DOCSLIB.ORG

Avoid "Parallax" Errors of Offse[ Me.&Surz~Ien

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Avoid Measurements have been a somewhat neglected subject in the order and medal field. Because pieces of insignia of the same type are known to vary considerably in size, par- ticularly in an order or medal which has flourished over a long period of time, it has apparently been felt that careful notation of size had no particular point. Only in the named medal area--where careful calipering of the horizontal dia- AVOID "PARALLAX" ERRORS OF meter compared with the near-vertical diameter may reveal OFFSE[ ME.&SURZ~IEN~ READINGS that an original naming has been shaved away to permit re- BY CAREFUL PLAC~[ENT OF THE PIECE BEING MEASURED £}~D BY impressing or reeingraving -- has careful measurement been CORRECT VERTICAL SIGHTING. taken very seriously. Nevertheless, all the facts that can be produced are necessary to a scientific evaluation of any piece being studied, and measurements are an important and easily ascertainable variable which enters into the picture. From th’e prac- tical viewpoint, such a simple factor as determining the proper class of a piece in some cases hangs on a borderline measurement of a millimeter or two. Substitutions of elements or unauthentic additions to a multi-element piece of insignia may likewise be revealed. From the broader viewpoint, as accurate measurement data is accumulated, the millimeter scale can become an important tool in assigning a particular piece of insignia to a certain maker or particular period in time. Going a step further, it is anticipated that later in this series it will be possible to demonstrate that many breast stars have a built- in "time-clock dimension" that will accurately place them in proper chronological sequence by a simple micrometer measurement. Now is the time to accurately measure and record the data for every significant piece in yoq’r’-eollection ! THE CROSS AND THE CRESCENT - Moslem nations have almost invariably avoided using the design of the Christian cross in their orders and decorations, and the European monarchs were formerly equally zealous in avoiding the award to any non- believer of a decoration bearing the Christian emblems. In the Russian Empire, the orders awarded to non-Christians had the effigy or emblem of the Saint replaced by the Russian Imperial eagle, although the Caucasian soldiers objected that they would rather have the figure of a brave man than the picture of a bird on their Cross of St. George. The King of Prussia created a special star-shaped form of the Red Eagle Order to be awarded, instead of the normal white cross, to his Jewish subjects - and soon found that they strongly objected to this distinction. The British also avoided the use of the cross shape when designing awards to be given to their Moslem and Hindu subjects in India; however, they had no objection to decorating the chests of Indian potentates with insignia bearing the images of St. Michael and St. George. When political considerations made it advisable to award the Order of the Garter to the Shah of Persia, a special star was designed which omitted the red Cross of St. George in the center° It is related that King Edward VII took one look at this strange insignia, and promptly tossed it through the nearest porthole of his yacht! (Submitted by James W. Peterson) THE KOREAN MEDAL FOR WAR DEAD FAMILIES - This decoration is awarded by the Republic of Korea to the depend- ents of those who were killed in action or who died of wounds sustained while engaging in actual combat. It consists of a small silver flower placed in the center of a purple cord which is tied into the shape of a cross, of three loops above and longer tasseled ends below. Although the Koreans have a strong antipathy to anything of Japa- nese origin, this decoration bears a strong resemblance to the insignia which is presented by the Shinto priests of the Yasukuni Shrine in To- kyo, to the parents who come to the shrine to pray for the souls of their sons who died in war. (Submitted by James W. Peterson) y The Awards of the Ukraine Part Nr. 6 THE AWARDS FOR THE SICH RIFLEMEN by Dr. George L. Podlusky The Ukrainian Sich Riflemen or the "Ukra[nski Sichovi Striltsi" (U.S.S. for short, or "Usususy") actually have two different awards, each of which are for different periods. Therefore, it is important to note that they are not concurrent in their applications. They