DOCSLIB.ORG

'Honey Gold' Mango

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
'Honey Gold' Mango Improving fruit quality and profitability of ‘Honey Gold’ mango Ted Winston Tropical Horticultural Consulting Pty Ltd Project Number: MG10009 MG10009 This report is published by Horticulture Australia Ltd to pass on information concerning horticultural research and development undertaken for the mango industry. The research contained in this report was funded by Horticulture Australia Ltd with the financial support of Pinata Farms Pty Ltd. All expressions of opinion are not to be regarded as expressing the opinion of Horticulture Australia Ltd or any authority of the Australian Government. The Company and the Australian Government accept no responsibility for any of the opinions or the accuracy of the information contained in this report and readers should rely upon their own enquiries in making decisions concerning their own interests. ISBN 0 7341 3334 0 Published and distributed by: Horticulture Australia Ltd Level 7 179 Elizabeth Street Sydney NSW 2000 Telephone: (02) 8295 2300 Fax: (02) 8295 2399 © Copyright 2014 HAL MG10009 (31/05/2014) Improving fruit quality and profitability of ‘Honey Gold’™ Mango E. C. Winston et al. FINAL REPORT Tropical Horticultural Consulting P/L, Mission Beach Qld 4852 Improving fruit quality and profitability of ‘Honey Gold’ ™ Mango HAL PROJECT NUMBER: MG10009 FINAL REPORT 31 May 2014 Project Leader: E C (Ted) Winston, Tropical Horticultural Consulting Pty Ltd., 60 Mission Drive, Mission Beach, Qld, 4852. Phone (07) 40 688796; Mobile 0412534514; Email [email protected] Project Personnel: Dr. Peter Hofman, Senior Principal Horticulturist, Queensland Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, PO Box 5083 SCMS, Nambour Qld, 4560, Phone (07) 5453 5968 Fax (07) 5453 5901 Mobile 0407 173 608; Email [email protected] Dr. Andrew Macnish, Senior Horticulturist, Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, PO Box 5083 SCMS, Nambour Qld, 4560, Email: [email protected] Prof Daryl Joyce , Agri-Science Queensland, DAFF, GPO Box 267, Brisbane Qld 4001, and The University of Queensland, Gatton, Qld 4343. Mob 0428867804; email [email protected] Dr Roberto Marques, past Research Horticulturist, Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, PO Box 5083 SCMS, Nambour 4560 Gavin Scurr, Managing Director, Piñata Farms Pty Ltd. and others, PO Box 12, Wamuran, Qld, 4512, Phone (07) 54974295; Fax (07) 54974296; Mobile 0407714549; Email [email protected] Rebecca Scurr, ‘Honey Gold’ Coordinator, Pinata Farms Pty. Ltd and Others. PO Box 12, Wamuran, Qld. 4512, Mobile 0408199313, Email: [email protected] ‘Honey Gold’ is a relatively new mango cultivar. Market demand is strong and growing with both local and export markets being developed by Piñata Farms Pty Ltd. An earlier project MG06022 resolved several agronomic issues, including inconsistent flowering in tropical environments and low yield due to excessive fruit drop. However MG06022 identified other constraints impacting on grower profitability: (i) low percentage packout of premium grade fruit (ii) underskin browning, (iii) need for a good crop forecasting model, and (iv) need to develop alternative markets for non premium fruit. The objectives of MG10009 were to develop suitable production and handling methodologies to reduce these issues and improve grower profitability. Acknowledgements: This project has been funded by HAL using voluntary contributions from Piñata Farms P/L and matched funds from the Australian Government. Results of the work on ‘Honey Gold’ would not have been possible without Piñata Farms P/L and suggestions of the ‘Honey Gold’ growers. The support and dedication of Queensland Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries is gratefully acknowledged. The assistance of Lindsey Hewitt and Michael Page of Pinata was invaluable. Disclaimer Any recommendations contained in this publication do not necessarily represent current HAL Limited policy. No person should act on the basis of the contents of this publication, whether as to maters of fact or opinion or other content, without first obtaining specific, independent professional advice in respect of the matters set out in this publication MG10009; Honey Gold mango final report i CONTENTS CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 MEDIA SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................... 3 TECHNICAL SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................... 4 1. INCREASING THE PERCENT PACKOUT OF PREMIUM GRADE FRUIT ................................ 6 1.1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 6 1.2. Materials and methods ......................................................................................................... 7 1.2.1. Downgrades protocol .................................................................................................... 7 1.2.2. Year 1 ............................................................................................................................ 7 1.2.3. Years 2 and 3 ................................................................................................................ 9 1.3. Results and Discussion ........................................................................................................ 9 1.3.1. 2011/12 Year 1 .............................................................................................................. 9 1.3.2. 