DOCSLIB.ORG

Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine Breakthrough Infections: 2001–2016 Tolulope A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine Breakthrough Infections: 2001–2016 Tolulope A Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine Breakthrough Infections: 2001–2016 Tolulope A. Adebanjo, MD, MPH,a,b Tracy Pondo, MSPH,a David Yankey, PhD, MPH,b Holly A. Hill, MD, PhD,b Ryan Gierke, MPH,a Mirasol Apostol, MPH,c Meghan Barnes, MSPH,d Susan Petit, MPH,e Monica Farley, MD,f Lee H. Harrison, MD,g Corinne Holtzman, MPH,h Joan Baumbach, MD,i Nancy Bennett, MD, MS,j Suzanne McGuire, MPH,k Ann Thomas, MD, MPH,l William Schaffner, MD,m Bernard Beall, PhD,b Cynthia G. Whitney, MD, MPH,b Tamara Pilishvili, PhD, MPHb BACKGROUND: Most countries use 3-dose pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) schedules; abstract a4-dose(3primaryand1booster)scheduleislicensed for US infants. We evaluated the invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) breakthrough infection incidence in children receiving 2 vs 3 primary PCV doses with and without booster doses (2 1 1vs31 1; 2 1 0vs31 0). METHODS: We used 2001–2016 Active Bacterial Core surveillance data to identify breakthrough infections (vaccine-type IPD in children receiving $1 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine [PCV7] or 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine [PCV13] dose) among children aged ,5 years. We estimated schedule-specific IPD incidence rates (IRs) per 100 000 person- years and compared incidence by schedule (2 1 1vs31 1; 2 1 0vs31 0) using rate differences (RDs) and incidence rate ratios. RESULTS: We identified 71 PCV7 and 49 PCV13 breakthrough infections among children receiving a schedule of interest. PCV13 breakthrough infection rates were higher in children aged ,1 year receiving the 2 1 0 (IR: 7.8) vs 3 1 0 (IR: 0.6) schedule (incidence rate ratio: 12.9; 95% confidence interval: 4.1–40.4); PCV7 results were similar. Differences in PCV13 breakthrough infection rates by schedule in children aged ,1 year were larger in 2010–2011 (2 1 0 IR: 18.6; 3 1 0 IR: 1.4; RD: 16.6) vs 2012–2016 (2 1 0 IR: 3.6; 3 1 0 IR: 0.2; RD: 3.4). No differences between schedules were detected in children aged $1 year for PCV13 breakthrough infections. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer PCV breakthrough infections occurred in the first year of life with 3 primary doses. Differences in breakthrough infection rates by schedule decreased as vaccine serotypes decreased in circulation. ’ aEpidemic Intelligence Service and bNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for WHAT S KNOWN ON THIS SUBJECT: A 4-dose Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; cCalifornia Emerging Infections Program, Oakland, California; pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) schedule is used dColorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, Colorado; eConnecticut Department of Public in the United States; most other countries use 3-dose Health, Hartford, Connecticut; fSchool of Medicine, Emory University and Atlanta Department of Veterans Affairs schedules. These 3-dose schedules have effectively g Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia; Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, reduced invasive pneumococcal disease and colonization; Maryland; hMinnesota Department of Health, St Paul, Minnesota; iNew Mexico Department of Health, Santa Fe, whether a 4-dose schedule better controls disease is New Mexico; jSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York; kNew York State Department of Health, Albany, New York; lOregon Public Health Division, Portland, Oregon; and mVanderbilt unknown. University, Nashville, Tennessee WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: Incidence of invasive The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily pneumococcal disease breakthrough infections was lower represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. in the first year of life for children receiving 3 vs 2 Dr Adebanjo made a substantial contribution to the conception and design of the study and the primary PCV doses. Differences between schedules are analysis and interpretation of the data and drafted the manuscript; Ms Pondo and Dr Whitney made reduced as vaccine serotypes decrease in circulation. a substantial contribution to the analysis and interpretation of the data and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content; (Continued) To cite: Adebanjo TA, Pondo T, Yankey D, et al. Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine Breakthrough Infections: 2001–2016. Pediatrics. 2020;145(3):e20190836 Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on October 2, 2021 PEDIATRICS Volume 145, number 3, March 2020:e20190836 ARTICLE Seven-valent pneumococcal conjugate with increased infection risk before culture date. Breakthrough infections vaccine (PCV7) was introduced for US and after the booster dose, compared in children with mixed vaccine children in 2000 on a 4-dose with the US-recommended 4-dose formulations (PCV7 and PCV13) were schedule, with primary doses at 2, 4, schedule with 3 primary doses. categorized by the vaccine of which and 6 months and a booster at 12 to they received the most doses. A 15 months.1 In 2010, 13-valent vaccine dose was only considered pneumococcal conjugate vaccine METHODS valid if it was received $2 weeks (PCV13) replaced PCV7 on the same IPD Case Identification before the culture date. schedule.2 Introduction of fi We defined primary doses as PCV pneumococcal conjugate vaccines Cases were identi ed through routine doses received before 8 months of (PCVs) dramatically decreased Active Bacterial Core surveillance 16 age and booster doses as PCV doses invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) (ABCs), a laboratory- and received at 12 to 16 months of age. incidence in US children aged ,5 population-based surveillance system PCV7 and PCV13 breakthrough years.3,4 Despite high vaccination operating in 10 US sites with 33.8 infections were classified by PCV coverage, not all US children receive million people under pneumococcal 17 schedule received before the the full number of recommended surveillance in 2017. IPD cases fi fi breakthrough infection as follows: doses. In 2016, 81.8% of children 19 were de ned as identi cation of to 35 months of age received $4 PCV pneumococcus from a normally Disease after the primary series only: 5 sterile body site (eg, blood, doses. 1. 2 primary doses, no booster (2 cerebrospinal fluid, or pleural fluid). 1 0) In 2012, the World Health Medical charts were reviewed for Organization recommended PCV use demographic information, infection 2. 3 primary doses, no booster (3 1 on a 3-dose schedule, either 2 type, and medical history, including 0) primary doses with a booster or 3 chronic and immunocompromising Disease after the primary series and 6 primary doses without a booster, conditions. Pneumococcal isolates booster dose: after studies revealed the were sent to the Centers for Disease 3. 2 primary doses with booster (2 immunogenicity of 3-dose schedules Control and Prevention (CDC) or the 1 1) and their effectiveness in reducing Minnesota Public Health laboratory 7–9 4. 3 primary doses with booster (3 disease and colonization. AUS for serotype assignments. In 2015 1 1) postlicensure case-control study and 2016, serotyping was assigned revealed that PCV7 effectiveness through the CDC Streptococcus Children who received $1 PCV dose against IPD with 3-dose and 4-dose Laboratory genomic bioinformatics but did not fit into these 10 18 schedules was similar. Accordingly, pipeline. classifications because of dose timing many countries introduced PCVs on were grouped into an “other a 3-dose schedule or switched from PCV7 and PCV13 Breakthrough schedule” category and were only 11,12 4-dose to 3-dose schedules. As of Infections included in descriptive analysis. September 2018, 117 of 143 During 2001–2016, IPD surveillance countries using PCVs use a 3-dose among children 2 months to 5 years Statistical Analysis schedule, with most developed of age included complete We performed a descriptive analysis countries using a schedule with immunization histories, obtained by of breakthrough infections in children a booster dose.13 contacting health care providers and with a known vaccine history, which Although PCV is highly effective in reviewing state immunization included demographics, clinical preventing IPD,14 infection can occur registries. We defined PCV7 presentation, comorbid conditions, in children who are partially or fully breakthrough infection as IPD caused and infecting strain serotype. We vaccinated.15 Because not all US by a PCV7 serotype (4, 6B, 9V, 14, used Poisson regression to calculate children receive the recommended 4 18C, 19F, or 23F) in a child who vaccine schedule–specific incidence PCV doses, we were able to use received at least 1 dose of PCV7 rates (IRs), along with rate multisite, population-based $2 weeks before the date of the differences (RDs), incidence