are as follows: CROSS OF THE LEGION OF THE UKRAINIAN SICH RIFLEMEN (1914-1918) XPECT 3/[rlOHT TKPA’I’HCbK X Clq, OS X CTPI3/b IB COMBATANTS CROSS OF THE U~INIAN S~CH RIFLEMEN (19iS-1920), ~OM6AT^HTCK~ ~ XPECT YKPA’I WCbKttK ¢I~OB~X CTPi~b~ 18 ~,~ -’~z@ The first we shal’l refer to as the Combat Cross U.S.S., while the other shall be called the Cross of the Legion U.S.S, Once again we must make reference to the awakening of the Ukrain- ian National Spirit within the province of Galicia within the Austro- Hungarian Empire prior to World War I. This led to the formation of various para-military organizations. Prominent among these were the many youth groups such as the "Sich" and the "Falcons". The first Sich group was formed in 1900, and just before the out- break of war in 1914, there were over i000 similar organizations through- out Galicia and Bukovina. It was during the Balkan Wars that the idea arose of the possibility of needing a military force for the success of the Ukrainian National Movement. Therefore, the Ukrainian political leaders decided that, in case a conflict occurred between Austria and Russia, that the Ukraine would take their stand against Russian Imperialism. On 7 Dec. 1912, they de- cided to form a military society called: "Sichevy Striltsi" (Sich Riflemen). The Austrial Government permitted the formation of this organiza- tion, whose regulations were similar to the Polish military organiza- tion "Strzelec" (Riflemen). The first such group was formed in Lviv (Lemberg or Lvov). In March, 1913, more such groups were created all throughout Galicia, to about 96 such formations. On the 28~ of June, 1914, there was a convention with parade of the members of the Sich and Falcons, who were greeted with immense en- thusiasm by the Ukrainian Population. Particularly, the armed units provoked m~ch such reaction. The same day, however, the fatal shots rang out i~ Sarajevo, killing the Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his Con- sort. Consequently, Austria declared war on Serbia 28 July 1914 and Rus- sia on Austria on 5 August. On 2 August, the Ukrainian political par- ties consolidated in one supreme Ukrainian Council, which also took over the Ukrainian Army Organizations. In order to de so, the Ukrainian War Committee was called and they in turn requested the Austrian military authorities to free some Ukrainian officers from active duty to organize a Ukrainian Legion. However, only 16 active officers and a few non-commissioned offi- cers were actually supplied to the Legion. On 6 August 1914, the War Committee together with the Supreme Ukrainian Council issued a procla- mation to the Ukrainian people of Galicia to join the Ukrainian Sich Riflemen. Even before this proclamation was issued, masses of Ukrain- ian youths volunteered in Lemberg and other provincial cities. Dona- tions in both money and goods were also forthcoming spontaneously. Thus, in this beginning, the organization and efforts to obtain troops and equipment for the U.S.S. depended strictly upon the resources of the people. Austria had always had a double standard in their policy towards the Ukrainians and this held true in the relations with the U.S.S. Although permission to form this unit was given, no other sup- port was provided. In actuality, the Austrian Military Command did net like the entire idea. 8 Due to the approaching Russian armies, Lviv was evacuated. On 30 August, the UoS.S. moved to Stryj. Of the 28,000 volunteers, only 2500 were permitted by the Austrian government to serve in the unit. From Stryj, they moved to the Carpatho-Ukraine for further training in Gor- onda and Mezeterebesh (Uk.: Strabychiw). Each 1000 men were divided into a battalion, with 500 in a reserve half-battalion. The 1st batn. was under Capt. M. Voloshyn and the 2nd under Capt. H. Kossak. The ½ barn. was under S. Shvchevych. The U.S.S. was given to the XXV Corps (at that time called "operatives militaer-kommando in Lemberg"), commanded by Gen. Hoffmann. The 1st commander of the Legion was Theodore Roshankovskyj (in Lemberg), while in training from 18 Aug. 1914 they were under M. Halushchynsky. After a very short period of training, they were in their first engagement near Sianki, 27 Sept. 1914 under W. Didushko, having been sent to the Carpathian Mr. front on l0 Sept. Committed to the defence of Hungary, they were part of the 2nd Army, and then the XXV~ Corps (14 Sept. 1914)~ mentioned above. During this time small organized groups of 20 were sent behind the lines for recon- naisance and partisian activity. This was done, but with heavy losses. All along the general tendency was to always keep the battalions divi- ded, so as to limit any power they might employ as a cohesive unit with possible autonony. With the Russian October offensive of 1914, the XXV~ Corps along with 3 well-equipped German divisions formed the Army of the South under Gen. Linzingen. The Germans were very friendly with the Ukrainians and during the actual combat the value of the U.S.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download File