2012/13 Year 2 ............................................................................................................ 10 1.3.3. 2013/14 Year 3 ............................................................................................................ 13 1.3.4. Three year results ........................................................................................................ 15 1.4. Summary and recommendations ........................................................................................ 17 2. CROP FORECASTING ........................................................................................................................ 18 2.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 18 2.2. Materials and methods ....................................................................................................... 19 2.2.1. Heat sums .................................................................................................................... 19 2.2.2. Dry Matters ................................................................................................................. 21 2.3. Results and Discussion ...................................................................................................... 21 2.3.1. Heat Sums ................................................................................................................... 21 2.3.2. Dry Matters ................................................................................................................. 27 2.3.3. Days to 1500 units maturity and to harvest ................................................................ 30 2.4. Summary and Recommendations ...................................................................................... 30 3. UNDER SKIN BROWNING................................................................................................................. 32 3.1. The standard USB test ....................................................................................................... 34 3.1.1. Summary ..................................................................................................................... 34 3.1.2. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 34 3.1.3. Materials and methods ................................................................................................ 35 3.1.4. Results and discussion ................................................................................................ 37 3.2. Production factors and USB (USB Survey) ....................................................................... 39 3.2.1. Materials and methods ................................................................................................ 39 3.2.2. Results and discussion ................................................................................................ 40 3.3. Nutrition and water stress .................................................................................................. 46 3.3.1. Materials and methods ................................................................................................ 46 3.3.2. Results and discussion ................................................................................................ 47 3.4. Fruit position in the canopy ............................................................................................... 47 3.4.1. Materials and methods ................................................................................................ 47 3.4.2. Results and discussion ...............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 5. Organic Orchard
    MucknellAbbey Factsheet #5 Organic Orchard Following the vision laid out in the Land Use Strategy for Mucknell, we are working towards producing most of our food using organic methods, contributing to income generation by selling produce. In February 2011, we planted 31 fruit trees, to form an organic orchard. We sourced most of the trees from Walcot Organic Nursery, in the Vale of Evesham, and the Banns were a gift. We planted separate stands of apples, pears and plums. Crab apples are very good pollinators of all apples, so were planted on the edge of the stand of apples to encourage pollination. We planted Gladstone on a corner, so that its vigorous rootstock is less likely to interfere with the growth of the other trees. We planted other varieties according to their pollination groups, so that Bs are next to A-Cs, Cs are next to B-Ds, etc. We are planning to plant comfrey under the trees, cutting it and leaving it in situ to rot down around the trees as a natural fertiliser. Apple (Malus) 1 Adam's Pearmain 2 Annie Elizabeth 4 C 17 8 D 3 Ashmead's Kernel 30,31 Banns 4 Bountiful 5 Blenheim Orange 1 B 5 CT 6 C 6 Discovery 7 Edward VII 8 Gladstone 9 Grenadier 10 Lord Lambourne N 10 B 2 D 11 Pitmaston Pineapple E 12 Rajka D 13 William Crump 14 Winston R A 9 C 7 E 15 Worcester Pearmain 16 Wyken Pippin G Crab Apple (Malus) 17 Harry Baker N 18 Red Sentinel 30 D Bore 3 D E Plum (Prunus) hole 19 Belle de Louvain H 20 Gage - Cambridge Gage C 21 Marjories Seedling T 31 D 13 D 22 Opal I 23 Pershore Purple K 24 Damson - Shropshire Prune Pear (Pyrus) 25 Beth 11 C 14 D 12 C 26 Beurre Hardy 27 Concorde 28 Louise Bonne of Jersey 29 Worcester Black 15 C 18 16 C 19 C 28 B 29 C 22 C 23 C 26 C 25 D 20 D About Mucknell 21 E Mucknell Abbey is a contemplative monastic community of nuns and monks living under the 27 C Rule of St Benedict and part of the Church of 24 D England.
