISTORIC MACEDONIA....................................................41 VII - THESSALY - PREHISTORIC AEOLIA.....................................62 VIII – EPIRUS – PELASGIAN TESPROTIA......................................69
    [Show full text]
  • The City and the Coin in the Ancient and Early Medieval Worlds
    The City and the Coin in the Ancient and Early Medieval Worlds Edited by Fernando López Sánchez BAR International Series 2402 2012 Published by Archaeopress Publishers of British Archaeological Reports Gordon House 276 Banbury Road Oxford OX2 7ED England [email protected] www.archaeopress.com BAR S2402 The City and the Coin in the Ancient and Early Medieval Worlds © Archaeopress and the individual authors 2012 ISBN 978 1 4073 0997 2 Cover coin: RPC1 172, Obv: AVGVSTVS DIVI F, bare gead, r.; Rev: C LAETILIVS APALVS II V Q, diadem (with crescent and lotus above) enclosing REX PTOL. The Trustess of the British Museum. Printed in England by CMP (UK) Ltd All BAR titles are available from: Hadrian Books Ltd 122 Banbury Road Oxford OX2 7BP England www.hadrianbooks.co.uk The current BAR catalogue with details of all titles in print, prices and means of payment is available free from Hadrian Books or may be downloaded from www.archaeopress.com Actia Nicopolis. Coinage, currency and civic identity (27 BC-AD 268) Dario Calomino abstract Nicopolis of Epirus (north-western Greece), founded by Octavian to commemorate the Actium victory over Marc Antony and Cleopatra in 31 BC, was also known as “Actia Nicopolis”. Ancient authors’ reports suggest that the city profited from very special imperial benefits: a privileged administrative statute (as civitas libera and probably foederata), a pre-eminent political position in the Delphic Amphictiony and in the province (as capital of Epirus), a leading ethnic-cultural role in western Greece (being populated through interregional synoecism), a strong symbolic meaning for the Roman policy in Greece (as the only proper Greek foundation of Augustus).
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Notation: a Comparative History
    This page intentionally left blank Numerical Notation Th is book is a cross-cultural reference volume of all attested numerical notation systems (graphic, nonphonetic systems for representing numbers), encompassing more than 100 such systems used over the past 5,500 years. Using a typology that defi es progressive, unilinear evolutionary models of change, Stephen Chrisomalis identifi es fi ve basic types of numerical notation systems, using a cultural phylo- genetic framework to show relationships between systems and to create a general theory of change in numerical systems. Numerical notation systems are prima- rily representational systems, not computational technologies. Cognitive factors that help explain how numerical systems change relate to general principles, such as conciseness and avoidance of ambiguity, which also apply to writing systems. Th e transformation and replacement of numerical notation systems relate to spe- cifi c social, economic, and technological changes, such as the development of the printing press and the expansion of the global world-system. Stephen Chrisomalis is an assistant professor of anthropology at Wayne State Uni- versity in Detroit, Michigan. He completed his Ph.D. at McGill University in Montreal, Quebec, where he studied under the late Bruce Trigger. Chrisomalis’s work has appeared in journals including Antiquity, Cambridge Archaeological Jour- nal, and Cross-Cultural Research. He is the editor of the Stop: Toutes Directions project and the author of the academic weblog Glossographia. Numerical Notation A Comparative History Stephen Chrisomalis Wayne State University CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo, Delhi, Dubai, Tokyo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521878180 © Stephen Chrisomalis 2010 This publication is in copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Powerpoint%201-25 Compressed
