DOCSLIB.ORG

Acts of Parliament That Have Led to Change

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Acts of Parliament That Have Led to Change www.parliament.uk/get-involved Acts of Parliament that have led to change 1601 Poor Relief Act After many monasteries were closed by Henry VIII, Parliament introduced the Poor Relief Act in 1601 to support people who could not work. Later, the Poor Law Amendment Act 1834 encouraged the building of workhouses to try to address the problems caused by the industrial revolution. Old age pensions were introduced in 1905 and state-provided welfare expanded in the decades that followed. In 1942, the Beveridge report argued that the poor laws and other provision should be replaced with a comprehensive welfare state. Those changes, including the foundation of the NHS, were introduced by Parliament following the Second World War. Campaigns to reform the welfare and health and social care system continue. 1807 Abolition of the Slave Trade Act In the 18th century, a brutal trade network transported kidnapped Africans to European colonies in the Americas and Caribbean to work as slaves. In 1787, campaigners, including former slaves, boycotted slave- produced goods and petitioned Parliament. In Parliament, William Wilberforce led the campaign to abolish the trade. Eventually, the massive national campaign inside and outside Parliament led to Parliament banning the slave trade in the British Empire in 1807, with slaves finally being freed – with compensation for the slave owners, but not the slaves - in 1838. The 2015 Modern Slavery Act tries to ensure that our slavery laws are up to date and protect people from being exploited. 1833 Factory Act In the early years of the industrial revolution, thousands of children worked long hours in factories and mills in often dangerous conditions. Campaigns such as the ten-hour movement called for reform, but child labour laws were not enforced. That changed following the 1933 Factory Act which introduced inspectors to prevent the employment of children under nine years old and ensured the provision of some education. Workers groups and others campaigned inside and outside Parliament to extend laws about safety and working hours to adults in factories and mines. Workplaces that used to be very dangerous places, gradually became safer for employees. Employment and health and safety laws are still regularly changed to take account of new ways of working. www.parliament.uk/get-involved 1965 Race Relations Act In the 1950s, racial tensions surrounding the arrival of Commonwealth immigrants to the UK led to calls for legislation to protect their rights. Campaigns, such as the Bristol bus boycott, organised by Guy Bailey after he was refused a job interview because he was black, and MPs raising the experiences of their constituents in the House of Commons added to the pressure on Parliament to pass the Race Relations Act 1965. The law was extended in 1968 to criminalise discrimination in housing, training and education and in the provision of goods and services. By the 2010 Equality Act, the focus had moved to a duty to promote equality, as well as prosecute and prevent discrimination. 1967 Sexual Offences Act In 1957, the Government were shocked when the Wolfenden report recommended that homosexual relationships be decriminalised. After a campaign in Parliament, homosexuality was legalised in England and Wales in 1967 for men over 21 (the laws had not applied to women), but it remained illegal in Scotland and Northern Ireland until the 1980s. Over the next few decades, the UK Parliament changed more and more laws that had discriminated against gay people and introduced measures to ensure equal rights. Gay marriage became legal in most of the UK in 2014. Different rules in Northern Ireland mean that same-sex marriages are recognised as civil partnerships, but not marriage. 1995 Disability Discrimination Act For centuries, the state provided workhouses or asylums for disabled people. Disabled people formed campaign groups to fight for their rights, including better access to services and an end to employment discrimination. In 1970, Parliament passed the Chronically Sick and Disabled Persons Act, which legislated for equal access to recreation and education facilities and said that local authorities had to provide care for people in their own homes, but it did not cover discrimination. It took a long campaign inside and outside Parliament before the first Disability Discrimination Act was passed in 1995, but many felt that it did not go far enough. It was strengthened in 2005 and replaced with the Equality Act in 2010. Disabled campaigners continue to push for equality and fair access. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Comparative Study of Anti-Discrimination Laws of the UK, the United States of America and India
    ISSN 2039-2117 (online) Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol 7 No 3 S2 ISSN 2039-9340 (print) MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy May 2016 Comparative Study of Anti-Discrimination Laws of the UK, the United States of America and India Amir Hossein Amirkahni Associate Professor in Payame Nour University, Tehran Reza Heydari Sheikh Tabghi MA Student, Public Administration, Payame Nour, Western Tehran Doi:10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n3s2p96 Abstract The issue of legal prohibition of discrimination is important because «high and positive correlation exists between the sense of political equality and belief in legitimacy of govenrment. This relationship guarantees the meaning that acceptance and confirming the legitimacy of the government realizes when the state and its Statesmen respect the principles of equality »(Yousefi, 2004). Additionally, battle against discrimination in society leads to increased participation of social groups in managing social affairs and this by itself leads to increased national cohesion and progress in the country. This paper compares the laws against discrimination in the countries of India, The Unites States of America and The United Kingdom with regards to historical and social background, sources of anti-discrimination laws, how to identify the grounds of discrimination, multiple discriminations, coverage and how to apply affirmative action. Keywords: Discrimination, Equality, Law, United Kingdom, United States of America, India 1. Introduction Discrimination means different behavior with individuals because of what they are or believe in. Discrimination aims at the heart of humanity. We all have the right to be treated equally, regardless of our race, ethnicity, nationality, class, caste, religion, belief, sex, language, sexual orientation, gender identity, age, health or other status.