    [Show full text]
  • 9–2–05 Vol. 70 No. 170 Friday Sept. 2, 2005 Pages
    9–2–05 Friday Vol. 70 No. 170 Sept. 2, 2005 Pages 52283–52892 VerDate Aug 18 2005 19:41 Sep 01, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4710 Sfmt 4710 E:\FR\FM\02SEWS.LOC 02SEWS i II Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2005 The FEDERAL REGISTER (ISSN 0097–6326) is published daily, SUBSCRIPTIONS AND COPIES Monday through Friday, except official holidays, by the Office PUBLIC of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC 20408, under the Federal Register Subscriptions: Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 15) and the regulations of the Administrative Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 Committee of the Federal Register (1 CFR Ch. I). The Assistance with public subscriptions 202–512–1806 Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 is the exclusive distributor of the official General online information 202–512–1530; 1–888–293–6498 edition. Periodicals postage is paid at Washington, DC. Single copies/back copies: The FEDERAL REGISTER provides a uniform system for making Paper or fiche 202–512–1800 available to the public regulations and legal notices issued by Assistance with public single copies 1–866–512–1800 Federal agencies. These include Presidential proclamations and (Toll-Free) Executive Orders, Federal agency documents having general FEDERAL AGENCIES applicability and legal effect, documents required to be published Subscriptions: by act of Congress, and other Federal agency documents of public interest. Paper or fiche 202–741–6005 Documents are on file for public inspection in the Office of the Assistance with Federal agency subscriptions 202–741–6005 Federal Register the day before they are published, unless the issuing agency requests earlier filing.
    [Show full text]
  • Andre Malraux's Devotion to Caesarism Erik Meddles Regis University
    Regis University ePublications at Regis University All Regis University Theses Spring 2010 Partisan of Greatness: Andre Malraux's Devotion to Caesarism Erik Meddles Regis University Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.regis.edu/theses Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Meddles, Erik, "Partisan of Greatness: Andre Malraux's Devotion to Caesarism" (2010). All Regis University Theses. 544. https://epublications.regis.edu/theses/544 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by ePublications at Regis University. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Regis University Theses by an authorized administrator of ePublications at Regis University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Regis University Regis College Honors Theses Disclaimer Use of the materials available in the Regis University Thesis Collection (“Collection”) is limited and restricted to those users who agree to comply with the following terms of use. Regis University reserves the right to deny access to the Collection to any person who violates these terms of use or who seeks to or does alter, avoid or supersede the functional conditions, restrictions and limitations of the Collection. The site may be used only for lawful purposes. The user is solely responsible for knowing and adhering to any and all applicable laws, rules, and regulations relating or pertaining to use of the Collection. All content in this Collection is owned by and subject to the exclusive control of Regis University and the authors of the materials. It is available only for research purposes and may not be used in violation of copyright laws or for unlawful purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • A Manual Key for the Identification of Apples Based on the Descriptions in Bultitude (1983)
    A MANUAL KEY FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF APPLES BASED ON THE DESCRIPTIONS IN BULTITUDE (1983) Simon Clark of Northern Fruit Group and National Orchard Forum, with assistance from Quentin Cleal (NOF). This key is not definitive and is intended to enable the user to “home in” rapidly on likely varieties which should then be confirmed in one or more of the manuals that contain detailed descriptions e.g. Bunyard, Bultitude , Hogg or Sanders . The varieties in this key comprise Bultitude’s list together with some widely grown cultivars developed since Bultitude produced his book. The page numbers of Bultitude’s descriptions are included. The National Fruit Collection at Brogdale are preparing a list of “recent” varieties not included in Bultitude(1983) but which are likely to be encountered. This list should be available by late August. As soon as I receive it I will let you have copy. I will tabulate the characters of the varieties so that you can easily “slot them in to” the key. Feedback welcome, Tel: 0113 266 3235 (with answer phone), E-mail [email protected] Simon Clark, August 2005 References: Bultitude J. (1983) Apples. Macmillan Press, London Bunyard E.A. (1920) A Handbook of Hardy Fruits; Apples and Pears. John Murray, London Hogg R. (1884) The Fruit Manual. Journal of the Horticultural Office, London. Reprinted 2002 Langford Press, Wigtown. Sanders R. (1988) The English Apple. Phaidon, Oxford Each variety is categorised as belonging to one of eight broad groups. These groups are delineated using skin characteristics and usage i.e. whether cookers, (sour) or eaters (sweet).