    1/24/12 • Monarchy (tradionally, 753-509 BC): - 7 kings, starng with Romulus (but also a senate) - Last few Kings were Etruscan - Ends when Tarquin the Proud is kicked out - trad. date 509 BC for founding of the Republic • True? Specifics are legend, but, yes, there were kings. • Traces of Monarchy: – Regia (king’s house) – Rex Sacrorum (king of sacred rites) a priesthood in the Republic • Meanwhile in Greece: Homer & lyric poets like Sappho Early Republic (c. 509 to 264 BC) (res publica = commonwealth) - supreme power shared by annually elected officials - constant ext. struggle among small Italian city-states - constant internal class struggle over polical power - military and econ. decline aer end of monarchy • NB: kingdom and early Rep. not well known. Few historical sources & many legends, later distorons. • Roman literature only begins in 3rd cent. BC, • Meanwhile in Greece: Fih century = Athenian Golden Age, Classical period of democracy, Greek tragedy, & Athenian hegemony. 1 1/24/12 Middle Republic (c.264 – 133 BC) • huge growth, and creaon of “Roman Empire” as we know it. Rome mistress of Italy by 260s, and then dominates West. and East. Med. • establishes internal polical equilibrium between classes (but precarious) • Meanwhile in Greece: • Hellenisc Age- compeng dynases all over East, fighng over pieces of Alexander the Great’s conquests. Late Republic (c.133-31 BC) • Connued external expansion in all direcons • but paradoxically: internal chaos at Rome. Assassinaons, violence, polically sanconed murder, bribery, revolt, and civil
    [Show full text]
  • Illyrian Policy of Rome in the Late Republic and Early Principate
    ILLYRIAN POLICY OF ROME IN THE LATE REPUBLIC AND EARLY PRINCIPATE Danijel Dzino Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Classics University of Adelaide August 2005 II Table of Contents TITLE PAGE I TABLE OF CONTENTS II ABSTRACT V DECLARATION VI ACKNOWLEDGMENTS VII LIST OF FIGURES VIII LIST OF PLATES AND MAPS IX 1. Introduction, approaches, review of sources and secondary literature 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Rome and Illyricum (a short story) 2 1.3 Methodology 6 1.4.1 Illyrian policy of Rome in the context of world-system analysis: Policy as an interaction between systems 9 1.4.2 The Illyrian policy of Rome in the context of world-system analysis: Working hypothesis 11 1.5 The stages in the Roman Illyrian relationship (the development of a political/constitutional framework) 16 1.6 Themes and approaches: Illyricum in Roman historiography 18 1.7.1 Literature review: primary sources 21 1.7.2 Literature review: modern works 26 2. Illyricum in Roman foreign policy: historical outline, theoretical approaches and geography 2.1 Introduction 30 2.2 Roman foreign policy: Who made it, how and why was it made, and where did it stop 30 2.3 The instruments of Roman foreign policy 36 2.4 The place of Illyricum in the Mediterranean political landscape 39 2.5 The geography and ethnography of pre-Roman Illyricum 43 III 2.5.1 The Greeks and Celts in Illyricum 44 2.5.2 The Illyrian peoples 47 3. The Illyrian policy of Rome 167 – 60 BC: Illyricum - the realm of bifocality 3.1 Introduction 55 3.2 Prelude: the making of bifocality 56 3.3 The South and Central Adriatic 60 3.4 The North Adriatic 65 3.5 Republican policy in Illyricum before Caesar: the assessment 71 4.
    [Show full text]
  • An Adriatic Journey from Trieste to Dubrovnik: a Historic Introduction
    An Adriatic Journey from Trieste to Dubrovnik: A Historic Introduction The long, narrow Adriatic Sea has been both a bridge and a barrier between the Italian and Balkan peninsulas for millennia. Across its waters numerous civilizations and three great belief systems - Latin and Orthodox Christianity, and Islam - have both interacted and vied for supremacy. Our journey explores how the Adriatic was used as a trade corridor from the Mediterranean to Northern Europe and as a frontier between Europe and the Balkans. It begins in the seaport of Trieste in northeast Italy, and then traverses the stunning coast of the eastern Adriatic, through Croatia and Montenegro. Amidst the vibrant, cosmopolitan communities that inhabit this coastline today, you will encounter legacies of the many cultures—Illyrian, Greek, Roman, Venetian, Slav, Austro- Hungarian, Ottoman—that once traded and settled along these shores. Geography has shaped the history of the Adriatic. Much of its coastline is hemmed in by the high mountains of the Italian Apennine Range to the west and the Balkan Dinaric Alps to the east. Its east coast is also protected by a large number of picturesque coastal islands. Possession of its ports and islands has therefore determined much of its destiny as successive empires competed to control them and the lucrative trade routes that passed through them. Romans, Venetians and Habsburgs, for example, all prospered from controlling Trieste. Spectacularly located at the north-eastern end of the Adriatic Sea and close to the centre of Europe, Trieste provided merchants a port that allowed their goods to travel to the heart of Europe via the Alpine trade routes or to the Mediterranean via its sea trade routes.
    [Show full text]