PACEEQ Participation Communautaire À L’Education De Base Pour L’Equité Et La Qualité

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PACEEQ Participation Communautaire À L’Education De Base Pour L’Equité Et La Qualité Community Participation for Equity & Quality in Basic Education in Guinea PACEEQ Participation Communautaire à l’Education de Base pour l’Equité et la Qualité FINAL REPORT Covering the period September 2001 – April 2007 Submitted to Dr. Maladho Baldé CTO USAID/Guinea World Education Guinea B.P. 111 Mamou USAID COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT N° 675-A-00-01-00163-00 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Acronyms 3 Introduction 4 The PACEEQ Approach 6 Analytical Summary 10 Intermediate Result 3: Improved Community Participation In Basic Education 20 Sub-IR 3.1. Increased participation, decision-making and mobilization and management of resources for primary schools 21 Sub-IR 3.2. Increased participation of CSOs and NGOs in Education 35 Sub-IR 3.3. Increased educational quality and greater equity for girls and rural children as a result of community participation 85 Intermediate Result 4: Improved Gender And Rural/Urban Equity In Basic Education 98 Sub-IR 4.1. Improved access to basic education for girls and rural children 99 Sub-IR 4.2. Increased promotion and retention rates for girls and rural children 105 Project Management 118 Administration and Finances 140 Monitoring & Evaluation 145 Annexes 151 2 PACEEQ Final Report 2001-2007 List of Acronyms ACRONYMS DEFINITION (ENGLISH-FRENCH) AED Academy for Educational Development AG (GA) General Assembly (Assemblée Générale) APEAE Parents’ Association (Association des Parents d’Elèves et Amis de l’Ecole) Board of Parents’ Association B/APEAE (Bureau d’Association des Parents d’Elèves et Amis de l’Ecole) Federated Parents’ Association C/APEAE (Coordination des Associations des Parents d’Elèves et Amis de l’Ecole) CBO Community Based Organization (Organisation Communautaire) Local Scholarship Management Committee (Comité de Gestion de Bourses à la CGBB Base) CSO Civil Society Organization (Organisation de la Société Civile) Rural Community Development Committee CRD (Communauté Rurale de Développement) CTP Prefectoral Technical Advisor (Conseiller Technique Préfectoral) CTR Regional Technical Advisor (Conseiller Technique Régional) Prefectoral Department of Education DPE (Direction Préfectorale de l’Education) Elementary Education Representative (Délégué Scolaire de l’Enseignement DSEE Elémentaire) EAP (PAE) Educational Action Plan (Plan d’Action de l’Education) EDC Educational Development Center ERO Bi-Annual Internal Evaluation (Evaluation Rapide Organisationnelle) FKL The regions of Faranah, Kankan, and Labé National Foundation for Girls’ Education FONSEF Fonds National de Soutien à l’Education des Filles INRAP Institut National de Recherche et d’Action Pédagogique ONG (NGO) Non-Governmental Organization (Organisation Non Gouvernementale) Community Participation for Equity & Quality in Basic Education in Guinea PACEEQ (Participation Communautaire à l’Education de Base pour l’Equité & la Qualité) PDL Local Development Plan for CRD (Plan de Développement Local des CRD) PS Planification Strategique (Strategic Planning) NGO Network for Education And Child Protection RONGEPE Réseau des ONG pour l’Education et le Protection des Enfants RTI Research Triangle Institute TOT (FdF) Training of Trainers (Formation de Formateurs) WEG World Education, Guinea 3 PACEEQ Final Report 2001-2007 Introduction World Education began working in community participation in education in Guinea with the 1997 Community Education pilot program in 1997 with funding from USAID. In 2001, Building on the experience from the pilot project, World Education launched the Community Participation for Equity and Quality in Basic Education in Guinea (Participation Communautaire à l’Education de Base pour l’Equité et la Qualité – PACEEQ) with funding from USAID. PACEEQ was a consortium managed by World Education, with Academy for Education Development (AED), Education Development Center (EDC), Research Triangle Institute (RTI) and Save the Children- US as consortium partners. PACEEQ worked with Parents’ Associations and other community based organizations by building their capacity to work in