    [Show full text]
  • Runnymede Trust Conference: What Magna Carta and the Race
    RUNNYMEDE TRUST CONFERENCE WHAT MAGNA CARTA AND THE RACE RELATIONS ACT MEAN TO US TODAY SIR RABINDER SINGH 29 JULY 2015 1. I am honoured to have been invited to address you today. The Runnymede Trust is the leading organisation in this country dedicated to the promotion of racial equality. When it was founded in 1968 by Jim Rose and Anthony Lester it took its name from the meadow by the Thames where the first Magna Carta was sealed in 1215. I am particularly pleased that, among the understandable and widespread commemorations of the 800th anniversary of Magna Carta, the opportunity has not been lost also to remember that this is the 50th Anniversary of the first Race Relations Act in this country. 2. At first sight it is not obvious that there is any link between the two. It is well- known that Magna Carta was sealed as part of a power struggle between King John and the Barons. They would hardly have been interested in creating an equal society. Furthermore, many of the references in Magna Carta itself are based on distinctions between people depending on their status: the reference to “all free men” clearly excluded those who were villeins. The institution of 1 serfdom was very much alive at that time. And there were provisions in the 1215 version of Magna Carta which on their face discriminated against Jews. 3. Lord Sumption, who is not only a Justice of the Supreme Court but a distinguished historian, has described the sentiments which often surround Magna Carta as “high minded tosh.”1 Although it is undoubtedly correct to question whether many of the modern readings of Magna Carta have any basis in historical fact, it is also important to recall that the mythology surrounding such documents can itself have continuing impact on a society.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamental Rights in the United Kingdom: the Law and the British Constitution*
    FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM: THE LAW AND THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION* ANTHONY LESTERt I. INTRODUCTION I am honoured to have been invited to give this lecture and more grateful than words can express. It is a daunting invitation, especially when one recalls the demanding standards of the Owen J. Roberts Memorial Lectureship and the distinguished character of my predecessors. And it is a particular privilege for an Englishman-who is not a judge, a statesman, or a professor, but a practitioner at the English Bar-to have been asked to lecture in this historic birthplace of the Declaration of Indepen- dence during the year of the Bicentennial celebrations. I believe that Mr. Justice Roberts would have been in- terested by my theme. In his judicial capacity, he was a member of a divided Court that was called upon to reconcile the constitu- tional guarantees of personal liberty both with the proper alloca- tion of power between the federal government and the states of the Union, and with the imperatives of a great modern industrial nation. His judicial experience would surely have made him in- terested in the way in which we, in the United Kingdom, have wrestled with analogous constitutional and legal problems, with- out a written constitution or a binding Bill of Rights. And his work for international federation and Atlantic union, after his retirement from the Supreme Court, indicates that he would have been fascinated by the constitutional and legal conse- quences of the creation of a European Community, inspired by the making of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights in the UK UN Protection of Rights
    Historical protection of rights Magna Carta 1215 – restricted the King’s The Putney Debates 1647 – discussed powers, supported habeas corpus, and universal male suffrage and rights for introduced petitioning the poor SAMPLE Habeas Corpus Act 1679 – strengthened the English Bill of Rights 1689 – prohibited right to a fair trial cruel and unusual punishment, and provided a foundation for the rule of law Human Rights in the UK UN protection of rights Universal Declaration of Human Rights International Convention on Elimination 1948 – adopted by the UN following the of all forms of Racial Discrimination 1965 – atrocities of WW2 the first UN human rights treaty, ratified by the UK in 1969 SAMPLE UN Convention on the Rights of the Child Universal Periodic Review 2006 – all UN 1989 – children need special protection member states will have their human rights of their rights records scrutinised Human Rights in the UK UK human rights laws Race Relations Act 1965 – laid the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 – banned foundations for future, more effective discrimination against women in employment, legislation in the Race Relations Act 1976 education and provision of goods and services SAMPLE Disability Discrimination Act 1995 – covered Equality Act 2010 – combined 110 pieces of discrimination in employment, education, rights legislation into one Act transport, and premises Human Rights in the UK Human Rights Act 1998 Enshrined the European Convention on All UK laws – old and new – must be Human Rights into UK law ‘compatible’ with the HRA SAMPLE All public