    BEYOND RESENTMENT Mykola Riabchuk Vasyl Kuchabsky, Western Ukraine in Conflict with Poland and Bolshevism, 1918-1923. Translated from the German by Gus Fagan. Edmomton and Toronto: Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies Press, 2009. 361 pp. + 6 maps. t might be a risky enterprise to publish a historical of Western Ukrainians to establish their independent monograph written some eighty years ago, which at republic on the ruins of the Habsburg empire—in full the time addressed the very recent developments of line with the prevailing Wilsonian principle of national I1918-1923—this would seem to be much more suited toself-determination, the right presumably granted by the lively memoirs than a cool-blooded analysis and archival victorious Entente to all East European nations. Western research. Indeed, since 1934 when Vasyl Kuchabsky's Ukraine is in the center of both the title and the narrative, Die Westukraine im Kampfe mit Polen und dem and this makes both the book and its translation rather Bolschewismus in den Jahren 1918-1923 was published important, since there are still very few “Ukrainocentric” in Germany in a small seminar series, a great number of accounts of these events, which though not necessarily books and articles on the relevant topics have appeared, opposing the dominant Polish and Russian perspectives, and even a greater number of archival documents, letters at least provide some check on the myths and biases and memoirs have become accessible to scholars. and challenge or supplement the dominant views with Still, as Frank Sysyn rightly points out in his short neglected facts and alternative interpretations.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Distance Nationalism: Ukrainian Monuments and Historical Memory in Multicultural Canada
    CHAPTER 4 Long-Distance Nationalism: Ukrainian Monuments and Historical Memory in Multicultural Canada Per A. Rudling INTRODUCTION In October 2017, a political controversy erupted, as the Russian embassy in Ottawa posted a number of images on its twitter account, purporting to depict ‘Nazi memorials’ in Canada. Three images of memorials to Waffen-SS veterans, a prominent Nazi collaborator, and ultranationalist insurgents were accompanied by the comment ‘There are monuments to Nazi collaborators in Canada and nobody is doing anything about it’. The message was followed by the hash tags ‘#NeverForget #Holocaust #WorldWar2’ (‘Russia in Canada’ 2017) (Fig. 4.1). Three years earlier, Russia had invaded Ukraine and annexed parts of its territory, an action not seen in Europe since World War II. The invasion led to a sharp dete- rioration of Russia’s relations to the West, including Canada, the govern- ments of which strongly and publicly denounced the aggression. The diplomatic row of 2017 should be seen in the context of this conflict. P. A. Rudling (*) Lund University, Lund, Sweden e-mail: [email protected] © The Author(s) 2020 95 S. Marschall (ed.), Public Memory in the Context of Transnational Migration and Displacement, Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41329-3_4 96 P. A. RUDLING Fig. 4.1 Tweet by Russian Embassy in Ottawa (15 October 2017). Thanks to Vasily Kultyshev of the Russian Embassy in Ottawa for the permission to repro- duce. For copyright issues, the images of the Edmonton Shukhevych memo- rial along with the Oakville monuments to the UPA and veterans of the Waffen-SS Galizien have been removed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists and the Ukrainian Insurgent Army: Unwelcome Elements of an Identity Project