rate surveillance data to describe pneumococcal culture. PCV13 ratios (IRRs), and 95% confidence breakthrough infections among US breakthrough infection was defined intervals (CIs). For population children aged ,5 years receiving $1 as IPD caused by a PCV13 serotype denominators for breakthrough dose of PCV7 or PCV13 by schedule. (1, 3, 4, 5, 6A, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, 18C, infection rates, we used vaccination Our primary objective was to 19A, 19F, or 23F) in a child who coverage data from the National evaluate whether a 3-dose schedule received at least 1 dose of PCV13 Immunization Survey–Child19 to with 2 primary doses is associated $2 weeks before the pneumococcal estimate the number of children Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on October 2, 2021 2 ADEBANJO et al vaccinated on any given schedule by children receiving 2 1 0 and 3 1 Markov chain Monte Carlo age. We combined 2001–2016 survey 0 schedules, we evaluated methods.20,21 Predictors of data for states in the ABCs system by breakthrough infections until vaccination schedule included PCV7 vaccine type (PCV7 or PCV13), birth 35 months on the basis of available versus PCV13 breakthrough infection, cohort, and length of follow-up for National Immunization Survey–Child age at infection, birth year, case each schedule (Table 1).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Systematic Booster After Rabies Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis to Alleviate Rabies Antibody Monitoring in Individuals at Risk of Occupational Exposure
    Article Systematic Booster after Rabies Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis to Alleviate Rabies Antibody Monitoring in Individuals at Risk of Occupational Exposure Perrine Parize 1,*, Jérémie Sommé 2 , Laura Schaeffer 3, Florence Ribadeau-Dumas 1, Sheherazade Benabdelkader 1, Agnès Durand 4, Arnaud Tarantola 1, Johann Cailhol 5, Julia Goesch 5, Lauriane Kergoat 1 , Anne-Sophie Le Guern 6, Marie-Laurence Mousel 2, Laurent Dacheux 1 , Paul-Henri Consigny 5, Arnaud Fontanet 3,7, Beata Francuz 2 and Hervé Bourhy 1 1 Institut Pasteur, Unit Lyssavirus Epidemiology and Neuropathology, National Reference Center for Rabies and WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Rabies, 75015 Paris, France; fl[email protected] (F.R.-D.); [email protected] (S.B.); [email protected] (A.T.); [email protected] (L.K.); [email protected] (L.D.); [email protected] (H.B.) 2 Institut Pasteur, Occupational Health Department, 75015 Paris, France; [email protected] (J.S.); [email protected] (M.-L.M.); [email protected] (B.F.) 3 Institut Pasteur, Emerging Diseases Epidemiology Unit, Centre for Global Health Research and Education, 75015 Paris, France; [email protected] (L.S.); [email protected] (A.F.) 4 Laboratoire Cerballiance, 75017 Paris, France; [email protected] 5 Citation: Parize, P.; Sommé, J.; Institut Pasteur, Centre Médical, Centre d’Infectiologie Necker-Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France; Schaeffer, L.; Ribadeau-Dumas, F.; [email protected] (J.C.); [email protected] (J.G.); [email protected] (P.-H.C.) 6 Benabdelkader, S.; Durand, A.; Institut Pasteur, Laboratory of the Medical Center, 75015 Paris, France; [email protected] 7 Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, 75003 Paris, France Tarantola, A.; Cailhol, J.; Goesch, J.; * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +33-140-613-436 Kergoat, L.; et al.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Vaccination Programme: Information for Healthcare Practitioners
    COVID-19 vaccination programme Information for healthcare practitioners Republished 6 August 2021 Version 3.10 1 COVID-19 vaccination programme: Information for healthcare practitioners Document information This document was originally published provisionally, ahead of authorisation of any COVID-19 vaccine in the UK, to provide information to those involved in the COVID-19 national vaccination programme before it began in December 2020. Following authorisation for temporary supply by the UK Department of Health and Social Care and the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency being given to the COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer BioNTech on 2 December 2020, the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca on 30 December 2020 and the COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna on 8 January 2021, this document has been updated to provide specific information about the storage and preparation of these vaccines. Information about any other COVID-19 vaccines which are given regulatory approval will be added when this occurs. The information in this document was correct at time of publication. As COVID-19 is an evolving disease, much is still being learned about both the disease and the vaccines which have been developed to prevent it. For this reason, some information may change. Updates will be made to this document as new information becomes available. Please use the online version to ensure you are accessing the latest version. 