    [Show full text]
  • Mango Production in Pakistan; Copyright © 1
    MAGO PRODUCTIO I PAKISTA BY M. H. PAHWAR Published by: M. H. Panhwar Trust 157-C Unit No. 2 Latifabad, Hyderabad Mango Production in Pakistan; Copyright © www.panhwar.com 1 Chapter No Description 1. Mango (Magnifera Indica) Origin and Spread of Mango. 4 2. Botany. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 9 3. Climate .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 13 4. Suitability of Climate of Sindh for Raising Mango Fruit Crop. 25 5. Soils for Commercial Production of Mango .. .. 28 6. Mango Varieties or Cultivars .. .. .. .. 30 7. Breeding of Mango .. .. .. .. .. .. 52 8. How Extend Mango Season From 1 st May To 15 th September in Shortest Possible Time .. .. .. .. .. 58 9. Propagation. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 61 10. Field Mango Spacing. .. .. .. .. .. 69 11. Field Planting of Mango Seedlings or Grafted Plant .. 73 12. Macronutrients in Mango Production .. .. .. 75 13. Micro-Nutrient in Mango Production .. .. .. 85 14. Foliar Feeding of Nutrients to Mango .. .. .. 92 15. Foliar Feed to Mango, Based on Past 10 Years Experience by Authors’. .. .. .. .. .. 100 16. Growth Regulators and Mango .. .. .. .. 103 17. Irrigation of Mango. .. .. .. .. .. 109 18. Flowering how it takes Place and Flowering Models. .. 118 19. Biennially In Mango .. .. .. .. .. 121 20. How to Change Biennially In Mango .. .. .. 126 Mango Production in Pakistan; Copyright © www.panhwar.com 2 21. Causes of Fruit Drop .. .. .. .. .. 131 22. Wind Breaks .. .. .. .. .. .. 135 23. Training of Tree and Pruning for Maximum Health and Production .. .. .. .. .. 138 24. Weed Control .. .. .. .. .. .. 148 25. Mulching .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 150 26. Bagging of Mango .. .. .. .. .. .. 156 27. Harvesting .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 157 28. Yield .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 163 29. Packing of Mango for Market. .. .. .. .. 167 30. Post Harvest Treatments to Mango .. .. .. .. 171 31. Mango Diseases. .. .. .. .. .. .. 186 32. Insects Pests of Mango and their Control .