    Ab Imperio, 4/2010 John-Paul HIMKA THE ORGANIZATION OF UKRAINIAN NATIONALISTS AND THE UKRAINIAN INSURGENT ARMY: UNWELCOME ELEMENTS OF AN IDENTITY PROJECT Introduction What follows below are four polemical texts that aim to repudiate the legacy of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) and of its armed force, the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA). They were motivated by the, unfortunately largely successful, campaign of former president Viktor Yushchenko in Ukraine and the Ukrainian Canadian Congress (UCC) in the North American diaspora to put the glorification of these radical right nationalists at the very center of the Ukrainian national identity project.1 1 On the most recent Remembrance Day in Canada (November 11, 2010), the UCC issued a statement containing this passage: “As Ukrainian Canadians we also remember and pay tribute to the millions of men and women who perished fighting for the freedom of their ancestral Ukrainian homeland. The men and women of the Ukrainian Sich Riflemen, the 1st Ukrainian Division of the Ukrainian National Army, the Ukrainian Insurgent Army and the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists.” The Ukrainian Sich Riflemen fought for an independent Ukraine after World War I, and the 1st Ukrainian Division was a Waffen-SS unit in World War II. 83 John-Paul Himka, Unwelcome Elements of an Identity Project It is my conviction that building an identity around these organizations, with their heavy history of war crimes and ethnic cleansing, is misguided, and in the texts below I attempt to explain why. The first two texts engaged with a colleague of mine at the University of Alberta, Zenon Kohut, director of the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies and a prominent historian of Ukraine in the seventeenth and eigh- teenth centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Memory of Stalinist Purges in Modern Ukraine
    The Gordian Knot of Past and Present: Memory of Stalinist Purges in Modern Ukraine HALYNA MOKRUSHYNA Thesis submitted to the University of Ottawa in partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the PdD in Sociology School of Sociological and Anthropological Studies Faculty of Social Sciences University of Ottawa © Halyna Mokrushyna, Ottawa, Canada, 2018 ii Table of Contents Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... iv Preface ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: Methodology ....................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Research question ............................................................................................................................................................................ 10 Conceptual framework ................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Chapter 2: Social memory framework .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Plast's Centennial Celebrations Culminate with Jamboree in Lviv
    INSIDE: l Experts in Ukraine comment on independence – page 3 l Our communities mark Ukrainian Independence Day – page 4 l Ukraine a force at Summer Paralympic Games – page 14 THEPublished U by theKRAINIAN Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal W non-profit associationEEKLY Vol. LXXX No. 36 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 2012 $1/$2 in Ukraine Plast’s centennial celebrations Consecration of Bishop Borys Gudziak culminate with jamboree in Lviv draws thousands from Ukraine and beyond by Zenon Zawada Special to The Ukrainian Weekly LVIV – Rarely does the consecration of a bishop draw much attention beyond the clergy and staunch faithful, much less from youth. Yet state officials, diplomats and thou- sands of Catholics from Ukraine and abroad – including hundreds of Ukrainian Catholic University (UCU) students and graduates – packed St. George Cathedral in Lviv on August 26 to witness the consecra- tion of the Rev. Borys Gudziak as the 49th bishop of the Ukrainian Catholic Church. He will serve as apostolic exarch for Ukrainian Catholics of France, Switzerland, Belgium, Holland and Luxembourg. The cathedral’s tightly packed crowd – in which it was difficult for even politicians to get up front – reflected the profound effect that Bishop Borys, who turns 52 in November, has had on Ukrainian higher education during his 10-year tenure as UCU rector. During that decade, more than 2,500 students graduated, a 42-acre theo- logical seminary was built and construc- Zenon Zawada tion was launched on a 10-acre central campus where students now live. Bishop Borys Gudziak blesses the faithful with holy water following his August 26 con- “I came to thank God that my children secration at St.