partnership with the school administration to improve the quality of education. In August 2005 USAID awarded an extension to PACEEQ for a consolidation phase. This Final Report covers all activities carried out during the PACEEQ from 2001 through 2007 funded by USAID Cooperative Agreement 675-A-00-01-00163-00. The report is organized by intermediate result and for each intermediate result there is a summary table showing the activities completed and results attained. PACEEQ supported two of USAID/Guinea’s Intermediate Results, specifically: 1) Improved community participation in basic education and 2) Improved gender and rural/urban equity in basic education. The strategic objectives of PACEEQ were to achieve: 1. A qualitative increase of community participation in improving primary education; 2. A heightened and more decisive involvement of Parent-Teacher Associations (APEAE) in decision making and resource management for schools; 3. An augmentation of school inscription and retention rates, along with heightened student performance, particularly among girls and students in rural zones; 4. An amelioration of the participation of the civil society and, in particular, of NGOs, in the process of improving the quality of the education system. Designed to capitalize on the success of the PACEEQ initiative from 2001-2005, the consolidation phase sought to: • Build on current activities and continue to achieve strong results; • Ensure the sustainability of project activities and approaches; • Gather, analyze and document the experiences of PACEEQ in order to share lessons learned with stakeholders and inform the development of future strategies in Guinea, particularly for the education sector. 4 PACEEQ Final Report 2001-2007 The strategic objectives for the PACEEQ consolidation phase were: 1) Continue the achievement of strong results in building community participation and improving gender and rural/urban equity in education; 2) Solidify the partnership between the formal education system and APEAE at the local level; 3) Reinforce the organizational capacity, representation and sustainability of federated APEAE structures at the sub-prefecture, prefecture, regional, and national levels; 4) Expand capacity-development activities for Local Alliances for Girls’ Education and the National Equity Committee in order to ensure their viability and partnership in advancing girls’ education in Guinea; 5) Create and implement strategies that will ensure the sustainability for project activities and approaches; and 6) Conduct studies and enrich project documentation in order to document and share information about lessons learned with relevant stakeholders. The concept of community participation in education entered the national debate in Guinea in 1985 as part of a larger movement for the development of civil society organizations in Guinea. The creation of Parents’ Associations was authorized by Ministerial decree in 1986. Progress in attaining meaningful community participation has been hindered by a number of obstacles, including the mindset inherited from the era when the government had sole responsibility for school affairs. Prior to 1986, schools had always been considered the domain of the government as opposed to the community. Although recent policies and decentralization plans are beginning to reverse the situation by giving greater responsibility to local communities for community development including education, the old mindset lingers. High illiteracy rates pose another obstacle to widespread and meaningful community participation in education. The literacy rate for the adult population in Guinea today is estimated only at 41%. This is even lower for women and rural areas. The high level of illiteracy reinforces the existing division between schools and communities. Illiterate parents feel disempowered next to the educated, salaried school officials, who did not always welcome their involvement. Another obstacle is the low organizational capacity of the Parents’ Associations themselves. Although Parents’ Associations have been in existence since 1985, until 1997 when World Education began working with Parents’ Associations, most existed in name only. Board members were not elected; they were appointed, often by the school administration. There was little documentation of the activities of Parents’ Associations, most were not legally registered, and they kept few, if any written records of the funds collected and how they were spent. There was virtually no accountability to members in terms of activity or financial reporting, and women’s participation overall was negligible. 