2 COVID-19 vaccination programme: Information for healthcare practitioners Document revision information Version Details Date number 1.0 Document created 27 November 2020 2.0 Vaccine specific information about the COVID-19 mRNA 4 Vaccine BNT162b2 (Pfizer BioNTech) added December 2020 2.1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Statements Contained in This Release As the Result of New Information Or Future Events Or Developments
    Pfizer and BioNTech Provide Update on Booster Program in Light of the Delta-Variant NEW YORK and MAINZ, GERMANY, July 8, 2021 — As part of Pfizer’s and BioNTech’s continued efforts to stay ahead of the virus causing COVID-19 and circulating mutations, the companies are providing an update on their comprehensive booster strategy. Pfizer and BioNTech have seen encouraging data in the ongoing booster trial of a third dose of the current BNT162b2 vaccine. Initial data from the study demonstrate that a booster dose given 6 months after the second dose has a consistent tolerability profile while eliciting high neutralization titers against the wild type and the Beta variant, which are 5 to 10 times higher than after two primary doses. The companies expect to publish more definitive data soon as well as in a peer-reviewed journal and plan to submit the data to the FDA, EMA and other regulatory authorities in the coming weeks. In addition, data from a recent Nature paper demonstrate that immune sera obtained shortly after dose 2 of the primary two dose series of BNT162b2 have strong neutralization titers against the Delta variant (B.1.617.2 lineage) in laboratory tests. The companies anticipate that a third dose will boost those antibody titers even higher, similar to how the third dose performs for the Beta variant (B.1.351). Pfizer and BioNTech are conducting preclinical and clinical tests to confirm this hypothesis. While Pfizer and BioNTech believe a third dose of BNT162b2 has the potential to preserve the highest levels of protective efficacy against all currently known variants including Delta, the companies are remaining vigilant and are developing an updated version of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine that targets the full spike protein of the Delta variant.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Vaccines Frequently Asked Questions
    Page 1 of 12 COVID-19 Vaccines 2020a Frequently Asked Questions Michigan.gov/Coronavirus The information in this document will change frequently as we learn more about COVID-19 vaccines. There is a lot we are learning as the pandemic and COVID-19 vaccines evolve. The approach in Michigan will adapt as we learn more. September 29, 2021. Quick Links What’s new | Why COVID-19 vaccination is important | Booster and additional doses | What to expect when you get vaccinated | Safety of the vaccine | Vaccine distribution/prioritization | Additional vaccine information | Protecting your privacy | Where can I get more information? What’s new − Pfizer booster doses recommended for some people to boost waning immunity six months after completing the Pfizer vaccine. Why COVID-19 vaccination is important − If you are fully vaccinated, you don’t have to quarantine after being exposed to COVID-19, as long as you don’t have symptoms. This means missing less work, school, sports and other activities. − COVID-19 vaccination is the safest way to build protection. COVID-19 is still a threat, especially to people who are unvaccinated. Some people who get COVID-19 can become severely ill, which could result in hospitalization, and some people have ongoing health problems several weeks or even longer after getting infected. Even people who did not have symptoms when they were infected can have these ongoing health problems. − After you are fully vaccinated for COVID-19, you can resume many activities that you did before the pandemic. CDC recommends that fully vaccinated people wear a mask in public indoor settings if they are in an area of substantial or high transmission.