    [Show full text]
  • A Season Like No Other
    JUNE 2021 / VOLUME FORTY-FOUR 2020... a season like no other PAGE 12 Biosecurity—Emergency Plant Pest Response Deed PAGE 18 Season in review PAGE 20 Mango industry aims high with high-density plantings PAGE 22 WINTER ISSUE Get better fruit quality and shelf life for your mango and tropical fruit with exceptional in-crop disease control from Luna® Sensation Fungicide. NEW Registration • Suits tight harvesting schedule • Aids resistance management • Flexibility to spray over flowering • Complements an IPM strategy For more information visit lunasensation.com.au or speak to your advisor. Luna® is a Registered Trademark of the Bayer Group. Bayer CropScience Pty Ltd ABN 87 000 226 022. Level 1, 8 Redfern Road Hawthorn East VIC 3123, Australia. Technical Enquiries: 1800 804 479 [email protected] BHO0173_Luna_Sensation_Avocado&Mango_210x297_FA.indd 2 19/8/20 5:15 pm CONTENTS 4 CEO & CHAIRMAN REPORTS 6 DIRECTOR REPORTS 8 AMIA & INDUSTRY NEWS Executive team update AMIA AGM AG Visa announced Export information AMIA now a member of Irrigation Australia Increase to minimum wage and other updates ATO Resources QFF updates Major drought reform for Queensland producers New research identifies 12 PR & MARKETING best mango pollinators 2020...a season like no other 18 BIOSECURITY, A wide range of insects visit mango RESEARCH & POLICY flowers, but new research has identified Biosecurity—Emergency Plant Pest Response Deed which of those are the most effective Biosecurity—National Fruit Fly pollinators. Symposium calls for national strategy committment
    [Show full text]
  • 'Honey Gold' Mango Fruit
    Final Report Improving consumer appeal of Honey Gold mango by reducing under skin browning and red lenticel discolouration Peter Hofman The Department of Agriculture and Fisheries (DAF) Project Number: MG13016 MG13016 This project has been funded by Horticulture Innovation Australia Limited with co-investment from Piñata Farms Pty Ltd and funds from the Australian Government. Horticulture Innovation Australia Limited (Hort Innovation) makes no representations and expressly disclaims all warranties (to the extent permitted by law) about the accuracy, completeness, or currency of information in Improving consumer appeal of Honey Gold mango by reducing under skin browning and red lenticel discolouration. Reliance on any information provided by Hort Innovation is entirely at your own risk. Hort Innovation is not responsible for, and will not be liable for, any loss, damage, claim, expense, cost (including legal costs) or other liability arising in any way (including from Hort Innovation or any other person’s negligence or otherwise) from your use or non-use of Improving consumer appeal of Honey Gold mango by reducing under skin browning and red lenticel discolouration, or from reliance on information contained in the material or that Hort Innovation provides to you by any other means. ISBN 978 0 7341 3977 1 Published and distributed by: Horticulture Innovation Australia Limited Level 8, 1 Chifley Square Sydney NSW 2000 Tel: (02) 8295 2300 Fax: (02) 8295 2399 © Copyright 2016 Contents Summary .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Apples Contain No Fat, Sodium Or Cholesterol and Are a Good Source of Fibre
    Apple Varieties There are over 7,500 varieties, here are some of the most popular. Ashmead Kernel, Beauty of Bath, Blenheim Orange, Breaburn, Cox’s Orange Pippin, Crispin, Discovery, Egremont Russet, Elstar, Empire, Fuji, Gala/Royal Gala, Golden Delicious, Granny Smith, Greensleeves, Ida Red, James Grieve, Jonagold, Jonathan, Katy, Kidds Orange Red, Laxton’s Fortune, Laxton’s Superb, McIntosh, Orleans Reinette, Pink Lady, Pomme d’api, Red Delicious, Spartan, Worcester Pearmain, Lord Lambourne, Washington Red, Lord Derby, Red Pippin, Rome Beauty, Starking Sturmer Pippin, Tydeman’s Late, Orange, Winesap, Winston. Apple facts • Apples contain no fat, sodium or cholesterol and are a good source of fibre. • A medium apple is about 80 calories. • They are fat, sodium and cholesterol free. • They float because 25% of their volume is air. • It takes the energy from 50 leaves to produce one apple. • Pomology is the science of growing apples. • In 2005 an apple was grown in Japan and weighed 4lb 1oz. • New York City is nicknamed the big apple. Proverbs • Don’t upset the apple cart • An apple a day keeps the doctor away • Apple of your eye • One bad apple spoils the bunch • The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree • A pear tree cannot bear an apple Jokes 1. What do you get if you cross an apple with a shell fish? A crabapple 2. What kind of apple isn’t an apple? pineapple 3. Why did the farmer hang his raincoats all over his orchard? Someone told him he should get an apple mac 4. What’s worse than finding a worm in your apple? Taking a bite and finding ½ a worm 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Fruit Load Estimation in Mango Orchards – a Method Comparison