5 PACEEQ Final Report 2001-2007 This is the context in which World Education began working with Parents’ Associations, first in 1997 with the Community Education project and later in 2001 with the PACEEQ consortium. Today, through the efforts of PACEEQ, many Parents’ Associations have become models of civic action for education, demonstrating that communities are capable of organizing and contributing to improvements in the quality of education. This renewal of Parents’ Associations came to be seen as a “social movement” which was sanctioned by the Ministry of Education. A landmark policy directive by the Ministry of Education in 2005 validated the efforts of Parents’ Associations and mandated their roles and responsibilities. Ministry of Education Circular No. 0999 In September 2005 the Ministry of Pre-University Education and Civic Education issued MEPU-EC Circular No. 0999. This
Recommended publications
  • Analysis of Capacity Development in Education Management Under the Education for All Programme in Guinea
    Analysis of Capacity Development in Education Management Under the Education for All Programme in Guinea A Dissertation Submitted to the University of Tsukuba In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Social Sciences Mamadou Saliou DIALLO 2019 ABSTRACT This thesis deals with the analysis of capacity development in education management under the Education for All Program in Guinea. The main purposes of this study are as follows: The first is to provide a general review of Guinea’s education reform processes and their relative outcomes. The second is to trace the pattern of sustainability of the reform framework put in place during EFA program intervention in order to strengthen Guinea’s education system of decentralized management capacity. The third is to provide better understanding and perhaps lessons from Guinea for reform perspectives in comparable countries and regions. Although, capacity development concept/definition appears to be accommodant, its central meaning within the realm of education planning and management refers to the improvement of the performance of the existing system in the educational service delivery in an efficient, equitable and sustainable way. Therefore, the research proceeds with an in-depth case study using political economy as an analytical approach to explore and depict the gradual unfolding and change brought by the reform intervention. With particular scrutiny on the overall structures of the education system, the content, context and the actions of the actors involved in the education reform process. Methodologically, a mixed approach of inquiry is being applied in order to achieve the goals of this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Multisectoral Strategies for Advancing Girls' Education: Principles and Practice
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 460 210 UD 034 660 AUTHOR Williams, Howard TITLE Multisectoral Strategies for Advancing Girls' Education: Principles and Practice. SAGE Technical Report. INSTITUTION Academy for Educational Development, Washington, DC. SPONS AGENCY Agency for International Development (Dept. of State), Washington, DC. REPORT NO SAGE-TR-3 PUB DATE 2001-06-00 NOTE 81p. CONTRACT FAO-Q-07-96-90006 AVAILABLE FROM Academy for Educational Development, Strategies for Advancing Girls' Education (SAGE) Project, 1825 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20009-5721. For full text: http://www.aed.org/publications/Williams.pdf. PUB TYPE Reports Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC04 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Developing Nations; Educational Improvement; Elementary Secondary Education; Equal Education; Federal Aid; *Females; Foreign Countries; Gender Issues; Government School Relationship; Nongovernmental Organizations; *Partnerships in Education; School Community Relationship; *Womens Education IDENTIFIERS Guatemala; *Guinea; Mali; *Morocco; Peru ABSTRACT This paper describes issues, experiences, and strategies used in developing successful multisectoral partnerships to advance girls' education, using Guinea and Morocco as examples. Chapter 1 introduces the issue, discussing barriers to girls' education and describing the multisectoral response to interrelated barriers. Chapter 2 defines the multisectoral approach and describes the conceptual approach being implemented in Guatemala, Peru, Morocco, Guinea, and Mali. Chapters 3 and 4 present case