    [Show full text]
  • GRADE Table 4. Is There a Need for a Booster Dose Following Immunization Wi
    GRADE Table 4. Is there a need for a booster dose following immunization with the primary series of inactivated Vero cell-derived JE vaccine in individuals living in JE-endemic areas? Population : Immunocompetent individuals living in JE-endemic areas Intervention: Two doses (primary series) of inactivated Vero cell-derived vaccine administered ≥12 months previously Comparison: Placebo/no vaccination/other JE vaccine Outcome : JE disease (immunogenicity accepted) Is there need for a booster dose following immunization with the primary series of inactivated Vero cell-derived JE vaccine in individuals living in JE-endemic areas? Rating Adjustment to rating No. of studies/starting rating 4 RCTs1 4 Limitation in 2 Serious -1 study design Inconsistency None serious 0 Factors decreasing Indirectness Serious3,4 -1 confidence Imprecision None serious 0 Publication bias None serious 0 Large effect Not applicable5 0 Quality Assessment Quality Factors increasing Dose-response Not applicable 0 confidence Antagonistic bias Not applicable 0 and confounding Final numerical rating of quality of evidence 2 Evidence supports limited confidence in the estimate Statement on quality of evidence of the effect on the health outcome. A primary series of inactivated Vero cell- derived JE vaccines administered to children in endemic settings elicits seroprotective neutralizing Conclusion antibody titres for at least 3 years after the primary immunization. Summary of Findings of Summary Based on a review of data on IXIARO 1Five clinical studies following participants 12 months post-primary series, 2 years, or 3 years are available, limiting the full assessment of long-term protection. Data in adults from non-endemic settings suggest a decline in seroprotection rates and GMTs in the 24 months following primary immunization.
    [Show full text]
  • Hepatitis B and Healthcare Personnelq &A IAC Answers Frequently Asked Questions About How to Protect Healthcare Personnel
    Hepatitis B and Healthcare PersonnelQ &A IAC answers frequently asked questions about how to protect healthcare personnel Experts from the Immunization Action Engerix-B (GSK) or Recombivax HB (Merck) should be vaccinated against hepatitis B if Coalition (IAC) answer your questions may be completed with Heplisav-B. However, they haven’t been previously vaccinated. about hepatitis B (HepB) vaccine. You’ll data are limited on the safety and immunoge- Receipt of the vaccine is not a reason to dis- nicity effects when Heplisav-B is interchanged continue breast-feeding. find additional &Q As about hepatitis B with hepatitis B vaccines from other manufac- There are no clinical studies of Heplisav-B in vaccine on the “Ask the Experts” section turers. When feasible, the same manufactur- pregnant women. Available human data on of immunize.org at www.immunize.org/ er’s vaccines should be used to complete the Heplisav-B administered to pregnant women askexperts/experts_hepb.asp series. However, vaccination should not be are insufficient to assess vaccine-associated deferred when the manufacturer of the previ- risks in pregnancy. Until safety data are avail- ously administered vaccine is unknown or able for Heplisav-B, providers should con- Hepatitis B Vaccination when the vaccine from the same manufac- tinue to vaccinate pregnant women needing turer is unavailable. hepatitis B vaccination with a vaccine from Which people who work in healthcare settings The 2-dose hepatitis B vaccine series only a different manufacturer. need hepatitis B vaccine? applies when both doses in the series consist Is there a recommendation for routine booster The Occupational Safety and Health Adminis- of Heplisav-B.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Vaccine Against HIV Infection
    Developing a vaccine against HIV infection KEY POINTS Researchers have been working on an HIV vaccine since the 1980s, but progress towards an effective vaccine has been much slower than anticipated. Finding at least a partially effective vaccine remains of critical importance for the HIV response. The biggest reduction in new infections would be achieved by a combination of PrEP, universal antiretroviral treatment for people already living with HIV, and a vaccine.1 An HIV vaccine is a more realistic prospect today than a decade ago and an optimistic forecast of HIV vaccine availability is that one might be available by 2030. Explore this page to find out more about the need for a vaccine against HIV, challenges in vaccine development, progress in developing a vaccine and achieving an effective vaccine for HIV. What is an HIV vaccine? Today, an effective vaccine against HIV does not exist. A vaccine that can prevent infection would teach the immune system to respond to HIV by making antibodies that can bind to the virus and stop it from infecting cells, or by promoting other immune responses that kill the virus. No vaccine is 100% effective, and this is likely to be the same for HIV. Some people who receive a vaccine will not respond strongly enough to the vaccine and will not be protected, as in the case of the seasonal flu vaccine. But finding at least a partially effective vaccine remains of critical importance for the HIV response, as all successful disease elimination strategies have included a vaccine among their arsenal. The need for a vaccine against HIV UNAIDS estimates that 1.8 million people became infected with HIV in 2017, 36.9 million people were living with HIV and 21.7 million were receiving antiretroviral therapy.