    [Show full text]
  • Protection of Immigrant and Racial Minorities: a Survey of British Legal History
    William & Mary Law Review Volume 13 (1971-1972) Issue 2 Article 5 December 1971 Protection of Immigrant and Racial Minorities: A Survey of British Legal History Richard Plender Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons Repository Citation Richard Plender, Protection of Immigrant and Racial Minorities: A Survey of British Legal History, 13 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 338 (1971), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol13/iss2/5 Copyright c 1971 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr PROTECTION OF IMMIGRANT AND RACIAL MINORITIES: A SURVEY IN BRITISH LEGAL HISTORY RICHARD PLENDER* The American lawyer, aware of the great volume of state and federal. legislation which governs racial discrimnmation in the United States and, aware of the growth of racial friction in Britain during the last two decades, is apt to be surprised by the relative paucity of anti-discrimia- tory legislation in the United Kingdom. The main corpus of British law on racial discrimination is now contained in the Race Relations Act 1968 and the few remaining sections of the Race Relations Act 1965. The scarcity of anti-discrimiatory legislation in Britain is popularly attrib- uted to the novelty of racial discrimination in that country I In the same way, the supposed novelty of Britain's so-called race problem is often thought to explain the great interest in the subject shown by members of the academic community in the last 20 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Race Relations Act 1976
    Race Relations Act 1976 CHAPTER 74 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I DISCRIMINATION TO WHICH ACT APPLIES Section 1. Racial discrimination. 2. Discrimination by way of victimisation. 3. Meaning of " racial grounds ", " racial group " etc. PART II DISCRIMINATION IN THE EMPLOYMENT FIELD Discrimination by employers 4. Discrimination against applicants and employees. 5. Exceptions for genuine occupational qualifications. 6. Exception for employment intended to provide training in skills to be exercised outside Great Britain. 7. Discrimination against contract workers. 8. Meaning of employment at establishment in Great Britain. 9. Exception for seamen recruited abroad. Discrimination by other bodies 10. Partnerships. 11. Trade unions etc. 12. Qualifying bodies. 13. Vocational training bodies. 14. Employment agencies. 15. Manpower Services Commission etc. Police 16. Police. 1976 ii c. 74 Race Relations Act PART III DISCRIMINATION IN OTHER FIELDS Education Section 17. Discrimination by bodies in charge of educational establish- ments. 18. Other discrimination by local education authorities. 19. General duty in public sector of education. Goods, facilities, services and premises 20. Discrimination in provision of goods, facilities or services. 21. Discrimination in disposal or management of premises. 22. Exception from ss. 20(1) and 21: small dwellings. 23. Further exceptions from ss. 20(1) and 21. 24. Discrimination: consent for assignment or sub-letting. 25. Discrimination: associations not within s. 11. 26. Exception from s. 25 for certain associations. Extent 27. Extent of Part III. PART IV OTHER UNLAWFUL ACTS 28. Discriminatory practices. 29. Discriminatory advertisements. 30. Instructions to discriminate. 31. Pressure to discriminate. 32. Liability of employers and principals. 33. Aiding unlawful acts. PART V CHARITIES 34.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from the 1965 Race Relations Act
    Runnymede Perspectives How Far Have We Come? Lessons from the 1965 Race Relations Act Edited by Omar Khan Runnymede: Intelligence Disclaimer This publication is part of the Runnymede Perspectives for a Multi-ethnic Britain series, the aim of which is to foment free and exploratory thinking on race, ethnicity and equality. The facts presented and views expressed in this publication are, however, those Runnymede is the UK’s of the individual authors and not necessariliy those of the Runnymede Trust. leading independent thinktank on race equality and race Acknowledgements relations. Through high- We are grateful to all of the contributors and participants quality research and thought who attended the day-long conference on 29 July on leadership, we: which this collection is based and those who have written specifically for this publication. We are grateful to the Arts and Humanities Council (AHRC) for their support of this • Identify barriers to race event, publication and the Runnymede Academic Forum (AH/K007564/1). equality and good race relations; We are also grateful to the University of Kent for additional • Provide evidence to support for the conference. support action for social change; ISBN: 978-1-909546-13-4 • Influence policy at all Published by Runnymede in December 2015, this document is levels. copyright © Runnymede 2015. Some rights reserved. Open access. Some rights reserved. The Runnymede Trust wants to encourage the circulation of its work as widely as possible while retaining the copyright. The trust has an open access policy which enables anyone to access its content online without charge. Anyone can download, save, perform or distribute this work in any format, including translation, without written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • British Anti-Discrimination Law: an Introduction Christopher Mccrudden