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Report Government of Japan COUNTERING EPIDEMIC-PRONE
    Government of Japan COUNTERING EPIDEMIC-PRONE DISEASES ALONG BORDERS AND MIGRATION ROUTE IN GUINEA Interim Report Project Period: 30 March 2016 – 29 March 2017 Reporting Period: 30 March 2016-31 August 2016 Funds: 2.000.000 USD Executing Organization: International Organization for Migration (IOM) Guinea October 2016 Interim Report to Government of Japan COUNTERING EPIDEMIC-PRONE DISEASES ALONG BORDERS AND MIGRATION ROUTES IN GUINEA Project Data Table Executing Organization: International Organization for Migration (IOM) Project Identification and IOM Project Code: MP.0281 Contract Numbers: Contract number: NI/IOM/120 Project Management Site Management Site: Conakry, CO, GUINEA and Relevant Regional Regional Office: Dakar, RO, SENEGAL Office: Project Period: 30 March 2016 – 29 March 2017 Geographical Coverage: Guinea Communal / Sub Prefectural / Prefectural / Regional Health authorities and Project Beneficiaries: Community members in Guinea Ministry of Health, National Health Security Agency, US Agency for international development (USAID), U.S. Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance Project Partner(s): (OFDA), Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), World Health Organization (WHO), International Medical Corps (IMC), Research triangle institute (RTI), Premieres Urgences (PU) Reporting Period: 30 March 2016 – 31 August 2017 Date of Submission: 30 October 2016 Total Confirmed 2,000,000 USD Funding: Total Funds Received to 2,000,000 USD Date: Total Expenditures: 439,761 USD Headquarters 17 route des Morillons • C.P. 71 • CH-1211
    [Show full text]
  • Ecologically Sensitive Sites in Africa. Volume 1
    Ecologically Sites in Africa Volume I: Occidental and Central Africa Benin Cameroon Central African Republic Congo Cdte d'lvoire Eq uatorlil^lllpvea aSon Guinea Complled'by the World Conservation Monitoring Centre For TK^^o^d Bdnk Ecologically Sensitive Sites in Africa Volume I: Occidental and Central Africa WORLD CONSERVATION! MONITORING CENTRE 2 4 MAY 1995 Compiled by PROTECTED AREAS | World Conservation Monitoring Centre Cambridge, UK for The World Bank Washington DC, USA The World Bank 1993 Published by The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA. Prepared by the World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC), 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 ODL, UK. WCMC is a joint venture between the three partners who developed The World Conservation Strategy and its successor Caring for the Earth: lUCN-World Conservation Union, UNEP-United Nations Environment Programme, and WWF- World Wide Fund for Nature. Its mission is to provide an information, research and assessment service on the status, security and management of the Earth's biological diversity as the basis for its conservation and sustainable use. Copyright: 1993 The World Bank Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior permission from the copyright holder. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: World Bank (1993). Ecologically Sensitive Sites in Africa. Volume I: Occidental and Central Africa. Compiled by the World Conservation Monitoring Centre for The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA. Printed by: The Burlington Press, Cambridge, UK. Cover illustration: Nairobi City Skyline with Kongoni and Grant's Gazelles, RIM Campbell.
    [Show full text]
  • Livelihood Zone Descriptions: Guinea
