DOCSLIB.ORG

Wetland Conservation Strategy for the High Valleys of the Salmon River, Idaho

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wetland Conservation Strategy for the High Valleys of the Salmon River, Idaho WETLAND CONSERVATION STRATEGY FOR THE HIGH VALLEYS OF THE SALMON RIVER, IDAHO Prepared by Edward Bottum Idaho Conservation Data Center October 2004 Idaho Department of Fish and Game Natural Resource Policy Bureau 600 South Walnut, P.O. Box 25 Boise, ID 83707 Report prepared with funding from the United States Environmental Protection Agency through Section 104(b) (3) of the Clean Water Act Grant No. CD 980742-01-3 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY.....................................................................................................................................1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...............................................................................................................2 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................3 SURVEY AREA..............................................................................................................................4 METHODS ......................................................................................................................................5 FIELD METHODS....................................................................................................................5 Reference Areas and Sample Sites ......................................................................................5 Field Data Collection ...........................................................................................................5 OFFICE METHODS .................................................................................................................6 National Wetlands Inventory ...............................................................................................6 Wetland Plant Associations .................................................................................................7 Site and Community Databases ...........................................................................................7 Site Ranking.........................................................................................................................8 RESULTS ......................................................................................................................................10 WETLAND ACREAGE AND TYPES...................................................................................10 WETLAND OWNERSHIP AND PROTECTION STATUS..................................................11 WETLAND CONDITION.......................................................................................................11 Wetland Losses ..................................................................................................................15 Functional Shifts ................................................................................................................15 WETLAND DIVERSITY........................................................................................................17 Wetland Plant Associations ...............................................................................................17 RARE FLORA.........................................................................................................................21 RARE ANIMALS....................................................................................................................22 CONSERVATION PRIORITIES FOR WETLANDS ............................................................24 Class I Sites........................................................................................................................24 Class II Sites ......................................................................................................................28 Reference Sites...................................................................................................................29 Habitat Sites.......................................................................................................................30 Other Sites and Priorities for Conservation .......................................................................30 How This Information Can be Used ..................................................................................31 How To Request Additional Information ..........................................................................31 i LITERATURE CITED ..................................................................................................................32 APPENDIX A................................................................................................................................35 IDAHO CONSERVATION DATA CENTER SITE AND COMMUNITY REPORTING FORMS....................................................................................................................................35 APPENDIX B. ...............................................................................................................................42 GUIDELINES FOR ASSIGNING ELEMENT (SPECIES AND PLANT ASSOCIATION) RANKS....................................................................................................................................42 APPENDIX C ................................................................................................................................44 SITE SUMMARIES FOR WETLANDS IN THE HIGH VALLEYS OF THE SALMON RIVER......................................................................................................................................44 BANNER CREEK FEN ................................................................................................................45 BULL MOOSE FEN......................................................................................................................47 CHILCOOT PEAK........................................................................................................................49 DITCH CREEK MEADOWS........................................................................................................51 MAYS CREEK FEN .....................................................................................................................53 MUD LAKE, VALLEY COUNTY...............................................................................................55 POKER MEADOWS.....................................................................................................................56 TULE LAKE..................................................................................................................................60 WARDENHOFF MEADOWS ......................................................................................................61 WARM LAKE...............................................................................................................................63 AYERS MEADOW.......................................................................................................................65 BEAR VALLEY CREEK HEADWATERS .................................................................................68 BEAR VALLEY-ELK CREEK FLOODPLAIN...........................................................................71 BEAVER CREEK FEN.................................................................................................................76 BLIND SUMMIT FEN..................................................................................................................80 CACHE CREEK LAKES..............................................................................................................82 CORDUROY MEADOWS ...........................................................................................................84 CROOKED CREEK EASEMENT................................................................................................88 CUB CREEK PEATLAND ...........................................................................................................89 ELK MEADOW ............................................................................................................................92 GOAT CREEK ..............................................................................................................................97 HUCKLEBERRY CREEK FEN ...................................................................................................98 ii MYSTERY LAKE.......................................................................................................................100 POLE CREEK MEADOWS........................................................................................................101 REDFISH LAKE MORAINE .....................................................................................................106 SHELL ROCK - RAINBOW LAKES.........................................................................................108 SOLDIER LAKES.......................................................................................................................110 BRUCE MEADOWS...................................................................................................................112 CAPE HORN MEADOWS-DRY CREEK .................................................................................115 TYNDALL MEADOWS.............................................................................................................117 APPENDIX D..............................................................................................................................122 ACRES OF WETLAND AND DEEPWATER
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Castilleja Publication of the Wyoming Native Plant Society December 2012, Volume 31(4) Posted at Castilleja Linariifolia
    Castilleja Publication of the Wyoming Native Plant Society December 2012, Volume 31(4) Posted at www.wynps.org Castilleja linariifolia In this issue: Desert Yellowhead . 1 Botanists Bookshelf - Intermountain Flora 2A . 3 Growing Native Plants – Short Shrubs . 4 Pocket Guide to Native Plants of Teton County . 6 GLORIA in Wyoming: Beartooth Mtns. and Yellowstone National Park. 6 Halfway Down, Halfway to Go . 8 Desert Yellowhead - One Decade Later By Bonnie Heidel Every plant has a story and some have tomes, if only we could read them start-to-finish! The Desert yellowhead (Yermo xanthocephalus) is the only federally listed plant that is endemic to Wyoming. It was discovered and described by Robert Dorn (Dorn 1991, 2006). Desert yellowhead was listed as Threatened ten years ago (Fish & Wildlife Above: Desert yellowhead (Yermo xanthocephalus) by Jane Service 2002) and critical habitat was designated Dorn. From Dorn (1991). Reprinted with permission from at the one known site not long afterward (Fish & Madroño (California Botanical Society). Wildlife Service 2004). More recently, mining developments in the vicinity have lead to a 20- completed it two years later (Fish & Wildlife year mineral withdrawal and road closures by Service 2010). Subsequently, the Service began the land-managing agency, Bureau of Land to compile information since the time of listing, Management (BLM 2008). called a 5-year review. It was completed and In 2004, a nine-year monitoring saga to posted this fall (Fish & Wildlife Service 2012). annually census the entire population of Desert These reviews revived questions about yellowhead was completed by Richard and species’ habitat requirements and survey Beverly Scott (2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogeny of Chinese Thuidiaceae with Emphasis on Thuidium and Pelekium
    Molecular Phylogeny of Chinese Thuidiaceae with emphasis on Thuidium and Pelekium QI-YING, CAI1, 2, BI-CAI, GUAN2, GANG, GE2, YAN-MING, FANG 1 1 College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China. 2 College of Life Science, Nanchang University, 330031 Nanchang, China. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We present molecular phylogenetic investigation of Thuidiaceae, especially on Thudium and Pelekium. Three chloroplast sequences (trnL-F, rps4, and atpB-rbcL) and one nuclear sequence (ITS) were analyzed. Data partitions were analyzed separately and in combination by employing MP (maximum parsimony) and Bayesian methods. The influence of data conflict in combined analyses was further explored by two methods: the incongruence length difference (ILD) test and the partition addition bootstrap alteration approach (PABA). Based on the results, ITS 1& 2 had crucial effect in phylogenetic reconstruction in this study, and more chloroplast sequences should be combinated into the analyses since their stability for reconstructing within genus of pleurocarpous mosses. We supported that Helodiaceae including Actinothuidium, Bryochenea, and Helodium still attributed to Thuidiaceae, and the monophyletic Thuidiaceae s. lat. should also include several genera (or species) from Leskeaceae such as Haplocladium and Leskea. In the Thuidiaceae, Thuidium and Pelekium were resolved as two monophyletic groups separately. The results from molecular phylogeny were supported by the crucial morphological characters in Thuidiaceae s. lat., Thuidium and Pelekium. Key words: Thuidiaceae, Thuidium, Pelekium, molecular phylogeny, cpDNA, ITS, PABA approach Introduction Pleurocarpous mosses consist of around 5000 species that are defined by the presence of lateral perichaetia along the gametophyte stems. Monophyletic pleurocarpous mosses were resolved as three orders: Ptychomniales, Hypnales, and Hookeriales (Shaw et al.