    Penn State International Law Review Volume 2 Article 3 Number 1 Dickinson International Law Annual 1983 British Anti-Discrimination Law: An Introduction Christopher McCrudden Follow this and additional works at: http://elibrary.law.psu.edu/psilr Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation McCrudden, Christopher (1983) "British Anti-Discrimination Law: An Introduction," Penn State International Law Review: Vol. 2: No. 1, Article 3. Available at: http://elibrary.law.psu.edu/psilr/vol2/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Penn State Law eLibrary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Penn State International Law Review by an authorized administrator of Penn State Law eLibrary. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BRITISH ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAW: AN INTRODUCTION ** Christopher McCrudden I. INTRODUCTION The United Kingdom is a signatory of a number of inter- national treaties protecting various aspects of human rights, including freedom from discrimination. Yet, there is no legislation in this country protecting a comprehen- sive list of human rights in the manner of the United States Bill of Rights, although there have been a number of unsuccessful attempts to enact such legislation since 1969. Moreover, prior to the race relations legislation there was no general rule, policy or principle in common law directly relevant to combating racial discrimination or incitement to racial hatred. In specific situations, however, as a by-product of the regulation of other areas, the common law and various statutes (e.g. the Public Order Act 1936)1 did--and do-- make unlawful certain conduct and the use of speech which might incite racial hatred.
    [Show full text]
  • Encyclopedia of Contemporary British Culture
    ENCYCLOPEDIA OF CONTEMPORARY BRITISH CULTURE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF CONTEMPORARY BRITISH CULTURE Edited by Peter Childs and Mike Storry London and New York First published 1999 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor and Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2002. © 1999 Routledge All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Encyclopedia of contemporary British culture/edited by Peter Childs and Mike Storry. p. cm. Includes bibliographical information and index. 1. Great Britain—Civilization—20th century—Encyclopedias. 2. Great Britain—History—Elizabeth II, 1952– —Encyclopedias. I. Childs, Peter, 1962– . II. Storry, Mike, 1943– . DA589.4.E53 1999 98–32205 306’.0941’0904–dc21 CIP ISBN 0-415-14726-3 (Print Edition) ISBN 0-203-02795-7 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-203-39998-6 (Glassbook Format) TO JO CROFT Contents Editorial team viii Entries A-Z 1 List of contributors ix Introduction xiii Index 577 Acknowledgements xv How to use this
    [Show full text]
  • Cooper M Final Phd 071013.Pdf
    The Labour Governments 1964-1970 and the Other Equalities. Matthew Richard Cooper School of History, Queen Mary University of London. Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. i The Labour Governments 1964-1970 and the Other Equalities. Matthew Cooper 2013 ii Abstract This thesis explores the idea that an equality state has evolved in Britain since the 1960s. The policies and institutions that make up the equality state are those that seek to ensure some forms of equality between its citizens. Its latest development has been through the 2010 Equality Act that promotes equality in relation to nine protected characteristics, but just two of these are considered here, race and sex. The study will investigate the origins of the equality state under the 1964-1970 Labour governments through the formulation of policies that explicitly or implicitly promoted sex and racial equality. The main areas examined in relation to racial equality are the anti- discrimination provisions of the 1965 and 1968 Race Relations Acts; measures to promote the integration of immigrants, particularly in employment, education, housing and policing; the institutions which aided integration particularly the National Committee for Commonwealth Immigrants and Community Relations Commission; and the Urban Programme and other measures taken in response to Enoch Powell's 1968 'Rivers of Blood' speech. With sex equality the areas considered are the 1970 Equal Pay Act; the development of policy to promote equal opportunity in employment; and the reform of law relating to abortion, divorce and the availability of contraceptive services through state agencies. iii The primary focus of the thesis is on the policy making process and the research is based on government papers in The National Archives.