    REVISION OF THE LIVELIHOODS ZONE MAP AND DESCRIPTIONS FOR THE REPUBLIC OF GUINEA A REPORT OF THE FAMINE EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS NETWROK (FEWS NET) November 2016 This report is based on the original livelihoods zoning report of 2013 and was produced by Julius Holt, Food Economy Group, consultant to FEWS NET GUINEA Livelihood Zone Map and Descriptions November 2016 2013 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Changes to the Livelihood Zones Map ...................................................................................................................... 5 The National Context ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Livelihood Zone Descriptions .................................................................................................................................. 10 ZONE GN01 LITTORAL: RICE, FISHING, PALM OIL .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 12086674.Pdf
    EN MOYENNE ET HAUTE GUINEE DURABLE LE DEVELOPPEMENT RURAL POUR L’ETUDE ET LA PLANIFICATION Bureau de Stratégie et Développement Ministère de l’Agriculture République de Guinée EN REPUBLIQUE DE GUINEE EN REPUBLIQUE L’ETUDE ET LA PLANIFICATION POUR LE DEVELOPPEMENT RURAL DURABLE EN MOYENNE ET HAUTE GUINEE Rapport final (Annexes) RAPPORT FINAL (Annexes) Janvier 2013 Janvier 2013 Agence Japonaise de Coopération Internationale NTC International Co., Ltd RD JR 13-008 Bureau de Stratégie et Développement Ministère de l’Agriculture République de Guinée L’ETUDE ET LA PLANIFICATION POUR LE DEVELOPPEMENT RURAL DURABLE EN MOYENNE ET HAUTE GUINEE Rapport final Annexe Janvier 2013 NTC International Co., Ltd L’Etude et la planification pour le développement rural durable en Moyenne et Haute Guinée GUINÉE SÉNÉGAL MALI GUINÉE‐BISSAU KOUNDÂRA LABÉ MOYENNE GUINÉE MALI BOKÉ GAOUAL KOUBIA SIGUIRI LÉLOUMA DINGUIRAYE TOUGUÉ LABÉ HAUTE GUINÉE KANKAN PITA DALABA GUINÉE MARITIME DABOLA KOUROUSSA MANDIANA MAMOU MAMOU KANKAN FARANAH KINDIA Conakry FARANAH (Capital) KEROUANÉ SIERRA LEONE NZÉRÉKORÉ 〈Légende 〉 GUINÉEFORESTIÉRE Frontière de la région Capital MOYENNE GUINÉE HAUTE GUINÉE LIBÉRIA CÔTE texte:Nom de préfecture qui est inclus D'IVOIRE dans la zone d'étude エラー! Guinée Plan d’emplacement des zones faisant l’objet de la présente étude Liste des abréviations ACA l'Agence pour la Commercialisation Agricole ACM Associations de Cautionnement Mutuel ANPROCA Agence National de Promotion Rural et Conseille Agricole A/P Activité Pilote ASF Association Service Financière
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Artisanal (Small-Scale) Fisheries Development Final Report
    No. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Ministry of Fisheries and Aquaculture, the Republic of Guinea STUDY ON ARTISANAL (SMALL-SCALE) FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT FINAL REPORT (MAIN REPORT) AUGUST, 2003 OVERSEAS AGRO-FISHERIES CONSULTANTS CO., LTD. IC NET LIMITED AFF JR 03-49 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Ministry of Fisheries and Aquaculture, the Republic of Guinea STUDY ON ARTISANAL (SMALL-SCALE) FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT FINAL REPORT (MAIN REPORT) AUGUST, 2003 OVERSEAS AGRO-FISHERIES CONSULTANTS CO., LTD. IC NET LIMITED PREFACE In response to a request from the Government of the Republic of Guinea, the Government of Japan decided to conduct a development study on artisanal fisheries development and entrusted the study to the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). In the 2-year period from March 2000 to June 2003, JICA sent to Guinea three times, a study team lead by Mr. Yasuo Ishimoto from Overseas Agro-Fisheries Consultants Co. Ltd.. The team held discussions with concerned officials from the Government of Guinea, and conducted a field study at the study area. After the team returned to Japan, further studies were made, and as a result, the present report was finalized. I hope that this report will contribute to the promotion of the project and to the enhancement of the friendly relationship between our two countries. I wish to express my sincere appreciation to the concerned officials of the Government of the Republic of Guinea for their close cooperation extended to the teams. August, 2003 Takao Kawakami President Japan International Cooperation Agency August, 2003 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Mr. Takao Kawakami President Japan International Cooperation Agency Dear Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • SCS Guinea: Citizens' Involvement in Health Governance
