(February 1, 2021)

What About Book of Mormon Names?

Are They “Quoted” From the Bible?

I have attempted to address personal names and place names in the Book of Mormon in each of my “Introduction” volumes as a type of Word Form. At times these names might be metaphoric, at times they might be metonymic, and at times they might symbolize covenants. But having said that, and for the sake of addressing the idea of “plagiarism” from the Bible, I will provide some perspective here.

In 1973, John A. Tvedtnes, MA, a graduate student in Semitic linguistics and archaeology at the time at Hebrew University, Jerusalem, presented a paper titled: “A Phonemic Analysis of Nephite and Jaredite Proper Names.” In this paper, Tvedtnes reported on his exploration of the phonemic roots of the names of persons and places found in the Book of Mormon. Because the paper is, in many parts, very technical in the field of Near Eastern linguistics, I have reprinted only some simplified explanatory excerpts along with the conclusion.

John Tvedtnes began by stating that in his previous studies, he had presented evidence to support the view that a partly Hebraic structure characterized the present English text of the Book of Mormon. From that basis, he writes:

It follows that, if the Prophet in his translation followed so closely the syntax of the indicated original Hebrew text, he would also have made an attempt to transliterate directly the proper names in Mormon’s record. That this was the case is evidenced by the testimony of David Whitmer and Emma Smith to the effect that whenever Joseph came to proper names he spelled them out for his scribe (Hugh Nibley, Lehi in the Desert, 1952, p. 32).

Tvedtnes continued by noting that while reviewing the research of a colleague, Robert F. Smith, he came to realize that there was a greater difference between the Jaredite and Nephite phonemic systems than he had previously supposed. He wondered how this was possible, since one might assume that both were taken from the Nephite abridgement, which, being written in but one writing system, could not accurately have illustrated two separate sound systems. That is, one would expect that Moroni, when transliterating Jaredite proper names in his abridgement of the Book of Ether, would have approximated their sounds to sounds already found in his own language. However, after much pondering on the dilemma, Tvedtnes proposed a very plausible solution:

It had to do with Joseph Smith’s transliteration and not Moroni’s. The Prophet, we must recall, used a divine instrument (the Urim and Thummim) to translate the Book of Mormon. Certainly this instrument would have been capable of transliterating the Jaredite names, for they were in their original form in Ether, rather than in their Nephite form as adapted by Moroni.

Thus the stage was set for some analysis to prove this hypothesis. But before beginning any analysis, there were some important decisions that he had to make:

1

These had to do with the biblical names occurring in the Book of Mormon. Should they be included in the analysis, or not? Obviously, if they were names used by the Book of Mormon peoples in reference to persons and places in their new-found homeland, it would be best to include them. Therefore, I decided to retain biblical names actually used as Nephite or Jaredite names, while eliminating from the list all names referring to characters or places named directly in biblical [brass plates or prophetic] references.

Tvedtnes then provides a list of names used in his analysis.

JAREDITE NAMES: In both the Nephite and Jaredite lists he deleted the generic names ending with –ite. He also placed a “(B)” after names that occurred in the Bible.

1.Aaron (B) 23. Ether (B) 44. Nimrah (B) 2. Ablom 24. Gilead (B) 45. Nimrod (B) 3. Agosh 25. Gilgah 46. Noah (B) 4. Ahah 26. Gilgal (B) 47. Ogath 5. Akish 27. Heathom 48. Omer (B) 6. Amgid 28. Heshlon 49. Orihah 7. Amnigaddah 29. Heth (B) 50. Pagag 8. Cohor 30. Jacom 51. Ramah (B) 9. Corn 31. Jared (B) 52. Riplakish 10. Cornnor 32. Kib 53. Ripliancurn 11. Coriantor 33. Kim 54. Seth (B) 12. Coriantum 34. Kimnor 55. Shared 13. Coriantumr 35. Kish (B) 56. Shelern 14. Corihor 36. Levi (B) 57. Shez 15. Cororn’ 37. Lib 58. Shiblon 16. Cumon 38. Mahah 59. Shim 17. Curelom 39. Mahonri 60. Shiz 18. Deseret Moriancumr ** 61. Shule 19. Emer 40. Moriancurner 62. Shurr 20. Ephraim (B) 41. Morianton 63. Zerin 21. Esrom (B) 42. Moron 22. Ethem 43. Nehor

*Appears as Comm in one place in the RLDS version.