    [Show full text]
  • Race Relations Act 1968 CHAPTER 71
    Race Relations Act 1968 CHAPTER 71 LONDON HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE Race Relations Act 1968 CHAPTER 71 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I DIscRIWNATI0N General Section 1. Meaning of" discriminate ". Unlawful discrimination 2. Provision of goods, facilities and services. 3. Employment. 4. Trade unions, and employers' and trade organisations. 5. Housing accommodation, and business and other pre- mises. 6. Advertisements and notices. Acts which are not unlawful 7. Exception in the case of residential accommodation. 8. Exceptions in the case of employment. 9. Charities and acts done for charitable purposes. 10. Acts done to safeguard national security. 11. Conduct relating to acts abroad. Supplemental 12. Incitement and accessories. 13. Liability of employers, principals and agents. PART II CONCILIATION AND ENFORCEMENT Consideration of complaints 14. The Race Relations Board and conciliation committees. 15. General provision as to investigation of complaints of discrimination. 16. Investigation of complaints relating to employment, trade unions and organisations of employers. 17. Investigation of unlawful conduct where no complaint made. 18. Assessors. A CH. 71 Race Relations Act 1968 Legal proceedings Section 19. Nature of proceedings in England and Wales. 20. Nature of proceedings in Scotland. 21. Injunctions and orders. 22. Damages. 23. Validity and revision of contracts. 24. Privileged communications. PART III MISCELLANEOUS AND GENERAL 25. The Community Relations Conmilssion. 26. Research. 27. Application to the Crown, the police and public bodies. 28. Supplementary. 29. Short title, citation, conunencement and extent. SCHEDULES: Schedule 1—Provisions as to the Race Relations Board and conciliation committees. Schedule 2—Complaints relating to employment, trade unions and organisations of employers.
    [Show full text]
  • Race Relations Act 1968: 50Th Anniversary
    Library Briefing Race Relations Act 1968: 50th Anniversary Summary On 25 October 1968 the Race Relations Act received royal assent. The Act sought to build on the Race Relations Act 1965, which at the time was widely regarded as providing insufficient protection from discrimination, by extending prohibition of racial discrimination in relation to housing, employment and public services, as well as strengthening the Race Relations Board. This briefing sets out the chronology of how the Race Relations Act 1968 came to be passed, referring for context to the passage through Parliament earlier that year of the Commonwealth Immigrants Act. Background Post-Empire Migration to Britain British nationality was originally based on birth in the land controlled by the monarch, wherever that was.1 Everyone was a British ‘subject’. Following changes brought in by the British Nationality Act 1948 (with some exceptions), people based in the UK or based in a British colony overseas would become citizens of the UK and Colonies (CUKCs). CUKCs were therefore people born, adopted, registered, or naturalized in the UK or the Colonies, or whose father was such a person and who therefore had a right to come to the United Kingdom.2 After the war, the need to rebuild Britain’s infrastructure invited substantial labour immigration, especially from the British Caribbean in the 1950s.3 During the 1960s, the reaction of the newly independent former colonies in East Africa to past white domination was policies of Africanisation: a process of giving preference to their
    [Show full text]