    [Show full text]
  • Vaccinations for Pregnant Women the Table Below Shows Which Vaccinations You May Or May Not Need During Your Pregnancy
    Vaccinations for Pregnant Women The table below shows which vaccinations you may or may not need during your pregnancy. Vaccine Do you need it during your pregnancy? Influenza Yes! You need a flu shot every fall (or even as late as winter or spring) for your protection and for the protection of your baby and others around you. It’s safe to get the vaccine at any time during your pregnancy. Tetanus, diphtheria, Yes! Women who are pregnant need a dose of Tdap vaccine (the adult whooping cough vaccine) during each pregnancy, prefer- whooping cough ably in the early part of the third trimester. It’s safe to be given during pregnancy and will help protect your baby from whooping (pertussis) cough in the first few months after birth when he or she is most vulnerable. After Tdap, you need a Tdap or Td booster dose every Tdap, Td 10 years. Consult your healthcare provider if you haven’t had at least 3 tetanus- and diphtheria-toxoid containing shots some- time in your life or if you have a deep or dirty wound. Human No. This vaccine is not recommended to be given during pregnancy, but if you inadvertently receive it, this is not a cause for papillomavirus concern. HPV vaccine is recommended for all people age 26 or younger, so if you are in this age group, make sure you are HPV vaccinated before or after your pregnancy. People age 27 through 45 may also be vaccinated against HPV after discussion with their healthcare provider. The vaccine is given in 2 or 3 doses (depending on the age at which the first dose is given) over a 6-month period.
    [Show full text]
  • Vaccine Immunology Claire-Anne Siegrist
    2 Vaccine Immunology Claire-Anne Siegrist To generate vaccine-mediated protection is a complex chal- non–antigen-specifc responses possibly leading to allergy, lenge. Currently available vaccines have largely been devel- autoimmunity, or even premature death—are being raised. oped empirically, with little or no understanding of how they Certain “off-targets effects” of vaccines have also been recog- activate the immune system. Their early protective effcacy is nized and call for studies to quantify their impact and identify primarily conferred by the induction of antigen-specifc anti- the mechanisms at play. The objective of this chapter is to bodies (Box 2.1). However, there is more to antibody- extract from the complex and rapidly evolving feld of immu- mediated protection than the peak of vaccine-induced nology the main concepts that are useful to better address antibody titers. The quality of such antibodies (e.g., their these important questions. avidity, specifcity, or neutralizing capacity) has been identi- fed as a determining factor in effcacy. Long-term protection HOW DO VACCINES MEDIATE PROTECTION? requires the persistence of vaccine antibodies above protective thresholds and/or the maintenance of immune memory cells Vaccines protect by inducing effector mechanisms (cells or capable of rapid and effective reactivation with subsequent molecules) capable of rapidly controlling replicating patho- microbial exposure. The determinants of immune memory gens or inactivating their toxic components. Vaccine-induced induction, as well as the relative contribution of persisting immune effectors (Table 2.1) are essentially antibodies— antibodies and of immune memory to protection against spe- produced by B lymphocytes—capable of binding specifcally cifc diseases, are essential parameters of long-term vaccine to a toxin or a pathogen.2 Other potential effectors are cyto- effcacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Book Chapter Pneumococcal Disease
    Chapter 25: Pneumococcal January 2018 25 Pneumococcal Pneumococcal meningitis NOTIFIABLE Pneumococcal The disease Pneumococcal disease is the term used to describe infections caused by the bacterium Streptococcus pneumoniae (also called pneumococcus). S. pneumoniae is an encapsulated Gram-positive coccus. The capsule is the most important virulence factor of S. pneumoniae; pneumococci that lack the capsule are normally not virulent. Over 90 different capsular types have been characterised. Prior to the routine conjugate vaccination, around 69% of invasive pneumococcal infections were caused by the ten (14, 9V, 1, 8, 23F, 4, 3, 6B, 19F, 7F) most prevalent serotypes (Trotter et al., 2010). Some serotypes of the pneumococcus may be carried in the nasopharynx without symptoms, with disease occurring in a small proportion of infected individuals. Other serotypes are rarely identified in the nasopharynx but are associated with invasive disease. The incubation period for pneumococcal