    [Show full text]
  • Polish-Ukrainian Conflict Over Eastern Galicia | International Encyclopedia
    Version 1.0 | Last updated 08 October 2014 Polish-Ukrainian Conflict over Eastern Galicia By Oksana Dudko The Polish-Ukrainian conflict over Eastern Galicia in 1918-19 refers to an armed conflict between Poland and the West Ukrainian National Republic (Zakhidnoukrayins’ka Narodna Respublika, ZUNR). It took place largely on the territory of Eastern Galicia between 1 November 1918 and 17 July 1919. Table of Contents 1 Grounds for Conflict and Combatants’ Positions 2 Street Fighting in Lemberg 3 Battles in Eastern Galicia 4 Short- and Long-Term Consequences of the Conflict 5 A War of Memories Selected Bibliography Citation Grounds for Conflict and Combatants’ Positions The eastern portion of Galicia – the largest province within the Austro-Hungarian Empire – served as the principal setting for the conflict. In the countryside, ethnic Ukrainians were in the majority, whereas in Lemberg (Lviv/Lwów) and the surrounding towns they formed the minority. Before the war, ethnic Poles were the largest ethnic group in Lemberg proper; Jews comprised the second largest group, totaling more than 30 percent of city residents. Ukrainians formed the third largest group with 18 percent. With the collapse of the Austro-Hungarian monarchy on 16 October 1918, Charles I, Emperor of Austria (1887-1922) issued a proclamation granting autonomy to nations within the Empire. Both Poles and Ukrainians accordingly began to formulate plans to take control of Eastern Galicia, with the objective of establishing national rule. On 19 October 1918, the Ukrainian side formed a Ukrainian National Rada (Council) which announced its intention to establish an independent state on the territory of Eastern Galicia extending to the San River.
    [Show full text]
  • Nataliia Vovk UKRAINIAN GALICIAN ARMY MILITARY SYMBOLS and UNIFORM: SELECTED ISSUES Lviv Polytechnic National University
    Секція - Історія Nataliia Vovk UKRAINIAN GALICIAN ARMY MILITARY SYMBOLS AND UNIFORM: SELECTED ISSUES Lviv Polytechnic National University Introduction It is believed that uniforms and military distinctions in the armed forces discipline the personnel, significantly increase its morale and fighting spirit, enhance national consciousness, ensure the continuity of generations, give civilian and dignity of the warrior. The military of the Western Ukrainian People's Republic (WUPR), which was formed in the face of difficult conditions, during the active fighting in November 1918 was not an exception. The formation of a capable Ukrainian Galician Army (UGA) was closely linked not only to the organization of its combat units, quartermaster services, but also to the information system for providing troops. Against the background of a deep study of the important aspects of the WUPR armed forces construction, the problem of UGA information support during the Ukrainian- Polish confrontation should also be considered from the point of view of the analysis of the soldiers unity and legal documents that regulated the status of the UGA military form. The purpose of the study is to create an image of soldiers of the Ukrainian Galician Army. To achieve this goal, it is necessary to perform the following tasks: to analyze the historiographical and source base; identify the main elements of the analysis of the appearance of UGA soldiers; to analyze the main breastplates and orders of WUPR troops; to create an image of WUPR soldiers in the historiographic section. Analysis of historiographical sources reveals some gaps in the study of this problem. Among the researchers who partially analyzed the uniaxial UGA, we should mention M.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Ukrainian Special Collections at Harvard University