    [Show full text]
  • National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands
    ;>\ ....--'. PB89-169940 BIOLOGICAL REPORT 88(26.9) MAY 1988 NATIONAL LIST OF PLANT SPECIES THAT OCCUR IN WETLANDS: . NORTHWEST (REGION 9) " h d W"ldl"f S· In Cooperation with the National and FIS an I I e ervlce Regional Interagency Review Panels U.S. Department of the Interior REPR~EDBY u.s. DEPARTMENTOF COMMERCE NATIONAL TECHNICAL ItEORMATJON SERVICE SPRINGFIELD. VA 22161 S02n-'Ol RE?ORT DOCUMENTATION 11. REPORT NO. PAG, iBioloqical Report 88(26.9) 4. TItle arld SUbtitle National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetiands: Northwe~t (Region 9). 7. Autllor(s) Porter B. Reed, Jr. 9. Perfonnlnc O,..nl.etton H..... • nd _ .... National Ecology Research Center U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 11. <:omncttC) or Gr.ntCG) No. Creekside One Bldg., 2627 Redwing Rd. Fort Collins, CO 80526-2899 CGl 12. SIlO....,.;n. O,..nlUtlon H_ .rld Acid.... 13. TYIMI of Repott & Period e-Nd Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Research and Development 14. Washington, DC 20240 The National list of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands represents the combined efforts of many biologists over the last decade to define the wetland flora of the United States. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service initially developed the list in order to provide an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (FWS/OBS 79/31) to assist in the field identification of wetlands. Plant species that occur in wetlands, as used in the National List, are defined as species that have demonstrated an ability to achieve maturity and reproduce in an environment where all or portions of the soil within the root zone become, periodically or continuously, saturated or inundated during the growing season.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, Version 2018-07-24
    Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, version 2018-07-24 Kenai National Wildlife Refuge biology staff July 24, 2018 2 Cover image: map of 16,213 georeferenced occurrence records included in the checklist. Contents Contents 3 Introduction 5 Purpose............................................................ 5 About the list......................................................... 5 Acknowledgments....................................................... 5 Native species 7 Vertebrates .......................................................... 7 Invertebrates ......................................................... 55 Vascular Plants........................................................ 91 Bryophytes ..........................................................164 Other Plants .........................................................171 Chromista...........................................................171 Fungi .............................................................173 Protozoans ..........................................................186 Non-native species 187 Vertebrates ..........................................................187 Invertebrates .........................................................187 Vascular Plants........................................................190 Extirpated species 207 Vertebrates ..........................................................207 Vascular Plants........................................................207 Change log 211 References 213 Index 215 3 Introduction Purpose to avoid implying
    [Show full text]
  • An Empirical Assessment of a Single Family‐Wide Hybrid Capture Locus
    APPLICATION ARTICLE An empirical assessment of a single family-wide hybrid capture locus set at multiple evolutionary timescales in Asteraceae Katy E. Jones1,14 , Tomáš Fér2 , Roswitha E. Schmickl2,3 , Rebecca B. Dikow4 , Vicki A. Funk5 , Sonia Herrando-Moraira6 , Paul R. Johnston7,8,9, Norbert Kilian1 , Carolina M. Siniscalchi10,11 , Alfonso Susanna6 , Marek Slovák2,12 , Ramhari Thapa10,11, Linda E. Watson13 , and Jennifer R. Mandel10,11 Manuscript received 27 February 2019; revision accepted PREMISE: Hybrid capture with high-throughput sequencing (Hyb-Seq) is a powerful tool for 5 September 2019. evolutionary studies. The applicability of an Asteraceae family-specific Hyb-Seq probe set and 1 Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin, Freie the outcomes of different phylogenetic analyses are investigated here. Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Str. 6–8, 14195 Berlin, Germany 2 Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, METHODS: Hyb-Seq data from 112 Asteraceae samples were organized into groups at differ- Benátská 2, CZ 12800 Prague, Czech Republic ent taxonomic levels (tribe, genus, and species). For each group, data sets of non-paralogous 3 Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, CZ loci were built and proportions of parsimony informative characters estimated. The impacts 25243 Průhonice, Czech Republic of analyzing alternative data sets, removing long branches, and type of analysis on tree reso- 4 Data Science Lab, Office of the Chief Information lution and inferred topologies were investigated in tribe Cichorieae. Officer, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20013-7012, USA RESULTS: Alignments of the Asteraceae family-wide Hyb-Seq locus set were parsimony infor- 5 Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural mative at all taxonomic levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Subalpine Understory Vascular Plant Communities in the Face of Spruce Beetle Disturbance Julia Sobczak [email protected]
    University of Northern Colorado Scholarship & Creative Works @ Digital UNC Undergraduate Honors Theses Student Research 7-23-2019 Survey of Subalpine Understory Vascular Plant Communities in the face of Spruce Beetle Disturbance Julia Sobczak [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digscholarship.unco.edu/honors Recommended Citation Sobczak, Julia, "Survey of Subalpine Understory Vascular Plant Communities in the face of Spruce Beetle Disturbance" (2019). Undergraduate Honors Theses. 24. https://digscholarship.unco.edu/honors/24 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at Scholarship & Creative Works @ Digital UNC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarship & Creative Works @ Digital UNC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. University of Northern Colorado Greeley, Colorado SURVEY OF SUBALPINE UNDERSTORY VASCULAR PLANT COMMUNITIES IN THE FACE OF SPRUCE BEETLE DISTURBANCE A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment for Graduation with Honors Distinction and The Degree of Bachelor of Arts Julia Sobczak Advisor: Dr. Emily Holt School of Biological Sciences JULY 2019 SURVEY OF SUBALPINE UNDERSTORY VASCULAR PLANT COMMUNITIES IN THE FACE OF SPRUCE BEETLE DISTURBANCE PREPARED BY: ___________________________________________________________________ Julia Sobczak APPROVED BY THESIS ADVISOR: ___________________________________________________________________ Dr. Emily Holt HONORS DEPT LIAISON:
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide to the Moss Genera in New Jersey by Keith Bowman
    Field Guide to the Moss Genera in New Jersey With Coefficient of Conservation and Indicator Status Keith Bowman, PhD 10/20/2017 Acknowledgements There are many individuals that have been essential to this project. Dr. Eric Karlin compiled the initial annotated list of New Jersey moss taxa. Second, I would like to recognize the contributions of the many northeastern bryologists that aided in the development of the initial coefficient of conservation values included in this guide including Dr. Richard Andrus, Dr. Barbara Andreas, Dr. Terry O’Brien, Dr. Scott Schuette, and Dr. Sean Robinson. I would also like to acknowledge the valuable photographic contributions from Kathleen S. Walz, Dr. Robert Klips, and Dr. Michael Lüth. Funding for this project was provided by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2, State Wetlands Protection Development Grant, Section 104(B)(3); CFDA No. 66.461, CD97225809. Recommended Citation: Bowman, Keith. 2017. Field Guide to the Moss Genera in New Jersey With Coefficient of Conservation and Indicator Status. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, New Jersey Forest Service, Office of Natural Lands Management, Trenton, NJ, 08625. Submitted to United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2, State Wetlands Protection Development Grant, Section 104(B)(3); CFDA No. 66.461, CD97225809. i Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Descriptions
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Flora Checklist a Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Washington State Hosted by the University of Washington Herbarium
    Washington Flora Checklist A checklist of the Vascular Plants of Washington State Hosted by the University of Washington Herbarium The Washington Flora Checklist aims to be a complete list of the native and naturalized vascular plants of Washington State, with current classifications, nomenclature and synonymy. The checklist currently contains 3,929 terminal taxa (species, subspecies, and varieties). Taxa included in the checklist: * Native taxa whether extant, extirpated, or extinct. * Exotic taxa that are naturalized, escaped from cultivation, or persisting wild. * Waifs (e.g., ballast plants, escaped crop plants) and other scarcely collected exotics. * Interspecific hybrids that are frequent or self-maintaining. * Some unnamed taxa in the process of being described. Family classifications follow APG IV for angiosperms, PPG I (J. Syst. Evol. 54:563?603. 