** Called the “brother of Jared’ in the Book of Mormon. His name was given by revelation to Joseph Smith (see Alma P. Burton, Discourses of Joseph Smith, 1956, pp. 181, 206. See also G Reynolds, “The Jaredites,” Juvenile

Instructor 27:282 and Improvement Era 8:705.)

2

By determining the environments of each of the consonants and vowels in the Jaredite proper names (including place-names, some of which may be Nephite), Tvedtnes inferred the following phonemic pattern:

JAREDITE PHONEMES

STOPS: p t k b d g FRICATIVES: s s h z RESONANTS: m n r l VOWELS: I u e o a

JAREDITE ALLOPHONES

Allophones are as follows: /k/ has allophones [k], which occurs before hi (Nos. 32, 33, 34, 35, 5, 52), and [c], which occurs before /0/ and ml (Nos.8 through 17, 30, 39, 40, 53); lu has allophones [j], which occurs initially (Nos. 30, 31), as in the transliteration of biblical names (i.e., [y~), and [ii, which occurs elsewhere. It is noteworthy that /u/ occurs only before the resonants (Nos. 12, 13, 16, 17, 39, 40, 53, 61, 62). However, because the other vowels also occur before resonants, phonemic status must be accorded to /u/.

After much analysis, Tvedtnes proposed that the proper names of the Jaredites as recorded in the Book of Mormon seem to be drawn from the Akkadian and Sumerian languages, confirming the Mesopotamian origin of that earlier people. It might be noted here that Joseph Smith, the “translator” of the Nephite record in the 1820s, could not possibly have had knowledge of those extinct Mesopotamian languages (they did not become known to scholars until after the decipherment of the ancient cuneiform writing of Mesopotamia in the mid-nineteenth century).

NEPHITE PROPER NAMES: We come now to Tvedtnes’ examination of the Nephite proper names. Some of these, being biblical, are marked (B). Others are clearly Jaredite, and some suspected Jaredite names. These are marked (J).

NEPHITE NAMES

1. Aaron (B) (J) 12. Amlici 23. Amulon 2. Abinadi 13. Ammah 24. Angola 3. 14. Ammaron (J) 25. Ani-Anti 4. Abish 15. Ammon (B) 26. Anti-Nephi-Lehi 5. Aha 16. Ammonihah 27. Antiomno 6. Alma 17. Ammoron (J) 28. Antion 7. Amalaki 18. Amnihu (J?) 29. Antionah 8. Amalickiah 19. Amnor (J?) 30. Antionum 9. Amaron (J) 20. Amoron (J) 31. Antipara 10. Aminadab (B) 21. Amos (B) 32. Antipas (B) 11. Aminadi 22. Amulek 33. Antipus