disease is not clearly defined but it may be as short as one to three days. The organism may spread locally into the sinuses or middle ear cavity, causing sinusitis or otitis media. It may also affect the lungs to cause pneumonia, or cause systemic (invasive) infections including bacteraemic pneumonia, bacteraemia and meningitis. Transmission is by aerosol, droplets or direct contact with respiratory secretions of someone carrying the organism. Transmission usually requires either frequent or prolonged close contact. There is a seasonal variation in pneumococcal disease, with peak levels in the winter months. Invasive pneumococcal disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. It particularly affects the very young, the elderly, those with an absent or non-functioning spleen and those with other causes of impaired immunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Differences in the Concentration of Anti-SARS-Cov-2 Igg Antibodies Post-COVID-19 Recovery Or Post-Vaccination
    cells Article Differences in the Concentration of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibodies Post-COVID-19 Recovery or Post-Vaccination Andrzej Tretyn 1,† , Joanna Szczepanek 2,*,† , Monika Skorupa 1,2 , Joanna Jarkiewicz-Tretyn 3, Dorota Sandomierz 3, Joanna Dejewska 1,3, Karolina Ciechanowska 3, Aleksander Jarkiewicz-Tretyn 3,4, Wojciech Koper 5 and Krzysztof Pałgan 6 1 Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Torun, Poland; [email protected] (A.T.); [email protected] (M.S.); [email protected] (J.D.) 2 Centre for Modern Interdisciplinary Technologies, Nicolaus Copernicus University, ul. Wilenska 4, 87-100 Torun, Poland 3 Non-Public Health Care Centre, Cancer Genetics Laboratory, 87-100 Torun, Poland; [email protected] (J.J.-T.); [email protected] (D.S.); [email protected] (K.C.); [email protected] (A.J.-T.) 4 Polish-Japanese Academy of Information Technology, 02-008 Warszawa, Poland 5 The Voivodeship Sanitary-Epidemiological Station in Bydgoszcz, 85-031 Bydgoszcz, Poland; [email protected] 6 Department of Allergology, Clinical Immunology and Internal Diseases, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 85-067 Bydgoszcz, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-056-665-6080 † These authors contributed equally to this work. Citation: Tretyn, A.; Szczepanek, J.; Skorupa, M.; Jarkiewicz-Tretyn, J.; Abstract: At the end of 2020, population-based vaccination programs with new generation mRNA- Sandomierz, D.; Dejewska, J.; based vaccines began almost all over the world. The aim of the study was to evaluate the titer of Ciechanowska, K.; Jarkiewicz-Tretyn, anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies against the S1 subunit of the virus’s spike protein as a marker of the A.; Koper, W.; Pałgan, K.
    [Show full text]
  • Standing Orders for Administering Td/Tdap Vaccine to Adults
    Standing orders for other vaccines are available at www.immunize.org/standing-orders. note: This standing orders template may be adapted per a practice’s discretion without obtaining permission from IAC. As a courtesy, please acknowledge IAC as its source. standing orders for Administering Td/Tdap Vaccine to Adults Purpose To reduce morbidity and mortality from tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis infection by vaccinating all adults who meet the criteria established by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Policy Where allowed by state law, standing orders enable eligible nurses and other healthcare professionals (e.g., pharma- cists) to assess the need for vaccination and to vaccinate adults who meet any of the criteria below. Procedure 1 Assess Adults for Need of Vaccination against tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis based on the following criteria: • Lack of documentation of ever receiving a dose of tetanus and diphtheria toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) as an adolescent or adult • Currently pregnant (preferably between 27 and 36 weeks gestation) and no documentation of Tdap given during current pregnancy • Lack of documentation of receiving at least 3 doses of tetanus- and diphtheria-containing toxoids • Completion of a 3-dose primary series of tetanus- and diphtheria-containing toxoids with no documentation of receiving a booster dose in the previous 10 years • Recent deep and dirty wound (e.g., contaminated with dirt, feces, saliva) and lack of evidence of having received tetanus toxoid-containing vaccine in the previous 5 years 2 Screen for Contraindications and Precautions Contraindications • Do not give Tdap or Td to a person who has experienced a serious systemic or anaphylactic reaction to a prior dose of either vaccine or to any of its components.
    [Show full text]