    A guide to Ukrainian special collections at Harvard University The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Kiebuzinski, Ksenya. 2007. A guide to Ukrainian special collections at Harvard University. Harvard Library Bulletin 18 (3-4). 1-107. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:42672684 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Ukrainian Research Institute Manuscripts and Archives he chronological extent of the Institute’s manuscript and archival collections ranges from 1860 to the present. Te collections include personal Tdocuments, correspondence, telegrams, minutes, fnancial and administrative records, manuscripts, publications, press clippings, and photographs. Te predominant languages of the various documents are Ukrainian and English, although some of the documents are written in other European languages. Te collections are a particularly important historical resource for the study of Ukraine during the revolutionary years 1917 to 1921 and Ukrainian refugee and émigré life in Europe and the United States following World War II. Te papers and archives are also useful for studying Ukrainian cultural life from the viewpoint of individual lives and institutional activities. Several collections provide insights into the immediate post-World War I period in Ukraine. Te Yaroslav Chyz collection includes telegrams relating to the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II in early 1917 and the ensuing hostilities that enveloped Eastern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • CIUS Dornik PB.Indd
    THE EMERGENCE SELF-DETERMINATION, OCCUPATION, AND WAR IN UKRAINE, 1917-1922 AND WAR OCCUPATION, SELF-DETERMINATION, THE EMERGENCE OF UKRAINE SELF-DETERMINATION, OCCUPATION, AND WAR IN UKRAINE, 1917-1922 The Emergence of Ukraine: Self-Determination, Occupation, and War in Ukraine, 1917–1922, is a collection of articles by several prominent historians from Austria, Germany, Poland, Ukraine, and Russia who undertook a detailed study of the formation of the independent Ukrainian state in 1918 and, in particular, of the occupation of Ukraine by the Central Powers in the fi nal year of the First World War. A slightly condensed version of the German- language Die Ukraine zwischen Selbstbestimmung und Fremdherrschaft 1917– 1922 (Graz, 2011), this book provides, on the one hand, a systematic outline of events in Ukraine during one of the most complex periods of twentieth- century European history, when the Austro-Hungarian and Russian empires collapsed at the end of the Great War and new independent nation-states OF emerged in Central and Eastern Europe. On the other hand, several chapters of this book provide detailed studies of specifi c aspects of the occupation of Ukraine by German and Austro-Hungarian troops following the Treaty of UKRAINE Brest-Litovsk, signed on 9 February 1918 between the Central Powers and the Ukrainian People’s Republic. For the fi rst time, these chapters o er English- speaking readers a wealth of hitherto unknown historical information based on thorough research and evaluation of documents from military archives in Vienna,
    [Show full text]
  • Huseyin Oylupinar
    Remaking Terra Cosacorum: Kozak Revival and Kozak Collective Identity in Independent Ukraine by Huseyin Oylupinar A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Modern Languages and Cultural Studies and Department of History and Classics University of Alberta © Huseyin Oylupinar, 2014 ABSTRACT This dissertation was undertaken to test the premise whether the modern Kozak revival was or could be used as a platform by the Ukrainian national cultural establishment for renegotiation, reformation, and consolidation of national identity in post-Soviet Ukraine. Its primary aim was to observe the relevance and function of deeds, images, traditions, memories and spaces—that is, the symbolic sources of the Kozak forefathers in addressing the problems of national consolidation in the present time. Secondarily, it was to explore the tools used in communication, propagation and negotiation of Kozak identity in Ukraine today. To observe the functions of Kozak symbolic sources, the dissertation traces them from the late 17th century to the fall of the Soviet Union. To investigate the tools used for communicating, propagating and negotiating Kozak identity the dissertation examines modern-day Kozak communities, and Kozak physical and cultural spaces. Working on the presumptions —that post-Soviet Ukraine would require national consolidation, —that bridging the Kozak past into the present would constitute an essential process of national consolidation, and —that via Kozak symbolic sources nationally oriented Ukrainians would efficiently rediscover, reinterpret and regenerate the Kozak identity, an examination of the primary and secondary sources, and the original oral narratives gathered in the course of on-site fieldwork demonstrated ii convincingly that the Kozak revival has been an active and effective tool of the Ukrainian national establishment in negotiating and propagating national identity in independent Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Рецензії / Reviews Udc 94(477.8)(092):329.17 Doi