3

34. Antum (J?) 73. Isaiah (B) 113. Middoni 35. Archaeantus 74. Ishmael (B) 114. Midian (B) 36. Benjamin (B) 75. Jacob (B) 115. Minon 37. Boaz (B) 76. Jacobugath 116. Mocum (J?) 38. Camenihah (J) 77. 117. Morianton (J) RLDS: Cumenihah 78. Jashon 118. Moriantum (J) 39. Cezoram 79. Jeremiah (B) 119. Mormon (J?) 40. 80. Jershon 120. Moroni (J) 41. Corianton (J) 81. Jerusalem (B) 121. Moronihah 42. Coriantumr (J) 82. Jonas (B) 122. Mosiah 43. Cumeni (J) 83. Joneam RLDS: 123. Mulek RLDS: 44. Cumorah (J?) Jeneum sometimes, Mulok 45. David (B) 84. Jordan (B) 124. Muloki 46. Emron (J?) 85. Joseph (B) 125. Nahom 47. Enos (B) 86. Josh 126. Neas 48. Ezias (cf. D&C 87. Joshua (B) 127. Nehor (J?) 84:12-13) 88. Judea (B) 128. Nephi 49. Ezrom 89. Kishkumen (J) 129. Nephihah 50. Gad (B) 90. Korihor (J) 130. Neum 51. Gadiandi (J?) 91. Kumen (J) 131. Noah (B) 52. Gadianton (J) 92. Kumenonhi (J) 132. Omner 53. Gadiomnah (J?) 93. Laban (B) 133. Omni 54. Gazelem (cf. D&C 94. Lachoneus 134. Onidah 78:9) 95. Lamah 135. Onihah 55. Gid RLDS: Lama 136. Onti 56. Giddianhi (J?) 96. Laman 137. Paanchi 57. Giddonah 97. Lamoni 138. Pachus 58. Gideon (B) 98. Leah (B) 139. Pacumeni (J) 59. Gidgiddonah 99. Lehi (B) 140. Pahoran 60. Gidgiddoni 100. Lehi-Nephi 141. Rabbanah 61. Gilgal (B) (J?) 101. Lehonti 142. Rameumptum 62. Gimgimno 102. Lemuel (B) 143. Riplah (J?) 63. Hagoth 103. Liahona 144. Sam 64. Helam (B) 104. Limhah 145. Samuel (B) 65. Helaman 105. Limber 146. Sariah 66. Helem (B) 106. Limhi 147. Seantum 67. Helorum 107. Limnah 148. Sebus 68. Hem 108. Luram 149. Seezoram 69. Hermounts 109. Manti 150. Senine 70. Himni 110. Mathoni 151. Senum 71. Irreantum 111. Mathonihah 152. Seon 72. Isabel 112. Melek 153. Shazar

4

154. Shem (B) 165. Shimnilom (J?) 176. Zeezrom 155. Shemlon (J?) 166. Shum 177. Zemnarihah 156. Shemnon (J?) 167. Sidom 178. Zenephi 157. Sherem 168. Sidon (B) 179. Zeniff 158. Sherrizah 169. Siron 180. Zenock 159. Sheum 170. Teancum (J?) 181. Zenos 160. Shiblom (J?) 171. Teomner 182. Zerahemnah 161. Shiblon (J) 172. Timothy (B) 183. Zeram 162. Shiblum (J?) 173. Tubaloth 184. ziff 163. Shilom 174. Zarahemla 185. Zion (B) 164. Shim (J?) 175. Zedekiah (B) 186. Zoram

*Nephi does not occur in the Bible, but it does occur in the Apocrypha (2 Maccabees 1:36).

NEPHITE PHONEMES

STOPS: p t k c(q) b d g FRICATIVES: s s x(ch) h z RESONANTS: m n r l VOWELS: I u e o a

NEPHITE ALLOPHONES

Allophones are as follows: /p! has allophoiies [~] (ph), which occurs after vowels (Nos. 26, 85, 100, 128, 129, 178), and [p], which occurs elsewhere; /t! has allophones [0] (th), which occurs after vowels (Nos. 63, 76, 110, llh 172, 173), and [t], which occurs elsewhere; ml has allophones [v], which occurs intervocalically (No. 45), and Lu], which occurs elsewhere; /I/ has allophones Li], which occurs initially (Nos. 75 through 88), and [i], which occurs elsewhere.

Tvedtnes writes that with a basic knowledge of Hebrew, one can readily see that the Nephite phonemic system is the same as the Hebrew. Some of the Hebrew phonemes are missing, but this may be accounted for by the fact that we have a selected list of names; in addition, some Hebrew phonemes (as explained above) cannot be transliterated into English.