2016.) for pteridophytes, and Christenhusz et al. (Phytotaxa 19:55?70. 2011.) for gymnosperms, with a few exceptions. Nomenclature and synonymy at the rank of genus and below follows the 2nd Edition of the Flora of the Pacific Northwest except where superceded by new information. Accepted names are indicated with blue font; synonyms with black font. Native species and infraspecies are marked with boldface font. Please note: This is a working checklist, continuously updated. Use it at your discretion. Created from the Washington Flora Checklist Database on September 17th, 2018 at 9:47pm PST. Available online at http://biology.burke.washington.edu/waflora/checklist.php Comments and questions should be addressed to the checklist administrators: David Giblin ([email protected]) Peter Zika ([email protected]) Suggested citation: Weinmann, F., P.F. Zika, D.E. Giblin, B.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterton Lakes National Park • Common Name(Order Family Genus Species)
    Waterton Lakes National Park Flora • Common Name(Order Family Genus species) Monocotyledons • Arrow-grass, Marsh (Najadales Juncaginaceae Triglochin palustris) • Arrow-grass, Seaside (Najadales Juncaginaceae Triglochin maritima) • Arrowhead, Northern (Alismatales Alismataceae Sagittaria cuneata) • Asphodel, Sticky False (Liliales Liliaceae Triantha glutinosa) • Barley, Foxtail (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Hordeum jubatum) • Bear-grass (Liliales Liliaceae Xerophyllum tenax) • Bentgrass, Alpine (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Podagrostis humilis) • Bentgrass, Creeping (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Agrostis stolonifera) • Bentgrass, Green (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Calamagrostis stricta) • Bentgrass, Spike (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Agrostis exarata) • Bluegrass, Alpine (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa alpina) • Bluegrass, Annual (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa annua) • Bluegrass, Arctic (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa arctica) • Bluegrass, Plains (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa arida) • Bluegrass, Bulbous (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa bulbosa) • Bluegrass, Canada (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa compressa) • Bluegrass, Cusick's (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa cusickii) • Bluegrass, Fendler's (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa fendleriana) • Bluegrass, Glaucous (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa glauca) • Bluegrass, Inland (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa interior) • Bluegrass, Fowl (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa palustris) • Bluegrass, Patterson's (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa pattersonii) • Bluegrass, Kentucky (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa pratensis) • Bluegrass, Sandberg's (Poales
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 15-A
    Appendix 15-A Terrestrial Wildlife and Vegetation Baseline Report HARPER CREEK PROJECT Application for an Environmental Assessment Certificate / Environmental Impact Statement Harper Creek Mine Project Terrestrial Wildlife and Vegetation Baseline Report Prepared for Harper Creek Mining Corp. c/o Yellowhead Mining Inc. 730 – 800 West Pender Street Vancouver, BC V6C 2V6 Prepared by: This image cannot currently be displayed. Keystone Wildlife Research Ltd. 112-9547 152 Street Surrey, BC V3R 5Y5 August 2014 Harper Creek Mine Project Terrestrial Baseline Report DISCLAIMER This report was prepared exclusively for Harper Creek Mining Corporation (HCMC) by Keystone Wildlife Research Ltd. The quality of information, conclusions and estimates contained herein is consistent with the level of effort expended and is based on: i) information on the Project activities, facilities, and workforce available at the time of preparation; ii) data collected by Keystone Wildlife Research Ltd. and its subconsultants, and/or supplied by outside sources; and iii) the assumptions, conditions and qualifications set forth in this report. This report is intended for use by HCMC only, subject to the terms and conditions of its contract with Keystone Wildlife Research Ltd. Any other use or reliance on this report by any third party is at that party’s sole risk. This image cannot currently be displayed. Keystone Wildlife Research Ltd. Page ii Harper Creek Mine Project Terrestrial Baseline Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Harper Creek Project (the Project) is a proposed open pit copper mine located in south- central British Columbia (BC), approximately 150 km northeast by road from Kamloops. The Project has an estimated 28-year mine life based on a process plant throughput of 70,000 tonnes per day.