    Fruit load estimation in mango orchards – a method comparison J. P. Underwood1, M.M. Rahman2, A. Robson2, K. B. Walsh3, A. Koirala3, Z. Wang3 Abstract—The fruit load of entire mango orchards was been previously described for macadamia and avocado by [1] estimated well before harvest using (i) in-field machine vision on (e.g. R2 = 0.81, 0.68 and 0.72 on three avocado blocks, mobile platforms and (ii) WorldView-3 satellite imagery. For respectively; for 18 trees per block). This remote sensing in-field machine vision, two imaging platforms were utilized, approach allows for a yield forecast of large areas. However, with (a) day time imaging with LiDAR based tree segmentation Robson et al. [1] reported that the VI used and the relationship and multiple views per tree, and (b) night time imaging system slope between that VI and fruit load varied with orchard, using two images per tree. The machine vision approaches necessitating field-work for calibration at each orchard. involved training of neural networks with image snips from one orchard only, followed by use for all other orchards (varying in Machine vision systems for estimation of mango fruit load location and cultivar). Estimates of fruit load per tree achieved on tree have been previously reported by Payne et al. [2] and up to a R2 = 0.88 and a RMSE = 22.5 fruit/tree against harvest Stein et al. [3]. The former study [2] used a night imaging, fruit count per tree (n = 18 trees per orchard). With satellite dual-view approach (two images of each tree, from the two imaging, a regression was established between a number of inter rows), with a report of a coefficient of determination (R2) spectral indices and fruit number for a set (n=18) of trees in each of only 0.74 relative to human count, with fruit number under 2 orchard (example: R = 0.57, RMSE = 22 fruit/tree), and this estimated due to canopy occlusion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Biotechnology in Sindh, Pakistan Farzana Panhwar
    The use of biotechnology in Sindh, Pakistan Farzana Panhwar The use of biotechnology in Sindh, Pakistan to improve Agriculture, its growth and bring Sustainable Development in the country. by Farzana Panhwar Abstract. Sindh has Sub-tropical climate , which is extremely suitable for large number of crops, but the farmers of Sindh are illiterate and they raise crops just by copying each other and do not take a risk with their investment. Due to this practice the local market is full with conventional fruits and vegetable raised here namely : mangoes, guava, grapefruit, lemon, lime, sapodilla, cherimoya, dates, lychee, papaya, melons and zizyphus mauritania. The net result is a few varieties of each fruit growing over short season and a glut of one or another fruit crops, throughout the year, and consequently low prices. Due to mono-culture all diseases, infection , and viral attacks are frequent, due to cover large area under same crop, and its control become difficult. The solution lies in diversification of crops, with extension of harvest season and new cultivars, especially evolved by breeding , tissue culture , genetic engineering and bio-technology. These would be extremely beneficial, to bring sustainability locally and globally. Agriculture is the backbone of our economy as well as of our foreign trade. To strengthen the economy of Pakistan, one should first of all take necessary steps to reform the agricultural system of the country. This can only be done by educating the farmers in the latest method of cultivation ,new developments in agricultural inputs and day to day changes in Agricultural Research arena. If we improve the agricultural sector in Sindh, and improve its economic growth and conditions, this alone can bring the sustainability locally and globally.