    Ukrainian integral nationalism: social and personal dimensions РЕЦЕНЗІЇ / REVIEWS UDC 94(477.8)(092):329.17 DOI 10.24919/2519-058x.0.184419 Orest KRASIVSKYI PhD hab. (History), Professor, Head of the European Integration and Law Department of Lviv Regional Institute of Public Administration of the National Academy of Public Administration under Presidential authority, 16 V. Suhomlinskyi street, Bryukhovychi, Lviv region, Ukraine, postal code 79491 ([email protected]) Mykola LYTVYN PhD hab. (History), Professor, Head of the Center for the Study of Ukrainian-Polish Relations, I. Krypiakevych Institute of Ukrainian Studies, NAS of Ukraine, 4 Kozelnytska street, Lviv, Ukraine, postal code 79026 ([email protected]) ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1010-2329 ResearcherID: C-1385-2019 (http://www.researcherid.com/rid/C-1385-2019) Орест КРАСІВСЬКИЙ доктор історичних наук, професор, завідувач кафедри європейської інтеграції та права Львівського регіонального інституту державного управління Національної академії державного управління при Президентові України, вул. В. Сухомлинського, 16, Брюховичі, Львівська область, індекс 79491 ([email protected]) Микола ЛИТВИН, доктор історичних наук, професор, завідувач Центру дослідження українсько- польських відносин Інституту українознавства ім. І. Крип’якевича НАН України, вул. Козельницька, 4, Львів, Україна, індекс 79026 ([email protected]) UKRAINIAN INTEGRAL NATIONALISM: SOCIAL AND PERSONAL DIMENSIONS Review: Roman Shukhevych in the Social and Political Life of the Western Ukraine in 1920 – 1939: Memories, Documents, Pictures / Arr. and resp. ed. by Andriy Sova; Independent Historical Studies Center. Lviv: Apriori, 2019. 816 pp.; Posivnych Mykola. Stepan Bandera. Stryi: Shchedryk, 2017. 332 p. УКРАЇНСЬКИЙ ІНТЕГРАЛЬНИЙ НАЦІОНАЛІЗМ: СУСПІЛЬНИЙ ТА ОСОБИСТІСНИЙ ВИМІРИ Рецензія: Роман Шухевич у громадсько- політичному житті Західної України 1920 – 1939 рр.: спогади, документи, світлини / упор.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukrainian Revolution of 1914–1921: the European and Russian Dimension
    SENSUS HISTORIAE ISSN 2082–0860 Vol. XVI (2014/3) s. 237-261 Gennadii Korolov Institute of Ukrainian History, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Ukrainian Revolution of 1914–1921: The European and Russian Dimension Наша українська революція, на жаль, не розвивалась самостійно, вона ввесь час мусила маршувати з конвуль- сійними рухами і киданнями революції російської, хаотичної і страшної. Російська революція потягнула нас через кров, через руїну, через огонь. Mykhailo Hrushevsky (In the storm and fire, 1917) The Ukrainian revolution was a national or nationalist revolution whose goal was to win independence for a nation lacking it. Roman Szporluk (Review, 1978–1980) Historiographical and methodological notes n 1980, the American historian of Ukrainian origin, Roman Szporluk, Ipublished a review on a collection of articles “The Ukraine, 1917–1921: A Study in Revolution” (Cambridge, 1977), edited by Taras Hunczak, abruptly calling it “did not study the revolution.”1 The reviewer presented arguments against the prevailing interpretations of the revolutionary events in Ukraine. The historian showed the presence of the ideological subtext in the Diaspora concept of the “liberation movement in the 1917–1923,” pointing out methodological similarities with the Soviet paradigm of the “October Revolution and the Civil War in Ukraine of 1917–1920.” As a reference point, Szporluk chose 1914, the beginning of the First World War in Europe.2 For many historians, this year indicates the 1 R. Szporluk, The Annals of the Ukrainian Academy of Arts and Sciences in the United States. 1978–1980, “Review”, Vol. XIV, no. 37-38, pp. 267-271. 2 In modern Ukrainian historiography R.
    [Show full text]