CONCLUSIONS

In summation, Tvedtnes concludes:

that despite a few minor problems (which would probably not have existed had there been additional names in the lists), the phonemic systems of both Jaredite and Nephite are rather

5

clear, at least so far as we have them represented in the transliteration of Book of Mormon proper names. Some refinement of the analysis presented here [most all of which I have edited out] may be forthcoming from other scholars. In any event, it is hoped that the work already accomplished will be useful in further investigation of the Book of Mormon. We have already shown the effectiveness of Joseph Smith’s system of transliteration and its bearing as evidence of the two major peoples of the Book of Mormon. Further investigation of Book of Mormon proper names will give additional insights into the Record and its original languages.

(Source: John A. Tvedtnes, A Phonemic Analysis of Nephite and Jaredite Proper Names.” Presented at the Twenty- second Annual Symposium on the Archaeology of the Scriptures and Allied Fields, held at Brigham Young University on October 28, 1973.)

In the years since Tvedtnes’ research was presented, the LDS scholarly investigation into Book of Mormon names had been dedicated and continuous. The results have been, and are continually compiled into what is called the Book of Mormon Onomasticon. This site can be accessed on the Internet. There is a “Name Index” where current research results about each name in the Book of Mormon can be seen with just a couple of clicks with the mouse. The reader can click on the first letter of the name they are searching on the following list. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

If, for example, they are searching for the name “Alma,” they would click on the letter “A“. A list of names, all beginning with the letter “A” will appear, from which they would click on the name “Alma.” Information relative to the etymology of the name is documented along with a bibliography.

In 2011, Sharon Black and Brad Wilcox, both writing educators and authors of fiction themselves, extensively examined the names in the Book of Mormon from a fictional writer’s perspective. They write:

Many successful fiction writers who choose and invent names for their characters claim name selection is an extremely important and difficult process. (Scott Nicholson, “What’s in a Name?” Fiction Factor: The Online Magazine for Fiction Writers; personal communication with Michael Tunnell, Chris Crowe, Shannon Hale, Brandon Mull, Chris Stewart, and Dean Hughes, February-May 2010.) Literary name specialist Leonard Ashley asserted, “Names require serious and sensitive handling.” (Leonard F. Ashley, “Mudpies which Endure: Onomastics as a Tool of Literary Criticism,” in Names in Literature: Essays from Literary Onomastics Studies, ed. Grace Alvarez-Altman and Frederick M. Burelback. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1987, p. 28.)

University professors Black and Wilcox write the following about their study:

We have grouped our findings into five categories mentioned by all the authors whose works or words we consulted. Interestingly enough, Joseph smith does not appear to have followed any of these conventions. . . . The 337 names included by Joseph Smith in the Book of Mormon (188 of which had never been heard of or written before) seem to violate all the rules for choosing fictional names.

6

(Sharon Black and Brad Wilcox, “188 Unexplainable Names: Book of Mormon Names No Fiction Writer Would Choose,” Religious Educator 12, no. 2 ( 2011): 119-133.)

On the FairMormon website they write:

Many Book of Mormon names are not found in the Bible, and were unknown to Joseph Smith. Yet, these names have meaning in ancient languages and/or have been found as actual names from ancient history. These “hits” provide additional evidence that the Book of Mormon is indeed an ancient record.

They follow this statement with an extensive list with website addresses under the banner:

“EXAMPLES OF AUTHENTIC ANCIENT BOOK OF MORMON NAMES”

I will conclude by saying that all the above evidence is presented in a detailed scholarly manner not just to counter the anti-Mormon claims (i.e. that the Book of Mormon names were either found in the Bible, or simply made up by changing syllables or endings), but to invite readers to open their heart to the message of the Book of Mormon.

I will say to these readers of the Book of Mormon that they can either accept this opportunity to gain more knowledge of the Savior and his gospel plan, or they can reject it. For those who choose to reject this opportunity, I would remind them of the prophet Alma’s words:

He that will harden his heart, the same receiveth the lesser portion of the word; and he that will not harden his heart, to him is given the greater portion of the word, until it is given unto him to know the mysteries of God, until he knows them in full. And they that will harden their hearts, to them is given the lesser portion of the word until they know nothing concerning his mysteries; and then they are taken captive by the devil, and led by his will down to destruction. (Alma 12:10-11)

7