Arxiv:2012.15102V2 [Hep-Ph] 13 May 2021 T > Tc

Confinement of Fermions in Tachyon Matter at Finite Temperature Adamu Issifu,1, ∗ Julio C.M. Rocha,1, y and Francisco A. Brito1, 2, z 1Departamento de F´ısica, Universidade Federal da Para´ıba, Caixa Postal 5008, 58051-970 Jo~aoPessoa, Para´ıba, Brazil 2Departamento de F´ısica, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande Caixa Postal 10071, 58429-900 Campina Grande, Para´ıba, Brazil We study a phenomenological model that mimics the characteristics of QCD theory at finite temperature. The model involves fermions coupled with a modified Abelian gauge field in a tachyon matter. It reproduces some important QCD features such as, confinement, deconfinement, chiral symmetry and quark-gluon-plasma (QGP) phase transitions. The study may shed light on both light and heavy quark potentials and their string tensions. Flux-tube and Cornell potentials are developed depending on the regime under consideration. Other confining properties such as scalar glueball mass, gluon mass, glueball-meson mixing states, gluon and chiral condensates are exploited as well. The study is focused on two possible regimes, the ultraviolet (UV) and the infrared (IR) regimes. I. INTRODUCTION Confinement of heavy quark states QQ¯ is an important subject in both theoretical and experimental study of high temperature QCD matter and quark-gluon-plasma phase (QGP) [1]. The production of heavy quarkonia such as the fundamental state ofcc ¯ in the Relativistic Heavy Iron Collider (RHIC) [2] and the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) [3] provides basics for the study of QGP. Lattice QCD simulations of quarkonium at finite temperature indicates that J= may persists even at T = 1:5Tc [4] i.e. a temperature beyond the deconfinement temperature. However, in simple models such as the one under consideration, confinement is obtained at T < Tc, deconfinement and QGP phase at T ≥ Tc. Several approaches of finite temperature QCD has been studied over some period now, but the subject still remain opened because there is no proper understanding on how to consolidate the various different approaches [5{10]. Ever since the Debye screening of heavy QQ¯ potential was put forward [11], leading to the suppression of quarkonia states such as J= . Attention has been directed to investigations to understand the behavior of QQ¯ at the deconfined phase by non relativistic calculations [12{16] of the effective potential or lattice QCD calculations [4{8, 17]. We will study the behavior of light quarks such as up (u), down (d) and strange (s) quarks and also heavy quarks such as charm (c), and other heavier ones with temperature (T ). We will elaborate on the net confining potential, vector potential, scalar potential energy, string tension, scalar glueball masses, glueball-meson mixing states and gluon condensate with temperature. Additionally, confinement of quarks at a finite temperature is an important phenomenon for understanding QGP phase. This phase of matter is believed to have formed few milliseconds after the Big Bang before binding to form protons and neutrons. Consequently, the study of this phase of matter is necessary in understanding the early universe. However, creating it in laboratory poses a great challenge to physicists. Because immensely high energy is needed to break the bond between hadrons to form free particles as it existed at the time. Also, the plasma, when formed, has a short lifetime, so they decay quickly to elude detection and analyses. Some theoretical work has been done in tracing the signature of plasma formation in series of heavy ion collisions. Nonetheless, a phenomenological model that throws light on the possible ways of creating this matter is necessary. In this model, the QGP is expected to be created at extremely high energy and density by regulating temperature, arXiv:2012.15102v2 [hep-ph] 13 May 2021 T > Tc. Aside, these specific motivations for this paper, all others pointed out in [18, 19] are also relevant to this continuation. This paper is meant to compliment the first two papers in this series [18, 19]. Particularly, it is a continuation of [18]. We will try as much as possible to maintain the notations in [18] in order to make it easy to connect the two. That notwithstanding, we will redefine some of the terms for better clarity to this paper when necessary. Generally, we will investigate how thermal fluctuations affect confinement of the fermions at various temperature distribution regimes. The Lagrangian adopted here has the same structure as the one used in [18], so we will not repeat the discussions. ∗Electronic address: [email protected] yElectronic address: [email protected] zElectronic address: [email protected] 2 Even though strong interactions are known to be born out of non-Abelian gauge field