    SCS Guinea: Citizens’ Involvement in Health Governance Period of Performance: July 28, 2017 – October 26, 2020 Funding provided by: United States Agency for International Development Cooperative Agreement No. AID-675-LA-17-00001 Final Performance Report Submitted: January 25, 2021 Submitted to: Mark Koenig, Agreement Officer’s Representative (AOR), [email protected] Souro Kamano, Alternate AOR, [email protected] Albert P. Asante, Agreement Officer, [email protected] Bernadette Daluz, Senior Acquisitions and Assistance Specialist, [email protected] This report was prepared with funds provided by the U.S. Agency for International Development under Cooperative Agreement AID-675-LA-17-00001. The opinions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Agency for International Development. TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. i Acronym List .................................................................................................................................. ii Executive Sumary ........................................................................................................................... 1 Project Overview ............................................................................................................................ 4 Technical Approach .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Program Evaluation for Usaid / Guinea Basic Education Program Portfolio
    PROGRAM EVALUATION FOR USAID / GUINEA BASIC EDUCATION PROGRAM PORTFOLIO MAY 2006 Prepared by Michael Midling, Ph.D., Education Policy Specialist and Team Leader, USA Louise Filion, M. Ed., Senior Teacher Training Specialist and Co-Team Leader, Canada Emmanuel M. David-Gnahoui, Ph.D., Teacher Training and Decentralization Specialist, Benin Mbarou Gassama-Mbaye, Ph.D., Community Participation in Education Specialist, Senegal Amadou Tidjane Diallo, Ph.D., Education Specialist, Guinea Abdoul Karim Diallo, Ph.D., Education Specialist, Guinea For DevTech Systems, Inc. 1700 N. Moore St., Suite 1720 Arlington, VA 22209 USA Tel: 703/312-6038 Fax: 703/312-6039 http://www.devtechsys.com [email protected] Contract No. EDH-I-00-03-00002-00 Cognizant Technical Officer: Marisol Pérez AProgram Evaluation forStrategic USAID / ObjectiveGuinea No. 675-003: Basic EducationAppendix Basic Education Program Portfolio This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by DevTech Systems, Inc. DevTech Systems, Inc. PROGRAM EVALUATION FOR USAID / GUINEA BASIC EDUCATION PROGRAM PORTFOLIO Final Report under Contract No. EDH-I-00-03-00002-00 Submitted to: USAID/Guinea Conakry, Guinea CTO: Marisol Pérez Submitted by: DevTech Systems, Inc. 1700 N. Moore St., Suite 1720 Arlington, VA 22209 USA Contact: Isabel Dillener Email: [email protected] Phone: 703-778-2641 Fax: 703-351-8184 Evaluation Team Michael Midling, Ph.D., Team Leader Louise Filion, M. Ed., Co-Team Leader Emmanuel M. David-Gnahoui, Ph.D. Mbarou Gassama-Mbaye, Ph.D. Amadou Tidjane Diallo, Ph.D. Abdoul Karim Diallo, Ph.D. May 2006 DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government.
    [Show full text]
  • GUINEA NATURAL RESOURCES Mant-,AGEMENT ASSESSMENT
    GUINEA NATURAL RESOURCES MANt-,AGEMENT ASSESSMENT Martha Gaudreau, Team Leader, DAI Peter Gilruth, University of Arizona G. Edward Karch, E/DI Karen LeAnn McKay, DAI Barton Sensenig, E/DI March 5, 1990 Natural Resources Management Support Project (AID Project No. 698-0467) Contract No. AFR-0467-C-00-8054-00 C"4 NRMS GUINEA NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT Martha Gaudreau, Team Leader, DAI Peter Gilruth, University of Arizona G. Edward Karch, E/DI Karen LeAnn McKay, DAI Barton Sensenig, E/DI March 5, 1990 Natural Resources Management Support Project (AID Project No. 698-0467) Contract No. AFR-0467-C-00-8054-00 Prime Contractor: Principal Subcontractor: E/DI Development Alternatives, Inc. 1400 I Street, N.W. 624 Ninth Street, N.W. Suite 700 Sixth Floor Washington, D.C. 20005 Washington, D.C. 20001 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS GLOSSARY 1. INTRODUCTION TO THIS REPORT ........................... 1 2. INTRODUCTION TO GUINEA AND THE FOUTA DJALLON HIG HLANDS ............................................. 3 2.1. Natural Regions of Guinea ................................ 3 2.2 History of the Fouta Djallon .............................. 