    [Show full text]
  • In Field Fruit Sizing Using a Smart Phone Application
    sensors Technical Note In Field Fruit Sizing Using A Smart Phone Application Zhenglin Wang 1 , Anand Koirala 2, Kerry Walsh 2,* , Nicholas Anderson 2 and Brijesh Verma 1 1 Centre for Intelligent Systems, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Queensland 4701, Australia; [email protected] (Z.W.); [email protected] (B.V.) 2 Institute of Future Farming Systems, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Queensland 4701, Australia; [email protected] (A.K.); [email protected] (N.A.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 11 August 2018; Accepted: 26 September 2018; Published: 5 October 2018 Abstract: In field (on tree) fruit sizing has value in assessing crop health and for yield estimation. As the mobile phone is a sensor and communication rich device carried by almost all farm staff, an Android application (“FruitSize”) was developed for measurement of fruit size in field using the phone camera, with a typical assessment rate of 240 fruit per hour achieved. The application was based on imaging of fruit against a backboard with a scale using a mobile phone, with operational limits set on camera to object plane angle and camera to object distance. Image processing and object segmentation techniques available in the OpenCV library were used to segment the fruit from background in images to obtain fruit sizes. Phone camera parameters were accessed to allow calculation of fruit size, with camera to fruit perimeter distance obtained from fruit allometric relationships between fruit thickness and width. Phone geolocation data was also accessed, allowing for mapping fruits of data. Under controlled lighting, RMSEs of 3.4, 3.8, 2.4, and 2.0 mm were achieved in estimation of avocado, mandarin, navel orange, and apple fruit diameter, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Apple Pollination Groups
    Flowering times of apples RHS Pollination Groups To ensure good pollination and therefore a good crop, it is essential to grow two or more different cultivars from the same Flowering Group or adjacent Flowering Groups. Some cultivars are triploid – they have sterile pollen and need two other cultivars for good pollination; therefore, always grow at least two other non- triploid cultivars with each one. Key AGM = RHS Award of Garden Merit * Incompatible with each other ** Incompatible with each other *** ‘Golden Delicious’ may be ineffective on ‘Crispin’ (syn. ‘Mutsu’) Flowering Group 1 Very early; pollinated by groups 1 & 2 ‘Gravenstein’ (triploid) ‘Lord Suffield’ ‘Manks Codlin’ ‘Red Astrachan’ ‘Stark Earliest’ (syn. ‘Scarlet Pimpernel’) ‘Vista Bella’ Flowering Group 2 Pollinated by groups 1,2 & 3 ‘Adams's Pearmain’ ‘Alkmene’ AGM (syn. ‘Early Windsor’) ‘Baker's Delicious’ ‘Beauty of Bath’ (partial tip bearer) ‘Beauty of Blackmoor’ ‘Ben's Red’ ‘Bismarck’ ‘Bolero’ (syn. ‘Tuscan’) ‘Cheddar Cross’ ‘Christmas Pearmain’ ‘Devonshire Quarrenden’ ‘Egremont Russet’ AGM ‘George Cave’ (tip bearer) ‘George Neal’ AGM ‘Golden Spire’ ‘Idared’ AGM ‘Irish Peach’ (tip bearer) ‘Kerry Pippin’ ‘Keswick Codling’ ‘Laxton's Early Crimson’ ‘Lord Lambourne’ AGM (partial tip bearer) ‘Maidstone Favourite’ ‘Margil’ ‘Mclntosh’ ‘Red Melba’ ‘Merton Charm’ ‘Michaelmas Red’ ‘Norfolk Beauty’ ‘Owen Thomas’ ‘Reverend W. Wilks’ ‘Ribston Pippin’ AGM (triploid, partial tip bearer) ‘Ross Nonpareil’ ‘Saint Edmund's Pippin’ AGM (partial tip bearer) ‘Striped Beefing’ ‘Warner's King’ AGM (triploid) ‘Washington’ (triploid) ‘White Transparent’ Flowering Group 3 Pollinated by groups 2, 3 & 4 ‘Acme’ ‘Alexander’ (syn. ‘Emperor Alexander’) ‘Allington Pippin’ ‘Arthur Turner’ AGM ‘Barnack Orange’ ‘Baumann's Reinette’ ‘Belle de Boskoop’ AGM (triploid) ‘Belle de Pontoise’ ‘Blenheim Orange’ AGM (triploid, partial tip bearer) ‘Bountiful’ ‘Bowden's Seedling’ ‘Bramley's Seedling’ AGM (triploid, partial tip bearer) ‘Brownlees Russett’ ‘Charles Ross’ AGM ‘Cox's Orange Pippin’ */** ‘Crispin’ (syn.
    [Show full text]