theory, no one has been able to compute confining potentials through this formalism. Therefore, several phenomenological models have been relied upon to describe this phenomenon. Common among which are linear and Cornell potential models. Bound states of heavy quarks form part of the most relevant parameters for understanding QCD in high-energy hadronic collisions together with the properties of QGP. As a results, several experimental groups such as CLEO, LEP, CDF, D0, Belle and NA5 have produced data and currently ongoing experiments at BaBar, ATLAS, CMS and LHCb are producing and are expected to produce more precise data in the near future [20{26]. The paper is organized as follows: In Sec. II we present the model and further calculate the associated potentials and string tensions in the ultraviolet (UV) and the infrared (IR) regimes. In Sec. III we present the technique for introducing temperature into the model. We divide sectionIV into three subsections where we elaborate on vector potential in Sec.IVA, scalar potential energy in Sec.IVB, the quark and gluon condensates in Sec.IVC and chiral condensate in Sec.IVD. In Sec.V we present our findings and conclusions. II. THE MODEL We start with the Lagrangian density 1 1 L = − G(φ)F F µν + @ φ∂µφ − V (φ) − ¯ (iγµ@ + qγµA − m G(φ)) ; (1) 4 µν 2 µ µ µ q with a potential given as 1 V (φ) = [(αφ)2 − 1]2: (2) 2 The Lagrangian together with the potential and tachyon condensation governed by the color dielectric function G(φ) and dynamics of the scalar field produces the required QCD characteristics. The equations of motion are 1 @G(φ) @V (φ) @G(φ) @ @µφ + F µν F + − ¯m = 0; (3) µ 4 @φ µν @φ q @φ µ µ − (iγ @µ + qγ Aµ) + mqG(φ) = 0 and (4) µν ¯ ν @µ[G(φ)F ] = − qγ : (5) where µ, ν = 0; 1; 2; 3. We are interested in studying static confining potentials that confine the electric flux generated in the model framework, leaving out the magnetic flux which will not be necessary for the current study. With this µν j0 2 in mind, we choose magnetic field components Fij = 0, such that F Fµν = −F Fj0 = 2E and the current density jν = ¯qγν restricted to charge density, i.e., jν = (ρ,~0), where ρ = q=((4=3)πR3). Thus, in spherical coordinates Eq.(5) becomes λ E = ; (6) r r2G(φ) 1 where λ = q=4π"0. Expanding Eq.(3) in spherical coordinates, we obtain d2φ 2 dφ @ λ2 1 1 + = V (φ) + − ¯m V (φ) (7) dr2 r dr @φ 2 V (φ) r4 q [1] It is important to state at this point that the color dielectric function and the potential are related as G(φ) = (2πα0)2V (φ)[27], where α0 is the Regge slop with dimension of length squared. So it absorbs the dimension of the potential rendering the G(φ) dimensionless. But we set (2πα0) = 1 throughout the paper for simplicity. 3 we set G(φ) = (2πα0)2V (φ) and ignore the term in the order λ2. Shifting the vacuum of the potential such that φ(r) ! φ0 + η, where η(r) is a small perturbation about the vacuum φ0 = 1/α. We can express Eq.(7) as 2 2 r η = 4α (1 − qmqδ(~r))η: (8) We can also determine the bosonic mass from the relation, @2V m2 = j = 4α2: (9) φ @φ2 φ0 Also, we define the Dirac Delta function such that, 8 1 3 < lim ; if r ≤ R δ(~r) = 4π R!0 R3 ; (10) :0; r > R where R is the radius of the hadron and r is the inter particle separation distance between the quarks. Now developing the Laplacian in Eq.(8) for particles inside the hadron gives 2 2 2 r η = (mφ − qmq)η; (11) here, we have set 1=3 3m2 (2πα0)2 ! R = φ : (12) 4mqπ Similar expression can be seen in [28, 29], wherep the mass of the tachyonic mode is determined to be inversely related to 2 0 0 2 the Regge slope i.e. M / 1/α and R / α . Accordingly, mφ can be identified as the scalar glueball mass obtained from bound state of gluons (quenched approximation) through the tachyon potential V (φ). Thus, the tachyonic field φ determines the dynamics of the gluons. Expanding, Eq.(11) leads to 2 η00 + η0 + Kη = 0; (13) r 2 2 where K = qmq − mφ. This equation has two separate solutions representing two different regimes i.e. the infrared (IR) and the ultraviolet (UV) regimes, p cosh(p2jKjr) sin( 2Kr) η(r) = and η(r) = p for r ≤ R; (14) αrp2jKj αr 2K respectively. We can now determine the confinement potential from the electromagnetic potential Z Vc(r) = ∓ Erdr; (15) where Er is the electric field modified by the color dielectric function G(r). From Eq.(6) we can write, λ E = : (16) r r2G(r) With the shift in the vacuum, φ ! η + φ0, the tachyon potential and the color dielectric function takes the form 1 V (η) = G(η) = V (φ)j + V 0(φ)j η + V 00(φ)j η2 φ0 φ0 2 φ0 m2 = φ η2; (17) 2 and the net confining potential becomes, h i q 2 2 q 2 2 (mφ + mq) tanh 2(mφ + mq)r Vc(r; mq) = −λ p : (18) 2 4 Here, we choose the negative part of Eq.(15) corresponding to the potential of antiparticle, consequently, we choose q = −1 corresponding to an anti-color gluon charge.

Load more