4 2.3 Land use in the Fouta Djallon .............................. 5 3. CURRENT SITUATION IN THE FOUTA DJALLON ............... 7 3.1. D em ographics .......................................... 7 3.2 Environm ental trends .................................... 8 4. PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES IN THE FOUTA DJALLON REGION ... 9 5. PROMISING AREAS OF INTERVENTION ...................... 11 5.1. Tapades .............................................. 11 5.1.1 Soil fetility and mulching .......................... 12 5.1.2 Compost ........................................ 13 5.1.3 Alley cropping .................................... 14 5.1.4 Crop varieties .................................... 14 5.1.5 Fertilizers ..................... ................ 15 5.2. Bottomlands ........................ ................. 15 5.2.1 Soil m anagem ent .................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Health Care Faranah, National Health Programme
    Guinea: 1.) Rural Health Care Faranah 2.) National Health Programme Ex-post evaluation OECD sector Basic health infrastructure – 1223012230/ Infrastruk- tur im Bereich Basisgesundheit BMZ project number 1.) 1993 65 776 (investment ) 2.) 1994 65 279 (investment ) 1995 144 (training – T) Project executing agency Ministry of Health Ministère de Santé Publique Consultant CES, Consulting Engineers, Salzgitter EPOS Health Consultants, Bad Homburg Year of evaluation 2002 Jahr der Schlussprüfung 2002 Project appraisal Ex-post evaluation (planned) (actual) Start of implementation 1.) 2nd quarter 1994 4th quarter 1995 2.) 2nd quarter 1994 4th quarter 1995 T) 7/1996 7/1996 Implementation period 1.) 24 months 45 months 2.) 24 months 44 months T) 36 months 54 months Investment costs 1.) 3.14 million EUR 3.55 million EUR 2.) 4.04 million EUR 3.63 million EUR T ) 0.92 million EUR 0.92 million EUR Counterpart contribution 1.) - 0.45 million EUR 2.) 0.41 million EUR - T) - - Finance from FC funds 1.) 3.14 million EUR 3.10 million EUR 2.) 3.63 million EUR 3.63 million EUR T) 0.92 million EUR 0.92 million EUR Other institutions/donors involved 1.) GTZ GTZ 2.) UNICEF GTZ, DED, Médecins sans Frontiè- res (Luxembourg) Performance rating 1.) Rural Halth Care Faranah: 3 2.) National Health Programme: 4 • Significance/Relevance 1.) 3 2.) 3 • Effectiveness 1.) 3 2.) 4 • Efficiency 1.) 3 2.) 4 Brief description, overall objective and project purposes with indicators The overall objective of both projects is to contribute to reducing mortality, particularly in chil- dren and mothers, in the programme regions, the prefecture of Faranah and five prefectures in Central and Upper Guinea.
    [Show full text]
  • Annexes – Chapter 5
    CBG Mine Expansion Project ESIA: Annexes – Chapter 5 6 ANNEXES - CHAPTER 5 Annexe 5-2 Volume II (Annexes 16 and 17) ANNEXES ANNEXE 16: HISTORY OF VILLAGES, LAND TENURE AND POWER ....................... 1 ANNEXE 17: CULTURAL HERITAGE SITES ...................................................... 72 1 ANNEXE 16: HISTORY OF VILLAGES, LAND TENURE AND POWER 1 DARAMAGNAKI COMMUNE 1.1 VILLAGE OF DIANDIAN Meaning: Dian means “happiness.” 1.1.1 HISTORY The village of Diandian was founded by Mamadou Safahirou Bah (aka Thierno Dian), who came from Hafia (Télimélé), which was founded by his father, Saliou Sadjo Bah, who came from Timbi Touni (Pita). After more than 25 years in Hafia, Mamadou Safahirou Bah decided to leave the village because of the evil genies occupying the area and to found his own village, the current Diandian. That was long before the colonial era. When he arrived, the area was unoccupied and he did not need authorization to settle. He was accompanied by his father and his family. He was a farmer and a great marabout (Islamic religious teacher). Several years later, he was joined by several lineages, including Diaogbé, led by Mody Cellou Bah, who came from Bagnan (Labé), Mamadou Mika Bah, who came from Bourouwal Tapé (Pita), where he had formed a relationship with the founder’s father, and by Mamadou Mika Bah from Kébou (Guinea-Bissau), who was on the move fleeing the power of Alpha Yaya Diallo, king of Labé. Upon arriving at Diandian, he decided to live there permanently. The founder later hosted Mody Sory Pérédjo Sow, who came from Doubi (in Koin Tougué) by way of Belaly (Telemilé).
    [Show full text]