    [Show full text]
  • A Second Annotated Checklist of Vascular Plants in Wells Gray Provincial Park and Vicinity, British Columbia, Canada
    A second annotated checklist of vascular plants in Wells Gray Provincial Park and vicinity, British Columbia, Canada Version 1: April, 2011 Curtis R. Björk1 and Trevor Goward2 ENLICHENED CONSULTING LTD. Box 131, Clearwater, BC, V0E 1N0, Canada [email protected], [email protected] Vascular Plants in Wells Gray SUMMARY Wells Gray Provincial Park is a vast wilderness preserve situated in the mountains and highlands of south-central British Columbia. The first major floristic study of the vascular plants of Wells Gray and its vicinity was published in 1965 by Leena Hämet-Ahti, who documented 550 taxa, including a first Canadian record of Carex praeceptorium. The present study contributes nearly 500 additional taxa documented by us between 1976 and 2010 in connection with our personal explorations of the Clearwater Valley. The vascular flora of Wells Gray Park and vicinity now stands at 1046 taxa, including 881 native species and 165 species introduced from Eurasia and other portions of British Columbia. Wells Gray Park is notable both for the presence of numerous taxa (45) at or near the northern limits of their range, as well as for an unexpectedly high number of taxa (43) accorded conservation status by the British Columbia Conservation Data Centre. Antennaria corymbosa has its only known Canadian locality within Wells Gray, while five additional species reported here are known in Canada from fewer than six localities. About a dozen unknown, possibly undescribed taxa have also been detected. Botanical inventory has thus far been confined to the southern portions of Wells Gray. Future studies in northern half of the park will certainly greatly increase our knowledge of the biological diversity safeguarded in this magnificent wilderness preserve.
    [Show full text]
  • A. Spotted Dog WMA 2014 Title Page.Pages
    MONTANA PLANT SPECIES OF CONCERN OBSERVED Background Table 59 lists those plant species observed in Spotted Dog WMA and identified as Montana Plant Species of Concern (Montana Natural Heritage Program 2015) during the conduct of this inventory and ecological health assessment. A total of eight Montana Species of Concern were recorded, covering approximately 24.97 acres of the WMA. Ranking category definitions are provided on the pages following the table. Table 59. Montana Plant Species of Concern recorded in Spotted Dog WMA ————————————————————————————————————————————— G S USDI FWS USDA USDI Plant Species of Concern Acres Rank1 Rank2 ESA3 FS4 BLM5 ————————————————————————————————————————————— Erigeron formosissimus (wild daisy) 16.62 G5 S1S3 — — — Castilleja exilis (annual paintbrush) 6.65 G5 S2 — — S Agoseris aurantiaca (orange agoseris) 1.03 G4 S3S4 — — — Centunculus minimus (chaffweed) 0.53 G5 S2 — — — Ranunculus orthorhynchus var. platyphyllus (straightbreak buttercup) 0.07 G5 S1S2 — — — Amerorchis rotundifolia (small round-leaved orchis) 0.05 G5 S3 — S — Juncus covillei (Coville’s rush) 0.02 G5 S2S3 — — — Gentianopsis macounii (Macoun’s fringed gentian) 0.00 G5 S2 — S — TOTAL 24.97 ————————————————————————————————————————————— 1G Rank = Global (range-wide) Ranking 2S Rank = State Status Ranking 3USDI FWS ESA = USDI Fish and Wildlife Service Endangered Species Act 4USDA FS = USDA Forest Service Sensitive Species (S = Sensitive; T = Threatened; E = Endangered) 5USDI BLM = USDI Bureau of Land Management Sensitive Species (S = Sensitive Species) Table 60 shows the crosswalk from those scientific names and common names used in this report with those used by the Montana Natural Heritage Program for their Montana Plant Species of Concern. Ecological Solutions Group, LLC !244 3/17/2015 Table 60.
    [Show full text]